AzTrials
AzTrials

InflammationPhase 1NCT02229201

Comparison of Two Anaesthetics on Brain During Brain Tumour Surgery

A Phase 1 study testing Propofol and Sevoflurane in people with Inflammation, run by University Medical Centre Ljubljana at 1 site in Slovenia.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Anaesthesia and surgical stress during craniotomy can lead to brain damage and activation of inflammatory response. Consequently inflammatory cytokines (IL6, IL8, IL10) are released. Cell mediated immune balance can increase postoperative complications (infections, wound healing, multiple organ dysfunction). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 years
Conditions the study is for
Inflammation
What is being tested?
Propofol and Sevoflurane
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
40 participants
Where
1 siteSlovenia
Study dates
May 2010to Dec 2013
Phase
Phase 1
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • age 18-80 years
  • American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-III
  • Scheduled for brain tumour surgery
  • Glasgow Coma Score 15
  • Cooperative

Who cannot join

  • No written informed consent
  • Eendocrine systematic disease
  • Ddrugs that alter endocrine metabolism
  • History of drug hypersensitivity
  • Drug addiction
  • Perioperative blood derivatives.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Slovenia1 site
  • University Medical Centre Ljubljana

    Ljubljana, 1000

Other trials in Slovenia

About this study

Official title: Phase 1 Study of the Impact of Propofol vs. Sevoflurane on Brain Damage and Inflammatory Response During Brain Tumour Surgery

Anaesthesia and surgical stress during craniotomy can lead to brain damage and activation of inflammatory response. Consequently inflammatory cytokines (IL6, IL8, IL10) are released. Cell mediated immune balance can increase postoperative complications (infections, wound healing, multiple organ dysfunction). Many studies have shown that volatile anaesthetics reduce systemic and local inflammatory response during major surgery, but animal studies have shown that volatile anaesthetics can induce neuroinflammation (IL6, NF-κB) that leads to decline of cognitive function in rodent and possible human.

Our aim was to investigate how anaesthetic technique for craniotomy influences the release of inflammatory cytokines. Our hypothesis was that when optimal neuroprotective strategies are followed during surgery intravenous anaesthesia attenuates inflammatory response comparing to inhalational anaesthesia.

Read more

The investigators included 40 patients anaesthetised with remifentanil based anaesthesia with sevoflurane (S group) or propofol (P group).

Plasma levels of IL6, IL8, IL10 were measured during preoperative, perioperative and postoperative periods of both groups of patients. The investigators also noted emergence parameters, postoperative (pain, shivering, vomiting) and neurological complications after surgery.

Read the detailed description

Anaesthetic technique for craniotomy has to provide optimal cerebral perfusion, oxygenation and prevent brain oedema (1). It also has to lower the stress response on pain during intubation and surgical manipulation. Emergence from anaesthesia has to be rapid and smooth to permit early postoperative neurological evaluation. The most likely opioid in the last decade is short acting opioid remifentanil that can be easy titrated during the procedure and provides early recovery (2, 3, 4, 5). Currently the propofol-remifentanil and sevoflurane-remifentanil are the most frequently used combinations for craniotomy (6, 7). Recently a multicentre study was published that did not show differences in early recovery between three groups (propofol-remifentanil: TIVA, sevoflurane-remifentanil, sevoflurane-fentanyl). Either technique provided optimal surgical conditions. The group received TIVA had attenuated changes in stress biomarkers (cortizol in plasma and urine, cateholamines. (8).

Anaesthesia and surgical stress during craniotomy can lead to brain damage and activation of inflammatory response (9, 10). Consequently inflammatory cytokines (IL6, IL8, IL10) are released. Cell mediated immune balance can increase postoperative complications (infections, wound healing, multiple organ dysfunction). Many studies have shown that volatile anaesthetics reduce systemic and local inflammatory response during major surgery (11, 12, 13, 14), but animal studies have shown that volatile anaesthetics can induce neuroinflammation (IL6, NF-κB) that leads to decline of cognitive function in rodent and possible human (15,16).

Our aim was to investigate how anaesthetic technique for craniotomy influences the release of inflammatory cytokines. Our hypothesis was that when optimal neuroprotective strategies are followed during surgery intravenous anaesthesia attenuates inflammatory response comparing to inhalational anaesthesia.

Plasma levels of IL6, IL8, IL10 were measured during preoperative, perioperative and postoperative periods of both groups of patients. The investigators also noted emergence parameters, postoperative (pain, shivering, vomiting) and neurological complications after surgery.

Patients and methods

Anaesthesia regimen:

On arrival in the operating room, the patients were randomly assigned to either Group P or Group S. Randomisation was done according to computer-generated order.

All patients were on a regimen of dexamethasone 4x4mg/day with the first dose given at least one day before surgery.

After arriving to the operating room the standard monitoring was instituted. An arterial catheter was placed in the radial artery to continuously monitor blood pressure. For extended haemodynamic monitoring Vigileo system was used.

Patients were premedicated with midazolam (2-3 mg i.v.) and ondansetron (4-8 mg i.v.). Antibiotic prophylaxis with intravenous cefazolin 2g/100 ml 0.9% NaCl was invariably used in all patients.

Anaesthesia induction in Group P was performed with propofol (Propoven, Fresenius Kabi) and in Group S with sevoflurane (Sevorane, Abbott Laboratories). Before intubation all patients received remifentanil (Ultiva, GlaxoSmithKline) and rocuronium (Esmeron, MSD).

After intubation, patient's lungs were ventilated mechanically, with 1:2 oxygen-air mixtures in P and S group. Ventilation was adjusted to maintain normocapnia. Anaesthesia was maintained by continuous infusion of propofol 4-6 mg/kg/h in the P group and with sevoflurane 0,8-1 MAC in the S group. Remifentanil was adjusted regarding to anaesthesia response (0.1 - 2 μg/kg/min). The depth of anaesthesia was measured by a bispectral index (BIS) monitor; BIS values were maintained at 40-60.

For haemodynamic management the following algorithm was used: continuous infusion of 0.9% NaCl 6 mL kg-¹ for the first hour, followed by 2.5 ml kg-¹h-¹ . If CI < 2 L/min/m2and SVV > 10%, 6% hydroxyethyl starch (Voluven, Fresenius Kabi) until SVV-10% ; if there is no improvement after 250 ml 6% HES-a, ephedrine (0.5% Efedrin, UMC Ljubljana Pharmacy) 5-10 mg iv or fenilefrin 50-100 μg (0.01%, UMC Ljubljana Pharmacy). If CI < 2 L/min/m2, SVV < 10% and heart beat < 40/min, atropine 0,5 mg. If the mean arterial pressure increases by more than 30% and the heart rate by more than 30% from baseline, the infusion of remifentanil is increased. Any adverse hemodynamic events that did not respond to changes in anaesthetic regimen could be managed with urapidil or metoprolol, as appropriate. Hypotension following blood losses was maintained with colloids (6% HAES) and blood replacement. Hemodynamic parameters were monitored continuously at 5-min intervals from the beginning of induction until the patients were discharged from the PACU.

30 minutes before the end of the surgery (at the time of dura closer) piritramid 5-10 mg was administered. Continuous intravenous infusion of piritramid was started postoperatively as patient control analgesia (PCA). The time of the operation was determined as the time from pin head-holder placement to its removal. The time from the end of the operation to the tracheal extubation was also noted. All patients were extubated in the operating theatre and then transferred to the recovery room.

Postoperative management:

After surgery, the patients stayed in the recovery room for one hour and were then transferred to the intensive care unit of the Department of Neurosurgery.

Standard postoperative monitoring generally used in these procedures was implemented. Oxygen titrated to the lowest level needed to achieve the target arterial oxygen saturation of 96%, was administered via a Venturi mask. Post anaesthetic adverse events and medication in ICU were recorded for a period of 24 h after anaesthesia. Adverse events were defined as any unintended changes in body function or well being, such as hypertension, postoperative nausea and vomiting, pain, neurological complications, in particular if clinical intervention or drug therapy was required.

Hospital stay was also recorded.

Study design:

This prospective randomised single centre study was conducted at the Department of Anaesthesiology and Surgical Intensive Care and at the Department of Neurosurgery, in close cooperation with the Department of Clinical Chemistry and Biochemistry, University Medical Centre Ljubljana. The investigators included 40 patients anaesthetised with remifentanil based anaesthesia with sevoflurane (S group) or propofol (P group). The study was approved by the National Medical Ethics Committee of the Republic of Slovenia. All the procedures were performed in accordance with Helsinki declaration. The written informed concern was obtained from all included patients. The patients included in the study were given anaesthesia by the same anaesthesiologist.

The data recorded included demographic characteristics, time of surgery, time to extubation, hemodynamic parameters.

Arterial blood samples for the determinations of cytokines (IL 6, IL 8, IL 10) were drawn at the following time points: 1. before induction, 2. During tumor resection 3. at the end of the surgery, and 4. 24 hours after surgery 5. 48 hours after surgery.

For analyses of serum interleukin-6 (IL-6), interleukin-8 (IL-8) and interleukin-10 (IL-10), blood samples were collected in tubes without additive. After centrifugation serum samples were stored at -20 ºC until analysis. Analyses of samples were performed in one batch. Chemiluminescent immunometric assay (Immulite analyzer; Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany) was used to measure the concentrations of IL-6, IL-8, and IL-10.

Conditions
Inflammation
Being tested
Propofol, Sevoflurane
Keywords
propofol, sevoflurane, Interleukin 6, Interleukin 10
Medical subject headings
Inflammation

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • PropofolDrug

    Also called Propoven 1%

    4-6 mg/kg/h during anaesthesia

  • SevofluraneDrug

    Also called Sevorane

    0.8 MAC

Study groups in NCT02229201
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
PropofolExperimentalintravenous anaesthetic
Receives: Drug: Propofol
SevofluraneActive comparatorvolatile anaesthetic
Receives: Drug: Sevoflurane

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Interleukin 10 plasma concentrations

    The interleukin 10 plasma concentrations during craniotomy (preoperative, perioperative and postoperative periods)

    Measured: Within 48 hours (1. Before surgery and anaesthesia 2. During surgery, 3. At the end of surgery 4.First postoperative day 5.Second postoperative day)

Secondary outcomes (9)
  1. Hospital stay

    Measured: within the first 15 days after surgery

  2. Pulmonary complications

    Measured: within the first 15 days after surgery

  3. Cardiovascular complications

    Measured: within the first 15 days after surgery

  4. Neurological complications

    Measured: within the first 15 days after surgery

  5. Reoperation

    Measured: within the first 15 days after surgery

  6. Death

    Measured: within the first 15 days after surgery

  7. Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV)

    Post anaesthetic adverse events and medication in ICU were recorded for a period of 24 h after anaesthesia. Adverse events were defined as any unintended changes in body function or well being.

    Measured: within the first 24 hours after surgery

  8. Pain using VAS score

    Post anaesthetic adverse events and medication in ICU were recorded for a period of 24 h after anaesthesia. Adverse events were defined as any unintended changes in body function or well being, in particular if clinical intervention or drug therapy was required.

    Measured: within the first 24 hours after surgery

  9. Change of blood pressure from the baseline

    Post anaesthetic adverse events and medication in ICU were recorded for a period of 24 h after anaesthesia. Adverse events were defined as any unintended changes in body function or well being, in particular if clinical intervention or drug therapy was required.

    Measured: within the first 24 hours after surgery

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted1 Sep 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study startMay 2010
  3. Primary completionDec 2013
  4. Study completionDec 2013

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 1
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
40 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02229201
Sponsor's protocol ID
UMCL-NKG-01
Status last verified
Aug 2014
First submitted
11 Aug 2014
Last updated
1 Sep 2014
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Blum FE, Zuo Z. Volatile anesthetics-induced neuroinflammatory and anti-inflammatory responses. Med Gas Res. 2013 Aug 1;3(1):16. doi: 10.1186/2045-9912-3-16.

    PubMed 23915963
  • El Beheiry H. Protecting the brain during neurosurgical procedures: strategies that can work. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2012 Oct;25(5):548-55. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0b013e3283579622.

    PubMed 22895122
  • Markovic-Bozic J, Karpe B, Potocnik I, Jerin A, Vranic A, Novak-Jankovic V. Effect of propofol and sevoflurane on the inflammatory response of patients undergoing craniotomy. BMC Anesthesiol. 2016 Mar 22;16:18. doi: 10.1186/s12871-016-0182-5.

    PubMed 27001425

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 1 study testing Propofol and Sevoflurane in people with Inflammation, run by University Medical Centre Ljubljana at 1 site in Slovenia.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Sep 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Slovenia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Interleukin 10 plasma concentrations (time frame: Within 48 hours (1. Before surgery and anaesthesia 2. During surgery, 3. At the end of surgery 4.First postoperative day 5.Second postoperative day)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02229201, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Sep 2014.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in