Stroke and Healthy SubjectsPAS-strokeNCT02284087
Paired Associative Stimulation in Post-stroke Hand Motor Deficits
An observational study of Stroke and Healthy Subjects, run by Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, France at 1 site in France.
Trial summary
Introduction The motor impairment of the upper extremity is the most common sequelae after ischemic stroke. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a promising non- invasive technique in the rehabilitation of motor deficits. However, its effect in post-stroke motor deficits remains moderate our days. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 85 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Stroke and Healthy Subjects
- What is being tested?
- PAS
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- How many people
- 81 participants
- Where
- 1 siteFrance
- Study dates
- 26 Jan 2015to 7 Nov 2018
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 85 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Stroke patients
Who may be able to join
- First event ischemic stroke with hand motor deficit
- Time since stroke > 30 days
- Stroke lesion sparing the primary motor cortex (hand knob area)
- Age between 18 and 85 ans
- Age between 18 and 85
- Right handed
Who cannot join
- No homonymous hemianopia
- No contra-indications for TMS and MRI
- Pregnancy
- Epilepsia
- Any pathology that threatened the 1 month follow up
- No contra-indications for TMS and MRI
- Pregnancy
- Any cerebral pathology or pathology that threatened the 1 month follow up
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Assessment of Paired Associative Stimulation Protocols Using Cerebellar or Visual Afferences in Post-stroke Hand Motor Deficits
Introduction The motor impairment of the upper extremity is the most common sequelae after ischemic stroke. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a promising non- invasive technique in the rehabilitation of motor deficits. However, its effect in post-stroke motor deficits remains moderate our days. To potentiate the effect of TMS, techniques called Paired Associative Stimulations (PAS) involving the integration of afferent sensory inputs at the level of the ipsilesional primary motor cortex were developed in healthy subjects. PAS techniques have shown a gain of corticospinal excitability by such phenomenon known as long Term Potentiation (LTP) and a gain of motor performance. The investigators would like to propose to evaluate two types of these techniques with a volley of visual afferents (visuomotor stimulation, V_PAS) or of cerebellar afferents (CER_PAS), because these two structures convey important information in the execution of the movement.
Design Multicenter, randomized, study, 60 patients in 3 parallel groups (V_PAS, CER_PAS, control group with sham and sham V_PAS CER_PAS), 5 days of treatment, clinical assessment, electrophysiological and MRI before, immediately post- and second post-assessments (4 weeks).
Read more
A group of 24 healthy subjects will undergo a parallel physiopathological study on the underlying mechanisms of cerebellar PAS
Objectives Main objective: To determine whether (and how) Paired Associative Stimulation technique (PAS) induces cerebral reorganization in the primary motor cortex compared to the control group.
Aim 2: Determine whether (and which) type of PAS is capable of inducing changes in motor performance of the upper limb paresis and duration Aim 3: Determine whether (and which) type of PAS is capable of inducing changes in excitability of the corticospinal tract and duration Aim 4: Determine how PAS techniques modify the functional connectivity during movement Aim 5: Determine if connectivity changes during induced movement correlate with clinical improvements Aim 6: Determine whether patients who benefit of a type of PAS have specific anatomical lesion characteristics (volume, afferent and efferent white matter fasciculi integrity)
Read the detailed description
Introduction The motor impairment of the upper extremity is the most common sequelae after ischemic stroke. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a promising non- invasive technique in the rehabilitation of motor deficits. However, its effect in post-stroke motor deficits remains moderate the investigators days. To potentiate the effect of TMS, techniques called Paired Associative Stimulations (PAS) involving the integration of afferent sensory inputs at the level of the ipsilesional primary motor cortex were developed in healthy subjects. PAS techniques have shown a gain of corticospinal excitability by such phenomenon known as long Term Potentiation (LTP) and a gain of motor performance. The investigators would like to propose to evaluate two types of these techniques with a volley of visual afferents (visuomotor stimulation, V_PAS) or of cerebellar afferents (CER_PAS), because these two structures convey important information in the execution of the movement.
Design Multicenter, randomized study, 60 patients in 3 parallel groups (V_PAS, CER_PAS, control group with sham and sham V_PAS CER_PAS), 5 days of treatment, clinical assessment, electrophysiological and MRI before, immediately post- and second post-assessments (4 weeks).
A group of 24 healthy subjects will undergo a parallel physiopathological study on the underlying mechanisms of cerebellar PAS Objectives Main objective: To determine whether (and how) Paired Associative Stimulation technique (PAS) induces cerebral reorganization in the primary motor cortex compared to the control group.
Aim 2: Determine whether (and which) type of PAS is capable of inducing changes in motor performance of the upper limb paresis and duration Aim 3: Determine whether (and which) type of PAS is capable of inducing changes in excitability of the corticospinal tract and duration Aim 4: Determine how PAS techniques modify the functional connectivity during movement Aim 5: Determine if connectivity changes during induced movement correlate with clinical improvements Aim 6: Determine whether patients who benefit of a type of PAS have specific anatomical lesion characteristics (volume, afferent and efferent white matter fasciculi integrity) Aim 7: for healthy subjects: determine the TMS parameters that will influence the response to cerebellar PAS protocols
Hypotheses
- The sensorimotor stimulation approach (V_PAS or CER_PAS) improves motor function of the hand compared to the control group. The CER_PAS approach may be more effective than V_PAS as the cerebellum plays a major role in the post-stroke recovery
- This improvement would be explained by an effect on brain reorganization by increasing the proportion of activation in the ipsilesional primary motor cortex comparing to the contralesional side, as well as strengthening the relationships between ipsilesional premotor and motor cortices.
- Clinical and electrophysiological effects observed in the combined approach are correlated with specific characteristics of the sensorimotor network assessed by MRI.
Perspectives Demonstrating beneficial effects would subsequently consider protocols in order to achieve a therapeutic effect in the long term. The low cost greatly facilitates the implementation of feasible treatments in routine care in specialized centers (or pilot research centers) and potentially useful in many patients. The study of the characteristics of responders and non-responders patients would provide "patient-oriented" treatment, which take into account the particularities of each subject.
- Conditions
- Stroke and Healthy Subjects
- Being tested
- PAS
- Keywords
- transcranial magnetic stimulation, movement disorders
- Medical subject headings
- Stroke, Movement Disorders
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
PASDevice
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| V_PAS | Visuomotor paired associative stimulation protocol Receives: Device: PAS | |
| Sham V_PAS | Placebo group of Visuomotor paired associative stimulation protocol | |
| CER_PAS | cerebellar-motor associative stimulation protocol Receives: Device: PAS | |
| Sham CER_PAS | Placebo group of cerebellar-motor associative stimulation protocol |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
change in lateralization indices in the primary motor cortex using functional magnetic Resonance
Measured: Change from Baseline to day 5 (Pre and post intervention)
Secondary outcomes (2)
change in motor score of the affected hand by the Jebsen Taylor Test
Measured: Change from Baseline to day 5 (Pre and post intervention)
change in corticospinal excitability by the motor evoked potentials
Measured: Change from Baseline to day 5 (Pre and post intervention)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 Nov 2014 (estimated)
- Study start26 Jan 2015
- Primary completion7 Nov 2018
- Study completion7 Nov 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Stroke and Healthy SubjectsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, FranceThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 81 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Sponsor type
- Other government
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Charlotte ROSSO, PI, Principal investigator, Brain and Spine institute, INSERM UMR 1127, CNRS 7225
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02284087
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- C14-38
- Other IDs
- 2014-A01165-42
- Acronym
- PAS-stroke
- Status last verified
- Mar 2025
- First submitted
- 21 Oct 2014
- Last updated
- 10 Dec 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Rosso C, Moulton EJ, Kemlin C, Leder S, Corvol JC, Mehdi S, Obadia MA, Obadia M, Yger M, Meseguer E, Perlbarg V, Valabregue R, Magno S, Lindberg P, Meunier S, Lamy JC. Cerebello-Motor Paired Associative Stimulation and Motor Recovery in Stroke: a Randomized, Sham-Controlled, Double-Blind Pilot Trial. Neurotherapeutics. 2022 Mar;19(2):491-500. doi: 10.1007/s13311-022-01205-y. Epub 2022 Feb 28.
PubMed 35226342Kemlin C, Moulton E, Leder S, Houot M, Meunier S, Rosso C, Lamy JC. Redundancy Among Parameters Describing the Input-Output Relation of Motor Evoked Potentials in Healthy Subjects and Stroke Patients. Front Neurol. 2019 May 21;10:535. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00535. eCollection 2019.
PubMed 31178817Rosso C, Perlbarg V, Valabregue R, Obadia M, Kemlin-Mechin C, Moulton E, Leder S, Meunier S, Lamy JC. Anatomical and functional correlates of cortical motor threshold of the dominant hand. Brain Stimul. 2017 Sep-Oct;10(5):952-958. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2017.05.005. Epub 2017 May 17.
PubMed 28551318Rosso C, Lamy JC. Does Resting Motor Threshold Predict Motor Hand Recovery After Stroke? Front Neurol. 2018 Nov 29;9:1020. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2018.01020. eCollection 2018.
PubMed 30555404
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Dec 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Assessment of Paired Associative Stimulation Protocols Using Cerebellar or Visual Afferences in Post-stroke Hand Motor Deficits
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02284087
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PAS-stroke / C14-38
- Conditions
- Stroke and Healthy Subjects
- Keywords
- transcranial magnetic stimulation, movement disorders
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 81 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, FranceOther government
- Study start
- 26 Jan 2015 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 7 Nov 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 7 Nov 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 5 Nov 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Introduction The motor impairment of the upper extremity is the most common sequelae after ischemic stroke. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a promising non- invasive technique in the rehabilitation of motor deficits. However, its effect in post-stroke motor deficits remains moderate our days. To potentiate the effect of TMS, techniques called Paired Associative Stimulations (PAS) involving the integration of afferent sensory inputs at the level of the ipsilesional primary motor cortex were developed in healthy subjects. PAS techniques have shown a gain of corticospinal excitability by such phenomenon known as long Term Potentiation (LTP) and a gain of motor performance. The investigators would like to propose to evaluate two types of these techniques with a volley of visual afferents (visuomotor stimulation, V_PAS) or of cerebellar afferents (CER_PAS), because these two structures convey important information in the execution of the movement.
Design Multicenter, randomized, study, 60 patients in 3 parallel groups (V_PAS, CER_PAS, control group with sham and sham V_PAS CER_PAS), 5 days of treatment, clinical assessment, electrophysiological and MRI before, immediately post- and second post-assessments (4 weeks).
A group of 24 healthy subjects will undergo a parallel physiopathological study on the underlying mechanisms of cerebellar PAS
Objectives Main objective: To determine whether (and how) Paired Associative Stimulation technique (PAS) induces cerebral reorganization in the primary motor cortex compared to the control group.
Aim 2: Determine whether (and which) type of PAS is capable of inducing changes in motor performance of the upper limb paresis and duration Aim 3: Determine whether (and which) type of PAS is capable of inducing changes in excitability of the corticospinal tract and duration Aim 4: Determine how PAS techniques modify the functional connectivity during movement Aim 5: Determine if connectivity changes during induced movement correlate with clinical improvements Aim 6: Determine whether patients who benefit of a type of PAS have specific anatomical lesion characteristics (volume, afferent and efferent white matter fasciculi integrity)
Detailed description
Introduction The motor impairment of the upper extremity is the most common sequelae after ischemic stroke. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a promising non- invasive technique in the rehabilitation of motor deficits. However, its effect in post-stroke motor deficits remains moderate the investigators days. To potentiate the effect of TMS, techniques called Paired Associative Stimulations (PAS) involving the integration of afferent sensory inputs at the level of the ipsilesional primary motor cortex were developed in healthy subjects. PAS techniques have shown a gain of corticospinal excitability by such phenomenon known as long Term Potentiation (LTP) and a gain of motor performance. The investigators would like to propose to evaluate two types of these techniques with a volley of visual afferents (visuomotor stimulation, V_PAS) or of cerebellar afferents (CER_PAS), because these two structures convey important information in the execution of the movement.
Design Multicenter, randomized study, 60 patients in 3 parallel groups (V_PAS, CER_PAS, control group with sham and sham V_PAS CER_PAS), 5 days of treatment, clinical assessment, electrophysiological and MRI before, immediately post- and second post-assessments (4 weeks).
A group of 24 healthy subjects will undergo a parallel physiopathological study on the underlying mechanisms of cerebellar PAS Objectives Main objective: To determine whether (and how) Paired Associative Stimulation technique (PAS) induces cerebral reorganization in the primary motor cortex compared to the control group.
Aim 2: Determine whether (and which) type of PAS is capable of inducing changes in motor performance of the upper limb paresis and duration Aim 3: Determine whether (and which) type of PAS is capable of inducing changes in excitability of the corticospinal tract and duration Aim 4: Determine how PAS techniques modify the functional connectivity during movement Aim 5: Determine if connectivity changes during induced movement correlate with clinical improvements Aim 6: Determine whether patients who benefit of a type of PAS have specific anatomical lesion characteristics (volume, afferent and efferent white matter fasciculi integrity) Aim 7: for healthy subjects: determine the TMS parameters that will influence the response to cerebellar PAS protocols
Hypotheses
- The sensorimotor stimulation approach (V_PAS or CER_PAS) improves motor function of the hand compared to the control group. The CER_PAS approach may be more effective than V_PAS as the cerebellum plays a major role in the post-stroke recovery
- This improvement would be explained by an effect on brain reorganization by increasing the proportion of activation in the ipsilesional primary motor cortex comparing to the contralesional side, as well as strengthening the relationships between ipsilesional premotor and motor cortices.
- Clinical and electrophysiological effects observed in the combined approach are correlated with specific characteristics of the sensorimotor network assessed by MRI.
Perspectives Demonstrating beneficial effects would subsequently consider protocols in order to achieve a therapeutic effect in the long term. The low cost greatly facilitates the implementation of feasible treatments in routine care in specialized centers (or pilot research centers) and potentially useful in many patients. The study of the characteristics of responders and non-responders patients would provide "patient-oriented" treatment, which take into account the particularities of each subject.
Study design
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| V_PAS | – | Device: PASVisuomotor paired associative stimulation protocol |
| Sham V_PAS | – | –Placebo group of Visuomotor paired associative stimulation protocol |
| CER_PAS | – | Device: PAScerebellar-motor associative stimulation protocol |
| Sham CER_PAS | – | –Placebo group of cerebellar-motor associative stimulation protocol |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 85 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Stroke patients
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- First event ischemic stroke with hand motor deficit
- Time since stroke > 30 days
- Stroke lesion sparing the primary motor cortex (hand knob area)
- Age between 18 and 85 ans
- Age between 18 and 85
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- No homonymous hemianopia
- No contra-indications for TMS and MRI
- Pregnancy
- Epilepsia
- Any pathology that threatened the 1 month follow up
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| PAS | Device | CER_PAS, V_PAS |
Primary outcome
change in lateralization indices in the primary motor cortex using functional magnetic Resonance
Time frame: Change from Baseline to day 5 (Pre and post intervention)
2 secondary outcomes
change in motor score of the affected hand by the Jebsen Taylor Test
Time frame: Change from Baseline to day 5 (Pre and post intervention)
change in corticospinal excitability by the motor evoked potentials
Time frame: Change from Baseline to day 5 (Pre and post intervention)
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Dec 2025.
- Results publication: PubMed 35226342Rosso C, Moulton EJ, Kemlin C, Leder S, Corvol JC, Mehdi S, Obadia MA, Obadia M, Yger M, Meseguer E, Perlbarg V, Valabregue R, Magno S, Lindberg P, Meunier S, Lamy JC. Cerebello-Motor Paired Associative Stimulation and Motor Recovery in Stroke: a Randomized, Sham-Controlled, Double-Blind Pilot Trial. Neurotherapeutics. 2022 Mar;19(2):491-500. doi: 10.1007/s13311-022-01205-y. Epub 2022 Feb 28.
- Results publication: PubMed 31178817Kemlin C, Moulton E, Leder S, Houot M, Meunier S, Rosso C, Lamy JC. Redundancy Among Parameters Describing the Input-Output Relation of Motor Evoked Potentials in Healthy Subjects and Stroke Patients. Front Neurol. 2019 May 21;10:535. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00535. eCollection 2019.
- Results publication: PubMed 28551318Rosso C, Perlbarg V, Valabregue R, Obadia M, Kemlin-Mechin C, Moulton E, Leder S, Meunier S, Lamy JC. Anatomical and functional correlates of cortical motor threshold of the dominant hand. Brain Stimul. 2017 Sep-Oct;10(5):952-958. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2017.05.005. Epub 2017 May 17.
- Results publication: PubMed 30555404Rosso C, Lamy JC. Does Resting Motor Threshold Predict Motor Hand Recovery After Stroke? Front Neurol. 2018 Nov 29;9:1020. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2018.01020. eCollection 2018.
Related trials for Stroke and Healthy Subjects
RecruitingPhase 1
The Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics Study of Evategrel CG-0255 Besylate)and Plavix® in Healthy Participants
Acute Coronary Syndromes (ACS), Recent Myocardial Infarction
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of LWP779 in Healthy Participants
Ischemic Stroke
RecruitingEarly Phase 1
Chronic Transcutaneous Stimulation to Promote Motor Function and Recovery in Individuals With Paralysis or Paresis
Healthy Volunteers, Spinal Cord Injury
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Brain Health Registry: An Online Registry to Identify and Assess Subjects for Brain Research
Healthy, Neurodegenerative Disease
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Prefrontal Brain Activity and ECG Patterns in Stroke and Healthy Adults
Stroke, Healthy Participants
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Charlotte ROSSO, PI principal investigator
Brain and Spine institute, INSERM UMR 1127, CNRS 7225
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Stroke and Healthy Subjects, run by Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, France at 1 site in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Dec 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
change in lateralization indices in the primary motor cortex using functional magnetic Resonance (time frame: Change from Baseline to day 5 (Pre and post intervention)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02284087, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Dec 2025.