AzTrials
AzTrials

MelanomaPhase 3MASTERKEY-265NCT02263508

Pembrolizumab With Talimogene Laherparepvec or Placebo in Unresected Melanoma

A Phase 3 study testing Talimogene Laherparepvec and Pembrolizumab in people with Melanoma, run by Amgen at 161 sites in 21 countries.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The primary objectives of the Phase 1b part of the study are to evaluate the safety, as assessed by incidence of dose limiting toxicity (DLT), of talimogene laherparepvec in combination with pembrolizumab in adults with previously untreated, unresectable, stage IIIB to IVM1c melanoma. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 95 years
Conditions the study is for
Melanoma
What is being tested?
Talimogene Laherparepvec and Pembrolizumab
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
713 participants
Where
161 sitesin 21 countries
Study dates
8 Dec 2014to 11 Mar 2021
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 95 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age ≥ 18 years with histologically confirmed diagnosis of melanoma and stage IIIB to IVM1c for whom surgery is not recommended.
  • Subjects must have measurable disease and be a candidate for intralesional therapy administration into cutaneous, subcutaneous, or nodal lesions.
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1.
  • Adequate hematologic, hepatic, renal, and coagulation function.
  • Subjects with serine/threonine protein kinase B-Raf V600 (BRAFV600) wild-type tumors must not have received any prior systemic anticancer treatment consisting of chemotherapy, immunotherapy, or targeted therapy given in a non-adjuvant setting for unresectable stage IIIB to IVM1c melanoma.
  • Subjects with B-Raf V600 (BRAFV600) mutated tumors who have received prior BRAF inhibitor therapy either alone or in combination with mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK) inhibitor as their only prior systemic therapy are eligible.
  • Subjects who received prior adjuvant therapy for melanoma will not be excluded (including, but not limited to, interferon, ipilimumab, limb infusion/perfusion, or use of investigational agents in the adjuvant setting) with the exception that prior adjuvant therapy with inhibitors of programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) or programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) is not allowed. However, if the subject received adjuvant therapy, the subject must have completed therapy at least 28 days prior to enrollment.
  • Subjects must have a tumor sample that is adequate for PD-L1 assessment prior to randomization.

Who cannot join

  • Subjects must not have clinically active cerebral metastases.
  • Subjects must not have primary uveal or mucosal melanoma, history or evidence of melanoma associated with immunodeficiency states or history of other malignancy within the past 3 years.
  • Subjects may not have been previously treated with talimogene laherparepvec, any other oncolytic virus, pembrolizumab, or any other inhibitor of PD-1, PD-L1, or PD-L2.
  • Subjects must not have history or evidence of symptomatic autoimmune pneumonitis, glomerulonephritis, vasculitis, other symptomatic autoimmune disease, documented history of autoimmune disease or syndrome requiring systemic treatment in the past 2 years (ie, with use of disease modifying agents, steroids or immunosuppressive agents) except vitiligo or resolved childhood asthma/atopy, or evidence of clinically significant immunosuppression.
  • Subjects must not have active herpetic skin lesions or prior complications of herpetic infection and must not require intermittent or chronic treatment with an antiherpetic drug (eg, acyclovir), other than intermittent topical use.

Trial locations and contacts

161 sites in 21 countries.

161 sites in 21 countries

United States41 sites
  • Research Site

    Atlanta, Georgia, 30322

  • Research Site

    Baltimore, Maryland, 21237

  • Research Site

    Beverly Hills, California, 90211

  • Research Site

    Birmingham, Alabama, 35243

  • Research Site

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02215

  • Research Site

    Buffalo, New York, 14263

  • Research Site

    Chicago, Illinois, 60611

  • Research Site

    Chicago, Illinois, 60637

  • Research Site

    Cincinnati, Ohio, 45209

  • Research Site

    Cleveland, Ohio, 44195

  • Research Site

    Dallas, Texas, 75246

  • Research Site

    Detroit, Michigan, 48201

  • Research Site

    Duarte, California, 91010

  • Research Site

    Encinitas, California, 92024

  • Research Site

    Fridley, Minnesota, 55432

  • Research Site

    Germantown, Tennessee, 38138

  • Research Site

    Hackensack, New Jersey, 07601

  • Research Site

    Knoxville, Tennessee, 37920

  • Research Site

    La Jolla, California, 92037

  • Research Site

    Los Angeles, California, 90024

  • Research Site

    Los Angeles, California, 90025

  • Research Site

    Louisville, Kentucky, 40202

  • Research Site

    Miami, Florida, 33136

  • Research Site

    Miami Beach, Florida, 33140

  • Research Site

    Mobile, Alabama, 36608

  • Research Site

    Murray, Utah, 84107

  • Research Site

    Nashville, Tennessee, 37232

  • Research Site

    New York, New York, 10016

  • Research Site

    New York, New York, 10032

  • Research Site

    New York, New York, 10065

  • Research Site

    Orlando, Florida, 32806

  • Research Site

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107

  • Research Site

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19111

  • Research Site

    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15232

  • Research Site

    Riverside, California, 92505

  • Research Site

    Salt Lake City, Utah, 84112

  • Research Site

    San Francisco, California, 94115

  • Research Site

    San Francisco, California, 94117

  • Research Site

    Santa Monica, California, 90404

  • Research Site

    Seattle, Washington, 98109-1023

  • Research Site

    St Louis, Missouri, 63110-1093

Other trials in United States

Germany14 sites
  • Research Site

    Berlin, 10117

  • Research Site

    Dresden, 01307

  • Research Site

    Erlangen, 91054

  • Research Site

    Essen, 45147

  • Research Site

    Hanover, 30625

  • Research Site

    Heidelberg, 69120

  • Research Site

    Kiel, 24105

  • Research Site

    Leipzig, 04103

  • Research Site

    Mainz, 55131

  • Research Site

    Mannheim, 68167

  • Research Site

    München, 80337

  • Research Site

    Regensburg, 93053

  • Research Site

    Tübingen, 72076

  • Research Site

    Würzburg, 97080

Other trials in Germany

Australia11 sites
  • Research Site

    Geelong, Victoria, 3220

  • Research Site

    Heidelberg, Victoria, 3084

  • Research Site

    Melbourne, Victoria, 3000

  • Research Site

    Murdoch, Western Australia, 6150

  • Research Site

    North Sydney, New South Wales, 2060

  • Research Site

    Prahran, Victoria, 3181

  • Research Site

    Southport, Queensland, 4215

  • Research Site

    Waratah, New South Wales, 2298

  • Research Site

    Wollongong, New South Wales, 2500

  • Research Site

    Woodville South, South Australia, 5011

  • Research Site

    Woolloongabba, Queensland, 4102

Other trials in Australia

France10 sites
  • Research Site

    Bordeaux, 33075

  • Research Site

    Grenoble, 38043

  • Research Site

    Lille, 59037

  • Research Site

    Lyon, 69373

  • Research Site

    Marseille, 13385

  • Research Site

    Nantes, 44093

  • Research Site

    Paris, 75010

  • Research Site

    Pierre-Bénite, 69495

  • Research Site

    Toulouse, 31059

  • Research Site

    Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, 54511

Other trials in France

Poland10 sites
  • Research Site

    Bielsko-Biala, 43-300

  • Research Site

    Bydgoszcz, 85-796

  • Research Site

    Gdansk, 80-952

  • Research Site

    Konin, 62-500

  • Research Site

    Krakow, 31-501

  • Research Site

    Poznan, 60-848

  • Research Site

    Poznan, 61-866

  • Research Site

    Szczecin, 71-730

  • Research Site

    Warsaw, 02-781

  • Research Site

    Wroclaw, 50-368

Other trials in Poland

United Kingdom10 sites
  • Research Site

    Birmingham, B15 2TH

  • Research Site

    Guildford, GU2 7XX

  • Research Site

    Leeds, LS9 7TF

  • Research Site

    Leicester, LE1 5WW

  • Research Site

    London, SE1 9RT

  • Research Site

    London, SW3 6JJ

  • Research Site

    Manchester, M20 4BX

  • Research Site

    Oxford, OX3 7LJ

  • Research Site

    Preston, PR2 9HT

  • Research Site

    Southampton, SO16 6YD

Other trials in United Kingdom

Spain8 sites
  • Research Site

    Badalona, Catalonia, 08916

  • Research Site

    Barcelona, Catalonia, 08036

  • Research Site

    Donostia / San Sebastian, Basque Country, 20014

  • Research Site

    Madrid, 28009

  • Research Site

    Madrid, 28046

  • Research Site

    Madrid, 28050

  • Research Site

    Pamplona, Navarre, 31008

  • Research Site

    Valencia, Valencia, 46014

Other trials in Spain

Canada7 sites
  • Research Site

    Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 1Z2

  • Research Site

    Kingston, Ontario, K7L 2V7

  • Research Site

    London, Ontario, N6A 4L6

  • Research Site

    Montreal, Quebec, H3T 1E2

  • Research Site

    Ottawa, Ontario, K1H 8L6

  • Research Site

    Québec, Quebec, G1R 2J6

  • Research Site

    Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2M9

Other trials in Canada

Czechia6 sites
  • Research Site

    Brno, 656 53

  • Research Site

    Olomouc, 775 20

  • Research Site

    Ostrava-Poruba, 708 52

  • Research Site

    Prague, 100 34

  • Research Site

    Prague, 128 08

  • Research Site

    Prague, 180 81

Other trials in Czechia

Italy6 sites
  • Research Site

    Bergamo, 24127

  • Research Site

    Brescia, 25123

  • Research Site

    Meldola FC, 47014

  • Research Site

    Milan, 20133

  • Research Site

    Milan, 20141

  • Research Site

    Siena, 53100

Other trials in Italy

South Africa6 sites
  • Research Site

    Groenkloof, Gauteng, 0181

  • Research Site

    Johannesburg, Gauteng, 2196

  • Research Site

    Kraaifontein, 7570

  • Research Site

    Parktown, Gauteng, 2193

  • Research Site

    Pretoria, 0002

  • Research Site

    Pretoria, 0081

Other trials in South Africa

Greece5 sites
  • Research Site

    Athens, 11527

  • Research Site

    Athens, 18547

  • Research Site

    Heraklion - Crete, 71110

  • Research Site

    Ioannina, 45500

  • Research Site

    Thessaloniki, 54622

Other trials in Greece

Switzerland5 sites
  • Research Site

    Bellinzona, 6500

  • Research Site

    Bern, 3010

  • Research Site

    Geneva, 1211

  • Research Site

    Lausanne, 1011

  • Research Site

    Zurich, 8091

Other trials in Switzerland

Austria4 sites
  • Research Site

    Graz, 8036

  • Research Site

    Innsbruck, 6020

  • Research Site

    Salzburg, 5020

  • Research Site

    Vienna, 1090

Other trials in Austria

Netherlands4 sites
  • Research Site

    Amsterdam, 1066 CX

  • Research Site

    Amsterdam, 1081 HV

  • Research Site

    Groningen, 9713 GZ

  • Research Site

    Nijmegen, 6525 GA

Other trials in Netherlands

Portugal4 sites
  • Research Site

    Almada, 2801-951

  • Research Site

    Lisbon, 1099-023

  • Research Site

    Lisbon, 1649-035

  • Research Site

    Porto, 4200-072

Other trials in Portugal

Hungary3 sites
  • Research Site

    Budapest, 1122

  • Research Site

    Pécs, 7632

  • Research Site

    Szeged, 6720

Other trials in Hungary

Belgium2 sites
  • Research Site

    Brussels, 1200

  • Research Site

    Liège, 4000

Other trials in Belgium

Russia2 sites
  • Research Site

    Moscow, 115478

  • Research Site

    Saint Petersburg, 197758

Other trials in Russia

South Korea2 sites
  • Research Site

    Seoul, 03722

  • Research Site

    Seoul, 05505

Other trials in South Korea

Finland1 site
  • Research Site

    Helsinki, 00290

Other trials in Finland

About this study

Official title: A Phase 1b/3, Multicenter, Trial of Talimogene Laherparepvec in Combination With Pembrolizumab (MK-3475) for Treatment of Unresectable Stage IIIB to IVM1c Melanoma (MASTERKEY-265)

The primary objectives of the Phase 1b part of the study are to evaluate the safety, as assessed by incidence of dose limiting toxicity (DLT), of talimogene laherparepvec in combination with pembrolizumab in adults with previously untreated, unresectable, stage IIIB to IVM1c melanoma.

The primary objective of Phase 3 are to evaluate the efficacy of talimogene laherparepvec with pembrolizumab versus placebo with pembrolizumab, as assessed by progression-free survival (PFS) (response evaluation by blinded independent central review using modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors [RECIST] 1.1) and overall survival (OS).

Conditions
Melanoma
Being tested
Talimogene Laherparepvec, Pembrolizumab, Placebo
Keywords
Talimogene Laherparepvec, pembrolizumab, KEYNOTE-034, MASTERKEY-265
Medical subject headings
Melanoma

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Talimogene LaherparepvecDrug

    Also called IMLYGIC®, OncoVEX^GM-CSF, T-VEC

    Talimogene laherparepvec administered by intratumoral injection

  • PembrolizumabDrug

    Also called MK-3475, Keytruda®

    Administered at a dose of 200 mg as an intravenous infusion over approximately 30 minutes.

  • PlaceboDrug

    Administered by intratumoral injection

Study groups in NCT02263508
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Phase 1b: Talimogene Laherparepvec + PembrolizumabExperimentalParticipants received talimogene laherparepvec at an initial dose of up to 4 mL 10⁶ plaque-forming units (PFU)/mL by intralesional injection. Subsequent doses of talimogene laherparepvec at up to 4 mL of 10⁸ PFU/mL began 3 weeks after the first dose and were administered every 2 weeks until disappearance of injectable lesions, complete response (CR), confirmed disease progression (PD) per modified Immune-related Response Criteria (irRC), intolerance of study treatment, 24 months from the date of the first dose of pembrolizumab, or end of study, whichever occurred first. Participants also received 200 mg pembrolizumab administered intravenously every 2 weeks starting at the time of the third dose of talimogene laherparepvec (week 6) until confirmed PD per modified irRC, treatment intolerance, 24 months from the first dose, or end of study, whichever occurred first.
Receives: Drug: Talimogene Laherparepvec; Drug: Pembrolizumab
Phase 3 : Placebo + PembrolizumabPlacebo comparatorParticipants received up to 4 mL placebo to talimogene laherparepvec by intralesional injection on day 1 of week 0. Subsequent doses of placebo (up to 4 mL) began 3 weeks after the first dose and were administered every 2 weeks until the fifth injection (week 9), and then synchronously with pembrolizumab thereafter every 3 weeks until disappearance of injectable lesions, complete response per modified Immune-related Response Criteria simulating Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (irRC-RECIST) (iCR), confirmed iPD per modified irRC-RECIST, intolerance of study treatment, 24 months from the date of the first dose of placebo, or end of study, whichever occurred first. Participants also received 200 mg pembrolizumab administered intravenously every 3 weeks starting on day 1 of week 0, until confirmed iPD per modified irRC-RECIST, treatment intolerance, 24 months from the first dose, or end of study, whichever occurred first.
Receives: Drug: Pembrolizumab; Drug: Placebo
Phase 3: Talimogene Laherparepvec + PembrolizumabExperimentalParticipants received talimogene laherparepvec at an initial dose of up to 4 mL 10⁶ PFU/mL by intralesional injection on day 1. Subsequent doses of talimogene laherparepvec at 10⁸ PFU/mL (up to 4 mL) began 3 weeks after the first dose and were administered every 2 weeks until the fifth injection of talimogene laherparepvec (week 9), and then synchronously with pembrolizumab thereafter every 3 weeks until disappearance of injectable lesions, iCR, confirmed iPD per modified irRC-RECIST, intolerance of study treatment, 24 months from the date of the first dose of talimogene laherparepvec, or end of study, whichever occurred first. Participants also received 200 mg pembrolizumab administered intravenously every 3 weeks starting on day 1 of week 0, until confirmed iPD per modified irRC-RECIST, treatment intolerance, 24 months from the first dose, or end of study, whichever occurred first.
Receives: Drug: Talimogene Laherparepvec; Drug: Pembrolizumab

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Phase 1b: Number of Participants With Dose-limiting Toxicities (DLTs)

    A DLT was defined as any toxicity related to study drug which met any of the following criteria based on Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0:

    • Grade 4 non-hematologic toxicity.
    • Grade 3 or higher pneumonitis.
    • Grade 3 non-hematologic toxicity lasting > 3 days despite optimal supportive care, excluding grade 3 fatigue.
    • Any grade 3 or higher non-hematologic laboratory value if medical intervention was required, or the abnormality lead to hospitalization, or the abnormality persisted for > 1 week.
    • Febrile neutropenia grade 3 or grade 4.
    • Thrombocytopenia < 25 x 10^9/L if associated with a bleeding event which does not result in hemodynamic instability but required an elective platelet infusion, or a life-threatening bleeding event which resulted in urgent intervention and admission to intensive care unit.
    • Grade 5 toxicity (ie, death).
    • Any other intolerable toxicity leading to permanent discontinuation of talimogene laherparepvec or pembrolizumab.

    Measured: The DLT evaluation period was 6 weeks from the initial administration of pembrolizumab (week 6 to 12).

  2. Phase 3: Progression Free Survival (PFS) by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) Assessed Using Modified RECIST 1.1

    PFS per modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 is defined as the interval from randomization to the earlier event of progressive disease (PD) per modified RECIST 1.1 or death from any cause.

    PD: Increase in size of target lesions from nadir by ≥ 20% and ≥ 5 mm absolute increase above nadir, or the appearance of a new lesion.

    Median PFS was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Participants without an event were censored at their last evaluable tumor assessment if available; otherwise on their randomization date.

    The primary analysis of PFS was specified to be conducted when 407 PFS events had occurred (data cut-off date 02 March 2020).

    Measured: From randomization until the data-cut-off date of 02 March 2020; median (range) time on follow-up was 25.5 (0.6, 44.7) months in the Placebo + Pembrolizumab arm and 25.6 (0.3, 45.8) months in the Talimogene Laherparepvec + Pembrolizumab arm.

  3. Phase 3: Overall Survival

    Overall survival (OS) is defined as the interval from randomization to death from any cause.

    Median overall survival was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Participants without an event were censored at their last known alive date.

    Measured: From randomization until the end of study; median (range) time on follow-up was 34.8 (0.6, 58.3) months in the Placebo + Pembrolizumab arm and 36.8 (0.3, 58.4) months in the Talimogene Laherparepvec + Pembrolizumab arm.

Secondary outcomes (22)
  1. Phase 1b: Objective Response Rate (ORR)

    ORR is defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) using the modified Immune-related Response Criteria (irRC), by Investigator assessment.

    CR was defined as the disappearance of all lesions; PR was defined as a decrease in tumor area ≥ 50% relative to baseline, response must have been confirmed by a second, consecutive assessment at least 4 weeks apart.

    Radiographic imaging for assessment of lesions was performed using computed tomography (CT), positron emission tomography (PET), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), or ultrasound. Clinical measurement of cutaneous, subcutaneous, and palpable nodal tumor lesions was conducted with calipers.

    Measured: Tumor assessments were performed at week 6 (prior to initiation of pembrolizumab), week 18, and every 12 weeks thereafter until confirmed PD or start of new anticancer treatment; median (range) time on follow-up was 58.6 (1.4, 61.6) months.

  2. Phase 1b: Best Overall Response (BOR)

    Best overall response is defined as the best overall visit response in the following order: CR, PR, stable disease (SD), progressive disease (PD), or unevaluable (UE), based on investigator assessment using the modified irRC up to the start of any subsequent anti-cancer therapy.

    CR was defined as the disappearance of all lesions; PR was defined as a decrease in tumor area ≥ 50% relative to baseline; PD was defined as an increase in tumor area ≥ 25% relative to nadir; and SD was defined as any outcome not meeting the criteria for response or PD with ≥ 77 days elapsed after enrollment. Responses and PD must have been confirmed by a second, consecutive assessment at least 4 weeks apart.

    Measured: Tumor assessments were performed at week 6 (prior to initiation of pembrolizumab), week 18, and every 12 weeks thereafter until confirmed PD or start of new anticancer treatment; median (range) time on follow-up was 58.6 (1.4, 61.6) months.

  3. Phase 1b: Durable Response Rate (DRR)

    DRR is defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall response of CR or PR using the modified irRC per Investigator assessment with a duration of response of at least 6 months.

    CR was defined as the disappearance of all lesions; PR was defined as a decrease in tumor area ≥ 50% relative to baseline, response must have been confirmed by a second, consecutive assessment at least 4 weeks apart.

    Measured: Tumor assessments were performed at week 6 (prior to initiation of pembrolizumab), week 18, and every 12 weeks thereafter until confirmed PD or start of new anticancer treatment; median (range) time on follow-up was 58.6 (1.4, 61.6) months.

  4. Phase 1b: Duration of Response (DOR)

    Duration of response (DOR) is defined as the time from the date of an initial response (CR or PR) that is subsequently confirmed to the earlier of confirmed PD or death. Participants who had not ended their response at the time of analysis were censored at their last evaluable tumor assessment before start of the first subsequent anticancer therapy.

    CR was defined as the disappearance of all lesions; PR was defined as a decrease in tumor area ≥ 50% relative to baseline; PD was defined as an increase in tumor area ≥ 25% relative to nadir. Response and PD must have been confirmed by a second, consecutive assessment at least 4 weeks apart.

    Measured: Tumor assessments were performed at week 6 (prior to initiation of pembrolizumab), week 18, and every 12 weeks thereafter until confirmed PD or start of new anticancer treatment; median (range) time on follow-up was 58.6 (1.4, 61.6) months.

  5. Phase 1b: Disease Control Rate (DCR)

    DCR is defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall response of CR, PR, or SD using the modified irRC per Investigator assessment.

    CR was defined as the disappearance of all lesions; PR was defined as a decrease in tumor area ≥ 50% relative to baseline, response must have been confirmed by a second, consecutive assessment at least 4 weeks apart; and SD was defined as any outcome not meeting the criteria for response or PD with ≥ 84 days elapsed after enrollment.

    Measured: Tumor assessments were performed at week 6 (prior to initiation of pembrolizumab), week 18, and every 12 weeks thereafter until confirmed PD or start of new anticancer treatment; median (range) time on follow-up was 58.6 (1.4, 61.6) months.

  6. Phase 1b: Progression-free Survival (PFS)

    Progression-free survival is defined as the time from first dose to the earlier event of confirmed PD per modified irRC or death from any cause. PFS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Participants without an event were censored at their last evaluable tumor assessment.

    Measured: From first dose until the end of study; median (range) time on follow-up was 70.6 (1.4, 74.5) months.

  7. Phase 1b: Overall Survival (OS)

    Overall survival is defined as the interval from first dose to death from any cause.

    OS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Participants without an event were censored at their last known alive date.

    Measured: From first dose until the end of study; median (range) time on follow-up was 70.6 (1.4, 74.5) months.

  8. Phase 3: Complete Response Rate Assessed Using Modified irRC-RECIST (iCRR)

    Complete response rate per modified Immune-related Response Criteria (irRC) simulating RECIST 1.1 (irRC-RECIST) is defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall response of complete response assessed using the modified irRC-RECIST (iCR) evaluated by blinded independent central review.

    iCR: Disappearance of all lesions (whether measurable or not and whether baseline or new) and confirmation by a repeat, consecutive assessment at least 4 weeks after the criteria were first met. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to <10 mm.

    Modifications to the irRC-RECIST 1.1 included an increase in the total number of target lesions and new measurable lesions to 10 with a maximum of 5 target lesions per organ, and target lesions must have been measurable by CT or MRI only.

    Measured: Tumor assessments were performed every 12 weeks after initiation of treatment until confirmed PD or start of new anticancer treatment; median (range) time on follow-up was 30.6 (0.6, 53.0) months and 31.4 (0.3, 52.5) months in each group, respectively.

  9. Phase 3: Progression Free Survival Assessed Using Modified irRC-RECIST (iPFS)

    PFS per modified irRC-RECIST is defined as the interval from randomization to the earlier event of progressive disease assessed by modified irRC-RECIST (iPD) evaluated by blinded independent central review, or death from any cause.

    iPD: Increase in tumor burden ≥ 20% and at least 5 mm absolute increase relative to nadir (minimum recorded tumor burden) confirmed by a repeat, consecutive assessment at least 4 weeks after the initial detection.

    Median iPFS was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Participants without an event were censored at their last evaluable tumor assessment if available; otherwise on their randomization date.

    The primary analysis of iPFS was specified to be conducted when 256 iPFS events had occurred (data cut-off date 29 September 2020).

    Measured: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 29 September 2020; median time on follow-up was 30.6 (0.6, 53.0) months in the Placebo + Pembrolizumab arm and 31.4 (0.3, 52.5) months in the Talimogene Laherparepvec + Pembrolizumab arm.

  10. Phase 3: Overall Survival Excluding Stage IVM1c Participants

    Overall survival is defined as the interval from randomization to death from any cause.

    Median OS was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Participants without an event were censored at the last known alive date.

    Measured: From randomization until the end of study; median (range) time on follow-up was 34.8 (0.6, 58.3) months in the Placebo + Pembrolizumab arm and 36.8 (0.3, 58.4) months in the Talimogene Laherparepvec + Pembrolizumab arm.

  11. Phase 3: Objective Response Rate Assessed Using Modified RECIST 1.1

    ORR is defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) assessed using modified RECIST version 1.1, evaluated by blinded independent central review.

    CR was defined as the disappearance of all lesions except lymph node short axis < 10 mm; PR was defined as a ≥ 30% reduction in sum of diameters in target lesions. Confirmation of CR or PR was not required.

    Modifications to conventional RECIST 1.1 included the following: target lesions were measurable on CT or MRI; otherwise, they were considered as nontarget lesions. A maximum of 10 target lesions was allowed with up to 5 per organ.

    Measured: Tumor assessments were performed every 12 weeks after initiation of treatment until confirmed PD or start of new anticancer treatment; median (range) time on follow-up was 30.6 (0.6, 53.0) months and 31.4 (0.3, 52.5) months in each group, respectively.

  12. Phase 3: Best Overall Response Assessed Using Modified RECIST 1.1

    BOR is defined as the best overall visit response up to and including the first overall visit response of PD in the following order: CR, PR, SD, non-CR/Non-PD (NN), PD or UE per modified RECIST 1.1, evaluated by BICR.

    CR: Disappearance of all lesions except lymph node short axis < 10 mm; PR: ≥ 30% reduction in sum of diameters in target lesions. Confirmation of CR or PR was not required; NN: Persistence of ≥ 1 non-target lesions and/or maintenance of tumor marker level above normal limits; SD: Neither sufficient shrinkage of target lesions to qualify for CR or PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD and ≥ 84 days from randomization; PD: Increase from nadir by ≥ 20% or ≥ 5 mm of target lesions or any new lesion; Missing: No postbaseline assessment, or assessments on or after the start of first subsequent anticancer therapy, including complete or partial removal/reduction of any target lesion which contained melanoma on pathology evaluation or pathology results were unknown.

    Measured: Tumor assessments were performed every 12 weeks after initiation of treatment until confirmed PD or start of new anticancer treatment; median (range) time on follow-up was 30.6 (0.6, 53.0) months and 31.4 (0.3, 52.5) months in each group, respectively.

  13. Phase 3: Durable Response Rate (DRR) Assessed Using Modified RECIST 1.1

    DRR is defined as the percentage of participants with a CR or PR per modified RECIST 1.1 evaluated by blinded independent central review, with a duration of response of ≥ 6 months.

    CR was defined as the disappearance of all lesions except lymph node short axis < 10 mm; PR was defined as a ≥ 30% reduction in sum of diameters in target lesions. Confirmation of CR or PR was not required.

    Measured: Tumor assessments were performed every 12 weeks after initiation of treatment until confirmed PD or start of new anticancer treatment; median (range) time on follow-up was 30.6 (0.6, 53.0) months and 31.4 (0.3, 52.5) months in each group, respectively.

  14. Phase 3: Duration of Response (DOR) Assessed Using Modified RECIST 1.1

    Duration of response (DOR) is defined as the time from the date of an initial response of CR or PR to the earlier of PD per modified RECIST 1.1, or death. Participants who had not ended their response at the time of analysis were censored at their last evaluable tumor assessment date before start of the first subsequent anticancer therapy.

    CR was defined as the disappearance of all lesions except lymph node short axis < 10 mm; PR was defined as a ≥ 30% reduction in sum of diameters in target lesions. Confirmation of CR or PR was not required. PD was defined as an increase from nadir by ≥ 20% or ≥ 5 mm absolute increase above nadir of target lesions or appearance of any new lesion.

    Measured: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 29 September 2020; median time on follow-up was 30.6 (0.6, 53.0) months in the Placebo + Pembrolizumab arm and 31.4 (0.3, 52.5) months in the Talimogene Laherparepvec + Pembrolizumab arm.

  15. Phase 3: Disease Control Rate (DCR) Assessed Using RECIST 1.1

    Disease control rate (DCR) per modified RECIST 1.1 is defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall response of CR, PR or SD evaluated by blinded independent central review.

    CR was defined as the disappearance of all lesions except lymph node short axis < 10 mm; PR was defined as a ≥ 30% reduction in sum of diameters in target lesions. Confirmation of CR or PR was not required. SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage of target lesions to qualify for CR or PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD with ≥ 84 days elapsed after randomization.

    Measured: Tumor assessments were performed every 12 weeks after initiation of treatment until confirmed PD or start of new anticancer treatment; median (range) time on follow-up was 30.6 (0.6, 53.0) months and 31.4 (0.3, 52.5) months in each group, respectively.

  16. Phase 3: Objective Response Rate Assessed Using Modified irRC-RECIST (iORR)

    Objective response rate per modified irRC-RECIST is defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall response of iCR or partial response assessed using modified irRC-RECIST (iPR) evaluated by blinded independent central review.

    iCR: Disappearance of all lesions (whether measurable or not and whether baseline or new) and confirmation by a repeat, consecutive assessment at least 4 weeks from the date first documented. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to <10 mm.

    iPR: Decrease in tumor burden ≥ 30% relative to baseline confirmed by a consecutive assessment at least 4 weeks after first documentation.

    Modifications to the irRC-RECIST 1.1 included an increase in the total number of target lesions and new measurable lesions to 10 with a maximum of 5 target lesions per organ, and target lesions must be measurable by CT or MRI only.

    Measured: Tumor assessments were performed every 12 weeks after initiation of treatment until confirmed PD or start of new anticancer treatment; median (range) time on follow-up was 30.6 (0.6, 53.0) months and 31.4 (0.3, 52.5) months in each group, respectively.

  17. Phase 3: Best Overall Response Assessed Using Modified irRC-RECIST

    BOR is defined as the best overall visit response in the following order: iCR, iPR, stable disease per modified irRC-RECIST (iSD), iPD, or UE per modified irRC-RECIST (iUE), evaluated by BICR.

    iCR: Disappearance of all lesions confirmed by consecutive assessment ≥ 4 weeks from the date first documented. Reduction of any pathological lymph node to <10 mm.

    iPR: Decrease in tumor burden ≥ 30% relative to baseline confirmed ≥ 4 weeks after first documentation.

    iPD: Increase in tumor burden ≥ 20 % and at least 5 mm absolute increase relative to nadir confirmed ≥ 4 weeks from initial detection.

    iSD: Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for iCR or iPR nor sufficient increase to qualify for iPD and ≥ 84 days from randomization.

    Missing: No postbaseline assessment, or assessments after start of first subsequent anticancer therapy, including complete or partial removal/reduction of any target lesion which contained melanoma on pathology evaluation or pathology results were unknown.

    Measured: Tumor assessments were performed every 12 weeks after initiation of treatment until confirmed PD or start of new anticancer treatment; median (range) time on follow-up was 30.6 (0.6, 53.0) months and 31.4 (0.3, 52.5) months in each group, respectively.

  18. Phase 3: Durable Response Rate Assessed Using Modified irRC-RECIST (iDRR)

    Durable response rate per modified irRC-RECIST is defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall response of iCR or iPR per modified irRC-RECIST evaluated by blinded independent central review with a duration of response ≥ 6 months.

    iCR: Disappearance of all lesions (whether measurable or not and whether baseline or new) and confirmation by a repeat, consecutive assessment at least 4 weeks from the date first documented. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to <10 mm.

    iPR: Decrease in tumor burden ≥ 30% relative to baseline confirmed by a consecutive assessment at least 4 weeks after first documentation.

    Measured: Tumor assessments were performed every 12 weeks after initiation of treatment until confirmed PD or start of new anticancer treatment; median (range) time on follow-up was 30.6 (0.6, 53.0) months and 31.4 (0.3, 52.5) months in each group, respectively.

  19. Phase 3: Duration of Response Assessed Using Modified irRC-RECIST (iDOR)

    Duration of response per modified irRC-RECIST is defined as the time from the date of an initial response of iCR or iPR that was subsequently confirmed to the earlier of iPD per modified irRC-RECIST evaluated by blinded independent central review, or death. Participants who had not ended their response at the time of analysis were censored at their last evaluable tumor assessment date before the start of the first subsequent anticancer therapy.

    iCR: Disappearance of all lesions (whether measurable or not and whether baseline or new) and confirmation by a repeat, consecutive assessment at least 4 weeks from the date first documented. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to <10 mm.

    iPR: Decrease in tumor burden ≥ 30% relative to baseline confirmed by a consecutive assessment at least 4 weeks after first documentation.

    Measured: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 29 September 2020; median time on follow-up was 30.6 (0.6, 53.0) months in the Placebo + Pembrolizumab arm and 31.4 (0.3, 52.5) months in the Talimogene Laherparepvec + Pembrolizumab arm.

  20. Phase 3: Disease Control Rate Assessed Using Modified irRC-RECIST (iDCR)

    Disease control rate per modified irRC-RECIST is defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall response of iCR, iCR, or iSD assessed using modified irRC-RECIST evaluated by blinded independent central review.

    iCR: Disappearance of all lesions (whether measurable or not and whether baseline or new) and confirmation by a repeat, consecutive assessment at least 4 weeks from the date first documented. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to <10 mm.

    iPR: Decrease in tumor burden ≥ 30% relative to baseline confirmed by a consecutive assessment at least 4 weeks after first documentation.

    iSD: Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for iCR or iPR nor sufficient increase to qualify for iPD with ≥ 84 days elapsed after randomization.

    Measured: Tumor assessments were performed every 12 weeks after initiation of treatment until confirmed PD or start of new anticancer treatment; median (range) time on follow-up was 30.6 (0.6, 53.0) months and 31.4 (0.3, 52.5) months in each group, respectively.

  21. Phase 3: Change From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Module (EORTC QLQ-C30) Global Health Status (GHS)/Quality of Life (QOL) Score

    The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status/quality of life scale, 5 functional scales, and 9 symptom scales/items.

    The global health/QoL scale consists of 2 questions that ask participants to rate their overall health and overall quality of life during the past week on a scale from 1 (very poor) to 7 (excellent). The GHS/QoL subscale score was derived as the mean of each score then transformed to a scale from 0 to 100 where higher scores represent a better health status and a positive change from baseline indicates improvement.

    The overall change from baseline (calculated from all on-treatment visits) was calculated using a restricted maximum likelihood-based mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM) (see model details in statistical analysis section).

    Measured: Baseline and day 1 of weeks 3, 6, 9, 12, then every 6 weeks until end of study treatment; median (range) duration of treatment was 39.0 (0.1, 107.3) weeks in Placebo + Pembrolizumab and 54.1 (0.1, 109.6) weeks in Talimogene Laherparepvec + Pembrolizumab.

  22. Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

    An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical trial subject, including worsening of a pre-existing medical condition. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with study treatment. TEAEs include AEs from the first dose of study drug to 30 days after the last dose.

    A serious adverse event (SAE) is an AE that met at least 1 of the following criteria:

    • fatal
    • life threatening
    • required in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization
    • resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity
    • congenital anomaly/birth defect
    • other medically important serious event. Treatment-emergent SAEs are any SAE occurring from first dose of study drug through 90 days after the last dose or 30 days after the last dose if new anticancer therapy was started, whichever was earlier.

    AEs were graded for severity using CTCAE version 4.0, where Grade 1 = Mild; Grade 2 = Moderate; Grade 3 = Severe; Grade 4 = Life-threatening; Grade 5 = Fatal.

    Measured: From first dose to 30 days after last dose (90 days for SAEs); median (range) duration was 48 (5.1, 110.1) weeks in Phase 1b, 39 (0.1, 107.3) weeks in Placebo + Pembrolizumab and 56 (0.1, 109.6) weeks in Phase 3 Talimogene Laherparepvec + Pembrolizumab.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted13 Oct 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study start8 Dec 2014
  3. Primary completion11 Mar 2021
  4. Study completion11 Mar 2021

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Phase 1b was an open-label, single-arm study. Phase 3 was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study design.
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
713 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02263508
Sponsor's protocol ID
20110265
Other IDs
2014-000185-22, KEYNOTE-034, 2014
Acronym
MASTERKEY-265
Status last verified
Nov 2022
First submitted
26 Sep 2014
Last updated
14 Nov 2022
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: De-identified individual patient data for variables necessary to address the specific research question in an approved data sharing request

Publications

  • Ribas A, Dummer R, Puzanov I, VanderWalde A, Andtbacka RHI, Michielin O, Olszanski AJ, Malvehy J, Cebon J, Fernandez E, Kirkwood JM, Gajewski TF, Chen L, Gorski KS, Anderson AA, Diede SJ, Lassman ME, Gansert J, Hodi FS, Long GV. Oncolytic Virotherapy Promotes Intratumoral T Cell Infiltration and Improves Anti-PD-1 Immunotherapy. Cell. 2017 Sep 7;170(6):1109-1119.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.08.027.

    PubMed 28886381
  • Dummer R, Hoeller C, Gruter IP, Michielin O. Combining talimogene laherparepvec with immunotherapies in melanoma and other solid tumors. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2017 Jun;66(6):683-695. doi: 10.1007/s00262-017-1967-1. Epub 2017 Feb 25.

    PubMed 28238174
  • Chesney JA, Ribas A, Long GV, Kirkwood JM, Dummer R, Puzanov I, Hoeller C, Gajewski TF, Gutzmer R, Rutkowski P, Demidov L, Arenberger P, Shin SJ, Ferrucci PF, Haydon A, Hyngstrom J, van Thienen JV, Haferkamp S, Guilera JM, Rapoport BL, VanderWalde A, Diede SJ, Anderson JR, Treichel S, Chan EL, Bhatta S, Gansert J, Hodi FS, Gogas H. Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Global Phase III Trial of Talimogene Laherparepvec Combined With Pembrolizumab for Advanced Melanoma. J Clin Oncol. 2023 Jan 20;41(3):528-540. doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.00343. Epub 2022 Aug 23.

    PubMed 35998300
  • Watanabe D, Goshima F. Oncolytic Virotherapy by HSV. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2018;1045:63-84. doi: 10.1007/978-981-10-7230-7_4.

    PubMed 29896663

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Talimogene Laherparepvec and Pembrolizumab in people with Melanoma, run by Amgen at 161 sites in 21 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Nov 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 161 sites in United States, Germany, Australia, France, Poland and 16 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 16 May 2022). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Phase 1b: Number of Participants With Dose-limiting Toxicities (DLTs) (time frame: The DLT evaluation period was 6 weeks from the initial administration of pembrolizumab (week 6 to 12).). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02263508, which also lists 4 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Nov 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in