AzTrials
AzTrials

Occupational ExposureSPHERLNCT02243904

Study for Promotion of Health in Recycling Lead

An observational study of Occupational Exposure, run by KU Leuven at 1 site in Belgium.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Study for Promotion of Health in Recycling Lead (SPHERL) is a prospective 2-year follow-up study of lead workers with exposure levels varying between and within individuals. SPHERL addresses to what extent between-subject differences or within-subject changes in lead exposure may have a measurable impact on blood… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age
Conditions the study is for
Occupational Exposure
How many people
270 participants
Where
1 siteBelgium
Study dates
Aug 2015to 31 Dec 2024
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: Participants will be recruited among the work force employed at lead recycling plants in North America.

Who may be able to join

  • Women and men are eligible.
  • New hires without previous occupational lead exposure who will be performing tasks with lead exposure or current employees without previous occupational lead exposure moving to tasks with exposure.
  • Informed written consent.

Who cannot join

  • Pregnancy.
  • Any serious health condition.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Belgium1 site
  • University of Leuven

    Leuven

Other trials in Belgium

About this study

Study for Promotion of Health in Recycling Lead (SPHERL) is a prospective 2-year follow-up study of lead workers with exposure levels varying between and within individuals. SPHERL addresses to what extent between-subject differences or within-subject changes in lead exposure may have a measurable impact on blood pressure, the cardiovascular system, renal function, the autonomic nervous system, peripheral nervous conduction velocity, and neurocognitive function.

At the beginning of December 2015, 70 participants were included in the study.

Read the detailed description

Background

  • Whether low-level lead exposure impacts on blood pressure, regulation of the cardiovascular system, glomerular or tubular renal function, sympathetic nervous modulation, peripheral nervous conduction velocity, and neurocognitive function remains uncertain.

Study Population

  • SPHERL will enroll 500 lead recycling workers with changing lead exposure, who will be examined at baseline (2014-2015) and followed up at annual intervals for 2 years (2016-2017).

Methods

  • Volunteers eligible for the study are (i) new and existing hires without previous occupational lead exposure who will be performing tasks with or without occupational lead exposure and (ii) existing hires with occupational lead exposure who will be transitioning to job tasks without occupational lead exposure within the next 2 years.
  • Blood lead concentration will be the main biomarker of exposure.
  • The main outcome variables are (i) blood pressure measured conventionally and by ambulatory monitoring, and analyzed as continuous or categorical variable, both cross-sectionally and longitudinally; (ii) indexes of glomerular and tubular renal function, (iii) heart rate variability analyzed in the frequency domain as measure of autonomous sympathetic modulation, (iv) peripheral nerve conductivity, (v) neurocognitive performance, (vi) and quality of life [the EuroQOL five dimensions (EQ-5D) questionnaire].

Expected Outcomes

  • Assuming a 4-fold or higher surge in the blood lead concentration, the study is powered to demonstrate over 2 years an acceleration in the age-related rise of systolic blood pressure by 1 to 4 mm Hg or an increase of the coefficient of multiple determination (R2) from 0.22 to 0.24 by adding the change in the blood lead concentration to models relating changes in blood pressure to three other covariables. The longitudinal design of our study complies with the temporality principle of the Bradford-Hill criteria for assessing possible causality between outcomes and exposure.
Keywords
Autonomic nervous function, Blood pressure, Cardiovascular regulation, Lead, Occupational exposure, Renal function

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT02243904
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Lead exposureNot described

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Annual change in systolic blood pressure as measured by 24-h ambulatory monitoring

    Measured: Baseline, 1 year and 2 years

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. Annual change in central hemodynamics

    Annual changes in the central hemodynamics, including aortic blood pressure, the central systolic augmentation index, and aortic pulse wave velocity

    Measured: Baseline, 1 year and 2 years

  2. Annual change in heart function

    Annual changes in ECG-derived indexes

    Measured: Baseline, 1 year and 2 years

  3. Annual change in renal function

    Annual changes in glomerular and tubular renal function measured on a continuous scale and the incidence of renal dysfunction

    Measured: Baseline, 1 year and 2 years

  4. Annual change in autonomic nervous function

    Annual changes in alterations in the autonomic nervous cardiovascular modulation, as assessed by heart rate variability

    Measured: Baseline, 1 year and 2 years

  5. Annual change in peripheral nervous conduction velocity

    Annual changes in nerve conduction velocity

    Measured: Baseline, 1 year and 2 years

  6. Annual change in neurocognitive performance

    Annual changes in neurocognitive testing

    Measured: Baseline, 1 year and 2 years

  7. Annual change in quality of life

    Annual changes in self-assessed quality of life

    Measured: Baseline, 1 year and 2 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted18 Sep 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study startAug 2015
  3. Primary completion1 Jul 2024 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2024 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
270 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02243904
Sponsor's protocol ID
SPHERL
Acronym
SPHERL
Status last verified
Mar 2020
First submitted
10 Sep 2014
Last updated
3 Mar 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Hara A, Gu YM, Petit T, Liu YP, Jacobs L, Zhang ZY, Yang WY, Jin Y, Thijs L, Wei FF, Nawrot TS, Staessen JA. Study for Promotion of Health in Recycling Lead - Rationale and design. Blood Press. 2015 Jun;24(3):147-57. doi: 10.3109/08037051.2014.996409. Epub 2015 Jan 26.

    PubMed 25620211
  • Yu YL, An DW, Yang WY, Verhamme P, Allegaert K, Nawrot TS, Staessen JA. Blood pressure and renal function responses in workers exposed to lead for up to six years. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2023 Dec;25(12):1086-1095. doi: 10.1111/jch.14748. Epub 2023 Nov 8.

    PubMed 37938055
  • Yu YL, Thijs L, Saenen N, Melgarejo JD, Wei DM, Yang WY, Yu CG, Roels HA, Nawrot TS, Maestre GE, Staessen JA, Zhang ZY. Two-year neurocognitive responses to first occupational lead exposure. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2021 Apr 1;47(3):233-243. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3940. Epub 2020 Dec 4.

    PubMed 33274751
  • Yu YL, Yang WY, Thijs L, Melgarejo JD, Yu CG, Wei DM, Wei FF, Nawrot TS, Zhang ZY, Staessen JA. Two-Year Responses of Office and Ambulatory Blood Pressure to First Occupational Lead Exposure. Hypertension. 2020 Oct;76(4):1299-1307. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.120.15590. Epub 2020 Sep 9.

    PubMed 32903104
  • Yu CG, Wei FF, Yang WY, Zhang ZY, Mujaj B, Thijs L, Feng YM, Staessen JA. Heart rate variability and peripheral nerve conduction velocity in relation to blood lead in newly hired lead workers. Occup Environ Med. 2019 Jun;76(6):382-388. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2018-105379. Epub 2019 Mar 30.

    PubMed 30928907

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Occupational Exposure, run by KU Leuven at 1 site in Belgium.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Mar 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Belgium. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Annual change in systolic blood pressure as measured by 24-h ambulatory monitoring (time frame: Baseline, 1 year and 2 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02243904, which also lists 5 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Mar 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in