MelanomaPhase 2NCT02285413
Platin-based Chemotherapeutics to Enhance Dendritic Cell Vaccine Efficacy in Melanoma Patients
A Phase 2 study testing DC vaccination and DC vaccination with cisplatinum in people with Melanoma, run by Radboud University Medical Center at 1 site in Netherlands.
Trial summary
This is an exploratory study and the primary objective is the immunogenicity and feasibility of combined chemotherapy-DC vaccination. The secondary objectives are the toxicity and clinical efficacy. This study will provide important data on the immunological efficacy of DC immunochemotherapy. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Melanoma
- What is being tested?
- DC vaccination and DC vaccination with cisplatinum
- Type of treatment
- Vaccines, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 54 participants
- Where
- 1 siteNetherlands
- Study dates
- Feb 2011to Apr 2016
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- All patients:
- histologically documented evidence of melanoma
- stage III or IV melanoma according to the 2001 AJCC criteria
- melanoma expressing gp100. Tyrosinase is not mandatory but will be assessed.
- WHO performance status 0-1 (Karnofsky 100-70)
- life expectancy ≥3 months
Show all 16Show fewer
- age 18-70 years
- no clinical signs or symptoms of CNS metastases
- WBC >3x10^9/l, lymphocytes >0.8x10^9/l, platelets >100x10^9/l, serum creatinine <150 µmol/l, serum bilirubin <25 µmol/l
- normal serum LDH (<450 U/l)
- expected adequacy of follow-up
- no pregnant or lactating women
- written informed consent
- and in addition: Stage III melanoma
- radical regional lymphnode dissection is performed Stage IV melanoma
- at least one unidimensional measurable target lesions according to RECIST, not previously irradiated, and no significant symptoms of disease requiring other palliative treatments
Who cannot join
- any prior chemotherapy, immunotherapy or radiotherapy is allowed if completed more than 4 weeks prior to planned vaccination
- history of any second malignancy in the previous 5 years, with the exception of adequately treated basal cell carcinoma or carcinoma in situ of the cervix
- serious active infections, known HbsAg or HIV positive, or autoimmune diseases or organ allografts
- concomitant use of immunosuppressive drugs
- known allergy to shell fish (since it contains KLH)
- rapidly progressive symptomatic disease
- any serious clinical condition that may interfere with the safe administration of DC
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Netherlands1 site
Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre
Nijmegen, Gelderland, 6500 HB
About this study
Official title: Immunochemotherapy: Do Platin-based Chemotherapeutics Enhance Dendritic Cell Vaccine Efficacy in Melanoma Patients?
This is an exploratory study and the primary objective is the immunogenicity and feasibility of combined chemotherapy-DC vaccination. The secondary objectives are the toxicity and clinical efficacy. This study will provide important data on the immunological efficacy of DC immunochemotherapy.
Read the detailed description
- Rationale Investigators have explored immunotherapy and have now vaccinated well over 200 stage III and IV melanoma patients in the Netherlands with monocyte-derived dendritic cell (DC) vaccines and proved that DC therapy is safe with minimal side effects. Cytotoxic chemotherapy and radiotherapy have long been viewed as strategies that directly impact the viability of the tumor cell, and that the immune system contributed little to their efficacy. The commonly held opinion was that chemotherapy and immunotherapy could not be combined because of the myelo-suppressive effect of most chemotherapeutic agents. However, it becomes increasingly obvious that chemotherapy also possess the capacity to trigger tumor antigen release and danger signals in a manner that provokes engagement of innate and adaptive immunity that may be capitalized upon. Small proof-of-concept clinical trials in cancer patients indicate that the efficacy of anti-cancer vaccines may indeed be enhanced by chemotherapy [2]. Also preliminary observations indicate that chemotherapeutic agents, in particular platinum compounds (cisplatin, carboplatin and oxaliplatin) are immunogenic and may contribute to reverse tumor cell induced immunosuppression/immune deviation. Investigators hypothesize that DC vaccination, when combined with other more conventional anti-tumor treatments such as chemotherapy, that eradicate large numbers of cancer cells, may allow the T cells to clear the remaining cancer cells and to provide immunological memory to prevent relapse.
- Objectives This is an exploratory study and the primary objective is the immunogenicity and feasibility of combined chemotherapy-DC vaccination. The secondary objectives are the toxicity and clinical efficacy. This study will provide important data on the immunological efficacy of DC immunochemotherapy.
- Study design This study is an open label randomized phase II study.
- Study population Our study population consists of melanoma patients, with expression of melanoma associated tumor antigens gp100 and tyrosinase. Melanoma patients with regional lymph node metastasis in whom a radical lymph node dissection is performed within 2 months of inclusion in this study (further referred to as stage III) and melanoma patients with measurable distant metastases (further referred to as stage IV) will be included.
- Main study endpoints The primary objective of the study is to investigate the immunogenicity and feasibility of combined chemotherapy-DC vaccination. The secondary objective is to investigate the toxicity and clinical responses (only in stage IV) upon DC immunochemotherapy.
- Conditions
- Melanoma
- Being tested
- DC vaccination, DC vaccination with cisplatinum
- Keywords
- Melanoma, Dendritic cells, Cisplatin, Vaccine, Immunotherapy
- Medical subject headings
- Melanoma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
DC vaccinationBiological
DC vaccination without cisplatinum
DC vaccination with cisplatinumBiological
DC vaccination with cisplatinum
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| DC vaccination | Experimental | mature DC injected intradermally and intravenously loaded with mRNA encoding tumor-associated antigens gp100 and tyrosinase Receives: Biological: DC vaccination |
| DC vaccination with cisplatinum | Experimental | mature DC injected intradermally and intravenously loaded with mRNA encoding tumor-associated antigens gp100 and tyrosinase. each DC vaccine will be preceded by cisplatin infusion: 50 mg/m2, 1-2h before DC injection. Receives: Biological: DC vaccination with cisplatinum |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Immunogenicity: number of participants with KLH and/or tumor-specific antigens immune responses.
Measured: 5 years
Feasibility: % of vaccines meeting the release criteria.
Measured: 5 years
Secondary outcomes (4)
Toxicity: number of Participants with Adverse Events.
Measured: 5 years
Progression-free survival
Measured: 5 years
Overall survival
Measured: 5 years
Best objective response (only in stage IV)
Measured: 5 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 Nov 2014 (estimated)
- Study startFeb 2011
- Primary completionOct 2015
- Study completionApr 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for MelanomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Radboud University Medical CenterThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 54 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Radboud University Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Winette van der Graaf, professor, Principal investigator, Radboud University Medical Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02285413
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NL32381.000.10
- Status last verified
- May 2016
- First submitted
- 11 May 2013
- Last updated
- 4 May 2016
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 May 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Immunochemotherapy: Do Platin-based Chemotherapeutics Enhance Dendritic Cell Vaccine Efficacy in Melanoma Patients?
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02285413
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- NL32381.000.10
- Conditions
- Melanoma
- Keywords
- Melanoma, Dendritic cells, Cisplatin, Vaccine, Immunotherapy
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 54 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Radboud University Medical CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Feb 2011
- Primary completion
- Oct 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- Apr 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 7 Nov 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is an exploratory study and the primary objective is the immunogenicity and feasibility of combined chemotherapy-DC vaccination. The secondary objectives are the toxicity and clinical efficacy. This study will provide important data on the immunological efficacy of DC immunochemotherapy.
Detailed description
- Rationale Investigators have explored immunotherapy and have now vaccinated well over 200 stage III and IV melanoma patients in the Netherlands with monocyte-derived dendritic cell (DC) vaccines and proved that DC therapy is safe with minimal side effects. Cytotoxic chemotherapy and radiotherapy have long been viewed as strategies that directly impact the viability of the tumor cell, and that the immune system contributed little to their efficacy. The commonly held opinion was that chemotherapy and immunotherapy could not be combined because of the myelo-suppressive effect of most chemotherapeutic agents. However, it becomes increasingly obvious that chemotherapy also possess the capacity to trigger tumor antigen release and danger signals in a manner that provokes engagement of innate and adaptive immunity that may be capitalized upon. Small proof-of-concept clinical trials in cancer patients indicate that the efficacy of anti-cancer vaccines may indeed be enhanced by chemotherapy [2]. Also preliminary observations indicate that chemotherapeutic agents, in particular platinum compounds (cisplatin, carboplatin and oxaliplatin) are immunogenic and may contribute to reverse tumor cell induced immunosuppression/immune deviation. Investigators hypothesize that DC vaccination, when combined with other more conventional anti-tumor treatments such as chemotherapy, that eradicate large numbers of cancer cells, may allow the T cells to clear the remaining cancer cells and to provide immunological memory to prevent relapse.
- Objectives This is an exploratory study and the primary objective is the immunogenicity and feasibility of combined chemotherapy-DC vaccination. The secondary objectives are the toxicity and clinical efficacy. This study will provide important data on the immunological efficacy of DC immunochemotherapy.
- Study design This study is an open label randomized phase II study.
- Study population Our study population consists of melanoma patients, with expression of melanoma associated tumor antigens gp100 and tyrosinase. Melanoma patients with regional lymph node metastasis in whom a radical lymph node dissection is performed within 2 months of inclusion in this study (further referred to as stage III) and melanoma patients with measurable distant metastases (further referred to as stage IV) will be included.
- Main study endpoints The primary objective of the study is to investigate the immunogenicity and feasibility of combined chemotherapy-DC vaccination. The secondary objective is to investigate the toxicity and clinical responses (only in stage IV) upon DC immunochemotherapy.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| DC vaccination | Experimental | Biological: DC vaccinationmature DC injected intradermally and intravenously loaded with mRNA encoding tumor-associated antigens gp100 and tyrosinase |
| DC vaccination with cisplatinum | Experimental | Biological: DC vaccination with cisplatinummature DC injected intradermally and intravenously loaded with mRNA encoding tumor-associated antigens gp100 and tyrosinase. each DC vaccine will be preceded by cisplatin infusion: 50 mg/m2, 1-2h before DC injection. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (16 listed)
- histologically documented evidence of melanoma
- stage III or IV melanoma according to the 2001 AJCC criteria
- melanoma expressing gp100. Tyrosinase is not mandatory but will be assessed.
- WHO performance status 0-1 (Karnofsky 100-70)
- life expectancy ≥3 months
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- any prior chemotherapy, immunotherapy or radiotherapy is allowed if completed more than 4 weeks prior to planned vaccination
- history of any second malignancy in the previous 5 years, with the exception of adequately treated basal cell carcinoma or carcinoma in situ of the cervix
- serious active infections, known HbsAg or HIV positive, or autoimmune diseases or organ allografts
- concomitant use of immunosuppressive drugs
- known allergy to shell fish (since it contains KLH)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| DC vaccinationDC vaccination without cisplatinum | Biological | DC vaccination |
| DC vaccination with cisplatinumDC vaccination with cisplatinum | Biological | DC vaccination with cisplatinum |
Primary outcome
Immunogenicity: number of participants with KLH and/or tumor-specific antigens immune responses.
Time frame: 5 years
Feasibility: % of vaccines meeting the release criteria.
Time frame: 5 years
4 secondary outcomes
Toxicity: number of Participants with Adverse Events.
Time frame: 5 years
Progression-free survival
Time frame: 5 years
Overall survival
Time frame: 5 years
Best objective response (only in stage IV)
Time frame: 5 years
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 May 2016.
Related trials for Melanoma
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1
IL-17 Blockade to Decrease irAEs (REPLAY)
Metastatic Melanoma
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Natural History Study of Early Life Exposures in Agriculture (ELEA)
Prostate Cancer, Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 1
A Feasibility Study Utilizing Immune Recall to Increase Response to Checkpoint Therapy
Melanoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
A Study of Dapansutrile Plus Pembrolizumab in Patients With PD-1 Refractory Advanced Melanoma
Melanoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Winette van der Graaf, professor principal investigator
Radboud University Medical Center
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing DC vaccination and DC vaccination with cisplatinum in people with Melanoma, run by Radboud University Medical Center at 1 site in Netherlands.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 16 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 May 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Immunogenicity: number of participants with KLH and/or tumor-specific antigens immune responses. (time frame: 5 years). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 May 2016.