AzTrials
AzTrials

GonorrhoeaPhase 2NCT02257918

Randomized, Open-label Phase 2 Study of Oral AZD0914 in the Treatment of Gonorrhea

A Phase 2 study testing AZD0914 and Ceftriaxone in people with Gonorrhoea, run by National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) at 5 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a multi-center Phase 2 randomized, open-label study in approximately 180 adult male and female subjects, between the ages of 18 and 55, who are in good health and meet all eligibility criteria. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 55 years
Conditions the study is for
Gonorrhoea
What is being tested?
AZD0914 and Ceftriaxone
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
180 participants
Where
5 sitesUnited States
Study dates
25 Nov 2014to 30 Dec 2015
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 55 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • 1. Untreated subjects with signs and symptoms of urethral or cervical gonorrhea, or confirmed urethral or cervical gonorrhea or any type of sexual contact in the past 14 days with an infected individual. As defined by positive culture, NAAT test, or Gram-stain 2. Subject is able to give voluntary written informed consent before any study related procedure is performed 3. Willingness to comply with all protocol requirements 4. Male or non-pregnant female 18 to 55 years of age, inclusive 5. If the subject is female, a negative urine pregnancy test at Visit 1 prior to receiving study drug 6. Subject willing to abstain from anal, oral, and vaginal sexual intercourse or use condoms for 7 days following study drug dosing to prevent potential gonococcal reinfection 7. Male subjects must be surgically sterilized or use condoms for 7 days following study drug dosing 8. Female subject must be of non-childbearing potential or if of childbearing potential, she must be using a highly effective method of birth control Non-childbearing potential is defined as being post-menopausal for at least two years, status after bilateral oophorectomy or status after hysterectomy. Female subjects must avoid becoming pregnant by using one of the following acceptable methods of birth control for 30 days prior to study drug dosing: --Intrauterine contraceptive device; OR --Oral contraceptives; OR --Implanon®,Nexplanon®, DepoProvera®, contraceptive skin patch or NuvaRing®, OR --Tubal ligation OR --Abstinence AND --for 30 days following dosing, any method above should be used plus the required use of a barrier method (condom) by the male partner (even if vasectomized)

Who cannot join

  • 1. Confirmed or suspected, complicated or systemic gonorrhea such as pelvic inflammatory disease, testicular pain, epididymitis, arthritis, conjunctivitis or endocarditis or clinical proctitis. 2. Known concomitant infection which would require immediate additional systemic antibiotics 3. Female subject currently breastfeeding 4. Use of any systemic or intravaginal antibiotics with activity against N. gonorrhoeae or systemic antivirals within 30 days prior to study drug administration (topical and intravaginal antifugals are permitted). 5. Use of systemic corticosteroid drugs or other immunosuppressive therapy within 30 days prior to enrollment 6. Cytotoxic chemotherapy or radiation therapy within the previous 3 months 7. Known chronic renal, hepatic (including chronic hepatitis B or hepatitis C infection) or hematologic impairment, or other condition that could interfere with the absorption or metabolism of study drug 8. Any concomitant condition that, in the opinion of the Investigator, would preclude an evaluation of a response or make it unlikely that the course of therapy and follow-up could be completed 9. Subject HIV-infected and taking antiretroviral medication -- Subject not HIV-infected and taking antiretroviral for pre- or post- exposure prophylaxis -- Subject newly diagnosed with HIV infection or known to be HIV infected with evidence of immunosuppression, such as documented or patient reported CD4 count of < 200 10. Known allergy to cephalosporin or penicillin antibiotics 11. Receipt or planned receipt of an investigational product in a clinical trial within 30 days prior to or 7 days after study dose administration 12. Female subject is not willing to defer treatment for bacterial vaginosis until Visit 2 if she tests positive for bacterial vaginosis at Visit 1. 13. Use of drugs that act as inducer/inhibitors of CYP3A4/5 or the P-gp efflux transporter within 30 days prior to study drug administration such as itraconozale, fluconazole, ketoconazole, verapamil, diltiazem, amiodarone, felodipine, carbamazepine, phenytoin, or St. John's wort 14. Subjects known to be co-infected with chlamydia prior to study entry 15. Subjects with medically documented cardiac arrhythmia 16. Known allergy to lidocaine (or local anesthetics of the amide type, e.g., articaine, bupivacaine, mepivacaine, prilocaine, ropivacaine) or the antimicrobial preservative methylparaben.

Trial locations and contacts

5 sites in 1 country.

5 sites in 1 country

United States5 sites
  • Jefferson County Department of Health - STD Clinic

    Birmingham, Alabama, 35233-1502

  • Durham County Health Department

    Durham, North Carolina, 27701-3720

  • Indiana University - Bell Flower Clinic

    Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202-5112

  • CrescentCare Health and Wellness Center

    New Orleans, Louisiana, 70119

  • Public Health STD Clinic

    Seattle, Washington, 98104

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A Randomized, Open-label Phase 2 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of a Single Dose of Oral AZD0914 Compared to Intramuscular Ceftriaxone in the Treatment of Male and Female Subjects With Uncomplicated Gonorrhea

This is a multi-center Phase 2 randomized, open-label study in approximately 180 adult male and female subjects, between the ages of 18 and 55, who are in good health and meet all eligibility criteria. The study is designed to assess the safety and efficacy of an antimicrobial investigational product, AZD0914 manufactured by AstraZeneca, administered to adults to treat uncomplicated urogenital gonorrhea compared to treatment with ceftriaxone. Subjects will be randomly assigned 70:70:40 to receive a single, oral dose of 2000 mg of AZD0914, 3000 mg of AZD0914, or intramuscular dose of 500 mg of ceftriaxone. The drug name is also known as ETX0914.

Read the detailed description

Uncomplicated gonorrhea is currently the second most common bacterial sexually transmitted infection (STI) worldwide and, accordingly, is a serious public health problem. This is a multi-center Phase 2 randomized, open-label study in approximately 180 adult male and female subjects, between the ages of 18 and 55, with uncomplicated cervical or urethral gonorrhea. The study is designed to assess the safety and efficacy of an antimicrobial investigational product, AZD0914 manufactured by AstraZeneca, administered to adults to treat uncomplicated urogenital gonorrhea compared to treatment with intramuscular ceftriaxone. Subjects will be randomly assigned 70:70:40 to receive a single, oral dose of 2000 mg of AZD0914, 3000 mg of AZD0914, or intramuscular dose of 500 mg of ceftriaxone. The study duration is 11 months and subject participation of 30 days. Subjects with 1) untreated urethral or cervical gonorrhea identified via laboratory testing at a prior visit, or 2) untreated subjects acknowledging anal, oral, or vaginal sexual contact in the past 14 days with someone diagnosed with gonorrhea, or 3) signs and symptoms of urethral or cervical gonorrhea will be offered enrollment in the study and consented. The primary objective assess the efficacy by microbiological cure rate of 2000 mg or 3000 mg AZD0914 compared to 500 mg ceftriaxone for the treatment of uncomplicated urogenital gonorrhea. The second primary objective assess the safety and tolerability of a single oral dose of 200 mg or 3000 mg AZD0914 compared to 500 mg ceftriaxone in adult subjects with uncomplicated urogenital gonorrhea. The drug name is also known as ETX0914.

Conditions
Gonorrhoea
Being tested
AZD0914, Ceftriaxone
Keywords
antibiotic, antimicrobial, AZD0914, Ceftriaxone, drug-resistant, sexually transmitted infection, urogenital gonorrhoea
Medical subject headings
Gonorrhea, Sexually Transmitted Diseases

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • AZD0914Drug

    AZD0914 is an antimicrobial amorphous nonsterile powder. Group 1 receive 2000 mg; Group 2 receive 3000 mg. The drug name is also known as ETX0914.

  • CeftriaxoneDrug

    Ceftriaxone is a broad-spectrum cephalosporin antibiotic with a very long half-life and high penetrability to meninges, eyes and inner ears. A white to yellowish orange crystalline powder. Group 3 receives 500 mg reconstituted with 1 ml Lidocaine HCL 1%, intramuscularly.

Study groups in NCT02257918
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Group 1ExperimentalN = 70 subjects receive single oral dose , 2000 mg of AZD0914
Receives: Drug: AZD0914
Group 2ExperimentalN =70 subjects receive single oral dose , 3000 mg of AZD0914
Receives: Drug: AZD0914
Group 3Active comparatorN = 40 subjects receive single intramuscular dose, 500 mg of ceftriaxone
Receives: Drug: Ceftriaxone

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of Participants With Microbiological Cure at Urethral or Cervical Sites in Each Study Arm

    Microbiological cure was assessed at the Test of Cure visit (TOC). Microbiological Cure was derived from the Neisseria gonorrhoeae culture result and assessed by anatomical site. Male participants were swabbed at the urethral site and female participants at the cervical site. Remel RapID NH tests were performed on pure cultures obtained from swab specimens. A participant was defined as a microbiological cure if N. gonorrhoeae was not detectable by culture at TOC.

    Measured: Day 6

  2. Number of Participants Reporting Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) Considered Product-related.

    Adverse events are defined as any untoward medical occurrence regardless of its causal relationship to the study treatment. Serious adverse events included any untoward medical occurrence that resulted in death; was life threatening; was a persistent/significant disability/incapacity; required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation thereof was a congenital anomaly/birth defect; or may have jeopardized the subject or required intervention to prevent one of the outcomes. Relationship to study product was determined by the investigator and defined as a reasonable possibility that the study product caused the adverse event. Reasonable possibility means that there is evidence to suggest a causal relationship between the study product and the adverse event.

    Measured: Day 1 through Day 31

Secondary outcomes (13)
  1. Number of Participants With Microbiological Cure at Rectal Sites in Each Study Arm

    Microbiological cure was assessed at the TOC visit. Microbiological cure was derived from the Neisseria gonorrhoeae culture result and assessed by anatomical site. All participants were swabbed at the rectal site. Remel RapID NH tests were performed on pure cultures obtained from swab specimens. A subject was defined as a microbiological cure if N. gonorrhoeae was not detectable by culture at TOC.

    Measured: Day 6

  2. Number of Participants With Microbiological Cure at Pharyngeal Sites in Each Study Arm

    Microbiological cure was assessed at the Test of Cure visit (TOC). Microbiological Cure was derived from the Neisseria gonorrhoeae culture result and assessed by anatomical site. All subjects were swabbed at the pharyngeal site. Remel RapID NH tests were performed on pure cultures obtained from swab specimens. A participant was defined as a microbiological cure if N. gonorrhoeae was not detectable by culture at TOC.

    Measured: Day 6

  3. Number of Participants With Clinical Cure in Each Study Arm

    A clinical cure was defined as the resolution of all signs and symptoms of gonorrhea (e.g. cervical/vaginal/urethral discharge, dysuria, dyspareunia, vulvovaginal irritation, sore throat) that were present at enrollment with the exception of vaginal discharge due to yeast vaginitis or bacterial vaginosis. A clinical failure was defined by the presence of any sign or symptom of gonorrhea that was also present at enrollment with the exception of vaginal discharge due to yeast vaginitis or bacterial vaginosis. The investigator also submitted his/her determination of whether the participant met or did not meet the criteria for clinical cure (or whether it is unknown if the participant met the criteria). In the event the investigator's assessment of clinical cure did not coincide with the definitions of clinical cure/failure, the investigator's assessment was the final adjudicator.

    Measured: Day 6

  4. Number of Participants With no Detectable N. Gonorrhoeae Nucleic Acid in Urethral/Cervical Specimens in Each Study Arm at Baseline.

    Gonorrhea and Chlamydia nucleic acid amplification tests (GC/CT NAAT) were performed at baseline with specimens collected at the cervical/urethral site. Detectable nucleic acid was derived from GC/CT NAAT testing. If N. gonorrhoeae nucleic acid was detected, the result of the test was classified as positive. If no nucleic acid was detected, the result of the test was classified as negative. If a clear result could not be determined for any reason, the result of the test was classified as indeterminate.

    Measured: Day 1 (Baseline)

  5. Number of Participants With no Detectable N. Gonorrhoeae Nucleic Acid in Urethral/Cervical Specimens in Each Study Arm at Day 6.

    Gonorrhea and Chlamydia nucleic acid amplification tests (GC/CT NAAT) were performed at Day 6 with specimens collected at the cervical/urethral site. Detectable nucleic acid was derived from GC/CT NAAT testing. If N. gonorrhoeae nucleic acid was detected, the result of the test was classified as positive. If no nucleic acid was detected, the result of the test was classified as negative. If a clear result could not be determined for any reason, the result of the test was classified as indeterminate.

    Measured: Day 6

  6. Number of Participants With no Detectable N. Gonorrhoeae Nucleic Acid in Rectal Specimens in Each Study Arm

    Gonorrhea and Chlamydia nucleic acid amplification tests (GC/CT NAAT) were performed at baseline and Day 6 with specimens collected at the rectal site. Detectable nucleic acid was derived from GC/CT NAAT testing. If N. gonorrhoeae nucleic acid was detected, the result of the test was classified as positive. If no nucleic acid was detected, the result of the test was classified as negative. If a clear result could not be determined for any reason, the result of the test was classified as indeterminate.

    Measured: Baseline and Day 6

  7. Number of Participants With no Detectable N. Gonorrhoeae Nucleic Acid in Pharyngeal Specimens in Each Study Arm

    Gonorrhea and Chlamydia nucleic acid amplification tests (GC/CT NAAT) were performed at baseline and Day 6 with specimens collected at the pharyngeal site. Detectable nucleic acid was derived from GC/CT NAAT testing. If N. gonorrhoeae nucleic acid was detected, the result of the test was classified as positive. If no nucleic acid was detected, the result of the test was classified as negative. If a clear result could not be determined for any reason, the result of the test was classified as indeterminate.

    Measured: Baseline and Day 6

  8. Median in Vitro Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations (MIC) Against AZD0914/ETX0914 and Ceftriaxone of Gonococcal Isolates From Culture of Isolates From the Urethral/Cervical Sites at Baseline

    For all positive cultures of specimens collected from the urethra or cervix, isolates were collected and tested for antimicrobial susceptibility profiles and the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was determined. MIC was defined as the lowest concentration of an antimicrobial that inhibited the visible growth of a microorganism after overnight incubation. The MIC breakpoint was a chosen concentration of an antibiotic which defines whether a bacterial isolate is susceptible or resistant to the antibiotic. If the MIC was less than or equal to the susceptibility breakpoint, the bacteria was considered susceptible to the antibiotic. If the MIC was greater than this value, the bacteria was considered intermediate or resistant to the antibiotic.

    Measured: Day 1 (Baseline)

  9. Median in Vitro MIC Against AZD0914/ETX0914 and Ceftriaxone of Gonococcal Isolates From Culture of Isolates From the Urethral/Cervical Sites at Day 6

    For all positive cultures of specimens collected from the urethra or cervix, isolates were collected and tested for antimicrobial susceptibility profiles and the MIC was determined. MIC was defined as the lowest concentration of an antimicrobial that inhibited the visible growth of a microorganism after overnight incubation. The MIC breakpoint was a chosen concentration of an antibiotic which defines whether a bacterial isolate is susceptible or resistant to the antibiotic. If the MIC was less than or equal to the susceptibility breakpoint, the bacteria was considered susceptible to the antibiotic. If the MIC was greater than this value, the bacteria was considered intermediate or resistant to the antibiotic.

    Measured: Day 6

  10. Median in Vitro MIC Against AZD0914/ETX0914 and Ceftriaxone of Gonococcal Isolates From Culture of Isolates From the Rectal Site at Baseline

    For all positive cultures of specimens collected from the rectum, isolates were collected and tested for antimicrobial susceptibility profiles and the MIC was determined. MIC was defined as the lowest concentration of an antimicrobial that inhibited the visible growth of a microorganism after overnight incubation. The MIC breakpoint was a chosen concentration of an antibiotic which defines whether a bacterial isolate is susceptible or resistant to the antibiotic. If the MIC was less than or equal to the susceptibility breakpoint, the bacteria was considered susceptible to the antibiotic. If the MIC was greater than this value, the bacteria was considered intermediate or resistant to the antibiotic.

    Measured: Day 1 (Baseline)

  11. Median in Vitro MIC Against AZD0914/ETX0914 and Ceftriaxone of Gonococcal Isolates From Culture of Isolates From the Rectal Site at Day 6

    For all positive cultures of specimens collected from the rectum, isolates were collected and tested for antimicrobial susceptibility profiles and the MIC was determined. MIC was defined as the lowest concentration of an antimicrobial that inhibited the visible growth of a microorganism after overnight incubation. The MIC breakpoint was a chosen concentration of an antibiotic which defines whether a bacterial isolate is susceptible or resistant to the antibiotic. If the MIC was less than or equal to the susceptibility breakpoint, the bacteria was considered susceptible to the antibiotic. If the MIC was greater than this value, the bacteria was considered intermediate or resistant to the antibiotic.

    Measured: Day 6

  12. Median in Vitro MIC Against AZD0914/ETX0914 and Ceftriaxone of Gonococcal Isolates From Culture of Isolates From the Pharyngeal Site at Baseline

    For all positive cultures of specimens collected from the pharynx, isolates were collected and tested for antimicrobial susceptibility profiles and the MIC was determined. MIC was defined as the lowest concentration of an antimicrobial that inhibited the visible growth of a microorganism after overnight incubation. The MIC breakpoint was a chosen concentration of an antibiotic which defines whether a bacterial isolate is susceptible or resistant to the antibiotic. If the MIC was less than or equal to the susceptibility breakpoint, the bacteria was considered susceptible to the antibiotic. If the MIC was greater than this value, the bacteria was considered intermediate or resistant to the antibiotic.

    Measured: Day 1 (Baseline)

  13. Median in Vitro MIC Against AZD0914/ETX0914 and Ceftriaxone of Gonococcal Isolates From Culture of Isolates From the Pharyngeal Site at Day 6

    For all positive cultures of specimens collected from the pharynx, isolates were collected and tested for antimicrobial susceptibility profiles and the MIC was determined. MIC was defined as the lowest concentration of an antimicrobial that inhibited the visible growth of a microorganism after overnight incubation. The MIC breakpoint was a chosen concentration of an antibiotic which defines whether a bacterial isolate is susceptible or resistant to the antibiotic. If the MIC was less than or equal to the susceptibility breakpoint, the bacteria was considered susceptible to the antibiotic. If the MIC was greater than this value, the bacteria was considered intermediate or resistant to the antibiotic.

    Measured: Day 6

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 Oct 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study start25 Nov 2014
  3. Primary completion30 Dec 2015
  4. Study completion30 Dec 2015

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Enrolment
180 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02257918
Sponsor's protocol ID
14-0014
Other IDs
HHSN272201300012I
Status last verified
5 Jan 2016
First submitted
19 Sep 2014
Last updated
22 Mar 2017
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Taylor SN, Marrazzo J, Batteiger BE, Hook EW 3rd, Sena AC, Long J, Wierzbicki MR, Kwak H, Johnson SM, Lawrence K, Mueller J. Single-Dose Zoliflodacin (ETX0914) for Treatment of Urogenital Gonorrhea. N Engl J Med. 2018 Nov 8;379(19):1835-1845. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1706988.

    PubMed 30403954

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing AZD0914 and Ceftriaxone in people with Gonorrhoea, run by National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) at 5 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Mar 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 5 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 8 Feb 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of Participants With Microbiological Cure at Urethral or Cervical Sites in Each Study Arm (time frame: Day 6). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02257918, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Mar 2017.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in