AzTrials
AzTrials

RhinoconjunctivitisNCT02292875

ToleroMune Grass Follow on Study

An observational study of Rhinoconjunctivitis and Grass Allergy, run by Circassia Limited at 2 sites in Canada.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Grass pollen allergens are recognised as a major cause of allergic diseases in humans and animals. Worldwide, at least 40% of allergic patients are sensitised to grass pollen allergens and between 50-90% of hayfever or seasonal allergy sufferers are allergic to grass pollen. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 years
Conditions the study is for
Rhinoconjunctivitis, Grass Allergy
How many people
84 participants
Where
2 sitesCanada
Study dates
Apr 2014to Sep 2014
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Subject previously randomised in study TG002 and completed all dosing visits and the PTC

Who may be able to join

  • Previously randomised into study TG002, and completed all treatment visits and PTC during calendar year 2012

Who cannot join

  • "Partly controlled" and "uncontrolled" asthama
  • History of anaphylaxis to grass allergen
  • FEV1 <80% of predicted
  • Treatment with beta-blockers, alpha-adrenoreceptor blockers, tranquilizers or psychoactuve drugs
  • Symptoms of a clinically relevant illness
  • Subjects who cannot tolerate allergen challenge in the EEU

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

Canada2 sites
  • Study site

    Kanata, Ontario

  • Study site

    Kingston, Ontario

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: An Optional Follow-Up Study to Evaluate the Continued Efficacy of ToleroMune Grass in Grass Allergic Subjects Following Challenge With Grass Allergen in an Environmental Exposure Unit.

Grass pollen allergens are recognised as a major cause of allergic diseases in humans and animals. Worldwide, at least 40% of allergic patients are sensitised to grass pollen allergens and between 50-90% of hayfever or seasonal allergy sufferers are allergic to grass pollen. ToleroMune Grass is a novel, synthetic, allergen-derived peptide desensitising vaccine, currently being developed for the treatment of grass allergy.

The purpose of this optional observational follow-on study is to further evaluate rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms on exposure to Grass in the EEU among subjects who completed all dosing visits in study TG002 approximately two years after the start of treatment.

Read the detailed description

This is a follow-up study to a multi-centre, randomised, double-blind, placebo controlled, parallel group clinical study (TG002) which evaluated the efficacy, safety and tolerability of three doses of ToleroMune Grass versus placebo in grass allergic subjects. Subjects who completed TG002 in calendar year 2012 will undergo a further single exposure to grass allergens in an EEU.

Keywords
Grass Allergy, Rhinoconjunctivitis, Environmental Exposure Unit, Immunotherapy, ToleroMune Grass

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT02292875
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
TG002 SubjectsSubjects previously randomised in study TG002

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Total Rhinoconjunctivitis Symptom Scores

    Measured: 32 months post first dose in TG002

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Grass Specific Immunoglobulin A (IgA)

    Measured: 32 months post first dose in TG002

  2. Grass Specific Immunoglobulin E (IgE)

    Measured: 32 months post first dose in TG002

  3. Grass Specific Immunoglobulin G Isotype 4 (IgG4)

    Measured: 32 months post first dose in TG002

  4. Skin Prick Weal Diameter

    Measured: 32 months post first dose in TG002

  5. Adverse Events

    Measured: 32 months post first dose in TG002

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted17 Nov 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study startApr 2014
  3. Primary completionSep 2014
  4. Study completionSep 2014

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
84 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02292875
Sponsor's protocol ID
TG002B
Status last verified
Nov 2014
First submitted
13 Nov 2014
Last updated
17 Nov 2014
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Ellis AK, Frankish CW, Armstrong K, Steacy L, Tenn MW, Pawsey S, Hafner RP. Persistence of the clinical effect of grass allergen peptide immunotherapy after the second and third grass pollen seasons. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2020 Feb;145(2):610-618.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2019.09.010. Epub 2019 Sep 27.

    PubMed 31568796

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Rhinoconjunctivitis and Grass Allergy, run by Circassia Limited at 2 sites in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Nov 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Total Rhinoconjunctivitis Symptom Scores (time frame: 32 months post first dose in TG002). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02292875, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Nov 2014.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in