AzTrials
AzTrials

Postoperative PainMIRPEX-3NCT02230865

Prediction of Acute Postoperative Pain and Analgesic Consumption

An observational study of Postoperative Pain, run by Kasper Grosen at 1 site in Denmark.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Pain is an expected part of surgical recovery but effective pain management remains challenging. The high variability in postoperative pain experience and analgesic treatment response between patients is part of the challenge. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 15 years and older, men only
Conditions the study is for
Postoperative Pain
How many people
40 participants
Where
1 siteDenmark
Study dates
Aug 2014to Jun 2015
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 15 years and older
  • Men only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients with funnel chest (pectus excavatum) undergoing corrective chest wall surgery at Aarhus University Hospital

Who may be able to join

  • Elective minimally invasive surgical correction of funnel chest (pectus excavatum
  • age ≥15 years.

Who cannot join

  • Previous thoracic surgical interventions
  • Presence of diseases affecting the central and/or peripheral nervous system
  • Presence of chronic pain conditions
  • Inability to speak and/or understand Danish
  • Inability to understand and participate in the experimental pain session
  • Presence of psychiatric disorders
Show all 16Show fewer
  • History of frostbite in the non-dominant upper limb
  • Presence of sores or cuts on non-dominant upper limb
  • Presence of cardiovascular disease
  • History of fainting and/or seizures
  • Presence of fractures of the non-dominant upper limb
  • Presence of Reynaud's phenomenon.
  • Secondary exclusions included:
  • Insensitivity to experimental cold pressor pain
  • Lack of epidural catheter placement
  • Re-operation

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Kasper Grosen, MHSc, PhD contact

78464224

kasper.grosen@rm.dk

Asbjørn M Drewes, MD, PhD, DMSci contact

97660000

amd@rn.dk

Denmark1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Deparment of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark

    Aarhus, 8200

    Recruiting

Other trials in Denmark

About this study

Official title: Prediction of Acute Postoperative Pain and Analgesic Consumption by Preoperative Responses to Experimental Pain in Patients Undergoing Chest Wall Surgery

Pain is an expected part of surgical recovery but effective pain management remains challenging. The high variability in postoperative pain experience and analgesic treatment response between patients is part of the challenge. Few studies have yet combined preoperative assessment of responses to experimental pain with measurements of cognitive and emotional processes in the prediction of postoperative pain.

We hypothesize, that preoperative evoked brain potentials (using standard electroencephalographic brain imaging), endogenous pain inhibition capacity (conditioned pain modulation), responses to pressure/thermal pain stimulation, and/or situational pain-related catastrophic thinking are useful clinical predictors of postoperative pain and analgesic consumption.

Read the detailed description

Preselected preoperative predictor variables/individual patient characteristics include the following:

  • Evoked brain potentials (using standard electroencephalographic brain imaging)
  • Capacity of descending pain inhibition induced by a cold pressor test (2C in 120 sec)
  • Pressure pain detection and tolerance thresholds in muscle (m.quadriceps)
  • Pressure pain tolerance thresholds in bone (sternum and tibia)
  • Heat pain tolerance threshold in skin (forearm)
  • Responses to the Situational and Dispositional Pain Catastrophizing Scale
  • Response to the State-Trait and Anxiety Inventory
  • Response to the Beck's Depression Inventory
Keywords
Funnel chest (Pectus excavatum)
Medical subject headings
Pain, Postoperative, Funnel Chest

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT02230865
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
SurgeryMinimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Postoperative pain intensity

    11-point (0-10) numerical rating scale of pain intensity

    Measured: Within the first 5 days after surgery

  2. Postoperative pain unpleasantness

    11-point (0-10) numerical rating scale of pain unpleasantness

    Measured: Within the first 5 days after surgery

  3. Postoperative consumption of analgesics

    The use of all pain-related treatments, including rescue analgesics and any other concomitant pain treatments.

    Measured: Within the first 5 days after surgery

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted3 Sep 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study startAug 2014
  3. Primary completionJun 2015 (estimated)
  4. Study completionJun 2015 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
40 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02230865
Sponsor's protocol ID
MIRPEX-3
Acronym
MIRPEX-3
Status last verified
May 2015
First submitted
29 Aug 2014
Last updated
1 Jun 2015
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Grosen K, Vase L, Pilegaard HK, Pfeiffer-Jensen M, Drewes AM. Conditioned pain modulation and situational pain catastrophizing as preoperative predictors of pain following chest wall surgery: a prospective observational cohort study. PLoS One. 2014 Feb 26;9(2):e90185. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090185. eCollection 2014.

    PubMed 24587268

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Postoperative Pain, run by Kasper Grosen at 1 site in Denmark.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 16 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Jun 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Kasper Grosen, MHSc, PhD (78464224, kasper.grosen@rm.dk), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Postoperative pain intensity (time frame: Within the first 5 days after surgery). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02230865, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Jun 2015.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in