SurgeryNCT02284100
Animal-assisted Therapy in Pediatric Surgery: Post-operative Benefits
A study testing animal assisted therapy in people with Surgery, run by Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo di Pavia.
Trial summary
The relationship between human beings and animals, especially dogs, has existed for thousands of years. Historically, animals have held an important role in this relationship as they provide company, stimulus and motivation. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 3 to 17 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Surgery
- What is being tested?
- animal assisted therapy
- Type of treatment
- Vaccines, Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 40 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Sep 2013to Sep 2014
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 3 to 17 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- immunocompetent children (both genders)
- aged 3 to 17 years
- undergoing surgical procedures (including orchidopexy, inguinal or umbilical hernia repair, circumcision, varicocele treatment)
Who cannot join
- allergy or fear of dogs
- previous AAT experience
- immunodeficiency
- chronic illness
- obesity and use of any medications.
About this study
Official title: Animal-assisted Therapy in Pediatric Surgery: Cardiovascular, Neurological and Endocrinological Responses to Stress and Pain in the Immediate Post-operative Period
The relationship between human beings and animals, especially dogs, has existed for thousands of years. Historically, animals have held an important role in this relationship as they provide company, stimulus and motivation. Animals are excellent company, since their visitation they do not discriminate or segregate any person, that is, they are free of prejudice.
In spite of the long-lasting presence of companion animals in human life, the idea that interaction with animals may exert a positive effect on human health is rather recent.
Read more
The American Veterinary Medical Association classifies therapeutic animal assisted interventions (AAI) into three categories: animal assisted activities (AAA) that utilize companion animals; animal assisted therapy (AAT) that utilizes therapy animals and service animal programs (SAP) that utilize service animals. AAT in particular, is a goal-directed intervention in which an animal that meets specific criteria is an integral part of the treatment process. AAT is technically defined as the use of trained animals by trained health professionals to facilitate specific, measurable goals for individual patients for whom there is documentation of progress .
Interest in AAT has been fueled by studies supporting the many health benefits. AAT has proven a useful adjunct in a variety of settings including mental health facilities, nursing homes and hospitals where most studies have been performed with adult patients with variable interventions, goals, patient characteristic and patient needs. In these studies, AAT resulted in significant reductions in anxiety, agitation and fear. In children, AAT dogs decreased distress during painful medical procedures, promoted calmness in children with post-traumatic stress disorders and increased attention and positive behaviors in children with pervasive developmental disorders.
Surgical procedures and hospitalization can be stressful for both children and their parents and they are associated with pain, helplessness, fear and boredom. AAT has been shown to facilitate a child's ability to cope with hospitalization, but to date, no studies on AAT benefits in pediatric surgery have been reported.
The purpose of this study was to better understand the effects of an AAT program on neurological, cardiovascular and endocrinological responses to stress and pain in the immediate post-operative period in children undergoing surgical procedures.
Read the detailed description
Interest in animal-assisted therapy has been fueled by studies supporting the many health benefits in the adult and pediatric age. The purpose of this study was to study the impact of an AAT program on cardiovascular, neurological and endocrinological responses to stress and pain in the immediate post-operative period following pediatric surgery.
Forty immunocompetent children undergoing surgical procedures (including orchidopexy, inguinal or umbilical hernia repair, circumcision, varicocele treatment) were sequentially enrolled.
This was a randomised open-label, controlled, pilot study. The different arms consisted of an experimental group with a AAT session after a surgical procedure and a control group with standard care after surgery.
The study variables were determined in each patient independently of the assigned group, before and after the experimental intervention, by a researcher unblinded to the patient's group.
The outcomes of the study were to define the impact of AAT on neurological, cardiovascular and endocrinological signs, in response to stress and pain in children undergoing surgical procedures.
As outcome measures the investigators considered:
- for neurological impact, the difference in the prevalence of beta (>14 Hz) electroencephalogram (EEG) activity between intervention and control group (20-23);
- for autonomic impact, the difference in blood pressure (BP) between intervention and control group;
- for cardiac impact, the difference in heart rate (HR) between intervention and control group;
- for respiratory impact, the difference in oxygen saturation (SpO2) between intervention and control group;
- for cerebral oxygenation, the difference in prefrontal oxygenation (HbO2) with near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) between intervention and control group;
- for endocrinological impact, the difference in salivary cortisol levels, between intervention and control group. The Wong-Baker Faces pain scale (FPS) was used to measure the child's self-reported pain.
At admission, auxological examination of the children included measurement of height, weight and body mass index. Height measurement was performed with patients in an upright position, without shoes, with their heels together, arms extended down the sides of the body and head positioned parallel to the floor. Weight was measured with the children barefooted and wearing light clothes, standing upright in the centre of the scale platform with their arms extended down the sides of the body. BMI was calculated as body weight in kilograms divided by body height squared in meters.
EEG activity, cerebral prefrontal oxygenation, heart rate, blood pressure, oxygen saturation, salivary cortisol levels, faces pain scale were considered as indicators of neurological, cardiovascular and endocrinological response to stress and pain.
Data collection was performed in the following phases:
- for all parameters, post-operatively baseline (T1), two hours after surgery at re-admission to the Unit. Pre dog-intervention in the AAT-group;
- for all parameters, in the twenty minutes following T1 (T2). During the dog-intervention in the AAT-group. For the STAND-group, the child was asked to sit quietly;
- only for salivary cortisol levels, between 11 pm and midnight (T3, the time when cortisol is normally at its lowest)
Vitals signs
HR, BP, SpO2, HbO2 were monitored (Dräger Primus ®) and recorded as follows:
- T1 (every 5 minutes, for 10 minutes. Mean values were used for the statistical analysis);
- T2 (every 5 minutes, for 20 minutes. Mean values were used for the statistical analysis).
Endocrinological parameters Salivary cortisol levels were measured at T1, after T2 and T3. The saliva samples were collected using a standardized salivette and frozen at -20° until analysis in the laboratory. After thawing, salivary fluids were centrifugated to precipitate mucins and cortisol was assayed in the supernatant with a solid-phase radioimmunoassay, wherein 125-I labeled cortisol competes for a fixed time with cortisol in the biological sample (The Coat-A-Count Cortisol, Siemens, Los Angeles, CA).
Pain response The faces pain scale was used to measure the child's self-reported pain at T1 and at the end of T2. This scale consisted of 6 cartoon faces with varying expressions ranging from very happy to very sad. The child rated the pain intensity on a scale, with point 0 being no pain and point 10 being the worst pain.
Analgesic treatment in the first 12 hours post-intervention was recorded.
Electroencephalogram Regarding the AAT-group patients, an EEG recording was obtained when the child was awake, 2 hours after surgery and before and during AAT intervention. In the STAND-group patients, and EEG recording was made 2 hours after surgery.
Any change in the normal physiological structure of the EEG, correlating the effect of the anaesthesia, post-operative stress of AAT intervention was recorded and monitored.
In both cases, the protocol included an EEG recording tasting about 20 minutes, while awake, with open and closed eyes.
Parental permission was obtained through a written and oral informed consent. Written assent by the patient was also obtained in children eight years of age and older before enrolment.
Statistical analysis A desired sample size of 20 patients per group for a total of 40 subjects was determined based on 80% power alpha=0.10 (pilot study), using a 2-tailed test, to detect an effect size of 0.8 for the primary endpoint measured on a continuous scale, and an absolute difference in prevalence of the primary endpoint of 31 to 34% for the expected prevalence in the control group of 5 and 10% respectively.
Continuous variables were described as the mean and standard deviation (SD) or median and quartiles and categorical variables as counts and percentages. The prevalence of EEG beta activity was compared with the Fisher exact test. To test the effects of AAT on vital signs and on endocrinological parameters over time in the two groups, regression models for repeated measures were used, including a main effect for group and time, as well as their interaction. Distribution of pain scores at the end of the session in the two groups was compared with the Fisher exact test. A 2-sided p-value<0.05 was considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed using Stata 13.1 (StataCorp, College Station, Texas, USA).
- Conditions
- Surgery
- Being tested
- animal assisted therapy
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
animal assisted therapyBehavioural
For the AAT session, a 7 year old Golden Retriever was employed as the therapy animal. Prior to the study, the dog underwent rigorous screening although she had previous experience in Animal Assisted Interventions and was already trained and prepared prior for this type of work. The dog was fully vaccinated, bathed regularly, screened for enteric pathogens, and treated for internal and external parasites on a monthly basis. The dog and handler met hospital policy for participating in animal-assisted therapy, including documentation of the dog's current vaccinations, controllability and temperament.
The welfare of the dog was monitored and certificated by a dedicated veterinary during and at the end of the all sessions.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| animal assisted therapy group | Experimental | the dog was present during post-operative awakening (2 hours after surgery) Receives: Behavioral: animal assisted therapy |
| standard group | No intervention | children had standard post-operative medical care |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Neurological impact
Neurological impact assessed by the difference in prevalence of beta (>14 Hz) electroencephalogram (EEG) activity between intervention and control group.
Measured: Partecipants will be followed for the duration of immediate postoperative period, an expected average of 4 hours
Secondary outcomes (4)
Autonomic impact
Autonomic impact assessed by the difference in blood pressure (BP) between intervention and control group
Measured: Partecipants will be followed for the duration of immediate postoperative period, an expected average of 4 hours
Cardiac impact
Cardiac impact assessed by the difference in heart rate between intervention and control group
Measured: Partecipants will be followed for the duration of immediate postoperative period, an expected average of 4 hours
Respiratory impact
Respiratory impact assessed by the difference in oxygen saturation (SpO2) between intervention and control group
Measured: Partecipants will be followed for the duration of immediate postoperative period, an expected average of 4 hours
Cerebral oxygenation
Cerebral oxygenation assessed by the difference in prefrontal oxygenation (HbO2) between intervention and control group
Measured: Partecipants will be followed for the duration of immediate postoperative period, an expected average of 4 hours
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 Nov 2014 (estimated)
- Study startSep 2013
- Primary completionApr 2014
- Study completionSep 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for SurgeryStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo di PaviaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo di Pavia
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Pelizzo Gloria, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo di Pavia
- Investigators
- Gloria Pelizzo, Prof, Principal investigator, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico S. Matteo
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02284100
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 20130005132
- Status last verified
- Nov 2014
- First submitted
- 29 Oct 2014
- Last updated
- 6 Nov 2014
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Calcaterra V, Veggiotti P, Palestrini C, De Giorgis V, Raschetti R, Tumminelli M, Mencherini S, Papotti F, Klersy C, Albertini R, Ostuni S, Pelizzo G. Post-operative benefits of animal-assisted therapy in pediatric surgery: a randomised study. PLoS One. 2015 Jun 3;10(6):e0125813. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0125813. eCollection 2015.
PubMed 26039494
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Nov 2014. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Animal-assisted Therapy in Pediatric Surgery: Cardiovascular, Neurological and Endocrinological Responses to Stress and Pain in the Immediate Post-operative Period
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02284100
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 20130005132
- Conditions
- Surgery
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo di PaviaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Sep 2013
- Primary completion
- Apr 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- Sep 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 5 Nov 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The relationship between human beings and animals, especially dogs, has existed for thousands of years. Historically, animals have held an important role in this relationship as they provide company, stimulus and motivation. Animals are excellent company, since their visitation they do not discriminate or segregate any person, that is, they are free of prejudice.
In spite of the long-lasting presence of companion animals in human life, the idea that interaction with animals may exert a positive effect on human health is rather recent.
The American Veterinary Medical Association classifies therapeutic animal assisted interventions (AAI) into three categories: animal assisted activities (AAA) that utilize companion animals; animal assisted therapy (AAT) that utilizes therapy animals and service animal programs (SAP) that utilize service animals. AAT in particular, is a goal-directed intervention in which an animal that meets specific criteria is an integral part of the treatment process. AAT is technically defined as the use of trained animals by trained health professionals to facilitate specific, measurable goals for individual patients for whom there is documentation of progress .
Interest in AAT has been fueled by studies supporting the many health benefits. AAT has proven a useful adjunct in a variety of settings including mental health facilities, nursing homes and hospitals where most studies have been performed with adult patients with variable interventions, goals, patient characteristic and patient needs. In these studies, AAT resulted in significant reductions in anxiety, agitation and fear. In children, AAT dogs decreased distress during painful medical procedures, promoted calmness in children with post-traumatic stress disorders and increased attention and positive behaviors in children with pervasive developmental disorders.
Surgical procedures and hospitalization can be stressful for both children and their parents and they are associated with pain, helplessness, fear and boredom. AAT has been shown to facilitate a child's ability to cope with hospitalization, but to date, no studies on AAT benefits in pediatric surgery have been reported.
The purpose of this study was to better understand the effects of an AAT program on neurological, cardiovascular and endocrinological responses to stress and pain in the immediate post-operative period in children undergoing surgical procedures.
Detailed description
Interest in animal-assisted therapy has been fueled by studies supporting the many health benefits in the adult and pediatric age. The purpose of this study was to study the impact of an AAT program on cardiovascular, neurological and endocrinological responses to stress and pain in the immediate post-operative period following pediatric surgery.
Forty immunocompetent children undergoing surgical procedures (including orchidopexy, inguinal or umbilical hernia repair, circumcision, varicocele treatment) were sequentially enrolled.
This was a randomised open-label, controlled, pilot study. The different arms consisted of an experimental group with a AAT session after a surgical procedure and a control group with standard care after surgery.
The study variables were determined in each patient independently of the assigned group, before and after the experimental intervention, by a researcher unblinded to the patient's group.
The outcomes of the study were to define the impact of AAT on neurological, cardiovascular and endocrinological signs, in response to stress and pain in children undergoing surgical procedures.
As outcome measures the investigators considered:
- for neurological impact, the difference in the prevalence of beta (>14 Hz) electroencephalogram (EEG) activity between intervention and control group (20-23);
- for autonomic impact, the difference in blood pressure (BP) between intervention and control group;
- for cardiac impact, the difference in heart rate (HR) between intervention and control group;
- for respiratory impact, the difference in oxygen saturation (SpO2) between intervention and control group;
- for cerebral oxygenation, the difference in prefrontal oxygenation (HbO2) with near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) between intervention and control group;
- for endocrinological impact, the difference in salivary cortisol levels, between intervention and control group. The Wong-Baker Faces pain scale (FPS) was used to measure the child's self-reported pain.
At admission, auxological examination of the children included measurement of height, weight and body mass index. Height measurement was performed with patients in an upright position, without shoes, with their heels together, arms extended down the sides of the body and head positioned parallel to the floor. Weight was measured with the children barefooted and wearing light clothes, standing upright in the centre of the scale platform with their arms extended down the sides of the body. BMI was calculated as body weight in kilograms divided by body height squared in meters.
EEG activity, cerebral prefrontal oxygenation, heart rate, blood pressure, oxygen saturation, salivary cortisol levels, faces pain scale were considered as indicators of neurological, cardiovascular and endocrinological response to stress and pain.
Data collection was performed in the following phases:
- for all parameters, post-operatively baseline (T1), two hours after surgery at re-admission to the Unit. Pre dog-intervention in the AAT-group;
- for all parameters, in the twenty minutes following T1 (T2). During the dog-intervention in the AAT-group. For the STAND-group, the child was asked to sit quietly;
- only for salivary cortisol levels, between 11 pm and midnight (T3, the time when cortisol is normally at its lowest)
Vitals signs
HR, BP, SpO2, HbO2 were monitored (Dräger Primus ®) and recorded as follows:
- T1 (every 5 minutes, for 10 minutes. Mean values were used for the statistical analysis);
- T2 (every 5 minutes, for 20 minutes. Mean values were used for the statistical analysis).
Endocrinological parameters Salivary cortisol levels were measured at T1, after T2 and T3. The saliva samples were collected using a standardized salivette and frozen at -20° until analysis in the laboratory. After thawing, salivary fluids were centrifugated to precipitate mucins and cortisol was assayed in the supernatant with a solid-phase radioimmunoassay, wherein 125-I labeled cortisol competes for a fixed time with cortisol in the biological sample (The Coat-A-Count Cortisol, Siemens, Los Angeles, CA).
Pain response The faces pain scale was used to measure the child's self-reported pain at T1 and at the end of T2. This scale consisted of 6 cartoon faces with varying expressions ranging from very happy to very sad. The child rated the pain intensity on a scale, with point 0 being no pain and point 10 being the worst pain.
Analgesic treatment in the first 12 hours post-intervention was recorded.
Electroencephalogram Regarding the AAT-group patients, an EEG recording was obtained when the child was awake, 2 hours after surgery and before and during AAT intervention. In the STAND-group patients, and EEG recording was made 2 hours after surgery.
Any change in the normal physiological structure of the EEG, correlating the effect of the anaesthesia, post-operative stress of AAT intervention was recorded and monitored.
In both cases, the protocol included an EEG recording tasting about 20 minutes, while awake, with open and closed eyes.
Parental permission was obtained through a written and oral informed consent. Written assent by the patient was also obtained in children eight years of age and older before enrolment.
Statistical analysis A desired sample size of 20 patients per group for a total of 40 subjects was determined based on 80% power alpha=0.10 (pilot study), using a 2-tailed test, to detect an effect size of 0.8 for the primary endpoint measured on a continuous scale, and an absolute difference in prevalence of the primary endpoint of 31 to 34% for the expected prevalence in the control group of 5 and 10% respectively.
Continuous variables were described as the mean and standard deviation (SD) or median and quartiles and categorical variables as counts and percentages. The prevalence of EEG beta activity was compared with the Fisher exact test. To test the effects of AAT on vital signs and on endocrinological parameters over time in the two groups, regression models for repeated measures were used, including a main effect for group and time, as well as their interaction. Distribution of pain scores at the end of the session in the two groups was compared with the Fisher exact test. A 2-sided p-value<0.05 was considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed using Stata 13.1 (StataCorp, College Station, Texas, USA).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| animal assisted therapy group | Experimental | Behavioral: animal assisted therapythe dog was present during post-operative awakening (2 hours after surgery) |
| standard group | No intervention | –children had standard post-operative medical care |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 3 to 17 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- immunocompetent children (both genders)
- aged 3 to 17 years
- undergoing surgical procedures (including orchidopexy, inguinal or umbilical hernia repair, circumcision, varicocele treatment)
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- allergy or fear of dogs
- previous AAT experience
- immunodeficiency
- chronic illness
- obesity and use of any medications.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| animal assisted therapyFor the AAT session, a 7 year old Golden Retriever was employed as the therapy animal. Prior to the study, the dog underwent rigorous screening although she had previous experience in Animal Assisted Interventions and was already trained and prepared prior for this type of work. The dog was fully vaccinated, bathed regularly, screened for enteric pathogens, and treated for internal and external parasites on a monthly basis. The dog and handler met hospital policy for participating in animal-assisted therapy, including documentation of the dog's current vaccinations, controllability and temperament. The welfare of the dog was monitored and certificated by a dedicated veterinary during and at the end of the all sessions. | Behavioural | animal assisted therapy group |
Primary outcome
Neurological impact
Time frame: Partecipants will be followed for the duration of immediate postoperative period, an expected average of 4 hours
Neurological impact assessed by the difference in prevalence of beta (>14 Hz) electroencephalogram (EEG) activity between intervention and control group.
4 secondary outcomes
Autonomic impact
Time frame: Partecipants will be followed for the duration of immediate postoperative period, an expected average of 4 hours
Cardiac impact
Time frame: Partecipants will be followed for the duration of immediate postoperative period, an expected average of 4 hours
Respiratory impact
Time frame: Partecipants will be followed for the duration of immediate postoperative period, an expected average of 4 hours
Cerebral oxygenation
Time frame: Partecipants will be followed for the duration of immediate postoperative period, an expected average of 4 hours
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Nov 2014.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 26039494Calcaterra V, Veggiotti P, Palestrini C, De Giorgis V, Raschetti R, Tumminelli M, Mencherini S, Papotti F, Klersy C, Albertini R, Ostuni S, Pelizzo G. Post-operative benefits of animal-assisted therapy in pediatric surgery: a randomised study. PLoS One. 2015 Jun 3;10(6):e0125813. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0125813. eCollection 2015.
Related trials for Surgery
Active, not recruiting
Shockwave™ vs Surgical Endarterectomy for Calcified Severe Common Femoral Artery Stenosis: Comparison of Efficacy, Safety and Long-Term Outcomes
Common Femoral Artery Stenosis, Calcification; Heart
RecruitingObservational study
Comparison of Hemodynamic Responses During Anesthesia Induction Using Eleveld and Schnider
Spinal (Fusion) Surgery, Total Intravenous Anesthesia
RecruitingPhase 1
Serial Amnioinfusions as Regenerative Therapy for Pulmonary Hypoplasia
Renal Failure Congenital, Congenital Renal Anomaly Nos
RecruitingPhase 2
Proton Spatially Fractionated Radiotherapy or Photon Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Combination With Pembrolizumab Before Surgery for the Treatment of Locally Advanced and Radiation-Naive Locoregionally Recurrent Oral Cavity Cancer, OSPRI Trial
Locally Advanced Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma, Locally Recurrent Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Testing the Role of DNA Released From Tumor Cells Into the Blood in Guiding the Use of Immunotherapy After Surgical Removal of the Bladder, Kidney, Ureter, and Urethra for Urothelial Cancer Treatment, MODERN Study
Muscle Invasive Bladder Urothelial Carcinoma, Muscle Invasive Renal Pelvis Urothelial Carcinoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Gloria Pelizzo, Prof principal investigator
Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico S. Matteo
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing animal assisted therapy in people with Surgery, run by Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo di Pavia.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Nov 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Neurological impact (time frame: Partecipants will be followed for the duration of immediate postoperative period, an expected average of 4 hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02284100, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Nov 2014.