AzTrials
AzTrials

Hip FracturesCHANCENCT02247791

Uncemented Compared to Cemented Femoral Stems in Total Hip Arthroplasty

A study testing Uncemented femoral stem and Cemented femoral stem in people with Hip Fractures, run by Danderyd Hospital at 1 site in Sweden.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether an uncemented hip prosthesis is as safe as an cemented hip prosthesis for patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty surgery following a displaced femoral neck fracture. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 65 to 79 years
Conditions the study is for
Hip Fractures
What is being tested?
Uncemented femoral stem and Cemented femoral stem
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
140 participants
Where
1 siteSweden
Study dates
Sep 2009to Sep 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 65 to 79 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Acute Displaced femoral neck fracture
  • Subject is aged between 65-79 years
  • Independent walker with or without walking aides
  • Subject is able and capable of providing consent to participate in the study

Who cannot join

  • Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis
  • Patients with an impaired cognitive dysfunction
  • Patients with Pathological fractures
  • Patients with substance abuse
  • Patients with fracture older than 36-hours on arrival at the A\&E
  • Patients suffering from cancer
  • Patients determined by principal investigator to be unsuitable for inclusion

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Sweden1 site
  • Danderyd Hospital

    Stockholm, 18288

Other trials in Sweden

About this study

Official title: Study of Prosthesis Choice in Older Patients With a Dislocated Femoral Neck Fracture of the Hip

The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether an uncemented hip prosthesis is as safe as an cemented hip prosthesis for patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty surgery following a displaced femoral neck fracture.

Read the detailed description

The study will randomize patients between an uncemented and cemented stem

Conditions
Hip Fractures
Being tested
Uncemented femoral stem, Cemented femoral stem
Medical subject headings
Hip Fractures

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Uncemented femoral stemProcedure or surgery

    Also called BiMetric uncemented femoral stem

    All patients will be randomized to operation with either an uncemented femoral stem or a cemented femoral stem

  • Cemented femoral stemProcedure or surgery

    Also called CPT cemented femoral stem

    All patients will be randomized to operation with either an uncemented femoral stem or a cemented femoral stem

Study groups in NCT02247791
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Cemented femoral stemActive comparatorPatient undergoing total hip arthroplasty surgery
Receives: Procedure: Cemented femoral stem
Uncemented femoral stemActive comparatorPatients undergoing total hip arthroplasty
Receives: Procedure: Uncemented femoral stem

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Hip related complication rate

    All hip-related complications

    Measured: 2 years

  2. Health-related Quality of Life

    Health related quality of life

    Measured: 2 years

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Duration of surgery

    Measured: 2 years

  2. Intraoperative bleeding

    Measured: 2 years

  3. Hip function

    Measured with Harris hip score

    Measured: 2 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted25 Sep 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study startSep 2009
  3. Primary completionSep 2016 (estimated)
  4. Study completionSep 2024 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
140 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02247791
Sponsor's protocol ID
CHANCE
Acronym
CHANCE
Status last verified
Jan 2016
First submitted
21 Oct 2013
Last updated
28 Jan 2016
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Chammout G, Muren O, Boden H, Salemyr M, Skoldenberg O. Cemented compared to uncemented femoral stems in total hip replacement for displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly: study protocol for a single-blinded, randomized controlled trial (CHANCE-trial). BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 Sep 20;17(1):398. doi: 10.1186/s12891-016-1253-y.

    PubMed 27646142

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Uncemented femoral stem and Cemented femoral stem in people with Hip Fractures, run by Danderyd Hospital at 1 site in Sweden.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Jan 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Sweden. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Hip related complication rate (time frame: 2 years). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02247791, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Jan 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in