PainPhase 4NCT02280291
Single Shot Versus OnQ Pump in Extremity Fractures
A Phase 4 study testing Ankle SSB, Ankle OnQ and DR SSB in people with Pain and Fracture, run by NYU Langone Health at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Peripheral nerve blocks have been well studied in the literature with generally good results for controlling post operative pain following orthopaedic surgery. Regional anesthesia has many benefits. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 90 years
- What is being tested?
- Ankle SSB, Ankle OnQ and DR SSB
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 100 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Aug 2013to 13 Dec 2018
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 90 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients at least 18 years old.
- Male or Female
- All racial and ethnic groups
- Fractures and fracture/dislocations of the foot, ankle, tibia, fibula, elbow, forearm, wrist and hand
- Patients who opt for surgical treatment of their fractures.
- Patients who consent to be randomized.
- Patients who are willing to follow-up for a minimum of 52 weeks.
Who cannot join
- Patients younger than 18 years old.
- Patients who are on chronic opioids
- Patients who abuse opioids
- Patients who are unwilling to follow-up for a minimum of 52 weeks.
- Neurologic condition that could interfere with pain sensation
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Hospital for Joint Diseases
New York, New York, 10003
About this study
Official title: Comparison Between Single Shot Peripheral Nerve Block and Continuous Infusion Via a On-Q Pump in Extremity Fracture Operations: a Randomized Prospective Control Trial
Peripheral nerve blocks have been well studied in the literature with generally good results for controlling post operative pain following orthopaedic surgery. Regional anesthesia has many benefits. It provides excellent intraoperative anesthesia and muscle relaxation as well as analgesia that continues into the post-operative period. These regional blocks are also effective in controlling pain in the immediate post-operative period. However, as the block wears off, patients begin experiencing increased pain. Compared to patients treated without regional blocks, these patients will often experience a "rebound pain"--pain occurring 12-24 hours after surgery that is subjectively worse than that in patients treated without regional blocks. Therefore, the investigators propose to use a continuous infusion of anesthetic in order to provide sustained pain control post-operatively. Preoperatively, patients will be randomized into a single shot peripheral nerve block versus a continuous infusion of peripheral nerve block. Post-operatively, pain will be assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (1-100) prior to being discharged from PACU. Time to discharge and amount of pain medication taken will be recorded. Patients will be contacted at certain time intervals postoperatively to assess their pain scale and pain medication intake. Patients will be seen for routine post-operative follow-up visits where they will be assessed for satisfaction, pain, residual neurological symptoms, and signs of infection.
Read the detailed description
Purpose The purpose of this randomized prospective study will be to compare post-operative pain control after extremity fracture fixation surgery between patients who receive single shot versus continuous peripheral nerve blocks.
Scientific or Scholarly Rationale Peripheral nerve blocks have been well studied in the literature with generally good results for controlling post operative pain following orthopaedic surgery 1-4. Regional anesthesia has many benefits. It provides excellent intraoperative anesthesia and muscle relaxation as well as analgesia that continues into the post-operative period. Airway manipulations are avoided, post-operative nausea and vomiting are diminished, post-anesthesia care unit stay are shortened, and fewer nursing interventions in the post-anesthesia care unit are required5-6.
Patients who have operative fixation of extremity fractures (ankle, wrist, forearm) are typically ambulatory patients. However, many become hospitalized overnight secondary to inadequate pain control, increasing hospital costs. Goldstein et al. showed that patients who underwent popliteal blocks after ankle fracture fixation demonstrated significantly better pain control immediately postoperatively7. The need for overnight hospitalization secondary to pain is decreased, as are nonsurgical operating room times.
Despite the success of regional anesthesia, a phenomenon known as "rebound pain" has been shown to occur as the original block wears off7-9. Patients with blocks will experience significantly increased pain compared to those without blocks approximately 12-24 hours after surgery. This can be controlled with early narcotic administration but can be a source of significant discomfort to a patient if not recognized and treated in time. A few studies have shown that continuous infusions of various numbing agents are efficacious in prolonged pain control, even in the ambulatory setting10-12. Nevertheless, no studies have thus performed a randomized prospective control trial studying the efficacy of continuous infusion therapy on pain control following extremity fracture surgery.
Aims
- To determine the effectiveness of continuously infused regional anesthetic for pain control in extremity fracture surgery
- To determine the effect of rebound pain on patient satisfaction of surgery Description of study and study procedure Consent All patients being treated with open reduction internal fixation for foot, ankle, tibia, elbow, forearm and wrist fractures at New York University Medical Center, NYU-Hospital for Joint Diseases will be asked to participate in this study. At the patients preoperative office visit, they will be asked to participate in the study and provided a copy of the consent form at that time which they can take home with them. All questions will be answered and they will be asked verbally if they will consent to being a part of the study. Patients will then have the opportunity to either sign the written consent forms or wait till the surgical date to think about the study and any additional questions they may have. At the time of surgery, patients will be consented for surgery. If the patient did not give written consent at the preoperative visit, they will be asked if they have any questions about the study. All questions will again be answered. They will then be asked verbally if they are willing to participate in the study, if they respond yes, then written consent will be obtained at that time.
Randomization Patients will then be randomized (using an online randomizer, similar to a flip of a coin) to one of two anesthetic protocols: regional block with single dose of anesthetic versus regional block with continuous infusion using an OnQ pump. If for some reason, the anesthesiologist feels that a patient would benefit from one type of anesthesia over another, the patient will be removed from the study and given that type of anesthesia.
Intervention Patients will be randomized to one of two anesthetic protocols: general anesthesia/sedation with a single shot, peripheral nerve block versus general anesthesia/sedation with a continuous, peripheral nerve block.
All anesthesia will be provided by an attending anesthesiologist with or without an anesthesiology resident/CRNA. Patients will have standard ASA monitors placed (pulse oximeter, blood pressure, EKG) and an intravenous line started. Sedation will be given using a combination of midazolam (1-4 mg) and fentanyl (25-100 mcg). Patients in both groups will receive an ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve block. The block will be either an infraclavicular brachial plexus block or a popliteal nerve block, depending on the location of the fracture. The appropriate region will be prepped with a chlorohexidine solution on the appropriate surgical side and the appropriate site will be visualized under ultrasound. For the group receiving a single shot block, a 22 gauge, 3.5 inch needle will be used and 20cc of 2% lidocaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine + 20 cc of 0.5% bupivacaine with 1:300,000 epinephrine will be injected around the nerve after confirming negative aspiration every 5 cc. For those receiving a continuous infusion, a 17 gauge Tuohy needle will be used and 20cc of 2% lidocaine with epinephrine + 20 cc of 0.5% bupivacaine with 1:300,000 epinephrine will be injected around the nerve after confirming negative aspiration every 5cc. Once the injection is complete, an indwelling catheter will be placed with its tip location confirmed and then secured at the skin.
After placement of the regional block, general anesthesia/sedation will be administered and maintained at the discretion of the anesthesiologist. Induction of anesthesia will involve IV propofol (2mg/kg) and fentanyl (1-2mcg/kg). Neuromuscular blockade will be used at the discretion of the anesthesiologist and will be reversed appropriately. Anesthetic maintenance will involve inhalational agents, IV agents, air, and oxygen. Fentanyl will be the only intraoperative analgesic used and will be dosed as determined by the anesthesiologist.
After completion of the surgery, patients will be taken to the PACU where those with continuous catheters will have an OnQ pump attached to it. The patient will begin receiving a continuous infusion of 0.2% ropivacaine through the catheter at a rate of 8 cc/hr. The patient will be discharged home with the catheter for 48 hours. The study participant will self-discontinue the catheter in 2 days. This involves removing the tegaderm dressing and gently pulling the catheter out from under the skin. A bandage may then be applied. Germaine Cuff, the investigators anesthesiology RN, will be available via phone to answer any questions study participants may have regarding discontinuation of the catheter. Breakthrough pain while in the PACU will be treated with IV fentanyl and PO Percocet as needed.
Postoperatively, all patients will be discharged home with a prescription for Percocet 5/325 with instructions to take 1-2 tabs every 4-6hrs as needed for pain.
Data collection Location and type of surgical procedure, duration of procedure, and duration of intravenous sedation will also be recorded. Total time in the operating room will also be noted. Time admitted to PACU, time clinically ready for discharge, time actually discharge, PACU medications for nausea/vomiting and PACU meds for pain will all be recorded prior to discharge.
Post-operative pain will be assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (0-100) prior to being discharged from PACU. Time to discharge and amount of pain medication taken in the PACU will be recorded.
Patients will be contacted 8 hours, 12 hours, 24 hours, 48 hours and 72hrs after surgery by the operative surgeon or research coordinator to assess their pain scale and pain medication intake. Patients will be seen for routine post-operative follow-up visits at two, six, twelve, twenty-four, and fifty-two weeks. At these times, patients will be assessed for pain, residual neurological symptoms, and signs of infection. Patients will also be asked if they were satisfied with their postoperative pain control. Total duration of study will be fifty-two weeks. Data collection documents will be distributed to the patients at time of surgery to assist in patient understanding.
- Being tested
- Ankle SSB, Ankle OnQ, DR SSB, DR OnQ
- Medical subject headings
- Pain, Fractures, Bone
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Ankle SSBDrug
general anesthesia/sedation with a single shot; Primary predictor variable: single shot block, a 22 gauge, 3.5 inch needle will be used and 20cc of 2% lidocaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine + 20cc of 0.5% bupivacaine with 1:300,000 epinephrine will be injected around the nerve after confirming negative aspiration every 5 cc.
Ankle OnQDrug
versus regional block with continuous infusion using an OnQ pump. 17 gauge Tuohy needle will be used and 20cc of 2% lidocaine with epinephrine +20cc of 0.5% bupivacaine with1:300,000epinephrine will be injected around the nerve after confirming negative aspiration every 5cc.
DR SSBDrug
general anesthesia/sedationwith a single shot; general anesthesia/sedation with a single shot; Primary predictor variable: single shot block, a 22 gauge, 3.5 inch needle will be used and 20cc of 2% lidocaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine + 20cc of 0.5% bupivacaine with 1:300,000 epinephrine will be injected around the nerve after confirming negative aspiration every 5 cc.
DR OnQDrug
versus regional block with continuous infusion using an OnQ pump. 17 gauge Tuohy needle will be used and 20cc of 2% lidocaine with epinephrine +20cc of 0.5% bupivacaine with1:300,000epinephrine will be injected around the nerve after confirming negative aspiration every 5cc.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Ankle Single Shot Block (SSB) | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Drug: Ankle SSB |
| Ankle OnQ (Continuos Sedation OnQ Pump) | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: Ankle OnQ |
| DR SSB | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: DR SSB |
| DR OnQ | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: DR OnQ |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in Score on Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
The visual analog scale (VAS) is a validated, subjective measure for acute and chronic pain. Scores are recorded by making a handwritten mark on a 10-cm line that represents a continuum between 0 ("no pain") and 10 ("worst pain").
Measured: 2 weeks, 6 weeks
Secondary outcomes (1)
Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Score
The disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) questionnaire is a self-administered region-specific outcome instrument developed as a measure of self-rated upper-extremity disability and symptoms. The DASH consists mainly of a 30-item disability/symptom scale, scored 0 (no disability) to 100.
Measured: 2 Weeks, 6 Weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted31 Oct 2014 (estimated)
- Study startAug 2013
- Primary completion13 Dec 2018
- Study completion13 Dec 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by NYU Langone HealthThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- NYU Langone Health
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Nirmal Tejwani, MD, Principal investigator, NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02280291
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 12-03598
- Status last verified
- Mar 2020
- First submitted
- 15 Oct 2014
- Last updated
- 30 Mar 2020
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Mar 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparison Between Single Shot Peripheral Nerve Block and Continuous Infusion Via a On-Q Pump in Extremity Fracture Operations: a Randomized Prospective Control Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02280291
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 12-03598
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- NYU Langone HealthUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Aug 2013
- Primary completion
- 13 Dec 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 13 Dec 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 31 Oct 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 30 Mar 2020
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Peripheral nerve blocks have been well studied in the literature with generally good results for controlling post operative pain following orthopaedic surgery. Regional anesthesia has many benefits. It provides excellent intraoperative anesthesia and muscle relaxation as well as analgesia that continues into the post-operative period. These regional blocks are also effective in controlling pain in the immediate post-operative period. However, as the block wears off, patients begin experiencing increased pain. Compared to patients treated without regional blocks, these patients will often experience a "rebound pain"--pain occurring 12-24 hours after surgery that is subjectively worse than that in patients treated without regional blocks. Therefore, the investigators propose to use a continuous infusion of anesthetic in order to provide sustained pain control post-operatively. Preoperatively, patients will be randomized into a single shot peripheral nerve block versus a continuous infusion of peripheral nerve block. Post-operatively, pain will be assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (1-100) prior to being discharged from PACU. Time to discharge and amount of pain medication taken will be recorded. Patients will be contacted at certain time intervals postoperatively to assess their pain scale and pain medication intake. Patients will be seen for routine post-operative follow-up visits where they will be assessed for satisfaction, pain, residual neurological symptoms, and signs of infection.
Detailed description
Purpose The purpose of this randomized prospective study will be to compare post-operative pain control after extremity fracture fixation surgery between patients who receive single shot versus continuous peripheral nerve blocks.
Scientific or Scholarly Rationale Peripheral nerve blocks have been well studied in the literature with generally good results for controlling post operative pain following orthopaedic surgery 1-4. Regional anesthesia has many benefits. It provides excellent intraoperative anesthesia and muscle relaxation as well as analgesia that continues into the post-operative period. Airway manipulations are avoided, post-operative nausea and vomiting are diminished, post-anesthesia care unit stay are shortened, and fewer nursing interventions in the post-anesthesia care unit are required5-6.
Patients who have operative fixation of extremity fractures (ankle, wrist, forearm) are typically ambulatory patients. However, many become hospitalized overnight secondary to inadequate pain control, increasing hospital costs. Goldstein et al. showed that patients who underwent popliteal blocks after ankle fracture fixation demonstrated significantly better pain control immediately postoperatively7. The need for overnight hospitalization secondary to pain is decreased, as are nonsurgical operating room times.
Despite the success of regional anesthesia, a phenomenon known as "rebound pain" has been shown to occur as the original block wears off7-9. Patients with blocks will experience significantly increased pain compared to those without blocks approximately 12-24 hours after surgery. This can be controlled with early narcotic administration but can be a source of significant discomfort to a patient if not recognized and treated in time. A few studies have shown that continuous infusions of various numbing agents are efficacious in prolonged pain control, even in the ambulatory setting10-12. Nevertheless, no studies have thus performed a randomized prospective control trial studying the efficacy of continuous infusion therapy on pain control following extremity fracture surgery.
Aims
- To determine the effectiveness of continuously infused regional anesthetic for pain control in extremity fracture surgery
- To determine the effect of rebound pain on patient satisfaction of surgery Description of study and study procedure Consent All patients being treated with open reduction internal fixation for foot, ankle, tibia, elbow, forearm and wrist fractures at New York University Medical Center, NYU-Hospital for Joint Diseases will be asked to participate in this study. At the patients preoperative office visit, they will be asked to participate in the study and provided a copy of the consent form at that time which they can take home with them. All questions will be answered and they will be asked verbally if they will consent to being a part of the study. Patients will then have the opportunity to either sign the written consent forms or wait till the surgical date to think about the study and any additional questions they may have. At the time of surgery, patients will be consented for surgery. If the patient did not give written consent at the preoperative visit, they will be asked if they have any questions about the study. All questions will again be answered. They will then be asked verbally if they are willing to participate in the study, if they respond yes, then written consent will be obtained at that time.
Randomization Patients will then be randomized (using an online randomizer, similar to a flip of a coin) to one of two anesthetic protocols: regional block with single dose of anesthetic versus regional block with continuous infusion using an OnQ pump. If for some reason, the anesthesiologist feels that a patient would benefit from one type of anesthesia over another, the patient will be removed from the study and given that type of anesthesia.
Intervention Patients will be randomized to one of two anesthetic protocols: general anesthesia/sedation with a single shot, peripheral nerve block versus general anesthesia/sedation with a continuous, peripheral nerve block.
All anesthesia will be provided by an attending anesthesiologist with or without an anesthesiology resident/CRNA. Patients will have standard ASA monitors placed (pulse oximeter, blood pressure, EKG) and an intravenous line started. Sedation will be given using a combination of midazolam (1-4 mg) and fentanyl (25-100 mcg). Patients in both groups will receive an ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve block. The block will be either an infraclavicular brachial plexus block or a popliteal nerve block, depending on the location of the fracture. The appropriate region will be prepped with a chlorohexidine solution on the appropriate surgical side and the appropriate site will be visualized under ultrasound. For the group receiving a single shot block, a 22 gauge, 3.5 inch needle will be used and 20cc of 2% lidocaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine + 20 cc of 0.5% bupivacaine with 1:300,000 epinephrine will be injected around the nerve after confirming negative aspiration every 5 cc. For those receiving a continuous infusion, a 17 gauge Tuohy needle will be used and 20cc of 2% lidocaine with epinephrine + 20 cc of 0.5% bupivacaine with 1:300,000 epinephrine will be injected around the nerve after confirming negative aspiration every 5cc. Once the injection is complete, an indwelling catheter will be placed with its tip location confirmed and then secured at the skin.
After placement of the regional block, general anesthesia/sedation will be administered and maintained at the discretion of the anesthesiologist. Induction of anesthesia will involve IV propofol (2mg/kg) and fentanyl (1-2mcg/kg). Neuromuscular blockade will be used at the discretion of the anesthesiologist and will be reversed appropriately. Anesthetic maintenance will involve inhalational agents, IV agents, air, and oxygen. Fentanyl will be the only intraoperative analgesic used and will be dosed as determined by the anesthesiologist.
After completion of the surgery, patients will be taken to the PACU where those with continuous catheters will have an OnQ pump attached to it. The patient will begin receiving a continuous infusion of 0.2% ropivacaine through the catheter at a rate of 8 cc/hr. The patient will be discharged home with the catheter for 48 hours. The study participant will self-discontinue the catheter in 2 days. This involves removing the tegaderm dressing and gently pulling the catheter out from under the skin. A bandage may then be applied. Germaine Cuff, the investigators anesthesiology RN, will be available via phone to answer any questions study participants may have regarding discontinuation of the catheter. Breakthrough pain while in the PACU will be treated with IV fentanyl and PO Percocet as needed.
Postoperatively, all patients will be discharged home with a prescription for Percocet 5/325 with instructions to take 1-2 tabs every 4-6hrs as needed for pain.
Data collection Location and type of surgical procedure, duration of procedure, and duration of intravenous sedation will also be recorded. Total time in the operating room will also be noted. Time admitted to PACU, time clinically ready for discharge, time actually discharge, PACU medications for nausea/vomiting and PACU meds for pain will all be recorded prior to discharge.
Post-operative pain will be assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (0-100) prior to being discharged from PACU. Time to discharge and amount of pain medication taken in the PACU will be recorded.
Patients will be contacted 8 hours, 12 hours, 24 hours, 48 hours and 72hrs after surgery by the operative surgeon or research coordinator to assess their pain scale and pain medication intake. Patients will be seen for routine post-operative follow-up visits at two, six, twelve, twenty-four, and fifty-two weeks. At these times, patients will be assessed for pain, residual neurological symptoms, and signs of infection. Patients will also be asked if they were satisfied with their postoperative pain control. Total duration of study will be fifty-two weeks. Data collection documents will be distributed to the patients at time of surgery to assist in patient understanding.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Ankle Single Shot Block (SSB) | Active comparator | Drug: Ankle SSB |
| Ankle OnQ (Continuos Sedation OnQ Pump) | Experimental | Drug: Ankle OnQ |
| DR SSB | Experimental | Drug: DR SSB |
| DR OnQ | Experimental | Drug: DR OnQ |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 90 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Patients at least 18 years old.
- Male or Female
- All racial and ethnic groups
- Fractures and fracture/dislocations of the foot, ankle, tibia, fibula, elbow, forearm, wrist and hand
- Patients who opt for surgical treatment of their fractures.
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Patients younger than 18 years old.
- Patients who are on chronic opioids
- Patients who abuse opioids
- Patients who are unwilling to follow-up for a minimum of 52 weeks.
- Neurologic condition that could interfere with pain sensation
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Ankle SSBgeneral anesthesia/sedation with a single shot; Primary predictor variable: single shot block, a 22 gauge, 3.5 inch needle will be used and 20cc of 2% lidocaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine + 20cc of 0.5% bupivacaine with 1:300,000 epinephrine will be injected around the nerve after confirming negative aspiration every 5 cc. | Drug | Ankle Single Shot Block (SSB) |
| Ankle OnQversus regional block with continuous infusion using an OnQ pump. 17 gauge Tuohy needle will be used and 20cc of 2% lidocaine with epinephrine +20cc of 0.5% bupivacaine with1:300,000epinephrine will be injected around the nerve after confirming negative aspiration every 5cc. | Drug | Ankle OnQ (Continuos Sedation OnQ Pump) |
| DR SSBgeneral anesthesia/sedationwith a single shot; general anesthesia/sedation with a single shot; Primary predictor variable: single shot block, a 22 gauge, 3.5 inch needle will be used and 20cc of 2% lidocaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine + 20cc of 0.5% bupivacaine with 1:300,000 epinephrine will be injected around the nerve after confirming negative aspiration every 5 cc. | Drug | DR SSB |
| DR OnQversus regional block with continuous infusion using an OnQ pump. 17 gauge Tuohy needle will be used and 20cc of 2% lidocaine with epinephrine +20cc of 0.5% bupivacaine with1:300,000epinephrine will be injected around the nerve after confirming negative aspiration every 5cc. | Drug | DR OnQ |
Primary outcome
Change in Score on Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Time frame: 2 weeks, 6 weeks
The visual analog scale (VAS) is a validated, subjective measure for acute and chronic pain. Scores are recorded by making a handwritten mark on a 10-cm line that represents a continuum between 0 ("no pain") and 10 ("worst pain").
1 secondary outcome
Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Score
Time frame: 2 Weeks, 6 Weeks
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Mar 2020.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Pain
Not yet recruiting
Digital Use, 24-Hour Movement Behaviors, and Myofascial Release in University Students With Neck Pain
Forward Head Posture, Chronic Nonspecific Neck Pain
Recruiting
Effects of Virtual Reality Exergames Versus Spinal Manipulation in Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain
Chronic Nonspecific Low-back Pain, CNSLBP
Recruiting
Dietary Intervention for Migraine Relief
Migraine
RecruitingPhase 4
Anrikefon-based Patient-controlled Intravenous Analgesia Following Laparoscopic Surgery
Laparoscopic Surgery, Visceral Pain, Postoperative
Not yet recruiting
Ultrasound-Guided Radiofrequency Ablation for Focal Adenomyosis
Adenomyosis, Adenomyoma of Uterus
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Nirmal Tejwani, MD principal investigator
NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Ankle SSB, Ankle OnQ and DR SSB in people with Pain and Fracture, run by NYU Langone Health at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Mar 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 30 Mar 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in Score on Visual Analog Scale (VAS) (time frame: 2 weeks, 6 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Mar 2020; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 2 Nov 2026.