MalocclusionNCT02267850
Effect of Intra-Oral Photobiomodulation on Orthodontic Treatment Time
A study testing Fixed Orthodontic Appliance Treatment, OrthoPulse™ and Non-Functional OrthoPulse™ in people with Malocclusion, run by Biolux Research Holdings, Inc. at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The aim of this study is to determine the effect of OrthoPulse™, an intra-oral LED (Light Emitting Diode) photobiomodulation device, on orthodontic treatment time. This is a double-blinded RCT with half the patients receiving treatment from a sham non-functional device, serving as controls, and the other half… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 12 to 40 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Malocclusion
- What is being tested?
- Fixed Orthodontic Appliance Treatment, OrthoPulse™ and Non-Functional OrthoPulse™
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 29 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- May 2013to May 2016
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 12 to 40 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult
Who may be able to join
- Presence of permanent dentition
- Eligible and scheduled for full mouth fixed orthodontic treatment.
- Class I or Class II malocclusion (no more than ½ cusp in Class II)
- Non-extraction in all quadrants
- Non-smoker, non-use of chewing tobacco
- Good oral hygiene
- No adjunct treatment such as extra or intraoral appliances
- Age 12-40
Who cannot join
- Pregnant females
- Patient is currently enrolled in another clinical study
- Non-steroidal Anti-Inflammatory drug (NSAID) use during study (Acetominophen acceptable)
- Periodontally involved teeth
- Use of bisphosphonates
- Unerupted erupted teeth
- Teeth blocked out of alignment and unable to engage initial arch wire
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Effect of Intra-Oral Photobiomodulation on Orthodontic Treatment Time: A Randomized Control Trial
The aim of this study is to determine the effect of OrthoPulse™, an intra-oral LED (Light Emitting Diode) photobiomodulation device, on orthodontic treatment time. This is a double-blinded RCT with half the patients receiving treatment from a sham non-functional device, serving as controls, and the other half receiving light therapy treatment from a functional OrthoPulse™. Orthodontic treatment time for the sham-control patients are compared to that of the OrthoPulse™ patients.
- Conditions
- Malocclusion
- Being tested
- Fixed Orthodontic Appliance Treatment, OrthoPulse™, Non-Functional OrthoPulse™
- Keywords
- Photobiomodulation, Orthodontic treatment, Malocclusion, OrthoPulse™
- Medical subject headings
- Malocclusion
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Fixed Orthodontic Appliance TreatmentOther
Patients are treated for full mouth fixed orthodontic appliance treatment by the qualified Principal Investigator (PI). Treatment and follow-up appointments per the traditional practices of the PI and dental office.
OrthoPulse™Device
Patients carry out daily OrthoPulse™ treatments at home.
Non-Functional OrthoPulse™Device
Patients carry out daily sham-OrthoPulse™ treatments at home. This is a non-functional device so patients do not receive photobiomodulation therapy.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| OrthoPulse™ | Experimental | Subjects assigned to this group receive fixed orthodontic appliance treatment in conjunction with receiving daily OrthoPulse™ treatments. Receives: Other: Fixed Orthodontic Appliance Treatment; Device: OrthoPulse™ |
| Sham-Control OrthoPulse™ | Sham comparator | Subjects assigned to this group receive fixed orthodontic appliance treatment in conjunction with carrying out daily non-functional OrthoPulse™ treatments (untreated control). Receives: Other: Fixed Orthodontic Appliance Treatment; Device: Non-Functional OrthoPulse™ |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Overall Orthodontic Treatment Time for OrthoPulse™ and Non-OrthoPulse™ Treated Patients.
The amount of time that spans between the start of a patient's orthodontic treatment to when the qualified investigator deems the case complete, in that malocclusion is completely resolved and an acceptable clinical outcome is achieved.
Measured: Participants will be followed for the duration of their orthodontic treatment, an expected average of 1-2 years, depending on the severity of the case.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Oct 2014 (estimated)
- Study startMay 2013
- Primary completionMay 2016
- Study completionMay 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (19)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for MalocclusionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 29 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Biolux Research Holdings, Inc.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Timothy Shaughnessy, DDS, Principal investigator, Shaughnessy Orthodontics
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02267850
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- TS2
- Status last verified
- Feb 2018
- First submitted
- 10 Oct 2014
- Last updated
- 21 Sep 2018
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Nimeri G, Kau CH, Corona R, Shelly J. The effect of photobiomodulation on root resorption during orthodontic treatment. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2014 Jan 15;6:1-8. doi: 10.2147/CCIDE.S49489. eCollection 2014.
PubMed 24470774Ekizer A, Uysal T, Guray E, Akkus D. Effect of LED-mediated-photobiomodulation therapy on orthodontic tooth movement and root resorption in rats. Lasers Med Sci. 2015 Feb;30(2):779-85. doi: 10.1007/s10103-013-1405-3. Epub 2013 Aug 29.
PubMed 23990217Ekizer A, Uysal T, Guray E, Yuksel Y. Light-emitting diode photobiomodulation: effect on bone formation in orthopedically expanded suture in rats--early bone changes. Lasers Med Sci. 2013 Sep;28(5):1263-70. doi: 10.1007/s10103-012-1214-0. Epub 2012 Nov 9.
PubMed 23139069El-Bialy T, Alhadlaq A, Felemban N, Yeung J, Ebrahim A, Hassan AH. The effect of light-emitting diode and laser on mandibular growth in rats. Angle Orthod. 2015 Mar;85(2):233-8. doi: 10.2319/030914-170.1. Epub 2014 Jul 14.
PubMed 25017014Uysal T, Ekizer A, Akcay H, Etoz O, Guray E. Resonance frequency analysis of orthodontic miniscrews subjected to light-emitting diode photobiomodulation therapy. Eur J Orthod. 2012 Feb;34(1):44-51. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjq166. Epub 2010 Dec 27.
PubMed 21187526Kau CH, Kantarci A, Shaughnessy T, Vachiramon A, Santiwong P, de la Fuente A, Skrenes D, Ma D, Brawn P. Photobiomodulation accelerates orthodontic alignment in the early phase of treatment. Prog Orthod. 2013 Sep 19;14:30. doi: 10.1186/2196-1042-14-30.
PubMed 24326198Dias FJ, Issa JP, Vicentini FT, Fonseca MJ, Leao JC, Siessere S, Regalo SC, Iyomasa MM. Effects of low-level laser therapy on the oxidative metabolism and matrix proteins in the rat masseter muscle. Photomed Laser Surg. 2011 Oct;29(10):677-84. doi: 10.1089/pho.2010.2879. Epub 2011 Jul 11.
PubMed 21745137Silveira PC, Silva LA, Fraga DB, Freitas TP, Streck EL, Pinho R. Evaluation of mitochondrial respiratory chain activity in muscle healing by low-level laser therapy. J Photochem Photobiol B. 2009 May 4;95(2):89-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2009.01.004. Epub 2009 Jan 21.
PubMed 19232497Cruz DR, Kohara EK, Ribeiro MS, Wetter NU. Effects of low-intensity laser therapy on the orthodontic movement velocity of human teeth: a preliminary study. Lasers Surg Med. 2004;35(2):117-20. doi: 10.1002/lsm.20076.
PubMed 15334614Esper MA, Nicolau RA, Arisawa EA. The effect of two phototherapy protocols on pain control in orthodontic procedure--a preliminary clinical study. Lasers Med Sci. 2011 Sep;26(5):657-63. doi: 10.1007/s10103-011-0938-6. Epub 2011 May 31.
PubMed 21626017Youssef M, Ashkar S, Hamade E, Gutknecht N, Lampert F, Mir M. The effect of low-level laser therapy during orthodontic movement: a preliminary study. Lasers Med Sci. 2008 Jan;23(1):27-33. doi: 10.1007/s10103-007-0449-7. Epub 2007 Mar 15.
PubMed 17361391Sousa MV, Scanavini MA, Sannomiya EK, Velasco LG, Angelieri F. Influence of low-level laser on the speed of orthodontic movement. Photomed Laser Surg. 2011 Mar;29(3):191-6. doi: 10.1089/pho.2009.2652. Epub 2011 Jan 23.
PubMed 21254890Heravi F, Moradi A, Ahrari F. The effect of low level laser therapy on the rate of tooth movement and pain perception during canine retraction. Oral Health Dent Manag. 2014 Jun;13(2):183-8.
PubMed 24984620Whelan HT, Smits RL Jr, Buchman EV, Whelan NT, Turner SG, Margolis DA, Cevenini V, Stinson H, Ignatius R, Martin T, Cwiklinski J, Philippi AF, Graf WR, Hodgson B, Gould L, Kane M, Chen G, Caviness J. Effect of NASA light-emitting diode irradiation on wound healing. J Clin Laser Med Surg. 2001 Dec;19(6):305-14. doi: 10.1089/104454701753342758.
PubMed 11776448Weber JB, Pinheiro AL, de Oliveira MG, Oliveira FA, Ramalho LM. Laser therapy improves healing of bone defects submitted to autologous bone graft. Photomed Laser Surg. 2006 Feb;24(1):38-44. doi: 10.1089/pho.2006.24.38.
PubMed 16503787
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 Sep 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effect of Intra-Oral Photobiomodulation on Orthodontic Treatment Time: A Randomized Control Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02267850
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- TS2
- Conditions
- Malocclusion
- Keywords
- Photobiomodulation, Orthodontic treatment, Malocclusion, OrthoPulse™
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 29 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Biolux Research Holdings, Inc.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- May 2013
- Primary completion
- May 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- May 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 20 Oct 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 27 Mar 2018
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of this study is to determine the effect of OrthoPulse™, an intra-oral LED (Light Emitting Diode) photobiomodulation device, on orthodontic treatment time. This is a double-blinded RCT with half the patients receiving treatment from a sham non-functional device, serving as controls, and the other half receiving light therapy treatment from a functional OrthoPulse™. Orthodontic treatment time for the sham-control patients are compared to that of the OrthoPulse™ patients.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| OrthoPulse™ | Experimental | Other: Fixed Orthodontic Appliance Treatment, Device: OrthoPulse™Subjects assigned to this group receive fixed orthodontic appliance treatment in conjunction with receiving daily OrthoPulse™ treatments. |
| Sham-Control OrthoPulse™ | Sham comparator | Other: Fixed Orthodontic Appliance Treatment, Device: Non-Functional OrthoPulse™Subjects assigned to this group receive fixed orthodontic appliance treatment in conjunction with carrying out daily non-functional OrthoPulse™ treatments (untreated control). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 12 to 40 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Presence of permanent dentition
- Eligible and scheduled for full mouth fixed orthodontic treatment.
- Class I or Class II malocclusion (no more than ½ cusp in Class II)
- Non-extraction in all quadrants
- Non-smoker, non-use of chewing tobacco
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Pregnant females
- Patient is currently enrolled in another clinical study
- Non-steroidal Anti-Inflammatory drug (NSAID) use during study (Acetominophen acceptable)
- Periodontally involved teeth
- Use of bisphosphonates
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Fixed Orthodontic Appliance TreatmentPatients are treated for full mouth fixed orthodontic appliance treatment by the qualified Principal Investigator (PI). Treatment and follow-up appointments per the traditional practices of the PI and dental office. | Other | OrthoPulse™, Sham-Control OrthoPulse™ |
| OrthoPulse™Patients carry out daily OrthoPulse™ treatments at home. | Device | OrthoPulse™ |
| Non-Functional OrthoPulse™Patients carry out daily sham-OrthoPulse™ treatments at home. This is a non-functional device so patients do not receive photobiomodulation therapy. | Device | Sham-Control OrthoPulse™ |
Primary outcome
Overall Orthodontic Treatment Time for OrthoPulse™ and Non-OrthoPulse™ Treated Patients.
Time frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of their orthodontic treatment, an expected average of 1-2 years, depending on the severity of the case.
The amount of time that spans between the start of a patient's orthodontic treatment to when the qualified investigator deems the case complete, in that malocclusion is completely resolved and an acceptable clinical outcome is achieved.
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 Sep 2018.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 24470774Nimeri G, Kau CH, Corona R, Shelly J. The effect of photobiomodulation on root resorption during orthodontic treatment. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2014 Jan 15;6:1-8. doi: 10.2147/CCIDE.S49489. eCollection 2014.
- Background: PubMed 23990217Ekizer A, Uysal T, Guray E, Akkus D. Effect of LED-mediated-photobiomodulation therapy on orthodontic tooth movement and root resorption in rats. Lasers Med Sci. 2015 Feb;30(2):779-85. doi: 10.1007/s10103-013-1405-3. Epub 2013 Aug 29.
- Background: PubMed 23139069Ekizer A, Uysal T, Guray E, Yuksel Y. Light-emitting diode photobiomodulation: effect on bone formation in orthopedically expanded suture in rats--early bone changes. Lasers Med Sci. 2013 Sep;28(5):1263-70. doi: 10.1007/s10103-012-1214-0. Epub 2012 Nov 9.
- Background: PubMed 25017014El-Bialy T, Alhadlaq A, Felemban N, Yeung J, Ebrahim A, Hassan AH. The effect of light-emitting diode and laser on mandibular growth in rats. Angle Orthod. 2015 Mar;85(2):233-8. doi: 10.2319/030914-170.1. Epub 2014 Jul 14.
- Background: PubMed 21187526Uysal T, Ekizer A, Akcay H, Etoz O, Guray E. Resonance frequency analysis of orthodontic miniscrews subjected to light-emitting diode photobiomodulation therapy. Eur J Orthod. 2012 Feb;34(1):44-51. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjq166. Epub 2010 Dec 27.
- Background: PubMed 24326198Kau CH, Kantarci A, Shaughnessy T, Vachiramon A, Santiwong P, de la Fuente A, Skrenes D, Ma D, Brawn P. Photobiomodulation accelerates orthodontic alignment in the early phase of treatment. Prog Orthod. 2013 Sep 19;14:30. doi: 10.1186/2196-1042-14-30.
- Background: PubMed 21745137Dias FJ, Issa JP, Vicentini FT, Fonseca MJ, Leao JC, Siessere S, Regalo SC, Iyomasa MM. Effects of low-level laser therapy on the oxidative metabolism and matrix proteins in the rat masseter muscle. Photomed Laser Surg. 2011 Oct;29(10):677-84. doi: 10.1089/pho.2010.2879. Epub 2011 Jul 11.
- Background: PubMed 19232497Silveira PC, Silva LA, Fraga DB, Freitas TP, Streck EL, Pinho R. Evaluation of mitochondrial respiratory chain activity in muscle healing by low-level laser therapy. J Photochem Photobiol B. 2009 May 4;95(2):89-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2009.01.004. Epub 2009 Jan 21.
- Background: PubMed 15334614Cruz DR, Kohara EK, Ribeiro MS, Wetter NU. Effects of low-intensity laser therapy on the orthodontic movement velocity of human teeth: a preliminary study. Lasers Surg Med. 2004;35(2):117-20. doi: 10.1002/lsm.20076.
- Background: PubMed 21626017Esper MA, Nicolau RA, Arisawa EA. The effect of two phototherapy protocols on pain control in orthodontic procedure--a preliminary clinical study. Lasers Med Sci. 2011 Sep;26(5):657-63. doi: 10.1007/s10103-011-0938-6. Epub 2011 May 31.
- Background: PubMed 17361391Youssef M, Ashkar S, Hamade E, Gutknecht N, Lampert F, Mir M. The effect of low-level laser therapy during orthodontic movement: a preliminary study. Lasers Med Sci. 2008 Jan;23(1):27-33. doi: 10.1007/s10103-007-0449-7. Epub 2007 Mar 15.
- Background: PubMed 21254890Sousa MV, Scanavini MA, Sannomiya EK, Velasco LG, Angelieri F. Influence of low-level laser on the speed of orthodontic movement. Photomed Laser Surg. 2011 Mar;29(3):191-6. doi: 10.1089/pho.2009.2652. Epub 2011 Jan 23.
Related trials for Malocclusion
Enrolling by invitation
Discision as Acceleration Method in Canine Retraction in Orthodontics With Aligner and Fixed Appliances in Young Adults a Split Mouth Study
Bimaxillary Protrusion, Class II Div 1 Malocclusion
Recruiting
Assessment of the Locally Administrated Vitamin D3 and Corticision Efficacy on Orthodontic Canine Retraction
Malocclusions, Canine Retraction
Not yet recruiting
Timing, Trajectories and Prediction in Severe Dental Crowding: The Create SPACE (cSPACE)
Crowding of Teeth, Malocclusion; Displaced Teeth
Recruiting
FM Technique in Orthodontic Clear Aligner Therapy: A Single-Arm Clinical Study
Malocclusion
Not yet recruiting
Treatment of Mandibular Overjet in Children With Maxillary Retrognathism
Maxillary Retrognathism, Children
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Timothy Shaughnessy, DDS principal investigator
Shaughnessy Orthodontics
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Fixed Orthodontic Appliance Treatment, OrthoPulse™ and Non-Functional OrthoPulse™ in people with Malocclusion, run by Biolux Research Holdings, Inc. at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Sep 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 27 Mar 2018). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Overall Orthodontic Treatment Time for OrthoPulse™ and Non-OrthoPulse™ Treated Patients. (time frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of their orthodontic treatment, an expected average of 1-2 years, depending on the severity of the case.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02267850, which also lists 19 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Sep 2018.