AzTrials
AzTrials

Crohn's DiseasePhase 3NCT02240121

One Year Study of Rifaximin Delayed Release (DR) Tablets in Crohn's Disease

A Phase 3 study testing Rifaximin EIR in people with Crohn's Disease, run by Bausch Health Americas, Inc. at 72 sites in United States.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The primary objective is to determine the efficacy of rifaximin DR also referred to as Extended Intestinal Release (EIR) tablets vs. placebo for the induction of clinical remission and endoscopic response following 16 weeks of treatment in participants presenting with active moderate Crohn's disease. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Crohn's Disease
What is being tested?
Rifaximin EIR
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
80 participants
Where
72 sitesUnited States
Study dates
21 Aug 2014to 16 Aug 2017
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Major Inclusion Criteria:

  • Moderate, non-fistulizing Crohn's disease in the ileum and/or colon prior to randomization; and a SES-CD score of ≥7 (confirmed by centralized endoscopy reading).
  • During the screening period, the participant will need to have certain average daily scores for abdominal pain and average number of liquid/very soft stools.

Major Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant or lactating females. Females of childbearing (reproductive) potential must have a negative serum pregnancy test at screening and agree to use a highly effective method(s) of contraception throughout their participation in the study. Diagnosis of ulcerative or indeterminate colitis.
  • Diagnosis of Celiac Disease.
  • Bowel surgery within 12 weeks prior to screening and/or has surgery planned or deemed likely for Crohn's disease during the study period.
  • Presence of an ileostomy or colostomy.
  • Known fixed symptomatic stenosis/stricture of the small or large bowel.
  • Had more than one segmental colonic resection.
  • Had more than 3 small bowel resections or symptoms associated with short bowel syndrome.
  • Current evidence of peritonitis.
  • History or evidence of colonic mucosal dysplasia.
  • History or evidence of adenomatous colonic polyps that have not been removed.
  • Unwilling to be tapered off corticosteroids by Week 8 or the participant is known by the Investigator to be steroid-dependent.
  • Has used a biologic within 12 weeks of randomization.
  • Used cyclosporine, tacrolimus, sirolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, or similar drugs within 8 weeks prior to randomization.
  • Had rectal administration of 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) or corticosteroid enemas/foams/ suppositories within 2 weeks prior to screening visit.

Trial locations and contacts

72 sites in 1 country.

72 sites in 1 country

United States72 sites
  • Study site

    Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109

  • Study site

    Arlington, Texas, 76012

  • Study site

    Atlanta, Georgia, 30342

  • Study site

    Bakersfield, California, 93301

  • Study site

    Bellevue, Washington, 98004

  • Study site

    Boynton Beach, Florida, 33426

  • Study site

    Bristol, Connecticut, 06010

  • Study site

    Brooklyn, New York, 11235

  • Study site

    Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599

  • Study site

    Charleston, South Carolina, 29406

  • Study site

    Chesterfield, Michigan, 48047

  • Study site

    Chevy Chase, Maryland, 20815

  • Study site

    Clinton, Utah, 84015

  • Study site

    Columbus, Georgia, 31909

  • Study site

    Coral Springs, Florida, 33071

  • Study site

    Danbury, Connecticut, 06810

  • Study site

    Denver, Colorado, 80045

  • Study site

    Evansville, Indiana, 47714

  • Study site

    Flushing, New York, 11355

  • Study site

    Fort Worth, Texas, 76104

  • Study site

    Great Neck, New York, 11021

  • Study site

    Greenville, South Carolina, 29615

  • Study site

    Hialeah, Florida, 33012

  • Study site

    Homestead, Florida, 33030

  • Study site

    Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202

  • Study site

    Jackson, Mississippi, 39202

  • Study site

    Jacksonville, North Carolina, 28546

  • Study site

    Kingsport, Tennessee, 37660

  • Study site

    Kinston, North Carolina, 28501

  • Study site

    Largo, Florida, 33777

  • Study site

    Leesburg, Virginia, 20176

  • Study site

    Little Rock, Arkansas, 72205

  • Study site

    Little Rock, Arkansas, 72211

  • Study site

    Los Angeles, California, 90067

  • Study site

    Madison, Wisconsin, 53705-2281

  • Study site

    Madisonville, Kentucky, 42431

  • Study site

    Marlborough, Massachusetts, 01752

  • Study site

    Marlton, New Jersey, 08053

  • Study site

    Mentor, Ohio, 44060

  • Study site

    Mexico, Missouri, 65265

  • Study site

    Miami, Florida, 33165

  • Study site

    Mission Hills, California, 91345

  • Study site

    Nashville, Tennessee, 37211

  • Study site

    New York, New York, 10016

  • Study site

    North Little Rock, Arkansas, 72117

  • Study site

    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73104

  • Study site

    Orange, California, 92868

  • Study site

    Orangeburg, South Carolina, 29118

  • Study site

    Orlando, Florida, 32803

  • Study site

    Orlando, Florida, 32806

  • Study site

    Orlando, Florida, 32825

  • Study site

    Pasadena, Texas, 77505

  • Study site

    Plant City, Florida, 33563

  • Study site

    Poughkeepsie, New York, 12601

  • Study site

    Pratt, Kansas, 67124

  • Study site

    Raleigh, North Carolina, 27612

  • Study site

    Reno, Nevada, 89511

  • Study site

    Salisbury, North Carolina, 28144

  • Study site

    San Carlos, California, 94070

  • Study site

    Sayre, Pennsylvania, 18840

  • Study site

    Scottsdale, Arizona, 85260

  • Study site

    Sioux Falls, South Dakota, 57108

  • Study site

    Southlake, Texas, 76092

  • Study site

    Teaneck, New Jersey, 07666

  • Study site

    Torrance, California, 90503

  • Study site

    Towson, Maryland, 21204

  • Study site

    Troy, Michigan, 48098

  • Study site

    Tucson, Arizona, 85712

  • Study site

    Tucson, Arizona, 85724

  • Study site

    Urbana, Illinois, 61801

  • Study site

    Winter Haven, Florida, 33880

  • Study site

    Winter Park, Florida, 32789

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Multicenter, Multiregional, One Year Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Twice Daily Oral Rifaximin Delayed Release Tablets for Induction of Clinical Remission With Endoscopic Response at 16 Weeks Followed by Clinical and Endoscopic Remission at 52 Weeks in Subjects With Active Moderate Crohn's Disease

The primary objective is to determine the efficacy of rifaximin DR also referred to as Extended Intestinal Release (EIR) tablets vs. placebo for the induction of clinical remission and endoscopic response following 16 weeks of treatment in participants presenting with active moderate Crohn's disease. A key secondary objective is to evaluate clinical and endoscopic remission following an additional 36 weeks of treatment.

Read the detailed description

RECD3125 is a double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter, multiregional, 52-week study to assess the efficacy and safety of rifaximin DR tablets for the induction of clinical remission and endoscopic response at 16 weeks followed by clinical and endoscopic remission after 52 weeks of continuous therapy in participants with active moderate Crohn's disease.

Participants will be randomized in a 1:1 allocation to rifaximin or placebo at the beginning of the treatment period and will maintain treatment assignment throughout the duration of the study. Ileocolonoscopy will be performed on all participants at baseline, between Weeks 16 and 17 (end of the Induction Phase), and following completion of the 36-week Long Term Treatment Phase (Week 52).

Conditions
Crohn's Disease
Being tested
Rifaximin EIR, Placebo
Keywords
Crohn's Disease, Rifaximin, Clinical remission with endoscopic response, Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Medical subject headings
Crohn Disease, Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Rifaximin EIRDrug

    Rifaximin EIR tablets will be administered per the dose and schedule specified in the arm.

  • PlaceboDrug

    Placebo matching to rifaximin EIR tablets will be administered per the dose and schedule specified in the arm.

Study groups in NCT02240121
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Rifaximin EIR 800 mgExperimentalParticipants will receive rifaximin EIR 400 milligrams (mg) tablets orally twice daily for 52 weeks.
Receives: Drug: Rifaximin EIR
PlaceboPlacebo comparatorParticipants will receive placebo matching to rifaximin EIR tablets orally twice daily for 52 weeks.
Receives: Drug: Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of Participants Who Achieved Clinical Symptom Remission (From CDAI Item 1) at Week 16

    Clinical symptom remission defined by (1) the total number of liquid/very soft stools for the 7 days prior to the Week 16 visit being ≤ 10 (from CDAI Item 1). CDAI score is a weighted, composite index of 8 items (stool frequency, severity of abdominal pain, degree of general well-being, presence or absence of extraintestinal manifestations including fistula, use or non-use of antidiarrheal agents, presence or absence of abdominal mass, hematocrit, and body weight). Scores range from 0 to approximately 600 with higher scores indicating greater disease severity.

    Measured: Week 16

  2. Number of Participants Who Achieved Clinical Symptom Remission (From CDAI Item 2) at Week 16

    Clinical Symptom Remission defined by (2) an abdominal pain (graded from 0 [less severe]-3 [more severe]) rating of ≤ 1 (from CDAI Item 2) on each day for the 7 days prior to the Week 16 visit. CDAI score is a weighted, composite index of 8 items (stool frequency, severity of abdominal pain, degree of general well-being, presence or absence of extraintestinal manifestations including fistula, use or non-use of antidiarrheal agents, presence or absence of abdominal mass, hematocrit, and body weight). Scores range from 0 to approximately 600 with higher scores indicating greater disease severity.

    Measured: Week 16

  3. Number of Participants Who Achieved Clinical Symptom Remission (From CDAI Item 1 and 2 Both) at Week 16

    Clinical Symptom Remission defined by (1) the total number of liquid/very soft stools for the 7 days prior to the Week 16 visit being ≤ 10 (from CDAI Item 1); and (2) an abdominal pain (graded from 0 [less severe]-3 [more severe]) rating of ≤ 1 (from CDAI Item 2) on each day for the 7 days prior to the Week 16 visit. CDAI score is a weighted, composite index of 8 items (stool frequency, severity of abdominal pain, degree of general well-being, presence or absence of extraintestinal manifestations including fistula, use or non-use of antidiarrheal agents, presence or absence of abdominal mass, hematocrit, and body weight). Scores range from 0 to approximately 600 with higher scores indicating greater disease severity.

    Measured: Week 16

  4. Number of Participants With Endoscopic Response Between Week 16 and 17

    Endoscopic response defined as a ≥ 3-point decrease in the SES-CD from baseline to the SES-CD score obtained between Week 16 and Week 17. SES-CD scores were calculated from centrally-read digital video of ileocolonoscopies performed at baseline and between Week 16 and Week 17. SES-CD is a validated instrument reflecting an endoscopist's global appraisal of mucosal lesions in Crohn's disease. SES-CD grades lesions by location (5 bowel segments: ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, and rectum) using 4 endoscopic variables: ulcer size, extent of ulcerated surface, extent of affected surface, and presence/type of narrowing. The total SES-CD was calculated as the sum of the 4 variables for the 5 bowel segments: rectum, left colon, transverse colon, right colon, and ileum. Scores range from 0 to 60, with higher scores indicating more severe disease.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 16 to 17

  5. Number of Participants Who Achieved Clinical Symptom Remission (From CDAI Item 1) at Week 52

    Clinical symptom remission defined by (1) the total number of liquid/very soft stools for the 7 days prior to the Week 52 visit being ≤ 10 (from CDAI Item 1). CDAI score is a weighted, composite index of 8 items (stool frequency, severity of abdominal pain, degree of general well-being, presence or absence of extraintestinal manifestations including fistula, use or non-use of antidiarrheal agents, presence or absence of abdominal mass, hematocrit, and body weight). Scores range from 0 to approximately 600 with higher scores indicating greater disease severity.

    Measured: Week 52

  6. Number of Participants Who Achieved Clinical Symptom Remission (From CDAI Item 2) at Week 52

    Clinical Symptom Remission defined by (2) an abdominal pain (graded from 0 [less severe]-3 [more severe]) rating of ≤ 1 (from CDAI Item 2) on each day for the 7 days prior to the Week 52 visit. CDAI score is a weighted, composite index of 8 items (stool frequency, severity of abdominal pain, degree of general well-being, presence or absence of extraintestinal manifestations including fistula, use or non-use of antidiarrheal agents, presence or absence of abdominal mass, hematocrit, and body weight). Scores range from 0 to approximately 600 with higher scores indicating greater disease severity.

    Measured: Week 52

  7. Number of Participants Who Achieved Clinical Symptom Remission (From CDAI Item 1 and 2 Both) at Week 52

    Clinical Symptom Remission defined by (1) the total number of liquid/very soft stools for the 7 days prior to the Week 52 visit being ≤ 10 (from CDAI Item 1); and (2) an abdominal pain (graded from 0 [less severe]-3 [more severe]) rating of ≤ 1 (from CDAI Item 2) on each day for the 7 days prior to the Week 52 visit. CDAI score is a weighted, composite index of 8 items (stool frequency, severity of abdominal pain, degree of general well-being, presence or absence of extraintestinal manifestations including fistula, use or non-use of antidiarrheal agents, presence or absence of abdominal mass, hematocrit, and body weight). Scores range from 0 to approximately 600 with higher scores indicating greater disease severity.

    Measured: Week 52

  8. Number of Participants With Endoscopic Response at Week 52

    Endoscopic response defined as a ≥ 3-point decrease in the SES-CD from baseline to the SES-CD score obtained at Week 52. SES-CD is a validated instrument reflecting an endoscopist's global appraisal of mucosal lesions in Crohn's disease. SES-CD grades lesions by location (5 bowel segments: ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, and rectum) using 4 endoscopic variables: ulcer size, extent of ulcerated surface, extent of affected surface, and presence/type of narrowing. The total SES-CD was calculated as the sum of the 4 variables for the 5 bowel segments: rectum, left colon, transverse colon, right colon, and ileum. Scores range from 0 to 60, with higher scores indicating more severe disease.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 52

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Number of Participants Who Achieved Clinical Remission (Defined as CDAI Score of <150) at Week 16

    Clinical remission was defined as a CDAI score of less than 150 points at Week 16. CDAI score is a weighted, composite index of 8 items (stool frequency, severity of abdominal pain, degree of general well-being, presence or absence of extraintestinal manifestations including fistula, use or non-use of antidiarrheal agents, presence or absence of abdominal mass, hematocrit, and body weight). Scores range from 0 to approximately 600 with higher scores indicating greater disease severity.

    Measured: Week 16

  2. Number of Participants Who Achieved Clinical Symptom Remission (From CDAI Item 1 and 2 Both) Over Time

    Clinical Symptom Remission defined by (1) the total number of liquid/very soft stools for the 7 days prior to each clinical visit being ≤ 10 (from CDAI Item 1); and (2) an abdominal pain (graded from 0 [less severe]-3 [more severe]) rating of ≤ 1 (from CDAI Item 2) on each day for the last 7 days prior to each clinic visit in ≥ 80% of the study visits during the 52-week treatment period, including Week 52. CDAI score is a weighted, composite index of 8 items (stool frequency, severity of abdominal pain, degree of general well-being, presence or absence of extraintestinal manifestations including fistula, use or non-use of antidiarrheal agents, presence or absence of abdominal mass, hematocrit, and body weight). Scores range from 0 to approximately 600 with higher scores indicating greater disease severity.

    Measured: From Baseline to Week 52

  3. Number of Participants With SES-CD Score of 0 at Week 52

    SES-CD is a validated instrument reflecting an endoscopist's global appraisal of mucosal lesions in Crohn's disease. SES-CD grades lesions by location (5 bowel segments: ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, and rectum) using 4 endoscopic variables: ulcer size, extent of ulcerated surface, extent of affected surface, and presence/type of narrowing. The total SES-CD was calculated as the sum of the 4 variables for the 5 bowel segments: rectum, left colon, transverse colon, right colon, and ileum. Scores range from 0 to 60, with higher scores indicating more severe disease.

    Measured: Week 52

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted15 Sep 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study start21 Aug 2014
  3. Primary completion16 Aug 2017
  4. Study completion16 Aug 2017

Why it stopped: The study was terminated early due to difficulty in enrollment and lack of clinical study drug access.

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
80 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02240121
Sponsor's protocol ID
RECD3125
Status last verified
Sep 2019
First submitted
11 Sep 2014
Last updated
10 Sep 2019
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Rifaximin EIR in people with Crohn's Disease, run by Bausch Health Americas, Inc. at 72 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Sep 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 72 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 10 Sep 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of Participants Who Achieved Clinical Symptom Remission (From CDAI Item 1) at Week 16 (time frame: Week 16). The study lists 8 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Sep 2019; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 6 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in