DDPPhase 2STS001NCT02281006
Efficacy of Trans-tympanic Injections of a Sodium Thiosulfate Gel to Prevent Cisplatin-induced Ototoxicity
A Phase 2 study testing Trans-tympanic injection of a sodium thiosulfate gel in people with DDP and Head and Neck Cancer, run by CHU de Quebec-Universite Laval at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
This study evaluates whether a gel containing sodium thiosulfate deposited via a trans-tympanic injection on the round window of the middle ear could reduce the ototoxicity caused by the drug Cisplatin among patients with head and neck cancer treated by chemoradiation. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- DDP, Head and Neck Cancer, Adverse Effect
- What is being tested?
- Trans-tympanic injection of a sodium thiosulfate gel
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 13 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- 1 Jan 2015to 20 Jan 2017
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients with newly diagnosed locally advanced (stage III or IV) squamous cell carcinoma of the mouth, oropharynx, hypopharynx, or larynx scheduled to be treated with concomitant chemoradiation including Cisplatin100 mg/m2 3 times
- Normal otoscopic findings and symmetrical hearing
Who cannot join
- Karnofsky below 70
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Randomized Controlled Trial to Test the Efficacy of Trans-tympanic Injections of a Sodium Thiosulfate Gel to Prevent Cisplatin-induced Ototoxicity in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer
This study evaluates whether a gel containing sodium thiosulfate deposited via a trans-tympanic injection on the round window of the middle ear could reduce the ototoxicity caused by the drug Cisplatin among patients with head and neck cancer treated by chemoradiation. One ear selected randomly will be treated while the other will serve as control.
Read the detailed description
Background
Cisplatin (cis-DiammineDichloridoPlatinum, DDP) is an antineoplastic agent used in the treatment of solid malignant tumors in adults and is also a key part of treatment for many children and adolescents with cancer. However, treatment with Cisplatin carries the risk of serious dose-limiting adverse effects. Ototoxicity is of major concern since the associated hearing loss greatly impairs patients' quality of life and no preventive treatment is presently available. Cisplatin ototoxicity is an important problem for patients treated for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) who receive repeatedly high doses.
Cisplatin causes an accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in the cochlea, triggering damage to the outer hair cells of the organ of Corti. Sulfur-containing antioxidants can neutralize ROS following Cisplatin intoxication, and thus represent a potential preventive measure. A few sulfur-containing molecules have been studied. Experimental and human studies have shown that sodium thiosulfate (STS) can protect against Cisplatin-induced ototoxicity. However, when administered through the blood stream, STS interfere with Cisplatin treatment efficacy. To counter the ototoxic effects of Cisplatin treatment without impairing its efficacy, a local pharmacology approach directly aiming at the cochlea, would represent a powerful clinical strategy.
The proposed study is the first to test the efficacy of STS administered locally in the middle ear to prevent Cisplatin-induced ototoxicity in humans.
Objective
The objective of this study is to test the efficacy of trans-tympanic injections of a sodium thiosulfate-hyaluronate gel prior to cisplatin treatments to prevent cisplatin-induced ototoxicity in patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer.
The principal objective is to test the efficacy of the trans-tympanic injections of the gel at pure tone high frequencies. Exploratory analyses for secondary objectives will assess 1) cochlear damage, specifically hair cell function and 2) hearing loss at frequencies used for speech perception. Other outcomes considered are the severity of ototoxicity and the adverse effects of the trans-tympanic injections.
Methods
The proposed study is a randomized controlled trial. For each participant, one randomly selected ear will receive the treatment while the other ear will not. For ethical reasons, the control ear will not receive a placebo injection.
Participants to the trial will be recruited at the radiation therapy department of the CHU de Québec. Eligible participants are patients newly diagnosed with a locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck scheduled to be treated with concomitant chemoradiation. This treatment includes Cisplatin 100 mg/m2 on days 1, 22, and 43 after the first radiation fraction.
At the end of the first day of radiation therapy, the pharmacy department of the CHU de Québec will prepare the sodium thiosulfate hyaluronate gel by mixing 0.55 ml of a 25% solution of sodium thiosulfate pentahydrate (Seacalphyx, Drug identification number (DIN) 02386666, Seaford Pharmaceuticals Inc.) and 0.55 ml of a hyaluronate gel (Healon 10 mg, Abbott Medical Optics Inc.). After a local anesthesia of the tympanic membrane, the otologist will deposit 0.1 ml of the gel exactly on the round window of the middle ear. From there the STS should diffuse towards the cochlea. The same procedure will be repeated on the eve of the subsequent Cisplatin treatments on days 22 and 43.
To assess the effect of the trial intervention, a complete audiologic evaluation will be conducted before and one month after the end of chemoradiation therapy. The CHU de Québec audiologists will perform audiograms at frequencies ranging from 0.5 to 14 kHz. Sound intensity will be measured as dBHL(decibel hearing level). Speech reception thresholds will also be assessed. In addition, distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) recording will also be performed. Otoacoustic emissions measurements could detect hair cell damage due to Cisplatin early. The final audiologic evaluation will be conducted by an audiologist blinded to the ear assignment who would not have access to the trial and hospital records.
Adverse effects of the transtympanic injection will be documented according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0 (CTCAE). In addition, to identify unexpected adverse effects of the trial intervention on hearing, a shorter unblinded audiogram will be conducted before proceeding to the second and third transtympanic injections. Data from these audiograms will not be used in the main analysis.The follow-up for audiologic safety monitoring will be continued for one year after the end of the trial.
The principal outcome is the hearing loss defined by the difference between the average permanent threshold shift (PTS) in dB (decibel) at four pure tone high frequencies (9, 10, 12.5 and 14 kHz) using the data from the audiograms done before and after Cisplatin therapy, for each patient and for each ear. The average PTS in dB at these pure tone high frequencies will be compared between the treated and the control ears using a t-test for paired data. A planned interim analysis will be conducted when half of the anticipated participants would have completed the follow-up. In the interim analysis, the test for superiority will be done with two-sided alpha=0.01 and the results shown only to the Data and Safety Monitoring Committee (DSMC). If the DSMC recommendation is to continue the trial as planned, the final analysis will be done with two-sided alpha=0.045 in order to keep the trial overall statistical significance level to 0.05.
Exploratory analyses for secondary outcomes will assess 1) cochlear damage, specifically hair cell function obtained from the results of DPOAEs, ands 2) the difference between the PTS in dB at pure tone averages (0.5 to 8 kHz), which represent frequencies for speech perception. Other outcomes considered are ototoxicity severity according to CTCAE, and adverse effects of the transtympanic injections.
The investigators have established an independent DSMC to overview the conduct of the trial comprising experts in biostatistics, audiology, and haemato-oncology.
- Conditions
- DDP, Head and Neck Cancer, Adverse Effect
- Being tested
- Trans-tympanic injection of a sodium thiosulfate gel
- Medical subject headings
- Head and Neck Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Trans-tympanic injection of a sodium thiosulfate gelDrug
Also called Seacalphyx
A sodium thiosulfate hyaluronate gel will be prepared by mixing 0.55 ml of a 25% solution of sodium thiosulfate pentahydrate (Seacalphyx, DIN 02386666, Seaford Pharmaceuticals Inc.) and 0.55 ml of a hyaluronate gel (Healon 10 mg, Abbott Medical Optics Inc.). On the day before each Cisplatin treatment an otologist will deposit 0.1 ml of the gel exactly on the round window of the middle ear.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Treated ear | Experimental | Trans-tympanic injection of a sodium thiosulfate gel Receives: Drug: Trans-tympanic injection of a sodium thiosulfate gel |
| Control ear | No intervention | No intervention |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Hearing loss at high frequencies
Hearing loss defined by the difference between the average permanent threshold shift (PTS) in dB (decibel) at four pure tone high frequencies (9, 10, 12.5 and 14 kHz) using the data from the audiograms done before and one month after Cisplatin therapy, for each patient and for each ear.
Measured: One month after Cisplatin treatment
Secondary outcomes (3)
Cochlear damage
Cochlear damage defined by the difference between the distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) recording before and one month after Cisplatin therapy, for each patient and for each ear.
Measured: One month after Cisplatin treatment
Hearing loss at lower frequencies
Hearing loss defined by the difference between the average permanent threshold shift (PTS) in dB (decibel) at four pure tone frequencies (0.5 to 8 kHz) using the data from the audiograms done before and one month and one year after Cisplatin therapy, for each patient and for each ear.
Measured: One month and one year after Cisplatin treatment
Adverse effects of trans-tympanic injections
Ototoxicity severity according to CTCAE after each trans-tympanic injection
Measured: One month after Cisplatin treatment
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted3 Nov 2014 (estimated)
- Study start1 Jan 2015
- Primary completion20 Jan 2017
- Study completion20 Jan 2017
Why it stopped: poor accrual
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for DDPStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 13 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- CHU de Quebec-Universite Laval
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, François Meyer, CHU de Quebec-Universite Laval
- Investigators
- Francois Meyer, MD, DSc, Principal investigator, CHU de Quebec (Université Laval)
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02281006
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- A13-09-985
- Acronym
- STS001
- Status last verified
- Jan 2017
- First submitted
- 30 Oct 2014
- Last updated
- 27 Jan 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 Jan 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Randomized Controlled Trial to Test the Efficacy of Trans-tympanic Injections of a Sodium Thiosulfate Gel to Prevent Cisplatin-induced Ototoxicity in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02281006
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- STS001 / A13-09-985
- Conditions
- DDP, Head and Neck Cancer, Adverse Effect
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: poor accrual
- Enrolment
- 13 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- CHU de Quebec-Universite LavalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jan 2015 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 20 Jan 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- 20 Jan 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 3 Nov 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study evaluates whether a gel containing sodium thiosulfate deposited via a trans-tympanic injection on the round window of the middle ear could reduce the ototoxicity caused by the drug Cisplatin among patients with head and neck cancer treated by chemoradiation. One ear selected randomly will be treated while the other will serve as control.
Detailed description
Background
Cisplatin (cis-DiammineDichloridoPlatinum, DDP) is an antineoplastic agent used in the treatment of solid malignant tumors in adults and is also a key part of treatment for many children and adolescents with cancer. However, treatment with Cisplatin carries the risk of serious dose-limiting adverse effects. Ototoxicity is of major concern since the associated hearing loss greatly impairs patients' quality of life and no preventive treatment is presently available. Cisplatin ototoxicity is an important problem for patients treated for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) who receive repeatedly high doses.
Cisplatin causes an accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in the cochlea, triggering damage to the outer hair cells of the organ of Corti. Sulfur-containing antioxidants can neutralize ROS following Cisplatin intoxication, and thus represent a potential preventive measure. A few sulfur-containing molecules have been studied. Experimental and human studies have shown that sodium thiosulfate (STS) can protect against Cisplatin-induced ototoxicity. However, when administered through the blood stream, STS interfere with Cisplatin treatment efficacy. To counter the ototoxic effects of Cisplatin treatment without impairing its efficacy, a local pharmacology approach directly aiming at the cochlea, would represent a powerful clinical strategy.
The proposed study is the first to test the efficacy of STS administered locally in the middle ear to prevent Cisplatin-induced ototoxicity in humans.
Objective
The objective of this study is to test the efficacy of trans-tympanic injections of a sodium thiosulfate-hyaluronate gel prior to cisplatin treatments to prevent cisplatin-induced ototoxicity in patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer.
The principal objective is to test the efficacy of the trans-tympanic injections of the gel at pure tone high frequencies. Exploratory analyses for secondary objectives will assess 1) cochlear damage, specifically hair cell function and 2) hearing loss at frequencies used for speech perception. Other outcomes considered are the severity of ototoxicity and the adverse effects of the trans-tympanic injections.
Methods
The proposed study is a randomized controlled trial. For each participant, one randomly selected ear will receive the treatment while the other ear will not. For ethical reasons, the control ear will not receive a placebo injection.
Participants to the trial will be recruited at the radiation therapy department of the CHU de Québec. Eligible participants are patients newly diagnosed with a locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck scheduled to be treated with concomitant chemoradiation. This treatment includes Cisplatin 100 mg/m2 on days 1, 22, and 43 after the first radiation fraction.
At the end of the first day of radiation therapy, the pharmacy department of the CHU de Québec will prepare the sodium thiosulfate hyaluronate gel by mixing 0.55 ml of a 25% solution of sodium thiosulfate pentahydrate (Seacalphyx, Drug identification number (DIN) 02386666, Seaford Pharmaceuticals Inc.) and 0.55 ml of a hyaluronate gel (Healon 10 mg, Abbott Medical Optics Inc.). After a local anesthesia of the tympanic membrane, the otologist will deposit 0.1 ml of the gel exactly on the round window of the middle ear. From there the STS should diffuse towards the cochlea. The same procedure will be repeated on the eve of the subsequent Cisplatin treatments on days 22 and 43.
To assess the effect of the trial intervention, a complete audiologic evaluation will be conducted before and one month after the end of chemoradiation therapy. The CHU de Québec audiologists will perform audiograms at frequencies ranging from 0.5 to 14 kHz. Sound intensity will be measured as dBHL(decibel hearing level). Speech reception thresholds will also be assessed. In addition, distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) recording will also be performed. Otoacoustic emissions measurements could detect hair cell damage due to Cisplatin early. The final audiologic evaluation will be conducted by an audiologist blinded to the ear assignment who would not have access to the trial and hospital records.
Adverse effects of the transtympanic injection will be documented according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0 (CTCAE). In addition, to identify unexpected adverse effects of the trial intervention on hearing, a shorter unblinded audiogram will be conducted before proceeding to the second and third transtympanic injections. Data from these audiograms will not be used in the main analysis.The follow-up for audiologic safety monitoring will be continued for one year after the end of the trial.
The principal outcome is the hearing loss defined by the difference between the average permanent threshold shift (PTS) in dB (decibel) at four pure tone high frequencies (9, 10, 12.5 and 14 kHz) using the data from the audiograms done before and after Cisplatin therapy, for each patient and for each ear. The average PTS in dB at these pure tone high frequencies will be compared between the treated and the control ears using a t-test for paired data. A planned interim analysis will be conducted when half of the anticipated participants would have completed the follow-up. In the interim analysis, the test for superiority will be done with two-sided alpha=0.01 and the results shown only to the Data and Safety Monitoring Committee (DSMC). If the DSMC recommendation is to continue the trial as planned, the final analysis will be done with two-sided alpha=0.045 in order to keep the trial overall statistical significance level to 0.05.
Exploratory analyses for secondary outcomes will assess 1) cochlear damage, specifically hair cell function obtained from the results of DPOAEs, ands 2) the difference between the PTS in dB at pure tone averages (0.5 to 8 kHz), which represent frequencies for speech perception. Other outcomes considered are ototoxicity severity according to CTCAE, and adverse effects of the transtympanic injections.
The investigators have established an independent DSMC to overview the conduct of the trial comprising experts in biostatistics, audiology, and haemato-oncology.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Treated ear | Experimental | Drug: Trans-tympanic injection of a sodium thiosulfate gelTrans-tympanic injection of a sodium thiosulfate gel |
| Control ear | No intervention | –No intervention |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Patients with newly diagnosed locally advanced (stage III or IV) squamous cell carcinoma of the mouth, oropharynx, hypopharynx, or larynx scheduled to be treated with concomitant chemoradiation including Cisplatin100 mg/m2 3 times
- Normal otoscopic findings and symmetrical hearing
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Karnofsky below 70
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Trans-tympanic injection of a sodium thiosulfate gelAlso: SeacalphyxA sodium thiosulfate hyaluronate gel will be prepared by mixing 0.55 ml of a 25% solution of sodium thiosulfate pentahydrate (Seacalphyx, DIN 02386666, Seaford Pharmaceuticals Inc.) and 0.55 ml of a hyaluronate gel (Healon 10 mg, Abbott Medical Optics Inc.). On the day before each Cisplatin treatment an otologist will deposit 0.1 ml of the gel exactly on the round window of the middle ear. | Drug | Treated ear |
Primary outcome
Hearing loss at high frequencies
Time frame: One month after Cisplatin treatment
Hearing loss defined by the difference between the average permanent threshold shift (PTS) in dB (decibel) at four pure tone high frequencies (9, 10, 12.5 and 14 kHz) using the data from the audiograms done before and one month after Cisplatin therapy, for each patient and for each ear.
3 secondary outcomes
Cochlear damage
Time frame: One month after Cisplatin treatment
Hearing loss at lower frequencies
Time frame: One month and one year after Cisplatin treatment
Adverse effects of trans-tympanic injections
Time frame: One month after Cisplatin treatment
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: poor accrual). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 Jan 2017.
Related trials for DDP
RecruitingPhase 2
Radical Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy With DDP/5-FU and PD-1 Antibody for Non-metastatic Rectal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Rectal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Implementing Dyadic Developmental Psychotherapy (DDP) - Evaluation Research
Psychiatric Problem, Child Neglect
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Efficacy and Safety of Dose-dense Chemotherapy (ddEC-ddP) for Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy of HER2-negative Breast Cancer
HER2-negative Breast Cancer, Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in Patients With Locoregionally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Francois Meyer, MD, DSc principal investigator
CHU de Quebec (Université Laval)
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Trans-tympanic injection of a sodium thiosulfate gel in people with DDP and Head and Neck Cancer, run by CHU de Quebec-Universite Laval at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Jan 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: poor accrual). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Hearing loss at high frequencies (time frame: One month after Cisplatin treatment). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Jan 2017.