Immediate Postpartum HemorrhageTUBNCT02226731
Intrauterine Tamponade With a Belfort-Dildy Balloon in the Treatment of Immediate Postpartum Hemorrhage
A study testing Early Belfort-Dildy Balloon and Late Belfort-Dildy balloon in people with Immediate Postpartum Hemorrhage, run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris at 1 site in France.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of early intrauterine tamponade with a Belfort-Dildy balloon catheter in immediate postpartum hemorrhage(IPPH) after vaginal delivery and refractory to first-line uterotonic treatment, ie performed at the same time as second line uterotonic treatment, as compared… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Immediate Postpartum Hemorrhage
- What is being tested?
- Early Belfort-Dildy Balloon and Late Belfort-Dildy balloon
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 405 participants
- Where
- 1 siteFrance
- Study dates
- 8 Feb 2017to 18 Aug 2020
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- The trial will include women:
- aged 18 years or older,
- who have just had a vaginal delivery
- between 35 and 42 weeks of gestation
- with a PPH persisting 15 minutes after the injection of 5 UI or 10 IU of oxytocin by slow IV and uterine massage,
- and who provided informed written consent. If her condition does not allow her consent to be obtained immediately in ethically acceptable conditions, it may be obtained from her healthcare agent, or if there is none, from a family member, if present. In case where neither a healthcare agent nor a family member is present on the day of inclusion, the patient can nonetheless be included. She will be informed secondarily, and her consent will be requested for the potential continuation of the research and use of her data
- Patient beneficiary or affiliated to a health insurance
Who cannot join
- The trial will not include women:
- who have just had a cesarean delivery
- with a contraindication to Sulprostone
- with clinical chorioamnionitis or an in utero fetal death
- or a medically-indicated termination of pregnancy
- with PPH secondary to cervicovaginal lacerations without any uterine hemorrhage, uterine rupture, or placenta accreta
Show all 12Show fewer
- with arterial bleeding requiring embolization
- with a purulent infection of the cervix, vagina or uterus
- with symptoms indicating a hysterectomy
- with cervical cancer
- with a uterine malformation
- or who refuses to sign the informed consent.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Assessment of the Efficacy of Early Intrauterine Tamponade With a Belfort-Dildy Balloon Obstetric Tamponade System in the Treatment of Immediate Postpartum Hemorrhage
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of early intrauterine tamponade with a Belfort-Dildy balloon catheter in immediate postpartum hemorrhage(IPPH) after vaginal delivery and refractory to first-line uterotonic treatment, ie performed at the same time as second line uterotonic treatment, as compared tolate intrauterine tamponade performed in case of failure of second line uterotonic treatment, on the final severity of PPH. ).
Read the detailed description
Immediate postpartum hemorrhage (IPPH) is among the most frequent causes of pregnancy-related mortality in both the USA and in Europe. In France, IPPH remains the leading cause of maternal mortality, responsible for 18% of the maternal deaths and 90% of the deaths from IPPH are considered avoidable. The initial treatment of severe IPPH involves medical management, uterine massage, and uterotonic drugs such as oxytocin, ergometrine, and prostaglandins or their analogues; In France oxytocin is used as the first line uterotonic, and Sulprostone as the second line uterotonic. When these first-line medical treatments fail, invasive therapies, including uterine compression suture, pelvic vascular ligation, or arterial embolization can be used, individually or in combination. Hysterectomy is the ultimate measure to control a hemorrhage and save the mother's life. Nonetheless, the management of severe IPPH is less well standardized than its prevention, especially after the failure of uterotonic drugs, as demonstrated by the heterogeneity of practices between countries and even between hospitals in the same country. These invasive treatments require specific and expensive technical and human resources and have adverse effects. That is why, over the last years, intra-uterine tamponade with balloon has been increasingly used; indeed, it is a new minimally invasive method that can be used directly in the delivery room, at the initial stage of second-line treatments; it could accelerate the control of IPPH, limit recourse to these surgical or interventional radiology treatments, and reduce the quantity of blood products transfused. Intrauterine balloon tamponade thus appears to be a potentially additional effective strategy for obtaining hemostasis in the case of IPPH refractory to conventional uterotonic treatments. Despite the fact that the current literature assessing its efficacy is limited to case series and before-after observational studies, the available evidence suggests that it is associated with a drop in the need for invasive treatments. Based on this evidence, intra-uterine tamponade balloon has been included in guidelines for PPH treatment in many countries, including France, and it has widely spread in clinical practices. The clinical question that is now arising is its optimal timing in the management of PPH. It is currently classically performed after failure of second-line uterotonic treatment but it is possible that its earlier use, after failure of first-line uterotonic treatment, could further decrease the rate of severe PPH.
A randomized controlled trial is therefore necessary to determine the optimal timing of intrauterine balloon tamponade in the treatment of PPH. .
We propose a multicenter, randomized open treatment trial with two parallel arms. The trial will be conducted in 21 maternity units. Before inclusions begin, the medical staff will be trained in the use of the obstetric tamponade system to be used in the trial. For each woman with IPPH refractory to first line uterotonic, the eligibility criteria will be immediately verified, the woman informed and her written informed consent obtained if that is possible. If not, the woman can nonetheless be randomized and she will be secondarily informed and her consent requested. The randomization list will be centralized and generated by a computer program under the supervision of the Paris Centre Clinical Research Unit. Allocation to a study arm will be performed on a secure Internet platform (CleanWeb) always accessible (24/7) in each delivery room. The clinician including the patient will know her allocation immediately.
The management of randomized women will depend on the arm to which they are allocated:
- In the Experimental arm : the intravenous second line uterotonic Sulprostone infusion will be immediately combined with an intrauterine tamponade with the Belfort-Dildy balloon. Balloon insertion and inflation will follow a standardized protocol. Its intrauterine position will be verified by abdominal ultrasound. If the bleeding persists from the cervix or the balloon catheter drainage port 30 minutes after the beginning of the Sulprostone infusion, the tamponade will be considered a failure and an invasive emergency procedure by interventional radiology or surgery will be arranged and performed immediately after the removal of the balloon in the operating room.
- In the Control arm, women will only receive the Sulprostone infusion first. If bleeding persists 30 minutes after the beginning of this infusion, an intrauterine tamponade with the Belfort-Dildy balloon will be performed. Balloon insertion and inflation will be performed following the standardized protocol. If the bleeding persists from the cervix or the balloon catheter drainage port 15 to 30 minutes after the introduction of the balloon, the tamponade will be considered a failure and an invasive emergency procedure by interventional radiology or surgery will be arranged and performed immediately after the removal of the balloon in the operating room.
In both arms, all patients will have an indwelling urinary catheter and will receive antibiotic prophylaxis (amoxicillin-clavulanic acid and gentamicin) beginning with the Sulprostone infusion and continuing for 48 hours. The other components of IPPH management (fluid resuscitation, transfusion, resuscitation) will comply with national guidelines. If the bleeding stops, the patient will be transferred to a continuous care or post-interventional monitoring unit. Monitoring will be conducted by the investigator who included the patient. A venous blood sample will be collected on the 2nd day postpartum to measure hemoglobin and hematocrit values. The data will be entered as they are collected throughout the trial with Cleanweb software.
The duration of the participation of each patient included in the trial will be from inclusion through postpartum visit, or a maximum of approximately 8 weeks after the delivery. The maximum duration of study treatment will be 24 hours for each patient included in the protocol.
The total duration of the trial will be 36 months including 24 months of patient inclusion: the first 4 months, before the beginning of the inclusion period will be devoted to training staff in the use of the balloon tamponade system and in compliance with the trial protocol and the 8 months following the end of the inclusion period will be used to finalize the data collection, clean the database and analyze it.
- Conditions
- Immediate Postpartum Hemorrhage
- Being tested
- Early Belfort-Dildy Balloon, Late Belfort-Dildy balloon
- Keywords
- Immediate postpartum hemorrhage, Intrauterine balloon tamponade
- Medical subject headings
- Postpartum Hemorrhage
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Early Belfort-Dildy BalloonDevice
Intrauterine tamponade with the Belfort-Dildy balloon, performed in the 15 minutes after randomization at the same time as the second line uterotonic treatment.
Late Belfort-Dildy balloonDevice
Intrauterine tamponade with the Belfort-Dildy balloon, performed if failure of second line uterotonic treatment, ie persisting bleeding 30 minutes after the beginning of this infusion.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Early Belfort-Dildy balloon device | Experimental | Not described Receives: Device: Early Belfort-Dildy Balloon |
| Late Belfort-Dildy balloon device | Other | Not described Receives: Device: Late Belfort-Dildy balloon |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Proportion of women who received at least 3 RBC units for the treatment of PPH and /or who had a calculated peripartum blood loss > 1000 ml.
With Calculated peripartum blood loss= estimated blood volume × ((prepartum Ht - Day 2postpartum Ht)/prepartum Ht ) and Estimated blood volume (ml) = booking weight (kg) × 85)
Measured: 1 day
Secondary outcomes (17)
Other markers of severe hemorrhage
Incidence of each component of the primary outcome
Measured: 1 day
Other markers of severe hemorrhage
Proportion of women with a total blood loss in the first 24 hours postpartum ≥ 1500 mL (estimated or measured).
Measured: 24 hours
Other markers of severe hemorrhage
Proportion of women receiving a postpartum RBC transfusion
Measured: 8 days
Other markers of severe hemorrhage
Mean number of units of packed red blood cells transfused in postpartum
Measured: 8 days
Other markers of severe hemorrhage
Proportion of women receiving at least 4 units of packed red blood cells.
Measured: 8 days
Other markers of severe hemorrhage
Proportion of women with a difference ≥ 4 g/dL between the hemoglobin value before and on the 2nd day after delivery in the absence of a transfusion of packed red blood cells.
Measured: 2 days
Other markers of severe hemorrhage
Mean difference between the hemoglobin values before delivery and on the 2nd day postpartum in the absence of a transfusion of packed red blood cells.
Measured: 2 days
Other markers of severe hemorrhage
Mean difference between the hematocrit values before delivery and on the 2nd day postpartum in the absence of a transfusion of packed red blood cells
.
Measured: 2 days
Other markers of severe hemorrhage
Total calculated peripartum blood loss
.
Measured: 2 days
Other markers of severe hemorrhage
Proportion of women with a total calculated peripartum blood loss ≥ 1500 mL
.
Measured: 2 days
Other markers of severe hemorrhage
Proportion of women transferred to Intensive care unit
Measured: 2 days
Other markers of severe hemorrhage
Proportion of women who had invasive second line therapy, any of the following : arterial embolization, pelvic arterial ligation, uterine compression suture, hysterectomy
Measured: 1 day
other Genital tract infection
Assessed by :
- Proportion of women with a temperature >38°5C during postpartum hospitalization
Measured: 8 days
other Genital tract infection
Assessed by :
- Proportion of women with endometritis during postpartum hospitalization.
Measured: 8 days
other Genital tract infection
Assessed by :
- Proportion of women who had endometritis at the 6 weeks postpartum visit.
Measured: 6 weeks
Other markers of severe hemorrhage
Proportion of women with a total blood loss in the first 24 hours postpartum ≥ 2000 mL (estimated or measured)
Measured: 24 hours
Other markers of severe hemorrhage
Proportion of women with a total calculated peripartum blood loss ≥ 2000 mL
Measured: 2 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Aug 2014 (estimated)
- Study start8 Feb 2017
- Primary completion30 Jun 2020
- Study completion18 Aug 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (6)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Immediate Postpartum HemorrhageStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 405 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, France, URC-CIC Paris Descartes Necker Cochin
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Patrick ROZENBERG, MD, Principal investigator, Department of Obstetrics, Poissy-Saint Germain Hospital CenterCatherine DENEUX - THARAUX, MD, PhD, Study director, Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, France
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02226731
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- P130914
- Acronym
- TUB
- Status last verified
- Aug 2025
- First submitted
- 6 Aug 2014
- Last updated
- 5 Sep 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Laas E, Bui C, Popowski T, Mbaku OM, Rozenberg P. Trends in the rate of invasive procedures after the addition of the intrauterine tamponade test to a protocol for management of severe postpartum hemorrhage. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Oct;207(4):281.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.08.028. Epub 2012 Aug 17.
PubMed 23021688Georgiou C. Balloon tamponade in the management of postpartum haemorrhage: a review. BJOG. 2009 May;116(6):748-57. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02113.x.
PubMed 19432563Tindell K, Garfinkel R, Abu-Haydar E, Ahn R, Burke TF, Conn K, Eckardt M. Uterine balloon tamponade for the treatment of postpartum haemorrhage in resource-poor settings: a systematic review. BJOG. 2013 Jan;120(1):5-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2012.03454.x. Epub 2012 Aug 13.
PubMed 22882240Revert M, Cottenet J, Raynal P, Cibot E, Quantin C, Rozenberg P. Intrauterine balloon tamponade for management of severe postpartum haemorrhage in a perinatal network: a prospective cohort study. BJOG. 2017 Jul;124(8):1255-1262. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14382. Epub 2016 Oct 25.
PubMed 27781401Rozenberg P, Sentilhes L, Goffinet F, Vayssiere C, Senat MV, Haddad B, Morel O, Garabedian C, Vivanti A, Perrotin F, Kayem G, Azria E, Raynal P, Verspyck E, Sananes N, Gallot D, Bretelle F, Seco A, Winer N, Deneux-Tharaux C; Groupe de Recherche en Obstetrique et Gynecologie. Efficacy of early intrauterine balloon tamponade for immediate postpartum hemorrhage after vaginal delivery: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Nov;229(5):542.e1-542.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.05.014. Epub 2023 May 18.
PubMed 37209893Kellie FJ, Wandabwa JN, Mousa HA, Weeks AD. Mechanical and surgical interventions for treating primary postpartum haemorrhage. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jul 1;7(7):CD013663. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013663.
PubMed 32609374
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Sep 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Assessment of the Efficacy of Early Intrauterine Tamponade With a Belfort-Dildy Balloon Obstetric Tamponade System in the Treatment of Immediate Postpartum Hemorrhage
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02226731
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- TUB / P130914
- Conditions
- Immediate Postpartum Hemorrhage
- Keywords
- Immediate postpartum hemorrhage, Intrauterine balloon tamponade
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 405 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, France, URC-CIC Paris Descartes Necker Cochin
- Study start
- 8 Feb 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Jun 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 18 Aug 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 27 Aug 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of early intrauterine tamponade with a Belfort-Dildy balloon catheter in immediate postpartum hemorrhage(IPPH) after vaginal delivery and refractory to first-line uterotonic treatment, ie performed at the same time as second line uterotonic treatment, as compared tolate intrauterine tamponade performed in case of failure of second line uterotonic treatment, on the final severity of PPH. ).
Detailed description
Immediate postpartum hemorrhage (IPPH) is among the most frequent causes of pregnancy-related mortality in both the USA and in Europe. In France, IPPH remains the leading cause of maternal mortality, responsible for 18% of the maternal deaths and 90% of the deaths from IPPH are considered avoidable. The initial treatment of severe IPPH involves medical management, uterine massage, and uterotonic drugs such as oxytocin, ergometrine, and prostaglandins or their analogues; In France oxytocin is used as the first line uterotonic, and Sulprostone as the second line uterotonic. When these first-line medical treatments fail, invasive therapies, including uterine compression suture, pelvic vascular ligation, or arterial embolization can be used, individually or in combination. Hysterectomy is the ultimate measure to control a hemorrhage and save the mother's life. Nonetheless, the management of severe IPPH is less well standardized than its prevention, especially after the failure of uterotonic drugs, as demonstrated by the heterogeneity of practices between countries and even between hospitals in the same country. These invasive treatments require specific and expensive technical and human resources and have adverse effects. That is why, over the last years, intra-uterine tamponade with balloon has been increasingly used; indeed, it is a new minimally invasive method that can be used directly in the delivery room, at the initial stage of second-line treatments; it could accelerate the control of IPPH, limit recourse to these surgical or interventional radiology treatments, and reduce the quantity of blood products transfused. Intrauterine balloon tamponade thus appears to be a potentially additional effective strategy for obtaining hemostasis in the case of IPPH refractory to conventional uterotonic treatments. Despite the fact that the current literature assessing its efficacy is limited to case series and before-after observational studies, the available evidence suggests that it is associated with a drop in the need for invasive treatments. Based on this evidence, intra-uterine tamponade balloon has been included in guidelines for PPH treatment in many countries, including France, and it has widely spread in clinical practices. The clinical question that is now arising is its optimal timing in the management of PPH. It is currently classically performed after failure of second-line uterotonic treatment but it is possible that its earlier use, after failure of first-line uterotonic treatment, could further decrease the rate of severe PPH.
A randomized controlled trial is therefore necessary to determine the optimal timing of intrauterine balloon tamponade in the treatment of PPH. .
We propose a multicenter, randomized open treatment trial with two parallel arms. The trial will be conducted in 21 maternity units. Before inclusions begin, the medical staff will be trained in the use of the obstetric tamponade system to be used in the trial. For each woman with IPPH refractory to first line uterotonic, the eligibility criteria will be immediately verified, the woman informed and her written informed consent obtained if that is possible. If not, the woman can nonetheless be randomized and she will be secondarily informed and her consent requested. The randomization list will be centralized and generated by a computer program under the supervision of the Paris Centre Clinical Research Unit. Allocation to a study arm will be performed on a secure Internet platform (CleanWeb) always accessible (24/7) in each delivery room. The clinician including the patient will know her allocation immediately.
The management of randomized women will depend on the arm to which they are allocated:
- In the Experimental arm : the intravenous second line uterotonic Sulprostone infusion will be immediately combined with an intrauterine tamponade with the Belfort-Dildy balloon. Balloon insertion and inflation will follow a standardized protocol. Its intrauterine position will be verified by abdominal ultrasound. If the bleeding persists from the cervix or the balloon catheter drainage port 30 minutes after the beginning of the Sulprostone infusion, the tamponade will be considered a failure and an invasive emergency procedure by interventional radiology or surgery will be arranged and performed immediately after the removal of the balloon in the operating room.
- In the Control arm, women will only receive the Sulprostone infusion first. If bleeding persists 30 minutes after the beginning of this infusion, an intrauterine tamponade with the Belfort-Dildy balloon will be performed. Balloon insertion and inflation will be performed following the standardized protocol. If the bleeding persists from the cervix or the balloon catheter drainage port 15 to 30 minutes after the introduction of the balloon, the tamponade will be considered a failure and an invasive emergency procedure by interventional radiology or surgery will be arranged and performed immediately after the removal of the balloon in the operating room.
In both arms, all patients will have an indwelling urinary catheter and will receive antibiotic prophylaxis (amoxicillin-clavulanic acid and gentamicin) beginning with the Sulprostone infusion and continuing for 48 hours. The other components of IPPH management (fluid resuscitation, transfusion, resuscitation) will comply with national guidelines. If the bleeding stops, the patient will be transferred to a continuous care or post-interventional monitoring unit. Monitoring will be conducted by the investigator who included the patient. A venous blood sample will be collected on the 2nd day postpartum to measure hemoglobin and hematocrit values. The data will be entered as they are collected throughout the trial with Cleanweb software.
The duration of the participation of each patient included in the trial will be from inclusion through postpartum visit, or a maximum of approximately 8 weeks after the delivery. The maximum duration of study treatment will be 24 hours for each patient included in the protocol.
The total duration of the trial will be 36 months including 24 months of patient inclusion: the first 4 months, before the beginning of the inclusion period will be devoted to training staff in the use of the balloon tamponade system and in compliance with the trial protocol and the 8 months following the end of the inclusion period will be used to finalize the data collection, clean the database and analyze it.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Early Belfort-Dildy balloon device | Experimental | Device: Early Belfort-Dildy Balloon |
| Late Belfort-Dildy balloon device | Other | Device: Late Belfort-Dildy balloon |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- aged 18 years or older,
- who have just had a vaginal delivery
- between 35 and 42 weeks of gestation
- with a PPH persisting 15 minutes after the injection of 5 UI or 10 IU of oxytocin by slow IV and uterine massage,
- and who provided informed written consent. If her condition does not allow her consent to be obtained immediately in ethically acceptable conditions, it may be obtained from her healthcare agent, or if there is none, from a family member, if present. In case where neither a healthcare agent nor a family member is present on the day of inclusion, the patient can nonetheless be included. She will be informed secondarily, and her consent will be requested for the potential continuation of the research and use of her data
Key exclusion criteria (12 listed)
- who have just had a cesarean delivery
- with a contraindication to Sulprostone
- with clinical chorioamnionitis or an in utero fetal death
- or a medically-indicated termination of pregnancy
- with PPH secondary to cervicovaginal lacerations without any uterine hemorrhage, uterine rupture, or placenta accreta
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Early Belfort-Dildy BalloonIntrauterine tamponade with the Belfort-Dildy balloon, performed in the 15 minutes after randomization at the same time as the second line uterotonic treatment. | Device | Early Belfort-Dildy balloon device |
| Late Belfort-Dildy balloonIntrauterine tamponade with the Belfort-Dildy balloon, performed if failure of second line uterotonic treatment, ie persisting bleeding 30 minutes after the beginning of this infusion. | Device | Late Belfort-Dildy balloon device |
Primary outcome
Proportion of women who received at least 3 RBC units for the treatment of PPH and /or who had a calculated peripartum blood loss > 1000 ml.
Time frame: 1 day
With Calculated peripartum blood loss= estimated blood volume × ((prepartum Ht - Day 2postpartum Ht)/prepartum Ht ) and Estimated blood volume (ml) = booking weight (kg) × 85)
17 secondary outcomes
Other markers of severe hemorrhage
Time frame: 1 day
Other markers of severe hemorrhage
Time frame: 24 hours
Other markers of severe hemorrhage
Time frame: 8 days
Other markers of severe hemorrhage
Time frame: 8 days
Other markers of severe hemorrhage
Time frame: 8 days
Other markers of severe hemorrhage
Time frame: 2 days
Other markers of severe hemorrhage
Time frame: 2 days
Other markers of severe hemorrhage
Time frame: 2 days
Other markers of severe hemorrhage
Time frame: 2 days
Other markers of severe hemorrhage
Time frame: 2 days
Other markers of severe hemorrhage
Time frame: 2 days
Other markers of severe hemorrhage
Time frame: 1 day
other Genital tract infection
Time frame: 8 days
other Genital tract infection
Time frame: 8 days
other Genital tract infection
Time frame: 6 weeks
Other markers of severe hemorrhage
Time frame: 24 hours
Other markers of severe hemorrhage
Time frame: 2 days
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Sep 2025.
- Background: PubMed 23021688Laas E, Bui C, Popowski T, Mbaku OM, Rozenberg P. Trends in the rate of invasive procedures after the addition of the intrauterine tamponade test to a protocol for management of severe postpartum hemorrhage. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Oct;207(4):281.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.08.028. Epub 2012 Aug 17.
- Background: PubMed 19432563Georgiou C. Balloon tamponade in the management of postpartum haemorrhage: a review. BJOG. 2009 May;116(6):748-57. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02113.x.
- Background: PubMed 22882240Tindell K, Garfinkel R, Abu-Haydar E, Ahn R, Burke TF, Conn K, Eckardt M. Uterine balloon tamponade for the treatment of postpartum haemorrhage in resource-poor settings: a systematic review. BJOG. 2013 Jan;120(1):5-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2012.03454.x. Epub 2012 Aug 13.
- Background: PubMed 27781401Revert M, Cottenet J, Raynal P, Cibot E, Quantin C, Rozenberg P. Intrauterine balloon tamponade for management of severe postpartum haemorrhage in a perinatal network: a prospective cohort study. BJOG. 2017 Jul;124(8):1255-1262. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14382. Epub 2016 Oct 25.
- Results publication: PubMed 37209893Rozenberg P, Sentilhes L, Goffinet F, Vayssiere C, Senat MV, Haddad B, Morel O, Garabedian C, Vivanti A, Perrotin F, Kayem G, Azria E, Raynal P, Verspyck E, Sananes N, Gallot D, Bretelle F, Seco A, Winer N, Deneux-Tharaux C; Groupe de Recherche en Obstetrique et Gynecologie. Efficacy of early intrauterine balloon tamponade for immediate postpartum hemorrhage after vaginal delivery: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Nov;229(5):542.e1-542.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.05.014. Epub 2023 May 18.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32609374Kellie FJ, Wandabwa JN, Mousa HA, Weeks AD. Mechanical and surgical interventions for treating primary postpartum haemorrhage. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jul 1;7(7):CD013663. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013663.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Immediate Postpartum Hemorrhage
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Intact Cord Placental Delivery vs Delayed Cord Clamping
Intact Cord Placental Delivery, Delayed Cord Clamping
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Immediate vs Delayed Postpartum Implanon-NXT
Delayed and Secondary Postpartum Hemorrhage
Recruiting
Comparative Efficacy of Carbetocin and Oxytocin in Parturients at Risk of Atonic Postpartum Hemorrhage Undergoing Elective Cesarean Delivery
Post Partum Hemorrhage
Active, not recruiting
Minimum Effective Duration of Intrauterine Balloon Tamponade for the Management of Postpartum Hemorrhage
Postpartum Hemorrhage, Immediate
RecruitingPhase 3
Double Simultaneous Uterotonic Agents Versus Single Agent Regimen to Prevent Early Postpartum Hemorrhage
Postpartum Hemorrhage
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Patrick ROZENBERG, MD principal investigator
Department of Obstetrics, Poissy-Saint Germain Hospital Center
Catherine DENEUX - THARAUX, MD, PhD study director
Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, France
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Early Belfort-Dildy Balloon and Late Belfort-Dildy balloon in people with Immediate Postpartum Hemorrhage, run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris at 1 site in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Sep 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Proportion of women who received at least 3 RBC units for the treatment of PPH and /or who had a calculated peripartum blood loss > 1000 ml. (time frame: 1 day). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02226731, which also lists 6 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Sep 2025.