Atopic DermatitisPhase 3CHRONOSNCT02260986
Study to Assess the Efficacy and Long-term Safety of Dupilumab (REGN668/SAR231893) in Adult Participants With Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis
A Phase 3 study testing Dupilumab and Topical Corticosteroid (TCS) in people with Atopic Dermatitis, run by Regeneron Pharmaceuticals at 148 sites in 14 countries.
Trial summary
The primary objective of the study was to demonstrate the efficacy of Dupilumab administered concomitantly with topical corticosteroid (TCS) through Week 16 in adult participants with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) compared to placebo administered concomitantly with TCS. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Atopic Dermatitis
- What is being tested?
- Dupilumab and Topical Corticosteroid (TCS)
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 740 participants
- Where
- 148 sitesin 14 countries
- Study dates
- Sep 2014to Oct 2016
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Chronic AD that had been present for at least 3 years before the screening visit;
- Documented recent history (within 6 months before the screening visit) of inadequate response to a sufficient course of out-patient treatment with topical AD medication(s).
Who cannot join
- Participation in a prior Dupilumab clinical trial;
- Important side effects of topical medication (e.g. intolerance to treatment, hypersensitivity reactions, significant skin atrophy, systemic effects), as assessed by the investigator or treating physician;
- Having used any of the following treatments within 4 weeks before the baseline visit, or any condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, was likely to require such treatment(s) during the first 2 weeks of study treatment:
- Immunosuppressive/immunomodulating drugs (e.g, systemic steroids, cyclosporine, mycophenolate-mofetil, Janus kinase inhibitors, interferon-gamma [IFN-γ], azathioprine, methotrexate, etc.);
- Phototherapy for AD;
- Treatment with a live (attenuated) vaccine within 12 weeks before the baseline visit;
Show all 12Show fewer
- History of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection or positive HIV serology at screening;
- Positive hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), hepatitis B core antibody (HBcAb), or hepatitis C antibody at the screening visit;
- Active or acute infection requiring systemic treatment within 2 weeks before baseline visit;
- Known or suspected history of immunosuppression;
- Pregnant or breastfeeding women, or planning to become pregnant or breastfeed during the participant's participation in this study.
- Note: The eligibility criteria listed above is not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a participant's potential participation in a clinical trial therefore not all inclusion/ exclusion criteria are listed.
Trial locations and contacts
148 sites in 14 countries.
148 sites in 14 countries
United States50 sites
Study site
Albuquerque, New Mexico
Study site
Alpharetta, Georgia
Study site
Ann Arbor, Michigan
Study site
Austin, Texas
Study site
Bay City, Michigan
Study site
Carmel, Indiana
Study site
Cincinnati, Ohio
Study site
Columbus, Georgia
Study site
Corning, New York
Study site
Dallas, Texas
Study site
Edgewater, Florida
Study site
Edina, Minnesota
Study site
Encinitas, California
Study site
Exton, Pennsylvania
Study site
Fridley, Minnesota
Study site
Hazleton, Pennsylvania
Study site
Henderson, Nevada
Study site
Henrico, Virginia
Study site
Hot Springs, Arkansas
Study site
Lake Oswego, Oregon
Study site
Lake Worth, Florida
Study site
Little Rock, Arkansas
Study site
Miami Lakes, Florida
Study site
New Albany, Indiana
Study site
New Haven, Connecticut
Study site
New York, New York
Study site
Norfolk, Virginia
Study site
Norman, Oklahoma
Study site
Oceanside, California
Study site
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
Study site
Omaha, Nebraska
Study site
Orlando, Florida
Study site
Palmdale, California
Study site
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Study site
Phoenix, Arizona
Study site
Portland, Oregon
Study site
Richmond, Virginia
Study site
Rockville, Maryland
Study site
San Diego, California
Study site
Savannah, Georgia
Study site
Smithtown, New York
Study site
South Burlington, Vermont
Study site
Spokane, Washington
Study site
St Louis, Missouri
Study site
Stony Brook, New York
Study site
Tampa, Florida
Study site
Trumbull, Connecticut
Study site
Verona, New Jersey
Study site
West Dundee, Illinois
Study site
West Jordan, Utah
Japan17 sites
Study site
Adachi-ku, Tôkyô
Study site
Amagasaki, Hyôgo
Study site
Chiyoda-ku, Tôkyô
Study site
Fukuoka
Study site
Kamimashiki-gun, Kumamoto
Study site
Kitakyushu, Fukuoka
Study site
Koto-ku, Tokyo
Study site
Nakano, Tôkyô
Study site
Nerima-ku, Tôkyô
Study site
Saitama-shi, Saitama
Study site
Setagaya-ku, Tokyo
Study site
Shibuya-ku, Tôkyô
Study site
Shinagawa-ku, Tôkyô
Study site
Shinjuku-ku, Tôkyô
Study site
Suginami-ku, Tôkyô
Study site
Yaizu, Shizuoka
Study site
Yokohama, Kanagawa
Canada16 sites
Study site
Ajax, Ontario
Study site
Barrie, Ontario
Study site
Drummondville, Quebec
Study site
Hamilton, Ontario
Study site
Markham, Ontario
Study site
North Bay, Ontario
Study site
Oakville, Ontario
Study site
Ottawa, Ontario
Study site
Peterborough, Ontario
Study site
Québec
Study site
Richmond Hill, Ontario
Study site
Surrey, British Columbia
Study site
Toronto, Ontario
Study site
Vancouver, British Columbia
Study site
Waterloo, Ontario
Study site
Windsor, Ontario
Poland14 sites
Study site
Bialystok, Podlaskie Voivodeship
Study site
Gdansk, Pomeranian Voivodeship
Study site
Gdynia
Study site
Iwonicz-Zdrój, Podkarpackie Voivodeship
Study site
Katowice, Silesian Voivodeship
Study site
Krakow, Lesser Poland Voivodeship
Study site
Lodz, Łódź Voivodeship
Study site
Lublin, Lublin Voivodeship
Study site
Poznan, Greater Poland Voivodeship
Study site
Skarżysko-Kamienna, Świętokrzyskie Voivodeship
Study site
Strzelce Opolskie, Opole Voivodeship
Study site
Szczecin, West Pomeranian Voivodeship
Study site
Warsaw, Masovian Voivodeship
Study site
Wroclaw, Lower Silesian Voivodeship
United Kingdom9 sites
Study site
Dundee, Angus
Study site
Edgbaston, Birmingham
Study site
Glasgow, Glasgow City
Study site
Liverpool
Study site
Manchester
Study site
Northwood, Middlesex
Study site
Reading
Study site
Salford
Study site
Sidcup, Kent
Italy7 sites
Study site
Ancona
Study site
Bologna
Study site
Brescia
Study site
Novara
Study site
Pavia
Study site
Perugia
Study site
Roma
Australia6 sites
Study site
Benowa, Queensland
Study site
Carlton, Victoria
Study site
Dulwich, Queensland
Study site
Hectorville, South Australia
Study site
Kogarah, New South Wales
Study site
Phillip, Australian Capital Territory
Czechia5 sites
Study site
Hradec Králové
Study site
Náchod
Study site
Prague
Study site
Svitavy
Study site
Ústí nad Labem
Netherlands5 sites
Study site
Amsterdam, North Holland
Study site
Breda, North Brabant
Study site
Groningen
Study site
Rotterdam, South Holland
Study site
Utrecht
Romania5 sites
Study site
Brasov, Brașov County
Study site
Bucharest, Bucharest
Study site
Cluj-Napoca, Cluj
Study site
Craiova, Dolj
Study site
Târgu Mureş, Mureș County
South Korea5 sites
Study site
Bucheon-si, Gyeonggido
Study site
Seodaemun-gu
Study site
Seoul, Seoul Teugbyeolsi
Study site
Suwon, Gyeonggido
Study site
Uijeongbu-si
Hungary4 sites
Study site
Budapest
Study site
Orosháza, Bekes County
Study site
Szolnok, Jász-Nagykun-Szolnok
Study site
Veszprém, Veszprém megye
Spain3 sites
Study site
Alicante
Study site
Barcelona, Catalonia
Study site
Madrid
About this study
Official title: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Demonstrate the Efficacy and Long-Term Safety of Dupilumab in Adult Patients With Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis
The primary objective of the study was to demonstrate the efficacy of Dupilumab administered concomitantly with topical corticosteroid (TCS) through Week 16 in adult participants with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) compared to placebo administered concomitantly with TCS.
- Conditions
- Atopic Dermatitis
- Being tested
- Dupilumab, Placebo (for Dupilumab), Topical Corticosteroid (TCS)
- Medical subject headings
- Dermatitis, Atopic
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
DupilumabDrug
Also called REGN668, SAR231893, Dupixent
Subcutaneous injection in the different quadrants of the abdomen (avoiding navel and waist areas) and upper thighs
Placebo (for Dupilumab)Drug
Subcutaneous injection in the different quadrants of the abdomen (avoiding navel and waist areas) and upper thighs
Topical Corticosteroid (TCS)Other
All participants were required to treatment with a (TCS) using a standardized regimen. It was recommended that participants use triamcinolone acetonide 0.1% cream or fluocinolone acetonide 0.025% ointment for medium potency, and hydrocortisone 1% cream for low potency.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo qw | Experimental | Two subcutaneous injections of Placebo (for Dupilumab) as a loading dose on Day 1 followed by a single injection weekly (qw) from Week 1 to Week 51. Receives: Drug: Placebo (for Dupilumab); Other: Topical Corticosteroid (TCS) |
| Dupilumab 300 mg q2w | Experimental | Two subcutaneous injections of Dupilumab 300 mg (for a total of 600 mg) as a loading dose on Day 1, followed by placebo (for Dupilumab) alternating with single 300 mg injection of Dupilumab every 2 weeks (q2w) from Week 1 to Week 51. During weeks in which Dupilumab was not administered, participants received placebo. Receives: Drug: Dupilumab; Drug: Placebo (for Dupilumab); Other: Topical Corticosteroid (TCS) |
| Dupilumab 300 mg qw | Experimental | Two subcutaneous injections of Dupilumab 300 mg (for a total of 600 mg) as a loading dose on Day 1, followed by a single 300 mg injection of Dupilumab qw from Week 1 to Week 51. Receives: Drug: Dupilumab; Other: Topical Corticosteroid (TCS) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Participants With Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of "0" or "1" and Reduction From Baseline of ≥2 Points at Week 16
IGA is an assessment scale used to determine severity of AD and clinical response to treatment on a 5-point scale (0 = clear; 1 = almost clear; 2 = mild; 3 = moderate; 4 = severe) based on erythema and papulation/infiltration. Therapeutic response is an IGA score of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear). Participants with IGA score "0" or "1" and a reduction from baseline of ≥2 points at Week 16 were reported.
Measured: Baseline to Week 16
Secondary outcomes (34)
Percentage of Participants With Eczema Area and Severity Index-75 (EASI-75) (≥75% Improvement From Baseline) at Week 16
The EASI score was used to measure the severity and extent of atopic dermatitis (AD) and measures erythema, infiltration, excoriation and lichenification on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper and lower extremities. The total EASI score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 72 (maximum) points, with the higher scores reflecting the worse severity of AD. EASI-75 responders were the participants who achieved ≥75% overall improvement in EASI score from baseline to Week 16.
Measured: Baseline to Week 16
Percentage of Participants With Improvement (Reduction ≥4 Points) of Weekly Average of Peak Daily Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score From Baseline to Week 16
Pruritus NRS was an assessment tool that was used to report the intensity of a participant's pruritus (itch), both maximum and average intensity, during a 24-hour recall period. Participants were asked the following question: how would a participant rate his itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours (for maximum itch intensity on a scale of 0 - 10 [0 = no itch; 10 = worst itch imaginable]). Participants achieving a reduction of ≥4 points from baseline in weekly average of peak daily pruritus NRS score at Week 16 were reported.
Measured: Baseline to Week 16
Percentage of Participants With Improvement (Reduction ≥3 Points) of Weekly Average of Peak Daily Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score From Baseline to Week 16
Pruritus NRS was an assessment tool that was used to report the intensity of a participant's pruritus (itch), both maximum and average intensity, during a 24-hour recall period. Participants were asked the following question: how would a participant rate his itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours (for maximum itch intensity on a scale of 0 - 10 [0 = no itch; 10 = worst itch imaginable]). Participants achieving a reduction of ≥3 points from baseline in weekly average of peak daily pruritus NRS score at Week 16 were reported.
Measured: Baseline to Week 16
Percentage of Participants With Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of "0" or "1" and Reduction From Baseline of ≥2 Points at Week 52
IGA is an assessment scale used to determine severity of AD and clinical response to treatment on a 5-point scale (0 = clear; 1 = almost clear; 2 = mild; 3 = moderate; 4 = severe) based on erythema and papulation/infiltration. Therapeutic response is an IGA score of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear). Participants with IGA score of "0" or "1" and a reduction from baseline of ≥2 points at Week 52 were reported.
Measured: Baseline to Week 52
Percentage of Participants With Eczema Area and Severity Index-75 (EASI-75) (≥75% Improvement From Baseline) at Week 52
The EASI score was used to measure the severity and extent of AD and measured erythema, infiltration, excoriation and lichenification on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper and lower extremities. The total EASI score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 72 (maximum) points, with the higher scores reflecting the worse severity of AD. EASI-75 responders were the participants who achieved ≥75% overall improvement in EASI score from baseline to Week 52.
Measured: Baseline to Week 52
Percent Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Peak Daily Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score to Week 16
Pruritus NRS was an assessment tool that was used to report the intensity of a participant's pruritus (itch), both maximum and average intensity, during a 24-hour recall period. Participants were asked the following question: how would a participant rate his itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours (for maximum itch intensity on a scale of 0 - 10 [0 = no itch; 10 = worst itch imaginable]).
Measured: Baseline to Week 16
Percentage of Participants With Improvement (Reduction ≥4 Points) of Weekly Average of Peak Daily Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score From Baseline to Week 52
Pruritus NRS was an assessment tool that was used to report the intensity of a participant's pruritus (itch), both maximum and average intensity, during a 24-hour recall period. Participants were asked the following question: how would a participant rate his itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours (for maximum itch intensity on a scale of 0 - 10 [0 = no itch; 10 = worst itch imaginable]). Participants achieving a reduction of ≥4 points from baseline in weekly average of peak daily pruritus NRS score at Week 52 were reported.
Measured: Baseline to Week 52
Percentage of Participants With Improvement (Reduction ≥3 Points) of Weekly Average of Peak Daily Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score From Baseline to Week 52
Pruritus NRS was an assessment tool that was used to report the intensity of a participant's pruritus (itch), both maximum and average intensity, during a 24-hour recall period. Participants were asked the following question: how would a participant rate his itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours (for maximum itch intensity on a scale of 0 - 10 [0 = no itch; 10 = worst itch imaginable]). Participants achieving a reduction of ≥3 points from baseline in weekly average of peak daily pruritus NRS score at Week 52 were reported.
Measured: Baseline to Week 52
Percentage of Participants With Improvement (Reduction ≥4 Points) of Weekly Average of Peak Daily Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score From Baseline to Week 24
Pruritus NRS was an assessment tool that was used to report the intensity of a participant's pruritus (itch), both maximum and average intensity, during a 24-hour recall period. Participants were asked the following question: how would a participant rate his itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours (for maximum itch intensity on a scale of 0 - 10 [0 = no itch; 10 = worst itch imaginable]). Participants achieving a reduction of ≥4 points from baseline in weekly average of peak daily pruritus NRS score at Week 24 were reported.
Measured: Baseline to Week 24
Percentage of Participants With Improvement (Reduction ≥4 Points) of Weekly Average of Peak Daily Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score From Baseline to Week 4
Pruritus NRS was an assessment tool that was used to report the intensity of a participant's pruritus (itch), both maximum and average intensity, during a 24-hour recall period. Participants were asked the following question: how would a participant rate his itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours (for maximum itch intensity on a scale of 0 - 10 [0 = no itch; 10 = worst itch imaginable]). Participants achieving a reduction of ≥4 points from baseline in weekly average of peak daily pruritus NRS score at Week 4 were reported.
Measured: Baseline to Week 4
Percentage of Participants With Improvement (Reduction ≥4 Points) of Weekly Average of Peak Daily Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score From Baseline to Week 2
Pruritus NRS was an assessment tool that was used to report the intensity of a participant's pruritus (itch), both maximum and average intensity, during a 24-hour recall period. Participants were asked the following question: how would a participant rate his itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours (for maximum itch intensity on a scale of 0 - 10 [0 = no itch; 10 = worst itch imaginable]). Participants achieving a reduction of ≥4 points from baseline in weekly average of peak daily pruritus NRS score at Week 2 were reported.
Measured: Baseline to Week 2
Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Peak Daily Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score to Week 16
Pruritus NRS was an assessment tool that was used to report the intensity of a participant's pruritus (itch), both maximum and average intensity, during a 24-hour recall period. Participants were asked the following question: how would a participant rate his itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours (for maximum itch intensity on a scale of 0 - 10 [0 = no itch; 10 = worst itch imaginable]).
Measured: Baseline to Week 16
Percent Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score to Week 16
The EASI score was used to measure the severity and extent of AD and measured erythema, infiltration, excoriation and lichenification on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper and lower extremities. The total EASI score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 72 (maximum) points, with the higher scores reflecting the worse severity of AD.
Measured: Baseline to Week 16
Change From Baseline in Percent Body Surface Area (BSA) Affected by Atopic Dermatitis to Week 16
BSA affected by AD was assessed for each section of the body (the possible highest score for each region was: head and neck [9%], anterior trunk [18%], back [18%], upper limbs [18%], lower limbs [36%], and genitals [1%]). It was reported as a percentage of all major body sections combined.
Measured: Baseline to Week 16
Percent Change From Baseline in the SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) Score to Week 16
SCORAD was a clinical tool for assessing the severity of AD developed by the European Task Force on Atopic Dermatitis (Severity scoring of atopic dermatitis: the SCORAD index). Consensus Report of the European Task Force on Atopic Dermatitis. Dermatology (Basel) 186 (1): 23-31. 1993. Extent and intensity of eczema as well as subjective signs (insomnia, etc.) were assessed and scored. Total score ranges from 0 (absent disease) to 103 (severe disease).
Measured: Baseline to Week 16
Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) to Week 16
The DLQI was a 10-item, validated questionnaire used in clinical practice and clinical trials to assess the impact of AD disease symptoms and treatment on quality of life (QOL). The 10 questions assessed QOL over the past week, with an overall scoring of 0 (absent disease) to 30 (severe disease); a high score was indicative of a poor QOL.
Measured: Baseline to Week 16
Change From Baseline in Patient Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) to Week 16
The POEM was a 7-item questionnaire that assessed disease symptoms (dryness, itching, flaking, cracking, sleep loss, bleeding and weeping) with a scoring system of 0 (absent disease) to 28 (severe disease) (high score indicative of poor quality of life [QOL]).
Measured: Baseline to Week 16
Change From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (HADS) to Week 16
HADS is a fourteen item scale. Seven of the items relate to anxiety and seven items relate to depression. Each item on the questionnaire scored from 0 (minimum score) - 3 (maximum score) and this means that a person can score between 0 (no symptoms) and 21 (severe symptoms) for either anxiety or depression. Cut-offs for identifying psychiatric distress has been reported as 7 to 8 for possible presence, 10 to 11 for probable presence, and 14 to 15 for severe anxiety or depression.
Measured: Baseline to Week 16
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Global Individual Signs Score (GISS) to Week 16
Individual components of the AD lesions (erythema, infiltration/ papulation, excoriations, and lichenification) were rated globally (each assessed for the whole body, not by anatomical region) on a 4-point scale (0= none, 1= mild, 2= moderate and 3= severe) using the EASI severity grading criteria. Total score ranges from 0 (absent disease) to 12 (severe disease).
Measured: Baseline to Week 16
Proportion of Topical Atopic Dermatitis Medication-Free Days Through Week 52
Proportion of topical AD medication-free days through Week 52 was calculated as the number of days that a participant used neither topical corticosteroid (TCS)/ topical calcineurin inhibitors (TCI) nor system rescue therapy divided by the study days of each period.
Measured: Baseline to Week 52
Percent Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Peak Daily Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score to Week 2
Pruritus NRS was an assessment tool that was used to report the intensity of a participant's pruritus (itch), both maximum and average intensity, during a 24-hour recall period. Participants were asked the following question: how would a participant rate his itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours (for maximum itch intensity on a scale of 0 - 10 [0 = no itch; 10 = worst itch imaginable]).
Measured: Baseline to Week 2
Percent Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score to Week 52
The EASI score was used to measure the severity and extent of AD and measured erythema, infiltration, excoriation and lichenification on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper and lower extremities. The total EASI score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 72 (maximum) points, with the higher scores reflecting the worse severity of AD.
Measured: Baseline to Week 52
Change From Baseline in Percent Body Surface Area (BSA) Affected by Atopic Dermatitis to Week 52
BSA affected by AD was assessed for each section of the body (the possible highest score for each region was: head and neck [9%], anterior trunk [18%], back [18%], upper limbs [18%], lower limbs [36%], and genitals [1%]). It was reported as a percentage of all major body sections combined.
Measured: Baseline to Week 52
Percent Change From Baseline in the SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) Score to Week 52
SCORAD was a clinical tool for assessing the severity of AD developed by the European Task Force on Atopic Dermatitis (Severity scoring of atopic dermatitis: the SCORAD index). Consensus Report of the European Task Force on Atopic Dermatitis. Dermatology (Basel) 186 (1): 23-31. 1993. Extent and intensity of eczema as well as subjective signs (insomnia, etc.) were assessed and scored. Total score ranges from 0 (absent disease) to 103 (severe disease).
Measured: Baseline to Week 52
Percent Change From Baseline in Global Individual Signs Score (GISS) to Week 52
Individual components of the AD lesions (erythema, infiltration/ papulation, excoriations, and lichenification) were rated globally (each assessed for the whole body, not by anatomical region) on a 4-point scale (0= none, 1= mild, 2= moderate and 3= severe) using the EASI severity grading criteria. Total score ranges from 0 (absent disease) to 12 (severe disease).
Measured: Baseline to Week 52
Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) to Week 52
The DLQI was a 10-item, validated questionnaire used in clinical practice and clinical trials to assess the impact of AD disease symptoms and treatment on quality of life (QOL). The 10 questions assessed QOL over the past week, with an overall scoring of 0 (absent disease) to 30 (severe disease); a high score was indicative of a poor QOL.
Measured: Baseline to Week 52
Change From Baseline in Patient Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) to Week 52
The POEM was a 7-item questionnaire that assesses disease symptoms (dryness, itching, flaking, cracking, sleep loss, bleeding and weeping) with a scoring system of 0 (absent disease) to 28 (severe disease) (high score indicative of poor quality of life [QOL]).
Measured: Baseline to Week 52
Change From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (HADS) to Week 52
HADS is a fourteen item scale. Seven of the items relate to anxiety and seven items relate to depression. Each item on the questionnaire is scored from 0 (minimum score) - 3 (maximum score) and this means that a person can score between 0 (no symptoms) and 21 (severe symptoms) for either anxiety or depression. Cut-offs for identifying psychiatric distress has been reported as 7 to 8 for possible presence, 10 to 11 for probable presence, and 14 to 15 for severe anxiety or depression.
Measured: Baseline to Week 52
Number of Flares Through Week 52
Atopic dermatitis (AD) flares were defined as worsening of the disease that required escalation/intensification of AD treatment. Number of flares occurred in the participants starting from first dose through Week 52 were reported.
Measured: Baseline up to Week 52
Number of Serious Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Leading to Study Drug Discontinuation Through Week 52
Any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received investigational medicinal product (IMP) was considered an AE without regard to possibility of causal relationship with this treatment. A Serious adverse event (SAE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death, life-threatening, required initial or prolonged in-patient hospitalization, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect, or considered as medically important event. Any TEAE included participants with both serious and non-serious AEs.
Measured: Baseline up to Week 52
Percentage of Participants With Skin Infection Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Excluding Herpetic Infections) From Baseline Through Week 52
Any untoward medical occurrence in a participants who received IMP was considered an AE without regard to possibility of causal relationship with this treatment. TEAEs were defined as AEs that developed or worsened or became serious during on-treatment period (time from the first dose of study drug up to end of treatment at Week 52). Any TEAE included participants with both serious and non-serious AEs. Skin infection TEAEs were identified based on blinded adjudication of all reported TEAEs under the 2 primary System Organ Classes (SOC): SOC = "Infection and Infestations" or SOC = "Skin and Subcutaneous Tissue Disorders". Blinded adjudication was performed and finalized by the study medical monitor before database lock.
Measured: Baseline up to Week 52
Number of Skin Infection TEAEs (Excluding Herpetic Infections) From Baseline Through Week 52
Any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received IMP was considered an AE without regard to possibility of causal relationship with this treatment. TEAEs were defined as AEs that developed or worsened or became serious during on-treatment period (time from the first dose of study drug up to end of treatment at Week 52). Any TEAE included participants with both serious and non-serious AEs. Skin infection TEAEs were identified based on blinded adjudication of all reported TEAEs under the 2 primary System Organ Classes (SOC): SOC = "Infection and Infestations" or SOC = "Skin and Subcutaneous Tissue Disorders". Blinded adjudication was performed and finalized by the study medical monitor before database lock.
Measured: Baseline up to Week 52
Percentage of Participants With Skin Infection Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Excluding Herpetic Infections) Requiring Systemic Treatment From Baseline Through Week 52
Any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received IMP was considered an AE without regard to possibility of causal relationship with this treatment. TEAEs were defined as AEs that developed or worsened or became serious during on-treatment period (time from the first dose of study drug up to end of treatment at Week 52). Any TEAE included participants with both serious and non-serious AEs. Skin infection TEAEs were identified based on blinded adjudication of all reported TEAEs under the 2 primary System Organ Classes (SOC): SOC = "Infection and Infestations" or SOC = "Skin and Subcutaneous Tissue Disorders". Blinded adjudication was performed and finalized by the study medical monitor before database lock.
Measured: Baseline up to Week 52
Number of Skin Infection Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Excluding Herpetic Infections) Requiring Systemic Treatment From Baseline Through Week 52
Any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received IMP was considered an AE without regard to possibility of causal relationship with this treatment. TEAEs were defined as AEs that developed or worsened or became serious during on-treatment period (time from the first dose of study drug up to end of treatment at Week 52). Any TEAE included participants with both serious and non-serious AEs. Skin infection TEAEs were identified based on blinded adjudication of all reported TEAEs under the 2 primary System Organ Classes (SOC): SOC = "Infection and Infestations" or SOC = "Skin and Subcutaneous Tissue Disorders". Blinded adjudication was performed and finalized by the study medical monitor before database lock.
Measured: Baseline up to Week 52
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 Oct 2014 (estimated)
- Study startSep 2014
- Primary completionAug 2015
- Study completionOct 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (25)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Atopic DermatitisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Regeneron PharmaceuticalsThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 740 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Sanofi
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Clinical Trial Management, Study director, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02260986
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- R668-AD-1224
- Acronym
- CHRONOS
- Status last verified
- Oct 2017
- First submitted
- 6 Oct 2014
- Last updated
- 17 Oct 2017
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Beck LA, Simpson EL, Thaci D, de Bruin-Weller M, Deleuran M, Kataoka Y, Blauvelt A, Wollenberg A, Eichenfield LF, Khokhar FA, Coleman A, Van Spall M, Ma Y, Avetisova E, Zhang A, Nguyen TV. Long-Term Dupilumab Treatment Is Not Associated with an Increased Overall Risk of Infections in Adults with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: Results from an Open-Label 5-Year Extension Study. Adv Ther. 2026 Jul;43(7):2930-2948. doi: 10.1007/s12325-026-03582-8. Epub 2026 Apr 18.
PubMed 41999446Eichenfield LF, Lio PA, Irvine AD, Apfelbacher CJ, Kabashima K, Praestgaard AH, Wang Z, Bastian M. Identifying the Most Relevant Eczema Area and Severity Index Thresholds from the Patient Perspective in Atopic Dermatitis Treatment. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2026 May;27(3):647-656. doi: 10.1007/s40257-026-01017-2. Epub 2026 Apr 17.
PubMed 41996013Simpson EL, Bissonnette R, Deleuran M, Nakahara T, Galus R, de Bruin-Weller M, Coleman A, van Spall M, Chen Z, Avetisova E, Bastian M, Khokhar FA. Dupilumab Treatment Up to 5 Years Shows No Clinically Meaningful Changes in Laboratory Parameters in Adults with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis. Adv Ther. 2026 Mar;43(3):1213-1238. doi: 10.1007/s12325-025-03458-3. Epub 2026 Jan 21.
PubMed 41563707Yosipovitch G, Kim BS, Koo JY, Chen Z, Wiggins S, Zahn J, Sugerman P, Haddad EB, Cyr SL. Dupilumab Reduces Pruritus in Clinically Distinct Dermatologic Diseases: Data from Clinical Trials on Atopic Dermatitis, Prurigo Nodularis, and Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2026 Apr;16(4):1983-1995. doi: 10.1007/s13555-025-01596-8. Epub 2025 Nov 22.
PubMed 41272364Wiseman M, Benvenuto M, Stromkjaer L, Paludan-Muller A, Ryttig L, Petersen AS, Wollenberg A. Cost-Per-Responder Analysis for Tralokinumab and Dupilumab in Combination with Topical Corticosteroids in Patients with Moderate-To-Severe Atopic Dermatitis. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2026 Jan;16(1):265-276. doi: 10.1007/s13555-025-01565-1. Epub 2025 Oct 16.
PubMed 41102518Langley RG, Gherardi G, Coleman A, Ardeleanu M, Rodriguez-Marco A, Levy S, Bansal A, Chen Z, Rossi AB, Shumel B, Khokhar FA. The Safety Data of Dupilumab for the Treatment of Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis in Infants, Children, Adolescents, and Adults. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2025 Nov;26(6):981-1002. doi: 10.1007/s40257-025-00952-w. Epub 2025 Sep 24.
PubMed 40993471Stander S, Yosipovitch G, Kim BS, Steinhoff M, Armstrong A, Legat FJ, Kabashima K, Nakahara T, Igarashi A, Praestgaard AH, Nguyen TV, Bastian M. Optimal Itch Response in Adults Treated with Dupilumab for Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2025 Nov;15(11):3437-3446. doi: 10.1007/s13555-025-01519-7. Epub 2025 Sep 19.
PubMed 40971025Stander S, Yosipovitch G, Simpson EL, Kim BS, Kabashima K, Thaci D, Metz M, Chen Z, Hagen S, Bastian M. Onset and Long-Term Maintenance of Optimal Itch Response in Adult Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis Treated with Dupilumab: Post Hoc Analysis from Two Phase 3 Trials. Adv Ther. 2025 Apr;42(4):1800-1810. doi: 10.1007/s12325-025-03124-8. Epub 2025 Feb 19.
PubMed 39969783Kamal MA, Kosloski MP, Lai CH, Partridge MA, Rajadhyaksha M, Kanamaluru V, Bansal A, Shabbir A, Shumel B, Ardeleanu M, Richards SM, Yan H, Xu CR, Rodriguez-Marco A, Xiao J, Khokhar FA, Gherardi G, Babilonia E, Maloney J, Mortensen E, Akinlade B, Braunstein N, Stahl N, Torri A, Davis JD, DiCioccio AT. Immunogenicity of dupilumab in adult and pediatric patients with atopic dermatitis. Front Immunol. 2024 Nov 11;15:1466372. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1466372. eCollection 2024.
PubMed 39588375Silverberg JI, Lynde CW, Abuabara K, Patruno C, de Benedetto A, Zhang H, Thomas RB, Bego-Le-Bagousse G, Khokhar FA, Vakil J, Marco AR, Levit NA. Efficacy and Safety of Dupilumab Maintained in Adults >/= 60 Years of Age with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: Analysis of Pooled Data from Four Randomized Clinical Trials. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2023 May;24(3):469-483. doi: 10.1007/s40257-022-00754-4. Epub 2023 Feb 20.
PubMed 36808602Paller AS, Silverberg JI, Cork MJ, Guttman-Yassky E, Lockshin B, Irvine AD, Kim MB, Kabashima K, Chen Z, Lu Y, Bansal A, Rossi AB, Shabbir A. Efficacy and Safety of Dupilumab in Patients With Erythrodermic Atopic Dermatitis: A Post Hoc Analysis of 6 Randomized Clinical Trials. JAMA Dermatol. 2023 Mar 1;159(3):255-266. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2022.6192.
PubMed 36723913Wechsler ME, Klion AD, Paggiaro P, Nair P, Staumont-Salle D, Radwan A, Johnson RR, Kapoor U, Khokhar FA, Daizadeh N, Chen Z, Laws E, Ortiz B, Jacob-Nara JA, Mannent LP, Rowe PJ, Deniz Y. Effect of Dupilumab on Blood Eosinophil Counts in Patients With Asthma, Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps, Atopic Dermatitis, or Eosinophilic Esophagitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2022 Oct;10(10):2695-2709. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2022.05.019. Epub 2022 May 28.
PubMed 35636689Blauvelt A, de Bruin-Weller M, Simpson EL, Chen Z, Ardeleanu M, Rossi AB. Consistency of Response to Dupilumab in Adults with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis Over 1 Year. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2022 Jan;12(1):9-13. doi: 10.1007/s13555-021-00657-y. Epub 2022 Jan 7.
PubMed 34994968Blauvelt A, de Bruin-Weller M, Simpson EL, Chen Z, Zhang A, Shumel B. Dupilumab with Topical Corticosteroids Provides Rapid and Sustained Improvement in Adults with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis Across Anatomic Regions Over 52 Weeks. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2022 Jan;12(1):223-231. doi: 10.1007/s13555-021-00638-1. Epub 2021 Nov 22.
PubMed 34806137Griffiths C, de Bruin-Weller M, Deleuran M, Fargnoli MC, Staumont-Salle D, Hong CH, Sanchez-Carazo J, Foley P, Seo SJ, Msihid J, Chen Z, Cyr SL, Rossi AB. Dupilumab in Adults with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis and Prior Use of Systemic Non-Steroidal Immunosuppressants: Analysis of Four Phase 3 Trials. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2021 Aug;11(4):1357-1372. doi: 10.1007/s13555-021-00558-0. Epub 2021 Jun 18.
PubMed 34142350
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Oct 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Demonstrate the Efficacy and Long-Term Safety of Dupilumab in Adult Patients With Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02260986
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CHRONOS / R668-AD-1224
- Conditions
- Atopic Dermatitis
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 740 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Regeneron PharmaceuticalsIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Sanofi
- Study start
- Sep 2014
- Primary completion
- Aug 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- Oct 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 9 Oct 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 17 Oct 2017
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The primary objective of the study was to demonstrate the efficacy of Dupilumab administered concomitantly with topical corticosteroid (TCS) through Week 16 in adult participants with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) compared to placebo administered concomitantly with TCS.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo qw | Experimental | Drug: Placebo (for Dupilumab), Other: Topical Corticosteroid (TCS)Two subcutaneous injections of Placebo (for Dupilumab) as a loading dose on Day 1 followed by a single injection weekly (qw) from Week 1 to Week 51. |
| Dupilumab 300 mg q2w | Experimental | Drug: Dupilumab, Drug: Placebo (for Dupilumab), Other: Topical Corticosteroid (TCS)Two subcutaneous injections of Dupilumab 300 mg (for a total of 600 mg) as a loading dose on Day 1, followed by placebo (for Dupilumab) alternating with single 300 mg injection of Dupilumab every 2 weeks (q2w) from Week 1 to Week 51. During weeks in which Dupilumab was not administered, participants received placebo. |
| Dupilumab 300 mg qw | Experimental | Drug: Dupilumab, Other: Topical Corticosteroid (TCS)Two subcutaneous injections of Dupilumab 300 mg (for a total of 600 mg) as a loading dose on Day 1, followed by a single 300 mg injection of Dupilumab qw from Week 1 to Week 51. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Chronic AD that had been present for at least 3 years before the screening visit;
- Documented recent history (within 6 months before the screening visit) of inadequate response to a sufficient course of out-patient treatment with topical AD medication(s).
Key exclusion criteria (12 listed)
- Participation in a prior Dupilumab clinical trial;
- Important side effects of topical medication (e.g. intolerance to treatment, hypersensitivity reactions, significant skin atrophy, systemic effects), as assessed by the investigator or treating physician;
- Having used any of the following treatments within 4 weeks before the baseline visit, or any condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, was likely to require such treatment(s) during the first 2 weeks of study treatment:
- Treatment with a live (attenuated) vaccine within 12 weeks before the baseline visit;
- History of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection or positive HIV serology at screening;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| DupilumabAlso: REGN668, SAR231893, DupixentSubcutaneous injection in the different quadrants of the abdomen (avoiding navel and waist areas) and upper thighs | Drug | Dupilumab 300 mg q2w, Dupilumab 300 mg qw |
| Placebo (for Dupilumab)Subcutaneous injection in the different quadrants of the abdomen (avoiding navel and waist areas) and upper thighs | Drug | Dupilumab 300 mg q2w, Placebo qw |
| Topical Corticosteroid (TCS)All participants were required to treatment with a (TCS) using a standardized regimen. It was recommended that participants use triamcinolone acetonide 0.1% cream or fluocinolone acetonide 0.025% ointment for medium potency, and hydrocortisone 1% cream for low potency. | Other | Dupilumab 300 mg q2w, Dupilumab 300 mg qw, Placebo qw |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Participants With Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of "0" or "1" and Reduction From Baseline of ≥2 Points at Week 16
Time frame: Baseline to Week 16
IGA is an assessment scale used to determine severity of AD and clinical response to treatment on a 5-point scale (0 = clear; 1 = almost clear; 2 = mild; 3 = moderate; 4 = severe) based on erythema and papulation/infiltration. Therapeutic response is an IGA score of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear). Participants with IGA score "0" or "1" and a reduction from baseline of ≥2 points at Week 16 were reported.
34 secondary outcomes
Percentage of Participants With Eczema Area and Severity Index-75 (EASI-75) (≥75% Improvement From Baseline) at Week 16
Time frame: Baseline to Week 16
Percentage of Participants With Improvement (Reduction ≥4 Points) of Weekly Average of Peak Daily Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score From Baseline to Week 16
Time frame: Baseline to Week 16
Percentage of Participants With Improvement (Reduction ≥3 Points) of Weekly Average of Peak Daily Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score From Baseline to Week 16
Time frame: Baseline to Week 16
Percentage of Participants With Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of "0" or "1" and Reduction From Baseline of ≥2 Points at Week 52
Time frame: Baseline to Week 52
Percentage of Participants With Eczema Area and Severity Index-75 (EASI-75) (≥75% Improvement From Baseline) at Week 52
Time frame: Baseline to Week 52
Percent Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Peak Daily Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score to Week 16
Time frame: Baseline to Week 16
Percentage of Participants With Improvement (Reduction ≥4 Points) of Weekly Average of Peak Daily Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score From Baseline to Week 52
Time frame: Baseline to Week 52
Percentage of Participants With Improvement (Reduction ≥3 Points) of Weekly Average of Peak Daily Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score From Baseline to Week 52
Time frame: Baseline to Week 52
Percentage of Participants With Improvement (Reduction ≥4 Points) of Weekly Average of Peak Daily Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score From Baseline to Week 24
Time frame: Baseline to Week 24
Percentage of Participants With Improvement (Reduction ≥4 Points) of Weekly Average of Peak Daily Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score From Baseline to Week 4
Time frame: Baseline to Week 4
Percentage of Participants With Improvement (Reduction ≥4 Points) of Weekly Average of Peak Daily Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score From Baseline to Week 2
Time frame: Baseline to Week 2
Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Peak Daily Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score to Week 16
Time frame: Baseline to Week 16
Percent Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score to Week 16
Time frame: Baseline to Week 16
Change From Baseline in Percent Body Surface Area (BSA) Affected by Atopic Dermatitis to Week 16
Time frame: Baseline to Week 16
Percent Change From Baseline in the SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) Score to Week 16
Time frame: Baseline to Week 16
Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) to Week 16
Time frame: Baseline to Week 16
Change From Baseline in Patient Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) to Week 16
Time frame: Baseline to Week 16
Change From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (HADS) to Week 16
Time frame: Baseline to Week 16
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Global Individual Signs Score (GISS) to Week 16
Time frame: Baseline to Week 16
Proportion of Topical Atopic Dermatitis Medication-Free Days Through Week 52
Time frame: Baseline to Week 52
Percent Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Peak Daily Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score to Week 2
Time frame: Baseline to Week 2
Percent Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score to Week 52
Time frame: Baseline to Week 52
Change From Baseline in Percent Body Surface Area (BSA) Affected by Atopic Dermatitis to Week 52
Time frame: Baseline to Week 52
Percent Change From Baseline in the SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) Score to Week 52
Time frame: Baseline to Week 52
Percent Change From Baseline in Global Individual Signs Score (GISS) to Week 52
Time frame: Baseline to Week 52
Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) to Week 52
Time frame: Baseline to Week 52
Change From Baseline in Patient Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) to Week 52
Time frame: Baseline to Week 52
Change From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (HADS) to Week 52
Time frame: Baseline to Week 52
Number of Flares Through Week 52
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 52
Number of Serious Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Leading to Study Drug Discontinuation Through Week 52
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 52
Percentage of Participants With Skin Infection Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Excluding Herpetic Infections) From Baseline Through Week 52
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 52
Number of Skin Infection TEAEs (Excluding Herpetic Infections) From Baseline Through Week 52
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 52
Percentage of Participants With Skin Infection Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Excluding Herpetic Infections) Requiring Systemic Treatment From Baseline Through Week 52
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 52
Number of Skin Infection Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Excluding Herpetic Infections) Requiring Systemic Treatment From Baseline Through Week 52
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 52
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Oct 2017.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41999446Beck LA, Simpson EL, Thaci D, de Bruin-Weller M, Deleuran M, Kataoka Y, Blauvelt A, Wollenberg A, Eichenfield LF, Khokhar FA, Coleman A, Van Spall M, Ma Y, Avetisova E, Zhang A, Nguyen TV. Long-Term Dupilumab Treatment Is Not Associated with an Increased Overall Risk of Infections in Adults with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: Results from an Open-Label 5-Year Extension Study. Adv Ther. 2026 Jul;43(7):2930-2948. doi: 10.1007/s12325-026-03582-8. Epub 2026 Apr 18.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41996013Eichenfield LF, Lio PA, Irvine AD, Apfelbacher CJ, Kabashima K, Praestgaard AH, Wang Z, Bastian M. Identifying the Most Relevant Eczema Area and Severity Index Thresholds from the Patient Perspective in Atopic Dermatitis Treatment. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2026 May;27(3):647-656. doi: 10.1007/s40257-026-01017-2. Epub 2026 Apr 17.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41563707Simpson EL, Bissonnette R, Deleuran M, Nakahara T, Galus R, de Bruin-Weller M, Coleman A, van Spall M, Chen Z, Avetisova E, Bastian M, Khokhar FA. Dupilumab Treatment Up to 5 Years Shows No Clinically Meaningful Changes in Laboratory Parameters in Adults with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis. Adv Ther. 2026 Mar;43(3):1213-1238. doi: 10.1007/s12325-025-03458-3. Epub 2026 Jan 21.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41272364Yosipovitch G, Kim BS, Koo JY, Chen Z, Wiggins S, Zahn J, Sugerman P, Haddad EB, Cyr SL. Dupilumab Reduces Pruritus in Clinically Distinct Dermatologic Diseases: Data from Clinical Trials on Atopic Dermatitis, Prurigo Nodularis, and Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2026 Apr;16(4):1983-1995. doi: 10.1007/s13555-025-01596-8. Epub 2025 Nov 22.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41102518Wiseman M, Benvenuto M, Stromkjaer L, Paludan-Muller A, Ryttig L, Petersen AS, Wollenberg A. Cost-Per-Responder Analysis for Tralokinumab and Dupilumab in Combination with Topical Corticosteroids in Patients with Moderate-To-Severe Atopic Dermatitis. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2026 Jan;16(1):265-276. doi: 10.1007/s13555-025-01565-1. Epub 2025 Oct 16.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40993471Langley RG, Gherardi G, Coleman A, Ardeleanu M, Rodriguez-Marco A, Levy S, Bansal A, Chen Z, Rossi AB, Shumel B, Khokhar FA. The Safety Data of Dupilumab for the Treatment of Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis in Infants, Children, Adolescents, and Adults. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2025 Nov;26(6):981-1002. doi: 10.1007/s40257-025-00952-w. Epub 2025 Sep 24.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40971025Stander S, Yosipovitch G, Kim BS, Steinhoff M, Armstrong A, Legat FJ, Kabashima K, Nakahara T, Igarashi A, Praestgaard AH, Nguyen TV, Bastian M. Optimal Itch Response in Adults Treated with Dupilumab for Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2025 Nov;15(11):3437-3446. doi: 10.1007/s13555-025-01519-7. Epub 2025 Sep 19.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39969783Stander S, Yosipovitch G, Simpson EL, Kim BS, Kabashima K, Thaci D, Metz M, Chen Z, Hagen S, Bastian M. Onset and Long-Term Maintenance of Optimal Itch Response in Adult Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis Treated with Dupilumab: Post Hoc Analysis from Two Phase 3 Trials. Adv Ther. 2025 Apr;42(4):1800-1810. doi: 10.1007/s12325-025-03124-8. Epub 2025 Feb 19.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39588375Kamal MA, Kosloski MP, Lai CH, Partridge MA, Rajadhyaksha M, Kanamaluru V, Bansal A, Shabbir A, Shumel B, Ardeleanu M, Richards SM, Yan H, Xu CR, Rodriguez-Marco A, Xiao J, Khokhar FA, Gherardi G, Babilonia E, Maloney J, Mortensen E, Akinlade B, Braunstein N, Stahl N, Torri A, Davis JD, DiCioccio AT. Immunogenicity of dupilumab in adult and pediatric patients with atopic dermatitis. Front Immunol. 2024 Nov 11;15:1466372. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1466372. eCollection 2024.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36808602Silverberg JI, Lynde CW, Abuabara K, Patruno C, de Benedetto A, Zhang H, Thomas RB, Bego-Le-Bagousse G, Khokhar FA, Vakil J, Marco AR, Levit NA. Efficacy and Safety of Dupilumab Maintained in Adults >/= 60 Years of Age with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: Analysis of Pooled Data from Four Randomized Clinical Trials. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2023 May;24(3):469-483. doi: 10.1007/s40257-022-00754-4. Epub 2023 Feb 20.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36723913Paller AS, Silverberg JI, Cork MJ, Guttman-Yassky E, Lockshin B, Irvine AD, Kim MB, Kabashima K, Chen Z, Lu Y, Bansal A, Rossi AB, Shabbir A. Efficacy and Safety of Dupilumab in Patients With Erythrodermic Atopic Dermatitis: A Post Hoc Analysis of 6 Randomized Clinical Trials. JAMA Dermatol. 2023 Mar 1;159(3):255-266. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2022.6192.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 35636689Wechsler ME, Klion AD, Paggiaro P, Nair P, Staumont-Salle D, Radwan A, Johnson RR, Kapoor U, Khokhar FA, Daizadeh N, Chen Z, Laws E, Ortiz B, Jacob-Nara JA, Mannent LP, Rowe PJ, Deniz Y. Effect of Dupilumab on Blood Eosinophil Counts in Patients With Asthma, Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps, Atopic Dermatitis, or Eosinophilic Esophagitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2022 Oct;10(10):2695-2709. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2022.05.019. Epub 2022 May 28.
Related trials for Atopic Dermatitis
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
A Phase I Study of GLR2053 Tablets in Chinese Healthy Adult Participants
Atopic Dermatitis
RecruitingObservational study
Blood, Urine, and Tissue Collection for Cutaneous Lymphoma, Eczema, and Atopic Dermatitis Research
Cutaneous T-cell Lymphoma, Sezary Syndrome
RecruitingPhase 1
First-in-Human Trial to Assess REGN20423 in Healthy Adult Participants and Adult Participants With Atopic Dermatitis
Healthy Volunteer, Atopic Dermatitis
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
A Study of HSK60002 Tablets in Participants With Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis
Dermatitis Atopic
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Learn About the Study Medicine Called Tilrekimig in People With Moderate-to Severe Eczema
Atopic Dermatitis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Clinical Trial Management study director
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
148 sites in 14 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Dupilumab and Topical Corticosteroid (TCS) in people with Atopic Dermatitis, run by Regeneron Pharmaceuticals at 148 sites in 14 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Oct 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 148 sites in United States, Japan, Canada, Poland, United Kingdom and 9 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 17 Oct 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Participants With Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of "0" or "1" and Reduction From Baseline of ≥2 Points at Week 16 (time frame: Baseline to Week 16). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02260986, which also lists 25 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Oct 2017.