Drug; Withdrawal Symptoms, NeonatalPhase 1/2NCT02249026
Sublingual Buprenorphine Treatment for Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome - Pilot Study
A Phase 1/2 study testing BZDs + opiate exposure treated with BPN and Opiates exposure treated with BPN in people with Drug; Withdrawal Symptoms, Neonatal and Withdrawal, run by Gauda, Estelle B., M.D. at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Summary: There have been two published RCTs showing efficacy of buprenorphine treatment for NAS. However these trials excluded an estimated 22-47% of infants requiring pharmacologic treatment; those infants born to mothers with co-dependence on an opiate and a benzodiazepine. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages Up to 7 days
- Conditions the study is for
- Drug; Withdrawal Symptoms, Neonatal, Withdrawal, Fetus and Newborn Affected by Other Maternal Medication
- What is being tested?
- BZDs + opiate exposure treated with BPN and Opiates exposure treated with BPN
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 40 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Oct 2014to Jun 2016
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Up to 7 days
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Newborns ≥ 35 0/7 wks. Gestation undelivered or < 12 hours of age at enrollment and within the 72 hrs. after birth at the time of transfer to ACH for pharmacologic treatment for moderate to severe NAS
- Newborns ≥ 2 kg weight at birth (10th % for a 35 0/7 wk. newborn)
- Informed parental
Who cannot join
- Newborns <35 0/7 wks. gestation OR older than 72 hrs. of life at time of transfer to ACH for pharmacologic treatment for moderate to severe NAS
- Major congenital anomalies
- Major concomitant medical illness including antibiotic treatment for greater than 3 days
- Any illness that precludes oral or sublingual medication use
- Infants who have received any drug other than "study drug" to treat their NAS
- Infants requiring drug therapy with any high or moderate CYP3A4 inhibitor or inducer (Appendix A)
- Breastfeeding infants.
- Infants in significant pain requiring medication for comfort (for example those with a fracture).
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
All Children's Hopsital
St. Petersburg, Florida, 33701
Susan Bell, RN, 727-767-7320, susan.bell@allkids.org
Sandra Brooks, MD
About this study
Summary: There have been two published RCTs showing efficacy of buprenorphine treatment for NAS. However these trials excluded an estimated 22-47% of infants requiring pharmacologic treatment; those infants born to mothers with co-dependence on an opiate and a benzodiazepine. Although there are concerns, we anticipate that buprenorphine will be safe in this population. If it is safe, we can include these infants in the large double blind, double-dummy buprenorphine and clonidine vs. morphine and clonidine trial. If on the other hand, these infants have respiratory depression or other adverse events when buprenorphine is given, it will be important to report this study and caution the use of buprenorphine in these infants
Read the detailed description
The Problem: Infants who are born to mothers taking or abusing opiates frequently suffer from neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) after birth. They often have withdrawal symptoms which can be life threatening if untreated. The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends opioid replacement for the treatment of these symptoms in newborns. Buprenorphine (BNP) has gained widespread use in the treatment of adult opioid dependence. One of the reasons BNP is so appealing is because of its safety profile in comparison to the other drugs in its class (opiates). It has less respiratory depression and a lower level of physical dependence than the other opioids. BNP has recently been trialed, in its sublingual form, as a treatment for newborns with NAS. In two trials by the same group, there was a significant reduction in both the length of treatment and in-patient hospital days in infants treated with BNP in comparison to infants treated with morphine.
In both of these studies, mother/infant pairs were excluded if the mother was dual dependent on opiates and benzodiazepines (BZDs). This is not an insignificant population. BZDs are frequently prescribed during pregnancy to treat anxiety and panic disorder in women who are taking methadone or BNP for opioid replacement therapy. BZDs are also common drugs of abuse. It has been estimated that 22-47% of mothers whose infants are diagnosed with NAS used both BZDs and opiates during the pregnancy. These infants have a protracted NAS with longer hospitalization in comparison to infants exposed to an opioid alone. There are conflicting reports in the literature regarding the safety of concomitant use of BNP and BZDs. In both adults and children the combination of BNP and BZD prolongs respiratory depression in non-drug abusers. In addition, autopsy findings in six adults who were drug abusers were linked to concomitant use of BNP and BZD by analysis at autopsy. On the other hand in adult tapering trials comparing BNP with methadone in dual-dependent adults there were no adverse events in the BNP group, opiate withdrawal scores were lower and the adults were more likely to complete treatment. Thus while treatment of NAS with BNP may be desirable and efficacious in opiate tapering protocols, it is imperative that we look specifically at this group of infants with dual exposure to opioids and BZDs. This is a single site, un-blinded observational safety study. Study participants will be recruited from eligible participants who are born at Bayfront Medical Center Baby Place and subsequently admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) at All Children's' Hospital (ACH) for treatment of NAS. Data from this pilot safety trial will be used to apply for NIH funding to conduct a large randomized double-blind trial to determine the efficacy of BNP versus morphine for the treatment of NAS.
The Research Hypothesis: BNP can be used safely to treat NAS in the subgroup of infants whose mothers were taking both an opiate and a BZD in the week prior to delivery.
The Importance of the Research: BNP is emerging as a "safer" and more efficient drug for adult detoxification and maintenance programs and is showing promise for the treatment of neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS). In the most recent published trial comparing BNP to morphine in infants with NAS, the length of stay (LOS) was decreased by 40% in the BNP group (from an average of 38 days in the morphine group to 23 days in the BNP group). No major adverse effects were reported in either treatment group. As is common in early trials, the experimental group was restricted - specifically maternal BZD use was an exclusion criteria. The rational given was that length of stay is known to be longer for infants whose mothers were also using BZDs. However, this is not an insignificant population. It has been reported that 22-47% of opiate users are co-using BZDs. At ACH, the incidence of infants exposed to both classes of drugs has ranged from 15-35%. Before BNP becomes the standard of care it is important to look closely at this group of infants and either caution the use of BNP or demonstrate its safety. This pilot trial is designed to determine if infants who have dual in-utero exposures to opiates and BZDs can be safely treated with BNP.
- Conditions
- Drug; Withdrawal Symptoms, Neonatal, Withdrawal, Fetus and Newborn Affected by Other Maternal Medication
- Being tested
- BZDs + opiate exposure treated with BPN, Opiates exposure treated with BPN
- Medical subject headings
- Substance Withdrawal Syndrome
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
BZDs + opiate exposure treated with BPNDrug
Also called Suboxone, Subutex, Buprenex
These infants will have been exposed not only to opiates but also to BZDs during pregnancy. Administration of Buprenorphine: The solution will be administered under the tongue followed by the insertion of a pacifier to reduce swallowing. Dose volumes greater than 0.5 mL will be given in 2 aliquots separated by 2 minutes allowing time for the drug to be absorbed. If the infant's withdrawal is not controlled, clonidine will be used as adjunct therapy. The initial dose of clonidine is 6 mcg/kg/day in 4 divided doses given every 6 hours. If signs of withdrawal are not controlled, the dose may be increased by 3mcg/kg/day to a maximum 12 mcg/kg/day divided q 6 hrs.
Opiates exposure treated with BPNDrug
Also called Suboxone, Subutex, Buprenex
These infants will have been exposed not only to opiates during pregnancy. Administration of Buprenorphine: The solution will be administered under the tongue followed by the insertion of a pacifier to reduce swallowing. Dose volumes greater than 0.5 mL will be given in 2 aliquots separated by 2 minutes allowing time for the drug to be absorbed. If the infant's withdrawal is not controlled, clonidine will be used as adjunct therapy. The initial dose of clonidine is 6 mcg/kg/day in 4 divided doses given every 6 hours. If signs of withdrawal are not controlled, the dose may be increased by 3mcg/kg/day to a maximum 12 mcg/kg/day divided q 6 hrs.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| BZDs + opiate exposure treated with BPN | Experimental | In-utero opiate and BZD exposed neonates + Buprenorphine sub-lingual administered in dose volumes greater than 0.5 mL will be given in 2 aliquots separated by 2 minutes allowing time for the drug to be absorbed. Receives: Drug: BZDs + opiate exposure treated with BPN |
| Opiates exposure treated with BPN | Active comparator | In-utero opiate exposed neonates + Buprenorphine sub-lingual administered in dose volumes greater than 0.5 mL will be given in 2 aliquots separated by 2 minutes allowing time for the drug to be absorbed. Receives: Drug: Opiates exposure treated with BPN |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Assessment of vital signs
To determine the in infants with NAS who have in-utero exposure to opiates and BZDs. This is an un-blinded observational safety study. A total of 24 neonates with moderate to severe NAS will be enrolled at ACH and its obstetric affiliate Bayfront Hospital in Florida. 12 of these infants will have a positive screen (described below) for both maternally transferred opiate and BZD. The comparison group of 12 infants will have been exposed to opiates but not to BZDs during the pregnancy. Comparisons will be made both within and between groups. The principle outcome measures will be 1) respiratory function as measured by respiratory rate 2) a combined event score which includes episodes of apnea (>20 sec apneic pause), bradycardia (<80 bpm) and oxygen hemoglobin desaturation measured by pulse oximetry (<90%).
Other safety measures will include: blood pressures.
Measured: 2-8 weeks
Secondary outcomes (1)
To determine BNP levels in blood, urine, and meconium(stool)
Secondary Objectives: To gain additional knowledge about the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of BNP and BZD in these neonates. Infant blood, urine, and meconium(stool) samples will be analyzed by mass spectroscopy.
Measured: 2 - 8 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 Sep 2014 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2014
- Primary completionJun 2016 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Drug; Withdrawal Symptoms, NeonatalStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Gauda, Estelle B., M.D.
- Collaborators
- Johns Hopkins University, Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Estelle B Gauda, MD, Principal investigator, JHMI
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02249026
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 12-0501
- Status last verified
- May 2016
- First submitted
- 11 Aug 2014
- Last updated
- 6 May 2016
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 May 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Sublingual Buprenorphine Treatment for Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome - Pilot Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02249026
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 12-0501
- Conditions
- Drug; Withdrawal Symptoms, Neonatal, Withdrawal, Fetus and Newborn Affected by Other Maternal Medication
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Gauda, Estelle B., M.D.
- Collaborators
- Johns Hopkins University, Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital
- Study start
- Oct 2014
- Primary completion
- Jun 2016 (estimated)
- First posted
- 25 Sep 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Summary: There have been two published RCTs showing efficacy of buprenorphine treatment for NAS. However these trials excluded an estimated 22-47% of infants requiring pharmacologic treatment; those infants born to mothers with co-dependence on an opiate and a benzodiazepine. Although there are concerns, we anticipate that buprenorphine will be safe in this population. If it is safe, we can include these infants in the large double blind, double-dummy buprenorphine and clonidine vs. morphine and clonidine trial. If on the other hand, these infants have respiratory depression or other adverse events when buprenorphine is given, it will be important to report this study and caution the use of buprenorphine in these infants
Detailed description
The Problem: Infants who are born to mothers taking or abusing opiates frequently suffer from neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) after birth. They often have withdrawal symptoms which can be life threatening if untreated. The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends opioid replacement for the treatment of these symptoms in newborns. Buprenorphine (BNP) has gained widespread use in the treatment of adult opioid dependence. One of the reasons BNP is so appealing is because of its safety profile in comparison to the other drugs in its class (opiates). It has less respiratory depression and a lower level of physical dependence than the other opioids. BNP has recently been trialed, in its sublingual form, as a treatment for newborns with NAS. In two trials by the same group, there was a significant reduction in both the length of treatment and in-patient hospital days in infants treated with BNP in comparison to infants treated with morphine.
In both of these studies, mother/infant pairs were excluded if the mother was dual dependent on opiates and benzodiazepines (BZDs). This is not an insignificant population. BZDs are frequently prescribed during pregnancy to treat anxiety and panic disorder in women who are taking methadone or BNP for opioid replacement therapy. BZDs are also common drugs of abuse. It has been estimated that 22-47% of mothers whose infants are diagnosed with NAS used both BZDs and opiates during the pregnancy. These infants have a protracted NAS with longer hospitalization in comparison to infants exposed to an opioid alone. There are conflicting reports in the literature regarding the safety of concomitant use of BNP and BZDs. In both adults and children the combination of BNP and BZD prolongs respiratory depression in non-drug abusers. In addition, autopsy findings in six adults who were drug abusers were linked to concomitant use of BNP and BZD by analysis at autopsy. On the other hand in adult tapering trials comparing BNP with methadone in dual-dependent adults there were no adverse events in the BNP group, opiate withdrawal scores were lower and the adults were more likely to complete treatment. Thus while treatment of NAS with BNP may be desirable and efficacious in opiate tapering protocols, it is imperative that we look specifically at this group of infants with dual exposure to opioids and BZDs. This is a single site, un-blinded observational safety study. Study participants will be recruited from eligible participants who are born at Bayfront Medical Center Baby Place and subsequently admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) at All Children's' Hospital (ACH) for treatment of NAS. Data from this pilot safety trial will be used to apply for NIH funding to conduct a large randomized double-blind trial to determine the efficacy of BNP versus morphine for the treatment of NAS.
The Research Hypothesis: BNP can be used safely to treat NAS in the subgroup of infants whose mothers were taking both an opiate and a BZD in the week prior to delivery.
The Importance of the Research: BNP is emerging as a "safer" and more efficient drug for adult detoxification and maintenance programs and is showing promise for the treatment of neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS). In the most recent published trial comparing BNP to morphine in infants with NAS, the length of stay (LOS) was decreased by 40% in the BNP group (from an average of 38 days in the morphine group to 23 days in the BNP group). No major adverse effects were reported in either treatment group. As is common in early trials, the experimental group was restricted - specifically maternal BZD use was an exclusion criteria. The rational given was that length of stay is known to be longer for infants whose mothers were also using BZDs. However, this is not an insignificant population. It has been reported that 22-47% of opiate users are co-using BZDs. At ACH, the incidence of infants exposed to both classes of drugs has ranged from 15-35%. Before BNP becomes the standard of care it is important to look closely at this group of infants and either caution the use of BNP or demonstrate its safety. This pilot trial is designed to determine if infants who have dual in-utero exposures to opiates and BZDs can be safely treated with BNP.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| BZDs + opiate exposure treated with BPN | Experimental | Drug: BZDs + opiate exposure treated with BPNIn-utero opiate and BZD exposed neonates + Buprenorphine sub-lingual administered in dose volumes greater than 0.5 mL will be given in 2 aliquots separated by 2 minutes allowing time for the drug to be absorbed. |
| Opiates exposure treated with BPN | Active comparator | Drug: Opiates exposure treated with BPNIn-utero opiate exposed neonates + Buprenorphine sub-lingual administered in dose volumes greater than 0.5 mL will be given in 2 aliquots separated by 2 minutes allowing time for the drug to be absorbed. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- Up to 7 days
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Newborns ≥ 35 0/7 wks. Gestation undelivered or < 12 hours of age at enrollment and within the 72 hrs. after birth at the time of transfer to ACH for pharmacologic treatment for moderate to severe NAS
- Newborns ≥ 2 kg weight at birth (10th % for a 35 0/7 wk. newborn)
- Informed parental
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Newborns <35 0/7 wks. gestation OR older than 72 hrs. of life at time of transfer to ACH for pharmacologic treatment for moderate to severe NAS
- Major congenital anomalies
- Major concomitant medical illness including antibiotic treatment for greater than 3 days
- Any illness that precludes oral or sublingual medication use
- Infants who have received any drug other than "study drug" to treat their NAS
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| BZDs + opiate exposure treated with BPNAlso: Suboxone, Subutex, BuprenexThese infants will have been exposed not only to opiates but also to BZDs during pregnancy. Administration of Buprenorphine: The solution will be administered under the tongue followed by the insertion of a pacifier to reduce swallowing. Dose volumes greater than 0.5 mL will be given in 2 aliquots separated by 2 minutes allowing time for the drug to be absorbed. If the infant's withdrawal is not controlled, clonidine will be used as adjunct therapy. The initial dose of clonidine is 6 mcg/kg/day in 4 divided doses given every 6 hours. If signs of withdrawal are not controlled, the dose may be increased by 3mcg/kg/day to a maximum 12 mcg/kg/day divided q 6 hrs. | Drug | BZDs + opiate exposure treated with BPN |
| Opiates exposure treated with BPNAlso: Suboxone, Subutex, BuprenexThese infants will have been exposed not only to opiates during pregnancy. Administration of Buprenorphine: The solution will be administered under the tongue followed by the insertion of a pacifier to reduce swallowing. Dose volumes greater than 0.5 mL will be given in 2 aliquots separated by 2 minutes allowing time for the drug to be absorbed. If the infant's withdrawal is not controlled, clonidine will be used as adjunct therapy. The initial dose of clonidine is 6 mcg/kg/day in 4 divided doses given every 6 hours. If signs of withdrawal are not controlled, the dose may be increased by 3mcg/kg/day to a maximum 12 mcg/kg/day divided q 6 hrs. | Drug | Opiates exposure treated with BPN |
Primary outcome
Assessment of vital signs
Time frame: 2-8 weeks
To determine the in infants with NAS who have in-utero exposure to opiates and BZDs. This is an un-blinded observational safety study. A total of 24 neonates with moderate to severe NAS will be enrolled at ACH and its obstetric affiliate Bayfront Hospital in Florida. 12 of these infants will have a positive screen (described below) for both maternally transferred opiate and BZD. The comparison group of 12 infants will have been exposed to opiates but not to BZDs during the pregnancy. Comparisons will be made both within and between groups. The principle outcome measures will be 1) respiratory function as measured by respiratory rate 2) a combined event score which includes episodes of apnea (>20 sec apneic pause), bradycardia (<80 bpm) and oxygen hemoglobin desaturation measured by pulse oximetry (<90%). Other safety measures will include: blood pressures.
1 secondary outcome
To determine BNP levels in blood, urine, and meconium(stool)
Time frame: 2 - 8 weeks
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 May 2016.
Related trials for Drug; Withdrawal Symptoms, Neonatal
Not yet recruitingPhase 2/3
Dexmedetomidine for Invasive Ventilation In the NEOnate
Invasive Ventilation, Infant Pain
Active, not recruiting
Neurostimulation to Improve NOWS Outcomes
Neonatal Opioid Withdrawal Syndrome, Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Estelle B Gauda, MD principal investigator
JHMI
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1/2 study testing BZDs + opiate exposure treated with BPN and Opiates exposure treated with BPN in people with Drug; Withdrawal Symptoms, Neonatal and Withdrawal, run by Gauda, Estelle B., M.D. at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 May 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Each site lists its own contact: choose the nearest one under Trial locations. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Assessment of vital signs (time frame: 2-8 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 May 2016.