AzTrials
AzTrials

AnemiaNCT02259166

Enhanced Homestead Food Production Plus+ Program in the Lake Zone, Tanzania

A study testing EHFP+ in people with Anemia and Growth Retardation, run by International Food Policy Research Institute at 1 site in Tanzania.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to assess if the Enhanced Homestead Food Production Plus (EHFP+) Program implemented by HKI in Mwanza, Tanzania, enhances uptake of Micronutrient Powder (MNP) supplementation in children, helps maintaining reduced anemia levels among children after a blanket provision of MNP, and has an… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 6 to 12 monthsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Anemia, Growth Retardation
What is being tested?
EHFP+
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
2,325 participants
Where
1 siteTanzania
Study dates
Jun 2014to Mar 2016
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 6 to 12 months
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • women living in the study area
  • having one child aged 6-12 months of age

Who cannot join

  • children with severe anemia

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Tanzania1 site
  • National Institute for Medical Research

    Mwanza

Other trials in Tanzania

About this study

Official title: Impact of the Evaluation of the Enhanced Homestead Food Production Program in Sengerema, and Ukerewe in the Lake Zone,Tanzania

The purpose of this study is to assess if the Enhanced Homestead Food Production Plus (EHFP+) Program implemented by HKI in Mwanza, Tanzania, enhances uptake of Micronutrient Powder (MNP) supplementation in children, helps maintaining reduced anemia levels among children after a blanket provision of MNP, and has an impact on child growth, infant and young child feeding (IYCF) practices, maternal knowledge related to health, nutrition, WASH and malaria prevention, food security and women's empowerment.

Read the detailed description

Since 1988, Helen Keller International's (HKI) flagship Homestead Food Production (HFP) program in Asia has helped communities establish technically-improved local food production systems by creating gardens yielding micronutrient-rich fruits and vegetables over expanded growing seasons, complemented by the improved rearing of poultry and livestock.

In 2010, HKI introduced an enhanced-HFP (E-HFP) model in Burkina Faso and included a strengthened nutrition education component; the Essential Nutrition Actions (ENA) framework. This E-HFP program was evaluated by IFPRI and yielded some encouraging results. With regards to nutritional outcomes, however, the primary finding was that, while the E-HFP program improved hemoglobin concentration-an indicator of iron status-the evaluation failed to note a significant impact of the program on improving children's growth. The primary explanation for the absence of a measurable improvement in children's growth was the lack of complementary health interventions that aim to specifically reduce children's disease burden, which, along with the lack of adequate food and care, is an underlying cause of undernutriton (UNICEF 1990).

Building on lessons learned from the Burkina Faso E-HFP program and a 2011 Tanzania HFP program, a new model, the Enhanced Homestead Food Production Plus (E-HFP+), was developed for Tanzania to improve the nutritional status of infants and young children. The new model strengthens the Behavior Change Communication (BCC) on malaria prevention, WASH, and gender components and enhances links with the health sector. The model will also test two new concepts:

  1. to assess if the E-HFP+ program has the potential to maintain adequate levels of hemoglobin concentrations by increasing iron-rich food consumption and malaria prevention good practices.
  2. to assess the effectiveness on anemia of using an existing agriculture-based platform to promote uptake and utilization of MNP.

The model involves both a set of production and nutrition interventions targeted to mothers and the provision of a curative treatment for moderate to severe anemia (Micronutrient Powder).

The main objective of the impact evaluation of the E-HFP+ program is therefore to assess whether the program:

  • Maintains reduced anemia levels among pre-school aged children after a blanket provision of Micronutrient Powder (MNP)
  • Improves child growth (measured by HAZ and WHZ)
  • Improves infant and young child feeding (IYCF) practices and maternal knowledge on health and nutrition
  • Is an appropriate delivery platform to enhance uptake and utilization of MNP supplementation in children
Being tested
EHFP+
Medical subject headings
Anemia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • EHFP+Other

    Enhanced-homestead food production program including home gardening and poultry rearing + WASH interventions + SBCC around the essential nutrition actions and WASH/malaria prevention with a gender component.

Study groups in NCT02259166
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
EHFP+ExperimentalGroup receiving the intervention EHFP+, in addition to MNPs distribution for 2 months and malaria diagnosis and treatment for children enrolled, at baseline and after 12 months
Receives: Other: EHFP+
ControlNo interventionMNPs distribution for 2 months and malaria diagnosis and treatment for children enrolled, at baseline and after 12 months

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Anemia (g/dl and %)

    Change in prevalence of anemia and hemoglobin concentration will be measured over the course of the program period.(at baseline, during follow-up after 3, 6 and 12 months and after 18 months at endline)

    Measured: Measurements will be made for children aged 6 to 11 months at baseline and up to 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and 18 months (at endline), when the children are between the ages of 24 and 30 months

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. Growth (Z-score and %)

    Change in height-for-age Z-scores, weight-for-age Z-scores and weight-for-height Z-scores will be measured as well as the change in the prevalence of stunting (HAZ<-2), underweight (WAZ<-2) and wasting (WHZ<-2) over the course of the program period

    Measured: Measurements will be made for children between the ages of 6 and 11 months of age at baseline and 18 months later, at endline, when the children are between the ages of 24 and 30 months

  2. Biochemical markers

    Change in plasmatic concentration of iron biomarkers (transferring receptors and ferritin; TfR and F), in concentration of vitamin A biomarkers (retinolbindingprotein; RBP) and inflammatory proteins (C-reactiveprotein and alpha-1 acidglycoprotein; CRP and AGP)

    Measured: Baseline (June 2014), Follow-up1 (up to 3 months) and after 18 months at Endline

  3. Dietary diversity (%)

    Measured with a questionnaire using a qualitative 24h recall. Unit: Number of food group consumed and percentage of children having consumed 4 groups (upon 7) the previous day

    Measured: Baseline (2014) and after 18 months at Endline

  4. Food security (%)

    Measured with a questionnaire to calculate the HFIAS score. Unit: percentage of household

    Measured: Baseline (2014) and after 18 months at Endline (2016)

  5. Women's empowerment (%)

    Measured by questionnaire, using a decision-making module and a domestic violence module. Percentage of women over a calculated score.

    Measured: Baseline (2014) and after 18 months at Endline (2016)

  6. Maternal health and nutrition/WASH/malaria-related knowledge (%)

    Using questionnaire on knowledge. Percentage of women giving adequate answer.

    Measured: Baseline (2014) and after 18 months at Endline (2016)

  7. IYCF/WASH/malaria practices (%)

    Using questionnaire on practices. Percentage of women with adequate practices.

    Measured: Baseline (2014) and after 18 months at Endline (2016)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 Oct 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study startJun 2014
  3. Primary completionMar 2016
  4. Study completionMar 2016

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
2,325 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02259166
Sponsor's protocol ID
EHFP+ TZ
Status last verified
Sep 2015
First submitted
5 Sep 2014
Last updated
19 Sep 2016
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing EHFP+ in people with Anemia and Growth Retardation, run by International Food Policy Research Institute at 1 site in Tanzania.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Sep 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Tanzania. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Anemia (g/dl and %) (time frame: Measurements will be made for children aged 6 to 11 months at baseline and up to 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and 18 months (at endline), when the children are between the ages of 24 and 30 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Sep 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in