Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation ComplicationPhase 1NCT02271126
TEG Anticoagulation Monitoring During ECMO
A Phase 1 study testing TEG monitoring, APTT monitoring and Heparin in people with Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Complication, run by Policlinico Hospital at 1 site in Italy.
Trial summary
The best anticoagulation strategy during Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) is unknown. Actual recommendations suggest to use unfractionated heparin infusion and monitor the effect with either activated Partial Thromboplastin Time (aPTT) or Activated Clotting Time (ACT). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Complication
- What is being tested?
- TEG monitoring, APTT monitoring and Heparin
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 42 participants
- Where
- 1 siteItaly
- Study dates
- 2 Sep 2014to 30 Nov 2016
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- All patients that initiate ECMO support for acute respiratory failure at our centre or by our equipe at another centre will be screened for eligibility.
Who cannot join
- Patients under the age of 18, with proven Heparin-induced Thrombocytopenia or with a platelets count of less than 30.000/mm3 will be excluded from the study.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Italy1 site
Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda - Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico
Milan, Lombardy, 20131
About this study
Official title: Prospective Randomized Study Of Anticoagulation Monitoring With Thromboelastography Versus aPTT During Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation In Adults
The best anticoagulation strategy during Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) is unknown. Actual recommendations suggest to use unfractionated heparin infusion and monitor the effect with either activated Partial Thromboplastin Time (aPTT) or Activated Clotting Time (ACT). Since hemorrhage is still the major adverse effect of ECMO with impact on mortality and morbidity, the investigators raised a question whether an alternative monitoring technique namely Thromboelastography (TEG) could allow a more accurate management of anticoagulation in this setting. To test this hypothesis the investigators designed a pilot study to test safety and feasibility of an anticoagulation monitoring algorithm based on TEG versus aPTT.
Read the detailed description
Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is frequently used as a supportive tool in the settings of acute severe respiratory and/or circulatory failure. The presence of the extracorporeal circuit and oxygenator bring along the need to anticoagulate the patients in order to prevent activation of the coagulation cascade that can lead to thrombosis of the artificial surfaces and losses of coagulation factors, fibrinogen and platelets. Despite tight monitoring with different anticoagulation essays bleeding remain the main threat for the patients on ECMO, leaving thrombosis as an anecdotic event.
In our institution, anticoagulation during ECMO is monitored mainly with aPTT ratio in a range of 1.5 to 2 (patient to normal). Recently, the investigators started to match Thromboelastography (TEG) assays to activated Partial Thromboplastin Time (aPTT) and Activated Clotting Time (ACT) routine measurements during ECMO. Data from a preliminary analysis of thirty-two patients show that in nearly half of TEG assays, the R (reaction time) parameter which is sensitive to inhibition of fibrin formation by heparin, was consistently prolonged despite aPTT and ACT were in the normal range. In the same patients the investigators registered high rate of bleeding (nearly 40% of patients suffered from clinically significant bleeding, i.e. bleeding that required heparin dose reduction, blood transfusions or interruption of the extracorporeal support). These findings suggests the possibility that the actual target of aPTT ratio might be overrated.
The purpose of this study is to test safety and feasibility of standardized protocol based on TEG versus current practice (aPTT) to manage anticoagulation during ECMO.
40 consecutive adults patients undergoing ECMO will be randomized in either the TEG-driven anticoagulation group or the aPTT-driven group. Written informed consent will be obtained according to national legislation.
In both groups, when the patient is connected to ECMO, an heparin bolus of 50-70 UI/kg (depending on baseline aPTT value) will be administered followed by a continuous infusion of 18 UI/kg/h started; for the first 12 hours thereafter proper anticoagulation level will be monitored with Activated Clotting Time (ACT, therapeutic range 180-210 seconds, performed every 1 or 2 hours according to the standardized protocol). From the thirteenth hour onwards each group will follow either aPTT monitoring or TEG according to randomization. Every morning in both groups aPTT, TEG, Antithrombin and anti-Factor Xa activity will be assessed.
- aPTT-driven group: aPTT ratio target is 1.5 - 2.0 as for actual clinical practice; frequency of aPTT measurements may vary from a minimum of 3 times per day to a maximum of 6 depending on the standardized protocol. When aPTT value falls well below the desired range an heparin bolus will be administered. When too high, infusion will be stopped for either 30 or 60 minutes.
- TEG-driven group: target range of R parameter at Kaolin activated-TEG (R K-TEG) is 16 - 24 minutes; frequency of TEG assays may vary from a minimum of 3 times per day to a maximum of 6 depending on the standardized protocol. When TEG value falls well below the desired range an heparin bolus will be administered, when is too high infusion will be stopped for either 30 or 60 minutes.
Daily management requires haemoglobin, platelets, PT ratio, D-dimer and fibrinogen to be checked 2 to 3 times daily, and maintained at specific values (Hb > 10 g/dl; PLT > 45.000/mm3; Fibrinogen > 150 mg/dl; Antithrombin activity > 70%; PT ratio > 1.5) with haemocomponents transfusion.
Data from each patient will be collected on a daily basis: laboratory exams, hemodynamic status, transfusions, surgery or invasive interventions, extracorporeal lung performance.
End of the study will be at ECMO discontinuation, after that deep vein thrombosis on patients' cannulation sites will be assessed with doppler ultrasound.
- Being tested
- TEG monitoring, APTT monitoring, Heparin
- Keywords
- ECMO, Heparin, Thromboelastography, Bleeding complications
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
TEG monitoringDevice
Also called Thromboelastography
anticoagulation monitoring during ECMO will be according to TEG
APTT monitoringDevice
Also called activated Partial Thromboplastin Time
anticoagulation monitoring during ECMO will be according to aPTT
HeparinDrug
Anticoagulation provided to patients in ECMO
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| TEG | Experimental | TEG-driven anticoagulation group: Anticoagulation will be monitored by TEG. Target will be a range of R parameter at Kaolin activated-TEG (R K-TEG) is 16 - 24 seconds; frequency of TEG assays may vary from a minimum of 3 times per day to a maximum of 6 depending on the standardized protocol. When TEG value falls well below the desired range an heparin bolus will be administered, when is too high infusion will be stopped for either 30 or 60 minutes. Receives: Device: TEG monitoring; Drug: Heparin |
| APTT | Active comparator | APTT-driven anticoagulation group: anticoagulation will be monitored by aPTT. aPTT ratio target is 1.5 - 2.0 as for actual clinical practice; frequency of aPTT measurements may vary from a minimum of 3 times per day to a maximum of 6 depending on the standardized protocol. When aPTT value falls well below the desired range an heparin bolus will be administered. When too high, infusion will be stopped for either 30 or 60 minutes. Receives: Device: APTT monitoring; Drug: Heparin |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Safety
Safety will be addressed by monitoring the need of blood components, number of serious haemorrhagic events, thrombotic events and numbers of circuit replacement (due to circuit "activation" and characterized by a definite score that will be assessed daily).
Measured: Two years
Feasibility
Heparin dose fluctuations and numbers of violation from the standardized protocol will be registered to assess feasibility.
Measured: Two years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Oct 2014 (estimated)
- Study start2 Sep 2014
- Primary completionSep 2016
- Study completion30 Nov 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation ComplicationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 42 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Policlinico Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- The Mediterranean Institute for Transplantation and Advanced Specialized Therapies
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Mauro Panigada, MD, Policlinico Hospital
- Investigators
- Mauro Panigada, MD, Principal investigator, Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda - Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02271126
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 932/2014
- Status last verified
- Jul 2017
- First submitted
- 18 Oct 2014
- Last updated
- 5 Jul 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Panigada M, E Iapichino G, Brioni M, Panarello G, Protti A, Grasselli G, Occhipinti G, Novembrino C, Consonni D, Arcadipane A, Gattinoni L, Pesenti A. Thromboelastography-based anticoagulation management during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a safety and feasibility pilot study. Ann Intensive Care. 2018 Jan 16;8(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s13613-017-0352-8.
PubMed 29340875
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Jul 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Prospective Randomized Study Of Anticoagulation Monitoring With Thromboelastography Versus aPTT During Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation In Adults
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02271126
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 932/2014
- Keywords
- ECMO, Heparin, Thromboelastography, Bleeding complications
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 42 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Policlinico HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- The Mediterranean Institute for Transplantation and Advanced Specialized Therapies
- Study start
- 2 Sep 2014 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Sep 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Nov 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 22 Oct 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The best anticoagulation strategy during Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) is unknown. Actual recommendations suggest to use unfractionated heparin infusion and monitor the effect with either activated Partial Thromboplastin Time (aPTT) or Activated Clotting Time (ACT). Since hemorrhage is still the major adverse effect of ECMO with impact on mortality and morbidity, the investigators raised a question whether an alternative monitoring technique namely Thromboelastography (TEG) could allow a more accurate management of anticoagulation in this setting. To test this hypothesis the investigators designed a pilot study to test safety and feasibility of an anticoagulation monitoring algorithm based on TEG versus aPTT.
Detailed description
Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is frequently used as a supportive tool in the settings of acute severe respiratory and/or circulatory failure. The presence of the extracorporeal circuit and oxygenator bring along the need to anticoagulate the patients in order to prevent activation of the coagulation cascade that can lead to thrombosis of the artificial surfaces and losses of coagulation factors, fibrinogen and platelets. Despite tight monitoring with different anticoagulation essays bleeding remain the main threat for the patients on ECMO, leaving thrombosis as an anecdotic event.
In our institution, anticoagulation during ECMO is monitored mainly with aPTT ratio in a range of 1.5 to 2 (patient to normal). Recently, the investigators started to match Thromboelastography (TEG) assays to activated Partial Thromboplastin Time (aPTT) and Activated Clotting Time (ACT) routine measurements during ECMO. Data from a preliminary analysis of thirty-two patients show that in nearly half of TEG assays, the R (reaction time) parameter which is sensitive to inhibition of fibrin formation by heparin, was consistently prolonged despite aPTT and ACT were in the normal range. In the same patients the investigators registered high rate of bleeding (nearly 40% of patients suffered from clinically significant bleeding, i.e. bleeding that required heparin dose reduction, blood transfusions or interruption of the extracorporeal support). These findings suggests the possibility that the actual target of aPTT ratio might be overrated.
The purpose of this study is to test safety and feasibility of standardized protocol based on TEG versus current practice (aPTT) to manage anticoagulation during ECMO.
40 consecutive adults patients undergoing ECMO will be randomized in either the TEG-driven anticoagulation group or the aPTT-driven group. Written informed consent will be obtained according to national legislation.
In both groups, when the patient is connected to ECMO, an heparin bolus of 50-70 UI/kg (depending on baseline aPTT value) will be administered followed by a continuous infusion of 18 UI/kg/h started; for the first 12 hours thereafter proper anticoagulation level will be monitored with Activated Clotting Time (ACT, therapeutic range 180-210 seconds, performed every 1 or 2 hours according to the standardized protocol). From the thirteenth hour onwards each group will follow either aPTT monitoring or TEG according to randomization. Every morning in both groups aPTT, TEG, Antithrombin and anti-Factor Xa activity will be assessed.
- aPTT-driven group: aPTT ratio target is 1.5 - 2.0 as for actual clinical practice; frequency of aPTT measurements may vary from a minimum of 3 times per day to a maximum of 6 depending on the standardized protocol. When aPTT value falls well below the desired range an heparin bolus will be administered. When too high, infusion will be stopped for either 30 or 60 minutes.
- TEG-driven group: target range of R parameter at Kaolin activated-TEG (R K-TEG) is 16 - 24 minutes; frequency of TEG assays may vary from a minimum of 3 times per day to a maximum of 6 depending on the standardized protocol. When TEG value falls well below the desired range an heparin bolus will be administered, when is too high infusion will be stopped for either 30 or 60 minutes.
Daily management requires haemoglobin, platelets, PT ratio, D-dimer and fibrinogen to be checked 2 to 3 times daily, and maintained at specific values (Hb > 10 g/dl; PLT > 45.000/mm3; Fibrinogen > 150 mg/dl; Antithrombin activity > 70%; PT ratio > 1.5) with haemocomponents transfusion.
Data from each patient will be collected on a daily basis: laboratory exams, hemodynamic status, transfusions, surgery or invasive interventions, extracorporeal lung performance.
End of the study will be at ECMO discontinuation, after that deep vein thrombosis on patients' cannulation sites will be assessed with doppler ultrasound.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| TEG | Experimental | Device: TEG monitoring, Drug: HeparinTEG-driven anticoagulation group: Anticoagulation will be monitored by TEG. Target will be a range of R parameter at Kaolin activated-TEG (R K-TEG) is 16 - 24 seconds; frequency of TEG assays may vary from a minimum of 3 times per day to a maximum of 6 depending on the standardized protocol. When TEG value falls well below the desired range an heparin bolus will be administered, when is too high infusion will be stopped for either 30 or 60 minutes. |
| APTT | Active comparator | Device: APTT monitoring, Drug: HeparinAPTT-driven anticoagulation group: anticoagulation will be monitored by aPTT. aPTT ratio target is 1.5 - 2.0 as for actual clinical practice; frequency of aPTT measurements may vary from a minimum of 3 times per day to a maximum of 6 depending on the standardized protocol. When aPTT value falls well below the desired range an heparin bolus will be administered. When too high, infusion will be stopped for either 30 or 60 minutes. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- All patients that initiate ECMO support for acute respiratory failure at our centre or by our equipe at another centre will be screened for eligibility.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patients under the age of 18, with proven Heparin-induced Thrombocytopenia or with a platelets count of less than 30.000/mm3 will be excluded from the study.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| TEG monitoringAlso: Thromboelastographyanticoagulation monitoring during ECMO will be according to TEG | Device | TEG |
| APTT monitoringAlso: activated Partial Thromboplastin Timeanticoagulation monitoring during ECMO will be according to aPTT | Device | APTT |
| HeparinAnticoagulation provided to patients in ECMO | Drug | APTT, TEG |
Primary outcome
Safety
Time frame: Two years
Safety will be addressed by monitoring the need of blood components, number of serious haemorrhagic events, thrombotic events and numbers of circuit replacement (due to circuit "activation" and characterized by a definite score that will be assessed daily).
Feasibility
Time frame: Two years
Heparin dose fluctuations and numbers of violation from the standardized protocol will be registered to assess feasibility.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Jul 2017.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 29340875Panigada M, E Iapichino G, Brioni M, Panarello G, Protti A, Grasselli G, Occhipinti G, Novembrino C, Consonni D, Arcadipane A, Gattinoni L, Pesenti A. Thromboelastography-based anticoagulation management during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a safety and feasibility pilot study. Ann Intensive Care. 2018 Jan 16;8(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s13613-017-0352-8.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Complication
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Diagnosis of ECMO Cannula Infection: Prospective Comparison of Sampling Methods
ECMO Cannula Infection, Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Complication
Recruiting
Platform of Randomized Adaptive Clinical Trials in Critical Illness
Respiratory Insufficiency, Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Complication
RecruitingObservational study
CytOSorb TreatMent Of Critically Ill PatientS Registry
Septic Shock, Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
Recruiting
ECMO ABI Detection With Hyperfine
Acute Brain Injury, Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Complication
RecruitingPhase 1
Individualized or Conventional Transfusion Strategies During Peripheral VA-ECMO
Cardiogenic Shock, Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Mauro Panigada, MD principal investigator
Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda - Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1 study testing TEG monitoring, APTT monitoring and Heparin in people with Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Complication, run by Policlinico Hospital at 1 site in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Jul 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Safety (time frame: Two years). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02271126, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Jul 2017.