Health BehaviorNCT02286375
Effects of Health-social Partnership Programme
A study testing Intervention group in people with Health Behavior, run by Frances Kam Yuet WONG at 1 site in Hong Kong.
Trial summary
This paper aims to describe the research protocol that will be used to determine the effectiveness of a health-social partnership intervention programme among community-dwelling older adults Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 60 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Health Behavior
- What is being tested?
- Intervention group
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 460 participants
- Where
- 1 siteHong Kong
- Study dates
- Apr 2016to Mar 2019
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 60 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- People aged 60 or above
- Living within the service area
- Cognitively competent with Chinese version Mini-Mental Status Examination (C-MMSE) with score ≥ 20 (Wong, et al., 2011)
Who cannot join
- Not communicable
- Bed bound
- Not reached by phone
- With psychiatric problems
- Already engaged in structured health or social programs
- Will not stay in Hong Kong for the current two months
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Health-social Partnership Intervention Programme for Community-dwelling Older Adults: a Randomized Controlled Trial
This paper aims to describe the research protocol that will be used to determine the effectiveness of a health-social partnership intervention programme among community-dwelling older adults
Read the detailed description
A staff of community center in service area who will not take part in the study will be involved in drawing a list of potential participants from the accessible population. Simple random sampling will be adopted to recruit participants. Those who meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria and agree to participate in the research study will be assigned to intervention group or customary care group according to the result of randomization.
Sample size calculation was based on power analysis. Power analysis adopts a hypothesis-testing method to determine sample size according to several parameters which include pre-specified significance level, desired power level and expected effect size. Assuming a two-tailed alpha of 0.05, a probability of 0.2 for beta error (80% power), and an effect size of 0.28 after calculating with respect to the same primary outcome measure (self-efficacy) from results of two previous researches which provide home visit and telephone follow up to older adults, 200 subjects per group are required. With reference to the 10% to 15% attrition reported in previous community-dwelling elderly program, assume there is a 20% drop out rate in this study, the total sample size needed is 240 subjects per group i.e. a total of 480 subjects.
In order to assure that the numbers of both groups are equal, a block randomization method will be used. Before randomization, a project team member who will not be involved in the subject recruitment and data collection will prepare a block randomization list with 240 sets of numbers which is either 0 (customary care group) or 1 (intervention group) by using a computer software Research Randomizer (http://www.randomizer.org/). These 240 sets of numbers will be printed out separately and sealed in each envelope. Another project team member, who successfully recruits a subject, will unfold an envelope by sequence after the enrolled participants finished all the baseline assessment and ready for interventions. The number written in the envelope will represent the group of that particular subject.
The group assignments will keep blinded to participants during the whole study period. However, the nurse case manager who will provide care to the participants will know the group allocation. Therefore, this study is a single-blinded design. In order to minimize bias, the nurse case manager will not participate in the data collection procedure.
Descriptive analysis will be calculated using mean and standard deviation for continuous variables, percentage and frequency for categorical variables, and median and quartile range when the continuous variables are not normally distributed. Independent t-tests, Mann-Whitney U test, chi-square test or Fisher's exact test will be used to compare any differences in socio-demographic data or outcome variables between groups. Significant results are indicated if p-value of all statistical analysis is less than 0.05 for two-tailed test. To determine the differences or changes between study group and control group (between group effects), within group effects (time), and the interaction effects (group x time), two way repeated measures Analysis of variances (ANOVA) or co-variances (ANCOVA) will be applied when assumptions for parametric test are fulfilled. When the data cannot fulfill the assumptions of parametric test, Mann-Whitney U test will be applied to compare the differences between groups at each time interval while Friedman test will be used to determine the time effects within each group.
The missing data in the present study will be handled by intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis. Sensitivity analysis will be adopted to compare the results using different missing data handling approach according to the Crochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Data will be computed and analyzed with the assistant of the Statistical package of Social Sciences (SPSS) version 21 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago).
All questionnaires for measuring the outcome variables in this study have been demonstrated good validity and reliability. Nurse case managers and social workers will be trained by the research team members in order to provide consistent interventions from various professionals in the health-social care team and ensure the quality of the program. The nurse case managers will be employed with a criterion of experienced community nursing background. The process of home visits and telephone conversation will be recorded for review and evaluation. The research team members and health-social care team members will have meeting regularly to discuss the cases so as to ensure the practice is aligning with the protocols. This randomized controlled study will also stringently follow the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) statement.
- Conditions
- Health Behavior
- Being tested
- Intervention group
- Keywords
- health-social partnership, self-efficacy
- Medical subject headings
- Health Behavior
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Intervention groupBehavioural
A structured assessment is conducted using the Omaha system. Problems will be identified in the four domains which include environment, psychosocial, physiological and health-related behavior. According to the identified problems, the nurse case manager and older adults will set contract goals and formulate an individual care plan. The nurse case manager will provide information on the basic knowledge of participants' own chronic illnesses; recognition, measurement and management of the early signs and symptoms of a deterioration or exacerbation of diseases; and the importance of health-promoting and self-care activities. A booklet will be given to them for easy reference and act as a reminder to consolidate the knowledge in case the important concepts are forgotten.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention group | Experimental | Interventions include providing comprehensive assessment from Omaha system, giving information regarding the self-care management, assisting and coordinating self-regulating skills and abilities, and providing social support from health-social care team to community-dwelling older adults for three months Receives: Behavioral: Intervention group |
| customary care group | Placebo comparator | Customary care includes receiving community services from the community center in the district, providing monthly social call by a reserch assistant for three months Receives: Behavioral: Intervention group |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The primary outcome will measure the community living older adults the change from baseline in self-efficacy belief in self-care management at home at 3-months and 6-months
All 10-item in the Chinese version are rated on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 1= not at all true to 4= exactly true. Scores on the scale are summated and higher scores indicate greater self-efficacy.Measuring general self-efficacy can provide a way to evaluate the effectiveness of empowerment interventions.
Measured: pre-intervention, 3-month, 6-month
Secondary outcomes (8)
the change of medication adherence to chronic medications from baseline to 3-months and 6-months for community-living older adults
The outcome measure of medication adherence in this study is determined using 8-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-8). This measure is designed to facilitate the recognition of barriers to and behaviors (either intentional or unintentional) associated with adherence to chronic medications such as anti-diabetic and anti-hypertensive drugs.
Measured: pre-intervention, 3-month, 6-month
the change from baseline in physical activity level of community living older adults at 3-months and 6-months
physical activity level of the participants will be measured by the Physical Activity Level for the Elderly (PASE). PASE is a short and easily scored questionnaire that assesses the level of self-reported physical activity of people aged 65 years or older. It comprises 12-item measuring the frequency, duration, the energy spent and the amount of physical activities undertaken over the previous seven days.
Measured: pre-intervention, 3-month, 6-month
the change from baseline in activity of daily living level at 3-months and 6-months
the Modified Barthel index will be used to measures a person's performance in 10 activities of daily living functions using a 5-point Likert scale from 1= total dependent to 5= fully independent. These 10 items are feeding, dressing, grooming, bathing, toileting, bed-chair transfer, bladder and bowel control, ambulation and stair climbing.
Measured: pre-intervention, 3-month, 6-month
the change from baseline in Instrumental activity of daily living level at 3-months and 6-months
the Chinese version of The Lawton Instrumental Activities of daily living scale will be used in assessing the complex activities performance of older adults. It is a four-point scale with 9-items of activities which include use of telephone, transportation, shopping, meal preparation, housework, handyman work, laundry, medication management, and money management.
Measured: pre-intervention, 3-month, 6-month
nutritional status of community-living older adults from pre-intervention to post intervention at 3-months and 6-months
The nutritional status of older adults will be measured by the short form of Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA-SF). The tool comprises six questions which cover the areas of weight, appetite and activity.
Measured: pre-intervention, 3-month, 6-month
the chnage of perception of quality of life from baseline to at 3-months and 6-months post-intervention
Quality of life of community-living older adults is measured by SF-12 questionnaires. This questionnaire is a generic measure, as opposed to one that targets a specific age and disease. It has shown useful in Chinese elderly patients.
Measured: pre-intervention, 3-month, 6-month
the change of depression level of community living older adults from baseline to at 3-months and 6-months post-intervention
The Chinese version of Geriatric depression scale is used to assess the depressive symptoms of community-dwelling older people. The questionnaire consists of 15 questions which are used to explore the feelings of participants with the dichotomous answers.
Measured: pre-intervention, 3-month, 6-month
change from baseline in life satisfaction of community living older adults at 3-months and 6-months
A five-point scale of Global item of life satisfaction is used to measure the Life satisfaction of participants. It has shown a high correlation with a multi-dimensional life satisfaction scale.
Measured: pre-intervention, 3-month, 6-month
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 Nov 2014 (estimated)
- Study startApr 2016
- Primary completionJan 2019
- Study completionMar 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Health BehaviorStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 460 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Frances Kam Yuet WONG
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Frances Kam Yuet WONG, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
- Investigators
- Arkers Wong, Msc, Principal investigator, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02286375
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- HSPP-01
- Status last verified
- Feb 2020
- First submitted
- 8 Oct 2014
- Last updated
- 18 Feb 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Wong GK, Lam SW, Wong A, Lai M, Siu D, Poon WS, Mok V. MoCA-assessed cognitive function and excellent outcome after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage at 1 year. Eur J Neurol. 2014 May;21(5):725-30. doi: 10.1111/ene.12363. Epub 2014 Jan 28.
PubMed 24471651Wong FK, Ho MM, Yeung S, Tam SK, Chow SK. Effects of a health-social partnership transitional program on hospital readmission: a randomized controlled trial. Soc Sci Med. 2011 Oct;73(7):960-9. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.06.036. Epub 2011 Jul 22.
PubMed 21839564Wong FK, Chow SK, Chan TM, Tam SK. Comparison of effects between home visits with telephone calls and telephone calls only for transitional discharge support: a randomised controlled trial. Age Ageing. 2014 Jan;43(1):91-7. doi: 10.1093/ageing/aft123. Epub 2013 Aug 26.
PubMed 23978408Nicolaides-Bouman A, van Rossum E, Habets H, Kempen GI, Knipschild P. Home visiting programme for older people with health problems: process evaluation. J Adv Nurs. 2007 Jun;58(5):425-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04235.x. Epub 2007 Apr 17.
PubMed 17442032Yoo H, Kim CJ, Jang Y, You MA. Self-efficacy associated with self-management behaviours and health status of South Koreans with chronic diseases. Int J Nurs Pract. 2011 Dec;17(6):599-606. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-172X.2011.01970.x.
PubMed 22103826
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Feb 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Health-social Partnership Intervention Programme for Community-dwelling Older Adults: a Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02286375
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- HSPP-01
- Conditions
- Health Behavior
- Keywords
- health-social partnership, self-efficacy
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 460 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Frances Kam Yuet WONGUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Apr 2016
- Primary completion
- Jan 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- Mar 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 7 Nov 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This paper aims to describe the research protocol that will be used to determine the effectiveness of a health-social partnership intervention programme among community-dwelling older adults
Detailed description
A staff of community center in service area who will not take part in the study will be involved in drawing a list of potential participants from the accessible population. Simple random sampling will be adopted to recruit participants. Those who meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria and agree to participate in the research study will be assigned to intervention group or customary care group according to the result of randomization.
Sample size calculation was based on power analysis. Power analysis adopts a hypothesis-testing method to determine sample size according to several parameters which include pre-specified significance level, desired power level and expected effect size. Assuming a two-tailed alpha of 0.05, a probability of 0.2 for beta error (80% power), and an effect size of 0.28 after calculating with respect to the same primary outcome measure (self-efficacy) from results of two previous researches which provide home visit and telephone follow up to older adults, 200 subjects per group are required. With reference to the 10% to 15% attrition reported in previous community-dwelling elderly program, assume there is a 20% drop out rate in this study, the total sample size needed is 240 subjects per group i.e. a total of 480 subjects.
In order to assure that the numbers of both groups are equal, a block randomization method will be used. Before randomization, a project team member who will not be involved in the subject recruitment and data collection will prepare a block randomization list with 240 sets of numbers which is either 0 (customary care group) or 1 (intervention group) by using a computer software Research Randomizer (http://www.randomizer.org/). These 240 sets of numbers will be printed out separately and sealed in each envelope. Another project team member, who successfully recruits a subject, will unfold an envelope by sequence after the enrolled participants finished all the baseline assessment and ready for interventions. The number written in the envelope will represent the group of that particular subject.
The group assignments will keep blinded to participants during the whole study period. However, the nurse case manager who will provide care to the participants will know the group allocation. Therefore, this study is a single-blinded design. In order to minimize bias, the nurse case manager will not participate in the data collection procedure.
Descriptive analysis will be calculated using mean and standard deviation for continuous variables, percentage and frequency for categorical variables, and median and quartile range when the continuous variables are not normally distributed. Independent t-tests, Mann-Whitney U test, chi-square test or Fisher's exact test will be used to compare any differences in socio-demographic data or outcome variables between groups. Significant results are indicated if p-value of all statistical analysis is less than 0.05 for two-tailed test. To determine the differences or changes between study group and control group (between group effects), within group effects (time), and the interaction effects (group x time), two way repeated measures Analysis of variances (ANOVA) or co-variances (ANCOVA) will be applied when assumptions for parametric test are fulfilled. When the data cannot fulfill the assumptions of parametric test, Mann-Whitney U test will be applied to compare the differences between groups at each time interval while Friedman test will be used to determine the time effects within each group.
The missing data in the present study will be handled by intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis. Sensitivity analysis will be adopted to compare the results using different missing data handling approach according to the Crochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Data will be computed and analyzed with the assistant of the Statistical package of Social Sciences (SPSS) version 21 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago).
All questionnaires for measuring the outcome variables in this study have been demonstrated good validity and reliability. Nurse case managers and social workers will be trained by the research team members in order to provide consistent interventions from various professionals in the health-social care team and ensure the quality of the program. The nurse case managers will be employed with a criterion of experienced community nursing background. The process of home visits and telephone conversation will be recorded for review and evaluation. The research team members and health-social care team members will have meeting regularly to discuss the cases so as to ensure the practice is aligning with the protocols. This randomized controlled study will also stringently follow the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) statement.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention group | Experimental | Behavioral: Intervention groupInterventions include providing comprehensive assessment from Omaha system, giving information regarding the self-care management, assisting and coordinating self-regulating skills and abilities, and providing social support from health-social care team to community-dwelling older adults for three months |
| customary care group | Placebo comparator | Behavioral: Intervention groupCustomary care includes receiving community services from the community center in the district, providing monthly social call by a reserch assistant for three months |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 60 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- People aged 60 or above
- Living within the service area
- Cognitively competent with Chinese version Mini-Mental Status Examination (C-MMSE) with score ≥ 20 (Wong, et al., 2011)
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Not communicable
- Bed bound
- Not reached by phone
- With psychiatric problems
- Already engaged in structured health or social programs
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention groupA structured assessment is conducted using the Omaha system. Problems will be identified in the four domains which include environment, psychosocial, physiological and health-related behavior. According to the identified problems, the nurse case manager and older adults will set contract goals and formulate an individual care plan. The nurse case manager will provide information on the basic knowledge of participants' own chronic illnesses; recognition, measurement and management of the early signs and symptoms of a deterioration or exacerbation of diseases; and the importance of health-promoting and self-care activities. A booklet will be given to them for easy reference and act as a reminder to consolidate the knowledge in case the important concepts are forgotten. | Behavioural | Intervention group, customary care group |
Primary outcome
The primary outcome will measure the community living older adults the change from baseline in self-efficacy belief in self-care management at home at 3-months and 6-months
Time frame: pre-intervention, 3-month, 6-month
All 10-item in the Chinese version are rated on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 1= not at all true to 4= exactly true. Scores on the scale are summated and higher scores indicate greater self-efficacy.Measuring general self-efficacy can provide a way to evaluate the effectiveness of empowerment interventions.
8 secondary outcomes
the change of medication adherence to chronic medications from baseline to 3-months and 6-months for community-living older adults
Time frame: pre-intervention, 3-month, 6-month
the change from baseline in physical activity level of community living older adults at 3-months and 6-months
Time frame: pre-intervention, 3-month, 6-month
the change from baseline in activity of daily living level at 3-months and 6-months
Time frame: pre-intervention, 3-month, 6-month
the change from baseline in Instrumental activity of daily living level at 3-months and 6-months
Time frame: pre-intervention, 3-month, 6-month
nutritional status of community-living older adults from pre-intervention to post intervention at 3-months and 6-months
Time frame: pre-intervention, 3-month, 6-month
the chnage of perception of quality of life from baseline to at 3-months and 6-months post-intervention
Time frame: pre-intervention, 3-month, 6-month
the change of depression level of community living older adults from baseline to at 3-months and 6-months post-intervention
Time frame: pre-intervention, 3-month, 6-month
change from baseline in life satisfaction of community living older adults at 3-months and 6-months
Time frame: pre-intervention, 3-month, 6-month
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Feb 2020.
- Results publication: PubMed 24471651Wong GK, Lam SW, Wong A, Lai M, Siu D, Poon WS, Mok V. MoCA-assessed cognitive function and excellent outcome after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage at 1 year. Eur J Neurol. 2014 May;21(5):725-30. doi: 10.1111/ene.12363. Epub 2014 Jan 28.
- Results publication: PubMed 21839564Wong FK, Ho MM, Yeung S, Tam SK, Chow SK. Effects of a health-social partnership transitional program on hospital readmission: a randomized controlled trial. Soc Sci Med. 2011 Oct;73(7):960-9. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.06.036. Epub 2011 Jul 22.
- Results publication: PubMed 23978408Wong FK, Chow SK, Chan TM, Tam SK. Comparison of effects between home visits with telephone calls and telephone calls only for transitional discharge support: a randomised controlled trial. Age Ageing. 2014 Jan;43(1):91-7. doi: 10.1093/ageing/aft123. Epub 2013 Aug 26.
- Results publication: PubMed 17442032Nicolaides-Bouman A, van Rossum E, Habets H, Kempen GI, Knipschild P. Home visiting programme for older people with health problems: process evaluation. J Adv Nurs. 2007 Jun;58(5):425-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04235.x. Epub 2007 Apr 17.
- Results publication: PubMed 22103826Yoo H, Kim CJ, Jang Y, You MA. Self-efficacy associated with self-management behaviours and health status of South Koreans with chronic diseases. Int J Nurs Pract. 2011 Dec;17(6):599-606. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-172X.2011.01970.x.
Related trials for Health Behavior
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Validation of the Healthcare Relationship Assessment Scale (ERA) in Health Sciences Students.
Health Adult Subjects, Communication
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Stress Ball Use During Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal After Coronary Angiography
Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal, Stress Ball
Not yet recruiting
Preventive and Personalized Digital Emotion Regulation Skills Intervention to Reduce Depression and Anxiety in Youths With Adverse Childhood Experiences
Adverse Childhood Experience, Depression / Major Depressive Disorder
Recruiting
Effect of a Brief Daily Digital Meditation on Well-Being in US Young Adults (BEGIN II)
Mental Health and General Well-being
Not yet recruiting
HealthMpowerment Korea: Pilot Testing the Cultural Adaptation of a Digital HIV Intervention for Men Who Have Sex With Men in South Korea
HIV Infections, HIV Prevention and Care
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Arkers Wong, Msc principal investigator
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Intervention group in people with Health Behavior, run by Frances Kam Yuet WONG at 1 site in Hong Kong.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Feb 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Hong Kong. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The primary outcome will measure the community living older adults the change from baseline in self-efficacy belief in self-care management at home at 3-months and 6-months (time frame: pre-intervention, 3-month, 6-month). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02286375, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Feb 2020.