AzTrials
AzTrials

Ankylosing SpondylitisPEPSNCT02284646

Physical Training Program in Ankylosing Spondylitis

A study testing Personalized physical training program in people with Ankylosing Spondylitis, run by University Hospital, Toulouse at 1 site in France.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Purpose: to assess the efficacy of a physical training program in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) in a randomized controlled study Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 60 years
Conditions the study is for
Ankylosing Spondylitis
What is being tested?
Personalized physical training program
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
56 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
25 Nov 2014to 30 Nov 2019
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 60 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients with AS according to ASAS criteria,
  • treated or not with NSAID,
  • synthetic DMARD or anti-TNF agent.

Who cannot join

  • Contraindications to physical training program (e.g. cardiac failure, pregnancy, painful arthroplasty or lower limbs damaged joint).

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

France1 site
  • University Hospital

    Toulouse, 31000

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: Assessment of the Efficacy of a Physical Training Program in Patients With Ankylosing Spondylitis

Purpose: to assess the efficacy of a physical training program in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) in a randomized controlled study

Read the detailed description

AS is a chronic inflammatory rheumatic disorder affecting spine, peripheral joints and entheses. Patients undergo pain, stiffness and reduced mobility of spine and joints. Patients experience limitations in physical activities and reduced quality of life. Some uncontrolled studies reported benefits of physical activity in patients with AS.

The aim of the present study is to assess the efficacy of a physical training program in patients with AS.

Patients will be randomized in two parallel arms: program of personalized physical training (intervention group [PEPc]) or program of information about physical activity (control group [PIAP]).

Patients will be evaluated at 12 and 24 weeks on activity, functional and metrological scores (ASAS 20, ASAS 5/6, ASDAS, BASDAI, BASFI, BASMI); biological inflammation (CRP); NSAID use and pain VAS.

Primary outcome: percentage of patients reaching an ASAS 20 response at 12 weeks.

Secondary outcomes: ASAS 20 at 24 weeks, ASAS5/6, ASDAS, BASDAI, BASFI, BASMI, CRP, NSAID use and pain VAS at 12 and 24 weeks.

Statistical analysis: comparison of the percentage of patients reaching an ASAS 20 response at 12 weeks in each arm using a Fisher's exact test (main outcome).

Being tested
Personalized physical training program
Keywords
Ankylosing spondylitis, Physical training program
Medical subject headings
Spondylitis, Ankylosing

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Personalized physical training programOther

    9-week personalized physical training program (ergometric bicycle)

Study groups in NCT02284646
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Personalized physical trainingExperimental9-week personalized physical training program (ergometric bicycle)
Receives: Other: Personalized physical training program
Information about physical activityNo intervention2 sessions of information on physical activity

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of patients reaching an ASAS 20 response

    Measured: Week 12

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Percentage of patients reaching an ASAS 20 response

    Measured: Week 24

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted6 Nov 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study start25 Nov 2014
  3. Primary completion24 Oct 2018
  4. Study completion30 Nov 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
56 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02284646
Sponsor's protocol ID
13 7027 08
Acronym
PEPS
Status last verified
Aug 2020
First submitted
3 Nov 2014
Last updated
5 Dec 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Pecourneau V, Degboe Y, Barnetche T, Cantagrel A, Constantin A, Ruyssen-Witrand A. Effectiveness of Exercise Programs in Ankylosing Spondylitis: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018 Feb;99(2):383-389.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.07.015. Epub 2017 Aug 30.

    PubMed 28860095

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Personalized physical training program in people with Ankylosing Spondylitis, run by University Hospital, Toulouse at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Dec 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of patients reaching an ASAS 20 response (time frame: Week 12). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02284646, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Dec 2025.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in