Gynecological InfectionEarly Phase 1NCT02259309
Immune Modulation by Misoprostol
A Early Phase 1 study testing Misoprostol - buccal and Misoprostol - vaginal in people with Gynecological Infection, run by Vanderbilt University at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The present study is designed to address the null hypothesis that there is no difference in the local and systemic immunomodulatory effects of buccally or vaginally administered misoprostol in healthy, reproductive-age women. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 45 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Gynecological Infection
- What is being tested?
- Misoprostol - buccal and Misoprostol - vaginal
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 15 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Nov 2014to Nov 2015
- Phase
- Early Phase 1
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 45 years
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Healthy women 18-45 years of age
- Negative result of urine pregnancy test at screening and prior to each administration of study drug
- Normal, regularly occurring menses (being 25-35 day cycles)
Who cannot join
- Use of hormonal contraception (current or past 3 months)
- Use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) or aspirin within two weeks prior to enrollment or planned use of these medications during the study period
- Allergy to prostaglandins
- Previous cervical cancer
- Partial or complete cervical excision
- Previous hysterectomy
Show all 12Show fewer
- Immunosuppression: either pharmacological or due to comorbidities
- Diabetes mellitus
- Auto-immune disease
- History of lymphoma or leukemia
- Sexually transmitted infection (by self-report) over previous 1 year
- Bacterial Vaginosis or Candidiasis (current or past 3 months)
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Nashville, Tennessee, 37232
About this study
The present study is designed to address the null hypothesis that there is no difference in the local and systemic immunomodulatory effects of buccally or vaginally administered misoprostol in healthy, reproductive-age women.
- Conditions
- Gynecological Infection
- Being tested
- Misoprostol - buccal, Misoprostol - vaginal
- Keywords
- misoprostol, mucosal, cervical, immune, buccal, vaginal
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Misoprostol - buccalDrug
Also called Cytotec
buccal administration
Misoprostol - vaginalDrug
Also called Cytotec
vaginal administration
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Misoprostol administration - buccal then vaginal | Experimental | Vaginal or buccal administration Receives: Drug: Misoprostol - buccal; Drug: Misoprostol - vaginal |
| Misoprostol administration - vaginal then buccal | Experimental | Vaginal or buccal administration Receives: Drug: Misoprostol - buccal; Drug: Misoprostol - vaginal |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Comparison of misoprostol drug levels in patients after vaginal and buccal administration
Peripheral blood collected at Days 0, 1, 28, and 29
Measured: Peripheral blood collected at Days 0, 1, 28, and 29
Comparison of cytokine and chemokine levels in patients after vaginal and buccal administration
Peripheral blood collected at Days 0, 1, 28, and 29
Measured: Peripheral blood collected at Days 0, 1, 28, and 29
Determination of immune cell activation state after vaginal and buccal administration
Peripheral blood collected at Days 0, 1, 28, and 29
Measured: Peripheral blood collected at Days 0, 1, 28, and 29
Comparison of misoprostol drug levels in patients after vaginal and buccal administration
Cervicovaginal lavage at Days 0, 1, 28, and 29
Measured: Cervicovaginal lavage at Days 0, 1, 28, and 29
Comparison of cytokine and chemokine levels in patients after vaginal and buccal administration
Cervicovaginal lavage at Days 0, 1, 28, and 29
Measured: Cervicovaginal lavage at Days 0, 1, 28, and 29
Determination of immune cell activation state after vaginal and buccal administration
Cervical cytobrush at Days 0, 1, 28, and 29
Measured: Cervical cytobrush at Days 0, 1, 28, and 29
Secondary outcomes (1)
Sequencing of 16S rRNA gene for microbial ecology studies after vaginal and buccal administration
Vaginal swab at Days 0, 1, 28, and 29
Measured: Vaginal swab at Days 0, 1, 28, and 29
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Oct 2014 (estimated)
- Study startNov 2014
- Primary completionJul 2015
- Study completionNov 2015
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (18)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Gynecological InfectionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Early Phase 1
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 15 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Vanderbilt University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Gynuity Health Projects
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, David Aronoff, Vanderbilt University
- Investigators
- David M. Aronoff, MD, Principal investigator, Vanderbilt University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02259309
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 140667
- Status last verified
- Jan 2016
- First submitted
- 22 Sep 2014
- Last updated
- 14 Jan 2016
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Moran M, Mozes MF, Maddux MS, Veremis S, Bartkus C, Ketel B, Pollak R, Wallemark C, Jonasson O. Prevention of acute graft rejection by the prostaglandin E1 analogue misoprostol in renal-transplant recipients treated with cyclosporine and prednisone. N Engl J Med. 1990 Apr 26;322(17):1183-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199004263221703.
PubMed 2109195Pouteil-Noble C, Chapuis F, Berra N, Hadj-Aissa A, Lacavalerie B, Lefrancois N, Martin X, Touraine JL. Misoprostol in renal transplant recipients: a prospective, randomized, controlled study on the prevention of acute rejection episodes and cyclosporin A nephrotoxicity. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1994;9(5):552-5. doi: 10.1093/ndt/9.5.552.
PubMed 8090337Zieman M, Fong SK, Benowitz NL, Banskter D, Darney PD. Absorption kinetics of misoprostol with oral or vaginal administration. Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Jul;90(1):88-92. doi: 10.1016/S0029-7844(97)00111-7.
PubMed 9207820Waiser J, Bohler T, Stoll J, Schumann B, Budde K, Neumayer HH. The immunosuppressive potential of misoprostol--efficacy and variability. Clin Immunol. 2003 Dec;109(3):288-94. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2003.08.009.
PubMed 14697743Middleton T, Schaff E, Fielding SL, Scahill M, Shannon C, Westheimer E, Wilkinson T, Winikoff B. Randomized trial of mifepristone and buccal or vaginal misoprostol for abortion through 56 days of last menstrual period. Contraception. 2005 Nov;72(5):328-32. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2005.05.017. Epub 2005 Aug 9.
PubMed 16246656Tang OS, Ho PC. The pharmacokinetics and different regimens of misoprostol in early first-trimester medical abortion. Contraception. 2006 Jul;74(1):26-30. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2006.03.005. Epub 2006 Apr 27.
PubMed 16781256el-Refaey H, Rajasekar D, Abdalla M, Calder L, Templeton A. Induction of abortion with mifepristone (RU 486) and oral or vaginal misoprostol. N Engl J Med. 1995 Apr 13;332(15):983-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199504133321502.
PubMed 7885426Ho PC, Ngai SW, Liu KL, Wong GC, Lee SW. Vaginal misoprostol compared with oral misoprostol in termination of second-trimester pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Nov;90(5):735-8. doi: 10.1016/S0029-7844(97)00419-5.
PubMed 9351755Silverstein FE, Graham DY, Senior JR, Davies HW, Struthers BJ, Bittman RM, Geis GS. Misoprostol reduces serious gastrointestinal complications in patients with rheumatoid arthritis receiving nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 1995 Aug 15;123(4):241-9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-123-4-199508150-00001.
PubMed 7611589Herting RL, Clay GA. Overview of clinical safety with misoprostol. Dig Dis Sci. 1985 Nov;30(11 Suppl):185S-193S. doi: 10.1007/BF01309407.
PubMed 3932053Wildeman RA. Focus on misoprostol: review of worldwide safety data. Clin Invest Med. 1987 May;10(3):243-5.
PubMed 3113801Rostom A, Dube C, Wells G, Tugwell P, Welch V, Jolicoeur E, McGowan J. Prevention of NSAID-induced gastroduodenal ulcers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002;(4):CD002296. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002296.
PubMed 12519573Chong E, Tsereteli T, Nguyen NN, Winikoff B. A randomized controlled trial of different buccal misoprostol doses in mifepristone medical abortion. Contraception. 2012 Sep;86(3):251-6. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2011.12.012. Epub 2012 Feb 2.
PubMed 22305917Raymond EG, Shannon C, Weaver MA, Winikoff B. First-trimester medical abortion with mifepristone 200 mg and misoprostol: a systematic review. Contraception. 2013 Jan;87(1):26-37. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.06.011. Epub 2012 Aug 13.
PubMed 22898359Kotsonis FN, Dodd DC, Regnier B, Kohn FE. Preclinical toxicology profile of misoprostol. Dig Dis Sci. 1985 Nov;30(11 Suppl):142S-146S. doi: 10.1007/BF01309401.
PubMed 3932047
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 14 Jan 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Immune Modulation by Misoprostol
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02259309
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 140667
- Conditions
- Gynecological Infection
- Keywords
- misoprostol, mucosal, cervical, immune, buccal, vaginal
- Phase
- Early Phase 1
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 15 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Vanderbilt UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Gynuity Health Projects
- Study start
- Nov 2014
- Primary completion
- Jul 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- Nov 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 8 Oct 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The present study is designed to address the null hypothesis that there is no difference in the local and systemic immunomodulatory effects of buccally or vaginally administered misoprostol in healthy, reproductive-age women.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Misoprostol administration - buccal then vaginal | Experimental | Drug: Misoprostol - buccal, Drug: Misoprostol - vaginalVaginal or buccal administration |
| Misoprostol administration - vaginal then buccal | Experimental | Drug: Misoprostol - buccal, Drug: Misoprostol - vaginalVaginal or buccal administration |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 45 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Healthy women 18-45 years of age
- Negative result of urine pregnancy test at screening and prior to each administration of study drug
- Normal, regularly occurring menses (being 25-35 day cycles)
Key exclusion criteria (12 listed)
- Use of hormonal contraception (current or past 3 months)
- Use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) or aspirin within two weeks prior to enrollment or planned use of these medications during the study period
- Allergy to prostaglandins
- Previous cervical cancer
- Partial or complete cervical excision
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Misoprostol - buccalAlso: Cytotecbuccal administration | Drug | Misoprostol administration - buccal then vaginal, Misoprostol administration - vaginal then buccal |
| Misoprostol - vaginalAlso: Cytotecvaginal administration | Drug | Misoprostol administration - buccal then vaginal, Misoprostol administration - vaginal then buccal |
Primary outcome
Comparison of misoprostol drug levels in patients after vaginal and buccal administration
Time frame: Peripheral blood collected at Days 0, 1, 28, and 29
Peripheral blood collected at Days 0, 1, 28, and 29
Comparison of cytokine and chemokine levels in patients after vaginal and buccal administration
Time frame: Peripheral blood collected at Days 0, 1, 28, and 29
Peripheral blood collected at Days 0, 1, 28, and 29
Determination of immune cell activation state after vaginal and buccal administration
Time frame: Peripheral blood collected at Days 0, 1, 28, and 29
Peripheral blood collected at Days 0, 1, 28, and 29
Comparison of misoprostol drug levels in patients after vaginal and buccal administration
Time frame: Cervicovaginal lavage at Days 0, 1, 28, and 29
Cervicovaginal lavage at Days 0, 1, 28, and 29
Comparison of cytokine and chemokine levels in patients after vaginal and buccal administration
Time frame: Cervicovaginal lavage at Days 0, 1, 28, and 29
Cervicovaginal lavage at Days 0, 1, 28, and 29
Determination of immune cell activation state after vaginal and buccal administration
Time frame: Cervical cytobrush at Days 0, 1, 28, and 29
Cervical cytobrush at Days 0, 1, 28, and 29
1 secondary outcome
Sequencing of 16S rRNA gene for microbial ecology studies after vaginal and buccal administration
Time frame: Vaginal swab at Days 0, 1, 28, and 29
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 14 Jan 2016.
- Background: PubMed 2109195Moran M, Mozes MF, Maddux MS, Veremis S, Bartkus C, Ketel B, Pollak R, Wallemark C, Jonasson O. Prevention of acute graft rejection by the prostaglandin E1 analogue misoprostol in renal-transplant recipients treated with cyclosporine and prednisone. N Engl J Med. 1990 Apr 26;322(17):1183-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199004263221703.
- Background: PubMed 8090337Pouteil-Noble C, Chapuis F, Berra N, Hadj-Aissa A, Lacavalerie B, Lefrancois N, Martin X, Touraine JL. Misoprostol in renal transplant recipients: a prospective, randomized, controlled study on the prevention of acute rejection episodes and cyclosporin A nephrotoxicity. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1994;9(5):552-5. doi: 10.1093/ndt/9.5.552.
- Background: PubMed 9207820Zieman M, Fong SK, Benowitz NL, Banskter D, Darney PD. Absorption kinetics of misoprostol with oral or vaginal administration. Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Jul;90(1):88-92. doi: 10.1016/S0029-7844(97)00111-7.
- Background: PubMed 14697743Waiser J, Bohler T, Stoll J, Schumann B, Budde K, Neumayer HH. The immunosuppressive potential of misoprostol--efficacy and variability. Clin Immunol. 2003 Dec;109(3):288-94. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2003.08.009.
- Background: PubMed 16246656Middleton T, Schaff E, Fielding SL, Scahill M, Shannon C, Westheimer E, Wilkinson T, Winikoff B. Randomized trial of mifepristone and buccal or vaginal misoprostol for abortion through 56 days of last menstrual period. Contraception. 2005 Nov;72(5):328-32. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2005.05.017. Epub 2005 Aug 9.
- Background: PubMed 16781256Tang OS, Ho PC. The pharmacokinetics and different regimens of misoprostol in early first-trimester medical abortion. Contraception. 2006 Jul;74(1):26-30. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2006.03.005. Epub 2006 Apr 27.
- Background: PubMed 7885426el-Refaey H, Rajasekar D, Abdalla M, Calder L, Templeton A. Induction of abortion with mifepristone (RU 486) and oral or vaginal misoprostol. N Engl J Med. 1995 Apr 13;332(15):983-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199504133321502.
- Background: PubMed 9351755Ho PC, Ngai SW, Liu KL, Wong GC, Lee SW. Vaginal misoprostol compared with oral misoprostol in termination of second-trimester pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Nov;90(5):735-8. doi: 10.1016/S0029-7844(97)00419-5.
- Background: PubMed 7611589Silverstein FE, Graham DY, Senior JR, Davies HW, Struthers BJ, Bittman RM, Geis GS. Misoprostol reduces serious gastrointestinal complications in patients with rheumatoid arthritis receiving nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 1995 Aug 15;123(4):241-9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-123-4-199508150-00001.
- Background: PubMed 3932053Herting RL, Clay GA. Overview of clinical safety with misoprostol. Dig Dis Sci. 1985 Nov;30(11 Suppl):185S-193S. doi: 10.1007/BF01309407.
- Background: PubMed 3113801Wildeman RA. Focus on misoprostol: review of worldwide safety data. Clin Invest Med. 1987 May;10(3):243-5.
- Background: PubMed 12519573Rostom A, Dube C, Wells G, Tugwell P, Welch V, Jolicoeur E, McGowan J. Prevention of NSAID-induced gastroduodenal ulcers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002;(4):CD002296. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002296.
Related trials for Gynecological Infection
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Analysis on the Health of Newborns in Three Hospitals, 2008-2024
Neonatal Morbidity and Mortality, Intrauterine Growth Disorders (IUGR and Macrosomia)
RecruitingPhase 2
Phase II Study of Dysplasix™ Intravaginal Suppositories in Patients Patients With High-Risk HPV and Mild Cervical Cytologic Abnormalities
High-risk HPV (Any Strain), LSIL, Low Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
Phase 3 Maternal Safety & Immunogenicity Trial of MVA-BN® in DRC
Neonate, Maternal Transmission
Recruiting
Determining the Frequency of Occurrence and Defining the Most Appropriate Screening Test for Anal Intraepithelial Neoplasia (AIN) in Patients With Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Related Gynecological Diseases.
HPV-Related Carcinoma, HPV Infection
RecruitingPhase 4
A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Study of the Probiotics as Adjuvant Treatment for Bacterial Vaginosis
Bacterial Vaginosis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
David M. Aronoff, MD principal investigator
Vanderbilt University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Early Phase 1 study testing Misoprostol - buccal and Misoprostol - vaginal in people with Gynecological Infection, run by Vanderbilt University at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Jan 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Early Phase 1 (sometimes called Phase 0) studies give a very small amount of a treatment to a few people, mainly to see how the body handles it.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Comparison of misoprostol drug levels in patients after vaginal and buccal administration (time frame: Peripheral blood collected at Days 0, 1, 28, and 29). The study lists 6 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02259309, which also lists 18 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Jan 2016.