Prostate CancerNCT02232685
Whole Body Bone Scan vs 18F-Choline PET/CT in Prostate Cancer
A study testing 18F-Choline PET/CT in people with Prostate Cancer, run by Odense University Hospital at 1 site in Denmark.
Trial summary
Prostate cancer is currently the leading newly diagnosed cancer in the industrialized world. Treatment of prostate cancer is highly dependent on the stage of the disease. Current methods for staging are known to be inaccurate. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age, men only
- Conditions the study is for
- Prostate Cancer
- What is being tested?
- 18F-Choline PET/CT
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 143 participants
- Where
- 1 siteDenmark
- Study dates
- Sep 2014to Jul 2016
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- Men only
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Newly diagnosed, histologically verified PCa and
- Written consent and
- PSA ≥ 20 ng/mL and/or
- Gleason score > 6 and/or
- cT-stage ≥ cT2c
Who cannot join
- Withdrawal of consent or
- Other active malign disease
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Whole Body Bone Scan vs 18F-Choline PET/CT, Better Detection of Bone Metastases in Prostate Cancer Patients, PROSTAGE I
Prostate cancer is currently the leading newly diagnosed cancer in the industrialized world. Treatment of prostate cancer is highly dependent on the stage of the disease. Current methods for staging are known to be inaccurate. Prior studies from our department suggest that PET/CT is useful in staging of bone metastases in patients with prostate cancer. The aim of this study is to test the usefulness of Choline PET/CT for the staging of bone metastases compared to current standard methods in patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer.
Better initial staging will result in better treatment of the individual patient. If we are able to develop a more accurate method of staging patients with undetected metastases on current staging will be spared of the side-effects associated with current treatment - impotence, incontinence, radiation damage etc.
Read the detailed description
- Introduction. Cancer of the prostate (PCa) is currently the leading newly diagnosed cancer and the second most common cause of cancer deaths among men in the industrialized world . In Denmark alone more than 4000 men are yearly diagnosed with PCa . As PCa primarily affects elderly patients, one can assume that PCa will become one of the most important medical issues in the developed world due to the already high incidence combined with a growing population of elderly men. The aetiology of the disease is not well understood. In its most common form PCa evolves from the glandular tissue of the prostate. Metastatic spread will most commonly happen as lymphogenous spread to the regional lymph nodes or as haematogenous spread to the red bone marrow . Intended curative treatment of PCa is associated with considerable side effects, in particular incontinence, impotence and radiation damage to the surrounding tissues. Furthermore, over 30% of patients with organ-confined disease, which was treated with radical prostatectomy, will have biochemical relapse within 10 years . Relapse may be due to local recurrent disease suggesting poor surgical quality or poor initial staging with undetected metastases at the time of treatment. At diagnosis patients are stratified as having low, intermediary or high risk of dissieminatio according to D'Amico. Patients with intermediate or high risk of dissemination will be examined further with whole-body bone scintigraphy (WBS) and pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND).
- Background. 2.1. Current staging and limitations. WBS has been the examination of choice for evaluation of potential dissemination to bone. WBS utilizes 99mTc-labeled methylene diphosphonate (99mTc-MDP) that binds to the bone matrix formed by the osteoblasts. Gamma cameras detect the γ-radiation emitted by the decaying tracer thereby creating a 2-dimentional image depicting local osteoblast activity . Several limitations apply to the use of WBS in staging of patients with PCa. Sensitivity has reported as low as 39% in lesion-based analysis in patients with a low number of lesions . This combines with a low sensitivity due to many equivocal lesions caused by other bone pathology than metastasis. Sensitivity and specificity is improved by the use of single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), where the same tracer as with WBS is used to generate a three-dimensional image using a rotating gamma camera. This method also gives better anatomical information on the exact position of a potential metastasis. The examination of choice for the evaluation of potential metastases to lymph nodes is extended PLND . This procedure is done either prior to radiotherapy or during prostatectomy in patients with intermediate or high risk of dissemination. The optimal extent of the dissection is debated. The extended PLND performed at our institution includes the nodes in the obturator fossa, the nodes over the external iliac artery and vein, the nodes around the internal iliac artery and the nodes along the common iliac artery up to the crossing of the ureter. This dissection is assumed to include approximately 75% of lymph nodes known to harbor primary prostatic lymph node metastases . Extended PLND is surgically demanding with risk of lymphocele formation, infectious complications and severe bleeding due the lymph nodes' close proximity to the large vessels in the pelvis. All in all extended PLND is perhaps the best option for lymph node staging of PCa but it cannot be considered as optimal due to the above-mentioned issues. 2.2 Positron Emission Tomography (PET). Positron Emission Tomography combined with Computerized Tomography (PET/CT) is a well-established tool in diagnosing and staging of several types of cancer . PET is an imaging technique where pairs of gamma rays emitted by positron-emitting radionuclide tracer are detected, producing a three-dimensional image of tracer concentration based on the amount of gamma rays emitted. The radioactive tracer is coupled to a biologically active molecule depending on the organ or metabolic process of interest . These images can then be fused with CT to create a combined functional and high-resolution anatomical image. Several tracers have been developed for use in cancer diagnostics and staging. As of now, PET/CT has no generally accepted role in the diagnosing or staging of PCa neither in Europe nor in the US . 2.2.1 Choline. Choline is a precursor for phosphatidylcholine, a phospholipid that is integrated in the cell membrane making it a marker for cell membrane turnover and metabolism . 11C-Choline was first used as a PET tracer in 1997 . Since then many studies have been performed with 11C-Choline and later 18F-Choline (FCH) having approximately the same properties as 11C-Choline, but with a longer half-life (110 min vs. 20 min) making it more versatile in every-day use. A recent study from our department tested the use of FCH-PET/CT in detecting lymph node metastasis in 210 patients with PCa . The study concluded that FCH-PET/CT was not ideally suited for lymph node staging but could give additional information about bone metastasis. Several other investigators have also implied this , . A likely reason for the better detection of metastasis to the bone is that bone metastasis in an early stage is actually bone-marrow metastases rather than bone matrix metastasis and that it most likely that bone-marrow metastases proceed to bone matrix metastases. These will not be detectable by WBS (and probably not by CT and MRI either). Larger prospective series on the use of FCH-PET/CT for imaging of bone metastasis in PCa-patients have not yet been produced.
- Trial objective. To compare the diagnostic accuracy in detecting bone metastases of WBS, SPECT and FCH PET/CT in 280 patients with newly diagnosed PCa with intermediate or high risk of disseminated disease
- Method. The patients will have two scans performed, first one with two acquisitions using only one administration of tracer i.e. a WBS followed by a SPECT acquisition and on another day a FCH-PET/CT. Image acquisition will be performed approximately 60 min after intravenous injection of the tracer.
The scans are performed in random order within three weeks and the images interpreted by a specialist in nuclear medicine and a specialist in radiology. Patients who already have had WBS performed will only have a FCH-PET/CT performed.
Images are interpreted based on visual evaluation with supplementary measurements of Standardized uptake values (SUV).
In case of agreement between the scans, the patient will proceed to clinical treatment as usual. In case of disagreement between the three modalities a MRI will be performed on the lesion of interest. If the results after MRI are still inconclusive a bone biopsy with emphasis on getting marrow tissue as well as bone matrix, will be performed. This will in many cases not be possible due to the size of the lesion and in these cases MRI will serve as reference standard.
- Conditions
- Prostate Cancer
- Being tested
- 18F-Choline PET/CT
- Keywords
- Prostate cancer, Staging, PET/CT
- Medical subject headings
- Prostatic Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
18F-Choline PET/CTDevice
18F-Choline PET/CT
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Choline PET/CT | Experimental | 18F-Choline PET/CT Receives: Device: 18F-Choline PET/CT |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Metastases to bone (yes/no)
Measured: 1 day (At the time of scan interpretation)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 Sep 2014 (estimated)
- Study startSep 2014
- Primary completionJul 2016
- Study completionJul 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Prostate CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Odense University HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 143 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Odense University Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Mike Allan Mortensen, Odense University Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02232685
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- MAM_PROSTAGE1
- Status last verified
- Oct 2016
- First submitted
- 3 Sep 2014
- Last updated
- 11 Oct 2016
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 Oct 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Whole Body Bone Scan vs 18F-Choline PET/CT, Better Detection of Bone Metastases in Prostate Cancer Patients, PROSTAGE I
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02232685
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MAM_PROSTAGE1
- Conditions
- Prostate Cancer
- Keywords
- Prostate cancer, Staging, PET/CT
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 143 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Odense University HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Sep 2014
- Primary completion
- Jul 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jul 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 5 Sep 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Prostate cancer is currently the leading newly diagnosed cancer in the industrialized world. Treatment of prostate cancer is highly dependent on the stage of the disease. Current methods for staging are known to be inaccurate. Prior studies from our department suggest that PET/CT is useful in staging of bone metastases in patients with prostate cancer. The aim of this study is to test the usefulness of Choline PET/CT for the staging of bone metastases compared to current standard methods in patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer.
Better initial staging will result in better treatment of the individual patient. If we are able to develop a more accurate method of staging patients with undetected metastases on current staging will be spared of the side-effects associated with current treatment - impotence, incontinence, radiation damage etc.
Detailed description
- Introduction. Cancer of the prostate (PCa) is currently the leading newly diagnosed cancer and the second most common cause of cancer deaths among men in the industrialized world . In Denmark alone more than 4000 men are yearly diagnosed with PCa . As PCa primarily affects elderly patients, one can assume that PCa will become one of the most important medical issues in the developed world due to the already high incidence combined with a growing population of elderly men. The aetiology of the disease is not well understood. In its most common form PCa evolves from the glandular tissue of the prostate. Metastatic spread will most commonly happen as lymphogenous spread to the regional lymph nodes or as haematogenous spread to the red bone marrow . Intended curative treatment of PCa is associated with considerable side effects, in particular incontinence, impotence and radiation damage to the surrounding tissues. Furthermore, over 30% of patients with organ-confined disease, which was treated with radical prostatectomy, will have biochemical relapse within 10 years . Relapse may be due to local recurrent disease suggesting poor surgical quality or poor initial staging with undetected metastases at the time of treatment. At diagnosis patients are stratified as having low, intermediary or high risk of dissieminatio according to D'Amico. Patients with intermediate or high risk of dissemination will be examined further with whole-body bone scintigraphy (WBS) and pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND).
- Background. 2.1. Current staging and limitations. WBS has been the examination of choice for evaluation of potential dissemination to bone. WBS utilizes 99mTc-labeled methylene diphosphonate (99mTc-MDP) that binds to the bone matrix formed by the osteoblasts. Gamma cameras detect the γ-radiation emitted by the decaying tracer thereby creating a 2-dimentional image depicting local osteoblast activity . Several limitations apply to the use of WBS in staging of patients with PCa. Sensitivity has reported as low as 39% in lesion-based analysis in patients with a low number of lesions . This combines with a low sensitivity due to many equivocal lesions caused by other bone pathology than metastasis. Sensitivity and specificity is improved by the use of single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), where the same tracer as with WBS is used to generate a three-dimensional image using a rotating gamma camera. This method also gives better anatomical information on the exact position of a potential metastasis. The examination of choice for the evaluation of potential metastases to lymph nodes is extended PLND . This procedure is done either prior to radiotherapy or during prostatectomy in patients with intermediate or high risk of dissemination. The optimal extent of the dissection is debated. The extended PLND performed at our institution includes the nodes in the obturator fossa, the nodes over the external iliac artery and vein, the nodes around the internal iliac artery and the nodes along the common iliac artery up to the crossing of the ureter. This dissection is assumed to include approximately 75% of lymph nodes known to harbor primary prostatic lymph node metastases . Extended PLND is surgically demanding with risk of lymphocele formation, infectious complications and severe bleeding due the lymph nodes' close proximity to the large vessels in the pelvis. All in all extended PLND is perhaps the best option for lymph node staging of PCa but it cannot be considered as optimal due to the above-mentioned issues. 2.2 Positron Emission Tomography (PET). Positron Emission Tomography combined with Computerized Tomography (PET/CT) is a well-established tool in diagnosing and staging of several types of cancer . PET is an imaging technique where pairs of gamma rays emitted by positron-emitting radionuclide tracer are detected, producing a three-dimensional image of tracer concentration based on the amount of gamma rays emitted. The radioactive tracer is coupled to a biologically active molecule depending on the organ or metabolic process of interest . These images can then be fused with CT to create a combined functional and high-resolution anatomical image. Several tracers have been developed for use in cancer diagnostics and staging. As of now, PET/CT has no generally accepted role in the diagnosing or staging of PCa neither in Europe nor in the US . 2.2.1 Choline. Choline is a precursor for phosphatidylcholine, a phospholipid that is integrated in the cell membrane making it a marker for cell membrane turnover and metabolism . 11C-Choline was first used as a PET tracer in 1997 . Since then many studies have been performed with 11C-Choline and later 18F-Choline (FCH) having approximately the same properties as 11C-Choline, but with a longer half-life (110 min vs. 20 min) making it more versatile in every-day use. A recent study from our department tested the use of FCH-PET/CT in detecting lymph node metastasis in 210 patients with PCa . The study concluded that FCH-PET/CT was not ideally suited for lymph node staging but could give additional information about bone metastasis. Several other investigators have also implied this , . A likely reason for the better detection of metastasis to the bone is that bone metastasis in an early stage is actually bone-marrow metastases rather than bone matrix metastasis and that it most likely that bone-marrow metastases proceed to bone matrix metastases. These will not be detectable by WBS (and probably not by CT and MRI either). Larger prospective series on the use of FCH-PET/CT for imaging of bone metastasis in PCa-patients have not yet been produced.
- Trial objective. To compare the diagnostic accuracy in detecting bone metastases of WBS, SPECT and FCH PET/CT in 280 patients with newly diagnosed PCa with intermediate or high risk of disseminated disease
- Method. The patients will have two scans performed, first one with two acquisitions using only one administration of tracer i.e. a WBS followed by a SPECT acquisition and on another day a FCH-PET/CT. Image acquisition will be performed approximately 60 min after intravenous injection of the tracer.
The scans are performed in random order within three weeks and the images interpreted by a specialist in nuclear medicine and a specialist in radiology. Patients who already have had WBS performed will only have a FCH-PET/CT performed.
Images are interpreted based on visual evaluation with supplementary measurements of Standardized uptake values (SUV).
In case of agreement between the scans, the patient will proceed to clinical treatment as usual. In case of disagreement between the three modalities a MRI will be performed on the lesion of interest. If the results after MRI are still inconclusive a bone biopsy with emphasis on getting marrow tissue as well as bone matrix, will be performed. This will in many cases not be possible due to the size of the lesion and in these cases MRI will serve as reference standard.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Choline PET/CT | Experimental | Device: 18F-Choline PET/CT18F-Choline PET/CT |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- Male only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Newly diagnosed, histologically verified PCa and
- Written consent and
- PSA ≥ 20 ng/mL and/or
- Gleason score > 6 and/or
- cT-stage ≥ cT2c
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Withdrawal of consent or
- Other active malign disease
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| 18F-Choline PET/CT18F-Choline PET/CT | Device | Choline PET/CT |
Primary outcome
Metastases to bone (yes/no)
Time frame: 1 day (At the time of scan interpretation)
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 Oct 2016.
Related trials for Prostate Cancer
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Assessment of Intelligent Algorithms for Detection, Diagnosis and Risk Stratification of Tumors of the Kidney and Prostate
Kidney Cancers, Prostate Cancer
Not yet recruiting
WATER IV PCa (AS Sub-study)
Localized Prostate Cancer
Recruiting
The Application of Somatosensory Interactive Pelvic Floor Muscle Training for Stress Urinary Incontinence in Men Underwent Radical Prostatectomy
Prostate Cancer (Post Prostatectomy)
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study of [225Ac]Ac-AKY-2519 in Patients With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
Castration Resistant Metastatic Prostate Cancer, Prostate Cancer
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Natural History Study of Early Life Exposures in Agriculture (ELEA)
Prostate Cancer, Leukemia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing 18F-Choline PET/CT in people with Prostate Cancer, run by Odense University Hospital at 1 site in Denmark.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Oct 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Metastases to bone (yes/no) (time frame: 1 day (At the time of scan interpretation)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Oct 2016.