Cerebral HemorrhageSWITCHNCT02258919
Decompressive Hemicraniectomy in Intracerebral Hemorrhage
A study testing Decompressive craniectomy (DC) and best medical treatment and Best medical treatment in people with Cerebral Hemorrhage, run by Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern at 32 sites in 8 countries.
Trial summary
Spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) remains a devastating disease with mortality rates up to 52% at 30 days. It is a major public health problem with an annual incidence of 10-30 per 100'000 population, accounting for 2 million (10-15%) of about 15 million strokes worldwide each year. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Cerebral Hemorrhage
- What is being tested?
- Decompressive craniectomy (DC) and best medical treatment and Best medical treatment
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 201 participants
- Where
- 32 sitesin 8 countries
- Study dates
- Oct 2014to 23 May 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Written informed consent of the patient or of patient's next of kin plus consent of an independent physician if patient is unable to consent before randomization
- Acute stroke syndrome due to a spontaneous ICH, defined as the sudden occurrence of bleeding into the parenchyma of the basal ganglia and/or thalamus that may extend into the ventricles and into the cerebral lobes, and into the subarachnoid space, confirmed by clinical history and imaging
- Age: ≥18 to ≤75 years
- Glasgow coma scale (GCS) <14 and >7
- Neurological deficit with a NIHSS score of ≥10 and ≤30
- Able to be randomly assigned to surgical treatment within 66 hours after ictus
Show all 10Show fewer
- Surgery performed not later than 6 hours after randomization
- Volume of hematoma ≥30 ml and ≤100 ml
- Stable clot volume
- International normalized ratio (INR) <1.5, thrombocytes >100 T/ml
Who cannot join
- ICH due to known or suspected structural abnormality in the brain (e.g., intracranial aneurysm, brain arteriovenous malformation, brain tumor) or brain trauma, or previous stroke thrombolysis
- Cerebellar or brainstem hemorrhage
- Exclusive lobar hemorrhage
- Known advanced dementia or significant pre-stroke disability
- Concomitant medical illness that would interfere with outcome assessment and follow-up
- Randomization not possible within 66 hours after ictus
Show all 15Show fewer
- Pregnancy
- Prior major brain surgery within <6 month or prior DC
- Foreseeable difficulties in follow-up due to geographic reasons
- Known definite contraindication for a surgical procedure
- A very high likelihood that the patient will die within the next 24 hours on the basis of clinical and/or radiological criteria
- Previous participation in this trial or in another ongoing investigational trial
- Prior symptomatic ICH
- ICH secondary to thrombolysis
- Bilateral areactive pupils
Trial locations and contacts
32 sites in 8 countries.
32 sites in 8 countries
Germany18 sites
Klinik für Neurochirurgie Uniklinik RWTH Aachen
Aachen, 52074
Department of Neurosurgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Berlin, 13353
Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurochirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Bonn
Bonn, 53127
Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf
Düsseldorf, 40225
Klinik für Neurochirugie, Helios Klinikum Erfurt
Erfurt, Thuringia, 99089
Neurologische Klinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen
Erlangen, 91054
Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Essen (AöR)
Essen, 45147
Zentrum der Neurologie und Neurochirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt
Frankfurt, 60590
Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg
Freiburg im Breisgau, 79106
Neurochirurgische Klinik, Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg UKGM
Giessen, 35392
Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen
Göttingen, 37075
Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Klinikum Kassel
Kassel, 34125
Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig Holstein
Lübeck, Schleswig-Holstein, 23562
Neurochirurgische Klinik, Universitätsmedizin Mainz
Mainz, 55116
Neurochirurgische Klinik, Universitätsklinikum Mannheim
Mannheim, 68167
Dep. of Neurosurgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München
Munich, 81675
Klinik für Allgemeine Neurologie, Universitätsklinikum Münster
Münster, 48149
Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg
Würzburg, 97080
Switzerland4 sites
Dep. of Neurology / Dep. of Neurosurgery, Bern University Hospital
Bern, 3010
Dep. of Clinical Neuroscience, Service of Neurosurgery
Geneva, 1211
Dep. Neurosurgery, Ospedale Regionale di Lugano
Lugano, 6903
Dep. of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Zürich
Zurich, 8091
Spain3 sites
Servicio de Neurocirurgía Bellvitge Hospital
Barcelona, 08907
Servicio de Neurología, Hospital Universitario La Paz
Madrid, 28046
Servicios de Neurología, Neurocirugía y Cuidados Intensivos del Hospital Virgen del Rocío
Seville, 41013
France2 sites
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Caen
Caen, 14033
Fondation Adolphe de Rothschild
Paris, 75019
Netherlands2 sites
Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology
Amsterdam, 1105
University Medical Center Utrecht, Department of Neurology, Department of Neurosurgery
Utrecht, 3584
Austria1 site
Universitätsklinik für Neurochirurgie, Kepler Universitätsklinikum Linz
Linz, 4020
Finland1 site
Department of Neurology, Helsinki University Central Hospital
Helsinki, 00290
About this study
Official title: Swiss Trial of Decompressive Craniectomy Versus Best Medical Treatment of Spontaneous Supratentorial Intracerebral Hemorrhage (SWITCH): a Randomized Controlled Trial
Spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) remains a devastating disease with mortality rates up to 52% at 30 days. It is a major public health problem with an annual incidence of 10-30 per 100'000 population, accounting for 2 million (10-15%) of about 15 million strokes worldwide each year. The strategy of decompressive craniectomy (DC) is beneficial in patients with malignant middle cerebral artery (MCA) infarction. Based on the common pathophysiological mechanisms of these two conditions, this procedure is also frequently performed in patients with ICH, but is has not yet been investigated in a randomized trial.
The primary objective of this randomized controlled trial is to determine whether decompressive surgery and best medical treatment in patients with spontaneous ICH will improve outcome compared to best medical treatment only.
Secondary objectives are to analyze mortality, dependency and quality of life. Safety endpoints are to determine cause of any mortality and the rate of medical and surgical complications after DC compared with best medical treatment alone.
Read the detailed description
Background
Spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) remains a devastating disease with mortality rates up to 52% at 30 days. It is a major public health problem with an annual incidence of 10-30 per 100'000 population, accounting for 2 million (10-15%) of about 15 million strokes worldwide each year. One-third of patients with ICH die within one month and the majority of survivors remain handicapped. Neurological injury resulting from ICH is mediated by the mass effect of the hematoma, secondary to brain edema and/or both mechanisms. Treatment of ICH is one of the major unresolved issues of acute stroke treatment. The International Surgical Trials in Intracerebral Hemorrhage (STICH and STICH II) and other randomized controlled trials did not show any superiority of surgical treatment compared to conservative treatment approaches. Nevertheless, surgical treatment in ICH remains a matter of debate and attempts to improve outcome using surgical therapy are still ongoing. Many efforts are made to minimize the invasiveness of operative procedures such as clot evacuation. However, direct surgical interventions aiming at the removal of the hematoma have failed to improve neurological outcome for most subtypes of ICH, especially deep-seated hematomas. The trauma of open craniotomy and especially trauma to the brain parenchyma for hematoma evacuation are considered to outweigh the benefits of surgery.
Decompressive craniectomy (DC), which is beneficial in patients with malignant middle cerebral artery (MCA) infarction, may indirectly relieve the mass effect, decrease perihematomal tissue pressure, improve blood flow, reduce secondary brain damage and improve outcome without further damage to the brain due to surgery. Consequently, DC has been established as a standard surgical therapy for patients with malignant MCA infarction with a level of evidence grade 2. Decompressive craniectomy for acute stroke is one of the most effective treatments available: the number needed to be treated to save one patient's life is 2. Decompressive craniectomy is also a standard therapeutic procedure in patients with ICH due to sinus venous thrombosis, herpes encephalitis, or ruptured intracranial aneurysms. In patients with traumatic brain injury DC is a standard therapy to reduce elevated intracranial pressure. The investigators and others assessed whether DC is feasible and beneficial in patients with spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage. The investigators showed in a previous retrospective trial that DC in patients with supratentorial ICH is safe and feasible and may reduce mortality compared to matched controls with best medical treatment alone. The limitations of the feasibility trial are its retrospective design, the small sample size and the inhomogeneity of the patient cohort with respect to the origin of ICH. Furthermore, in the feasibility trial the decision for DC was taken on an individual basis rather than according to a strict protocol, introducing a potential selection bias. Nevertheless, the preliminary results are encouraging. Recently, three human trials, one animal study, one meta-analysis, and one original contribution have been published on this topic. However, no prospective randomized trial has ever assessed whether DC without hematoma evacuation in patients with acute ICH improves outcome. All recent studies showed promising results and all call for the initiation of a randomized controlled trial.
Objective
The primary objective of this randomized controlled trial is to determine whether decompressive surgery and best medical treatment in patients with spontaneous ICH will improve outcome compared to best medical treatment only.
Secondary objectives are to analyze mortality, dependency and quality of life. Safety endpoints are to determine cause of any mortality and the rate of medical and surgical complications after DC compared with best medical treatment alone.
Methods
All patients with a suspected intracerebral hemorrhage will be considered for this trial. Randomization of eligible patients will be performed within 66 hours after ictus in patients with stable clot volume and surgery no later than 6 hours after randomization. Patients randomized to the control group will receive best medical treatment according to international guidelines. Patients randomized to the treatment group will receive best medical treatment and a DC of at least 12cm according to institutional guidelines and a surgical protocol. The primary outcome death and dependency at 6 months will be assessed by a trained person unaware of treatment allocation. Favorable outcome is defined as a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0 to 4, poor outcome as modified Rankin Scale score of 5 or 6.
- Conditions
- Cerebral Hemorrhage
- Being tested
- Decompressive craniectomy (DC) and best medical treatment, Best medical treatment
- Keywords
- Intracerebral hemorrhage, Decompressive craniectomy, Randomized controlled trial, Acute stroke
- Medical subject headings
- Cerebral Hemorrhage, Stroke
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Decompressive craniectomy (DC) and best medical treatmentProcedure or surgery
Decompressive craniectomy:
All patients in the treatment group will receive DC of at least 12 cm according to institutional guidelines and a published surgical protocol.
Best medical treatment:
Best medical treatment is based on American Heart Association/American Stroke Association (AHA/ASA) and European Stroke Organisation (ESO) as published in the current protocol from 2010 and 2014 respectively.
Best medical treatmentProcedure or surgery
Best medical treatment is based on American Heart Association/American Stroke Association (AHA/ASA) and European Stroke Organisation (ESO) as published in the current protocol from 2010 and 2014 respectively.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Decompressive craniectomy and best medical treatment | Experimental | Decompressive craniectomy and best medical treatment Receives: Procedure: Decompressive craniectomy (DC) and best medical treatment |
| Best medical treatment | Active comparator | Best medical treatment Receives: Procedure: Best medical treatment |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Score in modified Rankin Scale (mRS)
Assessed by telephone interview
Measured: 6 months
Secondary outcomes (5)
Mortality
Measured: 7 days, 30 days, 180 days, 12 months
mRS score of 0-3 versus 4-6
Measured: 30 days, 180 days, 12 months
Categorical shift in mRS score
Measured: 180 days, 12 months
Quality of life
Measured: 180 days, 12 months
Death and intracranial hemorrhage
Measured: intraoperative
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Oct 2014 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2014
- Primary completion15 Oct 2023
- Study completion23 May 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Cerebral HemorrhageStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital BernThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 201 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Urs Fischer, Prof. Dr. med., Study director, Dep. of Neurology, Inselspital BernJürgen Beck, Prof. Dr. med., Study chair, Dep. of Neurosurgery, Inselspital Bern
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02258919
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 163/14
- Other IDs
- 32003B_150009
- Acronym
- SWITCH
- Status last verified
- Nov 2024
- First submitted
- 30 Sep 2014
- Last updated
- 14 Nov 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Polymeris AA, Lang MF, Hakim A, Butikofer L, Fung C, Beyeler S, Z'Graggen W, Strbian D, Vajkoczy P, Schubert GA, Gruber A, Mielke D, Roelz R, Siepen B, Seiffge DJ, Selim MH, Raabe A, Beck J, Fischer U; SWITCH Study Investigators. Effect of Decompressive Craniectomy According to Location of Deep Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A SWITCH Trial Analysis. Stroke. 2026 Jan;57(1):12-19. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.125.052460. Epub 2025 Oct 17.
PubMed 41104458Beck J, Fung C, Strbian D, Butikofer L, Z'Graggen WJ, Lang MF, Beyeler S, Gralla J, Ringel F, Schaller K, Plesnila N, Arnold M, Hacke W, Juni P, Mendelow AD, Stapf C, Al-Shahi Salman R, Bressan J, Lerch S, Hakim A, Martinez-Majander N, Piippo-Karjalainen A, Vajkoczy P, Wolf S, Schubert GA, Hollig A, Veldeman M, Roelz R, Gruber A, Rauch P, Mielke D, Rohde V, Kerz T, Uhl E, Thanasi E, Huttner HB, Kallmunzer B, Jaap Kappelle L, Deinsberger W, Roth C, Lemmens R, Leppert J, Sanmillan JL, Coutinho JM, Hackenberg KAM, Reimann G, Mazighi M, Bassetti CLA, Mattle HP, Raabe A, Fischer U; SWITCH study investigators. Decompressive craniectomy plus best medical treatment versus best medical treatment alone for spontaneous severe deep supratentorial intracerebral haemorrhage: a randomised controlled clinical trial. Lancet. 2024 Jun 1;403(10442):2395-2404. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)00702-5. Epub 2024 May 15.
PubMed 38761811Fischer U, Fung C, Beyeler S, Butikofer L, Z'Graggen W, Ringel F, Gralla J, Schaller K, Plesnila N, Strbian D, Arnold M, Hacke W, Juni P, Mendelow AD, Stapf C, Al-Shahi Salman R, Bressan J, Lerch S, Bassetti CLA, Mattle HP, Raabe A, Beck J. Swiss trial of decompressive craniectomy versus best medical treatment of spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral haemorrhage (SWITCH): an international, multicentre, randomised-controlled, two-arm, assessor-blinded trial. Eur Stroke J. 2024 Sep;9(3):781-788. doi: 10.1177/23969873241231047. Epub 2024 Feb 12.
PubMed 38347736
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 14 Nov 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Swiss Trial of Decompressive Craniectomy Versus Best Medical Treatment of Spontaneous Supratentorial Intracerebral Hemorrhage (SWITCH): a Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02258919
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SWITCH / 163/14
- Conditions
- Cerebral Hemorrhage
- Keywords
- Intracerebral hemorrhage, Decompressive craniectomy, Randomized controlled trial, Acute stroke
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 201 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital BernUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Oct 2014 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 15 Oct 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 23 May 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 8 Oct 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) remains a devastating disease with mortality rates up to 52% at 30 days. It is a major public health problem with an annual incidence of 10-30 per 100'000 population, accounting for 2 million (10-15%) of about 15 million strokes worldwide each year. The strategy of decompressive craniectomy (DC) is beneficial in patients with malignant middle cerebral artery (MCA) infarction. Based on the common pathophysiological mechanisms of these two conditions, this procedure is also frequently performed in patients with ICH, but is has not yet been investigated in a randomized trial.
The primary objective of this randomized controlled trial is to determine whether decompressive surgery and best medical treatment in patients with spontaneous ICH will improve outcome compared to best medical treatment only.
Secondary objectives are to analyze mortality, dependency and quality of life. Safety endpoints are to determine cause of any mortality and the rate of medical and surgical complications after DC compared with best medical treatment alone.
Detailed description
Background
Spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) remains a devastating disease with mortality rates up to 52% at 30 days. It is a major public health problem with an annual incidence of 10-30 per 100'000 population, accounting for 2 million (10-15%) of about 15 million strokes worldwide each year. One-third of patients with ICH die within one month and the majority of survivors remain handicapped. Neurological injury resulting from ICH is mediated by the mass effect of the hematoma, secondary to brain edema and/or both mechanisms. Treatment of ICH is one of the major unresolved issues of acute stroke treatment. The International Surgical Trials in Intracerebral Hemorrhage (STICH and STICH II) and other randomized controlled trials did not show any superiority of surgical treatment compared to conservative treatment approaches. Nevertheless, surgical treatment in ICH remains a matter of debate and attempts to improve outcome using surgical therapy are still ongoing. Many efforts are made to minimize the invasiveness of operative procedures such as clot evacuation. However, direct surgical interventions aiming at the removal of the hematoma have failed to improve neurological outcome for most subtypes of ICH, especially deep-seated hematomas. The trauma of open craniotomy and especially trauma to the brain parenchyma for hematoma evacuation are considered to outweigh the benefits of surgery.
Decompressive craniectomy (DC), which is beneficial in patients with malignant middle cerebral artery (MCA) infarction, may indirectly relieve the mass effect, decrease perihematomal tissue pressure, improve blood flow, reduce secondary brain damage and improve outcome without further damage to the brain due to surgery. Consequently, DC has been established as a standard surgical therapy for patients with malignant MCA infarction with a level of evidence grade 2. Decompressive craniectomy for acute stroke is one of the most effective treatments available: the number needed to be treated to save one patient's life is 2. Decompressive craniectomy is also a standard therapeutic procedure in patients with ICH due to sinus venous thrombosis, herpes encephalitis, or ruptured intracranial aneurysms. In patients with traumatic brain injury DC is a standard therapy to reduce elevated intracranial pressure. The investigators and others assessed whether DC is feasible and beneficial in patients with spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage. The investigators showed in a previous retrospective trial that DC in patients with supratentorial ICH is safe and feasible and may reduce mortality compared to matched controls with best medical treatment alone. The limitations of the feasibility trial are its retrospective design, the small sample size and the inhomogeneity of the patient cohort with respect to the origin of ICH. Furthermore, in the feasibility trial the decision for DC was taken on an individual basis rather than according to a strict protocol, introducing a potential selection bias. Nevertheless, the preliminary results are encouraging. Recently, three human trials, one animal study, one meta-analysis, and one original contribution have been published on this topic. However, no prospective randomized trial has ever assessed whether DC without hematoma evacuation in patients with acute ICH improves outcome. All recent studies showed promising results and all call for the initiation of a randomized controlled trial.
Objective
The primary objective of this randomized controlled trial is to determine whether decompressive surgery and best medical treatment in patients with spontaneous ICH will improve outcome compared to best medical treatment only.
Secondary objectives are to analyze mortality, dependency and quality of life. Safety endpoints are to determine cause of any mortality and the rate of medical and surgical complications after DC compared with best medical treatment alone.
Methods
All patients with a suspected intracerebral hemorrhage will be considered for this trial. Randomization of eligible patients will be performed within 66 hours after ictus in patients with stable clot volume and surgery no later than 6 hours after randomization. Patients randomized to the control group will receive best medical treatment according to international guidelines. Patients randomized to the treatment group will receive best medical treatment and a DC of at least 12cm according to institutional guidelines and a surgical protocol. The primary outcome death and dependency at 6 months will be assessed by a trained person unaware of treatment allocation. Favorable outcome is defined as a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0 to 4, poor outcome as modified Rankin Scale score of 5 or 6.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Decompressive craniectomy and best medical treatment | Experimental | Procedure: Decompressive craniectomy (DC) and best medical treatmentDecompressive craniectomy and best medical treatment |
| Best medical treatment | Active comparator | Procedure: Best medical treatmentBest medical treatment |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Written informed consent of the patient or of patient's next of kin plus consent of an independent physician if patient is unable to consent before randomization
- Acute stroke syndrome due to a spontaneous ICH, defined as the sudden occurrence of bleeding into the parenchyma of the basal ganglia and/or thalamus that may extend into the ventricles and into the cerebral lobes, and into the subarachnoid space, confirmed by clinical history and imaging
- Age: ≥18 to ≤75 years
- Glasgow coma scale (GCS) <14 and >7
- Neurological deficit with a NIHSS score of ≥10 and ≤30
Key exclusion criteria (15 listed)
- ICH due to known or suspected structural abnormality in the brain (e.g., intracranial aneurysm, brain arteriovenous malformation, brain tumor) or brain trauma, or previous stroke thrombolysis
- Cerebellar or brainstem hemorrhage
- Exclusive lobar hemorrhage
- Known advanced dementia or significant pre-stroke disability
- Concomitant medical illness that would interfere with outcome assessment and follow-up
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Decompressive craniectomy (DC) and best medical treatmentDecompressive craniectomy: All patients in the treatment group will receive DC of at least 12 cm according to institutional guidelines and a published surgical protocol. Best medical treatment: Best medical treatment is based on American Heart Association/American Stroke Association (AHA/ASA) and European Stroke Organisation (ESO) as published in the current protocol from 2010 and 2014 respectively. | Procedure or surgery | Decompressive craniectomy and best medical treatment |
| Best medical treatmentBest medical treatment is based on American Heart Association/American Stroke Association (AHA/ASA) and European Stroke Organisation (ESO) as published in the current protocol from 2010 and 2014 respectively. | Procedure or surgery | Best medical treatment |
Primary outcome
Score in modified Rankin Scale (mRS)
Time frame: 6 months
Assessed by telephone interview
5 secondary outcomes
Mortality
Time frame: 7 days, 30 days, 180 days, 12 months
mRS score of 0-3 versus 4-6
Time frame: 30 days, 180 days, 12 months
Categorical shift in mRS score
Time frame: 180 days, 12 months
Quality of life
Time frame: 180 days, 12 months
Death and intracranial hemorrhage
Time frame: intraoperative
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 14 Nov 2024.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41104458Polymeris AA, Lang MF, Hakim A, Butikofer L, Fung C, Beyeler S, Z'Graggen W, Strbian D, Vajkoczy P, Schubert GA, Gruber A, Mielke D, Roelz R, Siepen B, Seiffge DJ, Selim MH, Raabe A, Beck J, Fischer U; SWITCH Study Investigators. Effect of Decompressive Craniectomy According to Location of Deep Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A SWITCH Trial Analysis. Stroke. 2026 Jan;57(1):12-19. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.125.052460. Epub 2025 Oct 17.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38761811Beck J, Fung C, Strbian D, Butikofer L, Z'Graggen WJ, Lang MF, Beyeler S, Gralla J, Ringel F, Schaller K, Plesnila N, Arnold M, Hacke W, Juni P, Mendelow AD, Stapf C, Al-Shahi Salman R, Bressan J, Lerch S, Hakim A, Martinez-Majander N, Piippo-Karjalainen A, Vajkoczy P, Wolf S, Schubert GA, Hollig A, Veldeman M, Roelz R, Gruber A, Rauch P, Mielke D, Rohde V, Kerz T, Uhl E, Thanasi E, Huttner HB, Kallmunzer B, Jaap Kappelle L, Deinsberger W, Roth C, Lemmens R, Leppert J, Sanmillan JL, Coutinho JM, Hackenberg KAM, Reimann G, Mazighi M, Bassetti CLA, Mattle HP, Raabe A, Fischer U; SWITCH study investigators. Decompressive craniectomy plus best medical treatment versus best medical treatment alone for spontaneous severe deep supratentorial intracerebral haemorrhage: a randomised controlled clinical trial. Lancet. 2024 Jun 1;403(10442):2395-2404. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)00702-5. Epub 2024 May 15.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38347736Fischer U, Fung C, Beyeler S, Butikofer L, Z'Graggen W, Ringel F, Gralla J, Schaller K, Plesnila N, Strbian D, Arnold M, Hacke W, Juni P, Mendelow AD, Stapf C, Al-Shahi Salman R, Bressan J, Lerch S, Bassetti CLA, Mattle HP, Raabe A, Beck J. Swiss trial of decompressive craniectomy versus best medical treatment of spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral haemorrhage (SWITCH): an international, multicentre, randomised-controlled, two-arm, assessor-blinded trial. Eur Stroke J. 2024 Sep;9(3):781-788. doi: 10.1177/23969873241231047. Epub 2024 Feb 12.
- Website of the trialLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Cerebral Hemorrhage
RecruitingPhase 3
Stroke and Systemic Embolism Prevention in Adult Participants With Atrial Fibrillation
Atrial Fibrillation (AF)
Recruiting
Middle Meningeal Artery Embolisation in Chronic Subdural Hematoma
Chronic Subdural Hematoma
RecruitingPhase 2
Safety in Adult Participants With Atrial Fibrillation Who Are Treated With Anticoagulation
Atrial Fibrillation (AF)
RecruitingObservational study
Association of Prophylactic Use of Stress Ulcer Drugs and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Acute Anterior Circulation Thrombectomy
Acute Ischemic Stroke
Recruiting
Discontinuation of Antithrombotic Treatment Following Patent Foramen Ovale Closure in Young Patients With Cryptogenic Stroke
Patent Foramen Ovale, Ischemic Stroke
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Urs Fischer, Prof. Dr. med. study director
Dep. of Neurology, Inselspital Bern
Jürgen Beck, Prof. Dr. med. study chair
Dep. of Neurosurgery, Inselspital Bern
32 sites in 8 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Decompressive craniectomy (DC) and best medical treatment and Best medical treatment in people with Cerebral Hemorrhage, run by Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern at 32 sites in 8 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 15 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Nov 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 32 sites in Germany, Switzerland, Spain, France, Netherlands and 3 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Score in modified Rankin Scale (mRS) (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02258919, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Nov 2024.