AzTrials
AzTrials

Pulmonary Embolism With FeverNCT02261610

Pulmonary Embolism and PCT. PE-PCT Study

A study testing Procalcitonin algorithm in people with Pulmonary Embolism With Fever, run by University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand at 1 site in France.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The clinical manifestations of pulmonary embolism vary greatly from the absence of specific clinical symptoms to cardiogenic shock or cardiac arrest. Clinical form of EP represented by "lung superinfection", also called "pulmonary embolism superinfected" is common and represents up to 30% of initial clinical… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Pulmonary Embolism With Fever
What is being tested?
Procalcitonin algorithm
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
18 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
26 Nov 2014to 24 Nov 2019
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age over 18 years
  • CT diagnosis of pulmonary embolism
  • Temperature> 37.8 ° C
  • About affiliated to the social security
  • Prior agreement with the patient signing a consent

Who cannot join

  • Pregnant Woman
  • Refusal of the patient
  • Pulmonary Neoplasia
  • Antibiotic ongoing for more than 24 hours at the time of diagnosis of pulmonary embolism
  • Cardiogenic shock (hypotension with mean arterial pressure less than 65 bpm)
  • Suspicion of infection other than lung associated (associated urinary tract infection, prostatitis, ENT infection, sinusitis ...)
  • Patient under guardianship
  • Patients unable to give consent

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

France1 site
  • CHU Clermont-Ferrand

    Clermont-Ferrand, 63003

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: Interest of PCT in the Management of Antibiotic for the Patient With a Febrile Pulmonary Embolism.

The clinical manifestations of pulmonary embolism vary greatly from the absence of specific clinical symptoms to cardiogenic shock or cardiac arrest. Clinical form of EP represented by "lung superinfection", also called "pulmonary embolism superinfected" is common and represents up to 30% of initial clinical presentations; she been few evaluations in clinical research. The reality of the bacterial infection remains controversial and the clinical presentation often leads to the prescription of empirical antibiotic therapy, often unnecessary in many cases. Number of antibiotic prescriptions are probably inappropriate.

Fever has long been recognized as a sign associated with pulmonary embolism. Stein et al reported a temperature above 37.5 ° C on 50% of patients with acute pulmonary embolism without actually clarified whether this was related to temperature with a pulmonary embolism or other associated cause. Murray et al estimated that greater than 38 ° C was explained by pulmonary embolism in 57.1% of patients while in the PIOPED study, only 14% of patients had fever with no other cause identified as pulmonary embolism. Fever due to pulmonary embolism is often low intensity (often less than 38.3) and of short duration, with a peak on the day of pulmonary embolism and a gradual decrease of about 1 week. The pathophysiology of fever in pulmonary embolism has not yet was completely clarified. It is suggested that a combination of several factors involved pyrogenic myocardial tissue necrosis and releasing pro-inflammatory cytokines, hemorrhage, vascular irritation or inflammation, atelectasis or local superinfection.

Read more

Since 2004, the PCT has become a marker helping the initiation of antibiotic therapy in patients with community-acquired pneumonia. This is especially verified in patients admitted for acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive bronchitis. In the latter case, the use of PCT reduces inappropriate antibiotic prescribing. Thus helping the clinician by measuring biomarkers such as PCT is based on writing an algorithm leading or not to use antibiotics.

The use of an algorithm involving the PCT could just as for infectious pneumonia or COPD, of interest in the febrile pulmonary embolism to distinguish febrile forms related to bacterial infections febrile forms of EP to other causes.

Read the detailed description

The investigators propose to realize a single-center prospective, randomized, parallel group, to compare two groups of patients admitted with febrile pulmonary embolism . In the first group of patients, the use of antibiotics will be guided by clinical (clinical group). In the second group, the use of antibiotics will be guided by the algorithm (PCT group). The guided by the PCT algorithm is only given aid the clinician in the therapeutic management without its application only requires the doctor in charge of the patient. So if your doctor may advocate (or deemed necessary) to continue (or start) antibiotics even if the PCT algorithm would allow him to stop (or not initiate).

Being tested
Procalcitonin algorithm
Keywords
PCT algorithm, Antibiotic, Pulmonary embolism
Medical subject headings
Pulmonary Embolism

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Procalcitonin algorithmProcedure or surgery

    Procalcitonin algorithm (usually used for lower respiratory tract) guide antibiotic therapy

Study groups in NCT02261610
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
clinical groupExperimentalIn the first group of patients, the use of antibiotics will be guided by clinical (clinical group).
Receives: Procedure: Procalcitonin algorithm
PCT groupOtherIn the second group, the use of antibiotics will be guided by the algorithm (PCT group).
Receives: Procedure: Procalcitonin algorithm

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of patient treated by antibiotics in each group

    Measured: at day 1

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Percentage of death

    Measured: at day 1

  2. Percentage of antibiotics stop

    Measured: at day 1

  3. Rate of new hospitalization during the following month

    Measured: at 1 month

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted10 Oct 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study start26 Nov 2014
  3. Primary completion24 Jul 2019
  4. Study completion24 Nov 2019

Why it stopped: difficulty of recrutement

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
18 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02261610
Sponsor's protocol ID
CHU-0203
Other IDs
2014-A00046-41
Status last verified
Nov 2020
First submitted
5 Sep 2014
Last updated
5 Apr 2021
Results posted
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Procalcitonin algorithm in people with Pulmonary Embolism With Fever, run by University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Apr 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was stopped early (reason given: difficulty of recrutement). Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of patient treated by antibiotics in each group (time frame: at day 1). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Apr 2021.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in