Crohn's DiseasePhase 3NCT02240121
One Year Study of Rifaximin Delayed Release (DR) Tablets in Crohn's Disease
A Phase 3 study testing Rifaximin EIR in people with Crohn's Disease, run by Bausch Health Americas, Inc. at 72 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The primary objective is to determine the efficacy of rifaximin DR also referred to as Extended Intestinal Release (EIR) tablets vs. placebo for the induction of clinical remission and endoscopic response following 16 weeks of treatment in participants presenting with active moderate Crohn's disease. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Crohn's Disease
- What is being tested?
- Rifaximin EIR
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 80 participants
- Where
- 72 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 21 Aug 2014to 16 Aug 2017
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Major Inclusion Criteria:
- Moderate, non-fistulizing Crohn's disease in the ileum and/or colon prior to randomization; and a SES-CD score of ≥7 (confirmed by centralized endoscopy reading).
- During the screening period, the participant will need to have certain average daily scores for abdominal pain and average number of liquid/very soft stools.
Major Exclusion Criteria:
- Pregnant or lactating females. Females of childbearing (reproductive) potential must have a negative serum pregnancy test at screening and agree to use a highly effective method(s) of contraception throughout their participation in the study. Diagnosis of ulcerative or indeterminate colitis.
- Diagnosis of Celiac Disease.
- Bowel surgery within 12 weeks prior to screening and/or has surgery planned or deemed likely for Crohn's disease during the study period.
- Presence of an ileostomy or colostomy.
- Known fixed symptomatic stenosis/stricture of the small or large bowel.
- Had more than one segmental colonic resection.
- Had more than 3 small bowel resections or symptoms associated with short bowel syndrome.
- Current evidence of peritonitis.
- History or evidence of colonic mucosal dysplasia.
- History or evidence of adenomatous colonic polyps that have not been removed.
- Unwilling to be tapered off corticosteroids by Week 8 or the participant is known by the Investigator to be steroid-dependent.
- Has used a biologic within 12 weeks of randomization.
- Used cyclosporine, tacrolimus, sirolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, or similar drugs within 8 weeks prior to randomization.
- Had rectal administration of 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) or corticosteroid enemas/foams/ suppositories within 2 weeks prior to screening visit.
Trial locations and contacts
72 sites in 1 country.
72 sites in 1 country
United States72 sites
Study site
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109
Study site
Arlington, Texas, 76012
Study site
Atlanta, Georgia, 30342
Study site
Bakersfield, California, 93301
Study site
Bellevue, Washington, 98004
Study site
Boynton Beach, Florida, 33426
Study site
Bristol, Connecticut, 06010
Study site
Brooklyn, New York, 11235
Study site
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599
Study site
Charleston, South Carolina, 29406
Study site
Chesterfield, Michigan, 48047
Study site
Chevy Chase, Maryland, 20815
Study site
Clinton, Utah, 84015
Study site
Columbus, Georgia, 31909
Study site
Coral Springs, Florida, 33071
Study site
Danbury, Connecticut, 06810
Study site
Denver, Colorado, 80045
Study site
Evansville, Indiana, 47714
Study site
Flushing, New York, 11355
Study site
Fort Worth, Texas, 76104
Study site
Great Neck, New York, 11021
Study site
Greenville, South Carolina, 29615
Study site
Hialeah, Florida, 33012
Study site
Homestead, Florida, 33030
Study site
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202
Study site
Jackson, Mississippi, 39202
Study site
Jacksonville, North Carolina, 28546
Study site
Kingsport, Tennessee, 37660
Study site
Kinston, North Carolina, 28501
Study site
Largo, Florida, 33777
Study site
Leesburg, Virginia, 20176
Study site
Little Rock, Arkansas, 72205
Study site
Little Rock, Arkansas, 72211
Study site
Los Angeles, California, 90067
Study site
Madison, Wisconsin, 53705-2281
Study site
Madisonville, Kentucky, 42431
Study site
Marlborough, Massachusetts, 01752
Study site
Marlton, New Jersey, 08053
Study site
Mentor, Ohio, 44060
Study site
Mexico, Missouri, 65265
Study site
Miami, Florida, 33165
Study site
Mission Hills, California, 91345
Study site
Nashville, Tennessee, 37211
Study site
New York, New York, 10016
Study site
North Little Rock, Arkansas, 72117
Study site
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73104
Study site
Orange, California, 92868
Study site
Orangeburg, South Carolina, 29118
Study site
Orlando, Florida, 32803
Study site
Orlando, Florida, 32806
Study site
Orlando, Florida, 32825
Study site
Pasadena, Texas, 77505
Study site
Plant City, Florida, 33563
Study site
Poughkeepsie, New York, 12601
Study site
Pratt, Kansas, 67124
Study site
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27612
Study site
Reno, Nevada, 89511
Study site
Salisbury, North Carolina, 28144
Study site
San Carlos, California, 94070
Study site
Sayre, Pennsylvania, 18840
Study site
Scottsdale, Arizona, 85260
Study site
Sioux Falls, South Dakota, 57108
Study site
Southlake, Texas, 76092
Study site
Teaneck, New Jersey, 07666
Study site
Torrance, California, 90503
Study site
Towson, Maryland, 21204
Study site
Troy, Michigan, 48098
Study site
Tucson, Arizona, 85712
Study site
Tucson, Arizona, 85724
Study site
Urbana, Illinois, 61801
Study site
Winter Haven, Florida, 33880
Study site
Winter Park, Florida, 32789
About this study
Official title: A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Multicenter, Multiregional, One Year Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Twice Daily Oral Rifaximin Delayed Release Tablets for Induction of Clinical Remission With Endoscopic Response at 16 Weeks Followed by Clinical and Endoscopic Remission at 52 Weeks in Subjects With Active Moderate Crohn's Disease
The primary objective is to determine the efficacy of rifaximin DR also referred to as Extended Intestinal Release (EIR) tablets vs. placebo for the induction of clinical remission and endoscopic response following 16 weeks of treatment in participants presenting with active moderate Crohn's disease. A key secondary objective is to evaluate clinical and endoscopic remission following an additional 36 weeks of treatment.
Read the detailed description
RECD3125 is a double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter, multiregional, 52-week study to assess the efficacy and safety of rifaximin DR tablets for the induction of clinical remission and endoscopic response at 16 weeks followed by clinical and endoscopic remission after 52 weeks of continuous therapy in participants with active moderate Crohn's disease.
Participants will be randomized in a 1:1 allocation to rifaximin or placebo at the beginning of the treatment period and will maintain treatment assignment throughout the duration of the study. Ileocolonoscopy will be performed on all participants at baseline, between Weeks 16 and 17 (end of the Induction Phase), and following completion of the 36-week Long Term Treatment Phase (Week 52).
- Conditions
- Crohn's Disease
- Being tested
- Rifaximin EIR, Placebo
- Keywords
- Crohn's Disease, Rifaximin, Clinical remission with endoscopic response, Inflammatory Bowel Disease
- Medical subject headings
- Crohn Disease, Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Rifaximin EIRDrug
Rifaximin EIR tablets will be administered per the dose and schedule specified in the arm.
PlaceboDrug
Placebo matching to rifaximin EIR tablets will be administered per the dose and schedule specified in the arm.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Rifaximin EIR 800 mg | Experimental | Participants will receive rifaximin EIR 400 milligrams (mg) tablets orally twice daily for 52 weeks. Receives: Drug: Rifaximin EIR |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Participants will receive placebo matching to rifaximin EIR tablets orally twice daily for 52 weeks. Receives: Drug: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Participants Who Achieved Clinical Symptom Remission (From CDAI Item 1) at Week 16
Clinical symptom remission defined by (1) the total number of liquid/very soft stools for the 7 days prior to the Week 16 visit being ≤ 10 (from CDAI Item 1). CDAI score is a weighted, composite index of 8 items (stool frequency, severity of abdominal pain, degree of general well-being, presence or absence of extraintestinal manifestations including fistula, use or non-use of antidiarrheal agents, presence or absence of abdominal mass, hematocrit, and body weight). Scores range from 0 to approximately 600 with higher scores indicating greater disease severity.
Measured: Week 16
Number of Participants Who Achieved Clinical Symptom Remission (From CDAI Item 2) at Week 16
Clinical Symptom Remission defined by (2) an abdominal pain (graded from 0 [less severe]-3 [more severe]) rating of ≤ 1 (from CDAI Item 2) on each day for the 7 days prior to the Week 16 visit. CDAI score is a weighted, composite index of 8 items (stool frequency, severity of abdominal pain, degree of general well-being, presence or absence of extraintestinal manifestations including fistula, use or non-use of antidiarrheal agents, presence or absence of abdominal mass, hematocrit, and body weight). Scores range from 0 to approximately 600 with higher scores indicating greater disease severity.
Measured: Week 16
Number of Participants Who Achieved Clinical Symptom Remission (From CDAI Item 1 and 2 Both) at Week 16
Clinical Symptom Remission defined by (1) the total number of liquid/very soft stools for the 7 days prior to the Week 16 visit being ≤ 10 (from CDAI Item 1); and (2) an abdominal pain (graded from 0 [less severe]-3 [more severe]) rating of ≤ 1 (from CDAI Item 2) on each day for the 7 days prior to the Week 16 visit. CDAI score is a weighted, composite index of 8 items (stool frequency, severity of abdominal pain, degree of general well-being, presence or absence of extraintestinal manifestations including fistula, use or non-use of antidiarrheal agents, presence or absence of abdominal mass, hematocrit, and body weight). Scores range from 0 to approximately 600 with higher scores indicating greater disease severity.
Measured: Week 16
Number of Participants With Endoscopic Response Between Week 16 and 17
Endoscopic response defined as a ≥ 3-point decrease in the SES-CD from baseline to the SES-CD score obtained between Week 16 and Week 17. SES-CD scores were calculated from centrally-read digital video of ileocolonoscopies performed at baseline and between Week 16 and Week 17. SES-CD is a validated instrument reflecting an endoscopist's global appraisal of mucosal lesions in Crohn's disease. SES-CD grades lesions by location (5 bowel segments: ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, and rectum) using 4 endoscopic variables: ulcer size, extent of ulcerated surface, extent of affected surface, and presence/type of narrowing. The total SES-CD was calculated as the sum of the 4 variables for the 5 bowel segments: rectum, left colon, transverse colon, right colon, and ileum. Scores range from 0 to 60, with higher scores indicating more severe disease.
Measured: Baseline, Week 16 to 17
Number of Participants Who Achieved Clinical Symptom Remission (From CDAI Item 1) at Week 52
Clinical symptom remission defined by (1) the total number of liquid/very soft stools for the 7 days prior to the Week 52 visit being ≤ 10 (from CDAI Item 1). CDAI score is a weighted, composite index of 8 items (stool frequency, severity of abdominal pain, degree of general well-being, presence or absence of extraintestinal manifestations including fistula, use or non-use of antidiarrheal agents, presence or absence of abdominal mass, hematocrit, and body weight). Scores range from 0 to approximately 600 with higher scores indicating greater disease severity.
Measured: Week 52
Number of Participants Who Achieved Clinical Symptom Remission (From CDAI Item 2) at Week 52
Clinical Symptom Remission defined by (2) an abdominal pain (graded from 0 [less severe]-3 [more severe]) rating of ≤ 1 (from CDAI Item 2) on each day for the 7 days prior to the Week 52 visit. CDAI score is a weighted, composite index of 8 items (stool frequency, severity of abdominal pain, degree of general well-being, presence or absence of extraintestinal manifestations including fistula, use or non-use of antidiarrheal agents, presence or absence of abdominal mass, hematocrit, and body weight). Scores range from 0 to approximately 600 with higher scores indicating greater disease severity.
Measured: Week 52
Number of Participants Who Achieved Clinical Symptom Remission (From CDAI Item 1 and 2 Both) at Week 52
Clinical Symptom Remission defined by (1) the total number of liquid/very soft stools for the 7 days prior to the Week 52 visit being ≤ 10 (from CDAI Item 1); and (2) an abdominal pain (graded from 0 [less severe]-3 [more severe]) rating of ≤ 1 (from CDAI Item 2) on each day for the 7 days prior to the Week 52 visit. CDAI score is a weighted, composite index of 8 items (stool frequency, severity of abdominal pain, degree of general well-being, presence or absence of extraintestinal manifestations including fistula, use or non-use of antidiarrheal agents, presence or absence of abdominal mass, hematocrit, and body weight). Scores range from 0 to approximately 600 with higher scores indicating greater disease severity.
Measured: Week 52
Number of Participants With Endoscopic Response at Week 52
Endoscopic response defined as a ≥ 3-point decrease in the SES-CD from baseline to the SES-CD score obtained at Week 52. SES-CD is a validated instrument reflecting an endoscopist's global appraisal of mucosal lesions in Crohn's disease. SES-CD grades lesions by location (5 bowel segments: ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, and rectum) using 4 endoscopic variables: ulcer size, extent of ulcerated surface, extent of affected surface, and presence/type of narrowing. The total SES-CD was calculated as the sum of the 4 variables for the 5 bowel segments: rectum, left colon, transverse colon, right colon, and ileum. Scores range from 0 to 60, with higher scores indicating more severe disease.
Measured: Baseline, Week 52
Secondary outcomes (3)
Number of Participants Who Achieved Clinical Remission (Defined as CDAI Score of <150) at Week 16
Clinical remission was defined as a CDAI score of less than 150 points at Week 16. CDAI score is a weighted, composite index of 8 items (stool frequency, severity of abdominal pain, degree of general well-being, presence or absence of extraintestinal manifestations including fistula, use or non-use of antidiarrheal agents, presence or absence of abdominal mass, hematocrit, and body weight). Scores range from 0 to approximately 600 with higher scores indicating greater disease severity.
Measured: Week 16
Number of Participants Who Achieved Clinical Symptom Remission (From CDAI Item 1 and 2 Both) Over Time
Clinical Symptom Remission defined by (1) the total number of liquid/very soft stools for the 7 days prior to each clinical visit being ≤ 10 (from CDAI Item 1); and (2) an abdominal pain (graded from 0 [less severe]-3 [more severe]) rating of ≤ 1 (from CDAI Item 2) on each day for the last 7 days prior to each clinic visit in ≥ 80% of the study visits during the 52-week treatment period, including Week 52. CDAI score is a weighted, composite index of 8 items (stool frequency, severity of abdominal pain, degree of general well-being, presence or absence of extraintestinal manifestations including fistula, use or non-use of antidiarrheal agents, presence or absence of abdominal mass, hematocrit, and body weight). Scores range from 0 to approximately 600 with higher scores indicating greater disease severity.
Measured: From Baseline to Week 52
Number of Participants With SES-CD Score of 0 at Week 52
SES-CD is a validated instrument reflecting an endoscopist's global appraisal of mucosal lesions in Crohn's disease. SES-CD grades lesions by location (5 bowel segments: ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, and rectum) using 4 endoscopic variables: ulcer size, extent of ulcerated surface, extent of affected surface, and presence/type of narrowing. The total SES-CD was calculated as the sum of the 4 variables for the 5 bowel segments: rectum, left colon, transverse colon, right colon, and ileum. Scores range from 0 to 60, with higher scores indicating more severe disease.
Measured: Week 52
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Sep 2014 (estimated)
- Study start21 Aug 2014
- Primary completion16 Aug 2017
- Study completion16 Aug 2017
Why it stopped: The study was terminated early due to difficulty in enrollment and lack of clinical study drug access.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Crohn's DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Bausch Health Americas, Inc.The sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 80 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Bausch Health Americas, Inc.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Salix Pharmaceuticals, Inc. a division of Bausch Health US, LLC
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Lindsey Mathew, Study director, Bausch Health Americas, Inc.
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02240121
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- RECD3125
- Status last verified
- Sep 2019
- First submitted
- 11 Sep 2014
- Last updated
- 10 Sep 2019
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Sep 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Multicenter, Multiregional, One Year Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Twice Daily Oral Rifaximin Delayed Release Tablets for Induction of Clinical Remission With Endoscopic Response at 16 Weeks Followed by Clinical and Endoscopic Remission at 52 Weeks in Subjects With Active Moderate Crohn's Disease
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02240121
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- RECD3125
- Conditions
- Crohn's Disease
- Keywords
- Crohn's Disease, Rifaximin, Clinical remission with endoscopic response, Inflammatory Bowel Disease
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: The study was terminated early due to difficulty in enrollment and lack of clinical study drug access.
- Enrolment
- 80 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Bausch Health Americas, Inc.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Salix Pharmaceuticals, Inc. a division of Bausch Health US, LLC
- Study start
- 21 Aug 2014 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 16 Aug 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- 16 Aug 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 15 Sep 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 10 Sep 2019
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The primary objective is to determine the efficacy of rifaximin DR also referred to as Extended Intestinal Release (EIR) tablets vs. placebo for the induction of clinical remission and endoscopic response following 16 weeks of treatment in participants presenting with active moderate Crohn's disease. A key secondary objective is to evaluate clinical and endoscopic remission following an additional 36 weeks of treatment.
Detailed description
RECD3125 is a double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter, multiregional, 52-week study to assess the efficacy and safety of rifaximin DR tablets for the induction of clinical remission and endoscopic response at 16 weeks followed by clinical and endoscopic remission after 52 weeks of continuous therapy in participants with active moderate Crohn's disease.
Participants will be randomized in a 1:1 allocation to rifaximin or placebo at the beginning of the treatment period and will maintain treatment assignment throughout the duration of the study. Ileocolonoscopy will be performed on all participants at baseline, between Weeks 16 and 17 (end of the Induction Phase), and following completion of the 36-week Long Term Treatment Phase (Week 52).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Rifaximin EIR 800 mg | Experimental | Drug: Rifaximin EIRParticipants will receive rifaximin EIR 400 milligrams (mg) tablets orally twice daily for 52 weeks. |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: PlaceboParticipants will receive placebo matching to rifaximin EIR tablets orally twice daily for 52 weeks. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Rifaximin EIRRifaximin EIR tablets will be administered per the dose and schedule specified in the arm. | Drug | Rifaximin EIR 800 mg |
| PlaceboPlacebo matching to rifaximin EIR tablets will be administered per the dose and schedule specified in the arm. | Drug | Placebo |
Primary outcome
Number of Participants Who Achieved Clinical Symptom Remission (From CDAI Item 1) at Week 16
Time frame: Week 16
Clinical symptom remission defined by (1) the total number of liquid/very soft stools for the 7 days prior to the Week 16 visit being ≤ 10 (from CDAI Item 1). CDAI score is a weighted, composite index of 8 items (stool frequency, severity of abdominal pain, degree of general well-being, presence or absence of extraintestinal manifestations including fistula, use or non-use of antidiarrheal agents, presence or absence of abdominal mass, hematocrit, and body weight). Scores range from 0 to approximately 600 with higher scores indicating greater disease severity.
Number of Participants Who Achieved Clinical Symptom Remission (From CDAI Item 2) at Week 16
Time frame: Week 16
Clinical Symptom Remission defined by (2) an abdominal pain (graded from 0 [less severe]-3 [more severe]) rating of ≤ 1 (from CDAI Item 2) on each day for the 7 days prior to the Week 16 visit. CDAI score is a weighted, composite index of 8 items (stool frequency, severity of abdominal pain, degree of general well-being, presence or absence of extraintestinal manifestations including fistula, use or non-use of antidiarrheal agents, presence or absence of abdominal mass, hematocrit, and body weight). Scores range from 0 to approximately 600 with higher scores indicating greater disease severity.
Number of Participants Who Achieved Clinical Symptom Remission (From CDAI Item 1 and 2 Both) at Week 16
Time frame: Week 16
Clinical Symptom Remission defined by (1) the total number of liquid/very soft stools for the 7 days prior to the Week 16 visit being ≤ 10 (from CDAI Item 1); and (2) an abdominal pain (graded from 0 [less severe]-3 [more severe]) rating of ≤ 1 (from CDAI Item 2) on each day for the 7 days prior to the Week 16 visit. CDAI score is a weighted, composite index of 8 items (stool frequency, severity of abdominal pain, degree of general well-being, presence or absence of extraintestinal manifestations including fistula, use or non-use of antidiarrheal agents, presence or absence of abdominal mass, hematocrit, and body weight). Scores range from 0 to approximately 600 with higher scores indicating greater disease severity.
Number of Participants With Endoscopic Response Between Week 16 and 17
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16 to 17
Endoscopic response defined as a ≥ 3-point decrease in the SES-CD from baseline to the SES-CD score obtained between Week 16 and Week 17. SES-CD scores were calculated from centrally-read digital video of ileocolonoscopies performed at baseline and between Week 16 and Week 17. SES-CD is a validated instrument reflecting an endoscopist's global appraisal of mucosal lesions in Crohn's disease. SES-CD grades lesions by location (5 bowel segments: ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, and rectum) using 4 endoscopic variables: ulcer size, extent of ulcerated surface, extent of affected surface, and presence/type of narrowing. The total SES-CD was calculated as the sum of the 4 variables for the 5 bowel segments: rectum, left colon, transverse colon, right colon, and ileum. Scores range from 0 to 60, with higher scores indicating more severe disease.
Number of Participants Who Achieved Clinical Symptom Remission (From CDAI Item 1) at Week 52
Time frame: Week 52
Clinical symptom remission defined by (1) the total number of liquid/very soft stools for the 7 days prior to the Week 52 visit being ≤ 10 (from CDAI Item 1). CDAI score is a weighted, composite index of 8 items (stool frequency, severity of abdominal pain, degree of general well-being, presence or absence of extraintestinal manifestations including fistula, use or non-use of antidiarrheal agents, presence or absence of abdominal mass, hematocrit, and body weight). Scores range from 0 to approximately 600 with higher scores indicating greater disease severity.
Number of Participants Who Achieved Clinical Symptom Remission (From CDAI Item 2) at Week 52
Time frame: Week 52
Clinical Symptom Remission defined by (2) an abdominal pain (graded from 0 [less severe]-3 [more severe]) rating of ≤ 1 (from CDAI Item 2) on each day for the 7 days prior to the Week 52 visit. CDAI score is a weighted, composite index of 8 items (stool frequency, severity of abdominal pain, degree of general well-being, presence or absence of extraintestinal manifestations including fistula, use or non-use of antidiarrheal agents, presence or absence of abdominal mass, hematocrit, and body weight). Scores range from 0 to approximately 600 with higher scores indicating greater disease severity.
Number of Participants Who Achieved Clinical Symptom Remission (From CDAI Item 1 and 2 Both) at Week 52
Time frame: Week 52
Clinical Symptom Remission defined by (1) the total number of liquid/very soft stools for the 7 days prior to the Week 52 visit being ≤ 10 (from CDAI Item 1); and (2) an abdominal pain (graded from 0 [less severe]-3 [more severe]) rating of ≤ 1 (from CDAI Item 2) on each day for the 7 days prior to the Week 52 visit. CDAI score is a weighted, composite index of 8 items (stool frequency, severity of abdominal pain, degree of general well-being, presence or absence of extraintestinal manifestations including fistula, use or non-use of antidiarrheal agents, presence or absence of abdominal mass, hematocrit, and body weight). Scores range from 0 to approximately 600 with higher scores indicating greater disease severity.
Number of Participants With Endoscopic Response at Week 52
Time frame: Baseline, Week 52
Endoscopic response defined as a ≥ 3-point decrease in the SES-CD from baseline to the SES-CD score obtained at Week 52. SES-CD is a validated instrument reflecting an endoscopist's global appraisal of mucosal lesions in Crohn's disease. SES-CD grades lesions by location (5 bowel segments: ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, and rectum) using 4 endoscopic variables: ulcer size, extent of ulcerated surface, extent of affected surface, and presence/type of narrowing. The total SES-CD was calculated as the sum of the 4 variables for the 5 bowel segments: rectum, left colon, transverse colon, right colon, and ileum. Scores range from 0 to 60, with higher scores indicating more severe disease.
3 secondary outcomes
Number of Participants Who Achieved Clinical Remission (Defined as CDAI Score of <150) at Week 16
Time frame: Week 16
Number of Participants Who Achieved Clinical Symptom Remission (From CDAI Item 1 and 2 Both) Over Time
Time frame: From Baseline to Week 52
Number of Participants With SES-CD Score of 0 at Week 52
Time frame: Week 52
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Sep 2019.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Crohn's Disease
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
An Open-label, DDI Study to Investigate the Effects of Duvakitug on the PK of Selected Cytochrome P450 Substrates
Ulcerative Colitis, Crohn's Disease
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Oral N-acetylglucosamine in Crohn's Disease
Crohns Disease
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Assess the Pharmacokinetics, Effectiveness and Safety of Afimkibart for Induction and Maintenance Therapy in Children With Moderately to Severely Active Crohn's Disease
Moderately to Severely Active Crohns Disease
RecruitingObservational study
Longitudinal Immunophenotyping of Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Crohn's Disease
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
A Study of Combination Therapy With Guselkumab and Golimumab in Participants With Moderately to Severely Active Crohn's Disease
Crohn's Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Lindsey Mathew study director
Bausch Health Americas, Inc.
72 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Rifaximin EIR in people with Crohn's Disease, run by Bausch Health Americas, Inc. at 72 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Sep 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 72 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 10 Sep 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Participants Who Achieved Clinical Symptom Remission (From CDAI Item 1) at Week 16 (time frame: Week 16). The study lists 8 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Sep 2019; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 6 Nov 2026.