Metastatic MelanomaPhase 3TILNCT02278887
Study Comparing TIL to Standard Ipilimumab in Patients With Metastatic Melanoma
A Phase 3 study testing Translational research, Cyclophosphamide and Fludarabine in people with Metastatic Melanoma, run by The Netherlands Cancer Institute at 2 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
In this randomized controlled phase III study the investigators will evaluate whether TIL infusion preceded by non-myeloablative chemotherapy and followed by high dose bolus interleukin-2 can result in an improved progression free survival when randomly compared to ipilimumab in 168 stage IV melanoma patients. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Metastatic Melanoma
- What is being tested?
- Translational research, Cyclophosphamide and Fludarabine
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 168 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- 23 Sep 2014to 31 Dec 2023
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Histologically confirmed unresectable AJCC stage III or stage IV melanoma
- Patients must have metastatic melanoma with a resectable metastatic lesion(s) of sufficient size (≥ 2-3 cm in total) and must be willing to undergo such a resection for experimental purposes.
- Patients should have received maximum one line of systemic therapy (except for ipilimumab) for unresectable or metastatic melanoma.[
- Patients must be ≥ 18 years and ≤ 75 years of age and must have measurable disease by CT or MRI per RECIST 1.1 criteria (in addition to the resected lesion).
- Patients must have a clinical performance status of ECOG 0 or 1.
- Patients of both genders must be willing to practice a highly effective method of birth control during treatment and for four months after receiving the preparative regimen.
- Patients must be able to understand and sign the Informed Consent document.
Who cannot join
- Life expectancy of less than three months.
- Patients with metastatic ocular/ mucosal or other non-cutaneous melanoma.
- Adjuvant treatment with ipilimumab within 6 months prior to randomization.
- Requirement for immunosuppressive doses of systemic corticosteroids (>10 mg/day prednisone or equivalent) or other immunosuppressive drugs within the last 3 weeks prior to randomization.
- Patients who have a more than two CNS metastases.
- Patients who have any CNS lesion that is symptomatic, greater than 1 cm in diameter or show significant surrounding edema on MRI scan will not be eligible until they have been treated and demonstrated no clinical or radiologic CNS progression for at least 2 months.
Show all 10Show fewer
- All patients' toxicities due to prior non-systemic treatment must have recovered to a grade 1 or less. Patients may have undergone minor surgical procedures or focal palliative radiotherapy (to non-target lesions) within the past 4 weeks, as long as all toxicities have recovered to grade 1 or less.
- Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding, because of the potentially dangerous effects of the preparative chemotherapy on the fetus or infant.
- Any active systemic infections, coagulation disorders or other active major medical illnesses.
- Any autoimmune disease
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 2 countries.
2 sites in 2 countries
Denmark1 site
CCIT Department of Oncology and Haematology Herlev Hospital
Copenhagen
Netherlands1 site
Netherlands Cancer Institute
Amsterdam, North Holland, 1066CX
About this study
Official title: Randomized Phase III Study Comparing a Non-myeloablative Lymphocyte Depleting Regimen of Chemotherapy Followed by Infusion of Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes and Interleukin-2 to Standard Ipilimumab Treatment in Metastatic Melanoma
In this randomized controlled phase III study the investigators will evaluate whether TIL infusion preceded by non-myeloablative chemotherapy and followed by high dose bolus interleukin-2 can result in an improved progression free survival when randomly compared to ipilimumab in 168 stage IV melanoma patients. A health technology assessment (HTA) will be performed to evaluate the impact of the TIL treatment on patients and organizational processes and cost-effectivity.
Read the detailed description
In this randomized controlled phase III study the investigators will evaluate whether TIL infusion preceded by non-myeloablative chemotherapy and followed by high dose bolus interleukin-2 can result in an improved progression free survival when randomly compared to ipilimumab in 168 stage IV melanoma patients. A health technology assessment (HTA) will be performed to evaluate the impact of the TIL treatment on patients and organizational processes and cost-effectivity. This will be done via questionnaires at baseline, just after treatment and during follow-up. Also healthcare providers will be interviewed after 6 months after starting the trial.
- Conditions
- Metastatic Melanoma
- Being tested
- Translational research, Cyclophosphamide, Fludarabine, Interleukin-2, Ipilimumab infusion
- Keywords
- melanoma, TIL treatment, tumor infiltrating lymphocytes, ipilimumab, interleukin 2, non-myeloablative, randomization
- Medical subject headings
- Melanoma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Translational researchProcedure or surgery
Also called tumor tissue, blood
Before during and at progression/regression biopsies and blood will be taken for translational research
CyclophosphamideDrug
Also called chemotherapy
The patient receives 2 days cyclophosphamide via IV to deplete T-cells.
FludarabineDrug
Also called chemotherapy
The patient receives 5 days fludarabine via IV to deplete T-cells.
Interleukin-2Drug
Also called Proleukin
After infusion of the TIL, the patient receives IL-2 to keep the TIL active.
Ipilimumab infusionDrug
Also called standard treatment
In arm A patients will be treated with 4 infusion of ipilimumab
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Ipilimumab | Active comparator | 4 cycles of ipilimumab treatment, the standard treatment Receives: Procedure: Translational research; Drug: Ipilimumab infusion |
| TIL treatment | Experimental | non-myeloablative lymphocyte depleting regimen of chemotherapy followed by infusion of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes and interleukin-2 Receives: Procedure: Translational research; Drug: Cyclophosphamide; Drug: Fludarabine; Drug: Interleukin-2 |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Progression free survival
Progression free survival according to RECIST 1.1
Measured: 3 years
Secondary outcomes (1)
Immune related progression free survival
Measured: 3 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 Oct 2014 (estimated)
- Study start23 Sep 2014
- Primary completionSep 2022
- Study completion31 Dec 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Metastatic MelanomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by The Netherlands Cancer InstituteThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 168 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Copenhagen University Hospital at Herlev
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- John B.A.G. Haanen, Prof., Principal investigator, The Netherlands Cancer Institute
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02278887
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- M14TIL
- Acronym
- TIL
- Status last verified
- Mar 2025
- First submitted
- 3 Jun 2014
- Last updated
- 10 Mar 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Ten Ham RMT, Rohaan MW, Egeler M, Menezes R, Holz Borch T, Kessels R, Jedema I, Nuijen B, Nijenhuis CM, van de Poll-Franse LV, Geukes Foppen MH, Lindenberg M, Mansfield Noringriis I, Monberg TJ, Donia M, van Harten W, Svane IM, Haanen JBAG, Retel VP. Health-related quality of life of patients with metastatic melanoma treated with tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes compared with ipilimumab in a randomized phase III trial. Ann Oncol. 2025 Oct;36(10):1154-1165. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2025.06.005. Epub 2025 Jun 18.
PubMed 40541863Tas L, Weitemeyer MB, Rohaan MW, Borch TH, van Akkooi ACJ, Wouters MWJM, Hartemink KJ, Schrage YM, Kuijpers A, Kok NFM, van Zon M, Jedema I, Nijenhuis CM, Nuijen B, Hansen M, Voermans C, Klobuch S, Seijkens TTP, Lalezari F, Met O, Donia M, Svane IM, Haanen JBAG, Holmich LR, van Houdt WJ. Surgical considerations for tumour-infiltrating lymphocyte therapy in melanoma: results from a randomized phase III trial. Br J Surg. 2025 May 31;112(6):znaf090. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znaf090.
PubMed 40474841Rohaan MW, Borch TH, van den Berg JH, Met O, Kessels R, Geukes Foppen MH, Stoltenborg Granhoj J, Nuijen B, Nijenhuis C, Jedema I, van Zon M, Scheij S, Beijnen JH, Hansen M, Voermans C, Noringriis IM, Monberg TJ, Holmstroem RB, Wever LDV, van Dijk M, Grijpink-Ongering LG, Valkenet LHM, Torres Acosta A, Karger M, Borgers JSW, Ten Ham RMT, Retel VP, van Harten WH, Lalezari F, van Tinteren H, van der Veldt AAM, Hospers GAP, Stevense-den Boer MAM, Suijkerbuijk KPM, Aarts MJB, Piersma D, van den Eertwegh AJM, de Groot JB, Vreugdenhil G, Kapiteijn E, Boers-Sonderen MJ, Fiets WE, van den Berkmortel FWPJ, Ellebaek E, Holmich LR, van Akkooi ACJ, van Houdt WJ, Wouters MWJM, van Thienen JV, Blank CU, Meerveld-Eggink A, Klobuch S, Wilgenhof S, Schumacher TN, Donia M, Svane IM, Haanen JBAG. Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocyte Therapy or Ipilimumab in Advanced Melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2022 Dec 8;387(23):2113-2125. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2210233.
PubMed 36477031
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Mar 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Randomized Phase III Study Comparing a Non-myeloablative Lymphocyte Depleting Regimen of Chemotherapy Followed by Infusion of Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes and Interleukin-2 to Standard Ipilimumab Treatment in Metastatic Melanoma
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02278887
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- TIL / M14TIL
- Conditions
- Metastatic Melanoma
- Keywords
- melanoma, TIL treatment, tumor infiltrating lymphocytes, ipilimumab, interleukin 2, non-myeloablative, randomization
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 168 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- The Netherlands Cancer InstituteUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Copenhagen University Hospital at Herlev
- Study start
- 23 Sep 2014 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Sep 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 30 Oct 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
In this randomized controlled phase III study the investigators will evaluate whether TIL infusion preceded by non-myeloablative chemotherapy and followed by high dose bolus interleukin-2 can result in an improved progression free survival when randomly compared to ipilimumab in 168 stage IV melanoma patients. A health technology assessment (HTA) will be performed to evaluate the impact of the TIL treatment on patients and organizational processes and cost-effectivity.
Detailed description
In this randomized controlled phase III study the investigators will evaluate whether TIL infusion preceded by non-myeloablative chemotherapy and followed by high dose bolus interleukin-2 can result in an improved progression free survival when randomly compared to ipilimumab in 168 stage IV melanoma patients. A health technology assessment (HTA) will be performed to evaluate the impact of the TIL treatment on patients and organizational processes and cost-effectivity. This will be done via questionnaires at baseline, just after treatment and during follow-up. Also healthcare providers will be interviewed after 6 months after starting the trial.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Ipilimumab | Active comparator | Procedure: Translational research, Drug: Ipilimumab infusion4 cycles of ipilimumab treatment, the standard treatment |
| TIL treatment | Experimental | Procedure: Translational research, Drug: Cyclophosphamide, Drug: Fludarabine, Drug: Interleukin-2non-myeloablative lymphocyte depleting regimen of chemotherapy followed by infusion of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes and interleukin-2 |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Histologically confirmed unresectable AJCC stage III or stage IV melanoma
- Patients must have metastatic melanoma with a resectable metastatic lesion(s) of sufficient size (≥ 2-3 cm in total) and must be willing to undergo such a resection for experimental purposes.
- Patients should have received maximum one line of systemic therapy (except for ipilimumab) for unresectable or metastatic melanoma.[
- Patients must be ≥ 18 years and ≤ 75 years of age and must have measurable disease by CT or MRI per RECIST 1.1 criteria (in addition to the resected lesion).
- Patients must have a clinical performance status of ECOG 0 or 1.
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Life expectancy of less than three months.
- Patients with metastatic ocular/ mucosal or other non-cutaneous melanoma.
- Adjuvant treatment with ipilimumab within 6 months prior to randomization.
- Requirement for immunosuppressive doses of systemic corticosteroids (>10 mg/day prednisone or equivalent) or other immunosuppressive drugs within the last 3 weeks prior to randomization.
- Patients who have a more than two CNS metastases.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Translational researchAlso: tumor tissue, bloodBefore during and at progression/regression biopsies and blood will be taken for translational research | Procedure or surgery | Ipilimumab, TIL treatment |
| CyclophosphamideAlso: chemotherapyThe patient receives 2 days cyclophosphamide via IV to deplete T-cells. | Drug | TIL treatment |
| FludarabineAlso: chemotherapyThe patient receives 5 days fludarabine via IV to deplete T-cells. | Drug | TIL treatment |
| Interleukin-2Also: ProleukinAfter infusion of the TIL, the patient receives IL-2 to keep the TIL active. | Drug | TIL treatment |
| Ipilimumab infusionAlso: standard treatmentIn arm A patients will be treated with 4 infusion of ipilimumab | Drug | Ipilimumab |
Primary outcome
Progression free survival
Time frame: 3 years
Progression free survival according to RECIST 1.1
1 secondary outcome
Immune related progression free survival
Time frame: 3 years
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Mar 2025.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40541863Ten Ham RMT, Rohaan MW, Egeler M, Menezes R, Holz Borch T, Kessels R, Jedema I, Nuijen B, Nijenhuis CM, van de Poll-Franse LV, Geukes Foppen MH, Lindenberg M, Mansfield Noringriis I, Monberg TJ, Donia M, van Harten W, Svane IM, Haanen JBAG, Retel VP. Health-related quality of life of patients with metastatic melanoma treated with tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes compared with ipilimumab in a randomized phase III trial. Ann Oncol. 2025 Oct;36(10):1154-1165. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2025.06.005. Epub 2025 Jun 18.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40474841Tas L, Weitemeyer MB, Rohaan MW, Borch TH, van Akkooi ACJ, Wouters MWJM, Hartemink KJ, Schrage YM, Kuijpers A, Kok NFM, van Zon M, Jedema I, Nijenhuis CM, Nuijen B, Hansen M, Voermans C, Klobuch S, Seijkens TTP, Lalezari F, Met O, Donia M, Svane IM, Haanen JBAG, Holmich LR, van Houdt WJ. Surgical considerations for tumour-infiltrating lymphocyte therapy in melanoma: results from a randomized phase III trial. Br J Surg. 2025 May 31;112(6):znaf090. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znaf090.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36477031Rohaan MW, Borch TH, van den Berg JH, Met O, Kessels R, Geukes Foppen MH, Stoltenborg Granhoj J, Nuijen B, Nijenhuis C, Jedema I, van Zon M, Scheij S, Beijnen JH, Hansen M, Voermans C, Noringriis IM, Monberg TJ, Holmstroem RB, Wever LDV, van Dijk M, Grijpink-Ongering LG, Valkenet LHM, Torres Acosta A, Karger M, Borgers JSW, Ten Ham RMT, Retel VP, van Harten WH, Lalezari F, van Tinteren H, van der Veldt AAM, Hospers GAP, Stevense-den Boer MAM, Suijkerbuijk KPM, Aarts MJB, Piersma D, van den Eertwegh AJM, de Groot JB, Vreugdenhil G, Kapiteijn E, Boers-Sonderen MJ, Fiets WE, van den Berkmortel FWPJ, Ellebaek E, Holmich LR, van Akkooi ACJ, van Houdt WJ, Wouters MWJM, van Thienen JV, Blank CU, Meerveld-Eggink A, Klobuch S, Wilgenhof S, Schumacher TN, Donia M, Svane IM, Haanen JBAG. Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocyte Therapy or Ipilimumab in Advanced Melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2022 Dec 8;387(23):2113-2125. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2210233.
Related trials for Metastatic Melanoma
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1
IL-17 Blockade to Decrease irAEs (REPLAY)
Metastatic Melanoma
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study With Combinations of Anti-LAG-3 and Anti-PD-1 Antibodies in Adult Participants With Advanced or Metastatic Melanoma (Harmony Head-to-Head)
Melanoma
RecruitingPhase 1
Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Immunogenicity Comparison of Bmab1700 and Opdivo® as Adjuvant Monotherapy in Participants With Melanoma
Melanoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
A Study of ST-1898 for Unresectable or Metastatic Melanoma
Unresectable or Metastatic Melanoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
John B.A.G. Haanen, Prof. principal investigator
The Netherlands Cancer Institute
2 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Translational research, Cyclophosphamide and Fludarabine in people with Metastatic Melanoma, run by The Netherlands Cancer Institute at 2 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Mar 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in Denmark, Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Progression free survival (time frame: 3 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02278887, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Mar 2025.