Metastatic Breast CancerPhase 2EG_PGNCT02263495
Eribulin Plus Gemcitabine (EG) vs Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine (PG) in HER2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer
A Phase 2 study testing Paclitaxel, Eribulin and Gemcitabine in people with Metastatic Breast Cancer, run by Asan Medical Center at 2 sites in South Korea.
Trial summary
Metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is an incurable disease and is needed to improve effective chemotherapy. Paclitaxel plus Gemcitabine (PG) combination chemotherapy is one of the preferred chemotherapeutic regimens for patients with MBC, and was found to be proper as a maintenance chemotherapy regimen with survival… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 19 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Metastatic Breast Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Paclitaxel, Eribulin and Gemcitabine
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 118 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesSouth Korea
- Study dates
- 19 Dec 2014to 17 Jun 2019
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 19 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Histologically confirmed metastatic, or recurrent breast cancer
- HER2-negative breast cancer
- age > 18 years
- ECOG performance status 0 - 2
- Pre- or postmenopausal breast cancer patients with measurable or non-measurable lesions, who are candidates for chemotherapy
- Life expectancy ≥ 3 months
Show all 16Show fewer
- No prior history of chemotherapy for metastatic, recurrent breast cancer
- Patients may have received prior neoadjuvant or adjuvant taxane regimen as long as it has been 12 months since completion of regimen.
- Patients either may or may not have a prior anthracycline containing regimen.
- Prior hormonal therapy as a treatment of metastatic disease is allowed. But antitumoral hormonal therapy must be terminated prior to enrollment(up to the date of randomization)
- Prior radiation therapy allowed as long as < 25% of the bone marrow has been treated, and the patients must have recovered from the acute toxic effects of the treatment prior to study enrollment. Prior radiation to the whole pelvis is not allowed. Prior radiotherapy must be completed 2 weeks before study entry.
- Bisphosphonates for the treatment of bone metastases should not be initiated following the first dose of randomized therapy. It must be initiated prior to day of treatment (cycle 1, day 1). Patients may continue on bisphosphonates who already established on bisphosphonate therapy for bone metastases
- Adequate bone marrow function (≥ ANC 1,500/ul, ≥ platelet 100,000/ul, ≥ Hemoglobin 9.0 g/dl)
- Adequate renal function (≤ serum creatinine 1.5 mg/dl or CCr ≥ 50 ml/min)
- Adequate liver function (≤ serum bilirubin 1.5 mg/dl, ≤ AST \& ALTX3 upper normal limit or AST and ALT ≤ 5.0XULN if judged by the investigator to be related to liver metastases)
- Written informed consent
Who cannot join
- Serious uncontrolled intercurrent infections
- Serious intercurrent medical or psychiatric illness, including active cardiac disease
- Pregnancy or breast feeding
- Second primary malignancy(except in situ carcinoma of the cervix or adequately treated nonmelanomatous carcinoma of the skin or other malignancy treated at least 5 years previously with no evidence of recurrence)
- Documented parenchymal or leptomeningeal brain metastasis
- Peripheral neuropathy ≥ grade 2
Show all 9Show fewer
- Prior treatment with gemcitabine will not be allowed.
- HER-2 overexpressing breast cancer and concomitant trastuzumab treatment is not allowed
- Women of childbearing potential, unwilling to use a medically acceptable method of contraception during the trial
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
South Korea2 sites
Samsung Medical Center
Seoul, 135-710
Asan Medical Center
Seoul, 138-736
About this study
Official title: A Phase II, Multicenter, Randomized Trial of Eribulin Plus Gemcitabine (EG) vs.Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine (PG) in Patients With HER2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer as First -Line Chemotherapy
Metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is an incurable disease and is needed to improve effective chemotherapy. Paclitaxel plus Gemcitabine (PG) combination chemotherapy is one of the preferred chemotherapeutic regimens for patients with MBC, and was found to be proper as a maintenance chemotherapy regimen with survival benefit and feasible toxicity profile as shown in a large phase III KCSG (Korean Cancer Study Group) study (Park Y et al. J Clin Oncol 31(14):1732, 2013).
Eribulin mesylate is a microtubule-targeting agent that showed improved overall survival benefit as monotherapy for MBC patients as a new chemotherapeutic agent after failure of anthracycline and taxane in EMBRACE study (Cortes J et. al. Lancet 377:914-923, 2011). Eribulin was also reported its promising efficacy in another randomized phase III study that demonstrated eribulin as efficacious as capecitabine (Kaufman P et. al. Abstr# S6-6, SABCS 2012). Both study results showed potential clinical benefit in patients with triple negative MBC (TNBC). Thus, eribulin combined with gemcitabine may be a new potential regimen for early line therapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer.
Read more
Furthermore, eribulin may have rational benefit compared with paclitaxel in terms of neurotoxicity. Although there is no direct evidence that eribulin has better neurotoxicity profile than taxane, eribulin tended to show less neurotoxicity compared with ixabepilone in a phase II trial (Vahdat, L et al. 2011 SABCS). Eribulin has no worsen toxicity as compared to paclitaxel. Therefore, EG may have less neurotoxicity comparing to PG.
In phase I trial, eribulin in combination with gemcitabine was feasible in patients with advanced solid tumor treated with chemotherapy (< 3 lines) (Goel R, et al, 2009 ASCO).
Based on this rationale, the investigators are to conduct randomized phase II study comparing EG chemotherapy with PG chemotherapy for patients with HER-2 negative MBC as first-line chemotherapy.
A total of 118 patients will be recruited. Patients will be randomized to a treatment arm by permutated method. The randomization ratio is 1:1. This study is multi-center, randomized, open label study.
Read the detailed description
A total of enrolled 118 patients in EG and PG groups, will be provided chemotherapy regimen:
Paclitaxel/Gemcitabine (PG) : every 3 weeks D1 Paclitaxel 175mg/m2 + D5W 500mL MIV over 3hrs before gemcitabine administration D1, D8 Gemcitabine 1,250 mg/m2 + NormalSaline 100ml MIV over 30mins
- Pre \& Post medication (which can be changed according to institutions' policy) D1 Corticosteroid 100 mg i.v. 30 min. before Paclitaxel Pheniramine 1A + D5W 50mL MIV 30mins before Paclitaxel Ranitidine 50mg IV + D5W 50mL MIV 30mins before Paclitaxel HT3 antagonist 1A + D5W 50 mL MIV 30mins before Paclitaxel
Eribulin/Gemcitabine (EG): every 3weeks D1, D8 Eribulin 1.0 mg/m2, 2-5min iv before gemcitabine (or miv with NormalSaline 100ml in max.) D1, D8 Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 + NormalSaline100ml MIV over 30mins
<schedule of Assessment adn procedures (±3 days window period ) >
- screening /baseline
- obtaining Informed consent form
- collecting information
- demographic data
- breast cancer treatment history/ medical history
- general physical examination/ vital sign \& Performance status
- Test: CBC/blood chemistry/ Tumor response(CT or MRI)/
- collecting QOL questionnaire using FACT-Taxane
- cycle 1 ~ prior to EOT
- general physical examination/ vital sign \& Performance status
- Test: CBC/blood chemistry/ Tumor response(CT or MRI)
- collecting QOL questionnaire using FACT-Taxane
- administration PG or EG
- EOT(end of treatment)
- general physical examination/ vital sign \& Performance status
- Test: CBC/blood chemistry/ Tumor response(CT or MRI)
- collecting QOL questionnaire using FACT-Taxane
- survival follow up(every 12weeks)
- survival
- anti neoplastic therapy after end of treatment
- The tumor response will be performed every 12 (±2) weeks until disease progression
<WITHDRAWAL OF SUBJECTS>
Subjects may be withdrawn from the study (i.e. from any further study medication or study procedure) for the following reasons:
- At their own request
- If, in the investigator's opinion, continuation in the study would be detrimental to the subject's well-being
- In case of disease progression
- In case of unacceptable toxicity
- Conditions
- Metastatic Breast Cancer
- Being tested
- Paclitaxel, Eribulin, Gemcitabine
- Keywords
- HER2-Negative
- Medical subject headings
- Breast Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
PaclitaxelDrug
Also called Genexol,
175mg/m2 + D5W 500mL MIV over 3hrs before gemcitabine administration
EribulinDrug
Also called Halaven,
1.0 mg/m2, 2-5min iv before gemcitabine (or miv with NS 100ml in max.)
GemcitabineDrug
Also called Gemcit
PG:1250mg/m2 + NS 100ml MIV over 30mins EG:1000mg/m2 + NS 100ml MIV over 30mins
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Paclitaxel & Gemcitabine(PG) | Active comparator | Paclitaxel 175mg/m2 IV , Day1,every 3weeks Gemcitabine 1250mg/m2 IV ,Day1\& Day8 every 3weeks Receives: Drug: Paclitaxel; Drug: Gemcitabine |
| Eribulin & Gemcitabine(EG) | Experimental | Eribulin 1.0 mg/m2, 2-5min iv ,Day1\& Day8 every 3weeks Gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 ,Day1\& Day8 every 3weeks Receives: Drug: Eribulin; Drug: Gemcitabine |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Progression free survival
To demonstrate that EG is not inferior to PG group in terms of PFS in patients with metastatic or recurrent breast cancer as first-line treatment.
Measured: 48months
Secondary outcomes (6)
overall survival
Survival will be measured as the time from randomization to the date of death.
Measured: 48months
neuropathic scale
FACT for Taxane QOL assessment
Measured: expected at 9week , expected at 24week
toxicity of study drugs
Using CTCAE Version 4.0
Measured: from first administration until 28 days after the last dose administration
duration of response
using RECIEST version 1.1
Measured: 48months
objective response rate
using RECIEST version 1.1
Measured: 48months
clinical benefit rate
using RECIEST version 1.1
Measured: 48months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Oct 2014 (estimated)
- Study start19 Dec 2014
- Primary completion11 May 2017
- Study completion17 Jun 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Metastatic Breast CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Asan Medical CenterThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 118 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Asan Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Eisai Inc., Dong-A ST Co., Ltd., Samyang Biopharmaceuticals Corporation
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Kyung Hae Jung, Asan Medical Center
- Investigators
- Kyung Hae Jung, Dr, Principal investigator, Asan Medical Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02263495
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2014-0857
- Acronym
- EG_PG
- Status last verified
- Jul 2020
- First submitted
- 6 Oct 2014
- Last updated
- 14 Jul 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Kim JY, Lee E, Park K, Im SA, Sohn J, Lee KS, Chae YS, Kim JH, Kim TY, Jung KH, Park YH; Breast Cancer Committee of the Korean Cancer Study Group. Exploratory biomarker analysis from a phase II clinical trial of eribulin plus gemcitabine versus paclitaxel plus gemcitabine for HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer patients (KCSG BR13-11). Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019 Nov;178(2):367-377. doi: 10.1007/s10549-019-05400-y. Epub 2019 Aug 12.
PubMed 31407230Park YH, Im SA, Kim SB, Sohn JH, Lee KS, Chae YS, Lee KH, Kim JH, Im YH, Kim JY, Kim TY, Lee KH, Ahn JH, Kim GM, Park IH, Lee SJ, Han HS, Kim SH, Jung KH; Korean Cancer Study Group (KCSG). Phase II, multicentre, randomised trial of eribulin plus gemcitabine versus paclitaxel plus gemcitabine as first-line chemotherapy in patients with HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2017 Nov;86:385-393. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.10.002. Epub 2017 Nov 5.
PubMed 29100193
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 14 Jul 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase II, Multicenter, Randomized Trial of Eribulin Plus Gemcitabine (EG) vs.Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine (PG) in Patients With HER2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer as First -Line Chemotherapy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02263495
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- EG_PG / 2014-0857
- Conditions
- Metastatic Breast Cancer
- Keywords
- HER2-Negative
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 118 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Asan Medical CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Eisai Inc., Dong-A ST Co., Ltd., Samyang Biopharmaceuticals Corporation
- Study start
- 19 Dec 2014 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 11 May 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- 17 Jun 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 13 Oct 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is an incurable disease and is needed to improve effective chemotherapy. Paclitaxel plus Gemcitabine (PG) combination chemotherapy is one of the preferred chemotherapeutic regimens for patients with MBC, and was found to be proper as a maintenance chemotherapy regimen with survival benefit and feasible toxicity profile as shown in a large phase III KCSG (Korean Cancer Study Group) study (Park Y et al. J Clin Oncol 31(14):1732, 2013).
Eribulin mesylate is a microtubule-targeting agent that showed improved overall survival benefit as monotherapy for MBC patients as a new chemotherapeutic agent after failure of anthracycline and taxane in EMBRACE study (Cortes J et. al. Lancet 377:914-923, 2011). Eribulin was also reported its promising efficacy in another randomized phase III study that demonstrated eribulin as efficacious as capecitabine (Kaufman P et. al. Abstr# S6-6, SABCS 2012). Both study results showed potential clinical benefit in patients with triple negative MBC (TNBC). Thus, eribulin combined with gemcitabine may be a new potential regimen for early line therapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer.
Furthermore, eribulin may have rational benefit compared with paclitaxel in terms of neurotoxicity. Although there is no direct evidence that eribulin has better neurotoxicity profile than taxane, eribulin tended to show less neurotoxicity compared with ixabepilone in a phase II trial (Vahdat, L et al. 2011 SABCS). Eribulin has no worsen toxicity as compared to paclitaxel. Therefore, EG may have less neurotoxicity comparing to PG.
In phase I trial, eribulin in combination with gemcitabine was feasible in patients with advanced solid tumor treated with chemotherapy (< 3 lines) (Goel R, et al, 2009 ASCO).
Based on this rationale, the investigators are to conduct randomized phase II study comparing EG chemotherapy with PG chemotherapy for patients with HER-2 negative MBC as first-line chemotherapy.
A total of 118 patients will be recruited. Patients will be randomized to a treatment arm by permutated method. The randomization ratio is 1:1. This study is multi-center, randomized, open label study.
Detailed description
A total of enrolled 118 patients in EG and PG groups, will be provided chemotherapy regimen:
Paclitaxel/Gemcitabine (PG) : every 3 weeks D1 Paclitaxel 175mg/m2 + D5W 500mL MIV over 3hrs before gemcitabine administration D1, D8 Gemcitabine 1,250 mg/m2 + NormalSaline 100ml MIV over 30mins
- Pre \& Post medication (which can be changed according to institutions' policy) D1 Corticosteroid 100 mg i.v. 30 min. before Paclitaxel Pheniramine 1A + D5W 50mL MIV 30mins before Paclitaxel Ranitidine 50mg IV + D5W 50mL MIV 30mins before Paclitaxel HT3 antagonist 1A + D5W 50 mL MIV 30mins before Paclitaxel
Eribulin/Gemcitabine (EG): every 3weeks D1, D8 Eribulin 1.0 mg/m2, 2-5min iv before gemcitabine (or miv with NormalSaline 100ml in max.) D1, D8 Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 + NormalSaline100ml MIV over 30mins
<schedule of Assessment adn procedures (±3 days window period ) >
- screening /baseline
- obtaining Informed consent form
- collecting information
- demographic data
- breast cancer treatment history/ medical history
- general physical examination/ vital sign \& Performance status
- Test: CBC/blood chemistry/ Tumor response(CT or MRI)/
- collecting QOL questionnaire using FACT-Taxane
- cycle 1 ~ prior to EOT
- general physical examination/ vital sign \& Performance status
- Test: CBC/blood chemistry/ Tumor response(CT or MRI)
- collecting QOL questionnaire using FACT-Taxane
- administration PG or EG
- EOT(end of treatment)
- general physical examination/ vital sign \& Performance status
- Test: CBC/blood chemistry/ Tumor response(CT or MRI)
- collecting QOL questionnaire using FACT-Taxane
- survival follow up(every 12weeks)
- survival
- anti neoplastic therapy after end of treatment
- The tumor response will be performed every 12 (±2) weeks until disease progression
<WITHDRAWAL OF SUBJECTS>
Subjects may be withdrawn from the study (i.e. from any further study medication or study procedure) for the following reasons:
- At their own request
- If, in the investigator's opinion, continuation in the study would be detrimental to the subject's well-being
- In case of disease progression
- In case of unacceptable toxicity
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Paclitaxel & Gemcitabine(PG) | Active comparator | Drug: Paclitaxel, Drug: GemcitabinePaclitaxel 175mg/m2 IV , Day1,every 3weeks Gemcitabine 1250mg/m2 IV ,Day1\& Day8 every 3weeks |
| Eribulin & Gemcitabine(EG) | Experimental | Drug: Eribulin, Drug: GemcitabineEribulin 1.0 mg/m2, 2-5min iv ,Day1\& Day8 every 3weeks Gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 ,Day1\& Day8 every 3weeks |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 19 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (16 listed)
- Histologically confirmed metastatic, or recurrent breast cancer
- HER2-negative breast cancer
- age > 18 years
- ECOG performance status 0 - 2
- Pre- or postmenopausal breast cancer patients with measurable or non-measurable lesions, who are candidates for chemotherapy
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Serious uncontrolled intercurrent infections
- Serious intercurrent medical or psychiatric illness, including active cardiac disease
- Pregnancy or breast feeding
- Second primary malignancy(except in situ carcinoma of the cervix or adequately treated nonmelanomatous carcinoma of the skin or other malignancy treated at least 5 years previously with no evidence of recurrence)
- Documented parenchymal or leptomeningeal brain metastasis
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| PaclitaxelAlso: Genexol,175mg/m2 + D5W 500mL MIV over 3hrs before gemcitabine administration | Drug | Paclitaxel & Gemcitabine(PG) |
| EribulinAlso: Halaven,1.0 mg/m2, 2-5min iv before gemcitabine (or miv with NS 100ml in max.) | Drug | Eribulin & Gemcitabine(EG) |
| GemcitabineAlso: GemcitPG:1250mg/m2 + NS 100ml MIV over 30mins EG:1000mg/m2 + NS 100ml MIV over 30mins | Drug | Eribulin & Gemcitabine(EG), Paclitaxel & Gemcitabine(PG) |
Primary outcome
Progression free survival
Time frame: 48months
To demonstrate that EG is not inferior to PG group in terms of PFS in patients with metastatic or recurrent breast cancer as first-line treatment.
6 secondary outcomes
overall survival
Time frame: 48months
neuropathic scale
Time frame: expected at 9week , expected at 24week
toxicity of study drugs
Time frame: from first administration until 28 days after the last dose administration
duration of response
Time frame: 48months
objective response rate
Time frame: 48months
clinical benefit rate
Time frame: 48months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 14 Jul 2020.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 31407230Kim JY, Lee E, Park K, Im SA, Sohn J, Lee KS, Chae YS, Kim JH, Kim TY, Jung KH, Park YH; Breast Cancer Committee of the Korean Cancer Study Group. Exploratory biomarker analysis from a phase II clinical trial of eribulin plus gemcitabine versus paclitaxel plus gemcitabine for HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer patients (KCSG BR13-11). Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019 Nov;178(2):367-377. doi: 10.1007/s10549-019-05400-y. Epub 2019 Aug 12.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 29100193Park YH, Im SA, Kim SB, Sohn JH, Lee KS, Chae YS, Lee KH, Kim JH, Im YH, Kim JY, Kim TY, Lee KH, Ahn JH, Kim GM, Park IH, Lee SJ, Han HS, Kim SH, Jung KH; Korean Cancer Study Group (KCSG). Phase II, multicentre, randomised trial of eribulin plus gemcitabine versus paclitaxel plus gemcitabine as first-line chemotherapy in patients with HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2017 Nov;86:385-393. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.10.002. Epub 2017 Nov 5.
Related trials for Metastatic Breast Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2
Gene Signatures to Guide HR+MBC Therapy in a Diverse Cohort
Invasive Mammary Carcinoma, Metastatic Breast Cancer
Not yet recruiting
Augmented-Reality ICG Fluorescence Second-Look for Residual Nodal Disease After Axillary Dissection in Breast Cancer
Breast Cancer, Breast Neoplasms
RecruitingPhase 2
BrAin Metastasis in tripLe Negateive Breast Cancer: IvoneScimab and Trop2 ADC
Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC), Brain Metastases
RecruitingPhase 1/2
A Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Multiple Treatment Combinations in Patients With Metastatic or Locally Advanced Breast Cancer
Metastatic Breast Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
Collection of CSF Samples From Participants With Metastatic Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) and HER2+ Breast Cancer With no Prior History Nor Active Radiographically Detectable Brain Metastases
Breast Cancer, Breast Carcinoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Kyung Hae Jung, Dr principal investigator
Asan Medical Center
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Paclitaxel, Eribulin and Gemcitabine in people with Metastatic Breast Cancer, run by Asan Medical Center at 2 sites in South Korea.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 16 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Jul 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Progression free survival (time frame: 48months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02263495, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Jul 2020.