Multiple MyelomaPhase 3DSMM-IINCT02288741
Tandem Melphalan and Autolog. SCT in MM Patients 60 to 70 Years of Age With and Without Induction Chemotherapy
A Phase 3 study testing Anthracycline/dexamethasone-based induction chemotherapy, Tumor-reduction chemotherapy and stem cell mobilization and Stem cell apheresis in people with Multiple Myeloma, run by WiSP Wissenschaftlicher Service Pharma GmbH.
Trial summary
Patients 60 to 70 years of age with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma were prospectively randomized between 4 cycles of anthracycline/dexamethasone-based induction chemotherapy (A1) or only 2 x 4 days of dexamethasone (A2). A reference arm included patients who could not be randomized (B). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 60 to 70 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Multiple Myeloma
- What is being tested?
- Anthracycline/dexamethasone-based induction chemotherapy, Tumor-reduction chemotherapy and stem cell mobilization and Stem cell apheresis
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 549 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Aug 2001to Sep 2012
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 60 to 70 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Histological confirmed multiple myeloma stage II or III according to the classification of Salmon and Durie
- Aged between 60 and 70 years
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-2
- Signed and dated written informed consent
- No previous chemotherapy or not more than one cycle in total or previous chemotherapy of more than one cycle if paused for at least 6 months and not more than six cycles in total (arm A1 and A2 only)
- Ongoing primary chemotherapy of two to maximum six cycles (arm B only)
Who cannot join
- Multiple myeloma stage I according to the classification of Salmon and Durie without need of any therapy
- Aged under 60 or over 70 years
- ECOG performance status >2
- Previous chemotherapy of more than six cycles
- Informed consent missing
- Myocardial infarction within the last six months
Show all 16Show fewer
- Cardiac dysrhythmia stage IV b according to the classification of Lown
- Heart failure >NYHA II according to the classification of the New York Heart Association (NYHA), left ventricular ejection fraction <50% in ECG
- Severe restrictive or obstructive pulmonary disease (diffusing capacity <60% under normal)
- Renal insufficiency including a serum creatinine level >2mg/dl if not caused by multiple myeloma and reversible
- Liver diseases combined with an elevation of transaminases and of bilirubin of three times above normal
- Severe infections (HIV, hepatitis B/C, syphilis etc. )
- Severe psychiatric disease
- Other not curative treated malignant tumor within the last five years
- Concurrent participation in other clinical studies
- Other not curative treated malignant tumor within the last five years
About this study
Official title: Phase III-study for Evaluation of Induction Therapy Before Stem Cell Mobilization and Tandem High-dose Melphalan in Multiple Myeloma Patients 60 to 70 Years of Age
Patients 60 to 70 years of age with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma were prospectively randomized between 4 cycles of anthracycline/dexamethasone-based induction chemotherapy (A1) or only 2 x 4 days of dexamethasone (A2). A reference arm included patients who could not be randomized (B). Tandem melphalan 140 mg/m² (MEL140) with autologous transplantation was scheduled for all patients.
Read the detailed description
In arm A1, patients received 4 cycles of conventional induction therapy with anthracycline/dexamethasone-based regimens. Specified in the protocol were vincristine/doxorubicin/dexamethasone (VAD), idarubicin/dexamethasone (ID) and cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin/dexamethasone (CAD). In arm A2, patients were planned to receive only dexamethasone 40 mg orally on days 1-4 and 8-11 for symptom control before stem cell mobilization. For the patients in arm B, a maximum of 6 cycles of induction chemotherapy was allowed. Following this, the treatment was identical for all patients. For stem cell mobilization, an age-adjusted IEV-regimen with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) was recommended. The target dose for stem cell collection was 6 x 10E+6 CD34 (cluster of differentiation 34)-positive cells/kg (2 transplants and one back-up). The standard dose for each transplantation was 2 x 10E+6 CD34-positive cells/kg. High-dose melphalan at a total dose of 140 mg/m² (MEL140) was given in two doses of 70 mg/m² on days -3 and -2. Stem cell transplantation (SCT) was performed on day 0. A second MEL140 course was planned two months after the first. Regular bisphosphonate treatment was recommended.
- Conditions
- Multiple Myeloma
- Being tested
- Anthracycline/dexamethasone-based induction chemotherapy, Dexamethasone for control of symptoms, Tumor-reduction chemotherapy and stem cell mobilization, Stem cell apheresis, Tandem high-dose chemotherapy (melphalan)
- Keywords
- high-dose chemotherapy, autologous blood stem-cell transplantation, induction chemotherapy, elderly patients
- Medical subject headings
- Multiple Myeloma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Anthracycline/dexamethasone-based induction chemotherapyDrug
Also called ID, VAD, CAD
4 cycles of anthracycline/dexamethasone-based chemotherapy
Dexamethasone for control of symptomsDrug
Also called dexamethasone
2 x 4 days of dexamethasone (day 1-4 and day 8-11: 40mg)
Tumor-reduction chemotherapy and stem cell mobilizationDrug
Also called IEV + G-CSF
Ifosfamide (day 1-3: 1.900mg/m² iv), epirubicin (day 1: 75 mg/m² iv), etoposide (day 1-3: 120 mg/m² iv) and G-CSF (day 5 until end of apheresis: 5µg/kg sc)
Stem cell apheresisProcedure or surgery
Also called SC-apheresis
stem cell apheresis in peripheral blood, sought amount of CD34-cells: 6 * 10E6/kg
Tandem high-dose chemotherapy (melphalan)Drug
Also called Tandem melphalan
Two cycles of high-dose melphalan (day -3 and day -2: 70mg/m²)
Autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantationProcedure or surgery
Also called PBSCT
Two infusions of collected stem cells (day 0: 2*10E6 CD34-cell/kg per transplantation)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| A1: Induction chemotherapy | Experimental | Anthracycline/dexamethasone-based induction chemotherapy Tumor-reduction chemotherapy and stem cell mobilization Stem cell apheresis Tandem high-dose chemotherapy Autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation Receives: Drug: Anthracycline/dexamethasone-based induction chemotherapy; Drug: Tumor-reduction chemotherapy and stem cell mobilization; Procedure: Stem cell apheresis; Drug: Tandem high-dose chemotherapy (melphalan); Procedure: Autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation |
| A2: No induction chemotherapy | Active comparator | Dexamethasone for control of symptoms Tumor-reduction chemotherapy and stem cell mobilization Stem cell apheresis Tandem high-dose chemotherapy Autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation Receives: Drug: Dexamethasone for control of symptoms; Drug: Tumor-reduction chemotherapy and stem cell mobilization; Procedure: Stem cell apheresis; Drug: Tandem high-dose chemotherapy (melphalan); Procedure: Autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation |
| B: Observation | Other | Tumor-reduction chemotherapy and stem cell mobilization Stem cell apheresis Tandem high-dose chemotherapy Autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation Receives: Drug: Anthracycline/dexamethasone-based induction chemotherapy; Drug: Tumor-reduction chemotherapy and stem cell mobilization; Procedure: Stem cell apheresis; Drug: Tandem high-dose chemotherapy (melphalan); Procedure: Autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Event free survival
Calculated according to the method of Kaplan and Meier
Measured: From randomization to 10 years follow up
Secondary outcomes (5)
Overall survival
Calculated according to the method of Kaplan and Meier
Measured: From randomization to 10 years follow up
Rate of remission (Evaluation of the overall response rate)
Evaluation of the overall response rate. Overall repose is defined as complete response + partial response. The definition of remission followed the criteria of Bladé.
Measured: After last therapy to at least 6 weeks thereafter
Quality of remission (Evaluation of the best response)
Evaluation of the best response. Response is evaluated after induction therapy, tumor-reduction chemotherapy and stem cell mobilization and each high-dose chemotherapy. The definition of remission followed the criteria of Bladé.
Measured: After last therapy to at least 6 weeks thereafter
Short and long time toxicity according to NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE)
Examination of the maximum grade of toxicity according to NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE)
Measured: From randomization until 2 years after last therapy
Cytogenetic examination (Univariate analysis according to the method of Kaplan and Meier. Multivariate analysis according to the method of Cox´s proportional hazards regression analysis.)
Examination of cytogenetic abnormalities wich are of major importance to define longer or shorter survival. Univariate analysis according to the method of Kaplan and Meier. Multivariate analysis according to the method of Cox´s proportional hazards regression analysis.
Measured: From randomization to 10 years follow up
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Nov 2014 (estimated)
- Study startAug 2001
- Primary completionSep 2012
- Study completionSep 2012
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (6)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Multiple MyelomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 549 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- WiSP Wissenschaftlicher Service Pharma GmbH
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Christian Straka, Prof. Dr., Principal investigator, Schön Klink Starnberger See
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02288741
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- WiSP_AM71
- Other IDs
- protocol version 08/01/2001
- Acronym
- DSMM-II
- Status last verified
- Nov 2014
- First submitted
- 23 Oct 2014
- Last updated
- 11 Nov 2014
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Blade J, Samson D, Reece D, Apperley J, Bjorkstrand B, Gahrton G, Gertz M, Giralt S, Jagannath S, Vesole D. Criteria for evaluating disease response and progression in patients with multiple myeloma treated by high-dose therapy and haemopoietic stem cell transplantation. Myeloma Subcommittee of the EBMT. European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplant. Br J Haematol. 1998 Sep;102(5):1115-23. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.1998.00930.x. No abstract available.
PubMed 9753033Alexanian R, Barlogie B, Tucker S. VAD-based regimens as primary treatment for multiple myeloma. Am J Hematol. 1990 Feb;33(2):86-9. doi: 10.1002/ajh.2830330203.
PubMed 2301376Clark AD, Douglas KW, Mitchell LD, McQuaker IG, Parker AN, Tansey PJ, Franklin IM, Cook G. Dose escalation therapy in previously untreated patients with multiple myeloma following Z-Dex induction treatment. Br J Haematol. 2002 Jun;117(3):605-12. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.2002.03519.x.
PubMed 12028028Straka C, Hebart H, Adler-Reichel S, Werding N, Emmerich B, Einsele H. Blood stem cell collections after mobilization with combination chemotherapy containing ifosfamide followed by G-CSF in multiple myeloma. Oncology. 2003;65 Suppl 2:94-8. doi: 10.1159/000073368.
PubMed 14586157Szelenyi H, Kreuser ED, Keilholz U, Menssen HD, Keitel-Wittig C, Siehl J, Knauf W, Thiel E. Cyclophosphamide, adriamycin and dexamethasone (CAD) is a highly effective therapy for patients with advanced multiple myeloma. Ann Oncol. 2001 Jan;12(1):105-8. doi: 10.1023/a:1008362107080.
PubMed 11249035Straka C, Liebisch P, Salwender H, Hennemann B, Metzner B, Knop S, Adler-Reichel S, Gerecke C, Wandt H, Bentz M, Bruemmendorf TH, Hentrich M, Pfreundschuh M, Wolf HH, Sezer O, Bargou R, Jung W, Trumper L, Hertenstein B, Heidemann E, Bernhard H, Lang N, Frickhofen N, Hebart H, Schmidmaier R, Sandermann A, Dechow T, Reichle A, Schnabel B, Schafer-Eckart K, Langer C, Gramatzki M, Hinke A, Emmerich B, Einsele H. Autotransplant with and without induction chemotherapy in older multiple myeloma patients: long-term outcome of a randomized trial. Haematologica. 2016 Nov;101(11):1398-1406. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2016.151860. Epub 2016 Aug 4.
PubMed 27662018
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 Nov 2014. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Phase III-study for Evaluation of Induction Therapy Before Stem Cell Mobilization and Tandem High-dose Melphalan in Multiple Myeloma Patients 60 to 70 Years of Age
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02288741
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- DSMM-II / WiSP_AM71
- Conditions
- Multiple Myeloma
- Keywords
- high-dose chemotherapy, autologous blood stem-cell transplantation, induction chemotherapy, elderly patients
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 549 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- WiSP Wissenschaftlicher Service Pharma GmbHUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Aug 2001
- Primary completion
- Sep 2012 (actual)
- Study completion
- Sep 2012 (actual)
- First posted
- 11 Nov 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Patients 60 to 70 years of age with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma were prospectively randomized between 4 cycles of anthracycline/dexamethasone-based induction chemotherapy (A1) or only 2 x 4 days of dexamethasone (A2). A reference arm included patients who could not be randomized (B). Tandem melphalan 140 mg/m² (MEL140) with autologous transplantation was scheduled for all patients.
Detailed description
In arm A1, patients received 4 cycles of conventional induction therapy with anthracycline/dexamethasone-based regimens. Specified in the protocol were vincristine/doxorubicin/dexamethasone (VAD), idarubicin/dexamethasone (ID) and cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin/dexamethasone (CAD). In arm A2, patients were planned to receive only dexamethasone 40 mg orally on days 1-4 and 8-11 for symptom control before stem cell mobilization. For the patients in arm B, a maximum of 6 cycles of induction chemotherapy was allowed. Following this, the treatment was identical for all patients. For stem cell mobilization, an age-adjusted IEV-regimen with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) was recommended. The target dose for stem cell collection was 6 x 10E+6 CD34 (cluster of differentiation 34)-positive cells/kg (2 transplants and one back-up). The standard dose for each transplantation was 2 x 10E+6 CD34-positive cells/kg. High-dose melphalan at a total dose of 140 mg/m² (MEL140) was given in two doses of 70 mg/m² on days -3 and -2. Stem cell transplantation (SCT) was performed on day 0. A second MEL140 course was planned two months after the first. Regular bisphosphonate treatment was recommended.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| A1: Induction chemotherapy | Experimental | Drug: Anthracycline/dexamethasone-based induction chemotherapy, Drug: Tumor-reduction chemotherapy and stem cell mobilization, Procedure: Stem cell apheresis, Drug: Tandem high-dose chemotherapy (melphalan), Procedure: Autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantationAnthracycline/dexamethasone-based induction chemotherapy Tumor-reduction chemotherapy and stem cell mobilization Stem cell apheresis Tandem high-dose chemotherapy Autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation |
| A2: No induction chemotherapy | Active comparator | Drug: Dexamethasone for control of symptoms, Drug: Tumor-reduction chemotherapy and stem cell mobilization, Procedure: Stem cell apheresis, Drug: Tandem high-dose chemotherapy (melphalan), Procedure: Autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantationDexamethasone for control of symptoms Tumor-reduction chemotherapy and stem cell mobilization Stem cell apheresis Tandem high-dose chemotherapy Autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation |
| B: Observation | Other | Drug: Anthracycline/dexamethasone-based induction chemotherapy, Drug: Tumor-reduction chemotherapy and stem cell mobilization, Procedure: Stem cell apheresis, Drug: Tandem high-dose chemotherapy (melphalan), Procedure: Autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantationTumor-reduction chemotherapy and stem cell mobilization Stem cell apheresis Tandem high-dose chemotherapy Autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 60 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Histological confirmed multiple myeloma stage II or III according to the classification of Salmon and Durie
- Aged between 60 and 70 years
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-2
- Signed and dated written informed consent
- No previous chemotherapy or not more than one cycle in total or previous chemotherapy of more than one cycle if paused for at least 6 months and not more than six cycles in total (arm A1 and A2 only)
Key exclusion criteria (16 listed)
- Multiple myeloma stage I according to the classification of Salmon and Durie without need of any therapy
- Aged under 60 or over 70 years
- ECOG performance status >2
- Previous chemotherapy of more than six cycles
- Informed consent missing
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Anthracycline/dexamethasone-based induction chemotherapyAlso: ID, VAD, CAD4 cycles of anthracycline/dexamethasone-based chemotherapy | Drug | A1: Induction chemotherapy, B: Observation |
| Dexamethasone for control of symptomsAlso: dexamethasone2 x 4 days of dexamethasone (day 1-4 and day 8-11: 40mg) | Drug | A2: No induction chemotherapy |
| Tumor-reduction chemotherapy and stem cell mobilizationAlso: IEV + G-CSFIfosfamide (day 1-3: 1.900mg/m² iv), epirubicin (day 1: 75 mg/m² iv), etoposide (day 1-3: 120 mg/m² iv) and G-CSF (day 5 until end of apheresis: 5µg/kg sc) | Drug | A1: Induction chemotherapy, A2: No induction chemotherapy, B: Observation |
| Stem cell apheresisAlso: SC-apheresisstem cell apheresis in peripheral blood, sought amount of CD34-cells: 6 * 10E6/kg | Procedure or surgery | A1: Induction chemotherapy, A2: No induction chemotherapy, B: Observation |
| Tandem high-dose chemotherapy (melphalan)Also: Tandem melphalanTwo cycles of high-dose melphalan (day -3 and day -2: 70mg/m²) | Drug | A1: Induction chemotherapy, A2: No induction chemotherapy, B: Observation |
| Autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantationAlso: PBSCTTwo infusions of collected stem cells (day 0: 2*10E6 CD34-cell/kg per transplantation) | Procedure or surgery | A1: Induction chemotherapy, A2: No induction chemotherapy, B: Observation |
Primary outcome
Event free survival
Time frame: From randomization to 10 years follow up
Calculated according to the method of Kaplan and Meier
5 secondary outcomes
Overall survival
Time frame: From randomization to 10 years follow up
Rate of remission (Evaluation of the overall response rate)
Time frame: After last therapy to at least 6 weeks thereafter
Quality of remission (Evaluation of the best response)
Time frame: After last therapy to at least 6 weeks thereafter
Short and long time toxicity according to NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE)
Time frame: From randomization until 2 years after last therapy
Cytogenetic examination (Univariate analysis according to the method of Kaplan and Meier. Multivariate analysis according to the method of Cox´s proportional hazards regression analysis.)
Time frame: From randomization to 10 years follow up
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 Nov 2014.
- Background: PubMed 9753033Blade J, Samson D, Reece D, Apperley J, Bjorkstrand B, Gahrton G, Gertz M, Giralt S, Jagannath S, Vesole D. Criteria for evaluating disease response and progression in patients with multiple myeloma treated by high-dose therapy and haemopoietic stem cell transplantation. Myeloma Subcommittee of the EBMT. European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplant. Br J Haematol. 1998 Sep;102(5):1115-23. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.1998.00930.x. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 2301376Alexanian R, Barlogie B, Tucker S. VAD-based regimens as primary treatment for multiple myeloma. Am J Hematol. 1990 Feb;33(2):86-9. doi: 10.1002/ajh.2830330203.
- Background: PubMed 12028028Clark AD, Douglas KW, Mitchell LD, McQuaker IG, Parker AN, Tansey PJ, Franklin IM, Cook G. Dose escalation therapy in previously untreated patients with multiple myeloma following Z-Dex induction treatment. Br J Haematol. 2002 Jun;117(3):605-12. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.2002.03519.x.
- Background: PubMed 14586157Straka C, Hebart H, Adler-Reichel S, Werding N, Emmerich B, Einsele H. Blood stem cell collections after mobilization with combination chemotherapy containing ifosfamide followed by G-CSF in multiple myeloma. Oncology. 2003;65 Suppl 2:94-8. doi: 10.1159/000073368.
- Background: PubMed 11249035Szelenyi H, Kreuser ED, Keilholz U, Menssen HD, Keitel-Wittig C, Siehl J, Knauf W, Thiel E. Cyclophosphamide, adriamycin and dexamethasone (CAD) is a highly effective therapy for patients with advanced multiple myeloma. Ann Oncol. 2001 Jan;12(1):105-8. doi: 10.1023/a:1008362107080.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 27662018Straka C, Liebisch P, Salwender H, Hennemann B, Metzner B, Knop S, Adler-Reichel S, Gerecke C, Wandt H, Bentz M, Bruemmendorf TH, Hentrich M, Pfreundschuh M, Wolf HH, Sezer O, Bargou R, Jung W, Trumper L, Hertenstein B, Heidemann E, Bernhard H, Lang N, Frickhofen N, Hebart H, Schmidmaier R, Sandermann A, Dechow T, Reichle A, Schnabel B, Schafer-Eckart K, Langer C, Gramatzki M, Hinke A, Emmerich B, Einsele H. Autotransplant with and without induction chemotherapy in older multiple myeloma patients: long-term outcome of a randomized trial. Haematologica. 2016 Nov;101(11):1398-1406. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2016.151860. Epub 2016 Aug 4.
Related trials for Multiple Myeloma
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Study of YKST02 in Adults With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma
Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM)
RecruitingPhase 2
Engaging T-cells to Eliminate MRD in Newly Diagnosed Myeloma Optimizing Response With Talquetmab and Teclistamab (ROTATE)
Multiple Myeloma
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
A Phase III Study of Eque-cel in Subjects With Len-refractory RRMM (FUMANBA-03)
Multiple Myeloma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
A Window of Opportunity Trial to Learn if Linvoseltamab is Safe and Well Tolerated, and How Well it Works in Adult Participants With Recently Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Who Have Not Already Received Treatment
Multiple Myeloma
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Testing AZD5363 as a Potential Targeted Treatment in Cancers With AKT Genetic Changes (MATCH-Subprotocol Y)
Advanced Lymphoma, Advanced Malignant Solid Neoplasm
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Christian Straka, Prof. Dr. principal investigator
Schön Klink Starnberger See
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Anthracycline/dexamethasone-based induction chemotherapy, Tumor-reduction chemotherapy and stem cell mobilization and Stem cell apheresis in people with Multiple Myeloma, run by WiSP Wissenschaftlicher Service Pharma GmbH.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 16 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Nov 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Event free survival (time frame: From randomization to 10 years follow up). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02288741, which also lists 6 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Nov 2014.