AzTrials
AzTrials

Homozygous Familial HypercholesterolemiaPhase 2NCT02265952

Study of REGN1500 in Participants With Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia (HoFH)

A Phase 2 study testing REGN1500 250 mg SC/15 mg/kg IV/450 mg SC in people with Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia, run by Regeneron Pharmaceuticals at 5 sites in 3 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is an open-label, single-arm study to assess the reduction of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) by REGN1500 in patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia
What is being tested?
REGN1500 250 mg SC/15 mg/kg IV/450 mg SC
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
9 participants
Where
5 sitesin 3 countries
Study dates
4 Feb 2015to 23 Jul 2018
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Men and women ≥18 years of age at the time of the screening visit
  • Diagnosis of homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH)
  • Willing to consistently maintain usual diet for the duration of the study

Who cannot join

  • Background medical lipid modifying therapy that has not been stable for at least 4 weeks (6 weeks for fibrates) prior to the screening visit
  • Having undergone lipid apheresis within 4 weeks prior to the screening visit
  • Use of another investigational drug or therapy within 30 days or at least 5 half-lives (whichever is longer) prior to the screening visit
  • Previous participation in any clinical trial of REGN1500
  • Note: The information listed above is not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a patient's potential participation in this clinical trial therefore not all inclusion/ exclusion criteria are listed.

Trial locations and contacts

5 sites in 3 countries.

5 sites in 3 countries

United States3 sites
  • Study site

    Dallas, Texas

  • Study site

    Los Angeles, California

  • Study site

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Other trials in United States

Canada1 site
  • Study site

    Chicoutimi, Quebec

Other trials in Canada

Netherlands1 site
  • Study site

    Amsterdam

Other trials in Netherlands

About this study

Official title: An Open-Label, Single-Arm, Proof-of-Concept Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Single and Multiple Doses of REGN1500 in Patients With Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia

This is an open-label, single-arm study to assess the reduction of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) by REGN1500 in patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH).

Being tested
REGN1500 250 mg SC/15 mg/kg IV/450 mg SC
Medical subject headings
Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • REGN1500 250 mg SC/15 mg/kg IV/450 mg SCDrug

    Participants received single dose of REGN1500 subcutaneous (SC) injection of 250 milligrams (mg) at Week 0 (Day 1), followed by single dose of REGN1500 intravenous (IV) injection of 15 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) at Week 2 (Day 15) and then followed by 4 doses of REGN1500 SC injection of 450 mg once weekly starting from Week 12 (Day 85). Only the first 2 enrolled participants received 4 weekly REGN1500 450 mg SC doses at weeks 12, 13, 14, and 15 per the protocol. This dose regimen was removed under protocol amendment 4. Participants were followed for a period of 24 weeks (through Week 26 [Day 183]) after the last dose of study drug in the main study period.

Study groups in NCT02265952
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Open-labelExperimentalOpen-label REGN1500
Receives: Drug: REGN1500 250 mg SC/15 mg/kg IV/450 mg SC

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percent Change in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) From Baseline (Week 0) to Week 4 in the Main Study Period

    Percent change was reported for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) from baseline (week 0) up to week 4. LDL-C was measured using conventional units mg/dL. The efficacy analysis set included all participants in the safety analysis set (SAF) who had baseline and at least 1 post-baseline measure of the lipid panel in the main study period.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0) up to Week 4

Secondary outcomes (21)
  1. Absolute Change in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) From Baseline (Week 0) to Week 4 in the Main Study Period

    Absolute change in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) from baseline (week 0) up to week 4 was reported. The efficacy analysis set included all participants in the SAF who had baseline and at least 1 post-baseline measure of the lipid panel in the main study period.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0) up to Week 4

  2. Absolute Change in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) From Week 2 to Week 4 in the Main Study Period

    Absolute change in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) from week 2 to week 4 was reported. The efficacy analysis set included all participants in the SAF who had baseline and at least 1 post-baseline measure of the lipid panel in the main study period.

    Measured: Week 2 to Week 4

  3. Percent Change in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) From Week 2 to Week 4 in the Main Study Period

    Percent change was reported in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) from week 2 to week 4. LDL-C was measured using conventional units mg/dL. The efficacy analysis set included all participants in the SAF who had baseline and at least 1 post-baseline measure of the lipid panel in the main study period.

    Measured: Week 2 to Week 4

  4. Absolute Change in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) From Baseline (Week 0) Over Time in the Main Study Period

    Absolute change was reported in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) from baseline (week 0) up to week 26. The efficacy analysis set included all participants in the safety analysis set (SAF) who had baseline and at least 1 post-baseline measure of the lipid panel in the main study period.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0) up to Week 26

  5. Percent Change in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) From Baseline (Week 0) Over Time in the Main Study Period

    Percent change was reported in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) from baseline (week 0) up to week 26. LDL-C was measured using conventional units mg/dL. The efficacy analysis set included all participants in the SAF who had baseline and at least 1 post-baseline measure of the lipid panel in the main study period.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0) up to Week 26

  6. Absolute Change in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) From Baseline (Week 26) to Week 214 in the Open Label Extension (OLE) Period

    Absolute change in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) from baseline (week 26) up to week 214 was reported. The efficacy analysis set included all participants in the SAF who had baseline and at least 1 post-baseline measure of the lipid panel in the main study period. (ET= Early Termination; EOS = End of Study)

    Measured: Baseline (Week 26) up to Week 214

  7. Percent Change in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) From Baseline (Week 26) to Week 214 in the Open Label Extension (OLE) Period

    Percent change was reported in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) from baseline (week 26) to week 214 in the OLE period. LDL-C was measured using conventional units mg/dL. The efficacy analysis set included all participants in the SAF who had at least 1 post-baseline measure of the lipid panel in the main study period. (ET= Early Termination; EOS = End of Study)

    Measured: Baseline (Week 26) up to Week 214

  8. Absolute Change in Apolipoprotein (Apo B), Non-High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C), Total Cholesterol (Total-C), and Lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a]) From Baseline (Week 0) up to Week 26 in the Main Study Period

    Absolute change was reported for Apo B, Non-HDL-C, Total-C, and Lp(a) from baseline (week 0) up to Week 26. The efficacy analysis set included all participants in the SAF who had baseline and at least 1 post-baseline measure of the lipid panel in the main study period.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0) up to Week 26

  9. Percent Change in Apolipoprotein (Apo B), Non-High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C), Total Cholesterol (Total-C), and Lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a]) From Baseline (Week 0) up to Week 26 in the Main Study Period

    Percent change was reported for Apo B, Non-HDL-C, Total-C, and Lp(a) from baseline (week 0) up to week 26. Apo B, Non-HDL-C, Total-C, and Lp(a) were measured using conventional units mg/dL. The efficacy analysis set included all participants in the SAF who had baseline and at least 1 post-baseline measure of the lipid panel in the main study period.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0) up to Week 26

  10. Absolute Change in Apolipoprotein (Apo B), Non-High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C), Total Cholesterol (Total-C), and Lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a]) From Baseline (Week 26) to Week 214 in the Open Label Extension (OLE) Period

    Absolute changein Apo B, Non-HDL-C, Total-C, and Lp(a) from baseline to week 214 in open label extension (OLE) period. The efficacy analysis set included all participants in the SAF who had baseline and at least one post-baseline measure of the lipid panel in the main study period. (ET = Early Termination; EOS = End of Study)

    Measured: Baseline (Week 26) up to Week 214

  11. Percent Change in Apolipoprotein (Apo B), Non-High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C), Total Cholesterol (Total-C), and Lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a]) From Baseline (Week 26) to Week 214 in the Open Label Extension (OLE) Period

    Percent change was reported in Apo B, Non-HDL-C, Total-C, and Lp(a) from baseline (week 26) up to week 214 in OLE Period. Apo B, Non-HDL-C, Total-C, and Lp(a) were measured using conventional units mg/dL. The efficacy analysis set included all participants in the SAF who had baseline and at least one post-baseline measure of the lipid panel in the main study period. (ET= Early Termination; EOS = End of Study)

    Measured: Baseline (Week 26) up to Week 214

  12. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Reduction in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) of ≥ 25% From Baseline (Week 0) in the Main Study Period

    Percentage of participants who achieved reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) of greater than or equal to (≥) 25 percent (%) from baseline in the main study period was reported. The efficacy analysis set included all participants in the SAF who had baseline and at least 1 post-baseline measure of the lipid panel in the main study period.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0) up to Week 26

  13. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Reduction in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) of ≥ 25% From Baseline (Week 26) in the Open Label Extension (OLE) Period

    Percentage of participants who achieved a reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) of ≥ 25% from baseline (week 26) to week 214 was reported. The efficacy analysis set included all participants in the SAF who had baseline and at least 1 post-baseline measure of the lipid panel in the main study period.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 26) to Week 214

  14. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Reduction in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) of ≥ 50% From Baseline (Week 0) in the Main Study Period

    Percentage of participants who achieved a reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) of ≥ 50% from baseline (week 0) to week 26 was reported. The efficacy analysis set included all participants in the SAF who had baseline and at least 1 post-baseline measure of the lipid panel in the main study period.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0) to Week 26

  15. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Reduction in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) of ≥ 50% From Baseline (Week 26) in the Open Label Extension (OLE) Period

    Percentage of participants who achieved reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) of ≥ 50% from baseline (week 26) in the OLE period was reported. The efficacy analysis set included all participants in the SAF who had baseline and at least 1 post-baseline measure of the lipid panel in the main study period.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 26) up to Week 214

  16. Absolute Change in High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C), Triglycerides (TG), and Apolipoprotein A-1 (Apo A-1) From Baseline (Week 0) Over Time in the Main Study Period

    Absolute change was reported in HDL-C, TG, and Apo A-1 from baseline (week 0) up to week 26. The efficacy analysis set included all participants in the SAF who had baseline and at least one post-baseline measure of the lipid panel in the main study period.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0) up to Week 26

  17. Percent Change in High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C), Triglycerides (TG), and Apolipoprotein A-1 (Apo A-1) From Baseline (Week 0) Over Time in the Main Study Period

    Percent change was reported in HDL-C, TG, and Apo A-1 from baseline (week 0) up to week 26. HDL-C, TG, and Apo A-1 were measured using conventional units mg/dL. The efficacy analysis set included all participants in the SAF who had baseline and at least 1 post-baseline measure of the lipid panel in the main study period.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0) up to Week 26

  18. Percent Change in High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C), Triglycerides (TG), and Apolipoprotein A-1 (Apo A-1) From Baseline (Week 26) to Week 214 in the Open Label Extension (OLE) Period

    Percent change was reported in HDL-C, TG and Apo A-1 from baseline (week 26) up to week 214. HDL-C, TG and Apo A-1 were measured using conventional units mg/dL. The efficacy analysis set included all participants in the SAF who had baseline and at least one post-baseline measure of the lipid panel in the main study period. (ET= Early Termination; EOS = End of Study)

    Measured: Baseline (Week 26) up to Week 214

  19. Absolute Change in High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C), Triglycerides (TG), and Apolipoprotein A-1 (Apo A-1) From Baseline (Week 26) to Week 214 in the Open Label Extension (OLE) Period

    Absolute change was reported in HDL-C, TG and Apo A-1 from baseline (week 26) up to week 214. The efficacy analysis set included all participants in the SAF who had baseline and at least one post-baseline measure of the lipid panel in the main study period. (ET= Early Termination; EOS = End of Study)

    Measured: Baseline (Week 26) up to Week 214

  20. Absolute Change in Apolipoprotein CIII (Apo CIII) From Baseline (Week 0) Over Time in the Main Study Period

    Absolute change was reported in Apo CIII from baseline (week 0) up to week 16. The efficacy analysis set included all participants in the SAF who had baseline and at least 1 post-baseline measure of the lipid panel in the main study period.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0) up to Week 16

  21. Percent Change in Apolipoprotein CIII (Apo CIII) From Baseline (Week 0) Over Time in the Main Study Period

    Percent change was reported in Apo CIII from baseline (week 0) up to week 16. Apo CIII was measured using conventional units mg/dL. The efficacy analysis set included all participants in the SAF who had baseline and at least one post-baseline measure of the lipid panel in the main study period.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0) to Week 16

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted16 Oct 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study start4 Feb 2015
  3. Primary completion21 Nov 2016
  4. Study completion23 Jul 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
9 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02265952
Sponsor's protocol ID
R1500-CL-1331
Other IDs
2016-000411-32, 2016
Status last verified
Dec 2019
First submitted
10 Oct 2014
Last updated
9 Dec 2019
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Gaudet D, Gipe DA, Pordy R, Ahmad Z, Cuchel M, Shah PK, Chyu KY, Sasiela WJ, Chan KC, Brisson D, Khoury E, Banerjee P, Gusarova V, Gromada J, Stahl N, Yancopoulos GD, Hovingh GK. ANGPTL3 Inhibition in Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia. N Engl J Med. 2017 Jul 20;377(3):296-297. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1705994. No abstract available.

    PubMed 28723334
  • Banerjee P, Chan KC, Tarabocchia M, Benito-Vicente A, Alves AC, Uribe KB, Bourbon M, Skiba PJ, Pordy R, Gipe DA, Gaudet D, Martin C. Functional Analysis of LDLR (Low-Density Lipoprotein Receptor) Variants in Patient Lymphocytes to Assess the Effect of Evinacumab in Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia Patients With a Spectrum of LDLR Activity. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2019 Nov;39(11):2248-2260. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.119.313051. Epub 2019 Oct 3.

    PubMed 31578082

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing REGN1500 250 mg SC/15 mg/kg IV/450 mg SC in people with Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia, run by Regeneron Pharmaceuticals at 5 sites in 3 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Dec 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 5 sites in United States, Canada, Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 9 Dec 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percent Change in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) From Baseline (Week 0) to Week 4 in the Main Study Period (time frame: Baseline (Week 0) up to Week 4). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02265952, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Dec 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in