AzTrials
AzTrials

Prostatic HyperplasiaNCT02244333

Efficacy, Tolerability and Safety of ALNA® in Patients With Benign Prostatic Syndrome (BPS)

An observational study of Prostatic Hyperplasia, run by Boehringer Ingelheim.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Study to assess efficacy, tolerability and safety parameters of a one month ALNA® - treatment after switch from Terazosin-treatment Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age, men only
Conditions the study is for
Prostatic Hyperplasia
What is being tested?
ALNA®
How many people
4,575 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Feb 2004to Jul 2004
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • Men only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients with symptomatic BPS, who switched for ALNA® after preceding Terazosin therapy recruited at urologists

Who may be able to join

  • Suffering from BPS symptoms
  • Preceding treating with Terazosin for at least one month
  • IPSS sum score >= 8 points prior to treatment start with ALNA® or complaints due to BP reduction by Terazosin
  • Indication for a switch to treatment with ALNA® according to its Summary of Product Characteristics (SPC) for a minimum period of one month

Who cannot join

  • Patients fulfilling one of the general or specific contraindications listed in the ALNA® SPC, particularly patients with known hypersensitivities against tamsulosin hydrochloride or any other ingredients of the product, orthostatic dysregulation or severe liver insufficiency could not be included in the Post Marketing Surveillance (PMS) study

About this study

Official title: ALNA® - AWB in Pre-treated Patients With BPS

Study to assess efficacy, tolerability and safety parameters of a one month ALNA® - treatment after switch from Terazosin-treatment

Being tested
ALNA®
Medical subject headings
Prostatic Hyperplasia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • ALNA®Drug

Study groups in NCT02244333
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Patients with symptomatic BPSNot described
Receives: Drug: ALNA®

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change from baseline in International Prostatic Symptom Score (IPSS) by means on patient questionnaire

    Measured: Baseline, after 1 month

  2. Change of Quality of Life (QoL) Index by means on patient questionnaire

    Measured: Baseline, after 1 month

  3. Global comparative assessment of Terazosin and ALNA® treatment by investigator on a 3 point-scale

    Measured: after 1 month

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. Change from Baseline in maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax)

    Measured: Baseline, after 1 month

  2. Change from Baseline in residual urinary volume

    Measured: Baseline, after 1 month

  3. Change from Baseline in blood pressure

    Measured: Baseline, after 1 month

  4. Change from Baseline in Pulse rate (bpm)

    Measured: Baseline, after 1 month

  5. Change in complications due to low blood pressure

    Patient is asked for complications (weakness, dizziness, nausea)

    Measured: Baseline, after 1 month

  6. Global assessment of efficacy by investigator on 4-point scale

    Measured: after 1 month

  7. Global assessment of tolerability by investigator on 4-point scale

    Measured: after 1 month

  8. Global assessment with BPS- treatment by investigator on a 4-point scale

    Switch from Terazosin therapy to ALNA®

    Measured: Baseline, after 1 month

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted19 Sep 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study startFeb 2004
  3. Primary completionJul 2004

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
4,575 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02244333
Sponsor's protocol ID
527.56
Status last verified
Sep 2014
First submitted
18 Sep 2014
Last updated
19 Sep 2014
Results posted
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Prostatic Hyperplasia, run by Boehringer Ingelheim.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Sep 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change from baseline in International Prostatic Symptom Score (IPSS) by means on patient questionnaire (time frame: Baseline, after 1 month). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Sep 2014.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in