Tissue AdhesionsPhase 1LABS-1NCT02260115
A Randomized Multi-centre Study to Assess the Safety and Manageability of a Laparoscopic Adhesion Barrier in Women Undergoing Gynecologic Laparoscopic Surgery Followed by Second Look Laparoscopy
A Phase 1 study testing LABS™ in people with Tissue Adhesions, run by Actamax Surgical Materials LLC at 4 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to obtain data on the safety and manageability of applying LABS™ to the uterus and other areas of surgical trauma in the pelvis and abdomen following laparoscopic gynaecologic surgery. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 46 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Tissue Adhesions
- What is being tested?
- LABS™
- Type of treatment
- Medical device, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 78 participants
- Where
- 4 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- Nov 2013to Jul 2016
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 46 years
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
PREOPERATIVE INCLUSION
Preoperatively the patient must:
- understand and be able to follow the requirements of the protocol including signing and dating an Ethics Committee approved Informed Consent prior to undergoing any protocol related procedures
- be a premenopausal female who is > 18 and < 46 years old
- be thought to have gynaecologic pathology requiring laparoscopic surgery - including uterine fibroids (including those with only anterior fibroid or repeat myomectomy/previous uterine artery embolization for fibroid), adhesions, and/or endometriosis with or without associated pathology such as ovarian cysts
- wish to retain her fertility
- and thus be considered to clinically benefit from a second-look laparoscopic procedure;
- have a willingness to undergo a second-look surgical procedure if clinically indicated
- have a negative pregnancy test within 5 days of surgery
- agree to avoid pregnancy using adequate forms of contraception through the time of performance of second-look laparoscopy (oral contraceptive pill, condom, no sexual intercourse), and if the patient is undergoing myomectomy that she is aware that it is good advice to avoid pregnancy for a 12 week period to allow healing of the uterine scar before becoming pregnant
- be in good health including an ASA (American Society of Anaesthesiologists) score of 2 or less
- following physical and medical assessment have no clinically significant or relevant abnormalities.
PREOPERATIVE EXCLUSION
Preoperatively a patient must not:
- be unable to give their own written informed consent,
- have completed her family planning with no desire to maintain fertility,
- be considered to have no potential clinical benefit from a second look laparoscopy,
- be breastfeeding,
- be within 6 weeks post-partum
- have received or is expected to receive another anti-adhesive treatment within 30 days prior to enrolment or during enrolment up to adhesion evaluation at second look laparoscopy,
- be currently enrolled in another clinical study or has been in another study within the last 30 days,
- have received or is expected to receive any other investigational product or technique within 30 days prior to or during enrolment,
- have had cancer within 5 years of the initial surgery with the exception of basal cell carcinoma,
- have known allergy to dextran, PEG, or FD\&C Blue #1,
- be scheduled to undergo concomitant non-gynaecological surgery,
- be currently pregnant (including ectopic pregnancy),
- have received GNRH agonist/antagonist, Depo Provera, danocrine, ulipristal acetate or similar treatment (except oral contraceptives - and including progesterone only) in the 4 weeks prior to study,
- on pre-operative imaging have
- Largest fibroid < 2 cms
- Or largest fibroid > 10 cms diameter intramural
- Or more than 5 large fibroids (large = >8 cms diameter)
- And/or adenomyoma >10cm identified
- have a history where it is expected that complete adhesiolysis will not be possible,
- preoperatively have clinically significant abnormal blood results including:
- SGOT, SGPT and/or bilirubin > 20% above the upper range of normal and/or
- BUN and creatinine > 30% above the upper range of normal,
- have clinically relevant hemochromatosis, hepatic, renal, autoimmune, lymphatic, haematological or coagulation disorders,
- have insulin dependent diabetes mellitus,
- be receiving concurrent systemic corticosteroids, antineoplastic agents and/or radiation therapy,
- have had previous radiation therapy,
- have active pelvic or abdominal infection, or other active infection with fever >38°C.
INTRAOPERATIVE INCLUSION
During surgery the patient must have:
- treatment of uterine fibroids, endometriosis, and or adhesions, with or without associated pathology such as ovarian cysts, and meets all intraoperative inclusion/exclusion criteria prior to randomisation, including that a SLL is clinically indicated
Additionally for the myomectomy sub study, during surgery it must be confirmed that:
- the patient underwent a laparoscopic myomectomy with at least (1) posterior uterine serosal incision of > 3 cm in length
- that the major portion of the procedure (in the opinion of the surgeon) was related to myomectomy
- that the patient meets all intraoperative inclusion/exclusion criteria prior to randomisation. and
- at the completion of the procedure, prior to randomisation, the surgeon continues to believe that the patient will clinically benefit from second- look laparoscopy.
INTRAOPERATIVE EXCLUSION
Intraoperatively a patient must not:
- have cancer detected at surgery,
- be pregnant, including ectopic pregnancy,
- have a non-gynaecological surgical procedure or entry into the bowel, bladder, or ureter,
- have a hysterectomy or other gynaecological procedure that would render the patient unable to conceive
- receive the administration of a product that will interfere with the application of LABS™ Adhesion Barrier Material,
- receive the use of an approved or unapproved product or strategy for the purpose of preventing adhesion development,
- receive fibrin glue, surgical sealant, or other haemostatic agent,
- undergo an open procedure
- undergo a posterior colpotomy,
- undergo insufflation with a gas other than CO2,
- undergo Laprolift or similar device for elevation of the abdominal wall, as an alternative to CO2 insufflation,
- undergo abdominal cavity humidification or oxygenation,
- undergo robotic surgery,
- receive irrigants containing, glucocorticoids, antihistamines, heparin or antiseptic additives.
- have a postoperative drain
- does not have complete lysis of any adhesions to the posterior uterus
- has deep infiltrating endometriosis that is not treated during surgery
- patient had ovarian cysts with no other pathology
- be considered to have no clinical indication for a SLL
For the myomectomy sub study the patient:
- does not undergo laparoscopic myomectomy with at least (1) posterior uterine serosal incision of > 3 cm in length,
- has only pedunculated fibroids removed from the posterior aspect of the uterus
- has adenomyoma alone without fibroids
- has therapeutic hysteroscopy with treatment of congenital malformation, myomectomy or treatment of Asherman's syndrome
- excepting diagnostic hysteroscopy or polypectomy with lactated Ringer's solution (LRS) undertaken prior to laparoscopy and all fluid removed prior to laparoscopic filming.
Trial locations and contacts
4 sites in 2 countries.
4 sites in 2 countries
Germany3 sites
Johanna Etienne Krankenhaus
Neuss
Pius-Hosptial, European Medical School Oldenburg-Groningen, Carl von Ossietzky University
Oldenburg
University of Tubingen Women's Hosptial
Tübingen
About this study
Official title: A Randomized, Controlled, Subject and Reviewer-Blinded, Multi-Centre Study To Assess The Safety and Manageability Of LABS™ In Women Undergoing Gynaecologic Laparoscopic Surgery Followed By Second Look Laparoscopy
The purpose of this study is to obtain data on the safety and manageability of applying LABS™ to the uterus and other areas of surgical trauma in the pelvis and abdomen following laparoscopic gynaecologic surgery. In addition, performance data following a clinical indicated second look laparoscopy will be collected for the purpose of determining sample size predictions for future trials.
Read the detailed description
Women undergoing laparoscopic uterine myomectomy, adhesiolysis, treatment of endometriosis or ovarian cystectomy with associated adhesions and/or endometriosis, and planned, clinically indicated second look laparoscopy within 4-12 weeks will be enrolled into one of two sub studies in which the major component of the surgery (as determined by the surgeon) was due to:
- Myomectomy Or
- Other Gynaecology Pathology (repeat myomectomy, adhesiolysis, and/or treatment of endometriosis, ovarian cystectomy with associated adhesions or endometriotic pathology, removal of adenomyoma without myomectomy.
The myomectomy sub study will include two arms:
- Pure Myomectomy -myomectomy with no endometriosis and no adhesions/few filmy uterine adhesions - blunt dissection only
- Hybrid Myomectomy - myomectomy with (+/-) adhesions and/or (+/-) endometriosis and/or (+/-) adenomyomectomy Patients in each sub study (1 or 2) and each arm of the myomectomy study (a or b) will be randomized to receive LABS™ following their laparoscopic surgery or current standard of care: surgery only control. All patients will be blinded to their treatment status until study completion.
Sub study and sub-group allocation as well as randomisation will occur once the initial laparoscopy is completed but before removal of the laparoscope. Myomectomy patients randomized to receive LABS™ will then have the device sprayed to the entire surface of the uterus and other areas of surgical trauma. In all treated patients all sites of surgical trauma should be completely covered with LABS™ allowing a sprayed margin of at least 3 cm around the operated or traumatised site.
Patients receiving LABS™ will be compared to patients who have had the current standard of care: surgery alone. In addition to an overall comparison, they will be compared to patients in the same sub study (1 or 2) and same arm of the myomectomy study (1a or 1b).
The first two patients entered by each operating surgeon will be allocated to LABS™ and assessed for the application of LABS™. They will not be counted as fully evaluable randomized patients. These patients will be sequentially assigned and evaluated. With confirmatory evaluation of and application of LABS™ on the first patient, the surgeon will be advised to assign the second. With the same confirmatory evaluation on the second patient and both patients discharged from hospital the surgeon will be permitted to proceed with the study and randomise patients.
Both the initial laparoscopic procedure and the clinically indicated second look laparoscopy will be video recorded to allow for a blinded evaluation of LABS™ application and a separate blinded evaluation of adhesions and other pathology in all patients - treated and controls. This evaluation will be cross checked with the operating surgeon's own evaluations and reconciled according to a specified protocol.
Where, during initial surgery, a second look laparoscopy is no longer considered clinically indicated but the surgeon randomizes the patient, they will be followed for safety evaluations only.
- Conditions
- Tissue Adhesions
- Being tested
- LABS™, Surgical Control
- Medical subject headings
- Tissue Adhesions
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
LABS™Device
hydrogel sprayed laparoscopically over all pelvic areas of surgical trauma
Surgical ControlProcedure or surgery
Surgery only
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| LABS™ | Experimental | hydrogel sprayed laparoscopically over all pelvic areas of surgical trauma Receives: Device: LABS™ |
| Surgical Control | Sham comparator | Laproscopic Surgery Only Receives: Procedure: Surgical Control |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Incidence of adverse events, abnormal changes in vital signs and/or clinical laboratory measures
Measured: Between baseline initial surgery and second look laparoscopy (4-12 weeks)
Secondary outcomes (1)
Surgeon satisfaction with the device and it's application
Measured: During baseline initial surgery
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 Oct 2014 (estimated)
- Study startNov 2013
- Primary completionJun 2014
- Study completionJul 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Tissue AdhesionsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 78 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Actamax Surgical Materials LLC
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Rudy DeWilde, MD, ScD, PhD, Principal investigator, Professor and Head Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Gynecology Oncology, Pius-HospitalSara Y Brucker, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Deputy Head of Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Tubingen Women's HospitalMatthias Korell, MD, Principal investigator, Head Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Johanna Etienne-KrankenhausGeorge A Pistofidis, MD, Principal investigator, Director Department of Gynaecological Surgery Lefkos, Stavros HospitalGeoffery H Trew, M.B.B.S, Study director, Consultant in Reproductive Medicine and Surgery, Hammersmith Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02260115
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ABS-01EU-2013
- Other IDs
- 95.10 - 5660 - 7811
- Acronym
- LABS-1
- Status last verified
- Feb 2018
- First submitted
- 1 Oct 2014
- Last updated
- 23 Feb 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Feb 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized, Controlled, Subject and Reviewer-Blinded, Multi-Centre Study To Assess The Safety and Manageability Of LABS™ In Women Undergoing Gynaecologic Laparoscopic Surgery Followed By Second Look Laparoscopy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02260115
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- LABS-1 / ABS-01EU-2013
- Conditions
- Tissue Adhesions
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 78 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Actamax Surgical Materials LLCIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Nov 2013 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Jun 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jul 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 9 Oct 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to obtain data on the safety and manageability of applying LABS™ to the uterus and other areas of surgical trauma in the pelvis and abdomen following laparoscopic gynaecologic surgery. In addition, performance data following a clinical indicated second look laparoscopy will be collected for the purpose of determining sample size predictions for future trials.
Detailed description
Women undergoing laparoscopic uterine myomectomy, adhesiolysis, treatment of endometriosis or ovarian cystectomy with associated adhesions and/or endometriosis, and planned, clinically indicated second look laparoscopy within 4-12 weeks will be enrolled into one of two sub studies in which the major component of the surgery (as determined by the surgeon) was due to:
- Myomectomy Or
- Other Gynaecology Pathology (repeat myomectomy, adhesiolysis, and/or treatment of endometriosis, ovarian cystectomy with associated adhesions or endometriotic pathology, removal of adenomyoma without myomectomy.
The myomectomy sub study will include two arms:
- Pure Myomectomy -myomectomy with no endometriosis and no adhesions/few filmy uterine adhesions - blunt dissection only
- Hybrid Myomectomy - myomectomy with (+/-) adhesions and/or (+/-) endometriosis and/or (+/-) adenomyomectomy Patients in each sub study (1 or 2) and each arm of the myomectomy study (a or b) will be randomized to receive LABS™ following their laparoscopic surgery or current standard of care: surgery only control. All patients will be blinded to their treatment status until study completion.
Sub study and sub-group allocation as well as randomisation will occur once the initial laparoscopy is completed but before removal of the laparoscope. Myomectomy patients randomized to receive LABS™ will then have the device sprayed to the entire surface of the uterus and other areas of surgical trauma. In all treated patients all sites of surgical trauma should be completely covered with LABS™ allowing a sprayed margin of at least 3 cm around the operated or traumatised site.
Patients receiving LABS™ will be compared to patients who have had the current standard of care: surgery alone. In addition to an overall comparison, they will be compared to patients in the same sub study (1 or 2) and same arm of the myomectomy study (1a or 1b).
The first two patients entered by each operating surgeon will be allocated to LABS™ and assessed for the application of LABS™. They will not be counted as fully evaluable randomized patients. These patients will be sequentially assigned and evaluated. With confirmatory evaluation of and application of LABS™ on the first patient, the surgeon will be advised to assign the second. With the same confirmatory evaluation on the second patient and both patients discharged from hospital the surgeon will be permitted to proceed with the study and randomise patients.
Both the initial laparoscopic procedure and the clinically indicated second look laparoscopy will be video recorded to allow for a blinded evaluation of LABS™ application and a separate blinded evaluation of adhesions and other pathology in all patients - treated and controls. This evaluation will be cross checked with the operating surgeon's own evaluations and reconciled according to a specified protocol.
Where, during initial surgery, a second look laparoscopy is no longer considered clinically indicated but the surgeon randomizes the patient, they will be followed for safety evaluations only.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| LABS™ | Experimental | Device: LABS™hydrogel sprayed laparoscopically over all pelvic areas of surgical trauma |
| Surgical Control | Sham comparator | Procedure: Surgical ControlLaproscopic Surgery Only |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 46 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| LABS™hydrogel sprayed laparoscopically over all pelvic areas of surgical trauma | Device | LABS™ |
| Surgical ControlSurgery only | Procedure or surgery | Surgical Control |
Primary outcome
Incidence of adverse events, abnormal changes in vital signs and/or clinical laboratory measures
Time frame: Between baseline initial surgery and second look laparoscopy (4-12 weeks)
1 secondary outcome
Surgeon satisfaction with the device and it's application
Time frame: During baseline initial surgery
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Feb 2018.
Related trials for Tissue Adhesions
RecruitingObservational study
Comparison of Operative Hysteroscopy and Vacuum Aspiration for Terminating First-trimester Pregnancy With Intrauterine Adhesions
Pregnancy Complicated With Intrauterine Adhesion
Recruiting
Ultrasound-Guided Repeated Saline Injections to Prevent and Treat Tendon Adhesions After Hand Tendon Repair
Tendon Adhesion, Zone II Flexor Tendon Injury
RecruitingObservational study
3D MRE-Based Evaluation of Vestibular Schwannoma Mechanical Properties and Histological Features
Vestibular Schwannoma
Recruiting
A Single-Center Clinical Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of a Suture-Free Ophthalmic Hydrogel for Ocular Surface Tissue Adhesion
Cornea Disease
Active, not recruiting
Poly-4-Hydroxybutyrate Scaffold in Rhytidectomy
Tissue Adhesion
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Rudy DeWilde, MD, ScD, PhD principal investigator
Professor and Head Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Gynecology Oncology, Pius-Hospital
Sara Y Brucker, MD, PhD principal investigator
Deputy Head of Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Tubingen Women's Hospital
Matthias Korell, MD principal investigator
Head Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Johanna Etienne-Krankenhaus
4 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1 study testing LABS™ in people with Tissue Adhesions, run by Actamax Surgical Materials LLC at 4 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Feb 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 4 sites in Germany, Greece. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Incidence of adverse events, abnormal changes in vital signs and/or clinical laboratory measures (time frame: Between baseline initial surgery and second look laparoscopy (4-12 weeks)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Feb 2018.