SpasticityETREATNCT02275312
ETREAT Study on Effectiveness of Botulinum Toxin Type A Injections to Treat Post-stroke Upper and/or Lower Limb Spasticity
An observational study of Spasticity, run by Ipsen at 17 sites in Spain.
Trial summary
The objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of BoNT-A on functional improvement in patients with post-stroke upper and/or lower limb spasticity in the early stage of spasticity development, according to routine clinical practice. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Spasticity
- How many people
- 110 participants
- Where
- 17 sitesSpain
- Study dates
- Jul 2014to Jul 2017
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Post-stroke spasticity
Who may be able to join
- Men and women ≥ 18-80 years.
- Poststroke limb spasticity.
- Patients who have suffered a stroke in the previous 6 months.
- Treatment goal has been previously agreed with the patient or their legal representative.
- Patients with clinically significant poststroke upper/lower limb spasticity, in whom it has been decided to perform multidisciplinary treatment with BoNT-A + rehabilitation.
- No previous treatment with BoNT-A.
- Patient is able to follow the protocol.
- Written informed consent.
Who cannot join
- Neuromuscular disease.
- Use of drugs that interfere with neuromuscular transmission.
- Any other condition that could interfere with rehabilitation or evaluation of the results.
- Diagnosis of spasticity not associated with stroke.
- Pregnant or nursing mothers.
- Prior participation in any other study in the 6 months before study entry
Trial locations and contacts
17 sites in 1 country.
17 sites in 1 country
Spain17 sites
Study site
Barcelona
Study site
Bilbao
Study site
Cadiz
Study site
Córdoba
Study site
Granada
Study site
Huelva
Study site
Las Palmas de Gran Canaria
Study site
Lleida
Study site
Madrid
Study site
Murcia
Study site
Palma de Mallorca
Study site
Pontevedra
Study site
Salamanca
Study site
San Sebastián
Study site
Santiago
Study site
Seville
Study site
Valladolid
About this study
Official title: ETREAT: A Prospective Observational Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Botulinum Toxin Type A (BoNT-A) Injections in Patients With Post-stroke Upper and/or Lower Limb Spasticity in the Early Stage of Spasticity Development.
The objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of BoNT-A on functional improvement in patients with post-stroke upper and/or lower limb spasticity in the early stage of spasticity development, according to routine clinical practice.
- Conditions
- Spasticity
- Medical subject headings
- Muscle Spasticity
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in Goal Attainment Scale (GAS) score.
Measured: Baseline, 16 months
Secondary outcomes (11)
Spasticity patterns will be defined in patients with upper and/or lower limb spasticity in the early stage after stroke
Descriptive statistics will be presented in addition to 95% confidence intervals for the mean and percentages
Measured: Baseline, 16 months
Change in Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) score.
Measured: Baseline, 16 months
Baseline characteristics of patients
Demographic characteristics
Measured: Baseline
Percentage of patients reporting functional improvement evaluated by Goal Attainment Scale (GAS) score.
Measured: From baseline up to 16 months
Change in pain according to Visual Analog Scale (VAS).
Measured: Baseline, 16 months
Passive function of upper and/or lower limbs according to primary treatment target (PTT) from the disability assessment scale (DAS).
Measured: Baseline, 16 months
Comfortable barefoot walking speed, measured with the 10-meter walking speed test.
Measured: Baseline, 16 months
Change on EQ-5D quality of life questionnaire
Measured: Baseline, 16 months
Estimation of use of healthcare resources and costs associated with management of spasticity.
Measured: From baseline up to 16 months
Time interval between injections
Measured: From baseline up to 16 months
Cost per patient
Measured: From baseline up to 16 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Oct 2014 (estimated)
- Study startJul 2014
- Primary completionJul 2017
- Study completionJul 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for SpasticityStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by IpsenThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 110 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Ipsen
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Ipsen Medical Director, Study director, Ipsen
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02275312
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- A-92-52120-192
- Acronym
- ETREAT
- Status last verified
- Aug 2019
- First submitted
- 23 Oct 2014
- Last updated
- 16 Aug 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Aug 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- ETREAT: A Prospective Observational Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Botulinum Toxin Type A (BoNT-A) Injections in Patients With Post-stroke Upper and/or Lower Limb Spasticity in the Early Stage of Spasticity Development.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02275312
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ETREAT / A-92-52120-192
- Conditions
- Spasticity
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 110 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- IpsenIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Jul 2014 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Jul 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jul 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 27 Oct 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of BoNT-A on functional improvement in patients with post-stroke upper and/or lower limb spasticity in the early stage of spasticity development, according to routine clinical practice.
Study design
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Post-stroke spasticity
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Men and women ≥ 18-80 years.
- Poststroke limb spasticity.
- Patients who have suffered a stroke in the previous 6 months.
- Treatment goal has been previously agreed with the patient or their legal representative.
- Patients with clinically significant poststroke upper/lower limb spasticity, in whom it has been decided to perform multidisciplinary treatment with BoNT-A + rehabilitation.
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Neuromuscular disease.
- Use of drugs that interfere with neuromuscular transmission.
- Any other condition that could interfere with rehabilitation or evaluation of the results.
- Diagnosis of spasticity not associated with stroke.
- Pregnant or nursing mothers.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Change in Goal Attainment Scale (GAS) score.
Time frame: Baseline, 16 months
11 secondary outcomes
Spasticity patterns will be defined in patients with upper and/or lower limb spasticity in the early stage after stroke
Time frame: Baseline, 16 months
Change in Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) score.
Time frame: Baseline, 16 months
Baseline characteristics of patients
Time frame: Baseline
Percentage of patients reporting functional improvement evaluated by Goal Attainment Scale (GAS) score.
Time frame: From baseline up to 16 months
Change in pain according to Visual Analog Scale (VAS).
Time frame: Baseline, 16 months
Passive function of upper and/or lower limbs according to primary treatment target (PTT) from the disability assessment scale (DAS).
Time frame: Baseline, 16 months
Comfortable barefoot walking speed, measured with the 10-meter walking speed test.
Time frame: Baseline, 16 months
Change on EQ-5D quality of life questionnaire
Time frame: Baseline, 16 months
Estimation of use of healthcare resources and costs associated with management of spasticity.
Time frame: From baseline up to 16 months
Time interval between injections
Time frame: From baseline up to 16 months
Cost per patient
Time frame: From baseline up to 16 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Aug 2019.
Related trials for Spasticity
Recruiting
Telerehabilitation Compared With Clinic-Based Physiotherapy in Children With Spastic Cerebral Palsy
Spastic Cerebral Palsy
Active, not recruiting
Effects of Whole-body Electrical Muscle Stimulation Exercise on Adults With Neuromuscular Disease
Neuromuscular Diseases (NMD), Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
Not yet recruiting
Video-based Visual Feedback Combined With Task-oriented Physiotherapy Among Cerebral Palsy
Cerebral Palsy (CP)
Recruiting
Intrathecal Baclofen and Pediatric Dystonia
Dystonic Cerebral Palsy
RecruitingObservational study
Evaluation of Patients With HAM/TSP
HTLV-I Infection, Tropical Spastic Paraparesis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Ipsen Medical Director study director
Ipsen
17 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Spasticity, run by Ipsen at 17 sites in Spain.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Aug 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 17 sites in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in Goal Attainment Scale (GAS) score. (time frame: Baseline, 16 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Aug 2019.