MelanomaPhase 3MASTERKEY-265NCT02263508
Pembrolizumab With Talimogene Laherparepvec or Placebo in Unresected Melanoma
A Phase 3 study testing Talimogene Laherparepvec and Pembrolizumab in people with Melanoma, run by Amgen at 161 sites in 21 countries.
Trial summary
The primary objectives of the Phase 1b part of the study are to evaluate the safety, as assessed by incidence of dose limiting toxicity (DLT), of talimogene laherparepvec in combination with pembrolizumab in adults with previously untreated, unresectable, stage IIIB to IVM1c melanoma. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 95 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Melanoma
- What is being tested?
- Talimogene Laherparepvec and Pembrolizumab
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 713 participants
- Where
- 161 sitesin 21 countries
- Study dates
- 8 Dec 2014to 11 Mar 2021
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 95 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age ≥ 18 years with histologically confirmed diagnosis of melanoma and stage IIIB to IVM1c for whom surgery is not recommended.
- Subjects must have measurable disease and be a candidate for intralesional therapy administration into cutaneous, subcutaneous, or nodal lesions.
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1.
- Adequate hematologic, hepatic, renal, and coagulation function.
- Subjects with serine/threonine protein kinase B-Raf V600 (BRAFV600) wild-type tumors must not have received any prior systemic anticancer treatment consisting of chemotherapy, immunotherapy, or targeted therapy given in a non-adjuvant setting for unresectable stage IIIB to IVM1c melanoma.
- Subjects with B-Raf V600 (BRAFV600) mutated tumors who have received prior BRAF inhibitor therapy either alone or in combination with mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK) inhibitor as their only prior systemic therapy are eligible.
- Subjects who received prior adjuvant therapy for melanoma will not be excluded (including, but not limited to, interferon, ipilimumab, limb infusion/perfusion, or use of investigational agents in the adjuvant setting) with the exception that prior adjuvant therapy with inhibitors of programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) or programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) is not allowed. However, if the subject received adjuvant therapy, the subject must have completed therapy at least 28 days prior to enrollment.
- Subjects must have a tumor sample that is adequate for PD-L1 assessment prior to randomization.
Who cannot join
- Subjects must not have clinically active cerebral metastases.
- Subjects must not have primary uveal or mucosal melanoma, history or evidence of melanoma associated with immunodeficiency states or history of other malignancy within the past 3 years.
- Subjects may not have been previously treated with talimogene laherparepvec, any other oncolytic virus, pembrolizumab, or any other inhibitor of PD-1, PD-L1, or PD-L2.
- Subjects must not have history or evidence of symptomatic autoimmune pneumonitis, glomerulonephritis, vasculitis, other symptomatic autoimmune disease, documented history of autoimmune disease or syndrome requiring systemic treatment in the past 2 years (ie, with use of disease modifying agents, steroids or immunosuppressive agents) except vitiligo or resolved childhood asthma/atopy, or evidence of clinically significant immunosuppression.
- Subjects must not have active herpetic skin lesions or prior complications of herpetic infection and must not require intermittent or chronic treatment with an antiherpetic drug (eg, acyclovir), other than intermittent topical use.
Trial locations and contacts
161 sites in 21 countries.
161 sites in 21 countries
United States41 sites
Research Site
Atlanta, Georgia, 30322
Research Site
Baltimore, Maryland, 21237
Research Site
Beverly Hills, California, 90211
Research Site
Birmingham, Alabama, 35243
Research Site
Boston, Massachusetts, 02215
Research Site
Buffalo, New York, 14263
Research Site
Chicago, Illinois, 60611
Research Site
Chicago, Illinois, 60637
Research Site
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45209
Research Site
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195
Research Site
Dallas, Texas, 75246
Research Site
Detroit, Michigan, 48201
Research Site
Duarte, California, 91010
Research Site
Encinitas, California, 92024
Research Site
Fridley, Minnesota, 55432
Research Site
Germantown, Tennessee, 38138
Research Site
Hackensack, New Jersey, 07601
Research Site
Knoxville, Tennessee, 37920
Research Site
La Jolla, California, 92037
Research Site
Los Angeles, California, 90024
Research Site
Los Angeles, California, 90025
Research Site
Louisville, Kentucky, 40202
Research Site
Miami, Florida, 33136
Research Site
Miami Beach, Florida, 33140
Research Site
Mobile, Alabama, 36608
Research Site
Murray, Utah, 84107
Research Site
Nashville, Tennessee, 37232
Research Site
New York, New York, 10016
Research Site
New York, New York, 10032
Research Site
New York, New York, 10065
Research Site
Orlando, Florida, 32806
Research Site
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107
Research Site
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19111
Research Site
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15232
Research Site
Riverside, California, 92505
Research Site
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84112
Research Site
San Francisco, California, 94115
Research Site
San Francisco, California, 94117
Research Site
Santa Monica, California, 90404
Research Site
Seattle, Washington, 98109-1023
Research Site
St Louis, Missouri, 63110-1093
Germany14 sites
Research Site
Berlin, 10117
Research Site
Dresden, 01307
Research Site
Erlangen, 91054
Research Site
Essen, 45147
Research Site
Hanover, 30625
Research Site
Heidelberg, 69120
Research Site
Kiel, 24105
Research Site
Leipzig, 04103
Research Site
Mainz, 55131
Research Site
Mannheim, 68167
Research Site
München, 80337
Research Site
Regensburg, 93053
Research Site
Tübingen, 72076
Research Site
Würzburg, 97080
Australia11 sites
Research Site
Geelong, Victoria, 3220
Research Site
Heidelberg, Victoria, 3084
Research Site
Melbourne, Victoria, 3000
Research Site
Murdoch, Western Australia, 6150
Research Site
North Sydney, New South Wales, 2060
Research Site
Prahran, Victoria, 3181
Research Site
Southport, Queensland, 4215
Research Site
Waratah, New South Wales, 2298
Research Site
Wollongong, New South Wales, 2500
Research Site
Woodville South, South Australia, 5011
Research Site
Woolloongabba, Queensland, 4102
France10 sites
Research Site
Bordeaux, 33075
Research Site
Grenoble, 38043
Research Site
Lille, 59037
Research Site
Lyon, 69373
Research Site
Marseille, 13385
Research Site
Nantes, 44093
Research Site
Paris, 75010
Research Site
Pierre-Bénite, 69495
Research Site
Toulouse, 31059
Research Site
Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, 54511
Poland10 sites
Research Site
Bielsko-Biala, 43-300
Research Site
Bydgoszcz, 85-796
Research Site
Gdansk, 80-952
Research Site
Konin, 62-500
Research Site
Krakow, 31-501
Research Site
Poznan, 60-848
Research Site
Poznan, 61-866
Research Site
Szczecin, 71-730
Research Site
Warsaw, 02-781
Research Site
Wroclaw, 50-368
United Kingdom10 sites
Research Site
Birmingham, B15 2TH
Research Site
Guildford, GU2 7XX
Research Site
Leeds, LS9 7TF
Research Site
Leicester, LE1 5WW
Research Site
London, SE1 9RT
Research Site
London, SW3 6JJ
Research Site
Manchester, M20 4BX
Research Site
Oxford, OX3 7LJ
Research Site
Preston, PR2 9HT
Research Site
Southampton, SO16 6YD
Spain8 sites
Research Site
Badalona, Catalonia, 08916
Research Site
Barcelona, Catalonia, 08036
Research Site
Donostia / San Sebastian, Basque Country, 20014
Research Site
Madrid, 28009
Research Site
Madrid, 28046
Research Site
Madrid, 28050
Research Site
Pamplona, Navarre, 31008
Research Site
Valencia, Valencia, 46014
Canada7 sites
Research Site
Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 1Z2
Research Site
Kingston, Ontario, K7L 2V7
Research Site
London, Ontario, N6A 4L6
Research Site
Montreal, Quebec, H3T 1E2
Research Site
Ottawa, Ontario, K1H 8L6
Research Site
Québec, Quebec, G1R 2J6
Research Site
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2M9
Czechia6 sites
Research Site
Brno, 656 53
Research Site
Olomouc, 775 20
Research Site
Ostrava-Poruba, 708 52
Research Site
Prague, 100 34
Research Site
Prague, 128 08
Research Site
Prague, 180 81
Italy6 sites
Research Site
Bergamo, 24127
Research Site
Brescia, 25123
Research Site
Meldola FC, 47014
Research Site
Milan, 20133
Research Site
Milan, 20141
Research Site
Siena, 53100
South Africa6 sites
Research Site
Groenkloof, Gauteng, 0181
Research Site
Johannesburg, Gauteng, 2196
Research Site
Kraaifontein, 7570
Research Site
Parktown, Gauteng, 2193
Research Site
Pretoria, 0002
Research Site
Pretoria, 0081
Greece5 sites
Research Site
Athens, 11527
Research Site
Athens, 18547
Research Site
Heraklion - Crete, 71110
Research Site
Ioannina, 45500
Research Site
Thessaloniki, 54622
Switzerland5 sites
Research Site
Bellinzona, 6500
Research Site
Bern, 3010
Research Site
Geneva, 1211
Research Site
Lausanne, 1011
Research Site
Zurich, 8091
Austria4 sites
Research Site
Graz, 8036
Research Site
Innsbruck, 6020
Research Site
Salzburg, 5020
Research Site
Vienna, 1090
Netherlands4 sites
Research Site
Amsterdam, 1066 CX
Research Site
Amsterdam, 1081 HV
Research Site
Groningen, 9713 GZ
Research Site
Nijmegen, 6525 GA
Portugal4 sites
Research Site
Almada, 2801-951
Research Site
Lisbon, 1099-023
Research Site
Lisbon, 1649-035
Research Site
Porto, 4200-072
Hungary3 sites
Research Site
Budapest, 1122
Research Site
Pécs, 7632
Research Site
Szeged, 6720
Russia2 sites
Research Site
Moscow, 115478
Research Site
Saint Petersburg, 197758
About this study
Official title: A Phase 1b/3, Multicenter, Trial of Talimogene Laherparepvec in Combination With Pembrolizumab (MK-3475) for Treatment of Unresectable Stage IIIB to IVM1c Melanoma (MASTERKEY-265)
The primary objectives of the Phase 1b part of the study are to evaluate the safety, as assessed by incidence of dose limiting toxicity (DLT), of talimogene laherparepvec in combination with pembrolizumab in adults with previously untreated, unresectable, stage IIIB to IVM1c melanoma.
The primary objective of Phase 3 are to evaluate the efficacy of talimogene laherparepvec with pembrolizumab versus placebo with pembrolizumab, as assessed by progression-free survival (PFS) (response evaluation by blinded independent central review using modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors [RECIST] 1.1) and overall survival (OS).
- Conditions
- Melanoma
- Being tested
- Talimogene Laherparepvec, Pembrolizumab, Placebo
- Keywords
- Talimogene Laherparepvec, pembrolizumab, KEYNOTE-034, MASTERKEY-265
- Medical subject headings
- Melanoma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Talimogene LaherparepvecDrug
Also called IMLYGIC®, OncoVEX^GM-CSF, T-VEC
Talimogene laherparepvec administered by intratumoral injection
PembrolizumabDrug
Also called MK-3475, Keytruda®
Administered at a dose of 200 mg as an intravenous infusion over approximately 30 minutes.
PlaceboDrug
Administered by intratumoral injection
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Phase 1b: Talimogene Laherparepvec + Pembrolizumab | Experimental | Participants received talimogene laherparepvec at an initial dose of up to 4 mL 10⁶ plaque-forming units (PFU)/mL by intralesional injection. Subsequent doses of talimogene laherparepvec at up to 4 mL of 10⁸ PFU/mL began 3 weeks after the first dose and were administered every 2 weeks until disappearance of injectable lesions, complete response (CR), confirmed disease progression (PD) per modified Immune-related Response Criteria (irRC), intolerance of study treatment, 24 months from the date of the first dose of pembrolizumab, or end of study, whichever occurred first. Participants also received 200 mg pembrolizumab administered intravenously every 2 weeks starting at the time of the third dose of talimogene laherparepvec (week 6) until confirmed PD per modified irRC, treatment intolerance, 24 months from the first dose, or end of study, whichever occurred first. Receives: Drug: Talimogene Laherparepvec; Drug: Pembrolizumab |
| Phase 3 : Placebo + Pembrolizumab | Placebo comparator | Participants received up to 4 mL placebo to talimogene laherparepvec by intralesional injection on day 1 of week 0. Subsequent doses of placebo (up to 4 mL) began 3 weeks after the first dose and were administered every 2 weeks until the fifth injection (week 9), and then synchronously with pembrolizumab thereafter every 3 weeks until disappearance of injectable lesions, complete response per modified Immune-related Response Criteria simulating Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (irRC-RECIST) (iCR), confirmed iPD per modified irRC-RECIST, intolerance of study treatment, 24 months from the date of the first dose of placebo, or end of study, whichever occurred first. Participants also received 200 mg pembrolizumab administered intravenously every 3 weeks starting on day 1 of week 0, until confirmed iPD per modified irRC-RECIST, treatment intolerance, 24 months from the first dose, or end of study, whichever occurred first. Receives: Drug: Pembrolizumab; Drug: Placebo |
| Phase 3: Talimogene Laherparepvec + Pembrolizumab | Experimental | Participants received talimogene laherparepvec at an initial dose of up to 4 mL 10⁶ PFU/mL by intralesional injection on day 1. Subsequent doses of talimogene laherparepvec at 10⁸ PFU/mL (up to 4 mL) began 3 weeks after the first dose and were administered every 2 weeks until the fifth injection of talimogene laherparepvec (week 9), and then synchronously with pembrolizumab thereafter every 3 weeks until disappearance of injectable lesions, iCR, confirmed iPD per modified irRC-RECIST, intolerance of study treatment, 24 months from the date of the first dose of talimogene laherparepvec, or end of study, whichever occurred first. Participants also received 200 mg pembrolizumab administered intravenously every 3 weeks starting on day 1 of week 0, until confirmed iPD per modified irRC-RECIST, treatment intolerance, 24 months from the first dose, or end of study, whichever occurred first. Receives: Drug: Talimogene Laherparepvec; Drug: Pembrolizumab |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Phase 1b: Number of Participants With Dose-limiting Toxicities (DLTs)
A DLT was defined as any toxicity related to study drug which met any of the following criteria based on Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0:
- Grade 4 non-hematologic toxicity.
- Grade 3 or higher pneumonitis.
- Grade 3 non-hematologic toxicity lasting > 3 days despite optimal supportive care, excluding grade 3 fatigue.
- Any grade 3 or higher non-hematologic laboratory value if medical intervention was required, or the abnormality lead to hospitalization, or the abnormality persisted for > 1 week.
- Febrile neutropenia grade 3 or grade 4.
- Thrombocytopenia < 25 x 10^9/L if associated with a bleeding event which does not result in hemodynamic instability but required an elective platelet infusion, or a life-threatening bleeding event which resulted in urgent intervention and admission to intensive care unit.
- Grade 5 toxicity (ie, death).
- Any other intolerable toxicity leading to permanent discontinuation of talimogene laherparepvec or pembrolizumab.
Measured: The DLT evaluation period was 6 weeks from the initial administration of pembrolizumab (week 6 to 12).
Phase 3: Progression Free Survival (PFS) by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) Assessed Using Modified RECIST 1.1
PFS per modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 is defined as the interval from randomization to the earlier event of progressive disease (PD) per modified RECIST 1.1 or death from any cause.
PD: Increase in size of target lesions from nadir by ≥ 20% and ≥ 5 mm absolute increase above nadir, or the appearance of a new lesion.
Median PFS was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Participants without an event were censored at their last evaluable tumor assessment if available; otherwise on their randomization date.
The primary analysis of PFS was specified to be conducted when 407 PFS events had occurred (data cut-off date 02 March 2020).
Measured: From randomization until the data-cut-off date of 02 March 2020; median (range) time on follow-up was 25.5 (0.6, 44.7) months in the Placebo + Pembrolizumab arm and 25.6 (0.3, 45.8) months in the Talimogene Laherparepvec + Pembrolizumab arm.
Phase 3: Overall Survival
Overall survival (OS) is defined as the interval from randomization to death from any cause.
Median overall survival was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Participants without an event were censored at their last known alive date.
Measured: From randomization until the end of study; median (range) time on follow-up was 34.8 (0.6, 58.3) months in the Placebo + Pembrolizumab arm and 36.8 (0.3, 58.4) months in the Talimogene Laherparepvec + Pembrolizumab arm.
Secondary outcomes (22)
Phase 1b: Objective Response Rate (ORR)
ORR is defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) using the modified Immune-related Response Criteria (irRC), by Investigator assessment.
CR was defined as the disappearance of all lesions; PR was defined as a decrease in tumor area ≥ 50% relative to baseline, response must have been confirmed by a second, consecutive assessment at least 4 weeks apart.
Radiographic imaging for assessment of lesions was performed using computed tomography (CT), positron emission tomography (PET), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), or ultrasound. Clinical measurement of cutaneous, subcutaneous, and palpable nodal tumor lesions was conducted with calipers.
Measured: Tumor assessments were performed at week 6 (prior to initiation of pembrolizumab), week 18, and every 12 weeks thereafter until confirmed PD or start of new anticancer treatment; median (range) time on follow-up was 58.6 (1.4, 61.6) months.
Phase 1b: Best Overall Response (BOR)
Best overall response is defined as the best overall visit response in the following order: CR, PR, stable disease (SD), progressive disease (PD), or unevaluable (UE), based on investigator assessment using the modified irRC up to the start of any subsequent anti-cancer therapy.
CR was defined as the disappearance of all lesions; PR was defined as a decrease in tumor area ≥ 50% relative to baseline; PD was defined as an increase in tumor area ≥ 25% relative to nadir; and SD was defined as any outcome not meeting the criteria for response or PD with ≥ 77 days elapsed after enrollment. Responses and PD must have been confirmed by a second, consecutive assessment at least 4 weeks apart.
Measured: Tumor assessments were performed at week 6 (prior to initiation of pembrolizumab), week 18, and every 12 weeks thereafter until confirmed PD or start of new anticancer treatment; median (range) time on follow-up was 58.6 (1.4, 61.6) months.
Phase 1b: Durable Response Rate (DRR)
DRR is defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall response of CR or PR using the modified irRC per Investigator assessment with a duration of response of at least 6 months.
CR was defined as the disappearance of all lesions; PR was defined as a decrease in tumor area ≥ 50% relative to baseline, response must have been confirmed by a second, consecutive assessment at least 4 weeks apart.
Measured: Tumor assessments were performed at week 6 (prior to initiation of pembrolizumab), week 18, and every 12 weeks thereafter until confirmed PD or start of new anticancer treatment; median (range) time on follow-up was 58.6 (1.4, 61.6) months.
Phase 1b: Duration of Response (DOR)
Duration of response (DOR) is defined as the time from the date of an initial response (CR or PR) that is subsequently confirmed to the earlier of confirmed PD or death. Participants who had not ended their response at the time of analysis were censored at their last evaluable tumor assessment before start of the first subsequent anticancer therapy.
CR was defined as the disappearance of all lesions; PR was defined as a decrease in tumor area ≥ 50% relative to baseline; PD was defined as an increase in tumor area ≥ 25% relative to nadir. Response and PD must have been confirmed by a second, consecutive assessment at least 4 weeks apart.
Measured: Tumor assessments were performed at week 6 (prior to initiation of pembrolizumab), week 18, and every 12 weeks thereafter until confirmed PD or start of new anticancer treatment; median (range) time on follow-up was 58.6 (1.4, 61.6) months.
Phase 1b: Disease Control Rate (DCR)
DCR is defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall response of CR, PR, or SD using the modified irRC per Investigator assessment.
CR was defined as the disappearance of all lesions; PR was defined as a decrease in tumor area ≥ 50% relative to baseline, response must have been confirmed by a second, consecutive assessment at least 4 weeks apart; and SD was defined as any outcome not meeting the criteria for response or PD with ≥ 84 days elapsed after enrollment.
Measured: Tumor assessments were performed at week 6 (prior to initiation of pembrolizumab), week 18, and every 12 weeks thereafter until confirmed PD or start of new anticancer treatment; median (range) time on follow-up was 58.6 (1.4, 61.6) months.
Phase 1b: Progression-free Survival (PFS)
Progression-free survival is defined as the time from first dose to the earlier event of confirmed PD per modified irRC or death from any cause. PFS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Participants without an event were censored at their last evaluable tumor assessment.
Measured: From first dose until the end of study; median (range) time on follow-up was 70.6 (1.4, 74.5) months.
Phase 1b: Overall Survival (OS)
Overall survival is defined as the interval from first dose to death from any cause.
OS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Participants without an event were censored at their last known alive date.
Measured: From first dose until the end of study; median (range) time on follow-up was 70.6 (1.4, 74.5) months.
Phase 3: Complete Response Rate Assessed Using Modified irRC-RECIST (iCRR)
Complete response rate per modified Immune-related Response Criteria (irRC) simulating RECIST 1.1 (irRC-RECIST) is defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall response of complete response assessed using the modified irRC-RECIST (iCR) evaluated by blinded independent central review.
iCR: Disappearance of all lesions (whether measurable or not and whether baseline or new) and confirmation by a repeat, consecutive assessment at least 4 weeks after the criteria were first met. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to <10 mm.
Modifications to the irRC-RECIST 1.1 included an increase in the total number of target lesions and new measurable lesions to 10 with a maximum of 5 target lesions per organ, and target lesions must have been measurable by CT or MRI only.
Measured: Tumor assessments were performed every 12 weeks after initiation of treatment until confirmed PD or start of new anticancer treatment; median (range) time on follow-up was 30.6 (0.6, 53.0) months and 31.4 (0.3, 52.5) months in each group, respectively.
Phase 3: Progression Free Survival Assessed Using Modified irRC-RECIST (iPFS)
PFS per modified irRC-RECIST is defined as the interval from randomization to the earlier event of progressive disease assessed by modified irRC-RECIST (iPD) evaluated by blinded independent central review, or death from any cause.
iPD: Increase in tumor burden ≥ 20% and at least 5 mm absolute increase relative to nadir (minimum recorded tumor burden) confirmed by a repeat, consecutive assessment at least 4 weeks after the initial detection.
Median iPFS was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Participants without an event were censored at their last evaluable tumor assessment if available; otherwise on their randomization date.
The primary analysis of iPFS was specified to be conducted when 256 iPFS events had occurred (data cut-off date 29 September 2020).
Measured: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 29 September 2020; median time on follow-up was 30.6 (0.6, 53.0) months in the Placebo + Pembrolizumab arm and 31.4 (0.3, 52.5) months in the Talimogene Laherparepvec + Pembrolizumab arm.
Phase 3: Overall Survival Excluding Stage IVM1c Participants
Overall survival is defined as the interval from randomization to death from any cause.
Median OS was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Participants without an event were censored at the last known alive date.
Measured: From randomization until the end of study; median (range) time on follow-up was 34.8 (0.6, 58.3) months in the Placebo + Pembrolizumab arm and 36.8 (0.3, 58.4) months in the Talimogene Laherparepvec + Pembrolizumab arm.
Phase 3: Objective Response Rate Assessed Using Modified RECIST 1.1
ORR is defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) assessed using modified RECIST version 1.1, evaluated by blinded independent central review.
CR was defined as the disappearance of all lesions except lymph node short axis < 10 mm; PR was defined as a ≥ 30% reduction in sum of diameters in target lesions. Confirmation of CR or PR was not required.
Modifications to conventional RECIST 1.1 included the following: target lesions were measurable on CT or MRI; otherwise, they were considered as nontarget lesions. A maximum of 10 target lesions was allowed with up to 5 per organ.
Measured: Tumor assessments were performed every 12 weeks after initiation of treatment until confirmed PD or start of new anticancer treatment; median (range) time on follow-up was 30.6 (0.6, 53.0) months and 31.4 (0.3, 52.5) months in each group, respectively.
Phase 3: Best Overall Response Assessed Using Modified RECIST 1.1
BOR is defined as the best overall visit response up to and including the first overall visit response of PD in the following order: CR, PR, SD, non-CR/Non-PD (NN), PD or UE per modified RECIST 1.1, evaluated by BICR.
CR: Disappearance of all lesions except lymph node short axis < 10 mm; PR: ≥ 30% reduction in sum of diameters in target lesions. Confirmation of CR or PR was not required; NN: Persistence of ≥ 1 non-target lesions and/or maintenance of tumor marker level above normal limits; SD: Neither sufficient shrinkage of target lesions to qualify for CR or PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD and ≥ 84 days from randomization; PD: Increase from nadir by ≥ 20% or ≥ 5 mm of target lesions or any new lesion; Missing: No postbaseline assessment, or assessments on or after the start of first subsequent anticancer therapy, including complete or partial removal/reduction of any target lesion which contained melanoma on pathology evaluation or pathology results were unknown.
Measured: Tumor assessments were performed every 12 weeks after initiation of treatment until confirmed PD or start of new anticancer treatment; median (range) time on follow-up was 30.6 (0.6, 53.0) months and 31.4 (0.3, 52.5) months in each group, respectively.
Phase 3: Durable Response Rate (DRR) Assessed Using Modified RECIST 1.1
DRR is defined as the percentage of participants with a CR or PR per modified RECIST 1.1 evaluated by blinded independent central review, with a duration of response of ≥ 6 months.
CR was defined as the disappearance of all lesions except lymph node short axis < 10 mm; PR was defined as a ≥ 30% reduction in sum of diameters in target lesions. Confirmation of CR or PR was not required.
Measured: Tumor assessments were performed every 12 weeks after initiation of treatment until confirmed PD or start of new anticancer treatment; median (range) time on follow-up was 30.6 (0.6, 53.0) months and 31.4 (0.3, 52.5) months in each group, respectively.
Phase 3: Duration of Response (DOR) Assessed Using Modified RECIST 1.1
Duration of response (DOR) is defined as the time from the date of an initial response of CR or PR to the earlier of PD per modified RECIST 1.1, or death. Participants who had not ended their response at the time of analysis were censored at their last evaluable tumor assessment date before start of the first subsequent anticancer therapy.
CR was defined as the disappearance of all lesions except lymph node short axis < 10 mm; PR was defined as a ≥ 30% reduction in sum of diameters in target lesions. Confirmation of CR or PR was not required. PD was defined as an increase from nadir by ≥ 20% or ≥ 5 mm absolute increase above nadir of target lesions or appearance of any new lesion.
Measured: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 29 September 2020; median time on follow-up was 30.6 (0.6, 53.0) months in the Placebo + Pembrolizumab arm and 31.4 (0.3, 52.5) months in the Talimogene Laherparepvec + Pembrolizumab arm.
Phase 3: Disease Control Rate (DCR) Assessed Using RECIST 1.1
Disease control rate (DCR) per modified RECIST 1.1 is defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall response of CR, PR or SD evaluated by blinded independent central review.
CR was defined as the disappearance of all lesions except lymph node short axis < 10 mm; PR was defined as a ≥ 30% reduction in sum of diameters in target lesions. Confirmation of CR or PR was not required. SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage of target lesions to qualify for CR or PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD with ≥ 84 days elapsed after randomization.
Measured: Tumor assessments were performed every 12 weeks after initiation of treatment until confirmed PD or start of new anticancer treatment; median (range) time on follow-up was 30.6 (0.6, 53.0) months and 31.4 (0.3, 52.5) months in each group, respectively.
Phase 3: Objective Response Rate Assessed Using Modified irRC-RECIST (iORR)
Objective response rate per modified irRC-RECIST is defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall response of iCR or partial response assessed using modified irRC-RECIST (iPR) evaluated by blinded independent central review.
iCR: Disappearance of all lesions (whether measurable or not and whether baseline or new) and confirmation by a repeat, consecutive assessment at least 4 weeks from the date first documented. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to <10 mm.
iPR: Decrease in tumor burden ≥ 30% relative to baseline confirmed by a consecutive assessment at least 4 weeks after first documentation.
Modifications to the irRC-RECIST 1.1 included an increase in the total number of target lesions and new measurable lesions to 10 with a maximum of 5 target lesions per organ, and target lesions must be measurable by CT or MRI only.
Measured: Tumor assessments were performed every 12 weeks after initiation of treatment until confirmed PD or start of new anticancer treatment; median (range) time on follow-up was 30.6 (0.6, 53.0) months and 31.4 (0.3, 52.5) months in each group, respectively.
Phase 3: Best Overall Response Assessed Using Modified irRC-RECIST
BOR is defined as the best overall visit response in the following order: iCR, iPR, stable disease per modified irRC-RECIST (iSD), iPD, or UE per modified irRC-RECIST (iUE), evaluated by BICR.
iCR: Disappearance of all lesions confirmed by consecutive assessment ≥ 4 weeks from the date first documented. Reduction of any pathological lymph node to <10 mm.
iPR: Decrease in tumor burden ≥ 30% relative to baseline confirmed ≥ 4 weeks after first documentation.
iPD: Increase in tumor burden ≥ 20 % and at least 5 mm absolute increase relative to nadir confirmed ≥ 4 weeks from initial detection.
iSD: Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for iCR or iPR nor sufficient increase to qualify for iPD and ≥ 84 days from randomization.
Missing: No postbaseline assessment, or assessments after start of first subsequent anticancer therapy, including complete or partial removal/reduction of any target lesion which contained melanoma on pathology evaluation or pathology results were unknown.
Measured: Tumor assessments were performed every 12 weeks after initiation of treatment until confirmed PD or start of new anticancer treatment; median (range) time on follow-up was 30.6 (0.6, 53.0) months and 31.4 (0.3, 52.5) months in each group, respectively.
Phase 3: Durable Response Rate Assessed Using Modified irRC-RECIST (iDRR)
Durable response rate per modified irRC-RECIST is defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall response of iCR or iPR per modified irRC-RECIST evaluated by blinded independent central review with a duration of response ≥ 6 months.
iCR: Disappearance of all lesions (whether measurable or not and whether baseline or new) and confirmation by a repeat, consecutive assessment at least 4 weeks from the date first documented. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to <10 mm.
iPR: Decrease in tumor burden ≥ 30% relative to baseline confirmed by a consecutive assessment at least 4 weeks after first documentation.
Measured: Tumor assessments were performed every 12 weeks after initiation of treatment until confirmed PD or start of new anticancer treatment; median (range) time on follow-up was 30.6 (0.6, 53.0) months and 31.4 (0.3, 52.5) months in each group, respectively.
Phase 3: Duration of Response Assessed Using Modified irRC-RECIST (iDOR)
Duration of response per modified irRC-RECIST is defined as the time from the date of an initial response of iCR or iPR that was subsequently confirmed to the earlier of iPD per modified irRC-RECIST evaluated by blinded independent central review, or death. Participants who had not ended their response at the time of analysis were censored at their last evaluable tumor assessment date before the start of the first subsequent anticancer therapy.
iCR: Disappearance of all lesions (whether measurable or not and whether baseline or new) and confirmation by a repeat, consecutive assessment at least 4 weeks from the date first documented. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to <10 mm.
iPR: Decrease in tumor burden ≥ 30% relative to baseline confirmed by a consecutive assessment at least 4 weeks after first documentation.
Measured: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 29 September 2020; median time on follow-up was 30.6 (0.6, 53.0) months in the Placebo + Pembrolizumab arm and 31.4 (0.3, 52.5) months in the Talimogene Laherparepvec + Pembrolizumab arm.
Phase 3: Disease Control Rate Assessed Using Modified irRC-RECIST (iDCR)
Disease control rate per modified irRC-RECIST is defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall response of iCR, iCR, or iSD assessed using modified irRC-RECIST evaluated by blinded independent central review.
iCR: Disappearance of all lesions (whether measurable or not and whether baseline or new) and confirmation by a repeat, consecutive assessment at least 4 weeks from the date first documented. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to <10 mm.
iPR: Decrease in tumor burden ≥ 30% relative to baseline confirmed by a consecutive assessment at least 4 weeks after first documentation.
iSD: Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for iCR or iPR nor sufficient increase to qualify for iPD with ≥ 84 days elapsed after randomization.
Measured: Tumor assessments were performed every 12 weeks after initiation of treatment until confirmed PD or start of new anticancer treatment; median (range) time on follow-up was 30.6 (0.6, 53.0) months and 31.4 (0.3, 52.5) months in each group, respectively.
Phase 3: Change From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Module (EORTC QLQ-C30) Global Health Status (GHS)/Quality of Life (QOL) Score
The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status/quality of life scale, 5 functional scales, and 9 symptom scales/items.
The global health/QoL scale consists of 2 questions that ask participants to rate their overall health and overall quality of life during the past week on a scale from 1 (very poor) to 7 (excellent). The GHS/QoL subscale score was derived as the mean of each score then transformed to a scale from 0 to 100 where higher scores represent a better health status and a positive change from baseline indicates improvement.
The overall change from baseline (calculated from all on-treatment visits) was calculated using a restricted maximum likelihood-based mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM) (see model details in statistical analysis section).
Measured: Baseline and day 1 of weeks 3, 6, 9, 12, then every 6 weeks until end of study treatment; median (range) duration of treatment was 39.0 (0.1, 107.3) weeks in Placebo + Pembrolizumab and 54.1 (0.1, 109.6) weeks in Talimogene Laherparepvec + Pembrolizumab.
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical trial subject, including worsening of a pre-existing medical condition. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with study treatment. TEAEs include AEs from the first dose of study drug to 30 days after the last dose.
A serious adverse event (SAE) is an AE that met at least 1 of the following criteria:
- fatal
- life threatening
- required in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization
- resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity
- congenital anomaly/birth defect
- other medically important serious event. Treatment-emergent SAEs are any SAE occurring from first dose of study drug through 90 days after the last dose or 30 days after the last dose if new anticancer therapy was started, whichever was earlier.
AEs were graded for severity using CTCAE version 4.0, where Grade 1 = Mild; Grade 2 = Moderate; Grade 3 = Severe; Grade 4 = Life-threatening; Grade 5 = Fatal.
Measured: From first dose to 30 days after last dose (90 days for SAEs); median (range) duration was 48 (5.1, 110.1) weeks in Phase 1b, 39 (0.1, 107.3) weeks in Placebo + Pembrolizumab and 56 (0.1, 109.6) weeks in Phase 3 Talimogene Laherparepvec + Pembrolizumab.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Oct 2014 (estimated)
- Study start8 Dec 2014
- Primary completion11 Mar 2021
- Study completion11 Mar 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for MelanomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by AmgenThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Phase 1b was an open-label, single-arm study. Phase 3 was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study design.
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 713 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Amgen
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- MD, Study director, Amgen
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02263508
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 20110265
- Other IDs
- 2014-000185-22, KEYNOTE-034, 2014
- Acronym
- MASTERKEY-265
- Status last verified
- Nov 2022
- First submitted
- 26 Sep 2014
- Last updated
- 14 Nov 2022
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: De-identified individual patient data for variables necessary to address the specific research question in an approved data sharing request
Publications
Ribas A, Dummer R, Puzanov I, VanderWalde A, Andtbacka RHI, Michielin O, Olszanski AJ, Malvehy J, Cebon J, Fernandez E, Kirkwood JM, Gajewski TF, Chen L, Gorski KS, Anderson AA, Diede SJ, Lassman ME, Gansert J, Hodi FS, Long GV. Oncolytic Virotherapy Promotes Intratumoral T Cell Infiltration and Improves Anti-PD-1 Immunotherapy. Cell. 2017 Sep 7;170(6):1109-1119.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.08.027.
PubMed 28886381Dummer R, Hoeller C, Gruter IP, Michielin O. Combining talimogene laherparepvec with immunotherapies in melanoma and other solid tumors. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2017 Jun;66(6):683-695. doi: 10.1007/s00262-017-1967-1. Epub 2017 Feb 25.
PubMed 28238174Chesney JA, Ribas A, Long GV, Kirkwood JM, Dummer R, Puzanov I, Hoeller C, Gajewski TF, Gutzmer R, Rutkowski P, Demidov L, Arenberger P, Shin SJ, Ferrucci PF, Haydon A, Hyngstrom J, van Thienen JV, Haferkamp S, Guilera JM, Rapoport BL, VanderWalde A, Diede SJ, Anderson JR, Treichel S, Chan EL, Bhatta S, Gansert J, Hodi FS, Gogas H. Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Global Phase III Trial of Talimogene Laherparepvec Combined With Pembrolizumab for Advanced Melanoma. J Clin Oncol. 2023 Jan 20;41(3):528-540. doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.00343. Epub 2022 Aug 23.
PubMed 35998300Watanabe D, Goshima F. Oncolytic Virotherapy by HSV. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2018;1045:63-84. doi: 10.1007/978-981-10-7230-7_4.
PubMed 29896663
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 14 Nov 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase 1b/3, Multicenter, Trial of Talimogene Laherparepvec in Combination With Pembrolizumab (MK-3475) for Treatment of Unresectable Stage IIIB to IVM1c Melanoma (MASTERKEY-265)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02263508
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MASTERKEY-265 / 20110265
- Conditions
- Melanoma
- Keywords
- Talimogene Laherparepvec, pembrolizumab, KEYNOTE-034, MASTERKEY-265
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Terminated
- Enrolment
- 713 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- AmgenIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
- Study start
- 8 Dec 2014 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 11 Mar 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 11 Mar 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 13 Oct 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 16 May 2022
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The primary objectives of the Phase 1b part of the study are to evaluate the safety, as assessed by incidence of dose limiting toxicity (DLT), of talimogene laherparepvec in combination with pembrolizumab in adults with previously untreated, unresectable, stage IIIB to IVM1c melanoma.
The primary objective of Phase 3 are to evaluate the efficacy of talimogene laherparepvec with pembrolizumab versus placebo with pembrolizumab, as assessed by progression-free survival (PFS) (response evaluation by blinded independent central review using modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors [RECIST] 1.1) and overall survival (OS).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 3
- Model description
- Phase 1b was an open-label, single-arm study. Phase 3 was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study design.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Phase 1b: Talimogene Laherparepvec + Pembrolizumab | Experimental | Drug: Talimogene Laherparepvec, Drug: PembrolizumabParticipants received talimogene laherparepvec at an initial dose of up to 4 mL 10⁶ plaque-forming units (PFU)/mL by intralesional injection. Subsequent doses of talimogene laherparepvec at up to 4 mL of 10⁸ PFU/mL began 3 weeks after the first dose and were administered every 2 weeks until disappearance of injectable lesions, complete response (CR), confirmed disease progression (PD) per modified Immune-related Response Criteria (irRC), intolerance of study treatment, 24 months from the date of the first dose of pembrolizumab, or end of study, whichever occurred first. Participants also received 200 mg pembrolizumab administered intravenously every 2 weeks starting at the time of the third dose of talimogene laherparepvec (week 6) until confirmed PD per modified irRC, treatment intolerance, 24 months from the first dose, or end of study, whichever occurred first. |
| Phase 3 : Placebo + Pembrolizumab | Placebo comparator | Drug: Pembrolizumab, Drug: PlaceboParticipants received up to 4 mL placebo to talimogene laherparepvec by intralesional injection on day 1 of week 0. Subsequent doses of placebo (up to 4 mL) began 3 weeks after the first dose and were administered every 2 weeks until the fifth injection (week 9), and then synchronously with pembrolizumab thereafter every 3 weeks until disappearance of injectable lesions, complete response per modified Immune-related Response Criteria simulating Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (irRC-RECIST) (iCR), confirmed iPD per modified irRC-RECIST, intolerance of study treatment, 24 months from the date of the first dose of placebo, or end of study, whichever occurred first. Participants also received 200 mg pembrolizumab administered intravenously every 3 weeks starting on day 1 of week 0, until confirmed iPD per modified irRC-RECIST, treatment intolerance, 24 months from the first dose, or end of study, whichever occurred first. |
| Phase 3: Talimogene Laherparepvec + Pembrolizumab | Experimental | Drug: Talimogene Laherparepvec, Drug: PembrolizumabParticipants received talimogene laherparepvec at an initial dose of up to 4 mL 10⁶ PFU/mL by intralesional injection on day 1. Subsequent doses of talimogene laherparepvec at 10⁸ PFU/mL (up to 4 mL) began 3 weeks after the first dose and were administered every 2 weeks until the fifth injection of talimogene laherparepvec (week 9), and then synchronously with pembrolizumab thereafter every 3 weeks until disappearance of injectable lesions, iCR, confirmed iPD per modified irRC-RECIST, intolerance of study treatment, 24 months from the date of the first dose of talimogene laherparepvec, or end of study, whichever occurred first. Participants also received 200 mg pembrolizumab administered intravenously every 3 weeks starting on day 1 of week 0, until confirmed iPD per modified irRC-RECIST, treatment intolerance, 24 months from the first dose, or end of study, whichever occurred first. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 95 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Age ≥ 18 years with histologically confirmed diagnosis of melanoma and stage IIIB to IVM1c for whom surgery is not recommended.
- Subjects must have measurable disease and be a candidate for intralesional therapy administration into cutaneous, subcutaneous, or nodal lesions.
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1.
- Adequate hematologic, hepatic, renal, and coagulation function.
- Subjects with serine/threonine protein kinase B-Raf V600 (BRAFV600) wild-type tumors must not have received any prior systemic anticancer treatment consisting of chemotherapy, immunotherapy, or targeted therapy given in a non-adjuvant setting for unresectable stage IIIB to IVM1c melanoma.
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Subjects must not have clinically active cerebral metastases.
- Subjects must not have primary uveal or mucosal melanoma, history or evidence of melanoma associated with immunodeficiency states or history of other malignancy within the past 3 years.
- Subjects may not have been previously treated with talimogene laherparepvec, any other oncolytic virus, pembrolizumab, or any other inhibitor of PD-1, PD-L1, or PD-L2.
- Subjects must not have history or evidence of symptomatic autoimmune pneumonitis, glomerulonephritis, vasculitis, other symptomatic autoimmune disease, documented history of autoimmune disease or syndrome requiring systemic treatment in the past 2 years (ie, with use of disease modifying agents, steroids or immunosuppressive agents) except vitiligo or resolved childhood asthma/atopy, or evidence of clinically significant immunosuppression.
- Subjects must not have active herpetic skin lesions or prior complications of herpetic infection and must not require intermittent or chronic treatment with an antiherpetic drug (eg, acyclovir), other than intermittent topical use.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Talimogene LaherparepvecAlso: IMLYGIC®, OncoVEX^GM-CSF, T-VECTalimogene laherparepvec administered by intratumoral injection | Drug | Phase 1b: Talimogene Laherparepvec + Pembrolizumab, Phase 3: Talimogene Laherparepvec + Pembrolizumab |
| PembrolizumabAlso: MK-3475, Keytruda®Administered at a dose of 200 mg as an intravenous infusion over approximately 30 minutes. | Drug | Phase 1b: Talimogene Laherparepvec + Pembrolizumab, Phase 3 : Placebo + Pembrolizumab, Phase 3: Talimogene Laherparepvec + Pembrolizumab |
| PlaceboAdministered by intratumoral injection | Drug | Phase 3 : Placebo + Pembrolizumab |
Primary outcome
Phase 1b: Number of Participants With Dose-limiting Toxicities (DLTs)
Time frame: The DLT evaluation period was 6 weeks from the initial administration of pembrolizumab (week 6 to 12).
A DLT was defined as any toxicity related to study drug which met any of the following criteria based on Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0: * Grade 4 non-hematologic toxicity. * Grade 3 or higher pneumonitis. * Grade 3 non-hematologic toxicity lasting > 3 days despite optimal supportive care, excluding grade 3 fatigue. * Any grade 3 or higher non-hematologic laboratory value if medical intervention was required, or the abnormality lead to hospitalization, or the abnormality persisted for > 1 week. * Febrile neutropenia grade 3 or grade 4. * Thrombocytopenia < 25 x 10^9/L if associated with a bleeding event which does not result in hemodynamic instability but required an elective platelet infusion, or a life-threatening bleeding event which resulted in urgent intervention and admission to intensive care unit. * Grade 5 toxicity (ie, death). * Any other intolerable toxicity leading to permanent discontinuation of talimogene laherparepvec or pembrolizumab.
Phase 3: Progression Free Survival (PFS) by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) Assessed Using Modified RECIST 1.1
Time frame: From randomization until the data-cut-off date of 02 March 2020; median (range) time on follow-up was 25.5 (0.6, 44.7) months in the Placebo + Pembrolizumab arm and 25.6 (0.3, 45.8) months in the Talimogene Laherparepvec + Pembrolizumab arm.
PFS per modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 is defined as the interval from randomization to the earlier event of progressive disease (PD) per modified RECIST 1.1 or death from any cause. PD: Increase in size of target lesions from nadir by ≥ 20% and ≥ 5 mm absolute increase above nadir, or the appearance of a new lesion. Median PFS was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Participants without an event were censored at their last evaluable tumor assessment if available; otherwise on their randomization date. The primary analysis of PFS was specified to be conducted when 407 PFS events had occurred (data cut-off date 02 March 2020).
Phase 3: Overall Survival
Time frame: From randomization until the end of study; median (range) time on follow-up was 34.8 (0.6, 58.3) months in the Placebo + Pembrolizumab arm and 36.8 (0.3, 58.4) months in the Talimogene Laherparepvec + Pembrolizumab arm.
Overall survival (OS) is defined as the interval from randomization to death from any cause. Median overall survival was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Participants without an event were censored at their last known alive date.
22 secondary outcomes
Phase 1b: Objective Response Rate (ORR)
Time frame: Tumor assessments were performed at week 6 (prior to initiation of pembrolizumab), week 18, and every 12 weeks thereafter until confirmed PD or start of new anticancer treatment; median (range) time on follow-up was 58.6 (1.4, 61.6) months.
Phase 1b: Best Overall Response (BOR)
Time frame: Tumor assessments were performed at week 6 (prior to initiation of pembrolizumab), week 18, and every 12 weeks thereafter until confirmed PD or start of new anticancer treatment; median (range) time on follow-up was 58.6 (1.4, 61.6) months.
Phase 1b: Durable Response Rate (DRR)
Time frame: Tumor assessments were performed at week 6 (prior to initiation of pembrolizumab), week 18, and every 12 weeks thereafter until confirmed PD or start of new anticancer treatment; median (range) time on follow-up was 58.6 (1.4, 61.6) months.
Phase 1b: Duration of Response (DOR)
Time frame: Tumor assessments were performed at week 6 (prior to initiation of pembrolizumab), week 18, and every 12 weeks thereafter until confirmed PD or start of new anticancer treatment; median (range) time on follow-up was 58.6 (1.4, 61.6) months.
Phase 1b: Disease Control Rate (DCR)
Time frame: Tumor assessments were performed at week 6 (prior to initiation of pembrolizumab), week 18, and every 12 weeks thereafter until confirmed PD or start of new anticancer treatment; median (range) time on follow-up was 58.6 (1.4, 61.6) months.
Phase 1b: Progression-free Survival (PFS)
Time frame: From first dose until the end of study; median (range) time on follow-up was 70.6 (1.4, 74.5) months.
Phase 1b: Overall Survival (OS)
Time frame: From first dose until the end of study; median (range) time on follow-up was 70.6 (1.4, 74.5) months.
Phase 3: Complete Response Rate Assessed Using Modified irRC-RECIST (iCRR)
Time frame: Tumor assessments were performed every 12 weeks after initiation of treatment until confirmed PD or start of new anticancer treatment; median (range) time on follow-up was 30.6 (0.6, 53.0) months and 31.4 (0.3, 52.5) months in each group, respectively.
Phase 3: Progression Free Survival Assessed Using Modified irRC-RECIST (iPFS)
Time frame: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 29 September 2020; median time on follow-up was 30.6 (0.6, 53.0) months in the Placebo + Pembrolizumab arm and 31.4 (0.3, 52.5) months in the Talimogene Laherparepvec + Pembrolizumab arm.
Phase 3: Overall Survival Excluding Stage IVM1c Participants
Time frame: From randomization until the end of study; median (range) time on follow-up was 34.8 (0.6, 58.3) months in the Placebo + Pembrolizumab arm and 36.8 (0.3, 58.4) months in the Talimogene Laherparepvec + Pembrolizumab arm.
Phase 3: Objective Response Rate Assessed Using Modified RECIST 1.1
Time frame: Tumor assessments were performed every 12 weeks after initiation of treatment until confirmed PD or start of new anticancer treatment; median (range) time on follow-up was 30.6 (0.6, 53.0) months and 31.4 (0.3, 52.5) months in each group, respectively.
Phase 3: Best Overall Response Assessed Using Modified RECIST 1.1
Time frame: Tumor assessments were performed every 12 weeks after initiation of treatment until confirmed PD or start of new anticancer treatment; median (range) time on follow-up was 30.6 (0.6, 53.0) months and 31.4 (0.3, 52.5) months in each group, respectively.
Phase 3: Durable Response Rate (DRR) Assessed Using Modified RECIST 1.1
Time frame: Tumor assessments were performed every 12 weeks after initiation of treatment until confirmed PD or start of new anticancer treatment; median (range) time on follow-up was 30.6 (0.6, 53.0) months and 31.4 (0.3, 52.5) months in each group, respectively.
Phase 3: Duration of Response (DOR) Assessed Using Modified RECIST 1.1
Time frame: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 29 September 2020; median time on follow-up was 30.6 (0.6, 53.0) months in the Placebo + Pembrolizumab arm and 31.4 (0.3, 52.5) months in the Talimogene Laherparepvec + Pembrolizumab arm.
Phase 3: Disease Control Rate (DCR) Assessed Using RECIST 1.1
Time frame: Tumor assessments were performed every 12 weeks after initiation of treatment until confirmed PD or start of new anticancer treatment; median (range) time on follow-up was 30.6 (0.6, 53.0) months and 31.4 (0.3, 52.5) months in each group, respectively.
Phase 3: Objective Response Rate Assessed Using Modified irRC-RECIST (iORR)
Time frame: Tumor assessments were performed every 12 weeks after initiation of treatment until confirmed PD or start of new anticancer treatment; median (range) time on follow-up was 30.6 (0.6, 53.0) months and 31.4 (0.3, 52.5) months in each group, respectively.
Phase 3: Best Overall Response Assessed Using Modified irRC-RECIST
Time frame: Tumor assessments were performed every 12 weeks after initiation of treatment until confirmed PD or start of new anticancer treatment; median (range) time on follow-up was 30.6 (0.6, 53.0) months and 31.4 (0.3, 52.5) months in each group, respectively.
Phase 3: Durable Response Rate Assessed Using Modified irRC-RECIST (iDRR)
Time frame: Tumor assessments were performed every 12 weeks after initiation of treatment until confirmed PD or start of new anticancer treatment; median (range) time on follow-up was 30.6 (0.6, 53.0) months and 31.4 (0.3, 52.5) months in each group, respectively.
Phase 3: Duration of Response Assessed Using Modified irRC-RECIST (iDOR)
Time frame: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 29 September 2020; median time on follow-up was 30.6 (0.6, 53.0) months in the Placebo + Pembrolizumab arm and 31.4 (0.3, 52.5) months in the Talimogene Laherparepvec + Pembrolizumab arm.
Phase 3: Disease Control Rate Assessed Using Modified irRC-RECIST (iDCR)
Time frame: Tumor assessments were performed every 12 weeks after initiation of treatment until confirmed PD or start of new anticancer treatment; median (range) time on follow-up was 30.6 (0.6, 53.0) months and 31.4 (0.3, 52.5) months in each group, respectively.
Phase 3: Change From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Module (EORTC QLQ-C30) Global Health Status (GHS)/Quality of Life (QOL) Score
Time frame: Baseline and day 1 of weeks 3, 6, 9, 12, then every 6 weeks until end of study treatment; median (range) duration of treatment was 39.0 (0.1, 107.3) weeks in Placebo + Pembrolizumab and 54.1 (0.1, 109.6) weeks in Talimogene Laherparepvec + Pembrolizumab.
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Time frame: From first dose to 30 days after last dose (90 days for SAEs); median (range) duration was 48 (5.1, 110.1) weeks in Phase 1b, 39 (0.1, 107.3) weeks in Placebo + Pembrolizumab and 56 (0.1, 109.6) weeks in Phase 3 Talimogene Laherparepvec + Pembrolizumab.
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 14 Nov 2022.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 28886381Ribas A, Dummer R, Puzanov I, VanderWalde A, Andtbacka RHI, Michielin O, Olszanski AJ, Malvehy J, Cebon J, Fernandez E, Kirkwood JM, Gajewski TF, Chen L, Gorski KS, Anderson AA, Diede SJ, Lassman ME, Gansert J, Hodi FS, Long GV. Oncolytic Virotherapy Promotes Intratumoral T Cell Infiltration and Improves Anti-PD-1 Immunotherapy. Cell. 2017 Sep 7;170(6):1109-1119.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.08.027.
- Background: PubMed 28238174Dummer R, Hoeller C, Gruter IP, Michielin O. Combining talimogene laherparepvec with immunotherapies in melanoma and other solid tumors. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2017 Jun;66(6):683-695. doi: 10.1007/s00262-017-1967-1. Epub 2017 Feb 25.
- Background: PubMed 35998300Chesney JA, Ribas A, Long GV, Kirkwood JM, Dummer R, Puzanov I, Hoeller C, Gajewski TF, Gutzmer R, Rutkowski P, Demidov L, Arenberger P, Shin SJ, Ferrucci PF, Haydon A, Hyngstrom J, van Thienen JV, Haferkamp S, Guilera JM, Rapoport BL, VanderWalde A, Diede SJ, Anderson JR, Treichel S, Chan EL, Bhatta S, Gansert J, Hodi FS, Gogas H. Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Global Phase III Trial of Talimogene Laherparepvec Combined With Pembrolizumab for Advanced Melanoma. J Clin Oncol. 2023 Jan 20;41(3):528-540. doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.00343. Epub 2022 Aug 23.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 29896663Watanabe D, Goshima F. Oncolytic Virotherapy by HSV. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2018;1045:63-84. doi: 10.1007/978-981-10-7230-7_4.
- AmgenTrials clinical trials websiteLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. De-identified individual patient data for variables necessary to address the specific research question in an approved data sharing request
Related trials for Melanoma
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1
IL-17 Blockade to Decrease irAEs (REPLAY)
Metastatic Melanoma
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Natural History Study of Early Life Exposures in Agriculture (ELEA)
Prostate Cancer, Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 1
A Feasibility Study Utilizing Immune Recall to Increase Response to Checkpoint Therapy
Melanoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
A Study of Dapansutrile Plus Pembrolizumab in Patients With PD-1 Refractory Advanced Melanoma
Melanoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
MD study director
Amgen
161 sites in 21 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Talimogene Laherparepvec and Pembrolizumab in people with Melanoma, run by Amgen at 161 sites in 21 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Nov 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 161 sites in United States, Germany, Australia, France, Poland and 16 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 16 May 2022). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Phase 1b: Number of Participants With Dose-limiting Toxicities (DLTs) (time frame: The DLT evaluation period was 6 weeks from the initial administration of pembrolizumab (week 6 to 12).). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02263508, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Nov 2022.