Chronic Low Back PainPhase 2NCT02262754
PF-06372865 In Subjects With Chronic Low Back Pain
A Phase 2 study testing PF-06372865 and Naproxen in people with Chronic Low Back Pain, run by Pfizer at 46 sites in United States.
Trial summary
PF-06372865 In Subjects With Chronic Low Back Pain Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Chronic Low Back Pain
- What is being tested?
- PF-06372865 and Naproxen
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 302 participants
- Where
- 46 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Oct 2014to Aug 2015
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- -
Who cannot join
- -
Trial locations and contacts
46 sites in 1 country.
46 sites in 1 country
United States46 sites
Global Research
Anaheim, California, 92804
Better Health Clinical Research, Inc.
Atlanta, Georgia, 30344
River Birch Research Alliance, LLC
Blue Ridge, Georgia, 30513
Boston Clinical Trials
Boston, Massachusetts, 02131
Chicago Anesthesia Associates
Chicago, Illinois, 60657
Family Medicine center
Columbus, Georgia, 31901
Columbus Regional Research Institute
Columbus, Georgia, 31904
Avail Clinical Research, LLC
DeLand, Florida, 32720
Altoona Center for Clinical Research
Duncansville, Pennsylvania, 16635
S&W Clinical Research
Fort Lauderdale, Florida, 33306
Neuro-Pain Medical Center
Fresno, California, 93710
Florida Research Network, LLC
Gainesville, Florida, 32605
Drug Trials America
Hartsdale, New York, 10530
Broward Research Group
Hollywood, Florida, 33024
Clinical Trial Network
Houston, Texas, 77074
CRC of Jackson
Jackson, Mississippi, 39202
Physician's Surgery Center
Jackson, Mississippi, 39202
Jacksonville Center for Clinical Research
Jacksonville, Florida, 32216
Centex Studies, Inc
Lake Charles, Louisiana, 70601
Drug Studies America
Marietta, Georgia, 30060
Agave Clinical Research, LLC
Mesa, Arizona, 85202
ActivMed Practices & Research, Inc.
Methuen, Massachusetts, 01844
Better Health Clinical Research, Inc./Georgia Pain & Spine Care, Inc.
Newnan, Georgia, 30265
Better Health Clinical Research, Inc.
Newnan, Georgia, 30265
National Clinical Research - Norfolk, Inc.
Norfolk, Virginia, 23502
Providence Clinical Research
North Hollywood, California, 91606
Compass Research, LLC
Orlando, Florida, 32806
Pines Clinical Research Inc.
Pembroke Pines, Florida, 33028
Arizona Research Center, Inc.
Phoenix, Arizona, 85023
Accord Clinical Research, LLC
Port Orange, Florida, 32129
Summit Research Network (Oregon), Inc.
Portland, Oregon, 97210
Wake Internal Medicine Consultants, Inc.
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27612
Wake Research Associates, LLC
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27612
AAIR Research Center
Rochester, New York, 14618
Lee Medical Associates, PA
San Antonio, Texas, 78229
Progressive Clinical Research
San Antonio, Texas, 78229
Southeast Regional Research Group
Savannah, Georgia, 31405
Summit Research Network (Seattle) LLC
Seattle, Washington, 98104
Arthritis & Rheumatic Care Center
South Miami, Florida, 33143
Miami Research Associates
South Miami, Florida, 33143
Stamford Therapeutics Consortium
Stamford, Connecticut, 06905
Omega Medical Research
Warwick, Rhode Island, 02886
Elite Clinical Trials, Incorporate
Wildomar, California, 92595
The Center for Clinical Research
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27103
North Georgia Clinical Research
Woodstock, Georgia, 30189
North Georgia Internal medicine
Woodstock, Georgia, 30189
About this study
Official title: A Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo- And Active-controlled, 4 Week, Multi-center, Parallel Group Study Assessing The Analgesic Effect, Safety And Tolerability Of Pf-06372865 In Subjects With Chronic Low Back Pain Using Naproxen As Positive Control
PF-06372865 In Subjects With Chronic Low Back Pain
- Conditions
- Chronic Low Back Pain
- Being tested
- PF-06372865, Placebo, Naproxen
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
PF-06372865Drug
Dose level 1 daily dosing BID for 1 week followed by dose level 2 daily BID for 3 weeks
PlaceboDrug
Placebo for PF-06372865 and placebo for naproxen daily
NaproxenDrug
500 mg BID for 4 weeks
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| PF-06372865 | Experimental | Daily BID dosing for 4 weeks Receives: Drug: PF-06372865 |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Daily BID dosing for 4 weeks Receives: Drug: Placebo |
| Naproxen | Active comparator | Daily BID dosing for 4 weeks Receives: Drug: Naproxen |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change From Baseline in Daily Low Back Pain Intensity (LBPI) Score as Measured by an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Week 4
Daily average low back pain was assessed on an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS). Participants described their average low back pain during the past 24 hours on a scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicate higher pain. Baseline value was calculated as the mean of the scores over the last 7 days in the placebo run-in period, prior to randomization. Post-baseline weekly scores were calculated based on the mean of the scores over the 7 days prior to and including the day at the end of the corresponding week.
Measured: Baseline, Week 4
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study treatment without regard to possibility of causal relationship. The SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death, initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization, life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying), persistent or significant disability or incapacity, congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study drug and up to 28 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. AEs included both serious and non-serious adverse events.
Measured: Baseline up to 28 days after the last dose of study treatment (Day 56)
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities
Abnormality criteria included: hemoglobin, hematocrit and red blood cells (RBCs) (less than [<] 0.8*lower limit of normal [LLN]); white blood cells (WBC) (<0.6*LLN, greater than [>] 1.5*upper limit of normal [ULN]); MCV, MCH, MCHC (<0.9*LLN, >1.1*ULN); platelets (<0.5*LLN>, >1.75*ULN); neutrophils, lymphocytes(<0.8*LLN, >1.2*ULN); eosinophils, basophils, monocytes (>1.2*ULN); total bilirubin (>1.5*ULN); aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase (>3*ULN); total protein, albumin (<0.8*LLN, >1.2*ULN); creatinine, blood urea nitrogen (>1.3*ULN); glucose (<0.6*LLN, >1.5*ULN); uric acid (>1.2*ULN); sodium, potassium, chloride, calcium, bicarbonate (<0.9*LLN, >1.1*ULN); urine pH (<4.5, >8); qualitative urine glucose, ketones, protein, blood values (greater than or equal to [>=] 1) in urine dipstick test; urine RBC, WBC (>=20); hyaline casts (>1), bacteria (>20).
Measured: Baseline up to 28 days after the last dose of study treatment (Day 56)
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Abnormalities
Participants who met the criteria for abnormal findings in vital signs data were reported. Criteria for abnormalities in vital signs: supine systolic blood pressure (SBP) <90 millimeter of mercury (mmHg), supine diastolic BP (DBP) <50 mmHg, supine pulse rate <40 beats per minute (bpm) or >120 bpm. Maximum increase or decrease from baseline in supine SBP >=30 mmHg and maximum increase or decrease from baseline in supine DBP >=20 mmHg.
Measured: Baseline up to Follow-up (44 days)
Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities
Participants with abnormal ECG findings were reported. Criteria for potential clinical concern in ECG parameters: maximum (max.) PR interval of >=300 milliseconds (msec), maximum QRS interval >=140 msec, maximum QTCF interval (Fridericia's Correction) of 450 to <480 msec, 480 to <500 msec and >=500 msec, maximum of >=25 percent (%) increase from baseline (IFB) value of >200 msec and >=50% for baseline value of less than or equal to (<=) 200 msec for PR interval, maximum increase from baseline of >=50% for QRS interval, maximum increase from baseline of >=30 msec to <60 msec and maximum increase from baseline of >60 msec in QTCF interval (Fridericia's Correction).
Measured: Baseline up to Follow-up (44 days)
Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)
The C-SSRS (mapped to Columbia Classification Algorithm of Suicide Assessment [C-CASA]) is an interview-based rating scale to systematically assess suicidal ideation and suicidal behavior. C-SSRS assessed whether participant experienced following: completed suicide =1, suicide attempt =2 (response of "Yes" on "actual attempt"), preparatory acts toward imminent suicidal behavior =3 ("Yes" on "preparatory acts or behavior"), suicidal ideation =4 ("Yes" on "wish to be dead", "non-specific active suicidal thoughts", "active suicidal ideation with methods without intent to act or some intent to act, without specific plan or with specific plan and intent), any suicidal behavior or ideation, self-injurious behavior =7 ("Yes" on "Has participant engaged in non-suicidal self-injurious behavior").
Measured: Screening, Baseline, Week 1, 2, 3, 4
Change From End of Treatment Visit in Physician's Withdrawal Checklist (PWC) Score at Follow-up Visit
PWC is a 20 item physician rated interview to measure anxiolytic drug withdrawal-related signs and symptoms. Each individual item score ranges from 0 (not present) to 3 (severe), where higher scores = more affected condition. PWC total score range from 0 (not present) to 60 (severe), where higher score = more affected condition. Change: score at follow-up visit minus score at the end of treatment visit.
Measured: End of treatment (Day 30), follow-up (Day 44)
Secondary outcomes (17)
Change From Baseline in Daily Low Back Pain Intensity (LBPI) as Measured by an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Week 1, 2 3 and 4
Average back pain was assessed with an 11-point NRS ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain. Participants described their average low back pain during the past 24 hours by choosing the appropriate number from 0 to 10.
Measured: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 3, 4
Percent Change From Baseline in Daily Low Back Pain Intensity (LBPI) as Measured by an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Week 1, 2, 3 and 4
Average back pain was assessed with an 11-point NRS ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain. Participants described their average low back pain during the past 24 hours by choosing the appropriate number from 0 to 10.
Measured: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 3, 4
Number of Participants With Sustained Response Rates in Daily Average LBPI NRS Scores at Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 30 Percent and >=50 Percent Reduction From Baseline
Average back pain was assessed with an 11-point NRS ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain. Participants described their average low back pain during the past 24 hours by choosing the appropriate number from 0 to 10. Percentage of reduction from baseline in the daily average LBPI NRS score was calculated as: ([daily value - baseline value] divided by baseline value) multiplied by 100. Number of participants with sustained response rates (for a minimum of 4 consecutive days) in the daily average LBPI NRS scores that were at >=30 percent and >=50 percent reduced from baseline were reported.
Measured: Baseline up to Week 4
Number of Participants Withdrawn Due to Lack of Efficacy
Participants withdrew from the study due to lack of efficacy (insufficient clinical response) were reported.
Measured: Baseline up to Week 4
Time to Withdrawal Due to Lack of Efficacy
Kaplan Meier and Cox Proportional Hazards analyses were to be used to compute the time to withdrawal due to lack of efficacy. Withdrawal due to lack of efficacy was identified from the participant summary case report form (CRF) page and where reason was identified as "Insufficient Clinical Response". Time to withdrawal was calculated as Date of withdrawal - Date of Randomization.
Measured: Baseline up to Week 4
Number of Participants Using Rescue Medication
Participants were permitted to use any commercial product (tablet/caplet/capsule) of acetaminophen (paracetamol) 500 mg as a rescue medication. Number of participants who used rescue medication were reported.
Measured: Week 1, 2, 3, 4
Number of Days Participants Used the Rescue Medication
The number of days for which the participants used the rescue medication were reported. Participants recorded the usage of acetaminophen rescue medication in the daily diary.
Measured: Week 1, 2, 3, 4
Amount of Rescue Medication Used by the Participants
The amount of rescue medication (Acetaminophen [paracetamol]) used was reported. Participants were permitted to use any commercial product of acetaminophen tablet/caplet/capsule.
Measured: Week 1, 2, 3, 4
Change From Baseline in Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) Total Score at Week 1, 2, and 3
Each participant assessed his or her own disability due to low back pain using the RMDQ worksheet. The RMDQ total score was calculated as the total number of statements that were checked; the RMDQ total possible scores ranges from 0 to 24, with higher scores indicating greater disability.
Measured: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 3
Change From Baseline in Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) Total Score at Week 4
Each participant assessed his or her own disability due to low back pain using the RMDQ worksheet. The RMDQ total score was calculated as the total number of statements that were checked; the RMDQ total possible scores ranges from 0 to 24, with higher scores indicating greater disability.
Measured: Baseline, Week 4
Change From Baseline in Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R) at Week 2 and 4
This test assesses verbal learning and memory. Participants are given a list of 12 words and asked to repeat as many words as they can recall during 3 separate learning trials. The total recall score ranges from 0 (no memory) to 36 (best memory) while the delayed recall trial score ranges from 0 (no memory) to 12 (best memory); higher scores indicated greater verbal learning and recall.
Measured: Baseline, Week 2, Week 4
Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP) Responder Index Analysis
Participants were successful responders if they had any of the following: >=30 percent reduction in mean daily average LBPI from baseline to particular week; decrease of >=30 percent in participant's global assessment of low back pain (disease activity) from baseline to particular week or no worsening (increase) in RMDQ total score from baseline to particular week.
Measured: Week 1, 2, 3, 4
Change From Baseline in Participant's Global Assessment (PtGA) of Low Back Pain Score at Week 1, 2, 3 and 4
Participant rated 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 4 (worst possible pain) with a higher score indicating greater level of pain.
Measured: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 3, 4
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score
PGI-C was a participant rated instrument to measure participant's assessment of change in his or her overall status since the previous visit on a 7-point scale; ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse), where higher scores indicated more worsening.
Measured: Week 1, 2, 3, 4
Number of Participants With Global Evaluation of Study Medication (GESM) at Week 4
Participants rated their study treatment by GESM questionnaire. It was a qualitative measure of efficacy utilizing a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (poor) to 4 (excellent), where higher score indicated a better overall response to the treatment. Number of participants who reported a particular score had been reported.
Measured: Week 4
Plasma Concentration of PF-06372865
Data was calculated by setting concentration values below the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) to zero. The LLOQ was <0.0100 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL).
Measured: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 3, 4
Plasma Concentration of Naproxen
Data was calculated by setting concentration values below the LLOQ to zero. The LLOQ was <1000 ng/mL.
Measured: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 3, 4
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Oct 2014 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2014
- Primary completionAug 2015
- Study completionAug 2015
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Chronic Low Back PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by PfizerThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 302 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Pfizer
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Pfizer CT.gov Call Center, Study director, Pfizer
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02262754
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- B7431006
- Status last verified
- Nov 2016
- First submitted
- 9 Oct 2014
- Last updated
- 4 Jan 2017
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Jan 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo- And Active-controlled, 4 Week, Multi-center, Parallel Group Study Assessing The Analgesic Effect, Safety And Tolerability Of Pf-06372865 In Subjects With Chronic Low Back Pain Using Naproxen As Positive Control
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02262754
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- B7431006
- Conditions
- Chronic Low Back Pain
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 302 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- PfizerIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Oct 2014
- Primary completion
- Aug 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- Aug 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 13 Oct 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 4 Jan 2017
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
PF-06372865 In Subjects With Chronic Low Back Pain
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| PF-06372865 | Experimental | Drug: PF-06372865Daily BID dosing for 4 weeks |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: PlaceboDaily BID dosing for 4 weeks |
| Naproxen | Active comparator | Drug: NaproxenDaily BID dosing for 4 weeks |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- -
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- -
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| PF-06372865Dose level 1 daily dosing BID for 1 week followed by dose level 2 daily BID for 3 weeks | Drug | PF-06372865 |
| PlaceboPlacebo for PF-06372865 and placebo for naproxen daily | Drug | Placebo |
| Naproxen500 mg BID for 4 weeks | Drug | Naproxen |
Primary outcome
Change From Baseline in Daily Low Back Pain Intensity (LBPI) Score as Measured by an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Week 4
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4
Daily average low back pain was assessed on an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS). Participants described their average low back pain during the past 24 hours on a scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicate higher pain. Baseline value was calculated as the mean of the scores over the last 7 days in the placebo run-in period, prior to randomization. Post-baseline weekly scores were calculated based on the mean of the scores over the 7 days prior to and including the day at the end of the corresponding week.
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Time frame: Baseline up to 28 days after the last dose of study treatment (Day 56)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study treatment without regard to possibility of causal relationship. The SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death, initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization, life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying), persistent or significant disability or incapacity, congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study drug and up to 28 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. AEs included both serious and non-serious adverse events.
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities
Time frame: Baseline up to 28 days after the last dose of study treatment (Day 56)
Abnormality criteria included: hemoglobin, hematocrit and red blood cells (RBCs) (less than [<] 0.8*lower limit of normal [LLN]); white blood cells (WBC) (<0.6*LLN, greater than [>] 1.5*upper limit of normal [ULN]); MCV, MCH, MCHC (<0.9*LLN, >1.1*ULN); platelets (<0.5*LLN>, >1.75*ULN); neutrophils, lymphocytes(<0.8*LLN, >1.2*ULN); eosinophils, basophils, monocytes (>1.2*ULN); total bilirubin (>1.5*ULN); aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase (>3*ULN); total protein, albumin (<0.8*LLN, >1.2*ULN); creatinine, blood urea nitrogen (>1.3*ULN); glucose (<0.6*LLN, >1.5*ULN); uric acid (>1.2*ULN); sodium, potassium, chloride, calcium, bicarbonate (<0.9*LLN, >1.1*ULN); urine pH (<4.5, >8); qualitative urine glucose, ketones, protein, blood values (greater than or equal to [>=] 1) in urine dipstick test; urine RBC, WBC (>=20); hyaline casts (>1), bacteria (>20).
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Abnormalities
Time frame: Baseline up to Follow-up (44 days)
Participants who met the criteria for abnormal findings in vital signs data were reported. Criteria for abnormalities in vital signs: supine systolic blood pressure (SBP) <90 millimeter of mercury (mmHg), supine diastolic BP (DBP) <50 mmHg, supine pulse rate <40 beats per minute (bpm) or >120 bpm. Maximum increase or decrease from baseline in supine SBP >=30 mmHg and maximum increase or decrease from baseline in supine DBP >=20 mmHg.
Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities
Time frame: Baseline up to Follow-up (44 days)
Participants with abnormal ECG findings were reported. Criteria for potential clinical concern in ECG parameters: maximum (max.) PR interval of >=300 milliseconds (msec), maximum QRS interval >=140 msec, maximum QTCF interval (Fridericia's Correction) of 450 to <480 msec, 480 to <500 msec and >=500 msec, maximum of >=25 percent (%) increase from baseline (IFB) value of >200 msec and >=50% for baseline value of less than or equal to (<=) 200 msec for PR interval, maximum increase from baseline of >=50% for QRS interval, maximum increase from baseline of >=30 msec to <60 msec and maximum increase from baseline of >60 msec in QTCF interval (Fridericia's Correction).
Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)
Time frame: Screening, Baseline, Week 1, 2, 3, 4
The C-SSRS (mapped to Columbia Classification Algorithm of Suicide Assessment [C-CASA]) is an interview-based rating scale to systematically assess suicidal ideation and suicidal behavior. C-SSRS assessed whether participant experienced following: completed suicide =1, suicide attempt =2 (response of "Yes" on "actual attempt"), preparatory acts toward imminent suicidal behavior =3 ("Yes" on "preparatory acts or behavior"), suicidal ideation =4 ("Yes" on "wish to be dead", "non-specific active suicidal thoughts", "active suicidal ideation with methods without intent to act or some intent to act, without specific plan or with specific plan and intent), any suicidal behavior or ideation, self-injurious behavior =7 ("Yes" on "Has participant engaged in non-suicidal self-injurious behavior").
Change From End of Treatment Visit in Physician's Withdrawal Checklist (PWC) Score at Follow-up Visit
Time frame: End of treatment (Day 30), follow-up (Day 44)
PWC is a 20 item physician rated interview to measure anxiolytic drug withdrawal-related signs and symptoms. Each individual item score ranges from 0 (not present) to 3 (severe), where higher scores = more affected condition. PWC total score range from 0 (not present) to 60 (severe), where higher score = more affected condition. Change: score at follow-up visit minus score at the end of treatment visit.
17 secondary outcomes
Change From Baseline in Daily Low Back Pain Intensity (LBPI) as Measured by an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Week 1, 2 3 and 4
Time frame: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 3, 4
Percent Change From Baseline in Daily Low Back Pain Intensity (LBPI) as Measured by an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Week 1, 2, 3 and 4
Time frame: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 3, 4
Number of Participants With Sustained Response Rates in Daily Average LBPI NRS Scores at Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 30 Percent and >=50 Percent Reduction From Baseline
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 4
Number of Participants Withdrawn Due to Lack of Efficacy
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 4
Time to Withdrawal Due to Lack of Efficacy
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 4
Number of Participants Using Rescue Medication
Time frame: Week 1, 2, 3, 4
Number of Days Participants Used the Rescue Medication
Time frame: Week 1, 2, 3, 4
Amount of Rescue Medication Used by the Participants
Time frame: Week 1, 2, 3, 4
Change From Baseline in Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) Total Score at Week 1, 2, and 3
Time frame: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 3
Change From Baseline in Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) Total Score at Week 4
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4
Change From Baseline in Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R) at Week 2 and 4
Time frame: Baseline, Week 2, Week 4
Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP) Responder Index Analysis
Time frame: Week 1, 2, 3, 4
Change From Baseline in Participant's Global Assessment (PtGA) of Low Back Pain Score at Week 1, 2, 3 and 4
Time frame: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 3, 4
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score
Time frame: Week 1, 2, 3, 4
Number of Participants With Global Evaluation of Study Medication (GESM) at Week 4
Time frame: Week 4
Plasma Concentration of PF-06372865
Time frame: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 3, 4
Plasma Concentration of Naproxen
Time frame: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 3, 4
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Jan 2017.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- To obtain contact information for a study center near you, click here.Link provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Chronic Low Back Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Lumbar Stabilization Exercises With and Without YTWL (Scapular Stabilization Exercises) on Reducing Chronic Low Back Pain and Related Disability. A Randomized Clinical Trial,
Chronic Non Specific Mechanical Low Back Pain
Not yet recruiting
Comparing Non-Medicine Strategies for Improving Low Back Pain
Chronic Low-back Pain (cLBP), High-Impact Chronic Pain (HICP)
Not yet recruiting
Spinery Basivertebral Nerve Ablation for Vertebrogenic Chronic Low Back Pain
Low Back Pain, Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP)
Enrolling by invitation
Effects of 3-dimensional Versus Dynamic Myofascial Release Techniques With Lumbar Mobilization and Exercise Therapy Program in Chronic Non-specific Low Back Pain.
Chronic Non-Specific Low Back Pain, Myofascial Release
RecruitingPhase 2
A Master Protocol Study (LY900028) of Multiple Intervention-Specific-Appendices (ISAs) in Participants With Chronic Pain
Osteoarthritis, Knee, Diabetic Neuropathic Pain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Pfizer CT.gov Call Center study director
Pfizer
46 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing PF-06372865 and Naproxen in people with Chronic Low Back Pain, run by Pfizer at 46 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Jan 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 46 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 4 Jan 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change From Baseline in Daily Low Back Pain Intensity (LBPI) Score as Measured by an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Week 4 (time frame: Baseline, Week 4). The study lists 7 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Jan 2017.