LymphomaPhase 2METRO BNCT02260414
Effects of Anticoagulant Preventive Injection in Patients With Blood Cancer
A Phase 2 study testing Tinzaparin and Blood sample in people with Lymphoma and Multiple Myeloma, run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint Etienne at 1 site in France.
Trial summary
In cancer, the incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) is particularly high in patients with myeloma, especially when it is de novo and treated with thalidomide, lenalidomide or erythropoietin. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Lymphoma, Multiple Myeloma
- What is being tested?
- Tinzaparin and Blood sample
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 19 participants
- Where
- 1 siteFrance
- Study dates
- 14 Apr 2015to 9 May 2017
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Body weight between 40 and 100 kg
- Patient:
- 2a- With multiple myeloma indication with de novo standard treatment thalidomide or lenalidomide or erythropoietin (group 1) 2b- Or hospitalized for aggressive lymphoma treated with chemotherapy (group 2) 2c- Or older than 40 years and hospitalized at least three days for an acute medical pathology type of acute respiratory or cardiac (group 3) decompensation
Who cannot join
- Patient requiring anticoagulant therapy at curative doses
- Patients with a lower platelet count 80 G / L
- Subject with a history of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
- Subject with a history of hemorrhagic disease
- History of severe trauma within 6 weeks prior to enrollment
- Organic lesion at risk of bleeding
Show all 11Show fewer
- Poor renal with creatinine clearance <30 ml / min
- Hypersensitivity to Tinzaparin
- Events or bleeding tendencies associated with coagulation disorders
- Subject on oral anticoagulant
- For group 3: Presence of hematological malignancy or active cancer
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Effects of Injection Tinzaparin Prophylactic Dose (4,500 IU Anti-Xa) on Thrombin Generation in Patients With Multiple Myeloma, Lymphoma Patients and Patients Hospitalized for an Acute Medical Condition.
In cancer, the incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) is particularly high in patients with myeloma, especially when it is de novo and treated with thalidomide, lenalidomide or erythropoietin. Curiously, the prevention of VTE with LMWH (low-molecular-weight heparin) in myeloma seems no more effective than that achieved with aspirin, while the effectiveness of the latter in the primary prevention of VTE has never been demonstrated regardless of the type of population considered. Meanwhile, a biological study showed that prophylactic doses of LMWH in patients with different types of cancer did not always optimal reduction of thrombin peak during the 24 hours following the injection of LMWH. These clinical and biological studies lead to the conclusion that patients with myeloma may be resistant to the usual doses of preventive LMWH, which may explain the failure of prevention.
Initially we intend to investigate whether this resistance to prophylactic doses of LMWH is present in patient's biology and if this resistance is specific to myeloma in hematological cancers. For this, we propose to study the evolution of thrombin generation by Thrombinography during 24 hours after subcutaneous injection of 4500 anti-Xa IU Tinzaparin in 6 patients with de novo myeloma whit high thrombo embolic risk ie treated with thalidomide, lenalidomide or erythropoietin. LMWH is Tinzaparin chosen because it does not accumulate in patients with impaired renal function, and has a greater anti-biological activity thrombotic than other LMWH.
To assess whether the observed pattern of thrombin generation is particularly multiple myeloma, we will take the same study in 6 patients with aggressive lymphoma and 6 medical patients hospitalized for acute heart and respiratory failure.
- Conditions
- Lymphoma, Multiple Myeloma
- Being tested
- Tinzaparin, Blood sample
- Keywords
- Endogenous Thrombin Potential, Lymphoma, Multiple Myeloma, tinzaparin, thrombin generation, Thromboplastin generation tests
- Medical subject headings
- Lymphoma, Multiple Myeloma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
TinzaparinDrug
single subcutaneous injection of 4500 IU tinzaparin
Blood sampleOther
blood sample taken at hours 0, 3, 8, 18 and 24 after subcutaneous injection of 4500 IU tinzaparin
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Patients with multiple myeloma | Experimental | Patient with multiple myeloma indication with de novo standard treatment thalidomide or lenalidomide or erythropoietin treated with one injection of 4500 IU tinzaparin and blood samples taken at hours : 0, 3, 8, 18 and 24 after subcutaneous injection of tinzaparin Receives: Drug: Tinzaparin; Other: Blood sample |
| Patients with agressive lymphoma | Active comparator | Patient hospitalized for aggressive lymphoma treated with chemotherapy treated with one injection of 4500 IU tinzaparin and blood samples taken at hours : 0, 3, 8, 18 and 24 after subcutaneous injection of tinzaparin Receives: Drug: Tinzaparin; Other: Blood sample |
| Patients with acute medical condition | Active comparator | Patient older than 40 years and hospitalized at least three days for an acute medical pathology type of acute respiratory or cardiac treated with one injection of 4500 IU tinzaparin and blood samples taken at hours : 0, 3, 8, 18 and 24 after subcutaneous injection of tinzaparin Receives: Drug: Tinzaparin; Other: Blood sample |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Endogenous Thrombin Potential (ETP, nM.min) for all patients with de novo myeloma with high thrombotic risk
Endogenous Thrombin Potential (i.e. the aera under the thrombin generation curve, nM.min) is measured by Thromboplastin Generation Tests (TGTs) following a single injection of 4500 IU tinzaparin
Measured: hours : 0, 3, 8, 18, 24
Secondary outcomes (3)
Endogenous Thrombin Potential (ETP, nM.min) for all patients with aggressive lymphoma treated with chemotherapy
Endogenous Thrombin Potential (i.e. the aera under the thrombin generation curve, nM.min) is measured by Thromboplastin Generation Tests (TGTs) following a single injection of 4500 IU tinzaparin
Measured: hours : 0, 3, 8, 18, 24
Endogenous Thrombin Potential (ETP, nM.min) for all patients with over 40 years hospitalized for heart or respiratory failure
Endogenous Thrombin Potential (i.e. the aera under the thrombin generation curve, nM.min) is measured by Thromboplastin Generation Tests (TGTs) following a single injection of 4500 IU tinzaparin
Measured: hours : 0, 3, 8, 18, 24
Differences of Endogenous Thrombin Potential (ETP, nM.min) between group 1 and group 2 et 3
Endogenous Thrombin Potential (i.e. the aera under the thrombin generation curve, nM.min) is measured by Thromboplastin Generation Tests (TGTs) following a single injection of 4500 IU tinzaparin
Measured: hours : 0, 3, 8, 18, 24
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 Oct 2014 (estimated)
- Study start14 Apr 2015
- Primary completion9 May 2017
- Study completion9 May 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for LymphomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint EtienneThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 19 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- LEO Pharma
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Bernard TARDY, PhD, Principal investigator, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint Etienne
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02260414
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 1408049
- Other IDs
- 2014-000946-31, 2014
- Acronym
- METRO B
- Status last verified
- May 2017
- First submitted
- 2 Oct 2014
- Last updated
- 11 May 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 May 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effects of Injection Tinzaparin Prophylactic Dose (4,500 IU Anti-Xa) on Thrombin Generation in Patients With Multiple Myeloma, Lymphoma Patients and Patients Hospitalized for an Acute Medical Condition.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02260414
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- METRO B / 1408049
- Conditions
- Lymphoma, Multiple Myeloma
- Keywords
- Endogenous Thrombin Potential, Lymphoma, Multiple Myeloma, tinzaparin, thrombin generation, Thromboplastin generation tests
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 19 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint EtienneUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- LEO Pharma
- Study start
- 14 Apr 2015 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 9 May 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- 9 May 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 9 Oct 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
In cancer, the incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) is particularly high in patients with myeloma, especially when it is de novo and treated with thalidomide, lenalidomide or erythropoietin. Curiously, the prevention of VTE with LMWH (low-molecular-weight heparin) in myeloma seems no more effective than that achieved with aspirin, while the effectiveness of the latter in the primary prevention of VTE has never been demonstrated regardless of the type of population considered. Meanwhile, a biological study showed that prophylactic doses of LMWH in patients with different types of cancer did not always optimal reduction of thrombin peak during the 24 hours following the injection of LMWH. These clinical and biological studies lead to the conclusion that patients with myeloma may be resistant to the usual doses of preventive LMWH, which may explain the failure of prevention.
Initially we intend to investigate whether this resistance to prophylactic doses of LMWH is present in patient's biology and if this resistance is specific to myeloma in hematological cancers. For this, we propose to study the evolution of thrombin generation by Thrombinography during 24 hours after subcutaneous injection of 4500 anti-Xa IU Tinzaparin in 6 patients with de novo myeloma whit high thrombo embolic risk ie treated with thalidomide, lenalidomide or erythropoietin. LMWH is Tinzaparin chosen because it does not accumulate in patients with impaired renal function, and has a greater anti-biological activity thrombotic than other LMWH.
To assess whether the observed pattern of thrombin generation is particularly multiple myeloma, we will take the same study in 6 patients with aggressive lymphoma and 6 medical patients hospitalized for acute heart and respiratory failure.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Patients with multiple myeloma | Experimental | Drug: Tinzaparin, Other: Blood samplePatient with multiple myeloma indication with de novo standard treatment thalidomide or lenalidomide or erythropoietin treated with one injection of 4500 IU tinzaparin and blood samples taken at hours : 0, 3, 8, 18 and 24 after subcutaneous injection of tinzaparin |
| Patients with agressive lymphoma | Active comparator | Drug: Tinzaparin, Other: Blood samplePatient hospitalized for aggressive lymphoma treated with chemotherapy treated with one injection of 4500 IU tinzaparin and blood samples taken at hours : 0, 3, 8, 18 and 24 after subcutaneous injection of tinzaparin |
| Patients with acute medical condition | Active comparator | Drug: Tinzaparin, Other: Blood samplePatient older than 40 years and hospitalized at least three days for an acute medical pathology type of acute respiratory or cardiac treated with one injection of 4500 IU tinzaparin and blood samples taken at hours : 0, 3, 8, 18 and 24 after subcutaneous injection of tinzaparin |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Body weight between 40 and 100 kg
- Patient:
- 2a- With multiple myeloma indication with de novo standard treatment thalidomide or lenalidomide or erythropoietin (group 1) 2b- Or hospitalized for aggressive lymphoma treated with chemotherapy (group 2) 2c- Or older than 40 years and hospitalized at least three days for an acute medical pathology type of acute respiratory or cardiac (group 3) decompensation
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Patient requiring anticoagulant therapy at curative doses
- Patients with a lower platelet count 80 G / L
- Subject with a history of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
- Subject with a history of hemorrhagic disease
- History of severe trauma within 6 weeks prior to enrollment
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Tinzaparinsingle subcutaneous injection of 4500 IU tinzaparin | Drug | Patients with acute medical condition, Patients with agressive lymphoma, Patients with multiple myeloma |
| Blood sampleblood sample taken at hours 0, 3, 8, 18 and 24 after subcutaneous injection of 4500 IU tinzaparin | Other | Patients with acute medical condition, Patients with agressive lymphoma, Patients with multiple myeloma |
Primary outcome
Endogenous Thrombin Potential (ETP, nM.min) for all patients with de novo myeloma with high thrombotic risk
Time frame: hours : 0, 3, 8, 18, 24
Endogenous Thrombin Potential (i.e. the aera under the thrombin generation curve, nM.min) is measured by Thromboplastin Generation Tests (TGTs) following a single injection of 4500 IU tinzaparin
3 secondary outcomes
Endogenous Thrombin Potential (ETP, nM.min) for all patients with aggressive lymphoma treated with chemotherapy
Time frame: hours : 0, 3, 8, 18, 24
Endogenous Thrombin Potential (ETP, nM.min) for all patients with over 40 years hospitalized for heart or respiratory failure
Time frame: hours : 0, 3, 8, 18, 24
Differences of Endogenous Thrombin Potential (ETP, nM.min) between group 1 and group 2 et 3
Time frame: hours : 0, 3, 8, 18, 24
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 May 2017.
Related trials for Lymphoma
RecruitingPhase 2
Tafasitamab With Acalabrutinib and Venetoclax for the Treatment of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
RecruitingPhase 2
Ibrutinib Combination Therapy in Transplant Ineligible Individuals With Newly Diagnosed Primary CNS Lymphoma
Non-hodgkin Lymphoma
RecruitingObservational study
Blood, Urine, and Tissue Collection for Cutaneous Lymphoma, Eczema, and Atopic Dermatitis Research
Cutaneous T-cell Lymphoma, Sezary Syndrome
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Testing the Addition of an Anti-Cancer Drug, Glofitamab, to the Usual Chemotherapy Treatment (Alternating R-CHOP/R-DHAP) for Previously Untreated Mantle Cell Lymphoma
Ann Arbor Stage II Mantle Cell Lymphoma, Ann Arbor Stage III Mantle Cell Lymphoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Brentuximab Vedotin and Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With CD30-Positive Peripheral T-cell Lymphoma
Adult T-Cell Leukemia/Lymphoma, Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma, ALK-Negative
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Bernard TARDY, PhD principal investigator
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint Etienne
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Tinzaparin and Blood sample in people with Lymphoma and Multiple Myeloma, run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint Etienne at 1 site in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 May 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Endogenous Thrombin Potential (ETP, nM.min) for all patients with de novo myeloma with high thrombotic risk (time frame: hours : 0, 3, 8, 18, 24). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 May 2017.