AzTrials
AzTrials

Mental Health Wellness 1WENCT02263742

Project Wellness Enhancement: Increasing Health Care Choice and Outcomes for People With Mental Illness

A study testing Peer whole health intervention and EBPs at Wellness Center in people with Mental Health Wellness 1 and Mental Illnesses, run by Yale University at 2 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This project aims to study health outcomes of individuals with mental illness attending a co-located primary health care center in a mental health center. This study uses mixed methods to collect a range of information about who chooses to use what Wellness Center services and in what combinations, with what short and… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
What is being tested?
Peer whole health intervention and EBPs at Wellness Center
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
204 participants
Where
2 sitesUnited States
Study dates
Apr 2014to Sep 2016
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • 18 years or older
  • Clients receiving services from CMHC and the Wellness Center.
  • Research staff will verify with CMHC staff that the potential participant is receiving services currently at CMHC.
  • Provider research subjects will be included if they are a mental health provider at CMHC or if they are members of the staff for the Wellness Center
  • Adults with serious mental illness and physical illness

Who cannot join

  • Participant research subjects not receiving services at CMHC and the Wellness Center
  • Provider research subjects of other agencies will be excluded
  • Children and youth under 18 years of age

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

United States2 sites
  • CT Mental Health Center

    New Haven, Connecticut, 06511

  • Yale University Program for Recovery and Community Health

    New Haven, Connecticut, 06513

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Increasing Health Care Choices and Improving Health Outcomes Among Persons With Serious Mental Illness

This project aims to study health outcomes of individuals with mental illness attending a co-located primary health care center in a mental health center. This study uses mixed methods to collect a range of information about who chooses to use what Wellness Center services and in what combinations, with what short and longer-term effects and with what outcomes.

Based on participant interviews, identify barriers to and facilitators of access, service, and improvements in person-centered outcomes and elicit suggestions for enhancing health care outcomes and choice.

Collaborate with persons in recovery in using the data collected through Aims 1 and 2 to develop and pilot the effectiveness of a new peer-led community based intervention in enhancing access and choice and improving person-centered health outcomes.

Read the detailed description

Background: Americans with serious mental illnesses (SMI) die an average of 25 years earlier due to modifiable risk factors, medical conditions, and lack of access to quality, coordinated care. Strategies for addressing this disparity have amassed evidence. What remains to be determined is who will choose to use these evidence-based practices (EBPs) when implemented in routine practice, in what combinations, with what short term effects and health outcomes, and what else might be needed for persons for whom these strategies are not effective.

Objectives: The proposed research builds upon the investigators receipt of a SAMHSA grant that established an integrated Wellness Center (WC) within the local mental health center that provides four EBPs: a) on-site primary care; b) screening of clients for modifiable risk factors and medical conditions; c) care coordination; and d) peer health navigation. Through PCORI, the investigators propose to add a comparative effectiveness dimension and a focus on patient-centered outcomes. The investigators specific aims are:

  1. to assess patient preferences and use of services, short-term effects, and longer term outcomes associated with various practices for the population and subpopulations;
  2. to identify barriers to and facilitators of access, service use, and improvements in traditional and patient-centered health outcomes; and
  3. to develop and pilot a peer-led, community-based intervention in enhancing access and choice, and improving patient-centered health outcomes, among 40 treatment-refractory clients of the WC.

The investigators long-term objectives are to: a) identify which practices work for which persons with SMI in improving health and patient-centered outcomes, and b) provide stakeholders around the nation with the knowledge and tools to replicate this model efficiently, effectively, and broadly.

Methods: The sample includes 360 poor, urban adults with SMI who are at risk for or have co-morbid medical conditions. Using participatory and mixed methodology, the investigators will assess Specific Aims 1 \& 2 by collecting health and patient-centered outcome data on patients entering the WC and at 6 month follow-up intervals and analyze the data using Linear Mixed Models and logistic regression. Outcome data from the pilot intervention (Aim 3; N=40) will be compared to outcomes of a propensity matched sample of WC patients. Qualitative data will be collected each year through focus groups (N=48 agency stakeholders, year 1) and individual interviews (50 WC patients, years 2 \& 3).

Projected Patient Outcomes: Outcomes include both traditional medical/clinical outcomes (e.g., blood pressure, BMI, fasting plasma glucose, HbGA1c, cholesterol, triglycerides, alcohol and drug use, psychiatric symptoms) and a range of patient-centered outcomes to be identified by key stakeholders in the initial phase of research. The investigators previous research suggests that these outcomes are likely to include self-efficacy, quality of life, employment, citizenship, and social connectedness.

Being tested
Peer whole health intervention, EBPs at Wellness Center
Keywords
Healthcare choice and outcomes, Peer-led whole health, Mental Illness, Peer Health Navigation, Health care Coordination
Medical subject headings
Mental Disorders

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Peer whole health interventionBehavioural

    Provide wraparound peer support, education, and navigation to individuals

  • EBPs at Wellness CenterBehavioural

    four EBPs: a) on-site primary care; b) screening of clients for modifiable risk factors and medical conditions; c) care coordination; and d) peer health navigation

Study groups in NCT02263742
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Peer whole healthExperimentalPeer whole health intervention will be compared to the treatment as usual at Wellness Center to assess healthcare choice and outcomes
Receives: Behavioral: Peer whole health intervention
EBPs at Wellness CenterActive comparatorEBPs at Wellness Center will be the active comparative to measure healthcare choice and outcomes with the peer whole health intervention
Receives: Behavioral: EBPs at Wellness Center

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Effectiveness of a Co-located Primary Health Care Center in a Local mental health center

    Use mixed methods to collect a rage of information about who chooses to use Using quantitative and qualitative measures by looking at the number of participants, follow up rates, improvement in health indices

    Measured: up to 30 months

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Effectiveness of health care navigation in improving health outcomes for people with mental illness

    Use mixed methods to collect a rage of information about who chooses to use Using quantitative and qualitative measures by looking at the number of participants, follow up rates, improvement in health indices, including some patient centered measures, and also the number of times they meet with their health care navigators

    Measured: up to 30 months

  2. Universal Health screening

    Look at whether clients of the Wellness Center have improvement in their overall health by looking at their health measurements and lab works from each of their 6 month appointments

    Measured: up to 30 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted13 Oct 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study startApr 2014
  3. Primary completionSep 2016
  4. Study completionSep 2016

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
204 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02263742
Sponsor's protocol ID
1310012851
Acronym
WE
Status last verified
Jan 2018
First submitted
31 Mar 2014
Last updated
17 Jan 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Peer whole health intervention and EBPs at Wellness Center in people with Mental Health Wellness 1 and Mental Illnesses, run by Yale University at 2 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Jan 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Effectiveness of a Co-located Primary Health Care Center in a Local mental health center (time frame: up to 30 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Jan 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in