AzTrials
AzTrials

Cerebral HemorrhageSWITCHNCT02258919

Decompressive Hemicraniectomy in Intracerebral Hemorrhage

A study testing Decompressive craniectomy (DC) and best medical treatment and Best medical treatment in people with Cerebral Hemorrhage, run by Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern at 32 sites in 8 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) remains a devastating disease with mortality rates up to 52% at 30 days. It is a major public health problem with an annual incidence of 10-30 per 100'000 population, accounting for 2 million (10-15%) of about 15 million strokes worldwide each year. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 75 years
Conditions the study is for
Cerebral Hemorrhage
What is being tested?
Decompressive craniectomy (DC) and best medical treatment and Best medical treatment
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
201 participants
Where
32 sitesin 8 countries
Study dates
Oct 2014to 23 May 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 75 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Written informed consent of the patient or of patient's next of kin plus consent of an independent physician if patient is unable to consent before randomization
  • Acute stroke syndrome due to a spontaneous ICH, defined as the sudden occurrence of bleeding into the parenchyma of the basal ganglia and/or thalamus that may extend into the ventricles and into the cerebral lobes, and into the subarachnoid space, confirmed by clinical history and imaging
  • Age: ≥18 to ≤75 years
  • Glasgow coma scale (GCS) <14 and >7
  • Neurological deficit with a NIHSS score of ≥10 and ≤30
  • Able to be randomly assigned to surgical treatment within 66 hours after ictus
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Surgery performed not later than 6 hours after randomization
  • Volume of hematoma ≥30 ml and ≤100 ml
  • Stable clot volume
  • International normalized ratio (INR) <1.5, thrombocytes >100 T/ml

Who cannot join

  • ICH due to known or suspected structural abnormality in the brain (e.g., intracranial aneurysm, brain arteriovenous malformation, brain tumor) or brain trauma, or previous stroke thrombolysis
  • Cerebellar or brainstem hemorrhage
  • Exclusive lobar hemorrhage
  • Known advanced dementia or significant pre-stroke disability
  • Concomitant medical illness that would interfere with outcome assessment and follow-up
  • Randomization not possible within 66 hours after ictus
Show all 15Show fewer
  • Pregnancy
  • Prior major brain surgery within <6 month or prior DC
  • Foreseeable difficulties in follow-up due to geographic reasons
  • Known definite contraindication for a surgical procedure
  • A very high likelihood that the patient will die within the next 24 hours on the basis of clinical and/or radiological criteria
  • Previous participation in this trial or in another ongoing investigational trial
  • Prior symptomatic ICH
  • ICH secondary to thrombolysis
  • Bilateral areactive pupils

Trial locations and contacts

32 sites in 8 countries.

32 sites in 8 countries

Germany18 sites
  • Klinik für Neurochirurgie Uniklinik RWTH Aachen

    Aachen, 52074

  • Department of Neurosurgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin

    Berlin, 13353

  • Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurochirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Bonn

    Bonn, 53127

  • Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf

    Düsseldorf, 40225

  • Klinik für Neurochirugie, Helios Klinikum Erfurt

    Erfurt, Thuringia, 99089

  • Neurologische Klinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen

    Erlangen, 91054

  • Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Essen (AöR)

    Essen, 45147

  • Zentrum der Neurologie und Neurochirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt

    Frankfurt, 60590

  • Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg

    Freiburg im Breisgau, 79106

  • Neurochirurgische Klinik, Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg UKGM

    Giessen, 35392

  • Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen

    Göttingen, 37075

  • Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Klinikum Kassel

    Kassel, 34125

  • Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig Holstein

    Lübeck, Schleswig-Holstein, 23562

  • Neurochirurgische Klinik, Universitätsmedizin Mainz

    Mainz, 55116

  • Neurochirurgische Klinik, Universitätsklinikum Mannheim

    Mannheim, 68167

  • Dep. of Neurosurgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München

    Munich, 81675

  • Klinik für Allgemeine Neurologie, Universitätsklinikum Münster

    Münster, 48149

  • Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg

    Würzburg, 97080

Other trials in Germany

Switzerland4 sites
  • Dep. of Neurology / Dep. of Neurosurgery, Bern University Hospital

    Bern, 3010

  • Dep. of Clinical Neuroscience, Service of Neurosurgery

    Geneva, 1211

  • Dep. Neurosurgery, Ospedale Regionale di Lugano

    Lugano, 6903

  • Dep. of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Zürich

    Zurich, 8091

Other trials in Switzerland

Spain3 sites
  • Servicio de Neurocirurgía Bellvitge Hospital

    Barcelona, 08907

  • Servicio de Neurología, Hospital Universitario La Paz

    Madrid, 28046

  • Servicios de Neurología, Neurocirugía y Cuidados Intensivos del Hospital Virgen del Rocío

    Seville, 41013

Other trials in Spain

France2 sites
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Caen

    Caen, 14033

  • Fondation Adolphe de Rothschild

    Paris, 75019

Other trials in France

Netherlands2 sites
  • Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology

    Amsterdam, 1105

  • University Medical Center Utrecht, Department of Neurology, Department of Neurosurgery

    Utrecht, 3584

Other trials in Netherlands

Austria1 site
  • Universitätsklinik für Neurochirurgie, Kepler Universitätsklinikum Linz

    Linz, 4020

Other trials in Austria

Belgium1 site
  • UZ Leuven

    Leuven, 3000

Other trials in Belgium

Finland1 site
  • Department of Neurology, Helsinki University Central Hospital

    Helsinki, 00290

Other trials in Finland

About this study

Official title: Swiss Trial of Decompressive Craniectomy Versus Best Medical Treatment of Spontaneous Supratentorial Intracerebral Hemorrhage (SWITCH): a Randomized Controlled Trial

Spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) remains a devastating disease with mortality rates up to 52% at 30 days. It is a major public health problem with an annual incidence of 10-30 per 100'000 population, accounting for 2 million (10-15%) of about 15 million strokes worldwide each year. The strategy of decompressive craniectomy (DC) is beneficial in patients with malignant middle cerebral artery (MCA) infarction. Based on the common pathophysiological mechanisms of these two conditions, this procedure is also frequently performed in patients with ICH, but is has not yet been investigated in a randomized trial.

The primary objective of this randomized controlled trial is to determine whether decompressive surgery and best medical treatment in patients with spontaneous ICH will improve outcome compared to best medical treatment only.

Secondary objectives are to analyze mortality, dependency and quality of life. Safety endpoints are to determine cause of any mortality and the rate of medical and surgical complications after DC compared with best medical treatment alone.

Read the detailed description

Background

Spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) remains a devastating disease with mortality rates up to 52% at 30 days. It is a major public health problem with an annual incidence of 10-30 per 100'000 population, accounting for 2 million (10-15%) of about 15 million strokes worldwide each year. One-third of patients with ICH die within one month and the majority of survivors remain handicapped. Neurological injury resulting from ICH is mediated by the mass effect of the hematoma, secondary to brain edema and/or both mechanisms. Treatment of ICH is one of the major unresolved issues of acute stroke treatment. The International Surgical Trials in Intracerebral Hemorrhage (STICH and STICH II) and other randomized controlled trials did not show any superiority of surgical treatment compared to conservative treatment approaches. Nevertheless, surgical treatment in ICH remains a matter of debate and attempts to improve outcome using surgical therapy are still ongoing. Many efforts are made to minimize the invasiveness of operative procedures such as clot evacuation. However, direct surgical interventions aiming at the removal of the hematoma have failed to improve neurological outcome for most subtypes of ICH, especially deep-seated hematomas. The trauma of open craniotomy and especially trauma to the brain parenchyma for hematoma evacuation are considered to outweigh the benefits of surgery.

Decompressive craniectomy (DC), which is beneficial in patients with malignant middle cerebral artery (MCA) infarction, may indirectly relieve the mass effect, decrease perihematomal tissue pressure, improve blood flow, reduce secondary brain damage and improve outcome without further damage to the brain due to surgery. Consequently, DC has been established as a standard surgical therapy for patients with malignant MCA infarction with a level of evidence grade 2. Decompressive craniectomy for acute stroke is one of the most effective treatments available: the number needed to be treated to save one patient's life is 2. Decompressive craniectomy is also a standard therapeutic procedure in patients with ICH due to sinus venous thrombosis, herpes encephalitis, or ruptured intracranial aneurysms. In patients with traumatic brain injury DC is a standard therapy to reduce elevated intracranial pressure. The investigators and others assessed whether DC is feasible and beneficial in patients with spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage. The investigators showed in a previous retrospective trial that DC in patients with supratentorial ICH is safe and feasible and may reduce mortality compared to matched controls with best medical treatment alone. The limitations of the feasibility trial are its retrospective design, the small sample size and the inhomogeneity of the patient cohort with respect to the origin of ICH. Furthermore, in the feasibility trial the decision for DC was taken on an individual basis rather than according to a strict protocol, introducing a potential selection bias. Nevertheless, the preliminary results are encouraging. Recently, three human trials, one animal study, one meta-analysis, and one original contribution have been published on this topic. However, no prospective randomized trial has ever assessed whether DC without hematoma evacuation in patients with acute ICH improves outcome. All recent studies showed promising results and all call for the initiation of a randomized controlled trial.

Objective

The primary objective of this randomized controlled trial is to determine whether decompressive surgery and best medical treatment in patients with spontaneous ICH will improve outcome compared to best medical treatment only.

Secondary objectives are to analyze mortality, dependency and quality of life. Safety endpoints are to determine cause of any mortality and the rate of medical and surgical complications after DC compared with best medical treatment alone.

Methods

All patients with a suspected intracerebral hemorrhage will be considered for this trial. Randomization of eligible patients will be performed within 66 hours after ictus in patients with stable clot volume and surgery no later than 6 hours after randomization. Patients randomized to the control group will receive best medical treatment according to international guidelines. Patients randomized to the treatment group will receive best medical treatment and a DC of at least 12cm according to institutional guidelines and a surgical protocol. The primary outcome death and dependency at 6 months will be assessed by a trained person unaware of treatment allocation. Favorable outcome is defined as a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0 to 4, poor outcome as modified Rankin Scale score of 5 or 6.

Being tested
Decompressive craniectomy (DC) and best medical treatment, Best medical treatment
Keywords
Intracerebral hemorrhage, Decompressive craniectomy, Randomized controlled trial, Acute stroke
Medical subject headings
Cerebral Hemorrhage, Stroke

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Decompressive craniectomy (DC) and best medical treatmentProcedure or surgery

    Decompressive craniectomy:

    All patients in the treatment group will receive DC of at least 12 cm according to institutional guidelines and a published surgical protocol.

    Best medical treatment:

    Best medical treatment is based on American Heart Association/American Stroke Association (AHA/ASA) and European Stroke Organisation (ESO) as published in the current protocol from 2010 and 2014 respectively.

  • Best medical treatmentProcedure or surgery

    Best medical treatment is based on American Heart Association/American Stroke Association (AHA/ASA) and European Stroke Organisation (ESO) as published in the current protocol from 2010 and 2014 respectively.

Study groups in NCT02258919
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Decompressive craniectomy and best medical treatmentExperimentalDecompressive craniectomy and best medical treatment
Receives: Procedure: Decompressive craniectomy (DC) and best medical treatment
Best medical treatmentActive comparatorBest medical treatment
Receives: Procedure: Best medical treatment

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Score in modified Rankin Scale (mRS)

    Assessed by telephone interview

    Measured: 6 months

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Mortality

    Measured: 7 days, 30 days, 180 days, 12 months

  2. mRS score of 0-3 versus 4-6

    Measured: 30 days, 180 days, 12 months

  3. Categorical shift in mRS score

    Measured: 180 days, 12 months

  4. Quality of life

    Measured: 180 days, 12 months

  5. Death and intracranial hemorrhage

    Measured: intraoperative

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 Oct 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study startOct 2014
  3. Primary completion15 Oct 2023
  4. Study completion23 May 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
201 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02258919
Sponsor's protocol ID
163/14
Other IDs
32003B_150009
Acronym
SWITCH
Status last verified
Nov 2024
First submitted
30 Sep 2014
Last updated
14 Nov 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Polymeris AA, Lang MF, Hakim A, Butikofer L, Fung C, Beyeler S, Z'Graggen W, Strbian D, Vajkoczy P, Schubert GA, Gruber A, Mielke D, Roelz R, Siepen B, Seiffge DJ, Selim MH, Raabe A, Beck J, Fischer U; SWITCH Study Investigators. Effect of Decompressive Craniectomy According to Location of Deep Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A SWITCH Trial Analysis. Stroke. 2026 Jan;57(1):12-19. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.125.052460. Epub 2025 Oct 17.

    PubMed 41104458
  • Beck J, Fung C, Strbian D, Butikofer L, Z'Graggen WJ, Lang MF, Beyeler S, Gralla J, Ringel F, Schaller K, Plesnila N, Arnold M, Hacke W, Juni P, Mendelow AD, Stapf C, Al-Shahi Salman R, Bressan J, Lerch S, Hakim A, Martinez-Majander N, Piippo-Karjalainen A, Vajkoczy P, Wolf S, Schubert GA, Hollig A, Veldeman M, Roelz R, Gruber A, Rauch P, Mielke D, Rohde V, Kerz T, Uhl E, Thanasi E, Huttner HB, Kallmunzer B, Jaap Kappelle L, Deinsberger W, Roth C, Lemmens R, Leppert J, Sanmillan JL, Coutinho JM, Hackenberg KAM, Reimann G, Mazighi M, Bassetti CLA, Mattle HP, Raabe A, Fischer U; SWITCH study investigators. Decompressive craniectomy plus best medical treatment versus best medical treatment alone for spontaneous severe deep supratentorial intracerebral haemorrhage: a randomised controlled clinical trial. Lancet. 2024 Jun 1;403(10442):2395-2404. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)00702-5. Epub 2024 May 15.

    PubMed 38761811
  • Fischer U, Fung C, Beyeler S, Butikofer L, Z'Graggen W, Ringel F, Gralla J, Schaller K, Plesnila N, Strbian D, Arnold M, Hacke W, Juni P, Mendelow AD, Stapf C, Al-Shahi Salman R, Bressan J, Lerch S, Bassetti CLA, Mattle HP, Raabe A, Beck J. Swiss trial of decompressive craniectomy versus best medical treatment of spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral haemorrhage (SWITCH): an international, multicentre, randomised-controlled, two-arm, assessor-blinded trial. Eur Stroke J. 2024 Sep;9(3):781-788. doi: 10.1177/23969873241231047. Epub 2024 Feb 12.

    PubMed 38347736

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Decompressive craniectomy (DC) and best medical treatment and Best medical treatment in people with Cerebral Hemorrhage, run by Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern at 32 sites in 8 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 15 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Nov 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 32 sites in Germany, Switzerland, Spain, France, Netherlands and 3 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Score in modified Rankin Scale (mRS) (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02258919, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Nov 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in