AzTrials
AzTrials

Acute Myeloid LeukemiaPhase 2NCT02294552

Post-transplantation Cyclophosphamide as GVHD Prophylaxis After HSCT

A Phase 2 study testing Cyclophosphamide, Busulfan and Fludarabine monophosphate in people with Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Acute Lymphoid Leukemia, run by Ivan S Moiseev at 1 site in Russia.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study evaluates the efficacy of high-dose post-transplantation cyclophosphomide as graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis after allogeneic stem cell transplantation in patients with different risk of GVHD. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 years
What is being tested?
Cyclophosphamide, Busulfan and Fludarabine monophosphate
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
200 participants
Where
1 siteRussia
Study dates
Oct 2014to Nov 2017
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients must have an indication for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
  • Signed informed consent
  • Patients with a donor available. The donor and recipient must be identical at at least one allele of each of the following genetic loci: HLA-A, HLA-B, HLA-Cw, HLA-DRB1, and HLA-DQB1. A minimum match of 5/10 is required for related donor. A minimum match of 8/10 is required for unrelated donor.
  • No second tumors
  • No severe concurrent illness

Who cannot join

  • Moderate or severe cardiac dysfunction, left ventricular ejection fraction <50%
  • Moderate or severe decrease in pulmonary function, FEV1 <70% or DLCO<70% of predicted
  • Respiratory distress >grade I
  • Severe organ dysfunction: AST or ALT >5 upper normal limits, bilirubin >1.5 upper normal limits, creatinine >2 upper normal limits
  • Creatinine clearance < 60 mL/min
  • Uncontrolled bacterial or fungal infection at the time of enrollment
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Requirement for vasopressor support at the time of enrollment
  • Karnofsky index <30%
  • Pregnancy
  • Somatic or psychiatric disorder making the patient unable to sign informed consent

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Russia1 site
  • First Pavlov State Medical University of St. Petersburg

    Saint Petersburg, 197089

Other trials in Russia

About this study

Official title: High-dose Post-transplantation Cyclophosphamide as Graft Versus-host Disease Prophylaxis After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

This study evaluates the efficacy of high-dose post-transplantation cyclophosphomide as graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis after allogeneic stem cell transplantation in patients with different risk of GVHD. The risk-adapted strategy involves using single-agent cyclophosphomide in recipients of matched bone marrow graft, and combining cyclophosphomide with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil in recipients of matched peripheral blood stem cells and mismatched bone marrow.

Being tested
Cyclophosphamide, Busulfan, Fludarabine monophosphate, Tacrolimus, Mycophenolate mofetil
Keywords
Cyclophosphamide, Leukemia, Lymphoma, Myelodysplastic Syndromes, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, Immunosuppressive Agents, Immune System Diseases, Busulfan, Fludarabine, Tacrolimus, Mycophenolate mofetil, Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating, Myeloablative Agonists, Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Allogeneic
Medical subject headings
Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute, Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma, Lymphoma, Myelodysplastic Syndromes, Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell, Immune System Diseases, Leukemia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT02294552
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Matched bone marrow graftExperimentalDays -8 through -4: Busulfan 1 mg/kg po qid x 4 days Days -3 through -2: Cyclophosphamide 50mg/kg/day iv x 2 days Or Days -7 through -2: Fludarabine 30 mg/m2/day iv x 6 days Days -4 through -3: Busulfan 1 mg/kg po qid x 2 days Day 0: Infusion of unmanipulated graft Day +3 and +4: Cyclophosphamide 50 mg/kg/day iv
Receives: Drug: Cyclophosphamide; Drug: Busulfan; Drug: Fludarabine monophosphate; Procedure: Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
Matched peripheral blood stem cells graftExperimentalDays -8 through -4: Busulfan 1 mg/kg po qid x 4 days Days -3 through -2: Cyclophosphamide 50mg/kg/day iv x 2 days Or Days -7 through -2: Fludarabine 30 mg/m2/day iv x 6 days Days -4 through -3: Busulfan 1 mg/kg po qid x 2 days Day 0: Infusion of unmanipulated graft Day +3 and +4: Cyclophosphamide 50 mg/kg/day iv Days +5 through +35: Mycophenolate mofetil 30 mg/kg/day, maximum 2 g/day, iv or po x 30 days Days +5 through +120: Tacrolimus 0.03 mg/kg/day with further correction by concentration
Receives: Drug: Cyclophosphamide; Drug: Busulfan; Drug: Fludarabine monophosphate; Drug: Tacrolimus; Drug: Mycophenolate mofetil; Procedure: Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
Mismatched peripheral blood stem cells or bone marrow graftExperimentalDays -8 through -4: Busulfan 1 mg/kg po qid x 4 days Days -3 through -2: Cyclophosphamide 50mg/kg/day iv x 2 days Or Days -7 through -2: Fludarabine 30 mg/m2/day iv x 6 days Days -4 through -3: Busulfan 1 mg/kg po qid x 2 days Day 0: Infusion of unmanipulated graft Day +3 and +4: Cyclophosphamide 50 mg/kg/day iv Days +5 through +35: Mycophenolate mofetil 45 mg/kg/day, maximum 3 g/day, iv or po x 30 days Days +5 through +120: Tacrolimus 0.03 mg/kg/day with further correction by concentration
Receives: Drug: Cyclophosphamide; Drug: Busulfan; Drug: Fludarabine monophosphate; Drug: Tacrolimus; Drug: Mycophenolate mofetil; Procedure: Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Incidence of acute and chronic GVHD, requiring treatment

    Measured: 365 days

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. Incidence of primary graft failure

    Measured: 60 days

  2. Non-relapse mortality analysis

    Measured: 365 days

  3. Overall survival analysis

    Measured: 365 days

  4. Event-free survival analysis

    Measured: 365 days

  5. Relapse rate analysis

    Measured: 365 days

  6. Toxicity based NCI CTC grades

    Measured: 100 days

  7. Infectious complications, including analysis of severe bacterial, fungal and viral infections incidence

    Measured: 100 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted19 Nov 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study startOct 2014
  3. Primary completionNov 2016
  4. Study completionNov 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
200 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02294552
Sponsor's protocol ID
PTCy-2014
Status last verified
Jan 2018
First submitted
30 Oct 2014
Last updated
16 Jan 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Moiseev IS, Pirogova OV, Alyanski AL, Babenko EV, Gindina TL, Darskaya EI, Slesarchuk OA, Bykova TA, Chukhlovin AB, Pevtcov DE, Bondarenko SN, Afanasyev BV. Risk-adapted GVHD prophylaxis with post-transplantation cyclophosphamide in adults after related, unrelated, and haploidentical transplantations. Eur J Haematol. 2018 May;100(5):395-402. doi: 10.1111/ejh.13030. Epub 2018 Mar 1.

    PubMed 29360184

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing Cyclophosphamide, Busulfan and Fludarabine monophosphate in people with Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Acute Lymphoid Leukemia, run by Ivan S Moiseev at 1 site in Russia.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Jan 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Russia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Incidence of acute and chronic GVHD, requiring treatment (time frame: 365 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02294552, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Jan 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in