Cardiac ArrestEMSNCT02291653
Pediatric Endotracheal Intubation
A study testing McGrath and MIL in people with Cardiac Arrest and Intubation, Endotracheal, run by International Institute of Rescue Research and Education at 1 site in Poland.
Trial summary
We hypothesized that the McGrath MAC EMS is beneficial for intubation of pediatric manikins while performing CPR. In the current study, we compared effectiveness of the McGrath MAC EMS and MIL laryngoscopes in child resuscitation with and without CC. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Cardiac Arrest, Intubation, Endotracheal
- What is being tested?
- McGrath and MIL
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 87 participants
- Where
- 1 sitePoland
- Study dates
- Nov 2014to Dec 2014
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Give voluntary consent to participate in the study
- paramedic student
Who cannot join
- Not meet the above criteria
- Wrist or Low back diseases
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Poland1 site
International Institute of Rescue Research and Education
Warsaw, Masovia, 03-122
About this study
Official title: Comparing the Novel McGrath MAC EMS Videolaryngoscope With Conventional Direct Laryngoscopy During Child Resuscitation: a Randomized Crossover Mannequin Study of Paramedic Students
We hypothesized that the McGrath MAC EMS is beneficial for intubation of pediatric manikins while performing CPR. In the current study, we compared effectiveness of the McGrath MAC EMS and MIL laryngoscopes in child resuscitation with and without CC.
- Conditions
- Cardiac Arrest, Intubation, Endotracheal
- Being tested
- McGrath, MIL
- Medical subject headings
- Heart Arrest
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
McGrathDevice
Also called McGrath MAC EMS
video-laryngoscopy
MILDevice
Also called Miller Laryngoscope
direct-laryngoscopy
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intubation without chest compressions | Experimental | Endotracheal intubation of pediatric mannikin during resuscitation without chest compressions. Receives: Device: McGrath; Device: MIL |
| Intubation with uninterrupted chest compressions | Experimental | Endotracheal intubation of pediatric mannikin during resuscitation with uninterrupted chest compressions. In order to simulate the difficulties associated with intubation during uninterrupted chest compressions, CPR was performed by using LUCAS-2 (Physio-Control, Redmond, WA, U.S.). Receives: Device: McGrath; Device: MIL |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Success of intubation
effectiveness of first, second and third intubation attempts and overall effectiveness of intubation by participants
Measured: 1 day
Secondary outcomes (2)
Intubation time
time in seconds required for a successful intubation attempt
Measured: 1 day
Cormack-Lehane grading
self-reported percentage the vocal cord visualization using the Cormack-Lehane grading (grade 1-4)
Measured: 1 day
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted14 Nov 2014 (estimated)
- Study startNov 2014
- Primary completionDec 2014
- Study completionDec 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Cardiac ArrestStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 87 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- International Institute of Rescue Research and Education
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Lukasz Szarpak, National Institute of Cardiology, Warsaw, Poland
- Investigators
- Lukasz Szarpak, Principal investigator, Institute of Cardiology
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02291653
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ETI/2014/17
- Acronym
- EMS
- Status last verified
- Dec 2014
- First submitted
- 11 Nov 2014
- Last updated
- 5 Dec 2014
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Dec 2014. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparing the Novel McGrath MAC EMS Videolaryngoscope With Conventional Direct Laryngoscopy During Child Resuscitation: a Randomized Crossover Mannequin Study of Paramedic Students
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02291653
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- EMS / ETI/2014/17
- Conditions
- Cardiac Arrest, Intubation, Endotracheal
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 87 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- International Institute of Rescue Research and EducationUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Nov 2014
- Primary completion
- Dec 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 14 Nov 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
We hypothesized that the McGrath MAC EMS is beneficial for intubation of pediatric manikins while performing CPR. In the current study, we compared effectiveness of the McGrath MAC EMS and MIL laryngoscopes in child resuscitation with and without CC.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intubation without chest compressions | Experimental | Device: McGrath, Device: MILEndotracheal intubation of pediatric mannikin during resuscitation without chest compressions. |
| Intubation with uninterrupted chest compressions | Experimental | Device: McGrath, Device: MILEndotracheal intubation of pediatric mannikin during resuscitation with uninterrupted chest compressions. In order to simulate the difficulties associated with intubation during uninterrupted chest compressions, CPR was performed by using LUCAS-2 (Physio-Control, Redmond, WA, U.S.). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Give voluntary consent to participate in the study
- paramedic student
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Not meet the above criteria
- Wrist or Low back diseases
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| McGrathAlso: McGrath MAC EMSvideo-laryngoscopy | Device | Intubation with uninterrupted chest compressions, Intubation without chest compressions |
| MILAlso: Miller Laryngoscopedirect-laryngoscopy | Device | Intubation with uninterrupted chest compressions, Intubation without chest compressions |
Primary outcome
Success of intubation
Time frame: 1 day
effectiveness of first, second and third intubation attempts and overall effectiveness of intubation by participants
2 secondary outcomes
Intubation time
Time frame: 1 day
Cormack-Lehane grading
Time frame: 1 day
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Dec 2014.
Related trials for Cardiac Arrest
Active, not recruiting
RACE-CARS - RAndomized Cluster Evaluation of Cardiac ARrest Systems
Cardiac Arrest
Not yet recruiting
Generative AI and Gamified Simulation-Based Train-the-Trainer Basic Life Support Training for High School Teachers in Vietnam
Cardiac Arrest, Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
RecruitingObservational study
Cardiac Arrest - Ultrasound Detection of Occult Perfusion
Cardiac Arrest, Out-Of-Hospital, Hypotension
Not yet recruiting
The OXY-VENT Study
Cardiac Arrest (CA), Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR)
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Therapeutic Outcomes of In-Hospital Resuscitation of Patients Admitted to the Internal Medicine Wards
Survival to Discharge With Good Neurologic Outcome Among in Hospital Cardiac Arrest Patients
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Lukasz Szarpak principal investigator
Institute of Cardiology
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing McGrath and MIL in people with Cardiac Arrest and Intubation, Endotracheal, run by International Institute of Rescue Research and Education at 1 site in Poland.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Dec 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Poland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Success of intubation (time frame: 1 day). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Dec 2014.