ContraceptionNCT02279043
Online Peer Influence on IUD Behaviors and Attitudes
A study testing Interaction with users of IUC and non-IUC users and Interaction with non-IUC users only in people with Contraception, run by University of California, San Francisco at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This study will look at women's social communication about IUDs (intrauterine devices) and their attitudes and behavior related to IUD use. The researchers will design an online community where women can talk to each other about their experiences with birth control. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 45 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Contraception
- What is being tested?
- Interaction with users of IUC and non-IUC users and Interaction with non-IUC users only
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 630 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Oct 2015to Jul 2016
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 45 years
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Non-IUC users:
- Women
- Age 18 - 45
- Sexually active with men
- Do not want to get pregnant in the next year
- Want to learn more about different birth control methods
Show all 10Show fewer
- IUC users
- Women
- Age 18-45
- Currently uses IUC (Paragard, Mirena, or Skyla)
Who cannot join
- Non-IUC users
- Previous IUC use
- Not able to become pregnant
- IUC users
- -Using IUC for other reason, and not pregnancy prevention
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
University of Pennsylvania, Annenberg School of Communication
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104
About this study
Official title: Peer Influence on Intrauterine Contraceptive Behavior and Attitudes in an Online Social Community
This study will look at women's social communication about IUDs (intrauterine devices) and their attitudes and behavior related to IUD use. The researchers will design an online community where women can talk to each other about their experiences with birth control. We will examine whether social exposure to IUD users in this setting is associated with change in attitudes and behavior among women who have never had an IUD.
Read the detailed description
Study Design:
University of Pennsylvania researchers will conduct a randomized controlled trial to examine whether there is an association between social exposure to women who use intrauterine contraception (IUC) as their method of birth control and change in IUC attitudes and behavior among women who have never used IUC. The intervention used to test this association will be an online social community, designed by the researchers, in which women will be invited to share their personal experiences with birth control methods they have used. Non-IUC user participants will be randomized to either the intervention or control conditions. The intervention condition will consist of small online social groups in which non-IUC user participants will interact with IUC user participants. The control condition will consist of online groups identical to intervention groups, except that no IUC user participants will be in these groups. Participants will interact within small groups for twelve days each. Non-IUC user participants will complete surveys before and after the twelve-day intervention that measure IUC attitudes and behavior. UCSF researchers will conduct analysis on deidentified data obtained from this study.
Hypothesis:
It is hypothesized that among women who have never used IUC, there is an association between social exposure to IUC users and change in attitudes and behavior related to IUC use. It is also hypothesized that exposure to IUC users is associated with positive change in knowledge of IUC use and efficacy and positive change in IUC-related information-seeking.
Aims:
The study has three aims:
Aim 1: To determine whether exposure to IUC users in an online community is associated with change in women's attitudes and behavior related to IUC use.
Aim 2: To determine whether an association between exposure to IUC users and change in women's IUC attitudes and behavior varies by women's race/ethnicity.
Aim 3: To observe the content of women's interactions about IUC and other birth control methods in an online social community.
Data analysis:
In order to address Aim 1, we will first conduct univariate analysis and obtain descriptive statistics (including mean, median, mode, variance, and range) on demographic characteristics and IUC attitudes and behaviors among participants in the intervention and control groups. In bivariate analysis, we will use chi-square tests to examine the relationship between study condition and IUC-related behaviors, as measured on the post-survey. We will use t-tests to examine relationships between condition and post-survey IUC attitudes, and matched t-tests to examine the relationships between conditions and changes in IUC attitudes. If data on attitudes is not normally distributed, we will use the appropriate non-parametric tests instead of t-tests.
We will conduct multivariate analyses for those outcomes associated with intervention condition in bivariate tests. Multivariate analysis for Aim 1 will include mixed-effects regression to examine associations at both the individual and cluster levels. We will use multiple linear regression for continuous outcomes and multiple logistic regression for binary outcomes. Regression models will test associations between intervention and control conditions and outcome IUC attitude and behavior variables. We will obtain regression coefficients from linear regression models and odds ratios from logistic regression models in order to describe the associations between study arms and outcomes.
In order to address Aim 2, we will examine bivariate relationships between the racial/ethnic categories of participants and outcome attitude and behavior variables, using chi-square tests for binary outcomes and t-tests or appropriate non-parametric tests for continuous outcomes. We will use multiple linear and/or logistic regression to test possible associations between race/ethnicity and outcome variables, controlling for other background variables. Resulting regression coefficients and odds ratios will describe whether the effect of the intervention was greater for women in some racial/ethnic groups as compared to others.
In order to address Aim 3, we will perform qualitative analysis of conversations that take place among group members in the online social groups, using grounded theory methodology. We will examine qualitative data from both the intervention and control groups.
Privacy:
Recruitment and participation in the study will occur online. Participants will only interact with the study from remote locations, so they will not be seen entering or leaving any location affiliated with the study, or interacting with any study personnel. Once registered in the study, participants will only be contacted via secure email that does not indicate the nature of the study in the subject line. The study website will be password-protected to prohibit access to Internet users not participating in the study. Participants' screen names on the site will not contain their real names, and they will not be identifiable to other study participants.
There is minimal risk of privacy loss. Study participants may not want others to know about their interest in or use of birth control, and may have feelings of embarrassment or shame in the event of a loss of study privacy. Additionally, birth control use may be a sensitive topic in the personal relationships of some study participants, and a loss of privacy could lead to strain or conflict in these personal relationships.
Confidentiality:
Data collected by researchers at the University of Pennsylvania will be stored on a secure network at their site. Only University of Pennsylvania study staff will have access to data on this network. University of PEnnsylvania staff will remove all identifiers from the data and export the data to researchers at UCSF via secure email. Deidentified data will be stored at on a secure UCSF server. Only the study staff will have access to the data, and we will not have access to the key.
- Conditions
- Contraception
- Being tested
- Interaction with users of IUC and non-IUC users, Interaction with non-IUC users only
- Keywords
- IUD, IUC, birth control, contraception, online
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Interaction with users of IUC and non-IUC usersBehavioural
Birth Control Connect is an online community where women will be invited to share their personal experiences with birth control. Birth Control Connect group sessions will last for twelve days. Each day, participants will be prompted to respond to questions in the group (e.g. "If you're using a birth control method right now, how did you choose it?"). Participants will also be able to pose questions to other members of the group and respond to other members' questions. Half of participants in Birth Control Connect intervention groups will be current IUC users.
Interaction with non-IUC users onlyBehavioural
Birth Control Connect is an online community where women will be invited to share their personal experiences with birth control. Birth Control Connect group sessions will last for twelve days. Each day, participants will be prompted to respond to questions in the group (e.g. "If you're using a birth control method right now, how did you choose it?"). Participants will also be able to pose questions to other members of the group and respond to other members' questions.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Experimental | IUC users and non-IUC user participants randomized to the intervention arm will take part in small intervention groups in an online community called Birth Control Connect for twelve days. There will be up to 35 intervention groups with 9 members each. Non-IUC users in these groups will receive the intervention of Interaction with users of IUC and non-IUC users in the context of the online community. About 50% of participants in intervention groups will be current IUC users, and 50% will not be current IUC users. We will measure the attitudes and behaviors of those who do not have IUC before and after the intervention, considering social exposure to IUC users as a possible predictor of changes in knowledge, attitude and behavior. Receives: Behavioral: Interaction with users of IUC and non-IUC users |
| Control | Placebo comparator | Participants randomized to the control arm will take part in Birth Control Connect control groups identical to those in the intervention arm, except no participants in the control arm will be current IUC users. Therefore, participants in the control arm will have interaction with non-IUC users only. We will measure these participants' attitudes and behavior related to IUC use before and after the twelve-day study period, and compare results to those of participants in the intervention arm. There will be up to 35 control groups of 9 members each. Receives: Behavioral: Interaction with non-IUC users only |
| IUC users | No intervention | IUC users will be recruited to populate intervention groups. Interaction with IUC users will be the intervention for non-IUC users randomized to the intervention arm. IUC users will receive no intervention. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Participants Reporting IUC Use
Self-reported use of IUC in post-survey
Measured: 12 days post-baseline
Secondary outcomes (12)
Mean Change in Attitude About Hormonal IUC as Method for Self Between Pre-survey and Post-survey
Mean difference of responses to scale in pre- and post-surveys asking participants to rate hormonal IUC as a contraceptive method for themselves, with 0=terrible method and 10=great method
Measured: 12 days post-baseline
Mean Change in Attitude About Hormonal IUC as Method for Women in General Between Pre-survey and Post-survey
Responses to scale in pre- and post-surveys asking participants to rate hormonal IUC as a contraceptive method for women in general, with 0=terrible method and 10=great method
Measured: 12 days post-baseline
Mean Change in Attitude About Non-hormonal IUC as Method for Self Between Pre-survey and Post-survey
Responses to scale in pre- and post-surveys asking participants to rate non-hormonal IUC as a contraceptive method for themselves, with 0=terrible method and 10=great method
Measured: 12 days post-baseline
Mean Change in Attitude About Non-hormonal IUC as Method for Women in General Between Pre-survey and Post-survey
Responses to scale in pre- and post-surveys asking participants to rate non-hormonal IUC as a contraceptive method for women in general, with 0=terrible method and 10=great method
Measured: 12 days post-baseline
Number of Participants With Responses Indicating Knowledge of IUC Safety
Response on 5-point Likert scale of agreement in post-survey on IUC safety. Dichotomized as 4 or 5 (Agree or strongly agree) vs. 1, 2, or 3 (Strongly disagree, disagree, or neither agree nor disagree). Outcome is count of participants responding 4 or 5.
Measured: 12 days post-baseline
Number of Participants With Responses Indicating Knowledge of IUC Effectiveness
Response on 5-point Likert scale of agreement in post-survey on IUC effectiveness. Dichotomized as 4 or 5 (Agree or strongly agree) vs. 1, 2, or 3 (Strongly disagree, disagree, or neither agree nor disagree). Outcome is count of participants responding 4 or 5.
Measured: 12 days post-baseline
Number of Participants With Responses Indicating Knowledge of IUC Being More Effective Than Birth Control Pill
Correct response to post-survey item asking whether IUC is more, less, or as effective as the birth control pill (correct response: more effective).
Measured: 12 days post-baseline
Number of Participants Reporting Informational Support (Receiving New Information From Birth Control Connect)
Response on 5-point Likert scale of agreement in post-survey on whether Birth Control Connect group gave participants information on IUC they didn't have before. Dichotomized as 4 or 5 (Agree or strongly agree) vs. 1, 2, or 3 (Strongly disagree, disagree, or neither agree nor disagree). Outcome is count of participants responding 4 or 5.
Measured: 12 days post-baseline
Number of Participants Reporting Informational Support (Better Idea of What IUC Would be Like)
Response on 5-point Likert scale of agreement in post-survey on whether Birth Control Connect gave them a better idea of what using IUC would be like. Dichotomized as 4 or 5 (Agree or strongly agree) vs. 1, 2, or 3 (Strongly disagree, disagree, or neither agree nor disagree). Outcome is count of participants responding 4 or 5.
Measured: 12 days post-baseline
Number of Participants Reporting Information-seeking on Internet
Report (Yes/No) in post-survey of whether participant had looked on the Internet (outside of Birth Control Connect) for information on IUC since study start. Outcome is count of participants reporting yes.
Measured: 12 days post-baseline
Number of Participants Reporting Information-seeking From a Health Care Provider
Report (Yes/No) in post-survey of whether participant had consulted a health care provider about IUC since study start. Outcome is count of participants reporting yes.
Measured: 12 days post-baseline
Number of Participants Reporting Information-seeking From Peers
Report (Yes/No) in post-survey of whether participant had talked to women they know about IUC since study start. Outcome is count of participants reporting yes.
Measured: 12 days post-baseline
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 Oct 2014 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2015
- Primary completionJul 2016
- Study completionJul 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for ContraceptionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of California, San FranciscoThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 630 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of California, San Francisco
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, University of Pennsylvania
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Christine Dehlendorf, University of California, San Francisco
- Investigators
- Damon Centola, PhD, Principal investigator, University of Pennsylvania, Annenberg School of CommunicationChristine Dehlendorf, MD, MAS, Principal investigator, University of California, San Francisco
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02279043
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2014-9716
- Other IDs
- 820383, 14-14827
- Status last verified
- Mar 2019
- First submitted
- 27 Oct 2014
- Last updated
- 19 Mar 2019
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: Deidentified data will be shared with UCSF researchers through secure email.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Mar 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Peer Influence on Intrauterine Contraceptive Behavior and Attitudes in an Online Social Community
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02279043
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2014-9716
- Conditions
- Contraception
- Keywords
- IUD, IUC, birth control, contraception, online
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 630 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of California, San FranciscoUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, University of Pennsylvania
- Study start
- Oct 2015
- Primary completion
- Jul 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jul 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 30 Oct 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 11 Mar 2019
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study will look at women's social communication about IUDs (intrauterine devices) and their attitudes and behavior related to IUD use. The researchers will design an online community where women can talk to each other about their experiences with birth control. We will examine whether social exposure to IUD users in this setting is associated with change in attitudes and behavior among women who have never had an IUD.
Detailed description
Study Design:
University of Pennsylvania researchers will conduct a randomized controlled trial to examine whether there is an association between social exposure to women who use intrauterine contraception (IUC) as their method of birth control and change in IUC attitudes and behavior among women who have never used IUC. The intervention used to test this association will be an online social community, designed by the researchers, in which women will be invited to share their personal experiences with birth control methods they have used. Non-IUC user participants will be randomized to either the intervention or control conditions. The intervention condition will consist of small online social groups in which non-IUC user participants will interact with IUC user participants. The control condition will consist of online groups identical to intervention groups, except that no IUC user participants will be in these groups. Participants will interact within small groups for twelve days each. Non-IUC user participants will complete surveys before and after the twelve-day intervention that measure IUC attitudes and behavior. UCSF researchers will conduct analysis on deidentified data obtained from this study.
Hypothesis:
It is hypothesized that among women who have never used IUC, there is an association between social exposure to IUC users and change in attitudes and behavior related to IUC use. It is also hypothesized that exposure to IUC users is associated with positive change in knowledge of IUC use and efficacy and positive change in IUC-related information-seeking.
Aims:
The study has three aims:
Aim 1: To determine whether exposure to IUC users in an online community is associated with change in women's attitudes and behavior related to IUC use.
Aim 2: To determine whether an association between exposure to IUC users and change in women's IUC attitudes and behavior varies by women's race/ethnicity.
Aim 3: To observe the content of women's interactions about IUC and other birth control methods in an online social community.
Data analysis:
In order to address Aim 1, we will first conduct univariate analysis and obtain descriptive statistics (including mean, median, mode, variance, and range) on demographic characteristics and IUC attitudes and behaviors among participants in the intervention and control groups. In bivariate analysis, we will use chi-square tests to examine the relationship between study condition and IUC-related behaviors, as measured on the post-survey. We will use t-tests to examine relationships between condition and post-survey IUC attitudes, and matched t-tests to examine the relationships between conditions and changes in IUC attitudes. If data on attitudes is not normally distributed, we will use the appropriate non-parametric tests instead of t-tests.
We will conduct multivariate analyses for those outcomes associated with intervention condition in bivariate tests. Multivariate analysis for Aim 1 will include mixed-effects regression to examine associations at both the individual and cluster levels. We will use multiple linear regression for continuous outcomes and multiple logistic regression for binary outcomes. Regression models will test associations between intervention and control conditions and outcome IUC attitude and behavior variables. We will obtain regression coefficients from linear regression models and odds ratios from logistic regression models in order to describe the associations between study arms and outcomes.
In order to address Aim 2, we will examine bivariate relationships between the racial/ethnic categories of participants and outcome attitude and behavior variables, using chi-square tests for binary outcomes and t-tests or appropriate non-parametric tests for continuous outcomes. We will use multiple linear and/or logistic regression to test possible associations between race/ethnicity and outcome variables, controlling for other background variables. Resulting regression coefficients and odds ratios will describe whether the effect of the intervention was greater for women in some racial/ethnic groups as compared to others.
In order to address Aim 3, we will perform qualitative analysis of conversations that take place among group members in the online social groups, using grounded theory methodology. We will examine qualitative data from both the intervention and control groups.
Privacy:
Recruitment and participation in the study will occur online. Participants will only interact with the study from remote locations, so they will not be seen entering or leaving any location affiliated with the study, or interacting with any study personnel. Once registered in the study, participants will only be contacted via secure email that does not indicate the nature of the study in the subject line. The study website will be password-protected to prohibit access to Internet users not participating in the study. Participants' screen names on the site will not contain their real names, and they will not be identifiable to other study participants.
There is minimal risk of privacy loss. Study participants may not want others to know about their interest in or use of birth control, and may have feelings of embarrassment or shame in the event of a loss of study privacy. Additionally, birth control use may be a sensitive topic in the personal relationships of some study participants, and a loss of privacy could lead to strain or conflict in these personal relationships.
Confidentiality:
Data collected by researchers at the University of Pennsylvania will be stored on a secure network at their site. Only University of Pennsylvania study staff will have access to data on this network. University of PEnnsylvania staff will remove all identifiers from the data and export the data to researchers at UCSF via secure email. Deidentified data will be stored at on a secure UCSF server. Only the study staff will have access to the data, and we will not have access to the key.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Experimental | Behavioral: Interaction with users of IUC and non-IUC usersIUC users and non-IUC user participants randomized to the intervention arm will take part in small intervention groups in an online community called Birth Control Connect for twelve days. There will be up to 35 intervention groups with 9 members each. Non-IUC users in these groups will receive the intervention of Interaction with users of IUC and non-IUC users in the context of the online community. About 50% of participants in intervention groups will be current IUC users, and 50% will not be current IUC users. We will measure the attitudes and behaviors of those who do not have IUC before and after the intervention, considering social exposure to IUC users as a possible predictor of changes in knowledge, attitude and behavior. |
| Control | Placebo comparator | Behavioral: Interaction with non-IUC users onlyParticipants randomized to the control arm will take part in Birth Control Connect control groups identical to those in the intervention arm, except no participants in the control arm will be current IUC users. Therefore, participants in the control arm will have interaction with non-IUC users only. We will measure these participants' attitudes and behavior related to IUC use before and after the twelve-day study period, and compare results to those of participants in the intervention arm. There will be up to 35 control groups of 9 members each. |
| IUC users | No intervention | –IUC users will be recruited to populate intervention groups. Interaction with IUC users will be the intervention for non-IUC users randomized to the intervention arm. IUC users will receive no intervention. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 45 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Women
- Age 18 - 45
- Sexually active with men
- Do not want to get pregnant in the next year
- Want to learn more about different birth control methods
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Non-IUC users
- Previous IUC use
- Not able to become pregnant
- IUC users
- -Using IUC for other reason, and not pregnancy prevention
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Interaction with users of IUC and non-IUC usersBirth Control Connect is an online community where women will be invited to share their personal experiences with birth control. Birth Control Connect group sessions will last for twelve days. Each day, participants will be prompted to respond to questions in the group (e.g. "If you're using a birth control method right now, how did you choose it?"). Participants will also be able to pose questions to other members of the group and respond to other members' questions. Half of participants in Birth Control Connect intervention groups will be current IUC users. | Behavioural | Intervention |
| Interaction with non-IUC users onlyBirth Control Connect is an online community where women will be invited to share their personal experiences with birth control. Birth Control Connect group sessions will last for twelve days. Each day, participants will be prompted to respond to questions in the group (e.g. "If you're using a birth control method right now, how did you choose it?"). Participants will also be able to pose questions to other members of the group and respond to other members' questions. | Behavioural | Control |
Primary outcome
Number of Participants Reporting IUC Use
Time frame: 12 days post-baseline
Self-reported use of IUC in post-survey
12 secondary outcomes
Mean Change in Attitude About Hormonal IUC as Method for Self Between Pre-survey and Post-survey
Time frame: 12 days post-baseline
Mean Change in Attitude About Hormonal IUC as Method for Women in General Between Pre-survey and Post-survey
Time frame: 12 days post-baseline
Mean Change in Attitude About Non-hormonal IUC as Method for Self Between Pre-survey and Post-survey
Time frame: 12 days post-baseline
Mean Change in Attitude About Non-hormonal IUC as Method for Women in General Between Pre-survey and Post-survey
Time frame: 12 days post-baseline
Number of Participants With Responses Indicating Knowledge of IUC Safety
Time frame: 12 days post-baseline
Number of Participants With Responses Indicating Knowledge of IUC Effectiveness
Time frame: 12 days post-baseline
Number of Participants With Responses Indicating Knowledge of IUC Being More Effective Than Birth Control Pill
Time frame: 12 days post-baseline
Number of Participants Reporting Informational Support (Receiving New Information From Birth Control Connect)
Time frame: 12 days post-baseline
Number of Participants Reporting Informational Support (Better Idea of What IUC Would be Like)
Time frame: 12 days post-baseline
Number of Participants Reporting Information-seeking on Internet
Time frame: 12 days post-baseline
Number of Participants Reporting Information-seeking From a Health Care Provider
Time frame: 12 days post-baseline
Number of Participants Reporting Information-seeking From Peers
Time frame: 12 days post-baseline
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Mar 2019.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Deidentified data will be shared with UCSF researchers through secure email.
Related trials for Contraception
Enrolling by invitation
Flo Digital Contraceptive Study
Contraception Use
Recruiting
Estimating the Impact of Sexuality Education and Mobile Health Services on Reproductive Health and Empowerment Among Adolescents in Sierra Leone for the Family Planning Impact Lab
Reproductive Health, Sexual Health
RecruitingPhase 4
Clinical and Biomarker Effects of Depot Medroxyprogesterone Acetate in Females With Sickle Cell Disease
Sickle Cell Disease (SCD), Vaso-Occlusive Pain Episode in Sickle Cell Disease
Not yet recruitingObservational study
FLOW: Influence of the Menstrual Cycle on Alcohol Use in Women
Alcohol Use, Alcohol Consumption
Not yet recruiting
Impact of Gender-Transformative Interventions on Contraceptive Use and Reproductive Autonomy in Somalia
Contraceptive Behavior, Social Norms
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Damon Centola, PhD principal investigator
University of Pennsylvania, Annenberg School of Communication
Christine Dehlendorf, MD, MAS principal investigator
University of California, San Francisco
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Interaction with users of IUC and non-IUC users and Interaction with non-IUC users only in people with Contraception, run by University of California, San Francisco at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Mar 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 11 Mar 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Participants Reporting IUC Use (time frame: 12 days post-baseline). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Mar 2019.