Type 1 DiabetesREPLACE-BGNCT02258373
A Trial Comparing Continuous Glucose Monitoring With and Without Routine Blood Glucose Monitoring in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes
A study testing CGM+BGM and CGM Only in people with Type 1 Diabetes, run by Jaeb Center for Health Research at 14 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The primary objective of the study is to determine whether the routine use of Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) without Blood Glucose Monitoring (BGM) confirmation is as safe and effective as CGM used as an adjunct to BGM. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Type 1 Diabetes
- What is being tested?
- CGM+BGM and CGM Only
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 226 participants
- Where
- 14 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Mar 2015to Oct 2016
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- To be eligible, all participants must meet the following inclusion criteria:
- Clinical diagnosis of type 1 diabetes (based on investigator's judgment)
- Age >=18 years
- T1D duration >=1
- HbA1c <=9.0% (a local laboratory or DCA2000 or comparable point of care device will be used to assess eligibility)
- Use of an insulin pump for insulin delivery for at least 3 months, with no plans to discontinue pump use during the next 8 months
Show all 9Show fewer
- Participant is able to manage his/her diabetes with respect to insulin administration and glucose monitoring, as assessed by the investigator during the screening visit
- Participant understands the study protocol and agrees to comply with it, including willingness to use the study CGM and BGM
- No expectation that participant will be moving out of the area of the clinical center during the time period of the study, unless the move will be to an area served by another study center
Who cannot join
- Individuals who meet any of the following criteria are not eligible for the study:
- Severe hypoglycemia in the last 12 months in which the assistance of another individual was needed or seizure/loss of consciousness in the past 3 years
- Significant hypoglycemia unawareness based on the Clarke Hypoglycemia Unawareness Survey defined as at least one of the following being present:
- Survey score >2
- Survey Q1 is answered as 'I no longer have symptoms when my blood sugar is low'
- Survey Q7 response indicates that symptoms of hypoglycemia are not felt until glucose level is <50 mg/dl
Show all 33Show fewer
- Survey Q8 response is never or rarely to the question 'to what extent can you tell by your symptoms that your blood sugar is low'
- More than one DKA event in the past year
- History of seizures other than due to hypoglycemia
- Current use of a threshold suspend pump feature (note: participant is eligible if a pump with this feature was being used but the threshold suspend was not active)
- Myocardial infarction or stroke in past 6 months
- Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) <30 obtained within the prior 12 months as part of usual care or kidney transplant
- Most recent thyroid function test results abnormal, obtained as part of usual care within the prior 2 years
- The presence of a significant medical or psychiatric disorder or use of a medication that in the judgment of the investigator will affect the wearing of the sensors, the completion of any aspect of the protocol, or increase risk
- Cognitive difficulties that, in the judgment of the investigator, could impair the individual's ability to follow the protocol or increase risk
- Initiation of a non-insulin drug for glucose control during the past 3 months, planned initiation during the next 8 months, or discontinuation of a non-insulin drug for glucose control during the past 3 months (note: individuals using a non-insulin medication for glucose control for 3 or more months are eligible provided there is no expectation that the medication will be discontinued during the time period of study participation)
- Use of a systemic beta blocker drug
- Regular use of oral corticosteroids
- Anticipated need to use acetaminophen during the time course of the study
- Inpatient psychiatric treatment in the past 6 months
- Currently pregnant or lactating or plan to attempt getting pregnant during the time period of the study
- Females with child-bearing potential will be queried about the possibility of pregnancy and a urine pregnancy test will be performed if there is uncertainty as to the possibility of pregnancy. They must agree to use appropriate birth control during the time period of the study. Participants will receive education regarding birth control methods which may be considered as highly effective, which are methods that can achieve a failure rate less than 1% per year when used consistently and correctly and include:
- Combined hormonal contraception associated with inhibition of ovulation (oral, intravaginal, transdermal)
- Progestogen-only hormonal contraception associated with inhibition of ovulation (oral, injectable, implantable)
- Intrauterine device (IUD)
- Intrauterine hormone-releasing system (IUS)
- Bilateral tubal occlusion
- Vasectomised partner
- Sexual abstinence
- Participation in an intervention study (including psychological studies) in past 6 weeks
- Known adhesive allergy
- From the blinded run-in phase (or from pre-study CGM use if criteria met to skip the blinded run-in phase), CGM values <60 mg/dl for more than 10.0% of the time
- Unsuccessful completion of the run-in phases with respect to CGM or BGM use
Trial locations and contacts
14 sites in 1 country.
14 sites in 1 country
United States14 sites
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109-5456
Atlanta Diabetes
Atlanta, Georgia, 30318
University of Southern California
Beverly Hills, California, 90211
Joslin Diabetes Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 02215
Northwestern University
Chicago, Illinois, 60611
Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes
Denver, Colorado, 80045
Iowa Diabetes and Endocrinology Center
Des Moines, Iowa, 50314
Henry Ford Health System
Detroit, Michigan, 48202
International Diabetes Center-Park Nicollet
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55416
University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104-5160
Oregon Health and Science University
Portland, Oregon, 97239
Scripps Health
San Diego, California, 92121
University of Washington
Seattle, Washington, 98105
University of South Florida
Tampa, Florida, 33612
About this study
Official title: A Randomized Trial Comparing Continuous Glucose Monitoring With and Without Routine Blood Glucose Monitoring in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes
The primary objective of the study is to determine whether the routine use of Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) without Blood Glucose Monitoring (BGM) confirmation is as safe and effective as CGM used as an adjunct to BGM.
Read the detailed description
CGM offers the opportunity to improve glycemic control, including a reduction in hypoglycemia. Unlike home blood glucose monitors, CGM is not intended to be used directly for making therapy adjustments and is an adjunctive device to supplement information obtained from a standard blood glucose monitor. However, although the labeling for CGM requires a BGM measurement before making a therapy adjustment, many CGM users often decide on a meal bolus based on CGM alone.
A study comparing CGM used solely as an adjunctive device, as per the FDA labeling, versus CGM used largely in lieu of BGM measurements would provide valuable data. Since many individuals with T1D are often using CGM alone when bolusing insulin, obtaining data on the safety and efficacy of this approach will be important. If indeed insulin dosing decisions are proven to be safe and effective using CGM alone (without BGM confirmation) compared to CGM with BGM confirmations, this study would also pave the way for a new standard diabetes management protocol and therapy that would not require eight BGM measurements (i.e. finger sticks) a day and ease the burden of managing type 1 diabetes.
For this study, participants will be randomly assigned with 2:1 probability to the CGM Only and CGM+BGM groups, respectively. Prior to randomization, the study will be preceded by a run-in period of up to 10 weeks to collect blinded baseline CGM data, to train the participants on CGM use, to assess compliance with CGM use, and to initiate standard CGM use. During the standard CGM use run-in phase, visits will occur after 2, 4 and 8 weeks, with phone calls at 1, 3, and 6 weeks. Current CGM users may be eligible to skip part of the run-in phase. Participants successfully completing the run-in phase will be randomized.
Both groups will use CGM devices and BGM. The CGM device to be used in the study is the Dexcom G4 Platinum Continuous Glucose Monitoring System with modified algorithm. The CGM+BGM group will be instructed to measure the blood glucose whenever a diabetes management decision is made. The CGM Only group will be instructed to only measure the blood glucose (other than for calibration) with a standard BGM meter in certain circumstances and will use a blinded BGM meter at times when a standard BGM measurement is not done. Following randomization, there will be a phone contact during the first week (4 to 8 days following randomization) to address any questions the participant has about the protocol. Follow up visits will occur at 3, 6, 13, 19 and 26 weeks.
- Conditions
- Type 1 Diabetes
- Being tested
- CGM+BGM, CGM Only
- Keywords
- Diabetes Mellitus, Continuous Glucose Monitoring
- Medical subject headings
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Diabetes Mellitus
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
CGM+BGMDevice
Dexcom G4 Platinum Continuous Glucose Monitoring System with modified algorithm + Abbot Precision Xtra Blood Glucose-Ketone Meter
CGM OnlyDevice
Dexcom G4 Platinum Continuous Glucose Monitoring System with modified algorithm
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| CGM Only | Experimental | Participants will be instructed to check the blood glucose with the standard study BGM for calibration of the CGM and for specific circumstances that are specified in the protocol. This group will make management decisions based on the CGM glucose value without a BGM confirmation measurement as long as the participant is confident that the CGM glucose value is not erroneous.
In addition, participants will be instructed to make a BGM measurement on the blinded study BGM before going to bed, whenever an insulin bolus is given and when treating or attempting to prevent hypoglycemia and a standard BGM measurement has not been made. The participant may be asked to make post-prandial blinded BGM measurements at selected times. Receives: Device: CGM Only |
| CGM+BGM | Active comparator | Participants will be instructed to perform BGM measurements for sensor calibration according to Dexcom specifications and measure the blood glucose whenever a diabetes management decision is made. A BGM measurement is to be made on the study BGM before going to bed, whenever an insulin bolus is given and when treating or attempting to prevent hypoglycemia. Additional BGM measurements can be made on the study BGM at any time that the participant desires. Receives: Device: CGM+BGM |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Time in Range of 70 to 180 mg/dl, Measured With CGM
Measured: Between baseline (randomization) and 6 months
Secondary outcomes (17)
Mean Glucose
Measured: Between baseline (randomization) and 6 months
Measures of Glycemic Variability: Coefficient of Variation
Coefficient of variation = SD/mean
Measured: Between baseline (randomization) and 6 months
Percentage of Time With Sensor Value <70 mg/dl, Measured With CGM
Measured: Between baseline (randomization) and 6 months
Percentage of Time With Sensor Values <60 mg/dl, Measured With CGM
Measured: Between baseline (randomization) and 6 months
Percentage of Time With Sensor Values <50 mg/dl, Measured With CGM
Measured: Between baseline (randomization) and 6 months
Percentage of Days With at Least 20 Minutes of Sensor Glucose Values <60 mg/dl
Measured: Between baseline (randomization) and 6 months
Percentage of Time With Sensor Values >180 mg/dl, Measured With CGM
Measured: Between baseline (randomization) and 6 months
Percentage of Time With Sensor Values > 250 mg/dl, Measured With CGM
Measured: Between baseline (randomization) and 6 months
Percentage of Time With Sensor Values > 300 mg/dl, Measured With CGM
Measured: Between baseline (randomization) and 6 months
Percentage of Days With at Least 20 Minutes of Sensor Glucose Values >300 mg/dl
Measured: Between baseline (randomization) and 6 months
Change in HbA1c
Measured: Between baseline (randomization) and 6 months
Number of Participants With no Worsening of HbA1c by Greater Than 0.3% AND no Severe Hypoglycemia Event
Measured: Between baseline (randomization) and 6 months
Number of Participants With >=1 Severe Hypoglycemia Events
Measured: Between baseline (randomization) and 6 months
Number of Participants With >=1 Diabetic Ketoacidosis (DKA) Events
Measured: Between baseline (randomization) and 6 months
Number of Participants With >=1 Ketotic Events Not Meeting Criteria for DKA With Blood Ketone Level >=0.6 mmol/L
Measured: Between baseline (randomization) and 6 months
Number of Participants With >=1 Ketotic Events Not Meeting Criteria for DKA With Blood Ketone Level >=1.0 mmol/L
Measured: Between baseline (randomization) and 6 months
Number of Participants With >=1 Serious Adverse Event Other Than SH
A serious adverse event is any untoward occurrence that:
- Results in death.
- Is life-threatening; (a non-life-threatening event which, had it been more severe, might have become life-threatening, is not necessarily considered a serious adverse event).
- Requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization.
- Results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity or substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions (sight threatening).
- Is a congenital anomaly or birth defect.
- Is considered a significant medical event by the investigator based on medical judgment.
Measured: Between baseline (randomization) and 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 Oct 2014 (estimated)
- Study startMar 2015
- Primary completionOct 2016
- Study completionOct 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Type 1 DiabetesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 226 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Jaeb Center for Health Research
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Katrina Ruedy, MSPH, Principal investigator, Jaeb Center for Health Research
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02258373
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- T1DX-REPLACE-BG
- Acronym
- REPLACE-BG
- Status last verified
- Aug 2018
- First submitted
- 2 Oct 2014
- Last updated
- 9 Aug 2018
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Herrero P, Reddy M, Georgiou P, Oliver NS. Identifying Continuous Glucose Monitoring Data Using Machine Learning. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2022 Jun;24(6):403-408. doi: 10.1089/dia.2021.0498. Epub 2022 May 12.
PubMed 35099288Aleppo G, Ruedy KJ, Riddlesworth TD, Kruger DF, Peters AL, Hirsch I, Bergenstal RM, Toschi E, Ahmann AJ, Shah VN, Rickels MR, Bode BW, Philis-Tsimikas A, Pop-Busui R, Rodriguez H, Eyth E, Bhargava A, Kollman C, Beck RW; REPLACE-BG Study Group. REPLACE-BG: A Randomized Trial Comparing Continuous Glucose Monitoring With and Without Routine Blood Glucose Monitoring in Adults With Well-Controlled Type 1 Diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2017 Apr;40(4):538-545. doi: 10.2337/dc16-2482. Epub 2017 Feb 16.
PubMed 28209654
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Aug 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized Trial Comparing Continuous Glucose Monitoring With and Without Routine Blood Glucose Monitoring in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02258373
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- REPLACE-BG / T1DX-REPLACE-BG
- Conditions
- Type 1 Diabetes
- Keywords
- Diabetes Mellitus, Continuous Glucose Monitoring
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 226 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Jaeb Center for Health ResearchUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Mar 2015
- Primary completion
- Oct 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- Oct 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 7 Oct 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 9 Aug 2018
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The primary objective of the study is to determine whether the routine use of Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) without Blood Glucose Monitoring (BGM) confirmation is as safe and effective as CGM used as an adjunct to BGM.
Detailed description
CGM offers the opportunity to improve glycemic control, including a reduction in hypoglycemia. Unlike home blood glucose monitors, CGM is not intended to be used directly for making therapy adjustments and is an adjunctive device to supplement information obtained from a standard blood glucose monitor. However, although the labeling for CGM requires a BGM measurement before making a therapy adjustment, many CGM users often decide on a meal bolus based on CGM alone.
A study comparing CGM used solely as an adjunctive device, as per the FDA labeling, versus CGM used largely in lieu of BGM measurements would provide valuable data. Since many individuals with T1D are often using CGM alone when bolusing insulin, obtaining data on the safety and efficacy of this approach will be important. If indeed insulin dosing decisions are proven to be safe and effective using CGM alone (without BGM confirmation) compared to CGM with BGM confirmations, this study would also pave the way for a new standard diabetes management protocol and therapy that would not require eight BGM measurements (i.e. finger sticks) a day and ease the burden of managing type 1 diabetes.
For this study, participants will be randomly assigned with 2:1 probability to the CGM Only and CGM+BGM groups, respectively. Prior to randomization, the study will be preceded by a run-in period of up to 10 weeks to collect blinded baseline CGM data, to train the participants on CGM use, to assess compliance with CGM use, and to initiate standard CGM use. During the standard CGM use run-in phase, visits will occur after 2, 4 and 8 weeks, with phone calls at 1, 3, and 6 weeks. Current CGM users may be eligible to skip part of the run-in phase. Participants successfully completing the run-in phase will be randomized.
Both groups will use CGM devices and BGM. The CGM device to be used in the study is the Dexcom G4 Platinum Continuous Glucose Monitoring System with modified algorithm. The CGM+BGM group will be instructed to measure the blood glucose whenever a diabetes management decision is made. The CGM Only group will be instructed to only measure the blood glucose (other than for calibration) with a standard BGM meter in certain circumstances and will use a blinded BGM meter at times when a standard BGM measurement is not done. Following randomization, there will be a phone contact during the first week (4 to 8 days following randomization) to address any questions the participant has about the protocol. Follow up visits will occur at 3, 6, 13, 19 and 26 weeks.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| CGM Only | Experimental | Device: CGM OnlyParticipants will be instructed to check the blood glucose with the standard study BGM for calibration of the CGM and for specific circumstances that are specified in the protocol. This group will make management decisions based on the CGM glucose value without a BGM confirmation measurement as long as the participant is confident that the CGM glucose value is not erroneous. In addition, participants will be instructed to make a BGM measurement on the blinded study BGM before going to bed, whenever an insulin bolus is given and when treating or attempting to prevent hypoglycemia and a standard BGM measurement has not been made. The participant may be asked to make post-prandial blinded BGM measurements at selected times. |
| CGM+BGM | Active comparator | Device: CGM+BGMParticipants will be instructed to perform BGM measurements for sensor calibration according to Dexcom specifications and measure the blood glucose whenever a diabetes management decision is made. A BGM measurement is to be made on the study BGM before going to bed, whenever an insulin bolus is given and when treating or attempting to prevent hypoglycemia. Additional BGM measurements can be made on the study BGM at any time that the participant desires. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Clinical diagnosis of type 1 diabetes (based on investigator's judgment)
- Age >=18 years
- T1D duration >=1
- HbA1c <=9.0% (a local laboratory or DCA2000 or comparable point of care device will be used to assess eligibility)
- Use of an insulin pump for insulin delivery for at least 3 months, with no plans to discontinue pump use during the next 8 months
Key exclusion criteria (33 listed)
- Severe hypoglycemia in the last 12 months in which the assistance of another individual was needed or seizure/loss of consciousness in the past 3 years
- Significant hypoglycemia unawareness based on the Clarke Hypoglycemia Unawareness Survey defined as at least one of the following being present:
- More than one DKA event in the past year
- History of seizures other than due to hypoglycemia
- Current use of a threshold suspend pump feature (note: participant is eligible if a pump with this feature was being used but the threshold suspend was not active)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| CGM+BGMDexcom G4 Platinum Continuous Glucose Monitoring System with modified algorithm + Abbot Precision Xtra Blood Glucose-Ketone Meter | Device | CGM+BGM |
| CGM OnlyDexcom G4 Platinum Continuous Glucose Monitoring System with modified algorithm | Device | CGM Only |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Time in Range of 70 to 180 mg/dl, Measured With CGM
Time frame: Between baseline (randomization) and 6 months
17 secondary outcomes
Mean Glucose
Time frame: Between baseline (randomization) and 6 months
Measures of Glycemic Variability: Coefficient of Variation
Time frame: Between baseline (randomization) and 6 months
Percentage of Time With Sensor Value <70 mg/dl, Measured With CGM
Time frame: Between baseline (randomization) and 6 months
Percentage of Time With Sensor Values <60 mg/dl, Measured With CGM
Time frame: Between baseline (randomization) and 6 months
Percentage of Time With Sensor Values <50 mg/dl, Measured With CGM
Time frame: Between baseline (randomization) and 6 months
Percentage of Days With at Least 20 Minutes of Sensor Glucose Values <60 mg/dl
Time frame: Between baseline (randomization) and 6 months
Percentage of Time With Sensor Values >180 mg/dl, Measured With CGM
Time frame: Between baseline (randomization) and 6 months
Percentage of Time With Sensor Values > 250 mg/dl, Measured With CGM
Time frame: Between baseline (randomization) and 6 months
Percentage of Time With Sensor Values > 300 mg/dl, Measured With CGM
Time frame: Between baseline (randomization) and 6 months
Percentage of Days With at Least 20 Minutes of Sensor Glucose Values >300 mg/dl
Time frame: Between baseline (randomization) and 6 months
Change in HbA1c
Time frame: Between baseline (randomization) and 6 months
Number of Participants With no Worsening of HbA1c by Greater Than 0.3% AND no Severe Hypoglycemia Event
Time frame: Between baseline (randomization) and 6 months
Number of Participants With >=1 Severe Hypoglycemia Events
Time frame: Between baseline (randomization) and 6 months
Number of Participants With >=1 Diabetic Ketoacidosis (DKA) Events
Time frame: Between baseline (randomization) and 6 months
Number of Participants With >=1 Ketotic Events Not Meeting Criteria for DKA With Blood Ketone Level >=0.6 mmol/L
Time frame: Between baseline (randomization) and 6 months
Number of Participants With >=1 Ketotic Events Not Meeting Criteria for DKA With Blood Ketone Level >=1.0 mmol/L
Time frame: Between baseline (randomization) and 6 months
Number of Participants With >=1 Serious Adverse Event Other Than SH
Time frame: Between baseline (randomization) and 6 months
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Aug 2018.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 35099288Herrero P, Reddy M, Georgiou P, Oliver NS. Identifying Continuous Glucose Monitoring Data Using Machine Learning. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2022 Jun;24(6):403-408. doi: 10.1089/dia.2021.0498. Epub 2022 May 12.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 28209654Aleppo G, Ruedy KJ, Riddlesworth TD, Kruger DF, Peters AL, Hirsch I, Bergenstal RM, Toschi E, Ahmann AJ, Shah VN, Rickels MR, Bode BW, Philis-Tsimikas A, Pop-Busui R, Rodriguez H, Eyth E, Bhargava A, Kollman C, Beck RW; REPLACE-BG Study Group. REPLACE-BG: A Randomized Trial Comparing Continuous Glucose Monitoring With and Without Routine Blood Glucose Monitoring in Adults With Well-Controlled Type 1 Diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2017 Apr;40(4):538-545. doi: 10.2337/dc16-2482. Epub 2017 Feb 16.
Related trials for Type 1 Diabetes
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
A Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness and Safety of the Drug AZD6234 for Managing Weight in Adults Who Are Obese or Overweight. These Participants May or May Not Also Have Type 2 Diabetes
Obesity, Overweight
RecruitingPhase 1
Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Immunogenicity Comparison of Bmab1700 and Opdivo® as Adjuvant Monotherapy in Participants With Melanoma
Melanoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
A Study of Botensilimab and Balstilimab for the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
Not yet recruiting
Inter-Arm Differences in Continuous Glucose Monitor Readings in Adults With Diabetes
Continuous Glucose Monitoring, Type 1 Diabetes
RecruitingObservational study
Estimated Risk of Preeclampsia in the First Trimester and Its Association With Subclinical Atherosclerosis and Cardiovascular Risk in Women With Type 1 Diabetes
Type 1 Diabetes, Preeclampsia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Katrina Ruedy, MSPH principal investigator
Jaeb Center for Health Research
14 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing CGM+BGM and CGM Only in people with Type 1 Diabetes, run by Jaeb Center for Health Research at 14 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 33 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Aug 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 14 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 9 Aug 2018). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Time in Range of 70 to 180 mg/dl, Measured With CGM (time frame: Between baseline (randomization) and 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02258373, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Aug 2018.