Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)STANDARDSNCT02288949
Stratification of the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
An observational study of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS), run by Hospital Universitario de Gran Canaria Doctor Negrín at 1 site in Spain.
Trial summary
The American-European Consensus Conference (AECC) and the Berlin definitions of the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) could be adequate for epidemiologic studies, but it is not adequate for inclusion of patients into therapeutic clinical trials. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)
- What is being tested?
- stratification
- How many people
- 300 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSpain
- Study dates
- Sep 2013to Jul 2015
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: All consecutive ARDS patients
Who may be able to join
- Patients meeting the AECC definition for ARDS on PEEP greater or equal than 5 cmH2O (or the Berlin criteria for moderate and severe ARDS).
Who cannot join
- None
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: STratification AND Outcome of Patients With the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
The American-European Consensus Conference (AECC) and the Berlin definitions of the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) could be adequate for epidemiologic studies, but it is not adequate for inclusion of patients into therapeutic clinical trials. Despite recent reports on the effects of standardized ventilator settings on PaO2/FIO2 and fulfillment of AECC and Berlin definitions of ARDS, it is still a matter of debate whether the assessment of hypoxemia at 24 hours is the most appropriate tool for stratifying lung severity in patients with ARDS. The investigators will perform an observational, multicenter, prospective audit in a network of intensive care units in Spain and China for validating and confirming that the assessment of hypoxemia at 24 hours after ARDS onset is the most valuable tool for stratifying and predicting outcome in patients with ARDS.
Read the detailed description
In 1994, the American-European Consensus Conference (AECC) defined ARDS as follows: 1) acute and sudden onset of severe respiratory distress, 2) bilateral infiltrates on frontal chest radiograph, 3) absence of left atrial hypertension or no clinical signs of left heart failure, and 4) severe hypoxemia, as PaO2/FiO2 ratio <200 mmHg, regardless of FIO2 or PEEP levels. Although this definition could be adequate for epidemiologic studies, it is not adequate for inclusion of patients into therapeutic clinical trials. In 2012, a proposal for updating the ARDS definition (the Berlin criteria) was published and an empirical classification was proposed according to three PaO2/FiO2 cut-off values at ARDS onset: severe (≤100 mmHg), moderate (>100-≤200), and mild (>200-≤300) on PEEP≥5 cmH2O. However, despite that there is sufficient evidence about the interactions between PEEP and FiO2, the Berlin criteria did not mandate the assessment of hypoxemia at 24 hours under standarized guidelines.
The PaO2/FIO2 can be easily manipulated. Alterations in PEEP and FIO2 can dramatically change the PaO2/FIO2. Despite recent reports on the effects of standardized ventilator settings on PaO2/FIO2 and fulfillment of AECC definitions of ARDS, it is still a matter of debate whether the assessment of hypoxemia at 24 hours is the most appropriate tool for stratifying lung severity in patients with ARDS.
The investigators will examine whether the assessment of hypoxemia at 24 h after ARDS diagnosis under standard guidelines for ventilatory management have an impact on the stratification of lung severity and on predicting mortality of ARDS patients in the intensive care unit.
- Being tested
- stratification
- Keywords
- mechanical ventilation, stratificacion, lung severity
- Medical subject headings
- Respiratory Distress Syndrome
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
stratificationOther
Patients will be stratified based on the values of relevant demographics, pulmonary and systemic variables in relation to mortality in the intensive care unit.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Prospective cohort | Stratification of patients admitted into a network of Spanish ICUs. Receives: Other: stratification |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
range of values of variables associated with the highest or lowest mortality
Measured: within the first 24 h of ARDS onset
Secondary outcomes (1)
stratification by risk of death based on variables associated with worst outcome
Measured: ICU stay
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Nov 2014 (estimated)
- Study startSep 2013
- Primary completionJul 2015
- Study completionJul 2015
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 300 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hospital Universitario de Gran Canaria Doctor Negrín
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Asociación Científica Pulmón y Ventilación Mecánica
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Jesus Villar, Hospital Universitario de Gran Canaria Doctor Negrín
- Investigators
- Jesús Villar, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Hospital Universitario Dr. Negrin
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02288949
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ACPVM-2014
- Acronym
- STANDARDS
- Status last verified
- Oct 2018
- First submitted
- 5 Nov 2014
- Last updated
- 12 Oct 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Villar J, Gonzalez-Martin JM, Ambros A, Mosteiro F, Martinez D, Fernandez L, Soler JA, Parra L, Solano R, Soro M, Del Campo R, Gonzalez-Luengo RI, Civantos B, Montiel R, Pita-Garcia L, Vidal A, Anon JM, Ferrando C, Diaz-Dominguez FJ, Mora-Ordonez JM, Fernandez MM, Fernandez C, Fernandez RL, Rodriguez-Suarez P, Steyerberg EW, Kacmarek RM; Spanish Initiative for Epidemiology, Stratification and Therapies of ARDS (SIESTA) Network. Stratification for Identification of Prognostic Categories In the Acute RESpiratory Distress Syndrome (SPIRES) Score. Crit Care Med. 2021 Oct 1;49(10):e920-e930. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005142.
PubMed 34259448Villar J, Ambros A, Mosteiro F, Martinez D, Fernandez L, Ferrando C, Carriedo D, Soler JA, Parrilla D, Hernandez M, Andaluz-Ojeda D, Anon JM, Vidal A, Gonzalez-Higueras E, Martin-Rodriguez C, Diaz-Lamas AM, Blanco J, Belda J, Diaz-Dominguez FJ, Rico-Feijoo J, Martin-Delgado C, Romera MA, Gonzalez-Martin JM, Fernandez RL, Kacmarek RM; Spanish Initiative for Epidemiology, Stratification and Therapies of ARDS (SIESTA) Network. A Prognostic Enrichment Strategy for Selection of Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Clinical Trials. Crit Care Med. 2019 Mar;47(3):377-385. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003624.
PubMed 30624279Villar J, Martinez D, Mosteiro F, Ambros A, Anon JM, Ferrando C, Soler JA, Montiel R, Vidal A, Conesa-Cayuela LA, Blanco J, Arrojo R, Solano R, Capilla L, Del Campo R, Civantos B, Fernandez MM, Aldecoa C, Parra L, Gutierrez A, Martinez-Jimenez C, Gonzalez-Martin JM, Fernandez RL, Kacmarek RM; Stratification and Outcome of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (STANDARDS) Network. Is Overall Mortality the Right Composite Endpoint in Clinical Trials of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome? Crit Care Med. 2018 Jun;46(6):892-899. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003022.
PubMed 29420341
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 Oct 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- STratification AND Outcome of Patients With the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02288949
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- STANDARDS / ACPVM-2014
- Keywords
- mechanical ventilation, stratificacion, lung severity
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 300 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Hospital Universitario de Gran Canaria Doctor NegrínUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Asociación Científica Pulmón y Ventilación Mecánica
- Study start
- Sep 2013 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Jul 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jul 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 13 Nov 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The American-European Consensus Conference (AECC) and the Berlin definitions of the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) could be adequate for epidemiologic studies, but it is not adequate for inclusion of patients into therapeutic clinical trials. Despite recent reports on the effects of standardized ventilator settings on PaO2/FIO2 and fulfillment of AECC and Berlin definitions of ARDS, it is still a matter of debate whether the assessment of hypoxemia at 24 hours is the most appropriate tool for stratifying lung severity in patients with ARDS. The investigators will perform an observational, multicenter, prospective audit in a network of intensive care units in Spain and China for validating and confirming that the assessment of hypoxemia at 24 hours after ARDS onset is the most valuable tool for stratifying and predicting outcome in patients with ARDS.
Detailed description
In 1994, the American-European Consensus Conference (AECC) defined ARDS as follows: 1) acute and sudden onset of severe respiratory distress, 2) bilateral infiltrates on frontal chest radiograph, 3) absence of left atrial hypertension or no clinical signs of left heart failure, and 4) severe hypoxemia, as PaO2/FiO2 ratio <200 mmHg, regardless of FIO2 or PEEP levels. Although this definition could be adequate for epidemiologic studies, it is not adequate for inclusion of patients into therapeutic clinical trials. In 2012, a proposal for updating the ARDS definition (the Berlin criteria) was published and an empirical classification was proposed according to three PaO2/FiO2 cut-off values at ARDS onset: severe (≤100 mmHg), moderate (>100-≤200), and mild (>200-≤300) on PEEP≥5 cmH2O. However, despite that there is sufficient evidence about the interactions between PEEP and FiO2, the Berlin criteria did not mandate the assessment of hypoxemia at 24 hours under standarized guidelines.
The PaO2/FIO2 can be easily manipulated. Alterations in PEEP and FIO2 can dramatically change the PaO2/FIO2. Despite recent reports on the effects of standardized ventilator settings on PaO2/FIO2 and fulfillment of AECC definitions of ARDS, it is still a matter of debate whether the assessment of hypoxemia at 24 hours is the most appropriate tool for stratifying lung severity in patients with ARDS.
The investigators will examine whether the assessment of hypoxemia at 24 h after ARDS diagnosis under standard guidelines for ventilatory management have an impact on the stratification of lung severity and on predicting mortality of ARDS patients in the intensive care unit.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Prospective cohort | – | Other: stratificationStratification of patients admitted into a network of Spanish ICUs. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- All consecutive ARDS patients
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patients meeting the AECC definition for ARDS on PEEP greater or equal than 5 cmH2O (or the Berlin criteria for moderate and severe ARDS).
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- None
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| stratificationPatients will be stratified based on the values of relevant demographics, pulmonary and systemic variables in relation to mortality in the intensive care unit. | Other | Prospective cohort |
Primary outcome
range of values of variables associated with the highest or lowest mortality
Time frame: within the first 24 h of ARDS onset
1 secondary outcome
stratification by risk of death based on variables associated with worst outcome
Time frame: ICU stay
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 Oct 2018.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34259448Villar J, Gonzalez-Martin JM, Ambros A, Mosteiro F, Martinez D, Fernandez L, Soler JA, Parra L, Solano R, Soro M, Del Campo R, Gonzalez-Luengo RI, Civantos B, Montiel R, Pita-Garcia L, Vidal A, Anon JM, Ferrando C, Diaz-Dominguez FJ, Mora-Ordonez JM, Fernandez MM, Fernandez C, Fernandez RL, Rodriguez-Suarez P, Steyerberg EW, Kacmarek RM; Spanish Initiative for Epidemiology, Stratification and Therapies of ARDS (SIESTA) Network. Stratification for Identification of Prognostic Categories In the Acute RESpiratory Distress Syndrome (SPIRES) Score. Crit Care Med. 2021 Oct 1;49(10):e920-e930. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005142.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 30624279Villar J, Ambros A, Mosteiro F, Martinez D, Fernandez L, Ferrando C, Carriedo D, Soler JA, Parrilla D, Hernandez M, Andaluz-Ojeda D, Anon JM, Vidal A, Gonzalez-Higueras E, Martin-Rodriguez C, Diaz-Lamas AM, Blanco J, Belda J, Diaz-Dominguez FJ, Rico-Feijoo J, Martin-Delgado C, Romera MA, Gonzalez-Martin JM, Fernandez RL, Kacmarek RM; Spanish Initiative for Epidemiology, Stratification and Therapies of ARDS (SIESTA) Network. A Prognostic Enrichment Strategy for Selection of Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Clinical Trials. Crit Care Med. 2019 Mar;47(3):377-385. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003624.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 29420341Villar J, Martinez D, Mosteiro F, Ambros A, Anon JM, Ferrando C, Soler JA, Montiel R, Vidal A, Conesa-Cayuela LA, Blanco J, Arrojo R, Solano R, Capilla L, Del Campo R, Civantos B, Fernandez MM, Aldecoa C, Parra L, Gutierrez A, Martinez-Jimenez C, Gonzalez-Martin JM, Fernandez RL, Kacmarek RM; Stratification and Outcome of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (STANDARDS) Network. Is Overall Mortality the Right Composite Endpoint in Clinical Trials of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome? Crit Care Med. 2018 Jun;46(6):892-899. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003022.
Related trials for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)
Enrolling by invitation
Personalized Ventilator Settings for Patients on ECMO
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS), Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation
Recruiting
WIN Ratio Analysis to Determine a Strategy of Non- Invasive SUpport for Respiratory Failure in the EmeRgency Department
Acute Hypoxic Respiratory Failure, Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)
RecruitingObservational study
Pulse Wave vs. Saline Contrast EIT for Pulmonary Perfusion in ARDS
ARDS (Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome), Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT)
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Early Switch in Moderate ARDS
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Fostamatinib for Treating Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) in Hospitalized Adults
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, ARDS
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jesús Villar, MD, PhD principal investigator
Hospital Universitario Dr. Negrin
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS), run by Hospital Universitario de Gran Canaria Doctor Negrín at 1 site in Spain.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Oct 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
range of values of variables associated with the highest or lowest mortality (time frame: within the first 24 h of ARDS onset). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02288949, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Oct 2018; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 8 Nov 2026.