SurgeryPhase 3VVC and GPSNCT02231528
Interest of Ultrasound Coupled to a Guidance System (GPS) for Central Venous Catheters (CVC) Insertion.
A Phase 3 study testing Use of ultrasound with active GPS and Use of ultrasound with inactive GPS in people with Surgery, run by University Hospital, Grenoble at 1 site in France.
Trial summary
The GPS system would simplify the technical implementation of central venous catheter under ultrasound guidance. We can assume that the introduction of deep venous pathways (as a reference, the internal jugular) will be faster, and this, whatever the level of expertise. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Surgery
- What is being tested?
- Use of ultrasound with active GPS and Use of ultrasound with inactive GPS
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 100 participants
- Where
- 1 siteFrance
- Study dates
- Oct 2013to Sep 2014
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Adults 2 sexes
- Age> 18years
- Indication for placing a central venous catheter in internal jugular
- Scheduled installation
Who cannot join
- Persons referred to in Articles L. 1121-5 to L. 1121-8 Code of Public Health,
- Lack of coverage by social security
- Refusal of patient consent
- Contraindication for placement of a central venous catheter in internal jugular
- Emergency
- Pregnancy
- Doppler data from the supra-aortic trunks if it exists (eg bilateral carotid stenosis)
- Pacemaker, defibrillator
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
The GPS system would simplify the technical implementation of central venous catheter under ultrasound guidance. We can assume that the introduction of deep venous pathways (as a reference, the internal jugular) will be faster, and this, whatever the level of expertise. By checking this hypothesis, this technique could be applied to much less frequent situations establishment of difficult central venous catheters (hemodynamic status precarious, hypovolemia, or cardiac arrest).
The main objective of this study is to evaluate the time savings provided by the ultrasound assisted GPS guidance for installing central venous catheters in the internal jugular. Central venous catheters are inserted in the operating room under conditions scheduled in advance that is to say outside emergency. The installation time for the central venous catheter is compared with that obtained by using the ultrasound machine without the GPS guide ("conventional" technique).
Read the detailed description
The techniques of reference for the central venous access (internal jugular, subclavian or femoral) are based on anatomical landmarks and the low probability of anatomical variations. With these techniques, the central venous puncture, with Seldinger method, is associated to complications both in adults and in children (pneumothorax, hemothorax, infection, thrombosis, arterial puncture, inappropriate location). The frequency of these adverse events is highly variable and ranges between 1 and 20% of central venous catheters in place. Ultrasound, visualizing anatomical structures before (echo tracking) or during (ultrasound guidance) the puncture, improves about 80% the success of the first puncture, and decreases by 50% the complications. The ultrasound guidance is better than echo tracking to reduce the time of implementation of the central venous catheter. However, this technique requires more practice. On the other hand, visualization of the needle path is not always easy especially for the subclavian access, because it requires a puncture in the ultrasound plane.
GPS system (Guidance Positioning System) is an original system of guidance. This is a simple navigation system for projecting the theoretical position of the puncture needle in the ultrasound plane. The guidance system consists of a receiver and two motion sensors. The receiver is connected to the system. A motion sensor is incorporated into the end of the needle. Another motion sensor is located within the ultrasound probe. The relative positions and the axes of the needle and the ultrasound probe are transmitted with coordinates in three dimensions.
The puncture can be carried out of the plane (ultrasound probe perpendicular to the axis puncture) and the direct visualization of the needle is not necessary. Before the puncture, the end of the needle is placed on the skin. The direction and the axis of the needle relative to the skin are adjusted, before the puncture, depending on the position of the target to be achieved, displayed by a mark on the screen. Throughout the puncture, a projected image of the needle is displayed on the screen.
- Conditions
- Surgery
- Being tested
- Use of ultrasound with active GPS, Use of ultrasound with inactive GPS
- Keywords
- anesthesia, central venous catheter, jugular vein, ultrasound guidance
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Use of ultrasound with active GPSDevice
CVC insertion with ultrasound with active GPS function and appropriate needles
Use of ultrasound with inactive GPSDevice
CVC insertion with ultrasound with inactive GPS function and conventional needles
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Use of ultrasound with active GPS | Experimental | Not described Receives: Device: Use of ultrasound with active GPS |
| Use of ultrasound with inactive GPS | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Device: Use of ultrasound with inactive GPS |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Time required for CVC insertion
Measured: at the end of the insertion of the guide wire, an average of one and a half minutes after the beginning of the procedure
Secondary outcomes (3)
Total number of puncture
Measured: at the end of the insertion of the guide wire, an average of one and a half minutes after the beginning of the procedure
Complication rate in the superior vena cava territory
Complication rate secondary to cannulation in the territory superior vena cava: arterial puncture, subcutaneous hematoma, pneumothorax, difficulty progression of the guide, aberrant pathway, transfixion of the vein
Measured: At 24 hours
Insertion failure rate
Failure is defined as the necessity to change anatomical site despite the visualization of the vein or stop using the GPS function
Measured: at the end of the insertion of the guide wire, an average of one and a half minutes after the beginning of the procedure
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 Sep 2014 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2013
- Primary completionSep 2014
- Study completionSep 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for SurgeryStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University Hospital, GrenobleThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, Grenoble
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Pierre ALBALADEJO, MD, Principal investigator, University Hospital, Grenoble
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02231528
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 1230
- Acronym
- VVC and GPS
- Status last verified
- Jun 2015
- First submitted
- 27 Aug 2014
- Last updated
- 2 Jun 2015
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Graham AS, Ozment C, Tegtmeyer K, Lai S, Braner DA. Videos in clinical medicine. Central venous catheterization. N Engl J Med. 2007 May 24;356(21):e21. doi: 10.1056/NEJMvcm055053. No abstract available.
PubMed 17522396Hind D, Calvert N, McWilliams R, Davidson A, Paisley S, Beverley C, Thomas S. Ultrasonic locating devices for central venous cannulation: meta-analysis. BMJ. 2003 Aug 16;327(7411):361. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7411.361.
PubMed 12919984Randolph AG, Cook DJ, Gonzales CA, Pribble CG. Ultrasound guidance for placement of central venous catheters: a meta-analysis of the literature. Crit Care Med. 1996 Dec;24(12):2053-8. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199612000-00020.
PubMed 8968276Hosokawa K, Shime N, Kato Y, Hashimoto S. A randomized trial of ultrasound image-based skin surface marking versus real-time ultrasound-guided internal jugular vein catheterization in infants. Anesthesiology. 2007 Nov;107(5):720-4. doi: 10.1097/01.anes.0000287024.19704.96.
PubMed 18073546American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Central Venous Access; Rupp SM, Apfelbaum JL, Blitt C, Caplan RA, Connis RT, Domino KB, Fleisher LA, Grant S, Mark JB, Morray JP, Nickinovich DG, Tung A. Practice guidelines for central venous access: a report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Central Venous Access. Anesthesiology. 2012 Mar;116(3):539-73. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31823c9569. No abstract available.
PubMed 22307320
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 2 Jun 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Interest of Ultrasound Coupled to a Guidance System (GPS) for Central Venous Catheters (CVC) Insertion.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02231528
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- VVC and GPS / 1230
- Conditions
- Surgery
- Keywords
- anesthesia, central venous catheter, jugular vein, ultrasound guidance
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, GrenobleUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Oct 2013
- Primary completion
- Sep 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- Sep 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 4 Sep 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The GPS system would simplify the technical implementation of central venous catheter under ultrasound guidance. We can assume that the introduction of deep venous pathways (as a reference, the internal jugular) will be faster, and this, whatever the level of expertise. By checking this hypothesis, this technique could be applied to much less frequent situations establishment of difficult central venous catheters (hemodynamic status precarious, hypovolemia, or cardiac arrest).
The main objective of this study is to evaluate the time savings provided by the ultrasound assisted GPS guidance for installing central venous catheters in the internal jugular. Central venous catheters are inserted in the operating room under conditions scheduled in advance that is to say outside emergency. The installation time for the central venous catheter is compared with that obtained by using the ultrasound machine without the GPS guide ("conventional" technique).
Detailed description
The techniques of reference for the central venous access (internal jugular, subclavian or femoral) are based on anatomical landmarks and the low probability of anatomical variations. With these techniques, the central venous puncture, with Seldinger method, is associated to complications both in adults and in children (pneumothorax, hemothorax, infection, thrombosis, arterial puncture, inappropriate location). The frequency of these adverse events is highly variable and ranges between 1 and 20% of central venous catheters in place. Ultrasound, visualizing anatomical structures before (echo tracking) or during (ultrasound guidance) the puncture, improves about 80% the success of the first puncture, and decreases by 50% the complications. The ultrasound guidance is better than echo tracking to reduce the time of implementation of the central venous catheter. However, this technique requires more practice. On the other hand, visualization of the needle path is not always easy especially for the subclavian access, because it requires a puncture in the ultrasound plane.
GPS system (Guidance Positioning System) is an original system of guidance. This is a simple navigation system for projecting the theoretical position of the puncture needle in the ultrasound plane. The guidance system consists of a receiver and two motion sensors. The receiver is connected to the system. A motion sensor is incorporated into the end of the needle. Another motion sensor is located within the ultrasound probe. The relative positions and the axes of the needle and the ultrasound probe are transmitted with coordinates in three dimensions.
The puncture can be carried out of the plane (ultrasound probe perpendicular to the axis puncture) and the direct visualization of the needle is not necessary. Before the puncture, the end of the needle is placed on the skin. The direction and the axis of the needle relative to the skin are adjusted, before the puncture, depending on the position of the target to be achieved, displayed by a mark on the screen. Throughout the puncture, a projected image of the needle is displayed on the screen.
Study design
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Use of ultrasound with active GPS | Experimental | Device: Use of ultrasound with active GPS |
| Use of ultrasound with inactive GPS | Active comparator | Device: Use of ultrasound with inactive GPS |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Adults 2 sexes
- Age> 18years
- Indication for placing a central venous catheter in internal jugular
- Scheduled installation
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Persons referred to in Articles L. 1121-5 to L. 1121-8 Code of Public Health,
- Lack of coverage by social security
- Refusal of patient consent
- Contraindication for placement of a central venous catheter in internal jugular
- Emergency
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Use of ultrasound with active GPSCVC insertion with ultrasound with active GPS function and appropriate needles | Device | Use of ultrasound with active GPS |
| Use of ultrasound with inactive GPSCVC insertion with ultrasound with inactive GPS function and conventional needles | Device | Use of ultrasound with inactive GPS |
Primary outcome
Time required for CVC insertion
Time frame: at the end of the insertion of the guide wire, an average of one and a half minutes after the beginning of the procedure
3 secondary outcomes
Total number of puncture
Time frame: at the end of the insertion of the guide wire, an average of one and a half minutes after the beginning of the procedure
Complication rate in the superior vena cava territory
Time frame: At 24 hours
Insertion failure rate
Time frame: at the end of the insertion of the guide wire, an average of one and a half minutes after the beginning of the procedure
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 2 Jun 2015.
- Background: PubMed 17522396Graham AS, Ozment C, Tegtmeyer K, Lai S, Braner DA. Videos in clinical medicine. Central venous catheterization. N Engl J Med. 2007 May 24;356(21):e21. doi: 10.1056/NEJMvcm055053. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 12919984Hind D, Calvert N, McWilliams R, Davidson A, Paisley S, Beverley C, Thomas S. Ultrasonic locating devices for central venous cannulation: meta-analysis. BMJ. 2003 Aug 16;327(7411):361. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7411.361.
- Background: PubMed 8968276Randolph AG, Cook DJ, Gonzales CA, Pribble CG. Ultrasound guidance for placement of central venous catheters: a meta-analysis of the literature. Crit Care Med. 1996 Dec;24(12):2053-8. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199612000-00020.
- Background: PubMed 18073546Hosokawa K, Shime N, Kato Y, Hashimoto S. A randomized trial of ultrasound image-based skin surface marking versus real-time ultrasound-guided internal jugular vein catheterization in infants. Anesthesiology. 2007 Nov;107(5):720-4. doi: 10.1097/01.anes.0000287024.19704.96.
- Background: PubMed 22307320American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Central Venous Access; Rupp SM, Apfelbaum JL, Blitt C, Caplan RA, Connis RT, Domino KB, Fleisher LA, Grant S, Mark JB, Morray JP, Nickinovich DG, Tung A. Practice guidelines for central venous access: a report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Central Venous Access. Anesthesiology. 2012 Mar;116(3):539-73. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31823c9569. No abstract available.
Related trials for Surgery
Active, not recruiting
Shockwave™ vs Surgical Endarterectomy for Calcified Severe Common Femoral Artery Stenosis: Comparison of Efficacy, Safety and Long-Term Outcomes
Common Femoral Artery Stenosis, Calcification; Heart
RecruitingObservational study
Comparison of Hemodynamic Responses During Anesthesia Induction Using Eleveld and Schnider
Spinal (Fusion) Surgery, Total Intravenous Anesthesia
RecruitingPhase 1
Serial Amnioinfusions as Regenerative Therapy for Pulmonary Hypoplasia
Renal Failure Congenital, Congenital Renal Anomaly Nos
RecruitingPhase 2
Proton Spatially Fractionated Radiotherapy or Photon Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Combination With Pembrolizumab Before Surgery for the Treatment of Locally Advanced and Radiation-Naive Locoregionally Recurrent Oral Cavity Cancer, OSPRI Trial
Locally Advanced Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma, Locally Recurrent Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Testing the Role of DNA Released From Tumor Cells Into the Blood in Guiding the Use of Immunotherapy After Surgical Removal of the Bladder, Kidney, Ureter, and Urethra for Urothelial Cancer Treatment, MODERN Study
Muscle Invasive Bladder Urothelial Carcinoma, Muscle Invasive Renal Pelvis Urothelial Carcinoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Pierre ALBALADEJO, MD principal investigator
University Hospital, Grenoble
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Use of ultrasound with active GPS and Use of ultrasound with inactive GPS in people with Surgery, run by University Hospital, Grenoble at 1 site in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Jun 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Time required for CVC insertion (time frame: at the end of the insertion of the guide wire, an average of one and a half minutes after the beginning of the procedure). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02231528, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Jun 2015.