AzTrials
AzTrials

Head and Neck Squamous Cell CancerPhase 3NCT02252042

Pembrolizumab (MK-3475) Versus Standard Treatment for Recurrent or Metastatic Head and Neck Cancer (MK-3475-040/KEYNOTE-040)

A Phase 3 study testing Pembrolizumab, Methotrexate and Docetaxel in people with Head and Neck Squamous Cell Cancer, run by Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a study of pembrolizumab (MK-3475, KEYTRUDA®) versus standard treatment (methotrexate, docetaxel or cetuximab) for the treatment of recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell cancer (HNSCC). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Head and Neck Squamous Cell Cancer
What is being tested?
Pembrolizumab, Methotrexate and Docetaxel
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
495 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
17 Nov 2014to 15 Aug 2022
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Has histologically- or cytologically-confirmed recurrent disease not amenable to curative treatment with local or systemic therapy, or metastatic (disseminated) head and neck squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx, and larynx that is considered incurable by local therapies
  • Failure of prior platinum therapy
  • Radiographically-measurable disease based on RECIST 1.1
  • Tumor tissue available for PD-L1 biomarker analysis
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1
  • Adequate organ function
  • Female participants of childbearing potential must be willing to use 2 methods of birth control or abstain from heterosexual activity for the course of the study through 120 days after last dose of pembrolizumab or through 120-180 days after the last dose of docetaxel, methotrexate or cetuximab, acccording to local standard of care
  • Male participants must agree to use an adequate method of contraception starting with the first dose of study therapy through 120 days after last dose of pembrolizumab or through 120-180 days after the last dose of docetaxel, methotrexate or cetuximab, acccording to local standard of care

Who cannot join

  • Disease is suitable for local therapy administered with curative intent
  • Currently participating in or has participated in a study of an investigational agent or using an investigational device within 4 weeks prior to randomization
  • Previously treated with 3 or more systemic regimens given for recurrent and/or metastatic disease
  • Diagnosis of immunodeficiency or receiving systemic steroid therapy or any other form of immunosuppressive therapy within 7 days prior to the first dose of study therapy
  • Not recovered from adverse events due to therapy more than 4 weeks earlier
  • Prior anti-cancer monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapy within 4 weeks prior to study Day 1, or not recovered from adverse events due to agents administered more than 4 weeks earlier
Show all 17Show fewer
  • Prior chemotherapy, targeted small molecule therapy, or radiation therapy within 2 weeks prior to study Day 1
  • Diagnosed and/or treated additional malignancy within 5 years of randomization, with the exception of curatively-treated basal cell or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, and/or curatively-resected in situ cervical and/or breast cancers
  • Active autoimmune disease that has required systemic therapy in the past 2 years with modifying agents, corticosteroids, or immunosuppressive agents
  • Active central nervous system (CNS) metastases and/or carcinomatous meningitis
  • Active, non-infectious pneumonitis
  • Active infection requiring systemic therapy
  • Pregnant, breastfeeding, or expecting to conceive or father children within the projected duration of the trial, starting with the screening visit through 120 days after the last dose of trial therapy according to local standard of care
  • Prior therapy with an anti-PD-1 or anti-PD1-L1 or -L2 therapy or previously participated in a Merck pembrolizumab (MK-3475) trial
  • Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)
  • Hepatitis B or C
  • Live vaccine within 30 days of planned start of study therapy

About this study

Official title: A Phase III Randomized Trial of MK-3475 (Pembrolizumab) Versus Standard Treatment in Subjects With Recurrent or Metastatic Head and Neck Cancer

This is a study of pembrolizumab (MK-3475, KEYTRUDA®) versus standard treatment (methotrexate, docetaxel or cetuximab) for the treatment of recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell cancer (HNSCC). Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either pembrolizumab or Investigator's choice of standard treatment. The primary study hypothesis is that pembrolizumab treatment prolongs Overall Survival (OS) when compared to standard treatment.

Keywords
Squamous cell carcinoma, Head and neck carcinoma, Programmed Cell Death-1 (PD1, PD-1),, Programmed Death-Ligand 1 (PDL1, PD-L1), Programmed Cell Death Receptor Ligand 2 (PDL2, PD-L2)
Medical subject headings
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell, Parkinson Disease 4, Autosomal Dominant Lewy Body

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • PembrolizumabBiological

    Also called MK-3475, KEYTRUDA®

    200 mg intravenous (IV) on Day 1 of each 3-week cycle.

  • MethotrexateDrug

    40 mg/m^2 IV (may be escalated to 60 mg/m^2 maximum dose) on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 3-week cycle

  • DocetaxelDrug

    75 mg/m^2 IV on Day 1 of each 3- week cycle

  • CetuximabBiological

    400 mg/m^2 IV loading dose on Day 1 and 250 mg/m^2 IV on Days 8 and 15 of Cycle 1, followed by 250 mg/m^2 on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each subsequent 3-week cycle.

Study groups in NCT02252042
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
PembroliziumabExperimentalParticipants will receive pembrolizumab 200 mg intravenous (IV) on Day 1 of each 3-week cycle for up to approximately 24 months. Eligible participants who stop pembrolizumab with Stable Disease (SD) or better but progress after discontinuation may be able to initiate a second course of pembrolizumab for up to approximately 1 additional year at the investigator's discretion.
Receives: Biological: Pembrolizumab
Standard TreatmentActive comparatorParticipants will receive standard treatment of either methotrexate 40 mg/m^2 IV (may be escalated to 60 mg/m^2 maximum dose) on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 3-week cycle; or docetaxel 75 mg/m^2 IV on Day 1 of each 3- week cycle; or cetuximab 400 mg/m^2 IV loading dose on Day 1 and 250 mg/m^2 IV on Days 8 and 15 of Cycle 1, followed by cetuximab 250 mg/m^2 on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each subsequent 3-week cycle.
Receives: Drug: Methotrexate; Drug: Docetaxel; Biological: Cetuximab

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Initial Overall Survival (OS) for All Participants

    OS was defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause. Participants without documented death at the time of the final analysis were to be censored at the date of the last follow-up. The OS for all participants is presented. These initial OS results are based on a data cutoff date of 15-May-2017 with a database lock date of 04-Jun-2017. At the time of the database lock of 04-Jun-2017, there was incomplete collection of survival data for 12 participants.

    Measured: Up to approximately 2 years

  2. Updated Final OS for All Participants

    OS was defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause. Participants without documented death at the time of the final analysis were to be censored at the date of the last follow-up. The updated OS for all participants is presented. These OS results were reported after complete acquisition of all outstanding survival data using a 15-May-2017 data cut-off date with a database update date of 13-Oct-2017.

    Measured: Up to approximately 2 years

Secondary outcomes (15)
  1. OS for Participants With Programmed Cell Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1)-Positive Expression Defined by ≥1% Combined Positive Score (CPS)(PD-L1 ≥1% CPS)

    OS was defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause. Participants without documented death at the time of the final analysis were censored at the date of the last follow-up. The OS for all participants with PD-L1 expression ≥1% CPS was presented. These efficacy results were reported after complete acquisition of all outstanding survival data using a 15-May-2017 data cut-off date with a database update date of 13-Oct-2017.

    Measured: Up to approximately 2 years

  2. Progression-free Survival (PFS) Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 for All Participants

    PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first documented disease progression per RECIST 1.1 based on blinded central imaging vendor review or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Per RECIST 1.1, progressive disease was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also have demonstrated an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. Note: The appearance of one or more new lesions was also considered progression. The PFS per RECIST 1.1 for all participants is presented. These efficacy results were reported after complete acquisition of all outstanding survival data using a 15-May-2017 data cut-off date with a database update date of 13-Oct-2017.

    Measured: Up to approximately 2 years

  3. PFS Per RECIST 1.1 in Participants With PD-L1 ≥1% CPS

    PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first documented disease progression per RECIST 1.1 based on blinded central imaging vendor review or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Per RECIST 1.1, progressive disease was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also have demonstrated an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. Note: The appearance of one or more new lesions was also considered progression. The PFS per RECIST 1.1 for all participants with PD-L1 expression ≥1% CPS is presented. These efficacy results were reported after complete acquisition of all outstanding survival data using a 15-May-2017 data cut-off date with a database update date of 13-Oct-2017.

    Measured: Up to approximately 2 years

  4. Objective Response Rate (ORR) Per RECIST 1.1 in All Participants

    ORR was defined as the percentage of the participants in the analysis population who had a Complete Response (CR: Disappearance of all target lesions) or a Partial Response (PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions) per RECIST 1.1 based on blinded central imaging vendor review with or without confirmation. The ORR per RECIST 1.1 for all participants is presented. These efficacy results were reported after complete acquisition of all outstanding survival data using a 15-May-2017 data cut-off date with a database update date of 13-Oct-2017.

    Measured: Up to approximately 2 years

  5. ORR Per RECIST 1.1 in Participants With PD-L1 ≥1% CPS

    ORR was defined as the percentage of the participants in the analysis population who had a Complete Response (CR: Disappearance of all target lesions) or a Partial Response (PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions per RECIST 1.1 based on blinded central imaging vendor review with or without confirmation. The ORR per RECIST 1.1 for all participants with PD-L1 expression ≥1% CPS is presented. These efficacy results were reported after complete acquisition of all outstanding survival data using a 15-May-2017 data cut-off date with a database update date of 13-Oct-2017.

    Measured: Up to approximately 2 years

  6. Duration of Response (DOR) Per RECIST 1.1 in All Participants

    For participants who demonstrated a confirmed CR or PR per RECIST 1.1, DOR was defined as the time from first documented evidence of a confirmed CR or PR per RECIST 1.1 until disease progression per RECIST 1.1 or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Per RECIST 1.1, progressive disease was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also have demonstrated an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. Note: The appearance of one or more new lesions was also considered progression. DOR assessments were based on blinded central imaging vendor review with confirmation. The DOR per RECIST 1.1 for all participants who experienced a confirmed CR or PR is presented. These efficacy results were reported after complete acquisition of all outstanding survival data using a 15-May-2017 data cut-off date with a database update date of 13-Oct-2017.

    Measured: Up to approximately 2 years

  7. DOR Per RECIST 1.1 in Participants With PD-L1 ≥1% CPS

    For participants who demonstrated a confirmed CR or PR per RECIST 1.1, DOR was defined as the time from first documented evidence of a confirmed CR or PR per RECIST 1.1 until disease progression per RECIST 1.1 or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Per RECIST 1.1, progressive disease was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also have demonstrated an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. Note: The appearance of one or more new lesions was also considered progression. DOR assessments were based on blinded central imaging vendor review with confirmation. The DOR per RECIST 1.1 for all participants with PD-L1 ≥1% CPS who experienced a confirmed CR or PR is presented. These efficacy results were reported after complete acquisition of all outstanding survival data using a 15-May-2017 data cut-off date with a database update date of 13-Oct-2017.

    Measured: Up to approximately 2 years

  8. Time to Progression (TTP) Per RECIST 1.1 in All Participants

    TTP was defined as the time from randomization to the first documented disease progression based on assessments by the blinded central imaging vendor review per RECIST 1.1. Per RECIST 1.1, progressive disease was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also have demonstrated an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. Note: The appearance of one or more new lesions was also considered progression. The TTP per RECIST 1.1 for all participants is presented. These efficacy results were reported after complete acquisition of all outstanding survival data using a 15-May-2017 data cut-off date with a database update date of 13-Oct-2017.

    Measured: Up to approximately 2 years

  9. TTP Per RECIST 1.1 in Participants With PD-L1 ≥1% CPS

    TTP was defined as the time from randomization to the first documented disease progression based on assessments by the blinded central imaging vendor review per RECIST 1.1. Per RECIST 1.1, progressive disease was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also have demonstrated an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. Note: The appearance of one or more new lesions was also considered progression. The TTP per RECIST 1.1 for all participants with PD-L1 ≥1% CPS is presented. These efficacy results were reported after complete acquisition of all outstanding survival data using a 15-May-2017 data cut-off date with a database update date of 13-Oct-2017.

    Measured: Up to approximately 2 years

  10. PFS Per Modified RECIST in All Participants

    PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first documented progressive disease (PD) per RECIST 1.1 based on blinded central imaging vendor review or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Per RECIST 1.1, PD was defined as ≥20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also have demonstrated an absolute increase of ≥5 mm. Note: The appearance of one or more new lesions was also considered PD. Modified RECIST is similar to RECIST 1.1 with the exception that a confirmation assessment of PD (>4 weeks after the initial PD) is required for participants who remain on treatment following a documented PD per RECIST 1.1. The PFS per modified RECIST for all participants is presented. These efficacy results were reported after complete acquisition of all outstanding survival data using a 15-May-2017 data cut-off date with a database update date of 13-Oct-2017.

    Measured: Up to approximately 2 years

  11. PFS Per Modified RECIST 1.1 in Participants With PD-L1 ≥1% CPS

    PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first documented progressive disease (PD) per RECIST 1.1 based on blinded central imaging vendor review or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Per RECIST 1.1, PD was defined as ≥20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also have demonstrated an absolute increase of ≥5 mm. Note: The appearance of one or more new lesions was also considered PD. Modified RECIST is similar to RECIST 1.1 with the exception that a confirmation assessment of PD (>4 weeks after the initial PD) is required for participants who remain on treatment following a documented PD per RECIST 1.1. The PFS per modified RECIST for all participants with PD-L1 ≥1% CPS is presented. These efficacy results were reported after complete acquisition of all outstanding survival data using a 15-May-2017 data cut-off date with a database update date of 13-Oct-2017.

    Measured: Up to approximately 2 years

  12. Number of Participants Who Experienced At Least One Adverse Event (AE) in All Participants

    An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a study treatment and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure, whether or not considered related to the study treatment or protocol-specified procedure. Any worsening (i.e., any clinically significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a pre-existing condition that is temporally associated with the use of study treatment, is also an AE. The number of all participants who experienced at least one AE is presented.

    Measured: Up to approximately 33 months

  13. Number of Participants Who Experienced At Least One AE in Participants With PD-L1 ≥1% CPS

    An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a study treatment and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure, whether or not considered related to the study treatment or protocol-specified procedure. Any worsening (i.e., any clinically significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a pre-existing condition that is temporally associated with the use of study treatment, is also an AE. The number of all participants with PD-L1 ≥1% CPS who experienced at least one AE is presented.

    Measured: Up to approximately 33 months

  14. Number of Participants Who Discontinued Study Treatment Due to an AE in All Participants

    An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a study treatment and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure, whether or not considered related to the study treatment or protocol-specified procedure. Any worsening (i.e., any clinically significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a pre-existing condition that is temporally associated with the use of study treatment, is also an AE. The number of all participants who discontinued study treatment due to an AE is presented.

    Measured: Up to approximately 30 months

  15. Number of Participants Who Discontinued Study Treatment Due to an AE in Participants With PD-L1 ≥1% CPS

    An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a study treatment and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure, whether or not considered related to the study treatment or protocol-specified procedure. Any worsening (i.e., any clinically significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a pre-existing condition that is temporally associated with the use of study treatment, is also an AE. The number of all participants with PD-L1 ≥1% CPS who discontinued study treatment due to an AE is presented.

    Measured: Up to approximately 30 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted29 Sep 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study start17 Nov 2014
  3. Primary completion15 May 2017
  4. Study completion15 Aug 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
495 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02252042
Sponsor's protocol ID
3475-040
Other IDs
MK-3475-040, 2014-001749-26, 2014
Status last verified
Jun 2023
First submitted
25 Sep 2014
Last updated
17 Jul 2023
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: http://engagezone.msd.com/doc/ProcedureAccessClinicalTrialData.pdf

Publications

  • Xin W, Ding H, Fang Q, Zheng X, Tong Y, Xu G, Yang G. Cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab for treatment of platinum-resistant recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in China: an economic analysis based on a randomised, open-label, phase III trial. BMJ Open. 2020 Dec 18;10(12):e038867. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038867.

    PubMed 33371020
  • Emancipator K, Huang L, Aurora-Garg D, Bal T, Cohen EEW, Harrington K, Soulieres D, Le Tourneau C, Licitra L, Burtness B, Swaby R. Comparing programmed death ligand 1 scores for predicting pembrolizumab efficacy in head and neck cancer. Mod Pathol. 2021 Mar;34(3):532-541. doi: 10.1038/s41379-020-00710-9. Epub 2020 Nov 25.

    PubMed 33239737
  • Pai SI, Faivre S, Licitra L, Machiels JP, Vermorken JB, Bruzzi P, Gruenwald V, Giglio RE, Leemans CR, Seiwert TY, Soulieres D. Comparative analysis of the phase III clinical trials of anti-PD1 monotherapy in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients (CheckMate 141 and KEYNOTE 040). J Immunother Cancer. 2019 Apr 3;7(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s40425-019-0578-0.

    PubMed 30944020
  • Cohen EEW, Soulieres D, Le Tourneau C, Dinis J, Licitra L, Ahn MJ, Soria A, Machiels JP, Mach N, Mehra R, Burtness B, Zhang P, Cheng J, Swaby RF, Harrington KJ; KEYNOTE-040 investigators. Pembrolizumab versus methotrexate, docetaxel, or cetuximab for recurrent or metastatic head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma (KEYNOTE-040): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study. Lancet. 2019 Jan 12;393(10167):156-167. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31999-8. Epub 2018 Nov 30.

    PubMed 30509740
  • Guo T, Califano JA. Molecular biology and immunology of head and neck cancer. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2015 Jul;24(3):397-407. doi: 10.1016/j.soc.2015.03.002. Epub 2015 Apr 20.

    PubMed 25979390

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Pembrolizumab, Methotrexate and Docetaxel in people with Head and Neck Squamous Cell Cancer, run by Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 17 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Jul 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 13 Aug 2018). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Initial Overall Survival (OS) for All Participants (time frame: Up to approximately 2 years). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02252042, which also lists 5 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Jul 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in