AzTrials
AzTrials

EndometriosisNCT02282943

Carbon Dioxide-laser Versus Harmonic Scalpel in the Treatment of Pelvic Pain Due to Endometriosis

A study testing Laser and Harmonic scalpel in people with Endometriosis, run by Mr Andrew Kent.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to compare laser CO2 ablation/excision of Endometriosis (AFS stages 1-3) with excision of endometriosis using the Ethicon Harmonic ACE device. Pain scores at 6 months was the primary outcome, but secondary outcomes assessed pain scores at 1, 3 and 5 years as well as psychological state and… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Endometriosis
What is being tested?
Laser and Harmonic scalpel
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
112 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Oct 2002to Jun 2016
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • Women only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Endometriosis grade I-III by revised American Fertility Society Scoring
  • Patients in whom laser treatment to the endometriosis is considered the treatment of choice.
  • Patients having consented to participated in the trial
  • Patient is 18 years old or greater
  • Patients who have no contraindications to either of the treatment modalities proposed

Who cannot join

  • Patients who do not wish to participate/have not signed the informed consent form
  • Pregnancy of breast feeding
  • Patients who are unable or unwilling to discontinue hormonal treatment for 6 months
  • Patients who have received additional treatment for their endometriosis within 6 months of surgery
  • Patients with documented painful conditions of the gastrointestinal or urinary system

About this study

The purpose of this study is to compare laser CO2 ablation/excision of Endometriosis (AFS stages 1-3) with excision of endometriosis using the Ethicon Harmonic ACE device. Pain scores at 6 months was the primary outcome, but secondary outcomes assessed pain scores at 1, 3 and 5 years as well as psychological state and quality of life.

Conditions
Endometriosis
Being tested
Laser, Harmonic scalpel
Keywords
endometriosis, CO2 laser vapourisation, Harmonic scalpel, AFS stage I-III
Medical subject headings
Endometriosis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • LaserDevice

    Vapourisation/excision of endometriosis AFS stages I-III using CO2 laser

  • Harmonic scalpelDevice

    Excision of endometriosis using Harmonic scalpel

Study groups in NCT02282943
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
LaserActive comparatorvapourisation/excision of endometriosis using CO2 laser
Receives: Device: Laser
Harmonic scalpelExperimentalexcision of endometriosis using Harmonic scalpel
Receives: Device: Harmonic scalpel

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Visual analogue pain score (VAS) change at 6 months compared to preoperative baseline

    Measured: 6 months

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Quality of life survey (Endometriosis Health Profile Questionnaire)

    Measured: 0, 3, 6 months and 1,3,5 years

  2. Psychological state

    Hospital Anxiety \& Depression Scale

    Measured: 0, 3 ,6 months and 1,3,5 years

  3. Visual analogue pain score (VAS) change from baseline

    Measured: 1,3 and 5 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted5 Nov 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study startOct 2002
  3. Primary completionDec 2011
  4. Study completionJun 2016

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
112 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02282943
Sponsor's protocol ID
EC71/02
Status last verified
Mar 2019
First submitted
30 Oct 2014
Last updated
26 Mar 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Laser and Harmonic scalpel in people with Endometriosis, run by Mr Andrew Kent.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Mar 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Visual analogue pain score (VAS) change at 6 months compared to preoperative baseline (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Mar 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in