AzTrials
AzTrials

Stroke and Healthy SubjectsPAS-strokeNCT02284087

Paired Associative Stimulation in Post-stroke Hand Motor Deficits

An observational study of Stroke and Healthy Subjects, run by Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, France at 1 site in France.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Introduction The motor impairment of the upper extremity is the most common sequelae after ischemic stroke. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a promising non- invasive technique in the rehabilitation of motor deficits. However, its effect in post-stroke motor deficits remains moderate our days. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 85 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Stroke and Healthy Subjects
What is being tested?
PAS
Type of treatment
Medical device
How many people
81 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
26 Jan 2015to 7 Nov 2018
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 85 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Stroke patients

Who may be able to join

  • First event ischemic stroke with hand motor deficit
  • Time since stroke > 30 days
  • Stroke lesion sparing the primary motor cortex (hand knob area)
  • Age between 18 and 85 ans
  • Age between 18 and 85
  • Right handed

Who cannot join

  • No homonymous hemianopia
  • No contra-indications for TMS and MRI
  • Pregnancy
  • Epilepsia
  • Any pathology that threatened the 1 month follow up
  • No contra-indications for TMS and MRI
  • Pregnancy
  • Any cerebral pathology or pathology that threatened the 1 month follow up

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

France1 site
  • ICM, CIC Neurosciences

    Paris, 75013

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: Assessment of Paired Associative Stimulation Protocols Using Cerebellar or Visual Afferences in Post-stroke Hand Motor Deficits

Introduction The motor impairment of the upper extremity is the most common sequelae after ischemic stroke. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a promising non- invasive technique in the rehabilitation of motor deficits. However, its effect in post-stroke motor deficits remains moderate our days. To potentiate the effect of TMS, techniques called Paired Associative Stimulations (PAS) involving the integration of afferent sensory inputs at the level of the ipsilesional primary motor cortex were developed in healthy subjects. PAS techniques have shown a gain of corticospinal excitability by such phenomenon known as long Term Potentiation (LTP) and a gain of motor performance. The investigators would like to propose to evaluate two types of these techniques with a volley of visual afferents (visuomotor stimulation, V_PAS) or of cerebellar afferents (CER_PAS), because these two structures convey important information in the execution of the movement.

Design Multicenter, randomized, study, 60 patients in 3 parallel groups (V_PAS, CER_PAS, control group with sham and sham V_PAS CER_PAS), 5 days of treatment, clinical assessment, electrophysiological and MRI before, immediately post- and second post-assessments (4 weeks).

Read more

A group of 24 healthy subjects will undergo a parallel physiopathological study on the underlying mechanisms of cerebellar PAS

Objectives Main objective: To determine whether (and how) Paired Associative Stimulation technique (PAS) induces cerebral reorganization in the primary motor cortex compared to the control group.

Aim 2: Determine whether (and which) type of PAS is capable of inducing changes in motor performance of the upper limb paresis and duration Aim 3: Determine whether (and which) type of PAS is capable of inducing changes in excitability of the corticospinal tract and duration Aim 4: Determine how PAS techniques modify the functional connectivity during movement Aim 5: Determine if connectivity changes during induced movement correlate with clinical improvements Aim 6: Determine whether patients who benefit of a type of PAS have specific anatomical lesion characteristics (volume, afferent and efferent white matter fasciculi integrity)

Read the detailed description

Introduction The motor impairment of the upper extremity is the most common sequelae after ischemic stroke. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a promising non- invasive technique in the rehabilitation of motor deficits. However, its effect in post-stroke motor deficits remains moderate the investigators days. To potentiate the effect of TMS, techniques called Paired Associative Stimulations (PAS) involving the integration of afferent sensory inputs at the level of the ipsilesional primary motor cortex were developed in healthy subjects. PAS techniques have shown a gain of corticospinal excitability by such phenomenon known as long Term Potentiation (LTP) and a gain of motor performance. The investigators would like to propose to evaluate two types of these techniques with a volley of visual afferents (visuomotor stimulation, V_PAS) or of cerebellar afferents (CER_PAS), because these two structures convey important information in the execution of the movement.

Design Multicenter, randomized study, 60 patients in 3 parallel groups (V_PAS, CER_PAS, control group with sham and sham V_PAS CER_PAS), 5 days of treatment, clinical assessment, electrophysiological and MRI before, immediately post- and second post-assessments (4 weeks).

A group of 24 healthy subjects will undergo a parallel physiopathological study on the underlying mechanisms of cerebellar PAS Objectives Main objective: To determine whether (and how) Paired Associative Stimulation technique (PAS) induces cerebral reorganization in the primary motor cortex compared to the control group.

Aim 2: Determine whether (and which) type of PAS is capable of inducing changes in motor performance of the upper limb paresis and duration Aim 3: Determine whether (and which) type of PAS is capable of inducing changes in excitability of the corticospinal tract and duration Aim 4: Determine how PAS techniques modify the functional connectivity during movement Aim 5: Determine if connectivity changes during induced movement correlate with clinical improvements Aim 6: Determine whether patients who benefit of a type of PAS have specific anatomical lesion characteristics (volume, afferent and efferent white matter fasciculi integrity) Aim 7: for healthy subjects: determine the TMS parameters that will influence the response to cerebellar PAS protocols

Hypotheses

  • The sensorimotor stimulation approach (V_PAS or CER_PAS) improves motor function of the hand compared to the control group. The CER_PAS approach may be more effective than V_PAS as the cerebellum plays a major role in the post-stroke recovery
  • This improvement would be explained by an effect on brain reorganization by increasing the proportion of activation in the ipsilesional primary motor cortex comparing to the contralesional side, as well as strengthening the relationships between ipsilesional premotor and motor cortices.
  • Clinical and electrophysiological effects observed in the combined approach are correlated with specific characteristics of the sensorimotor network assessed by MRI.

Perspectives Demonstrating beneficial effects would subsequently consider protocols in order to achieve a therapeutic effect in the long term. The low cost greatly facilitates the implementation of feasible treatments in routine care in specialized centers (or pilot research centers) and potentially useful in many patients. The study of the characteristics of responders and non-responders patients would provide "patient-oriented" treatment, which take into account the particularities of each subject.

Being tested
PAS
Keywords
transcranial magnetic stimulation, movement disorders
Medical subject headings
Stroke, Movement Disorders

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • PASDevice

Study groups in NCT02284087
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
V_PASVisuomotor paired associative stimulation protocol
Receives: Device: PAS
Sham V_PASPlacebo group of Visuomotor paired associative stimulation protocol
CER_PAScerebellar-motor associative stimulation protocol
Receives: Device: PAS
Sham CER_PASPlacebo group of cerebellar-motor associative stimulation protocol

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. change in lateralization indices in the primary motor cortex using functional magnetic Resonance

    Measured: Change from Baseline to day 5 (Pre and post intervention)

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. change in motor score of the affected hand by the Jebsen Taylor Test

    Measured: Change from Baseline to day 5 (Pre and post intervention)

  2. change in corticospinal excitability by the motor evoked potentials

    Measured: Change from Baseline to day 5 (Pre and post intervention)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted5 Nov 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study start26 Jan 2015
  3. Primary completion7 Nov 2018
  4. Study completion7 Nov 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
81 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02284087
Sponsor's protocol ID
C14-38
Other IDs
2014-A01165-42
Acronym
PAS-stroke
Status last verified
Mar 2025
First submitted
21 Oct 2014
Last updated
10 Dec 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Rosso C, Moulton EJ, Kemlin C, Leder S, Corvol JC, Mehdi S, Obadia MA, Obadia M, Yger M, Meseguer E, Perlbarg V, Valabregue R, Magno S, Lindberg P, Meunier S, Lamy JC. Cerebello-Motor Paired Associative Stimulation and Motor Recovery in Stroke: a Randomized, Sham-Controlled, Double-Blind Pilot Trial. Neurotherapeutics. 2022 Mar;19(2):491-500. doi: 10.1007/s13311-022-01205-y. Epub 2022 Feb 28.

    PubMed 35226342
  • Kemlin C, Moulton E, Leder S, Houot M, Meunier S, Rosso C, Lamy JC. Redundancy Among Parameters Describing the Input-Output Relation of Motor Evoked Potentials in Healthy Subjects and Stroke Patients. Front Neurol. 2019 May 21;10:535. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00535. eCollection 2019.

    PubMed 31178817
  • Rosso C, Perlbarg V, Valabregue R, Obadia M, Kemlin-Mechin C, Moulton E, Leder S, Meunier S, Lamy JC. Anatomical and functional correlates of cortical motor threshold of the dominant hand. Brain Stimul. 2017 Sep-Oct;10(5):952-958. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2017.05.005. Epub 2017 May 17.

    PubMed 28551318
  • Rosso C, Lamy JC. Does Resting Motor Threshold Predict Motor Hand Recovery After Stroke? Front Neurol. 2018 Nov 29;9:1020. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2018.01020. eCollection 2018.

    PubMed 30555404

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Stroke and Healthy Subjects, run by Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, France at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Dec 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

change in lateralization indices in the primary motor cortex using functional magnetic Resonance (time frame: Change from Baseline to day 5 (Pre and post intervention)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02284087, which also lists 4 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Dec 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in