Neonatal AdaptationPhase 3NCT02250079
Polyethylene Body Bags as an Alternative to Radiant Heat Lamp During the Neonatal Adaptation in Infants Older Than 29 Weeks
A Phase 3 study testing polyethylene plastic bag and Conventional treatment in people with Neonatal Adaptation, run by Universidad Nacional de Colombia at 1 site in Colombia.
Trial summary
INTRODUCTION: Hypothermia in the newborn causes morbid conditions. In developing countries in the basic technology for neonatal adaptation may not be available. Polyethylene bags may be an alternative to lamp radiant heat to prevent hypothermia OBJECTIVE: To characterize the differences between babies undergoing body… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 29 to 42 weeksHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Neonatal Adaptation
- What is being tested?
- polyethylene plastic bag and Conventional treatment
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 100 participants
- Where
- 1 siteColombia
- Study dates
- Jun 2013to Dec 2013
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 29 to 42 weeks
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Inborn neonates with both a gestational age >29 weeks
Who cannot join
- Abdominal wall defect, myelomeningocele, major congenital anomaly, or blistering skin disorder
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Features and Differences Between Neonates Undergoing Body Bag With Polyethylene and Conventional Drying During Neonatal Adaptation in Maternal and Child Headquarters Hospital and the Victoria Hospital Engativá, Bogotá, 2013
INTRODUCTION: Hypothermia in the newborn causes morbid conditions. In developing countries in the basic technology for neonatal adaptation may not be available. Polyethylene bags may be an alternative to lamp radiant heat to prevent hypothermia OBJECTIVE: To characterize the differences between babies undergoing body bag with polyethylene or conventional drying during neonatal adaptation in the Hospital de la Victoria and Hospital de Engativá, Bogotá, Colombia, 2013.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: parallel-group randomized controlled trial. Groups: dried conventional (control) or polyethylene body bag (intervention). The procedure lasted 10 minutes, the bag body and / or radiant heat lamp was removed. Environment temperature and humidity, temperature in the body segments 1-5-10-60-120 minutes and APGAR was measured. Statistical Analysis: Descriptive bivariate statistical inference and calculated. Risk ratio (RR) and confidence intervals (CIs) were determined using contingency tables for risk analysis of the outcome. The study was approved by the hospital ethics committee of victory.
- Conditions
- Neonatal Adaptation
- Being tested
- polyethylene plastic bag, Conventional treatment
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
polyethylene plastic bagDevice
Inborn neonates with both a gestational age >29 weeks were randomized 1:1 to either a standard thermoregulation protocol or placement of a Poliethylene body bag since birth to 10 minutes after birth.
Conventional treatmentDevice
Infants randomized to the control group received standard hospital care newborn. This included immediate drying, skin-to-skin contact, early and exclusive breast feeding, postponed bathing, bundling, and radiant warmer. While waiting for criteria cord clamping, the environment humidity and temperature and segment and rectal temperature of the newborn were measure. It was repeated at 1-5- 10-60 and 120 minutes. After clamping, the newborn were positioned in a radiant warmer, and completed the drying process. Umbilical prophylaxis, vitamin K1 application, initial physical examination and ocular prophylaxis are performed. The infants were swaddled in blankets provided by the mother, the head was covered with a hat, and the infants were placed either in an open crib or under a radiant warmer as necessary and available. The same process was done in surgery room in case of cesarean.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Polyethilene body bag group | Experimental | The intervention group infants were provided the same care as control infants, but were dressed with the polyethylene body bag immediately after birth. The bag had an upper opening for the head and a seal at the bottom. The intervention group infants remained in the plastic bag for the first 10 minutes after birth. The same process was done in surgery room in case of cesarean. Umbilical prophylaxis, vitamin K1 application, initial physical examination and ocular prophylaxis are performed. The infants were swaddled in blankets provided by the mother, the head was covered with a hat, and the infants were placed either in an open crib or under a radiant warmer as necessary and available. The same process were done in surgery room in case of cesarean Receives: Device: polyethylene plastic bag |
| Conventional group | Active comparator | ): Infants randomized to the control group received standard hospital care newborn. This included immediate drying, skin-to-skin contact, early and exclusive breast feeding, postponed bathing, bundling, and radiant warmer. While waiting for criteria cord clamping, the environment humidity and temperature and segment and rectal temperature of the newborn were measure. It was repeated at 1-5- 10-60 and 120 minutes. After clamping, the newborn were positioned in a radiant warmer, and completed the drying process. Umbilical prophylaxis, vitamin K1 application, initial physical examination and ocular prophylaxis are performed. The infants were swaddled in blankets provided by the mother, the head was covered with a hat, and the infants were placed either in an open crib or under a radiant warmer as necessary and available. The same process was done in surgery room in case of cesarean. Receives: Device: Conventional treatment |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Temperature
The Student's t test and U of Mann Whitney were used to compare temperature
Measured: 10 minutes
Humidity
The Student's t test and U of Mann Whitney were used to compare relative humidity.
Measured: 10 minutes
Secondary outcomes (1)
Both, Hypothermia or Hyperthermia
Risk ratio (RR) and confidence intervals (CIs) were determined using contingency tables for risk analysis of hypothermia, hyperthermia and APGAR.
Measured: 10 minutes
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 Sep 2014 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2013
- Primary completionDec 2013
- Study completionDec 2013
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Neonatal AdaptationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Universidad Nacional de Colombia
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02250079
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- polyethylene29
- Status last verified
- Sep 2014
- First submitted
- 8 Sep 2014
- Last updated
- 26 Sep 2014
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 26 Sep 2014. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Features and Differences Between Neonates Undergoing Body Bag With Polyethylene and Conventional Drying During Neonatal Adaptation in Maternal and Child Headquarters Hospital and the Victoria Hospital Engativá, Bogotá, 2013
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02250079
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- polyethylene29
- Conditions
- Neonatal Adaptation
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Universidad Nacional de ColombiaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jun 2013
- Primary completion
- Dec 2013 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2013 (actual)
- First posted
- 26 Sep 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
INTRODUCTION: Hypothermia in the newborn causes morbid conditions. In developing countries in the basic technology for neonatal adaptation may not be available. Polyethylene bags may be an alternative to lamp radiant heat to prevent hypothermia OBJECTIVE: To characterize the differences between babies undergoing body bag with polyethylene or conventional drying during neonatal adaptation in the Hospital de la Victoria and Hospital de Engativá, Bogotá, Colombia, 2013.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: parallel-group randomized controlled trial. Groups: dried conventional (control) or polyethylene body bag (intervention). The procedure lasted 10 minutes, the bag body and / or radiant heat lamp was removed. Environment temperature and humidity, temperature in the body segments 1-5-10-60-120 minutes and APGAR was measured. Statistical Analysis: Descriptive bivariate statistical inference and calculated. Risk ratio (RR) and confidence intervals (CIs) were determined using contingency tables for risk analysis of the outcome. The study was approved by the hospital ethics committee of victory.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Polyethilene body bag group | Experimental | Device: polyethylene plastic bagThe intervention group infants were provided the same care as control infants, but were dressed with the polyethylene body bag immediately after birth. The bag had an upper opening for the head and a seal at the bottom. The intervention group infants remained in the plastic bag for the first 10 minutes after birth. The same process was done in surgery room in case of cesarean. Umbilical prophylaxis, vitamin K1 application, initial physical examination and ocular prophylaxis are performed. The infants were swaddled in blankets provided by the mother, the head was covered with a hat, and the infants were placed either in an open crib or under a radiant warmer as necessary and available. The same process were done in surgery room in case of cesarean |
| Conventional group | Active comparator | Device: Conventional treatment): Infants randomized to the control group received standard hospital care newborn. This included immediate drying, skin-to-skin contact, early and exclusive breast feeding, postponed bathing, bundling, and radiant warmer. While waiting for criteria cord clamping, the environment humidity and temperature and segment and rectal temperature of the newborn were measure. It was repeated at 1-5- 10-60 and 120 minutes. After clamping, the newborn were positioned in a radiant warmer, and completed the drying process. Umbilical prophylaxis, vitamin K1 application, initial physical examination and ocular prophylaxis are performed. The infants were swaddled in blankets provided by the mother, the head was covered with a hat, and the infants were placed either in an open crib or under a radiant warmer as necessary and available. The same process was done in surgery room in case of cesarean. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 29 to 42 weeks
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Inborn neonates with both a gestational age >29 weeks
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Abdominal wall defect, myelomeningocele, major congenital anomaly, or blistering skin disorder
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| polyethylene plastic bagInborn neonates with both a gestational age >29 weeks were randomized 1:1 to either a standard thermoregulation protocol or placement of a Poliethylene body bag since birth to 10 minutes after birth. | Device | Polyethilene body bag group |
| Conventional treatmentInfants randomized to the control group received standard hospital care newborn. This included immediate drying, skin-to-skin contact, early and exclusive breast feeding, postponed bathing, bundling, and radiant warmer. While waiting for criteria cord clamping, the environment humidity and temperature and segment and rectal temperature of the newborn were measure. It was repeated at 1-5- 10-60 and 120 minutes. After clamping, the newborn were positioned in a radiant warmer, and completed the drying process. Umbilical prophylaxis, vitamin K1 application, initial physical examination and ocular prophylaxis are performed. The infants were swaddled in blankets provided by the mother, the head was covered with a hat, and the infants were placed either in an open crib or under a radiant warmer as necessary and available. The same process was done in surgery room in case of cesarean. | Device | Conventional group |
Primary outcome
Temperature
Time frame: 10 minutes
The Student's t test and U of Mann Whitney were used to compare temperature
Humidity
Time frame: 10 minutes
The Student's t test and U of Mann Whitney were used to compare relative humidity.
1 secondary outcome
Both, Hypothermia or Hyperthermia
Time frame: 10 minutes
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 26 Sep 2014.
Related trials for Neonatal Adaptation
RecruitingObservational study
Rod and Cone Mediated Function in Retinal Disease
Retinal Degeneration, Retinitis Pigmentosa
Not yet recruiting
30-Second Versus Pulsation-Based Delayed Cord Clamping in Term Newborns
Umbilical Cord Clamping
Recruiting
Home Exercise for Individuals With Neurodegenerative Disease
Neurodegenerative Diseases, Leukodystrophy
RecruitingObservational study
Translation and Cross-Cultural Adaptation Into French of the COMFORTneo Pain Assessment Tool for Newborns
Pain
RecruitingPhase 1/2
NRSTS2021, A Risk Adapted Study Evaluating Maintenance Pazopanib, Limited Margin, Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy and Selinexor in Non-Rhabdomyosarcoma Soft Tissue Sarcoma (NRSTS)
Adipocytic Neoplasm, Liposarcoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing polyethylene plastic bag and Conventional treatment in people with Neonatal Adaptation, run by Universidad Nacional de Colombia at 1 site in Colombia.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Sep 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Colombia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Temperature (time frame: 10 minutes). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Sep 2014.