Aortic AneurysmT-PASSNCT02292927
Trimodal Prehabilitation for Aneurysm Surgery Study
A study testing Post-intervention arm = Prehabilitation in people with Aortic Aneurysm, run by Imperial College London.
Trial summary
DESIGN: Single-centre, feasibility study AIMS: The aim of this study is to evaluate the acceptability and pre-operative impact on functional capacity of a trimodal prehabilitation program in a cohort of patients undergoing aneurysm repair. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 40 to 95 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Aortic Aneurysm
- What is being tested?
- Post-intervention arm = Prehabilitation
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 25 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Nov 2014to Dec 2015
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 40 to 95 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- patients undergoing elective repair, willing/able to undertake a period of prehabilitation, and those able to comprehend and retain instructions regarding self-training.
Who cannot join
- Symptomatic patients or those undergoing urgent treatment (< 2 weeks)
About this study
Official title: Maximising Recovery to Health Through Trimodal (Bio Psycho Social) Prehabilitation for Aneurysm Surgery Study
DESIGN: Single-centre, feasibility study AIMS: The aim of this study is to evaluate the acceptability and pre-operative impact on functional capacity of a trimodal prehabilitation program in a cohort of patients undergoing aneurysm repair.
This will enable the design (feasibility and power) of a large scale Randomised Controlled Trial.
Read more
Expected outcomes
- The potential number of patients who would benefit, the compliance and acceptability of a pre-operative prehabilitation programme will be calculated.
- Preoperatively, expected at 6-weeks, the change in physical fitness of patients (assessed by the physical function section of SF-36 and measured with peak flow/6-minute walk testing) during the pre-operative phase will be assessed in both groups.
- The effects on quality of life, anxiety and depression on each study participant will be assessed immediately pre-op, expected at 6-weeks.
- The number of patients who are able to reduce or cease smoking will be reported during the pre-op phase (expected at 6 weeks), as will length of hospital stay after aortic surgery, expected at 6-8 weeks.
POPULATION: Patients undergoing planned elective aortic surgery procedures
ELIGIBILITY: Adult patients (over 18 years) undergoing elective open and endovascular aneurysm repair with capacity to consent and physical fitness to undergo an pre-operative exercise programme DURATION: 1 year from 1st June 2014
Read the detailed description
Proposed intervention - The introduction of a biopsychosocial intervention before surgery. The physical exercise programme will be a prescribed exercise training twice per week which will be supported by a physical therapist and vascular nurse specialist. A trained clinical psychologist will also deliver a brief psychological intervention based on cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) techniques in two sessions to modify illness, surgical preparation and rehabilitation beliefs. Lastly patients will be counselled and referred to smoking cessation services as appropriate by the vascular nurse specialist.
Baseline information will include patient demographics and medical history, quality of life assessment using SF-36 forms, hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS) and exercise testing by a standardised 6-minute walk test Information immediately pre-operatively will be collected to include a repeat assessment of physical function with a 6-minute walk test, SF-36 assessment and HADS scores. Smoking cessation rate will be collected.
A pre and post-intervention group will be studied over a 1-year period. We will report on the eligibility, acceptability and pre-operative effect of this trimodal rehabilitation programme.
AIM AND EXPECTED IMPACT
This is a non-randomised pre-post intervention pilot study to understand the acceptability and pre-operative effects of a combined physical, psychological and social prehabilitation package in patients undergoing aneurysm repair. This will enable the design (feasibility and power) of a large scale Randomised Controlled Trial.
Our hypotheses include:
- The introduction of a prehabilitation programme will be acceptable to the majority of patients undergoing aneurysm surgery
- A physical pre-operative exercise programme will increase physical fitness before surgery
- A psychological intervention based on cognitive behaviour therapy techniques will reduce anxiety before surgery and prepare patients better for their post-operative recovery
- The introduction of psycho-social counselling for smoking cessation will encourage more patients to give up smoking pre-operatively
PARTICIPANT ENTRY: PATIENTS
PRE-REGISTRATION EVALUATIONS The research team will identify eligible patients for recruitment into the study via clinic lists, multidisciplinary meetings and referral letters before the patient attends their clinic appointment. Only adult patients undergoing aortic surgery will be selected. Patient information leaflets will be given to selected patients and patients will be given the opportunity to read them and ask questions before deciding whether or not to participate.
INCLUSION CRITERIA
- Adult patients (>18 years old) undergoing aortic aneurysm repair.
- Ability to comprehend and retain instructions regarding self-training
- Physical fitness allowing participation in an exercise programme.
EXCLUSION CRITERIA
- Minors (<18 years old)
- Adult patients who do not have capacity to consent.
- Emergency or urgent procedures who will not have a necessary 6 week lead in time until operation.
WITHDRAWRAL CRITERIA The patient will be made aware that they may withdraw from the study at any time without providing a reason; their care and treatment will not be affected
STUDY DESIGN The acceptability of this programme will be studied and the pre-operative impact on functional capacity will be assessed in a comparator (pre-intervention) and post-intervention group.
Patients
Patients from Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust Vascular Unit undergoing aortic aneurysm repair will be recruited.
Study Protocol
Our current vascular pre-operative assessment service is an established nurse led service, run by a dedicated aortic clinical nurse specialist. The prehabilitation would run in conjunction with the current pre-operative screening measures currently in place - which include dobutamine stress echocardiography, renal assessment and pulmonary function tests.
-Phase 1 - Comparator (pre-intervention) evaluation
Patients undergoing present standard of care - i.e. standard work-up for aneurysm repair without nurse-led prehabilitation strategy, who meet inclusion and exclusion criteria will be given a patient information leaflet, informed they are in the pre-intervention group and consented for inclusion in the study as detailed above.
At the baseline appointment, on the same day as work-up tests, information will be collected on standardised data collection sheets to include:
- Patient demographics and medical history
- Baseline Quality of Life assessment using SF-36 forms
- Hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS).
- Exercise testing by a standardised 6-minute walk test
- Peak Expiratory Flow Rate (PEFR)
Information immediately pre-operatively will be collected the day before operation (our standard admission is the day before) to include a repeat assessment of physical function with a 6-minute walk test, Peak Expiratory Flow Rate (PEFR), SF-36 assessment and HADS scores. Smoking cessation rate over the pre-operative period will be collected. The aneurysm repair will proceed as standard of care, and will be unchanged from standard practice.
-Phase 2 - Intervention
Proposed intervention - The introduction of a biopsychosocial intervention before surgery. The physical exercise programme will be prescribed exercise training twice per week which will be supported by our vascular nurse specialist, previously shown to have a small effect on length of stay in cardiac patients [12].
A trained specialist (a registered psychologist) will also deliver a brief psychological intervention based on cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) techniques in two sessions to modify illness, surgical preparation and rehabilitation beliefs. This psychological intervention has been shown to be effective in encouraging claudicants to initiate and continue exercise training [13].
Lastly patients will be counselled and referred to smoking cessation services as appropriate.
Phase 2 protocol - During an initial set-up phase comprehensive information booklets will be developed to instruct the patient on these three modes of prehabilitation.
Patients who are eligible for the study will be approached in the same way as patients studied in the comparator group. At the baseline study visit, the same baseline information will be collected as for the comparator group i.e.:
At the baseline appointment, on the same day as work-up tests, information will be collected on standardised data collection sheets to include:
- Patient demographics and medical history
- Baseline Quality of Life assessment using SF-36 forms
- Hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS).
- Exercise testing by a standardised 6-minute walk test
- Peak Expiratory Flow Rate (PEFR)
In addition patients will receive:
- Information booklets
- Physical exercise plan, run-through and explanations.
- Psychological therapy on this day or a mutually convenient day for patient and therapist.
- Counselling by the nurse specialist and referral for smoking cessation
Patients will receive a telephone follow-up with the nurse specialist at week 2 and week 4 to evaluate progress and to encourage compliance with the programme. Between weeks 5-6 the patient will have a further session with the clinical psychologist, just prior to admission for treatment, to prepare them for their impending hospitalisation.
Again, information immediately pre-operatively will be collected to include a repeat assessment of physical function with a 6-minute walk test, Peak Expiratory Flow Rate (PEFR), SF-36 assessment and HADS score. In addition, patients will be asked to fill out a questionnaire assessing compliance with and acceptability of the prehabilitation programme. Smoking cessation rate will be collected.
Data Collection
The following demographic data will be recorded on standardised data collection forms for each patient, collected from patient records and the patient interviews:
- Inclusion and exclusion criteria
- Medical history/risk factors
- ASA classification
- Planned operative procedure details
- Physical status using functional capacity, measured in metabolic equivalents (METs), with a Duke Activity Status Index (score of less than 4 indicates poor physical function).
Functional capacity may be usually expressed in metabolic equivalents (METs), where one MET is defined as the oxygen consumption of a 70-kg man at rest. Greater than 7 METs of activity tolerance is considered excellent, whereas less than 4 METs is considered poor activity tolerance.
The Duke Activity Status Index suggests questions that correlate with MET levels; for example, walking on level ground at about 4 miles per hour or carrying a bag of groceries up a flight of stairs expends approximately 4 METs of activity. This system is used by the Cleveland clinic for pre-operative cardiac evaluation. It allows a pre-operative assessment of physical function to assess predicted ability to cope at home after surgery. A brief, self-completed questionnaire (Appendix 1) can provide a standardized assessment of functional status that correlates well with an objective measure of maximal exercise capacity [14].
Post-operative data will be collected for patients in order to plan for a further study based on reducing length of stay.
- Inpatient complications: grade and details using standardised data collection sheets
- Length of stay
- HDU/ITU use
- Mortality
At base line visit and prior to operation each patient will be assessed using:
- Baseline Quality of Life assessment using SF-36 forms
- Hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS).
- Exercise testing by a standardised 6-minute walk test
- Peak Expiratory Flow Rate (PEFR)
An event log will be recorded for each patient throughout the study period.
Patients undergoing intervention will be asked to complete a short questionnaire on compliance and acceptability of the prehabilitation programme.
ANALYSIS Completed data collection sheets will be analysed for omissions and missing data completed before being logged onto a central database and analysed by the research team at Imperial College, London, St. Mary's Campus.
The two groups will be compared using simple statistical methods. We intend to analyse and report on the following
- The number of patients who accepted inclusion into a pre-operative prehabilitation programme will be calculated.
- The change in physical fitness of patients (assessed by the physical function section of SF-36 and measured with peak flow/6-minute walk testing) during the pre-operative phase will be assessed pre and post-intervention groups.
- The effects on quality of life.
- The effect of a programme on anxiety and depression on each study participant will be assessed.
- The number of patients who are able to reduce or cease smoking will be reported.
- Compliance and acceptability of the prehabilitation programme.
- Morbidity and Mortality, HDU/ITU resource use as well as Length of hospital stay after aortic surgery.
- Conditions
- Aortic Aneurysm
- Being tested
- Post-intervention arm = Prehabilitation
- Medical subject headings
- Aortic Aneurysm
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Post-intervention arm = PrehabilitationBehavioural
Introduction of a physical exercise training programme, psychological counselling and smoking cessation advice
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Pre-intervention | No intervention | Patients treated as standard before intervention |
| Post-intervention arm = Prehabilitation | Active comparator | Introduction of rehabilitation program Receives: Behavioral: Post-intervention arm = Prehabilitation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The Number of Patients Who Accepted Inclusion Into a Pre-operative Prehabilitation Programme
This describes the number of people within the study who were in the pre-habilitation study arm that accepted and completed the pre-habilitation training
Measured: Collected at screening
Change From Baseline in Metabolic Equivalents (METS) at Six Weeks
- Metabolic equivalent level is a measure of physical fitness. One MET is defined as 3.5 mL 02 uptake/kg per minute which is the resting oxygen uptake in a sitting position. The achieved exercise capacity in METs has been shown to be predictive in older adult population of survival with higher MET levels associated with improved survival," or similar definition that is accurate and appropriate.
Measured: Collected at baseline and (expected) 6 weeks
Decrease in Anxiety and Depression Scores (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale)
HADS is a validated questionnaire consisting of 7 statements relating to anxiety and 7 statements relating to depression. Each statement is scored between 0 and 3 giving a total score of up to 21 for each section. A score of 0-7 is assumed to be normal and score greater than this suggestive of a mood disorder
Measured: Collected at baseline and (expected) 6 weeks
Number of Participants With Attendance at the Physical and Psychological and Social Training Appointments of the Rehabilitation Programme (Assessed by Bespoke Questionnaire)
Measured: Collected at baseline and during the study
Secondary outcomes (2)
HDU/ITU Resource Use (Number of Days Stay)
Observation to power a larger intervention study
Measured: Collected at (expected) 6 weeks +hospital stay
LOS
Length of hospital stay after aortic surgery (number of days) - Observation to power a larger intervention study
Measured: Collected at (expected) 6 weeks +hospital stay
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Nov 2014 (estimated)
- Study startNov 2014
- Primary completionDec 2015
- Study completionDec 2015
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (14)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Aortic AneurysmStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Imperial College LondonThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 25 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Imperial College London
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02292927
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 14/LO/1368
- Acronym
- T-PASS
- Status last verified
- May 2019
- First submitted
- 6 Nov 2014
- Last updated
- 17 Jul 2019
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: This trial did not complete as expected and therefore there are no meaningful participant data to share.
Publications
Rooks DS, Huang J, Bierbaum BE, Bolus SA, Rubano J, Connolly CE, Alpert S, Iversen MD, Katz JN. Effect of preoperative exercise on measures of functional status in men and women undergoing total hip and knee arthroplasty. Arthritis Rheum. 2006 Oct 15;55(5):700-8. doi: 10.1002/art.22223.
PubMed 17013852Mayo NE, Feldman L, Scott S, Zavorsky G, Kim DJ, Charlebois P, Stein B, Carli F. Impact of preoperative change in physical function on postoperative recovery: argument supporting prehabilitation for colorectal surgery. Surgery. 2011 Sep;150(3):505-14. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2011.07.045.
PubMed 21878237Kim DJ, Mayo NE, Carli F, Montgomery DL, Zavorsky GS. Responsive measures to prehabilitation in patients undergoing bowel resection surgery. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2009 Feb;217(2):109-15. doi: 10.1620/tjem.217.109.
PubMed 19212103Li C, Carli F, Lee L, Charlebois P, Stein B, Liberman AS, Kaneva P, Augustin B, Wongyingsinn M, Gamsa A, Kim DJ, Vassiliou MC, Feldman LS. Impact of a trimodal prehabilitation program on functional recovery after colorectal cancer surgery: a pilot study. Surg Endosc. 2013 Apr;27(4):1072-82. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2560-5. Epub 2012 Oct 9.
PubMed 23052535Carli F, Charlebois P, Stein B, Feldman L, Zavorsky G, Kim DJ, Scott S, Mayo NE. Randomized clinical trial of prehabilitation in colorectal surgery. Br J Surg. 2010 Aug;97(8):1187-97. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7102.
PubMed 20602503Dunckley M, Ellard D, Quinn T, Barlow J. Coronary artery bypass grafting: patients' and health professionals' views of recovery after hospital discharge. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2008 Mar;7(1):36-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcnurse.2007.06.001. Epub 2007 Jul 23.
PubMed 17644041Kiecolt-Glaser JK, Page GG, Marucha PT, MacCallum RC, Glaser R. Psychological influences on surgical recovery. Perspectives from psychoneuroimmunology. Am Psychol. 1998 Nov;53(11):1209-18. doi: 10.1037//0003-066x.53.11.1209.
PubMed 9830373Devine EC. Effects of psychoeducational care for adult surgical patients: a meta-analysis of 191 studies. Patient Educ Couns. 1992 Apr;19(2):129-42. doi: 10.1016/0738-3991(92)90193-m.
PubMed 1299818Mumford E, Schlesinger HJ, Glass GV. The effect of psychological intervention on recovery from surgery and heart attacks: an analysis of the literature. Am J Public Health. 1982 Feb;72(2):141-51. doi: 10.2105/ajph.72.2.141.
PubMed 7055315Furze G, Dumville JC, Miles JN, Irvine K, Thompson DR, Lewin RJ. "Prehabilitation" prior to CABG surgery improves physical functioning and depression. Int J Cardiol. 2009 Feb 6;132(1):51-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2008.06.001. Epub 2008 Aug 15.
PubMed 18703241Owen D, Bicknell C, Hilton C, Lind J, Jalloh I, Owen M, Harrison R. Preoperative smoking cessation: a questionnaire study. Int J Clin Pract. 2007 Dec;61(12):2002-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2007.01565..x. Epub 2007 Sep 10.
PubMed 17850308Arthur HM, Daniels C, McKelvie R, Hirsh J, Rush B. Effect of a preoperative intervention on preoperative and postoperative outcomes in low-risk patients awaiting elective coronary artery bypass graft surgery. A randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 2000 Aug 15;133(4):253-62. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-133-4-200008150-00007.
PubMed 10929164Cunningham MA, Swanson V, O'Carroll RE, Holdsworth RJ. Randomized clinical trial of a brief psychological intervention to increase walking in patients with intermittent claudication. Br J Surg. 2012 Jan;99(1):49-56. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7714. Epub 2011 Oct 28.
PubMed 22038532Hlatky MA, Boineau RE, Higginbotham MB, Lee KL, Mark DB, Califf RM, Cobb FR, Pryor DB. A brief self-administered questionnaire to determine functional capacity (the Duke Activity Status Index). Am J Cardiol. 1989 Sep 15;64(10):651-4. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(89)90496-7.
PubMed 2782256
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Jul 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Maximising Recovery to Health Through Trimodal (Bio Psycho Social) Prehabilitation for Aneurysm Surgery Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02292927
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- T-PASS / 14/LO/1368
- Conditions
- Aortic Aneurysm
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 25 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Imperial College LondonUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Nov 2014
- Primary completion
- Dec 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 18 Nov 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 17 Jul 2019
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
DESIGN: Single-centre, feasibility study AIMS: The aim of this study is to evaluate the acceptability and pre-operative impact on functional capacity of a trimodal prehabilitation program in a cohort of patients undergoing aneurysm repair.
This will enable the design (feasibility and power) of a large scale Randomised Controlled Trial.
Expected outcomes
- The potential number of patients who would benefit, the compliance and acceptability of a pre-operative prehabilitation programme will be calculated.
- Preoperatively, expected at 6-weeks, the change in physical fitness of patients (assessed by the physical function section of SF-36 and measured with peak flow/6-minute walk testing) during the pre-operative phase will be assessed in both groups.
- The effects on quality of life, anxiety and depression on each study participant will be assessed immediately pre-op, expected at 6-weeks.
- The number of patients who are able to reduce or cease smoking will be reported during the pre-op phase (expected at 6 weeks), as will length of hospital stay after aortic surgery, expected at 6-8 weeks.
POPULATION: Patients undergoing planned elective aortic surgery procedures
ELIGIBILITY: Adult patients (over 18 years) undergoing elective open and endovascular aneurysm repair with capacity to consent and physical fitness to undergo an pre-operative exercise programme DURATION: 1 year from 1st June 2014
Detailed description
Proposed intervention - The introduction of a biopsychosocial intervention before surgery. The physical exercise programme will be a prescribed exercise training twice per week which will be supported by a physical therapist and vascular nurse specialist. A trained clinical psychologist will also deliver a brief psychological intervention based on cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) techniques in two sessions to modify illness, surgical preparation and rehabilitation beliefs. Lastly patients will be counselled and referred to smoking cessation services as appropriate by the vascular nurse specialist.
Baseline information will include patient demographics and medical history, quality of life assessment using SF-36 forms, hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS) and exercise testing by a standardised 6-minute walk test Information immediately pre-operatively will be collected to include a repeat assessment of physical function with a 6-minute walk test, SF-36 assessment and HADS scores. Smoking cessation rate will be collected.
A pre and post-intervention group will be studied over a 1-year period. We will report on the eligibility, acceptability and pre-operative effect of this trimodal rehabilitation programme.
AIM AND EXPECTED IMPACT
This is a non-randomised pre-post intervention pilot study to understand the acceptability and pre-operative effects of a combined physical, psychological and social prehabilitation package in patients undergoing aneurysm repair. This will enable the design (feasibility and power) of a large scale Randomised Controlled Trial.
Our hypotheses include:
- The introduction of a prehabilitation programme will be acceptable to the majority of patients undergoing aneurysm surgery
- A physical pre-operative exercise programme will increase physical fitness before surgery
- A psychological intervention based on cognitive behaviour therapy techniques will reduce anxiety before surgery and prepare patients better for their post-operative recovery
- The introduction of psycho-social counselling for smoking cessation will encourage more patients to give up smoking pre-operatively
PARTICIPANT ENTRY: PATIENTS
PRE-REGISTRATION EVALUATIONS The research team will identify eligible patients for recruitment into the study via clinic lists, multidisciplinary meetings and referral letters before the patient attends their clinic appointment. Only adult patients undergoing aortic surgery will be selected. Patient information leaflets will be given to selected patients and patients will be given the opportunity to read them and ask questions before deciding whether or not to participate.
INCLUSION CRITERIA
- Adult patients (>18 years old) undergoing aortic aneurysm repair.
- Ability to comprehend and retain instructions regarding self-training
- Physical fitness allowing participation in an exercise programme.
EXCLUSION CRITERIA
- Minors (<18 years old)
- Adult patients who do not have capacity to consent.
- Emergency or urgent procedures who will not have a necessary 6 week lead in time until operation.
WITHDRAWRAL CRITERIA The patient will be made aware that they may withdraw from the study at any time without providing a reason; their care and treatment will not be affected
STUDY DESIGN The acceptability of this programme will be studied and the pre-operative impact on functional capacity will be assessed in a comparator (pre-intervention) and post-intervention group.
Patients
Patients from Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust Vascular Unit undergoing aortic aneurysm repair will be recruited.
Study Protocol
Our current vascular pre-operative assessment service is an established nurse led service, run by a dedicated aortic clinical nurse specialist. The prehabilitation would run in conjunction with the current pre-operative screening measures currently in place - which include dobutamine stress echocardiography, renal assessment and pulmonary function tests.
-Phase 1 - Comparator (pre-intervention) evaluation
Patients undergoing present standard of care - i.e. standard work-up for aneurysm repair without nurse-led prehabilitation strategy, who meet inclusion and exclusion criteria will be given a patient information leaflet, informed they are in the pre-intervention group and consented for inclusion in the study as detailed above.
At the baseline appointment, on the same day as work-up tests, information will be collected on standardised data collection sheets to include:
- Patient demographics and medical history
- Baseline Quality of Life assessment using SF-36 forms
- Hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS).
- Exercise testing by a standardised 6-minute walk test
- Peak Expiratory Flow Rate (PEFR)
Information immediately pre-operatively will be collected the day before operation (our standard admission is the day before) to include a repeat assessment of physical function with a 6-minute walk test, Peak Expiratory Flow Rate (PEFR), SF-36 assessment and HADS scores. Smoking cessation rate over the pre-operative period will be collected. The aneurysm repair will proceed as standard of care, and will be unchanged from standard practice.
-Phase 2 - Intervention
Proposed intervention - The introduction of a biopsychosocial intervention before surgery. The physical exercise programme will be prescribed exercise training twice per week which will be supported by our vascular nurse specialist, previously shown to have a small effect on length of stay in cardiac patients [12].
A trained specialist (a registered psychologist) will also deliver a brief psychological intervention based on cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) techniques in two sessions to modify illness, surgical preparation and rehabilitation beliefs. This psychological intervention has been shown to be effective in encouraging claudicants to initiate and continue exercise training [13].
Lastly patients will be counselled and referred to smoking cessation services as appropriate.
Phase 2 protocol - During an initial set-up phase comprehensive information booklets will be developed to instruct the patient on these three modes of prehabilitation.
Patients who are eligible for the study will be approached in the same way as patients studied in the comparator group. At the baseline study visit, the same baseline information will be collected as for the comparator group i.e.:
At the baseline appointment, on the same day as work-up tests, information will be collected on standardised data collection sheets to include:
- Patient demographics and medical history
- Baseline Quality of Life assessment using SF-36 forms
- Hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS).
- Exercise testing by a standardised 6-minute walk test
- Peak Expiratory Flow Rate (PEFR)
In addition patients will receive:
- Information booklets
- Physical exercise plan, run-through and explanations.
- Psychological therapy on this day or a mutually convenient day for patient and therapist.
- Counselling by the nurse specialist and referral for smoking cessation
Patients will receive a telephone follow-up with the nurse specialist at week 2 and week 4 to evaluate progress and to encourage compliance with the programme. Between weeks 5-6 the patient will have a further session with the clinical psychologist, just prior to admission for treatment, to prepare them for their impending hospitalisation.
Again, information immediately pre-operatively will be collected to include a repeat assessment of physical function with a 6-minute walk test, Peak Expiratory Flow Rate (PEFR), SF-36 assessment and HADS score. In addition, patients will be asked to fill out a questionnaire assessing compliance with and acceptability of the prehabilitation programme. Smoking cessation rate will be collected.
Data Collection
The following demographic data will be recorded on standardised data collection forms for each patient, collected from patient records and the patient interviews:
- Inclusion and exclusion criteria
- Medical history/risk factors
- ASA classification
- Planned operative procedure details
- Physical status using functional capacity, measured in metabolic equivalents (METs), with a Duke Activity Status Index (score of less than 4 indicates poor physical function).
Functional capacity may be usually expressed in metabolic equivalents (METs), where one MET is defined as the oxygen consumption of a 70-kg man at rest. Greater than 7 METs of activity tolerance is considered excellent, whereas less than 4 METs is considered poor activity tolerance.
The Duke Activity Status Index suggests questions that correlate with MET levels; for example, walking on level ground at about 4 miles per hour or carrying a bag of groceries up a flight of stairs expends approximately 4 METs of activity. This system is used by the Cleveland clinic for pre-operative cardiac evaluation. It allows a pre-operative assessment of physical function to assess predicted ability to cope at home after surgery. A brief, self-completed questionnaire (Appendix 1) can provide a standardized assessment of functional status that correlates well with an objective measure of maximal exercise capacity [14].
Post-operative data will be collected for patients in order to plan for a further study based on reducing length of stay.
- Inpatient complications: grade and details using standardised data collection sheets
- Length of stay
- HDU/ITU use
- Mortality
At base line visit and prior to operation each patient will be assessed using:
- Baseline Quality of Life assessment using SF-36 forms
- Hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS).
- Exercise testing by a standardised 6-minute walk test
- Peak Expiratory Flow Rate (PEFR)
An event log will be recorded for each patient throughout the study period.
Patients undergoing intervention will be asked to complete a short questionnaire on compliance and acceptability of the prehabilitation programme.
ANALYSIS Completed data collection sheets will be analysed for omissions and missing data completed before being logged onto a central database and analysed by the research team at Imperial College, London, St. Mary's Campus.
The two groups will be compared using simple statistical methods. We intend to analyse and report on the following
- The number of patients who accepted inclusion into a pre-operative prehabilitation programme will be calculated.
- The change in physical fitness of patients (assessed by the physical function section of SF-36 and measured with peak flow/6-minute walk testing) during the pre-operative phase will be assessed pre and post-intervention groups.
- The effects on quality of life.
- The effect of a programme on anxiety and depression on each study participant will be assessed.
- The number of patients who are able to reduce or cease smoking will be reported.
- Compliance and acceptability of the prehabilitation programme.
- Morbidity and Mortality, HDU/ITU resource use as well as Length of hospital stay after aortic surgery.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Pre-intervention | No intervention | –Patients treated as standard before intervention |
| Post-intervention arm = Prehabilitation | Active comparator | Behavioral: Post-intervention arm = PrehabilitationIntroduction of rehabilitation program |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 40 to 95 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- patients undergoing elective repair, willing/able to undertake a period of prehabilitation, and those able to comprehend and retain instructions regarding self-training.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Symptomatic patients or those undergoing urgent treatment (< 2 weeks)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Post-intervention arm = PrehabilitationIntroduction of a physical exercise training programme, psychological counselling and smoking cessation advice | Behavioural | Post-intervention arm = Prehabilitation |
Primary outcome
The Number of Patients Who Accepted Inclusion Into a Pre-operative Prehabilitation Programme
Time frame: Collected at screening
This describes the number of people within the study who were in the pre-habilitation study arm that accepted and completed the pre-habilitation training
Change From Baseline in Metabolic Equivalents (METS) at Six Weeks
Time frame: Collected at baseline and (expected) 6 weeks
• Metabolic equivalent level is a measure of physical fitness. One MET is defined as 3.5 mL 02 uptake/kg per minute which is the resting oxygen uptake in a sitting position. The achieved exercise capacity in METs has been shown to be predictive in older adult population of survival with higher MET levels associated with improved survival," or similar definition that is accurate and appropriate.
Decrease in Anxiety and Depression Scores (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale)
Time frame: Collected at baseline and (expected) 6 weeks
HADS is a validated questionnaire consisting of 7 statements relating to anxiety and 7 statements relating to depression. Each statement is scored between 0 and 3 giving a total score of up to 21 for each section. A score of 0-7 is assumed to be normal and score greater than this suggestive of a mood disorder
Number of Participants With Attendance at the Physical and Psychological and Social Training Appointments of the Rehabilitation Programme (Assessed by Bespoke Questionnaire)
Time frame: Collected at baseline and during the study
2 secondary outcomes
HDU/ITU Resource Use (Number of Days Stay)
Time frame: Collected at (expected) 6 weeks +hospital stay
LOS
Time frame: Collected at (expected) 6 weeks +hospital stay
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Jul 2019.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 17013852Rooks DS, Huang J, Bierbaum BE, Bolus SA, Rubano J, Connolly CE, Alpert S, Iversen MD, Katz JN. Effect of preoperative exercise on measures of functional status in men and women undergoing total hip and knee arthroplasty. Arthritis Rheum. 2006 Oct 15;55(5):700-8. doi: 10.1002/art.22223.
- Background: PubMed 21878237Mayo NE, Feldman L, Scott S, Zavorsky G, Kim DJ, Charlebois P, Stein B, Carli F. Impact of preoperative change in physical function on postoperative recovery: argument supporting prehabilitation for colorectal surgery. Surgery. 2011 Sep;150(3):505-14. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2011.07.045.
- Background: PubMed 19212103Kim DJ, Mayo NE, Carli F, Montgomery DL, Zavorsky GS. Responsive measures to prehabilitation in patients undergoing bowel resection surgery. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2009 Feb;217(2):109-15. doi: 10.1620/tjem.217.109.
- Background: PubMed 23052535Li C, Carli F, Lee L, Charlebois P, Stein B, Liberman AS, Kaneva P, Augustin B, Wongyingsinn M, Gamsa A, Kim DJ, Vassiliou MC, Feldman LS. Impact of a trimodal prehabilitation program on functional recovery after colorectal cancer surgery: a pilot study. Surg Endosc. 2013 Apr;27(4):1072-82. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2560-5. Epub 2012 Oct 9.
- Background: PubMed 20602503Carli F, Charlebois P, Stein B, Feldman L, Zavorsky G, Kim DJ, Scott S, Mayo NE. Randomized clinical trial of prehabilitation in colorectal surgery. Br J Surg. 2010 Aug;97(8):1187-97. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7102.
- Background: PubMed 17644041Dunckley M, Ellard D, Quinn T, Barlow J. Coronary artery bypass grafting: patients' and health professionals' views of recovery after hospital discharge. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2008 Mar;7(1):36-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcnurse.2007.06.001. Epub 2007 Jul 23.
- Background: PubMed 9830373Kiecolt-Glaser JK, Page GG, Marucha PT, MacCallum RC, Glaser R. Psychological influences on surgical recovery. Perspectives from psychoneuroimmunology. Am Psychol. 1998 Nov;53(11):1209-18. doi: 10.1037//0003-066x.53.11.1209.
- Background: PubMed 1299818Devine EC. Effects of psychoeducational care for adult surgical patients: a meta-analysis of 191 studies. Patient Educ Couns. 1992 Apr;19(2):129-42. doi: 10.1016/0738-3991(92)90193-m.
- Background: PubMed 7055315Mumford E, Schlesinger HJ, Glass GV. The effect of psychological intervention on recovery from surgery and heart attacks: an analysis of the literature. Am J Public Health. 1982 Feb;72(2):141-51. doi: 10.2105/ajph.72.2.141.
- Background: PubMed 18703241Furze G, Dumville JC, Miles JN, Irvine K, Thompson DR, Lewin RJ. "Prehabilitation" prior to CABG surgery improves physical functioning and depression. Int J Cardiol. 2009 Feb 6;132(1):51-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2008.06.001. Epub 2008 Aug 15.
- Background: PubMed 17850308Owen D, Bicknell C, Hilton C, Lind J, Jalloh I, Owen M, Harrison R. Preoperative smoking cessation: a questionnaire study. Int J Clin Pract. 2007 Dec;61(12):2002-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2007.01565..x. Epub 2007 Sep 10.
- Background: PubMed 10929164Arthur HM, Daniels C, McKelvie R, Hirsh J, Rush B. Effect of a preoperative intervention on preoperative and postoperative outcomes in low-risk patients awaiting elective coronary artery bypass graft surgery. A randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 2000 Aug 15;133(4):253-62. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-133-4-200008150-00007.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. This trial did not complete as expected and therefore there are no meaningful participant data to share.
Related trials for Aortic Aneurysm
RecruitingPhase 4
Effect of Remimazolam Versus Propofol Total Intravenous Anesthesia on Intraoperative Hemodynamic Stability in Patients Undergoing Thoracic or Abdominal Endovascular Aortic Repair
Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracoabdominal, Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Effects of Remimazolam on Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction and Neuroinflammatory Biomarkers in Patients Undergoing Aortic Arch Surgery
Aortic Aneurysm of the Proximal Arch, Aortic Aneurysms Arch
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Aortic Size and Height Indices in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms
Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm, Ruptured
Recruiting
GORE® TAG® Thoracic Branch Endoprosthesis Zone 0/1 Post-Approval Study
Aortic Arch Dissection, Aortic Arch Aneurysm
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Real-World Data Collection of GORE Devices Used In the Endovascular Treatment of Aortic Aneurysms Which Incorporate Visceral Arteries.
Complex Aortic Aneurysms, Thoracoabdominal Aneurysm
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Post-intervention arm = Prehabilitation in people with Aortic Aneurysm, run by Imperial College London.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Jul 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 17 Jul 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The Number of Patients Who Accepted Inclusion Into a Pre-operative Prehabilitation Programme (time frame: Collected at screening). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02292927, which also lists 14 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Jul 2019; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 30 Oct 2026.