AzTrials
AzTrials

Abdominal Hysterectomy (& Wertheim)HYSTUBNCT02281487

Hysterectomy for Benign Gynaecological Conditions With or Without Tubectomy

A study testing Hysterectomy plus Tubectomy, Hysterectomy and light microscopy in people with Abdominal Hysterectomy (& Wertheim), run by Gynaecologisch Oncologisch Centrum Zuid at 5 sites in Netherlands.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether a tubectomy during hysterectomy for benign gynaecological conditions does not result into a premature menopause. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 36 to 55 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Abdominal Hysterectomy (& Wertheim)
What is being tested?
Hysterectomy plus Tubectomy, Hysterectomy and light microscopy
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
105 participants
Where
5 sitesNetherlands
Study dates
Jul 2014to Aug 2016
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 36 to 55 years
  • Women only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • hysterectomy (abdominally or laparoscopically) for benign indications
  • premenopausal
  • age >36 < 55

Who cannot join

  • history of cancer
  • hereditary cancer in the family
  • previous intraluminal tubal occlusion
  • previous salpingitis
  • failure to perform a tubectomy during hysterectomy

Trial locations and contacts

5 sites in 1 country.

5 sites in 1 country

Netherlands5 sites
  • Jeroen Bosch ziekenhuis

    's-Hertogenbosch, North Brabant, 5223 GZ

  • Catharina Ziekenhuis

    Eindhoven, North Brabant, 5623EJ

  • Radboudumc

    Nijmegen, Gelderland

  • Elisabeth ziekenhuis

    Tilburg, North Brabant, 5022 GC

  • TweeStedenziekenhuis

    Tilburg, North Brabant, 5042AD

Other trials in Netherlands

About this study

The purpose of this study is to determine whether a tubectomy during hysterectomy for benign gynaecological conditions does not result into a premature menopause.

Read the detailed description

RATIONALE Recent studies in women at hereditary high risk to develop ovarian cancer indicate that high grade serous carcinomas arise from (ectopic and/or dysplastic) tubal epithelium. Historically, in pre-menopausal women undergoing a hysterectomy for benign indications (such as bleeding disorders, fibroids and adenomyosis) adnexa, including the Fallopian tubes, are left in situ. However, removing the tubes during a hysterectomy potentially prevents the development of serous ovarian carcinomas. Such a simple preventive procedure should avoid serious adverse effects of adnexectomy, like premature ovarian failure (POF).

STUDY DESIGN This is a randomized controlled trial in which patients undergoing a hysterectomy for benign indications will either be included into a group in which a standard hysterectomy (abdominal or laparoscopic) will be performed or into a group in which hysterectomy (abdominal or laparoscopic) will be combined with salpingectomy.The accrual is aimed to take until July 2015 and will be performed in the regular clinical setting.

STUDY POPULATION Women undergoing hysterectomy for benign conditions (fibroids, endosalpingiosis, bleeding disorders, etc) either abdominal or laparoscopic.

SAMPLE SIZE N=50/arm

TREATMENT Hysterectomy (abdominal or laparoscopic) with or without bilateral tubectomy.

METHODS

  1. Study endpoint Main study endpoint: serum concentration Anti Mullerian Hormone (AMH) just before the operation and on average six months after the operation. Secondary study endpoint: premalignant changes within the removed Fallopian tubes from this cohort of women, defined as histological dysplastic areas detected by light microscope
  2. Randomization Randomization is performed online with Alea software.
  3. Study procedures One day preoperative, together with regular blood drawing, blood for AMH concentration assessment is drawn. The operation procedure will either be the regular procedure or the regular procedure plus removal of the Fallopian tubes by removing the tubes from the ovaries by dissection of the mesovarium. On an expected average of six months after the operation blood for serum AMH concentration assessment is drawn. Blood serum is stored at -80C and AMH concentration assessment is performed in one badge.
  4. Withdrawal of individual subjects Subjects can leave the study at any time for any reason if they wish to do so without any consequences. After withdrawal the individual subjects will be replaced.
  5. Premature termination of the study In case of serious adverse events (like postoperative haemorrhage).

SAFETY REPORTING

  1. In accordance to section 10, subsection 1, of the WMO, the investigator will inform the subjects and the reviewing accredited Medical Ethical Committee (METC) if anything occurs, on the basis of which it appears that the disadvantages of participation may be significantly greater than was foreseen in the research proposal. The study will be suspended pending further review by the accredited METC, except insofar as suspension would jeopardize the subjects' health. The investigator will take care that all subjects are kept informed.
  2. Adverse and serious adverse events All Serious Adverse Event (SAE) s will be reported to the accredited METC that approved the protocol.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Data will both be described qualitatively and quantitatively. Student t-test will be applied to study differences in hormone levels between the groups.

ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS

  1. The study will be conducted according to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki (2nd edition, 2009) and in accordance with the Medical Research Involving Human Subjects Act (WMO).
  2. Patients will be recruited at the outpatient clinic when a decision is made for hysterectomy (abdominal or laparoscopic) on benign indication. They will receive oral information from their gynecologist and an information letter will be handed out (a telephone number will be stated which patients can call for extra information). On the day of preoperative admission (mostly one day preoperative) the gynecologist will answer any remaining questions and the informed consent will be signed by both the patient and the gynecologist. Patients on oral contraceptives will stop using these at least two weeks prior to the operation.
  3. Literature on the effects of salpingectomy during hysterectomy for benign gynecological conditions on the ovarian reserve is very scant, but the one available study does not show any adverse effects. Furthermore, the chance of a postoperative hemorrhage is increased (estimated 1%). We believe that, in the light of the burden and risk, this study is justified since the prophylactic removal of the Fallopian tubes might diminish the risk of serous ovarian carcinomas (life time risk around 1%).

ADMINISTRATIVE ASPECTS AND PUBLICATION

  1. Data will be collected from the participating hospitals by one study medical doctor. Together with the principal investigator (s)he has access to the source data which are coded by a case number. The key to the code is safeguarded in the safe from the TweeSteden hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands. Data and human material will be kept for seven years (or fifteen with patient consent). Data security is assured by the fact that one medical doctor collects the data. The privacy of the participants is protected by the fact that the data is coded.
  2. The investigator will submit a summary of the progress of the trial to the accredited METC once a year. Information will be provided on the date of inclusion of the first subject, numbers of subjects included and numbers of subjects that have completed the trial, serious adverse events / serious adverse reactions, other problems, and amendments.
  3. The investigator will notify the accredited METC of the end of the study within a period of 8 weeks. The end of the study is defined as the last patient's last visit. In case the study is ended prematurely, the investigator will notify the accredited METC, including the reasons for the premature termination. Within one year after the end of the study, the investigator will submit a final study report with the results of the study, including any publications/abstracts of the study, to the accredited METC.
  4. The data will be published in peer reviewed medical journals as well as presented in abstracts at medical conferences.
Being tested
Hysterectomy plus Tubectomy, Hysterectomy, light microscopy
Keywords
tubal carcinoma, ovarian carcinoma, tubectomy, hysterectomy, dysplastic changes, Anti Mullerian Hormone, Tubal Intraepithelial Carcinoma, Salpingectomy
Medical subject headings
Ovarian Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Hysterectomy plus TubectomyProcedure or surgery

    hysterectomy with tubectomy

  • HysterectomyProcedure or surgery

    standard hysterectomy

  • light microscopyDevice

    analysis of the incidence of dysplastic lesions (defined as: nuclear atypia, pilling of epithelial cells, multiple mitosis), if any, in the removed Fallopian tubes by light microscopy (Leica DM4000)

Study groups in NCT02281487
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
HysterectomyActive comparatorstandard hysterectomy
Receives: Procedure: Hysterectomy
Hysterectomy plus tubectomyExperimentalHysterectomy plus tubectomy
Receives: Procedure: Hysterectomy plus Tubectomy; Device: light microscopy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Anti Mullerian Hormone

    Difference, if any, in concentration of Anti Mullerian Hormone one day prior to hysterectomy and on average around six months after surgery between the study groups (hysterectomy alone versus hysterectomy and tubectomy).

    Measured: at baseline and on average six months after the operation

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Dysplasia

    Analysis of the incidence of dysplastic lesions (defined as: nuclear atypia, pilling of epithelial cells, multiple mitosis), if any, in the removed Fallopian tubes by light microscopy.

    Measured: on average six months after the operation

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted3 Nov 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study startJul 2014
  3. Primary completionApr 2016
  4. Study completionAug 2016

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
105 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02281487
Sponsor's protocol ID
HYSTUB
Other IDs
NL39317.028.12
Acronym
HYSTUB
Status last verified
May 2017
First submitted
1 Jul 2014
Last updated
30 May 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Piek JM, van Diest PJ, Zweemer RP, Kenemans P, Verheijen RH. Tubal ligation and risk of ovarian cancer. Lancet. 2001 Sep 8;358(9284):844. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)05992-X. No abstract available.

    PubMed 11570411
  • Kurman RJ, Shih IeM. The origin and pathogenesis of epithelial ovarian cancer: a proposed unifying theory. Am J Surg Pathol. 2010 Mar;34(3):433-43. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e3181cf3d79.

    PubMed 20154587
  • Crum CP. Intercepting pelvic cancer in the distal fallopian tube: theories and realities. Mol Oncol. 2009 Apr;3(2):165-70. doi: 10.1016/j.molonc.2009.01.004. Epub 2009 Feb 3.

    PubMed 19383378
  • Sezik M, Ozkaya O, Demir F, Sezik HT, Kaya H. Total salpingectomy during abdominal hysterectomy: effects on ovarian reserve and ovarian stromal blood flow. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2007 Dec;33(6):863-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2007.00669.x.

    PubMed 18001455
  • Narod SA, Sun P, Ghadirian P, Lynch H, Isaacs C, Garber J, Weber B, Karlan B, Fishman D, Rosen B, Tung N, Neuhausen SL. Tubal ligation and risk of ovarian cancer in carriers of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations: a case-control study. Lancet. 2001 May 12;357(9267):1467-70. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(00)04642-0.

    PubMed 11377596

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Hysterectomy plus Tubectomy, Hysterectomy and light microscopy in people with Abdominal Hysterectomy (& Wertheim), run by Gynaecologisch Oncologisch Centrum Zuid at 5 sites in Netherlands.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 May 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 5 sites in Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Anti Mullerian Hormone (time frame: at baseline and on average six months after the operation). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02281487, which also lists 5 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 May 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in