Catheter-Related InfectionsATAPACNCT02279121
ATAPAC Study (TauroLock Activity in Adult Cancer Patients)
A study testing Taurolock and saline solution in people with Catheter-Related Infections, run by Centre Hospitalier Régional Metz-Thionville at 1 site in France.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of a lock taurolidine-citrate solution vs standard saline solution for primary prevention of central venous catheter-associated bloodstream infection in adult patients treated with intra-venous therapy for a solid tumor Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Catheter-Related Infections
- What is being tested?
- Taurolock and saline solution
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 162 participants
- Where
- 1 siteFrance
- Study dates
- Nov 2014to Mar 2016
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients older than 18 years
- Performance Index (WHO score) ≤ 2
- Patient with a solid cancer receiving an IV anti-tumor treatment
- Presence of a totally implantable CVC
- Anti-tumoral therapy administered by a totally implantable CVC
- Metastatic and / or (neo) adjuvant treatment
Show all 9Show fewer
- Full hospitalised and / or day-hospital patients
- Informed written consent
- Social Health security insurance
Who cannot join
- Hematological cancer patients
- HIV-positive patients and/ or patients receiving an active immunosuppressive therapy
- Patients presenting a febrile episode within 4 days prior to randomisation
- Patients with neutropenia grade ≥ 2 (ANC ≤ 1000/mm3) on a blood testing older than 7 days
- Patients on IV antibiotic therapy
- Patients on total and / or peripheral parental nutrition
Show all 12Show fewer
- Patients with a previous CLABSI history
- Allergy to citrate or taurolidine
- Patients who are not able to give an informed consent
- Patients under guardianship
- Patients under judicial protection
- Pregnant or breastfeeding woman
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial Evaluating the Efficacy of a Lock-therapy With a Solution of Taurolidine/Citrate (TauroLock) vs Standard Saline Solution for the Primary Prevention of Catheter-related Infections (CLI) in Adult Patients Wtih a Non-hematological Cancer Treated With Intravenous Anti-tumor Therapy
The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of a lock taurolidine-citrate solution vs standard saline solution for primary prevention of central venous catheter-associated bloodstream infection in adult patients treated with intra-venous therapy for a solid tumor
Read the detailed description
The central venous catheter (CVC)-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) represent a serious and persistent health problem in cancer patients with an implantable CVC receiving an intravenous (IV) anti-tumor therapy. The CLABSI include the CVC-associated bacteremia and the negative bloodstream local or generalized infections. CLABSI significantly increase morbidity and hospital costs. They can lead also to discontinuation of IV anti-tumor treatment, a severe sepsis, a septic shock or a death. Microbial colonization and biofilm development, which are resistant to antibiotic therapy, often lead to CVC replacement. CLABSI prevention is a key measure to improve clinical outcomes, particularly in patients at high risk. For this reason, CLABSI prevention is a national priority of the healthcare program. Taurolidine [bis-(1,1-dioxoperhydro-1,2,4-thiadiazinyl-4) methane] is an antimicrobial agent which kills and inhibits a wide range of micro-organisms in vitro, including multidrug resistant bacteria. A catheter lock solution was developed containing 1.35% taurolidine and 4% citrate. Due to the anti-adhesion activity of the taurolidine and anti-thrombotic properties of the citrate, this lock solution can disrupt bacterial adhesion to the inner surface of the implantable CVC preventing the production of biofilm. This lock solution showed a substantial reduction in the formation of biofilm and bacterial colonization of the inner surface of the implantable CVC is several prospective trials.
In a study of pediatric cancers receiving IV anti-tumor treatment, the use of a lock solution of taurolidine-citrate resulted in a reduction of Gram-positive CLABSI as compared to a control group of patients treated with a standard heparin lock solution. In another study of 71 pediatric patients, taurolidine-citrate solution reduced CLABSI compared with heparin (0.3 vs 1.3 infections per 1000 catheter-days, p: 0.03). Microbial colonization was found in 25.4% of the catheters. Regarding the toxicity, 7 patients only in the taurolidine-citrate group (20%) experienced side effects, the most being nausea, vomiting and abnormal sensations of taste.
Some clinical trials have also demonstrated the efficacy of taurolidine-citrate in terms of CLABSI reduction in patients on home total parenteral nutrition and in hemodialysis patients.
According to the French guidelines, an anti-bacterial lock therapy (preferably taurolidine) may be used as prevention in patients at increased risk of serious CLABSI complications. However, the effectiveness of the lock taurolidine-citrate solution for adult patients with solid tumors receiving an anti-tumor treatment via a totally implantable CVC is actually unknown and it remains to be assessed.
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE
- To compare the efficacy of a lock taurolidine-citrate solution vs standard saline solution for primary prevention of CLABSI in adult patients treated with IV anti-tumor therapy for a solid tumor.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES
- To compare the impact of CLABSI in the 2 groups in terms of days of hospitalisation, delay of IV anti-tumoral treatment, costs of CVC removal and CLABSI-management
- To evaluate the adverse effects of the lock taurolidine-citrate solution in adult patients receiving an IV anti-tumor therapy for solid tumor PRIMARY ENDPOINT: Incidence rates of CLABSI per 1000 catheter-days
SECONDARY ENDPOINTS
- Days of CLABSI-related hospitalisation
- Anti-tumor treatment CLABSI-related delay
- Total CVC-removal for CLABSI
- Costs associated with the CLABSI management in the perspective of health insurance
- Evaluation of the taurolidine-citrate solution-related adverse effects
METHODOLOGY
- Single-center prospective, randomized, open-label, controlled, clinical phase IV trial
- 1:1 randomization
Stratification:
- Metastatic vs (neo) adjuvant
- Age ≤ 70 years vs > 70 years
PROCEDURES During a standard clinical visit for IV anti-tumor treatment administration, the investigator informs the patient of the study procedures and check the eligibility criteria. At the beginning of the next cure, he collects his informed consent and performs randomisation. The patient is then included in the TauroLock ™ or saline arm.
At the beginning of each course, a nurse removes the lock TauroLock ™ and / or makes rinsing the CVC. At the end of each course, she rinses again the CVC and instills TauroLock ™ solution for patients in the TauroLock ™ arm. Patients will be followed for each treatment, according to the same rhythm of their anti-tumor treatment program up to the end of the study: the end of the IV anti-tumor treatment, the CVC removal for mechanical reasons or a CLABSI.
A follow-up visit will be performed 7-30 days after the study end.
PATIENTS NUMBER Based on surveillance data of nosocomial infections at our institution, the incidence of CLABSI in the control group is expected to about 3 per 1000 catheter-days.
Assuming that the use of TauroLock ™ will reduce at least this rate by three (expected 1 per 1000 in the treated group rate), which is consistent with literature data, 9785 days must be followed in each group (α and β risk at 5% and 10%, respectively).
Considering a mean follow-up of 4 months, we need for 81 patients pour any treatment group, 162 patients for the 2 groups.
TRIAL TIME
Duration of the inclusion period:
- 6 months
Duration of participation for each patient:
- Duration of IV anti-tumor treatment + 1 month of follow-up
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Verification of the homogeneity of the groups for major confounding factors: WHO performance status, indication for anti-tumor treatment (metastatic vs (neo)-adjuvant cancer), age, duration of follow-up, type of anti-tumor treatment (weekly, every 15 or 21 days) and type of hospitalisation (full vs day-hospital). Qualitative variables will be compared between the 2 groups by Chi-square test or Fisher exact test if the normality conditions are not met. Quantitative variables are compared by Student's t test or non parametric Wilcoxon test if the normality conditions are not met.
Primary endpoint: the incidence of CLABSI will be compared between groups by a logistic regression test with adjustment for stratification and confounding factors, if necessary.
Secondary endpoints: the qualitative criteria will be compared between the 2 groups by Chi-square test or Fisher exact test if the conditions of normality are not met. The quantitative criteria will be compared by Student's t test or non parametric Wilcoxon test if the conditions of normality are not met.
The α risk is set at 5%.
EXPECTED BENEFITS The expected benefits are a direct reduction of CLABSI for adult cancer patients receiving IV anti-tumor treatment via a CVC leading to a direct reduction of morbidity and mortality. In addition, a better control of CLABSI should allow a cost savings. A literature review by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (Atlanta, USA) estimated between $ 29,156 and 7288 the cost of CLABSI. Similarly, a report by the Institute for Research and Documentation in Health Economics (IRDES), based on the PMSI (Program of medicalization of information systems) data, estimated that CLABSI entailed an additional cost of € 10,950 (+ / - 1690) and a extending of the hospitalisation of 14.7 days (+ / - 1.84). Finally, a reduction of the CLABSI should globally lead to a less use of antibiotics and to a consequently reduced probability of resistant organisms selection.
QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN Data will be recorded in a paper case report form from medical records.
The accuracy and completeness of data will be monitored by a study coordinator :
- 100% inform consent, eligibility criteria and safety data
- 20% data recorded in CRF (case report form) Data will be registered in Microsoft Office ACCESS 2003 Base. It's a single-center study so thre're no special procedures to address registry operations and analysis activities. Safety data like reporting for adverse event will be made by fax with The CRPV (centre régional de pharmacovogilance de Nancy).
The security of the data transfer is assured by the french "Méthodologie de Référence MR001" (Comission Nationale Informatique et Liberté).
- Conditions
- Catheter-Related Infections
- Being tested
- Taurolock, saline solution
- Keywords
- central venous catheter, Taurolidine, lock-therapy
- Medical subject headings
- Catheter-Related Infections
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
TaurolockDevice
Also called solution of taurolidine-citrate
At the beginning of each course of IV anti-tumor treatment, a nurse removes the lock TauroLock ™ and makes rinsing the CVC. At the end of each course, she rinses again the CVC and instills TauroLock ™ solution. Patients will be followed for each treatment, according to the same rhythm of their anti-tumor treatment program up to the end of the study
saline solutionDrug
At the beginning of each course of IV anti-tumor treatment, a nurse makes rinsing the CVC. At the end of each course, she rinses again the CVC. Patients will be followed for each treatment, according to the same rhythm of their anti-tumor treatment program up to the end of the study
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| TauroLock | Experimental | solution of taurolidine-citrate Receives: Device: Taurolock |
| Control | Other | saline solution Receives: Drug: saline solution |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
central venous catheter-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI)
incidence rates of CLABSI per 1000 catheter-days
Measured: during the IV anti-tumor treatment + 1 month of follow-up = 5 months on average and for up to 11 months
Secondary outcomes (5)
days of CLABSI-related hospitalisation
Measured: during the IV anti-tumor treatment + 1 month of follow-up = 5 months on average and for up to 11 months
Anti-tumor treatment CLABSI-related delay
Measured: during the IV anti-tumor treatment + 1 month of follow-up = 5 months on average and for up to 11 months
Total CVC removal for CLABSI
Measured: during the IV anti-tumor treatment + 1 month of follow-up = 5 months on average and for up to 11 months
Costs associated with the CLABSI management in the perspective of health insurance
Measured: during the IV anti-tumor treatment + 1 month of follow-up = 5 months on average and for up to 11 months
Evaluation of the taurolidine-citrate solution-related adverse effects
Measured: during the IV anti-tumor treatment + 1 month of follow-up = 5 months on average and for up to 11 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 Oct 2014 (estimated)
- Study startNov 2014
- Primary completionMar 2016
- Study completionMar 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (19)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Catheter-Related InfectionsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 162 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Centre Hospitalier Régional Metz-Thionville
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- centre régional de pharmacovigilance de Nancy, Theradial
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Raffaele LONGO, MD, Principal investigator, CHR Metz Thionville
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02279121
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2014-01-CHRMT
- Other IDs
- 2014-A01117-40
- Acronym
- ATAPAC
- Status last verified
- Aug 2016
- First submitted
- 9 Oct 2014
- Last updated
- 24 Jun 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Quarello F, Forneris G. Prevention of hemodialysis catheter-related bloodstream infection using an antimicrobial lock. Blood Purif. 2002;20(1):87-92. doi: 10.1159/000046990.
PubMed 11803164Allon M. Prophylaxis against dialysis catheter-related bacteremia with a novel antimicrobial lock solution. Clin Infect Dis. 2003 Jun 15;36(12):1539-44. doi: 10.1086/375234. Epub 2003 Jun 6.
PubMed 12802753Betjes MG, van Agteren M. Prevention of dialysis catheter-related sepsis with a citrate-taurolidine-containing lock solution. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2004 Jun;19(6):1546-51. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfh014. Epub 2004 Feb 19.
PubMed 14993498Mandolfo S, Borlandelli S, Elli A. Catheter lock solutions: it's time for a change. J Vasc Access. 2006 Jul-Sep;7(3):99-102. doi: 10.1177/112972980600700302.
PubMed 17019660Taylor C, Cahill J, Gerrish M, Little J. A new haemodialysis catheter-locking agent reduces infections in haemodialysis patients. J Ren Care. 2008 Sep;34(3):116-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-6686.2008.00027.x.
PubMed 18786077Solomon LR, Cheesbrough JS, Ebah L, Al-Sayed T, Heap M, Millband N, Waterhouse D, Mitra S, Curry A, Saxena R, Bhat R, Schulz M, Diggle P. A randomized double-blind controlled trial of taurolidine-citrate catheter locks for the prevention of bacteremia in patients treated with hemodialysis. Am J Kidney Dis. 2010 Jun;55(6):1060-8. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2009.11.025. Epub 2010 Mar 6.
PubMed 20207458Filiopoulos V, Hadjiyannakos D, Koutis I, Trompouki S, Micha T, Lazarou D, Vlassopoulos D. Approaches to prolong the use of uncuffed hemodialysis catheters: results of a randomized trial. Am J Nephrol. 2011;33(3):260-8. doi: 10.1159/000324685. Epub 2011 Mar 2.
PubMed 21372561Solomon LR, Cheesbrough JS, Bhargava R, Mitsides N, Heap M, Green G, Diggle P. Observational study of need for thrombolytic therapy and incidence of bacteremia using taurolidine-citrate-heparin, taurolidine-citrate and heparin catheter locks in patients treated with hemodialysis. Semin Dial. 2012 Mar-Apr;25(2):233-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-139X.2011.00951.x. Epub 2011 Sep 15.
PubMed 21916999Zhao Y, Li Z, Zhang L, Yang J, Yang Y, Tang Y, Fu P. Citrate versus heparin lock for hemodialysis catheters: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Kidney Dis. 2014 Mar;63(3):479-90. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2013.08.016. Epub 2013 Oct 11.
PubMed 24125729Toure A, Lauverjat M, Peraldi C, Boncompain-Gerard M, Gelas P, Barnoud D, Chambrier C. Taurolidine lock solution in the secondary prevention of central venous catheter-associated bloodstream infection in home parenteral nutrition patients. Clin Nutr. 2012 Aug;31(4):567-70. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2012.01.001. Epub 2012 Jan 28.
PubMed 22285029Lebeaux D, Larroque B, Gellen-Dautremer J, Leflon-Guibout V, Dreyer C, Bialek S, Froissart A, Hentic O, Tessier C, Ruimy R, Pelletier AL, Crestani B, Fournier M, Papo T, Barry B, Zarrouk V, Fantin B. Clinical outcome after a totally implantable venous access port-related infection in cancer patients: a prospective study and review of the literature. Medicine (Baltimore). 2012 Nov;91(6):309-318. doi: 10.1097/MD.0b013e318275ffe1.
PubMed 23117849Zwiech R, Adelt M, Chrul S. A Taurolidine-Citrate-Heparin Lock Solution Effectively Eradicates Pathogens From the Catheter Biofilm in Hemodialysis Patients. Am J Ther. 2016 Mar-Apr;23(2):e363-8. doi: 10.1097/MJT.0b013e31828d4610.
PubMed 23665885Shah CB, Mittelman MW, Costerton JW, Parenteau S, Pelak M, Arsenault R, Mermel LA. Antimicrobial activity of a novel catheter lock solution. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2002 Jun;46(6):1674-9. doi: 10.1128/AAC.46.6.1674-1679.2002.
PubMed 12019075Torres-Viera C, Thauvin-Eliopoulos C, Souli M, DeGirolami P, Farris MG, Wennersten CB, Sofia RD, Eliopoulos GM. Activities of taurolidine in vitro and in experimental enterococcal endocarditis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2000 Jun;44(6):1720-4. doi: 10.1128/AAC.44.6.1720-1724.2000.
PubMed 10817739Simon A, Ammann RA, Wiszniewsky G, Bode U, Fleischhack G, Besuden MM. Taurolidine-citrate lock solution (TauroLock) significantly reduces CVAD-associated grampositive infections in pediatric cancer patients. BMC Infect Dis. 2008 Jul 29;8:102. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-8-102.
PubMed 18664278
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Jun 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial Evaluating the Efficacy of a Lock-therapy With a Solution of Taurolidine/Citrate (TauroLock) vs Standard Saline Solution for the Primary Prevention of Catheter-related Infections (CLI) in Adult Patients Wtih a Non-hematological Cancer Treated With Intravenous Anti-tumor Therapy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02279121
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ATAPAC / 2014-01-CHRMT
- Conditions
- Catheter-Related Infections
- Keywords
- central venous catheter, Taurolidine, lock-therapy
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 162 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Centre Hospitalier Régional Metz-ThionvilleUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- centre régional de pharmacovigilance de Nancy, Theradial
- Study start
- Nov 2014
- Primary completion
- Mar 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- Mar 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 30 Oct 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of a lock taurolidine-citrate solution vs standard saline solution for primary prevention of central venous catheter-associated bloodstream infection in adult patients treated with intra-venous therapy for a solid tumor
Detailed description
The central venous catheter (CVC)-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) represent a serious and persistent health problem in cancer patients with an implantable CVC receiving an intravenous (IV) anti-tumor therapy. The CLABSI include the CVC-associated bacteremia and the negative bloodstream local or generalized infections. CLABSI significantly increase morbidity and hospital costs. They can lead also to discontinuation of IV anti-tumor treatment, a severe sepsis, a septic shock or a death. Microbial colonization and biofilm development, which are resistant to antibiotic therapy, often lead to CVC replacement. CLABSI prevention is a key measure to improve clinical outcomes, particularly in patients at high risk. For this reason, CLABSI prevention is a national priority of the healthcare program. Taurolidine [bis-(1,1-dioxoperhydro-1,2,4-thiadiazinyl-4) methane] is an antimicrobial agent which kills and inhibits a wide range of micro-organisms in vitro, including multidrug resistant bacteria. A catheter lock solution was developed containing 1.35% taurolidine and 4% citrate. Due to the anti-adhesion activity of the taurolidine and anti-thrombotic properties of the citrate, this lock solution can disrupt bacterial adhesion to the inner surface of the implantable CVC preventing the production of biofilm. This lock solution showed a substantial reduction in the formation of biofilm and bacterial colonization of the inner surface of the implantable CVC is several prospective trials.
In a study of pediatric cancers receiving IV anti-tumor treatment, the use of a lock solution of taurolidine-citrate resulted in a reduction of Gram-positive CLABSI as compared to a control group of patients treated with a standard heparin lock solution. In another study of 71 pediatric patients, taurolidine-citrate solution reduced CLABSI compared with heparin (0.3 vs 1.3 infections per 1000 catheter-days, p: 0.03). Microbial colonization was found in 25.4% of the catheters. Regarding the toxicity, 7 patients only in the taurolidine-citrate group (20%) experienced side effects, the most being nausea, vomiting and abnormal sensations of taste.
Some clinical trials have also demonstrated the efficacy of taurolidine-citrate in terms of CLABSI reduction in patients on home total parenteral nutrition and in hemodialysis patients.
According to the French guidelines, an anti-bacterial lock therapy (preferably taurolidine) may be used as prevention in patients at increased risk of serious CLABSI complications. However, the effectiveness of the lock taurolidine-citrate solution for adult patients with solid tumors receiving an anti-tumor treatment via a totally implantable CVC is actually unknown and it remains to be assessed.
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE
- To compare the efficacy of a lock taurolidine-citrate solution vs standard saline solution for primary prevention of CLABSI in adult patients treated with IV anti-tumor therapy for a solid tumor.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES
- To compare the impact of CLABSI in the 2 groups in terms of days of hospitalisation, delay of IV anti-tumoral treatment, costs of CVC removal and CLABSI-management
- To evaluate the adverse effects of the lock taurolidine-citrate solution in adult patients receiving an IV anti-tumor therapy for solid tumor PRIMARY ENDPOINT: Incidence rates of CLABSI per 1000 catheter-days
SECONDARY ENDPOINTS
- Days of CLABSI-related hospitalisation
- Anti-tumor treatment CLABSI-related delay
- Total CVC-removal for CLABSI
- Costs associated with the CLABSI management in the perspective of health insurance
- Evaluation of the taurolidine-citrate solution-related adverse effects
METHODOLOGY
- Single-center prospective, randomized, open-label, controlled, clinical phase IV trial
- 1:1 randomization
Stratification:
- Metastatic vs (neo) adjuvant
- Age ≤ 70 years vs > 70 years
PROCEDURES During a standard clinical visit for IV anti-tumor treatment administration, the investigator informs the patient of the study procedures and check the eligibility criteria. At the beginning of the next cure, he collects his informed consent and performs randomisation. The patient is then included in the TauroLock ™ or saline arm.
At the beginning of each course, a nurse removes the lock TauroLock ™ and / or makes rinsing the CVC. At the end of each course, she rinses again the CVC and instills TauroLock ™ solution for patients in the TauroLock ™ arm. Patients will be followed for each treatment, according to the same rhythm of their anti-tumor treatment program up to the end of the study: the end of the IV anti-tumor treatment, the CVC removal for mechanical reasons or a CLABSI.
A follow-up visit will be performed 7-30 days after the study end.
PATIENTS NUMBER Based on surveillance data of nosocomial infections at our institution, the incidence of CLABSI in the control group is expected to about 3 per 1000 catheter-days.
Assuming that the use of TauroLock ™ will reduce at least this rate by three (expected 1 per 1000 in the treated group rate), which is consistent with literature data, 9785 days must be followed in each group (α and β risk at 5% and 10%, respectively).
Considering a mean follow-up of 4 months, we need for 81 patients pour any treatment group, 162 patients for the 2 groups.
TRIAL TIME
Duration of the inclusion period:
- 6 months
Duration of participation for each patient:
- Duration of IV anti-tumor treatment + 1 month of follow-up
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Verification of the homogeneity of the groups for major confounding factors: WHO performance status, indication for anti-tumor treatment (metastatic vs (neo)-adjuvant cancer), age, duration of follow-up, type of anti-tumor treatment (weekly, every 15 or 21 days) and type of hospitalisation (full vs day-hospital). Qualitative variables will be compared between the 2 groups by Chi-square test or Fisher exact test if the normality conditions are not met. Quantitative variables are compared by Student's t test or non parametric Wilcoxon test if the normality conditions are not met.
Primary endpoint: the incidence of CLABSI will be compared between groups by a logistic regression test with adjustment for stratification and confounding factors, if necessary.
Secondary endpoints: the qualitative criteria will be compared between the 2 groups by Chi-square test or Fisher exact test if the conditions of normality are not met. The quantitative criteria will be compared by Student's t test or non parametric Wilcoxon test if the conditions of normality are not met.
The α risk is set at 5%.
EXPECTED BENEFITS The expected benefits are a direct reduction of CLABSI for adult cancer patients receiving IV anti-tumor treatment via a CVC leading to a direct reduction of morbidity and mortality. In addition, a better control of CLABSI should allow a cost savings. A literature review by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (Atlanta, USA) estimated between $ 29,156 and 7288 the cost of CLABSI. Similarly, a report by the Institute for Research and Documentation in Health Economics (IRDES), based on the PMSI (Program of medicalization of information systems) data, estimated that CLABSI entailed an additional cost of € 10,950 (+ / - 1690) and a extending of the hospitalisation of 14.7 days (+ / - 1.84). Finally, a reduction of the CLABSI should globally lead to a less use of antibiotics and to a consequently reduced probability of resistant organisms selection.
QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN Data will be recorded in a paper case report form from medical records.
The accuracy and completeness of data will be monitored by a study coordinator :
- 100% inform consent, eligibility criteria and safety data
- 20% data recorded in CRF (case report form) Data will be registered in Microsoft Office ACCESS 2003 Base. It's a single-center study so thre're no special procedures to address registry operations and analysis activities. Safety data like reporting for adverse event will be made by fax with The CRPV (centre régional de pharmacovogilance de Nancy).
The security of the data transfer is assured by the french "Méthodologie de Référence MR001" (Comission Nationale Informatique et Liberté).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| TauroLock | Experimental | Device: Taurolocksolution of taurolidine-citrate |
| Control | Other | Drug: saline solutionsaline solution |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Patients older than 18 years
- Performance Index (WHO score) ≤ 2
- Patient with a solid cancer receiving an IV anti-tumor treatment
- Presence of a totally implantable CVC
- Anti-tumoral therapy administered by a totally implantable CVC
Key exclusion criteria (12 listed)
- Hematological cancer patients
- HIV-positive patients and/ or patients receiving an active immunosuppressive therapy
- Patients presenting a febrile episode within 4 days prior to randomisation
- Patients with neutropenia grade ≥ 2 (ANC ≤ 1000/mm3) on a blood testing older than 7 days
- Patients on IV antibiotic therapy
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| TaurolockAlso: solution of taurolidine-citrateAt the beginning of each course of IV anti-tumor treatment, a nurse removes the lock TauroLock ™ and makes rinsing the CVC. At the end of each course, she rinses again the CVC and instills TauroLock ™ solution. Patients will be followed for each treatment, according to the same rhythm of their anti-tumor treatment program up to the end of the study | Device | TauroLock |
| saline solutionAt the beginning of each course of IV anti-tumor treatment, a nurse makes rinsing the CVC. At the end of each course, she rinses again the CVC. Patients will be followed for each treatment, according to the same rhythm of their anti-tumor treatment program up to the end of the study | Drug | Control |
Primary outcome
central venous catheter-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI)
Time frame: during the IV anti-tumor treatment + 1 month of follow-up = 5 months on average and for up to 11 months
incidence rates of CLABSI per 1000 catheter-days
5 secondary outcomes
days of CLABSI-related hospitalisation
Time frame: during the IV anti-tumor treatment + 1 month of follow-up = 5 months on average and for up to 11 months
Anti-tumor treatment CLABSI-related delay
Time frame: during the IV anti-tumor treatment + 1 month of follow-up = 5 months on average and for up to 11 months
Total CVC removal for CLABSI
Time frame: during the IV anti-tumor treatment + 1 month of follow-up = 5 months on average and for up to 11 months
Costs associated with the CLABSI management in the perspective of health insurance
Time frame: during the IV anti-tumor treatment + 1 month of follow-up = 5 months on average and for up to 11 months
Evaluation of the taurolidine-citrate solution-related adverse effects
Time frame: during the IV anti-tumor treatment + 1 month of follow-up = 5 months on average and for up to 11 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Jun 2026.
- Background: PubMed 11803164Quarello F, Forneris G. Prevention of hemodialysis catheter-related bloodstream infection using an antimicrobial lock. Blood Purif. 2002;20(1):87-92. doi: 10.1159/000046990.
- Background: PubMed 12802753Allon M. Prophylaxis against dialysis catheter-related bacteremia with a novel antimicrobial lock solution. Clin Infect Dis. 2003 Jun 15;36(12):1539-44. doi: 10.1086/375234. Epub 2003 Jun 6.
- Background: PubMed 14993498Betjes MG, van Agteren M. Prevention of dialysis catheter-related sepsis with a citrate-taurolidine-containing lock solution. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2004 Jun;19(6):1546-51. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfh014. Epub 2004 Feb 19.
- Background: PubMed 17019660Mandolfo S, Borlandelli S, Elli A. Catheter lock solutions: it's time for a change. J Vasc Access. 2006 Jul-Sep;7(3):99-102. doi: 10.1177/112972980600700302.
- Background: PubMed 18786077Taylor C, Cahill J, Gerrish M, Little J. A new haemodialysis catheter-locking agent reduces infections in haemodialysis patients. J Ren Care. 2008 Sep;34(3):116-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-6686.2008.00027.x.
- Background: PubMed 20207458Solomon LR, Cheesbrough JS, Ebah L, Al-Sayed T, Heap M, Millband N, Waterhouse D, Mitra S, Curry A, Saxena R, Bhat R, Schulz M, Diggle P. A randomized double-blind controlled trial of taurolidine-citrate catheter locks for the prevention of bacteremia in patients treated with hemodialysis. Am J Kidney Dis. 2010 Jun;55(6):1060-8. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2009.11.025. Epub 2010 Mar 6.
- Background: PubMed 21372561Filiopoulos V, Hadjiyannakos D, Koutis I, Trompouki S, Micha T, Lazarou D, Vlassopoulos D. Approaches to prolong the use of uncuffed hemodialysis catheters: results of a randomized trial. Am J Nephrol. 2011;33(3):260-8. doi: 10.1159/000324685. Epub 2011 Mar 2.
- Background: PubMed 21916999Solomon LR, Cheesbrough JS, Bhargava R, Mitsides N, Heap M, Green G, Diggle P. Observational study of need for thrombolytic therapy and incidence of bacteremia using taurolidine-citrate-heparin, taurolidine-citrate and heparin catheter locks in patients treated with hemodialysis. Semin Dial. 2012 Mar-Apr;25(2):233-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-139X.2011.00951.x. Epub 2011 Sep 15.
- Background: PubMed 24125729Zhao Y, Li Z, Zhang L, Yang J, Yang Y, Tang Y, Fu P. Citrate versus heparin lock for hemodialysis catheters: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Kidney Dis. 2014 Mar;63(3):479-90. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2013.08.016. Epub 2013 Oct 11.
- Background: PubMed 22285029Toure A, Lauverjat M, Peraldi C, Boncompain-Gerard M, Gelas P, Barnoud D, Chambrier C. Taurolidine lock solution in the secondary prevention of central venous catheter-associated bloodstream infection in home parenteral nutrition patients. Clin Nutr. 2012 Aug;31(4):567-70. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2012.01.001. Epub 2012 Jan 28.
- Background: PubMed 23117849Lebeaux D, Larroque B, Gellen-Dautremer J, Leflon-Guibout V, Dreyer C, Bialek S, Froissart A, Hentic O, Tessier C, Ruimy R, Pelletier AL, Crestani B, Fournier M, Papo T, Barry B, Zarrouk V, Fantin B. Clinical outcome after a totally implantable venous access port-related infection in cancer patients: a prospective study and review of the literature. Medicine (Baltimore). 2012 Nov;91(6):309-318. doi: 10.1097/MD.0b013e318275ffe1.
- Background: PubMed 23665885Zwiech R, Adelt M, Chrul S. A Taurolidine-Citrate-Heparin Lock Solution Effectively Eradicates Pathogens From the Catheter Biofilm in Hemodialysis Patients. Am J Ther. 2016 Mar-Apr;23(2):e363-8. doi: 10.1097/MJT.0b013e31828d4610.
- Prévention des infections associées aux chambres à cathéter implantables pour accès veineux. Recommandations professionnelles par consensus formalisé d'experts. Mars 2012Link provided by the sponsor.
- Nestrigue, C., Or, Z. Surcoût des événements indésirables associés aux soins à l'hôpital. Premières estimations à partir de neuf indicateurs de sécurité des patients. Document de Travail IRDES n°44. Février 2012Link provided by the sponsor.
- Ministère de la santé, de la jeunesse et des sports DGS/DHOS, CTINILS. Définition des infections associées aux soins (mai 2007)Link provided by the sponsor.
- CTCAE version 4.0Link provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Catheter-Related Infections
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Novel Antimicrobial Solution to Prevent Infections
Kidney Stone, Infection
RecruitingPhase 4
Open-Label Study to Assess Safety and Time to Catheter-related Bloodstream Infections (CRBSI) in Subjects From Birth to < 18 Years of Age
Catheter-Related Infections
Recruiting
Effectiveness of the NowCath Foley in Reducing Catheter-Associated UTIs and Blockages in Long-Term Indwelling Catheter Users (REDUCE)
Urinary Catheters, Urinary Catheterization
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Efficacy and Safety of Peripherally Inserted Central Venous Catheters
Critical Illness, Catheter-Related Infections
RecruitingPhase 4
Secondary Prevention of VTE in Patients With Cancer and Catheter-Related Upper Extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis
Venous Thromboembolism, Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Raffaele LONGO, MD principal investigator
CHR Metz Thionville
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Taurolock and saline solution in people with Catheter-Related Infections, run by Centre Hospitalier Régional Metz-Thionville at 1 site in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
central venous catheter-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) (time frame: during the IV anti-tumor treatment + 1 month of follow-up = 5 months on average and for up to 11 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02279121, which also lists 19 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Jun 2026.