Renal Cell CarcinomaPhase 1NCT02264548
A Phase I Evaluating Integration of HypofractionatedStudy Renal Ablative Radiotherapy
A Phase 1 study testing Radio-Ablation in people with Renal Cell Carcinoma, run by London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
evaluate the safety and toxicity profile of renal radio-ablation in the setting of metastatic renal cell carcinoma. to assess renal function post radio-ablation Primary and metastatic tumour response to radio-ablation Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Renal Cell Carcinoma
- What is being tested?
- Radio-Ablation
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 14 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- Jul 2009to 4 Aug 2020
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Eligibility Criteria
- Patients must have histologically confirmed carcinoma of the kidney
- Patients must be able to tolerate extended treatment time 30 minutes for MVCT and treatment delivery) for radiation on the tomotherapy unit
- Patients must have confirmed metastatic disease, nodal or locally advanced disease either by biopsy or imaging
- Informed consent performed and documented
- Patients must have one of a) unresectable local disease, b) be medically inoperable, or c) chosen against having a local surgical treatment
- Age ≥ 18
- Patients previously received any targeted therapy or immunotherapy for RCC, are also eligible. Patients must be off these agents for a minimum of 2 weeks prior to radiation therapy to be eligible
Who cannot join
- Patients without an adequate functioning contralateral kidney as seen on renal perfusion scan (>40% of total renal flow)
- Patients with poor baseline renal function, represented by a creatinine clearance < 50 mL/minute based on the Cockcroft-Gault approximation method
- Patients with a creatinine clearance < 50 ml/minute are still eligible if the ipsilateral kidney has <25% of the total renal flow on a renal perfusion scan.
- еCCr =140 - (Age) × Mass (in kilograms) × constant Serum creatinine ( in µmol/L) constant = male is 1.23, women is 1.04)
- Previous abdominal radiotherapy
- Bilateral RCC
Show all 14Show fewer
- Diagnosis of transitional cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, or a non epithelial cancer of the kidney
- Diagnosis of any other malignancy in previous 5 years, excluding non-melanoma skin cancer -Known active malignancy other than RCC, excluding non-melanoma skin cancer
- Estimated (by treating radiation oncologist) life expectancy of less than 8 weeks
- Pregnant or breast-feeding women
- Concurrent illness in addition to RCC that would make radiotherapy delivery unduly challenging, including but not limited to, severe congestive heart failure or other cardiorespiratory conditions, severe neuromuscular disorders, ongoing or active infections, and psychiatric illness
- Medical conditions for which radiation is contraindicated, including but not limited to, scleroderma, systemic lupus erythematosus and ataxia teleangiectasia - Patients with excessive kidney motion on pre-planning 4D-CT scan that would prevent safe delivery of radiotherapy with gated or non-gated techniques
- Patients taking concurrent medication that can interfere with the safe delivery of radiation (e.g. radiosensitizers)
- Urology opinion recommends partial nephrectomy as cytoreductive atment --Expected TKI therapy to be initiated during initial 2 weeks completion of radiotherapy.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Canada1 site
London Regional Cancer Program of the Laswon Research Health Institue
London, Ontario, N6A 4L6
About this study
Official title: A Phase I Study Evaluating the Integration of Hypofractionated Renal Ablative Radiotherapy in the Setting of Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma
- evaluate the safety and toxicity profile of renal radio-ablation in the setting of metastatic renal cell carcinoma.
- to assess renal function post radio-ablation
- Primary and metastatic tumour response to radio-ablation
Read the detailed description
A dose limiting toxicity (DLT) will be defined as any grade 3, 4 or 5 toxicity event that is considered to be definitely, probably or possibility related to the protocol radiation therapy. Patients that cannot complete protocol therapy due to acute radiation side-effects will also be considered to be a DLT. The general (non-exhausive) list of organ based toxicity that could be related to this type of radiation therapy include toxicity to the liver, kidney, bowel, spinal cord, and pancreas. Side-effects that are exclusively due to TKI targeted therapy are not considered to be DLT in this protocol.
Three patients will be recruited for the first cohort of the trial. These patients will have the PTV prescribed a dose of 25 Gray to be given in 5 daily fractions over a period of one week (first treatment to start on a Wednesday or Thursday, with planned treatment on successive business days). All therapy should be delivered within 10 business days including any treatment breaks for acute toxicity. After 3 patients have been seen at the 4 week follow up visit, CTCAE version three will be noted. If precisely 1 patient has a DLT, then an additional 3 patients will be recruited to the same cohort and given the same treatment. If no patient has DLT, then a new cohort of 3 patients will be treated to an increased dose of 30 Gray in 5 fractions. Similar criteria will dictate whether the trial ends, or continues with the next cohort being treated to a dose of 35 Gray in 5 daily fractions. There will be a maximum of 4 cohorts (25Gy, 30Gy, 35Gy, and 40Gy) in this study assuming no early DLT issues, each containing 3 or 6 patients. Allowance for a -1 cohort arm of 20 Gy in 5 fractions is made in this protocol for early DLT issues. The diagram below displays the schema in more detail.
Any patient that does not complete protocol therapy due to toxicity issues or is unavailable for the 4-week toxicity assessment is considered to be non-evaluable. These patients will need to be replaced in terms of study accrual. Patients are not to be given TKI therapy during the 4 week window post-RT in order to allow for proper evaluation of the RT intervention; however, the treating oncologist ultimately can override this if it is in the best medical interest of the patient (e.g. progressive and symptomatic systemic disease)
- Conditions
- Renal Cell Carcinoma
- Being tested
- Radio-Ablation
- Medical subject headings
- Carcinoma, Renal Cell
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Radio-AblationRadiation
Level I 20Gy/5 Level II 25Gy/5 Level III 30Gy/5 Level IV 35Gy/5 Level V 40Gy/5
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Arm 1 | Experimental | Radiation: Radio-Ablation Receives: Radiation: Radio-Ablation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
evaluate the safety/toxicity profile of renal radio-ablation in the setting of metastatic RCC
toxicity will be assessed using CTCAE v3
Measured: After 3 patients have been seen at the 4 week follow up visit,
Secondary outcomes (1)
Renal Function post renal radio-ablation
BUN, Creatinine
Measured: 4,8,12 wk and every 6months x 5yr
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Oct 2014 (estimated)
- Study startJul 2009
- Primary completion4 Aug 2020
- Study completion4 Aug 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Renal Cell CarcinomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 14 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Belal Ahmad, London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's
- Investigators
- Belal Ahmad, MD FRCPC, Principal investigator, London Regional Cancer Program of the Lawson Health Research Institute
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02264548
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Renal Ablation
- Status last verified
- Mar 2023
- First submitted
- 22 Jul 2014
- Last updated
- 9 Mar 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Correa RJM, Ahmad B, Warner A, Johnson C, MacKenzie MJ, Pautler SE, Bauman GS, Rodrigues GB, Louie AV. A prospective phase I dose-escalation trial of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) as an alternative to cytoreductive nephrectomy for inoperable patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Radiat Oncol. 2018 Mar 20;13(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s13014-018-0992-3.
PubMed 29558966Correa RJM, Rodrigues GB, Chen H, Warner A, Ahmad B, Louie AV. Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy (SABR) for Large Renal Tumors: A Retrospective Case Series Evaluating Clinical Outcomes, Toxicity, and Technical Considerations. Am J Clin Oncol. 2018 Jun;41(6):568-575. doi: 10.1097/COC.0000000000000329.
PubMed 27635623
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Mar 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase I Study Evaluating the Integration of Hypofractionated Renal Ablative Radiotherapy in the Setting of Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02264548
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Renal Ablation
- Conditions
- Renal Cell Carcinoma
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 14 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph'sUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jul 2009
- Primary completion
- 4 Aug 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 4 Aug 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 15 Oct 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
- evaluate the safety and toxicity profile of renal radio-ablation in the setting of metastatic renal cell carcinoma.
- to assess renal function post radio-ablation
- Primary and metastatic tumour response to radio-ablation
Detailed description
A dose limiting toxicity (DLT) will be defined as any grade 3, 4 or 5 toxicity event that is considered to be definitely, probably or possibility related to the protocol radiation therapy. Patients that cannot complete protocol therapy due to acute radiation side-effects will also be considered to be a DLT. The general (non-exhausive) list of organ based toxicity that could be related to this type of radiation therapy include toxicity to the liver, kidney, bowel, spinal cord, and pancreas. Side-effects that are exclusively due to TKI targeted therapy are not considered to be DLT in this protocol.
Three patients will be recruited for the first cohort of the trial. These patients will have the PTV prescribed a dose of 25 Gray to be given in 5 daily fractions over a period of one week (first treatment to start on a Wednesday or Thursday, with planned treatment on successive business days). All therapy should be delivered within 10 business days including any treatment breaks for acute toxicity. After 3 patients have been seen at the 4 week follow up visit, CTCAE version three will be noted. If precisely 1 patient has a DLT, then an additional 3 patients will be recruited to the same cohort and given the same treatment. If no patient has DLT, then a new cohort of 3 patients will be treated to an increased dose of 30 Gray in 5 fractions. Similar criteria will dictate whether the trial ends, or continues with the next cohort being treated to a dose of 35 Gray in 5 daily fractions. There will be a maximum of 4 cohorts (25Gy, 30Gy, 35Gy, and 40Gy) in this study assuming no early DLT issues, each containing 3 or 6 patients. Allowance for a -1 cohort arm of 20 Gy in 5 fractions is made in this protocol for early DLT issues. The diagram below displays the schema in more detail.
Any patient that does not complete protocol therapy due to toxicity issues or is unavailable for the 4-week toxicity assessment is considered to be non-evaluable. These patients will need to be replaced in terms of study accrual. Patients are not to be given TKI therapy during the 4 week window post-RT in order to allow for proper evaluation of the RT intervention; however, the treating oncologist ultimately can override this if it is in the best medical interest of the patient (e.g. progressive and symptomatic systemic disease)
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Arm 1 | Experimental | Radiation: Radio-AblationRadiation: Radio-Ablation |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Eligibility Criteria
- Patients must have histologically confirmed carcinoma of the kidney
- Patients must be able to tolerate extended treatment time 30 minutes for MVCT and treatment delivery) for radiation on the tomotherapy unit
- Patients must have confirmed metastatic disease, nodal or locally advanced disease either by biopsy or imaging
- Informed consent performed and documented
Key exclusion criteria (14 listed)
- Patients without an adequate functioning contralateral kidney as seen on renal perfusion scan (>40% of total renal flow)
- Patients with poor baseline renal function, represented by a creatinine clearance < 50 mL/minute based on the Cockcroft-Gault approximation method
- Patients with a creatinine clearance < 50 ml/minute are still eligible if the ipsilateral kidney has <25% of the total renal flow on a renal perfusion scan.
- еCCr =140 - (Age) × Mass (in kilograms) × constant Serum creatinine ( in µmol/L) constant = male is 1.23, women is 1.04)
- Previous abdominal radiotherapy
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Radio-AblationLevel I 20Gy/5 Level II 25Gy/5 Level III 30Gy/5 Level IV 35Gy/5 Level V 40Gy/5 | Radiation | Arm 1 |
Primary outcome
evaluate the safety/toxicity profile of renal radio-ablation in the setting of metastatic RCC
Time frame: After 3 patients have been seen at the 4 week follow up visit,
toxicity will be assessed using CTCAE v3
1 secondary outcome
Renal Function post renal radio-ablation
Time frame: 4,8,12 wk and every 6months x 5yr
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Mar 2023.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 29558966Correa RJM, Ahmad B, Warner A, Johnson C, MacKenzie MJ, Pautler SE, Bauman GS, Rodrigues GB, Louie AV. A prospective phase I dose-escalation trial of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) as an alternative to cytoreductive nephrectomy for inoperable patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Radiat Oncol. 2018 Mar 20;13(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s13014-018-0992-3.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 27635623Correa RJM, Rodrigues GB, Chen H, Warner A, Ahmad B, Louie AV. Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy (SABR) for Large Renal Tumors: A Retrospective Case Series Evaluating Clinical Outcomes, Toxicity, and Technical Considerations. Am J Clin Oncol. 2018 Jun;41(6):568-575. doi: 10.1097/COC.0000000000000329.
Related trials for Renal Cell Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 3
Study of Casdatifan and Cabozantinib Versus Placebo and Cabozantinib in Patients With Advanced Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma
Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma, Advanced Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma
RecruitingObservational study
Hereditary Leiomyomatosis Renal Cell Cancer - Study of the Genetic Cause and the Predisposition to Renal Cancer
Renal Tumor Histology, Cutaneous Leiomyoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
Pazopanib Hydrochloride in Treating Patients With Metastatic Kidney Cancer Who Have No Evidence of Disease After Surgery
Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma, Stage IV Renal Cell Cancer AJCC v7
Enrolling by invitation
Use of Tracking Devices to Locate Abnormalities During Invasive Procedures
Adenocarcinoma, Prostate Neoplasms
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Neoadjuvant Belzutifan Plus Pembrolizumab in High-Risk, Locally Advanced Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma
Locally Advanced Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Belal Ahmad, MD FRCPC principal investigator
London Regional Cancer Program of the Lawson Health Research Institute
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1 study testing Radio-Ablation in people with Renal Cell Carcinoma, run by London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 14 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Mar 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
evaluate the safety/toxicity profile of renal radio-ablation in the setting of metastatic RCC (time frame: After 3 patients have been seen at the 4 week follow up visit,). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02264548, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Mar 2023.