Type 2 Diabetes MellitusPhase 3SORELLA2NCT02294474
Comparison of SAR342434 to Humalog as the Rapid Acting Insulin in Adult Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Also Using Insulin Glargine
A Phase 3 study testing SAR342434, Humalog and insulin glargine HOE901 in people with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, run by Sanofi at 103 sites in 12 countries.
Trial summary
Primary Objective: To demonstrate non-inferiority of SAR342434 versus Humalog in glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) change from baseline to Week 26 in participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) also using insulin glargine. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
- What is being tested?
- SAR342434, Humalog and insulin glargine HOE901
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 505 participants
- Where
- 103 sitesin 12 countries
- Study dates
- Jan 2015to Feb 2016
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Participants with T2DM diagnosed for at least 12 months and treated with insulin glargine and Humalog®/Liprolog® or NovoLog®/NovoRapid® (at least 3 times daily, before each meal) in the 6 months prior to the screening visit.
- Signed written informed consent.
Who cannot join
- At screening visit, age under legal age of adulthood.
- HbA1c <6.5% or >10.0% at screening.
- Diabetes other than T2DM.
- Pregnancy and lactation.
- Women of childbearing potential not protected by highly effective contraceptive method of birth control.
- Use of insulin pump in the 6 months before screening visit.
Show all 13Show fewer
- Use of insulin other than insulin glargine and Humalog or NovoLog/NovoRapid in the 6 months prior to screening visit. Liprolog® is an European Union (EU) approved insulin lispro and is allowed in those countries where it is marketed.
- Use of Humalog/Liprolog or Novolog/NovoRapid less than 3 times daily, before each meal.
- Use of non-injectable peptides (eg, Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor-agonists or other peptides) in the 6 months prior to screening visit.
- Body mass index (BMI) >=40kg/m² at screening visit.
- Hospitalization for diabetic ketoacidosis in the last 6 months before screening visit.
- Unstable proliferative diabetic retinopathy or any other rapidly progressive diabetic retinopathy or macular edema likely to require treatment (eg, laser, surgical treatment, or injectable drugs) during the study period.
- The above information is not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a participant's potential participation in a clinical trial
Trial locations and contacts
103 sites in 12 countries.
103 sites in 12 countries
United States51 sites
Investigational Site Number 840248
Arlington Heights, Illinois, 60005
Investigational Site Number 840203
Austin, Texas, 78731
Investigational Site Number 840204
Avon, Indiana, 46123
Investigational Site Number 840214
Boynton Beach, Florida, 33472
Investigational Site Number 840245
Chandler, Arizona
Investigational Site Number 840208
Chattanooga, Tennessee, 37404
Investigational Site Number 840221
Columbus, Ohio, 43201
Investigational Site Number 840258
Dallas, Texas, 75231
Investigational Site Number 840201
Dallas, Texas, 75246
Investigational Site Number 840255
Dayton, Ohio, 45439
Investigational Site Number 840230
Des Moines, Iowa, 50314
Investigational Site Number 840241
El Cajon, California, 92020
Investigational Site Number 840257
Evansville, Indiana, 47714
Investigational Site Number 840225
Fargo, North Dakota, 58103
Investigational Site Number 840217
Foley, Alabama, 36535
Investigational Site Number 840238
Fresno, California, 93720
Investigational Site Number 840229
Greenbrae, California, 94904
Investigational Site Number 840232
Greensboro, North Carolina, 27408
Investigational Site Number 840231
Huntington Beach, California, 92648
Investigational Site Number 840215
Jackson, Tennessee, 38305
Investigational Site Number 840220
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89119
Investigational Site Number 840233
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89148
Investigational Site Number 840253
Lawrenceville, Georgia, 30046
Investigational Site Number 840216
Lincoln, Nebraska, 68521
Investigational Site Number 840224
Linden, New Jersey
Investigational Site Number 840212
Little Rock, Arkansas, 72205
Investigational Site Number 840247
Long Beach, California, 90807
Investigational Site Number 840234
Los Angeles, California, 90057
Investigational Site Number 840246
Miami, Florida, 33176
Investigational Site Number 840209
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53209-0996
Investigational Site Number 840211
Morehead City, North Carolina, 28557
Investigational Site Number 840228
Morganton, North Carolina, 28655
Investigational Site Number 840237
Muscle Shoals, Alabama, 35661
Investigational Site Number 840226
New Port Richey, Florida, 34652
Investigational Site Number 840235
Northridge, California, 91325
Investigational Site Number 840205
Ocoee, Florida, 34761
Investigational Site Number 840206
Palm Harbor, Florida, 34684
Investigational Site Number 840251
Palm Springs, California, 92262
Investigational Site Number 840219
Phoenix, Arizona, 85028
Investigational Site Number 840227
Phoenix, Arizona, 85050
Investigational Site Number 840242
Port Charlotte, Florida, 33952
Investigational Site Number 840222
Renton, Washington, 98055
Investigational Site Number 840239
Rockville, Maryland, 20852
Investigational Site Number 840249
Santa Ana, California, 92704
Investigational Site Number 840207
Stockbridge, Georgia, 30281
Investigational Site Number 840223
Temecula, California, 92591
Investigational Site Number 840250
Tipton, Pennsylvania, 16684
Investigational Site Number 840236
Troy, Michigan, 48085
Investigational Site Number 840259
Tustin, California, 92780
Investigational Site Number 840243
Uniontown, Pennsylvania, 15401
Investigational Site Number 840240
Walnut Creek, California, 94598
Romania10 sites
Investigational Site Number 642210
Bacau, 600154
Investigational Site Number 642201
Bucharest, 020042
Investigational Site Number 642202
Bucharest, 020042
Investigational Site Number 642206
Cluj-Napoca, 400006
Investigational Site Number 642204
Deva, 330084
Investigational Site Number 642205
Oradea, 410159
Investigational Site Number 642209
Sibiu, 550371
Investigational Site Number 642207
Târgu Mureş, 540142
Investigational Site Number 642208
Târgu Mureş, 540142
Investigational Site Number 642203
Timișoara, 300456
Hungary7 sites
Investigational Site Number 348205
Budapest, 1036
Investigational Site Number 348202
Budapest, 1135
Investigational Site Number 348204
Debrecen, 4032
Investigational Site Number 348208
Komárom, 2900
Investigational Site Number 348210
Nagykanizsa, 8800
Investigational Site Number 348209
Sátoraljaújhely, 3980
Investigational Site Number 348203
Szolnok, 5004
Germany6 sites
Investigational Site Number 276201
Berlin, 10115
Investigational Site Number 276204
Heidelberg, 69115
Investigational Site Number 276202
Neumünster, 24534
Investigational Site Number 276206
Potsdam, 14469
Investigational Site Number 276205
Stuttgart, 70378
Investigational Site Number 276203
Sulzbach-Rosenberg, 92237
Argentina5 sites
Investigational Site Number 032201
Caba, C1425AGC
Investigational Site Number 032206
Capital Federal, C1056ABJ
Investigational Site Number 032202
Capital Federal, C1179AAB
Investigational Site Number 032205
Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aire
Investigational Site Number 032203
Salta, 4400
Russia5 sites
Investigational Site Number 643201
Saint Petersburg, 190013
Investigational Site Number 643203
Saint Petersburg, 194354
Investigational Site Number 643204
Saint Petersburg, 194358
Investigational Site Number 643202
Saint Petersburg, 195257
Investigational Site Number 643205
Saratov, 410030
Italy4 sites
Investigational Site Number 380203
Bologna, 40138
Investigational Site Number 380201
Milan, 20132
Investigational Site Number 380204
Roma, 00133
Investigational Site Number 380202
Sesto San Giovanni, 20099
South Korea4 sites
Investigational Site Number 410202
Seoul, 110-746
Investigational Site Number 410204
Seoul, 130-872
Investigational Site Number 410205
Seoul, 139-872
Investigational Site Number 410201
Wŏnju, 220-701
Turkey (Türkiye)4 sites
Investigational Site Number 792201
Istanbul, 34303
Investigational Site Number 792202
Istanbul, 34890
Investigational Site Number 792204
Izmir, 35100
Investigational Site Number 792203
Izmir, 35340
Chile3 sites
Investigational Site Number 152202
Santiago, 7500347
Investigational Site Number 152204
Santiago, 7500347
Investigational Site Number 152201
Santiago, 7500710
Spain3 sites
Investigational Site Number 724201
Barcelona, 08035
Investigational Site Number 724203
Málaga, 29010
Investigational Site Number 724202
Palma de Mallorca, 07010
About this study
Official title: Six-month, Randomized, Open-label, Parallel-group Comparison of the Insulin Analog SAR342434 to Humalog® in Adult Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Also Using Insulin Glargine
Primary Objective:
To demonstrate non-inferiority of SAR342434 versus Humalog in glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) change from baseline to Week 26 in participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) also using insulin glargine.
Read more
Secondary Objectives:
To assess the immunogenicity of SAR342434 and Humalog in terms of positive/negative status and antibody titers at baseline and during the course of the study; To assess the relationship of anti-insulin antibodies with efficacy and safety. To assess the efficacy of SAR342434 and Humalog on: proportion of participants reaching target HbA1c <7.0% and <=6.5%, fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and self-measured plasma glucose (SMPG) profiles, and insulin dose.
To assess safety of SAR342434 and Humalog.
Read the detailed description
The study will consist of a: up to 2 weeks screening period, 26-week treatment period, and 1-day follow-up period.
The maximum study duration will then be 28 weeks per participant and a 1-day safety follow-up.
- Conditions
- Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
- Being tested
- SAR342434, Humalog, insulin glargine HOE901
- Medical subject headings
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
SAR342434Drug
SAR342434 100 U/mL (dose range of 1 Unit to 80 Units) self-administered by subcutaneous (SC) injection, immediately (within 5 -10 minutes) before meals intake. Dose adjusted to achieve 2 hour post prandial glucose (PPG) in range of 6.7 to 8.9 mmol/L (120 to 160 mg/dL) while avoiding hypoglycemia.
HumalogDrug
Also called Insulin Lispro
Humalog 100 U/ml (dose range of 1 unit to 60 units) self-administered by SC injection, immediately (within 5-10 minutes) before meals intake. Dose adjusted to achieve a 2 hour PPG in range of 6.7 to 8.9 mmol/L (120 to 160 mg/dL) while avoiding hypoglycemia.
insulin glargine HOE901Drug
Also called Lantus®
Insulin glargine 100 U/mL injected QD subcutaneously consistent with the local label. Doses adjusted to achieve glycemic target for fasting, preprandial plasma glucose (SMPG) between 4.4 to 7.2 mmol/L (80 to 130 mg/dL) without hypoglycemia.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| SAR342434 | Experimental | SAR342434 100 Unit/mL (U/mL) before meals intake on top of once daily (QD) Insulin Glargine, up to Week 26. Receives: Drug: SAR342434; Drug: insulin glargine HOE901 |
| Humalog | Active comparator | Humalog 100 U/mL before meals intake on top of QD Insulin Glargine, up to Week 26. Receives: Drug: Humalog; Drug: insulin glargine HOE901 |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 26
Change in HbA1c was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 26 value. Adjusted least square means and standard errors were obtained from a mixed-effect model with repeated measures (MMRM) to account for missing data, using all post-baseline HbA1c data available during the 6-month period and adequate contrasts at Week 26.
Measured: Baseline, Week 26
Secondary outcomes (7)
Percentage of Participants With HbA1c <7.0% and <=6.5% at Week 26
Participants who had no available assessment for HbA1c at Week 26 were considered as non-responders.
Measured: Week 26
Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) From Baseline to Week 26
Change in FPG was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 26 value. Adjusted least squares means and standard errors were obtained from a MMRM approach to account for missing data, using all post-baseline FPG data available during the 6-month period and adequate contrasts at Week 26.
Measured: Baseline, Week 26
Change in Mean 24-Hour Plasma Glucose Concentration From Baseline to Week 26
The mean 24-hour plasma glucose concentration was calculated based on 7-point self-measured plasma glucose (SMPG) profiles with plasma glucose measurements before and 2-hours after each main meal and at bedtime. 7-point SMPGs were performed at least two times in a week before baseline, before visit Week 12 and before visit Week 26. Mean 24-hour plasma glucose concentration was calculated for each profile and then averaged across profiles performed in the week before a visit. Change in mean 24-hour plasma glucose concentration was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 26 value. Adjusted least squares means and standard errors were obtained from a MMRM to account for missing data, using all post-baseline data available during 6-month period and adequate contrasts at Week 26.
Measured: Baseline, Week 26
Change in Post Prandial Glucose (PPG) Excursion From Baseline to Week 26
Plasma glucose excursions were calculated at breakfast, lunch and dinner for each 7-point SMPG profile, as 2-hour postprandial glucose (PPG) minus plasma glucose value obtained 30 minutes prior to start of the meal. Values of plasma glucose excursions at each visit were then calculated as average across the profiles performed in the week before the visit. Change in PPG excursions was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 26 value. Adjusted least squares means and standard errors were obtained from a MMRM to account for missing data, using all post-baseline data available during the 6-month period and adequate contrasts at Week 26.
Measured: Baseline, Week 26
Percentage of Participants With Hypoglycemia (Any Hypoglycemia, Documented Symptomatic Hypoglycemia and Severe Hypoglycemia)
Percentage of participants with at least one treatment emergent hypoglycemia reported at any time of the day were reported. Severe hypoglycemia was an event in which the participant required the assistance of another person to actively administer carbohydrate, glucagon, or other resuscitative actions. Documented symptomatic hypoglycemia was an event during which typical symptoms of hypoglycemia were accompanied by a measured plasma glucose concentration of <=70 mg/dL (3.9 mmol/L). Hypoglycemic episodes with plasma glucose of 54 mg/dL (<3.0 mmol/L) were also analyzed.
Measured: First dose of study drug up to 1 day after the last dose administration (maximum treatment exposure: 210 days)
Percentage of Participants With Hypersensitivity Reactions and Injection Site Reactions
Percentage of participants with hypersensitivity reactions and injection site reactions were reported.
Measured: First dose of study drug up to 1 day after the last dose administration (maximum treatment exposure: 210 days)
Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Anti-insulin Antibodies (AIAs)
Participants with treatment-emergent AIA (incidence) were reported (as participants with treatment-boosted or treatment-induced AIAs). Participants with treatment-induced AIAs were participants who developed AIA following IMP administration (participants with at least one positive AIA sample at any time during on-treatment period, in those participants without pre-existing AIA or with missing baseline sample). Participants with treatment-boosted AIAs were participants with pre-existing AIAs that were boosted to a significant higher titer following IMP administration (participants with at least one AIA sample with at least a 4-fold increase in titers compared to baseline value at any time during on-treatment period, in those participants with pre-existing AIA).
Measured: First dose of study drug up to 1 day after the last dose administration (maximum treatment exposure: 210 days)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Nov 2014 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2015
- Primary completionFeb 2016
- Study completionFeb 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Type 2 Diabetes MellitusStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by SanofiThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 505 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Sanofi
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Clinical Sciences & Operations, Study director, Sanofi
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02294474
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- EFC13403
- Other IDs
- 2014-002844-42, U1111-1156-4296, 2014
- Acronym
- SORELLA2
- Status last verified
- Dec 2017
- First submitted
- 14 Nov 2014
- Last updated
- 18 Jan 2018
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Derwahl KM, Bailey TS, Wernicke-Panten K, Ping L, Pierre S. Efficacy and Safety of Biosimilar SAR342434 Insulin Lispro in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes, Also Using Insulin Glargine: SORELLA 2 Study. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2018 Jan;20(1):49-58. doi: 10.1089/dia.2017.0281. Epub 2017 Dec 12.
PubMed 29232162
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Jan 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Six-month, Randomized, Open-label, Parallel-group Comparison of the Insulin Analog SAR342434 to Humalog® in Adult Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Also Using Insulin Glargine
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02294474
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SORELLA2 / EFC13403
- Conditions
- Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 505 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- SanofiIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Jan 2015
- Primary completion
- Feb 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- Feb 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 19 Nov 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 18 Jan 2018
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Primary Objective:
To demonstrate non-inferiority of SAR342434 versus Humalog in glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) change from baseline to Week 26 in participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) also using insulin glargine.
Secondary Objectives:
To assess the immunogenicity of SAR342434 and Humalog in terms of positive/negative status and antibody titers at baseline and during the course of the study; To assess the relationship of anti-insulin antibodies with efficacy and safety. To assess the efficacy of SAR342434 and Humalog on: proportion of participants reaching target HbA1c <7.0% and <=6.5%, fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and self-measured plasma glucose (SMPG) profiles, and insulin dose.
To assess safety of SAR342434 and Humalog.
Detailed description
The study will consist of a: up to 2 weeks screening period, 26-week treatment period, and 1-day follow-up period.
The maximum study duration will then be 28 weeks per participant and a 1-day safety follow-up.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| SAR342434 | Experimental | Drug: SAR342434, Drug: insulin glargine HOE901SAR342434 100 Unit/mL (U/mL) before meals intake on top of once daily (QD) Insulin Glargine, up to Week 26. |
| Humalog | Active comparator | Drug: Humalog, Drug: insulin glargine HOE901Humalog 100 U/mL before meals intake on top of QD Insulin Glargine, up to Week 26. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Participants with T2DM diagnosed for at least 12 months and treated with insulin glargine and Humalog®/Liprolog® or NovoLog®/NovoRapid® (at least 3 times daily, before each meal) in the 6 months prior to the screening visit.
- Signed written informed consent.
Key exclusion criteria (13 listed)
- At screening visit, age under legal age of adulthood.
- HbA1c <6.5% or >10.0% at screening.
- Diabetes other than T2DM.
- Pregnancy and lactation.
- Women of childbearing potential not protected by highly effective contraceptive method of birth control.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| SAR342434SAR342434 100 U/mL (dose range of 1 Unit to 80 Units) self-administered by subcutaneous (SC) injection, immediately (within 5 -10 minutes) before meals intake. Dose adjusted to achieve 2 hour post prandial glucose (PPG) in range of 6.7 to 8.9 mmol/L (120 to 160 mg/dL) while avoiding hypoglycemia. | Drug | SAR342434 |
| HumalogAlso: Insulin LisproHumalog 100 U/ml (dose range of 1 unit to 60 units) self-administered by SC injection, immediately (within 5-10 minutes) before meals intake. Dose adjusted to achieve a 2 hour PPG in range of 6.7 to 8.9 mmol/L (120 to 160 mg/dL) while avoiding hypoglycemia. | Drug | Humalog |
| insulin glargine HOE901Also: Lantus®Insulin glargine 100 U/mL injected QD subcutaneously consistent with the local label. Doses adjusted to achieve glycemic target for fasting, preprandial plasma glucose (SMPG) between 4.4 to 7.2 mmol/L (80 to 130 mg/dL) without hypoglycemia. | Drug | Humalog, SAR342434 |
Primary outcome
Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 26
Time frame: Baseline, Week 26
Change in HbA1c was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 26 value. Adjusted least square means and standard errors were obtained from a mixed-effect model with repeated measures (MMRM) to account for missing data, using all post-baseline HbA1c data available during the 6-month period and adequate contrasts at Week 26.
7 secondary outcomes
Percentage of Participants With HbA1c <7.0% and <=6.5% at Week 26
Time frame: Week 26
Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) From Baseline to Week 26
Time frame: Baseline, Week 26
Change in Mean 24-Hour Plasma Glucose Concentration From Baseline to Week 26
Time frame: Baseline, Week 26
Change in Post Prandial Glucose (PPG) Excursion From Baseline to Week 26
Time frame: Baseline, Week 26
Percentage of Participants With Hypoglycemia (Any Hypoglycemia, Documented Symptomatic Hypoglycemia and Severe Hypoglycemia)
Time frame: First dose of study drug up to 1 day after the last dose administration (maximum treatment exposure: 210 days)
Percentage of Participants With Hypersensitivity Reactions and Injection Site Reactions
Time frame: First dose of study drug up to 1 day after the last dose administration (maximum treatment exposure: 210 days)
Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Anti-insulin Antibodies (AIAs)
Time frame: First dose of study drug up to 1 day after the last dose administration (maximum treatment exposure: 210 days)
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Jan 2018.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Results publication: PubMed 29232162Derwahl KM, Bailey TS, Wernicke-Panten K, Ping L, Pierre S. Efficacy and Safety of Biosimilar SAR342434 Insulin Lispro in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes, Also Using Insulin Glargine: SORELLA 2 Study. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2018 Jan;20(1):49-58. doi: 10.1089/dia.2017.0281. Epub 2017 Dec 12.
Related trials for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly SHR-3167 Compared With Once-Daily Insulin Glargine in Adults With Insulin-Naive Type 2 Diabetes
Type 2 Diabetes
Active, not recruiting
Digital Reinforcement of Motivational Interviewing Micro-Skills Among Primary Care Healthcare Professionals
Hypertension (Without Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus)
Recruiting
Investigating Vascular Properties of HEMI and SPG Signals in Individuals With or at Risk for Chronic Kidney Disease
Chronic Kidney Disease, Hypertension (HTN)
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
A Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness and Safety of the Drug AZD6234 for Managing Weight in Adults Who Are Obese or Overweight. These Participants May or May Not Also Have Type 2 Diabetes
Obesity, Overweight
Not yet recruiting
Impact of Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty (ESG) in Obese Adults With Type 2 Diabetes (T2D)
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2D), Obesity (BMI>30)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Clinical Sciences & Operations study director
Sanofi
103 sites in 12 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing SAR342434, Humalog and insulin glargine HOE901 in people with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, run by Sanofi at 103 sites in 12 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Jan 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 103 sites in United States, Romania, Hungary, Germany, Argentina and 7 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 18 Jan 2018). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 26 (time frame: Baseline, Week 26). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02294474, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Jan 2018.