Cardiovascular DiseasesPhase 2INOBANCT02280655
Adverse Effects of Red Blood Cell Transfusions: A Unifying Hypothesis (Aim 3)
A Phase 2 study testing Storage-aged red blood cells (saRBCs) units and Fresh red blood cells units in people with Cardiovascular Diseases, run by Emory University at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Transfusion of red blood cells is often used in critically ill patients with low red blood cell counts to prevent disease progression and death. Recent studies suggest that the use of "aged" versus "fresh" red blood cells are associated with worse clinical outcomes. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Cardiovascular Diseases
- What is being tested?
- Storage-aged red blood cells (saRBCs) units and Fresh red blood cells units
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 43 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Apr 2009to Oct 2013
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Inpatient or outpatient at Emory University Hospital who's physicians have ordered a transfusion of packed red blood cells (pRBCs) of 1 or more units
- Cardiovascular risk factors (hypercholesterolemia, diabetes, hypertension, and tobacco smoking) or known cardiovascular disease) will be carefully documented for each subject
- Cardiac risk factors are defined as follows:
- Hypercholesterolemia: Defined as serum low density lipoprotein cholesterol > 140 mg/dL if not currently on lipid-lowering therapy or > 100 mg/dL if on lipid-lowering therapy
- Diabetes: Defined as having fasting blood glucose sample of > 126 mg/dL or a hemoglobin A1c of > 7% or being treated with diabetes medications such as oral hypoglycemic agents, insulin sensitizing agents, or subcutaneous insulin
- Smoking: active tobacco use, 20 cigarettes per day for the past year
- Hypertension: Blood pressure of > 140/90 or currently on anti-hypertensive medications
- Cardiovascular disease: known coronary artery disease by angiogram or documented myocardial infarction
Who cannot join
- Pregnancy
- Previous transfusion within one week.
- Inability to give informed consent
- On oral or IV nitrate therapy
- On vasopressor agents
- Active illicit drug use
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Adverse Effects of Red Blood Cell Transfusions: A Unifying Hypothesis
Transfusion of red blood cells is often used in critically ill patients with low red blood cell counts to prevent disease progression and death. Recent studies suggest that the use of "aged" versus "fresh" red blood cells are associated with worse clinical outcomes. There is evidence that red blood cells work with the cells lining our blood vessels to produce a variety of substances that normally cause arteries to relax and increase blood supply. Two of these substances are called nitric oxide (NO) and endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor (EDHF). The investigators are trying to determine the nature of these substances in human beings when they are transfused "aged" versus "fresh" red blood cells. The purpose of the study is to test the effects of transfusing "aged" versus "fresh" red blood cells in volunteers with traditional cardiovascular risk factors (high blood pressure, diabetes, high cholesterol, and tobacco use) on 1) the degree of relaxation in the arteries and subsequent changes in blood flow, 2) blood levels of oxidant molecules, 3) inflammation, and 4) stem cells.
A similar study with healthy volunteers are further described in NCT00838331.
Read the detailed description
Transfusion of red blood cells (RBCs) is often effective at preventing morbidity and mortality in anemic patients. In contrast, recent studies indicate that some RBC components may have functional defects ("RBC storage lesions") that actually cause morbidity and mortality when transfused. For example, patients transfused with RBCs stored >14 days have statistically worse outcomes than those receiving "fresher" RBC units. In addition to the age of stored RBCs, the volume transfused may be important. The Transfusion Requirements in Critical Care (TRICC) study showed that specific patients whose transfusions were limited by a restrictive trigger (RBCs transfusions only when hemoglobin [Hb] < 7 g/dL) had significantly better outcomes than those transfused with a more liberal trigger ([Hb] < 10 g/dL Hb). This finding has been particularly difficult to understand since conventional wisdom suggests that an elevated [Hb] should be beneficial because it supports increased oxygen (O2) delivery. Recipient-specific factors may also contribute to the occurrence of these adverse events. Unfortunately, these events have been difficult to investigate because up to now they have existed only as "statistical occurrences" of increased morbidity and mortality in large data sets. There are currently no clinical or laboratory methods to detect or study them in individual patients.
The microcirculation is composed of a continuum of small vessels including small arterioles, capillaries, and post-capillary venules. The microcirculation represents an actively-adjusting vascular circuit that matches blood flow (and O2 delivery) to local tissue oxygen demands. While the physiologic mechanisms that match O2 delivery to local requirements are incompletely understood, endothelium-derived nitric oxide (NO) clearly plays an important role. Interestingly, recent work has revealed that in addition to transporting O2 and carbon dioxide (CO2), the RBC also controls local NO concentrations and thus may also play a surprisingly important role in regulating blood flow in the microcirculation.
Herein, the investigators bring together previously unconnected data to propose a unifying hypothesis, centered on insufficient NO bioavailability (INOBA), to explain the increased morbidity and mortality observed in some patients following RBC transfusion. In this model, variables associated with RBC units (storage time; 2,3-diphosphoglycerate (2,3-DPG) concentration) and transfusion recipients (endothelial dysfunction; hematocrit [Hct]) collectively lead to changes in NO levels in vascular beds. Under certain circumstances, these variables are "aligned" such that NO concentrations are markedly reduced, leading to vasoconstriction, decreased local blood flow and insufficient O2 delivery to end organs. Under these circumstances, the likelihood of morbidity and mortality escalates. The INOBA hypothesis is attractive because of its explanatory power and because it leads to a number of readily testable predictions, which will be investigated t determine the effects of transfused RBCs in patients with endothelial dysfunction due to cardiovascular disease. A non-invasive ultrasound assay will be used to test whether patients with cardiovascular disease and endothelial dysfunction (who have intrinsic defects in NO synthesis) are more susceptible to adverse effects from stored/processed RBCs (impaired in NO bioavailability) than fresh RBC units. Vasodilation and tissue oxygenation in response to transfusion will be monitored, and Framingham risk scores and cardiovascular disease biomarkers will be tested as potential predictive factors to identify patients most at risk from adverse effects of RBC transfusions.
- Conditions
- Cardiovascular Diseases
- Being tested
- Storage-aged red blood cells (saRBCs) units, Fresh red blood cells units
- Keywords
- Blood Transfusions
- Medical subject headings
- Cardiovascular Diseases
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Storage-aged red blood cells (saRBCs) unitsBiological
Packed RBCs units stored for greater than 21 days, with a mean storage duration of 29.6 ± 4.9 days (mean ± SD)
Fresh red blood cells unitsBiological
Packed RBCs units stored for less than 14 days, with a mean storage duration of 9.6 ± 3.9 days (mean ± SD)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Storage-aged red blood cells (saRBCs) | Active comparator | Subjects with cardiovascular disease (CVD) received a transfusion with older stored red blood cells (RBCs) units. The units had been stored for greater than 21 days. Receives: Biological: Storage-aged red blood cells (saRBCs) units |
| Fresh red blood cells (RBCs) | Active comparator | Subjects with cardiovascular disease (CVD) received a transfusion with fresh red blood cells (RBCs) units. The units had been stored for less than 14 days. Receives: Biological: Fresh red blood cells units |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Brachial Artery Flow-mediated Dilation (FMD) After Fresh Red Blood Cells (RBCs) Transfusions vs. Storage-aged Red Blood Cells (saRBCs) Transfusions at Baseline
Ultrasonography of the brachial artery performed at the bedside using a high-resolution 10-megahertz (MHz) ultrasound transducer before and after suprasystolic inflation of a blood pressure cuff for 5 minutes in the ipsilateral upper arm. Brachial artery FMD was calculated as (hyperemic diameter - baseline diameter)/baseline diameter × 100.
Measured: Baseline
Brachial Artery Flow-mediated Dilation (FMD) After Fresh Red Blood Cells (RBCs) Transfusions vs. Storage-aged Red Blood Cells (saRBCs) Transfusions at 24 Hours After Transfusion
Ultrasonography of the brachial artery performed at the bedside using a high-resolution 10-megahertz (MHz) ultrasound transducer before and after suprasystolic inflation of a blood pressure cuff for 5 minutes in the ipsilateral upper arm. Brachial artery FMD was calculated as (hyperemic diameter -24 hour diameter)/24 hour diameter × 100.
Measured: 24 hours after transfusion
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted31 Oct 2014 (estimated)
- Study startApr 2009
- Primary completionNov 2012
- Study completionOct 2013
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Cardiovascular DiseasesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Emory UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 43 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Emory University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, John D Roback, Emory University
- Investigators
- John Roback, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Emory University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02280655
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IRB00015316a
- Acronym
- INOBA
- Status last verified
- Apr 2016
- First submitted
- 29 Oct 2014
- Last updated
- 11 Apr 2016
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 Apr 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Adverse Effects of Red Blood Cell Transfusions: A Unifying Hypothesis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02280655
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- INOBA / IRB00015316a
- Conditions
- Cardiovascular Diseases
- Keywords
- Blood Transfusions
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 43 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Emory UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Apr 2009
- Primary completion
- Nov 2012 (actual)
- Study completion
- Oct 2013 (actual)
- First posted
- 31 Oct 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 4 Dec 2014
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Transfusion of red blood cells is often used in critically ill patients with low red blood cell counts to prevent disease progression and death. Recent studies suggest that the use of "aged" versus "fresh" red blood cells are associated with worse clinical outcomes. There is evidence that red blood cells work with the cells lining our blood vessels to produce a variety of substances that normally cause arteries to relax and increase blood supply. Two of these substances are called nitric oxide (NO) and endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor (EDHF). The investigators are trying to determine the nature of these substances in human beings when they are transfused "aged" versus "fresh" red blood cells. The purpose of the study is to test the effects of transfusing "aged" versus "fresh" red blood cells in volunteers with traditional cardiovascular risk factors (high blood pressure, diabetes, high cholesterol, and tobacco use) on 1) the degree of relaxation in the arteries and subsequent changes in blood flow, 2) blood levels of oxidant molecules, 3) inflammation, and 4) stem cells.
A similar study with healthy volunteers are further described in NCT00838331.
Detailed description
Transfusion of red blood cells (RBCs) is often effective at preventing morbidity and mortality in anemic patients. In contrast, recent studies indicate that some RBC components may have functional defects ("RBC storage lesions") that actually cause morbidity and mortality when transfused. For example, patients transfused with RBCs stored >14 days have statistically worse outcomes than those receiving "fresher" RBC units. In addition to the age of stored RBCs, the volume transfused may be important. The Transfusion Requirements in Critical Care (TRICC) study showed that specific patients whose transfusions were limited by a restrictive trigger (RBCs transfusions only when hemoglobin [Hb] < 7 g/dL) had significantly better outcomes than those transfused with a more liberal trigger ([Hb] < 10 g/dL Hb). This finding has been particularly difficult to understand since conventional wisdom suggests that an elevated [Hb] should be beneficial because it supports increased oxygen (O2) delivery. Recipient-specific factors may also contribute to the occurrence of these adverse events. Unfortunately, these events have been difficult to investigate because up to now they have existed only as "statistical occurrences" of increased morbidity and mortality in large data sets. There are currently no clinical or laboratory methods to detect or study them in individual patients.
The microcirculation is composed of a continuum of small vessels including small arterioles, capillaries, and post-capillary venules. The microcirculation represents an actively-adjusting vascular circuit that matches blood flow (and O2 delivery) to local tissue oxygen demands. While the physiologic mechanisms that match O2 delivery to local requirements are incompletely understood, endothelium-derived nitric oxide (NO) clearly plays an important role. Interestingly, recent work has revealed that in addition to transporting O2 and carbon dioxide (CO2), the RBC also controls local NO concentrations and thus may also play a surprisingly important role in regulating blood flow in the microcirculation.
Herein, the investigators bring together previously unconnected data to propose a unifying hypothesis, centered on insufficient NO bioavailability (INOBA), to explain the increased morbidity and mortality observed in some patients following RBC transfusion. In this model, variables associated with RBC units (storage time; 2,3-diphosphoglycerate (2,3-DPG) concentration) and transfusion recipients (endothelial dysfunction; hematocrit [Hct]) collectively lead to changes in NO levels in vascular beds. Under certain circumstances, these variables are "aligned" such that NO concentrations are markedly reduced, leading to vasoconstriction, decreased local blood flow and insufficient O2 delivery to end organs. Under these circumstances, the likelihood of morbidity and mortality escalates. The INOBA hypothesis is attractive because of its explanatory power and because it leads to a number of readily testable predictions, which will be investigated t determine the effects of transfused RBCs in patients with endothelial dysfunction due to cardiovascular disease. A non-invasive ultrasound assay will be used to test whether patients with cardiovascular disease and endothelial dysfunction (who have intrinsic defects in NO synthesis) are more susceptible to adverse effects from stored/processed RBCs (impaired in NO bioavailability) than fresh RBC units. Vasodilation and tissue oxygenation in response to transfusion will be monitored, and Framingham risk scores and cardiovascular disease biomarkers will be tested as potential predictive factors to identify patients most at risk from adverse effects of RBC transfusions.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Storage-aged red blood cells (saRBCs) | Active comparator | Biological: Storage-aged red blood cells (saRBCs) unitsSubjects with cardiovascular disease (CVD) received a transfusion with older stored red blood cells (RBCs) units. The units had been stored for greater than 21 days. |
| Fresh red blood cells (RBCs) | Active comparator | Biological: Fresh red blood cells unitsSubjects with cardiovascular disease (CVD) received a transfusion with fresh red blood cells (RBCs) units. The units had been stored for less than 14 days. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Inpatient or outpatient at Emory University Hospital who's physicians have ordered a transfusion of packed red blood cells (pRBCs) of 1 or more units
- Cardiovascular risk factors (hypercholesterolemia, diabetes, hypertension, and tobacco smoking) or known cardiovascular disease) will be carefully documented for each subject
- Hypercholesterolemia: Defined as serum low density lipoprotein cholesterol > 140 mg/dL if not currently on lipid-lowering therapy or > 100 mg/dL if on lipid-lowering therapy
- Diabetes: Defined as having fasting blood glucose sample of > 126 mg/dL or a hemoglobin A1c of > 7% or being treated with diabetes medications such as oral hypoglycemic agents, insulin sensitizing agents, or subcutaneous insulin
- Smoking: active tobacco use, 20 cigarettes per day for the past year
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Pregnancy
- Previous transfusion within one week.
- Inability to give informed consent
- On oral or IV nitrate therapy
- On vasopressor agents
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Storage-aged red blood cells (saRBCs) unitsPacked RBCs units stored for greater than 21 days, with a mean storage duration of 29.6 ± 4.9 days (mean ± SD) | Biological | Storage-aged red blood cells (saRBCs) |
| Fresh red blood cells unitsPacked RBCs units stored for less than 14 days, with a mean storage duration of 9.6 ± 3.9 days (mean ± SD) | Biological | Fresh red blood cells (RBCs) |
Primary outcome
Brachial Artery Flow-mediated Dilation (FMD) After Fresh Red Blood Cells (RBCs) Transfusions vs. Storage-aged Red Blood Cells (saRBCs) Transfusions at Baseline
Time frame: Baseline
Ultrasonography of the brachial artery performed at the bedside using a high-resolution 10-megahertz (MHz) ultrasound transducer before and after suprasystolic inflation of a blood pressure cuff for 5 minutes in the ipsilateral upper arm. Brachial artery FMD was calculated as (hyperemic diameter - baseline diameter)/baseline diameter × 100.
Brachial Artery Flow-mediated Dilation (FMD) After Fresh Red Blood Cells (RBCs) Transfusions vs. Storage-aged Red Blood Cells (saRBCs) Transfusions at 24 Hours After Transfusion
Time frame: 24 hours after transfusion
Ultrasonography of the brachial artery performed at the bedside using a high-resolution 10-megahertz (MHz) ultrasound transducer before and after suprasystolic inflation of a blood pressure cuff for 5 minutes in the ipsilateral upper arm. Brachial artery FMD was calculated as (hyperemic diameter -24 hour diameter)/24 hour diameter × 100.
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 Apr 2016.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Cardiovascular Diseases
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Gulf Long-Term Follow-Up Study
Cardiovascular Disease, Hematologic Diseases
Active, not recruitingObservational study
The CoPenHagen PREeClampsia and cardIOvascUlar diSease Study
Pre-Eclampsia, Atherosclerosis
Recruiting
CT Stress Myocardial Perfusion, Fractional Flow Reserve and Angiography in Patients With Stable Chest Pain Syndromes
Coronary Artery Disease, Chest Syndrome
Enrolling by invitation
The DANE-HEART Trial - Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography for Primary Prevention
Coronary Atherosclerosis and Other Heart Disease, Cardiovascular Diseases
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
A Study of Inclisiran to Prevent Cardiovascular Events in High-risk Primary Prevention Patients.
Primary Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
John Roback, MD, PhD principal investigator
Emory University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Storage-aged red blood cells (saRBCs) units and Fresh red blood cells units in people with Cardiovascular Diseases, run by Emory University at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Apr 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 4 Dec 2014). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Brachial Artery Flow-mediated Dilation (FMD) After Fresh Red Blood Cells (RBCs) Transfusions vs. Storage-aged Red Blood Cells (saRBCs) Transfusions at Baseline (time frame: Baseline). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Apr 2016; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 6 Nov 2026.